#off-topic-tech
1 messages Β· Page 22 of 1
the screen is made to be anti scratch. So 0 scratches.
That is even worse. At least with folding it becomes smaller
Sarcasm.
i can BARELY fit the samsung a10e (which is a small smart phone in its class) in my jeans pocket....
π
and then i have to worry about the damned screen
if i could just ... flip it closed.....
Ok ok, follow me.
Iβd genuinely love a feature to use an external antenna for better cell reception
Phonemakers: let's make bigger phones. and bigger. and bigger. Every year.
X years later, Phonemakers: Oh noes. Now the phone no fit in pocket. Aha! Me smart. Let's make it foldable. 
exactly
they get their big stupid screens, but in a smaller size so they are not 100% stupid
Or make a mini phone
- You create a problem over X years. 2. Then "sell" the consumer a solution, a.k.a. foldable for a problem artificial created?
if i could fold up an ipad in 4ths, and stick it in my pocket ... i would LOVE that π
I can fit an iPad mini in my back pocketβ¦..
Like a laptop? π€
You sir need a netbook
pocket sized laptops ...
smartphones?
Anything from GPD would suit you
im just waiting for the device that straps around your wrist, then just holographically projects the screen between your thumb and index finger when you raise your hand up π€
For real, tech industry is losing clarity between: Computers <> Smartphones <> Tablets <> Laptops.
I do not want that
Computers= laptops

Exactly
and Apple wants to turn macOS into iOS ... blurring it even more
Like what is the difference anymore? They all do the same, more or less. They use more or less the same hardware (or are closing the gaps).
Man I love The Cure
iphones have ray tracing now too π
Is it just size?
Nvidia would like to have a word
But if it's just, does that mean if I buy a really big smartphone, it's actually a tablet? π
soon tablets will have SIM cards and cell reception π
and if I buy a laptop that fits in my pocket I have a foldable smartphone?
So if a laptop doesn't have a physical keyboard? Is it a tablet or a smartphone? A tablet because it doesn't have SIM?
thats something i wish apple would just 'do it already' ... is make all their macbook displays as touch screens in addition to the hardware keyboard/trackpad
You see how it looks to me? All nitpicking.
What laptop doesnβt have a physical keyboard
also I suppose it depends on the OS afforded to the device
But why do we need to label them anyways? If I need a small device to write emails and take calls I use a phone, if I need a big device to write emails and take calls I use a laptop
A real production one 
personally, i cant type/function on a 'display based keyboard' ... i need keys to push with fingers instead
Touch screen laptops are stupid too
Those are tablets?
So you need a big device with keyboard to write emails and take calls
π
Fuck tablets. I hate them. And my phone is just a music player to me (for on the road).
many times when im using my laptop, as a laptop (no external keyboard/mouse) ... ive often wanted to just reach up and tap the screen to click on buttons/icons/files .... instead of fumble about with the stupid trackpad and cursor
My phone is my gps too
I would ditch my phone if I could receive calls on my laptop. For real.
Just buy a good Canon camera to take photos. Buy a old paper map for navigation.
and I should be good? If people need me, call me on my laptop or email me.
i still need my phone for when im out of the house... like, to the grocery, store, errand.... not gonna drag my laptop with me to get calls π
But why do we have to be available 24/7 everywhere we go?
Ah yea ima walk through the store with my laptop for my grocery list
I don't like that. I like to disconnect sometimes.
mmmmm old paper maps ...... honestly after being spoiled on my garmin for decades, i cant recall how it was using MAPS in the city
βοΈ π
In case someone dies or is in an emergency. At the very least Iβd like to be able to respond in a timely fashion
This is how we did it in the old days π
I canβt read my own handwriting sometimes
Sounds like a you problem haha π
i never answer my phone in the car, i rarely even answer it when im out on an errand. i just bring it in case I need to call someone or look something up
Also one you can fix π
Yea exactly that ainβt who I wanna be
Only time yall wonβt reach me is when im sleeping
I take that serious
I understand all of your points, I have them too. But I don't think those points are really that big of a deal. It's handy to have a phone. But we survived perfectly without it before.
im pretty terrible about the phone .... i hate getting calls π
Yes, it's cool you can look up a recipe while in the store.
Or you could do that beforehand?
Whip out moms cook book at the store
yes, it's cool I get a phone call when my mom fell down the stairs.
But I rather just have it there is an ambulance helping her, then notifying me directly.
before i was 'forced' into a smartphone... i just had one of those flipphones (LG) .... i never used it when out, i only carried it 'in case of emergency'
it was nice
Or keep it basic. Spaghetti. Pizza. Fries. Eggs with Bacon.
π€’
What's wrong, doesn't MacDonald love Italian cuisine?
Not in America they donβt
who uses recipes, i just throw shit together when i cook ... drives my mother insane since she has to follow a recipe to the T, and im like ... eh, tos this in, stir that, boil this, fry ... and it comes out yummy and she is like "HOW?!?!"
Nobody in America love italians?
what about the Italian Americans then? π€£
I use recipe if I make something new for first time.
I don't get why people steal iPhones
but then, i dont 'bake' or do desserts... those need recipes cause they are FINICKEY
sell value? iphones are known for high resell value. higher than android.
They're so useless once they're known as stolen by apple. Can't do shit with em
get your iphone stolen, expect harrasing texts and messages threatening your life and family to 'disable Find My' so they can wipe and reuse/sell it
until you disable Find My, the iphone is basically a brick they cant sell
Yeah, I avoid buying second hand iphones from certain cities in my country. Because I know the % of them being stolen is high.
Ship em to china for parts
Kade, what ifone you have?
15 pro max
My condolences
ah, was thinking of 12. Second hand.
Itβs old
is that the one with the giant protruding gaggle of lenses on the back?
I know, so is my 6S
Wonβt get iOS for much longer
You do know that the 12 will still get security updates for like 4-5 years?
i laughed at all the advertisements oogling the camera lenses on it, and i just sat π my π© hole off at how stupid that looked
Sounds good enough to me π
i walked into apple "Can i get that without the lenses? thanks."
"no? oh, well, nevermind"
Wtf is that
I'm not going to carry a dslr everywhere
no.... this ... LMAO
1000X better photos. Better controls. Better everything.
Fits into my back pocket?
Yeah, pay 1K for a phone with 50 camera's that still produce garbage images π€£
it was the 13 pro ... that was the one i thought was absurd and they kept promoting the absurd part so much in their tv ads
I don't think you understand
Nah, I get you.
You just want to take casual photos.
and not haul a big ass camera.
I don't want to shoot professional photos. I need something that's quick, easy and looks good
But it hurts me soul for some reason π€·ββοΈ
Not that you want that. The fact the companies keep tricking people into buying phones by adding camera's π€£
i can imagine the thickness and size of iphone 13 cases just to lift that sucker enough to safegaurd the cameras
raw quality is dependend on camera.
raw will still be shit, if your lenses are shit.
wat, this is real ? i thought i was looking at a joke image
you cannot magically improve a photos quality.
Ai
tell adobe that
Even AI isn't good at it yet.
AI IS KING! ALL HAIL AI!
and after working 10 years with photoshop, I know how it works π
it doesn't add pixels.
It's all just neat tricks, but the pixels stay the same.
ok, side bar.... someone rates a game 1 star for this reason: "Supposed to be 64 bit compatible, but does not open full screen."
π€
Trash review.
I smell an idiot.
Probably written out of frustration.
indeed ... like whats 64bit compatible got to do with full screen mode ?!
look up if the game anywhere notes it's 64-bit compatible.
because else they are talking out of their arse.
Iphone 12 64GB 350 euro
(2nd hand)
But it's blue. Mhm. π€
its 64bit compatible yes... but nowhere does 64bit compatible mean a game will run full screen π
The same I didn't give a negative review for HL, because the crash might as well be my fault. I did note that I had some crashes in my review.
In the end I might ahve fixed the crash, when I finished the game to 100% π¦
It was "view distance quality" that was put on Ultra. Reduced it to High and the crashes stopped.
but again, something like that has no bearing on if the game was 64bit compatible or not π
its like "game says it takes 1gb of space, but my windows 10 crashes when I open steam"
ie: complete nonsense review π
I like reading reviews.
so this new System Preferences panel in macOS13 is really easy to use and nice
π
What you talking 13 about? We are at 14.
I didn't install 14.
Looked at the features. Need/want 0 of them.
Screensavers? Airpods? Messages? That's what 14 did.
if 14 fixes all the blury folder icons in the finder... i would switch to it. but it doesnt
You got blurry folder icons?
Yeah blurry folders is new
Mine are sharpy. That's weird.
Mine are crayon.
I don't find any reports on this issue so far.
example ...
blury shit, and too much shadowing
the 10.15 icons were sublime, and sharp
and.... its even blury if i look at them on the high def laptop screen too .... (in native mode)
Today I learned my DRI_PRIME variable works backwards on my system.
Set to 0 for dedicated and 1 for integrated graphics.
almost to the point i wanna copy/paste a folder icon onto every single folder i have π
Man I posted this
It's better coming from me π
theres a python version
https://github.com/JJTech0130/pypush its built off
Apple will probably issue him a dcma cease and desist because he circumvented their technolocks. Shitty law
Apple is going to activate RCS on iPhones for that.
So they comply with regulations. 
It's loosely worded enough that it could probably go to trial. Not that I'm a lawyer. But the threat of legal action from well paid lawyers on someone with none is enough
RCS is going to be released in 2024. Problem solved.
Android and iPhone can communicate.
Well good on them. It's only been however many years... now if Apple would let me bluetooth transfer to another device that'd be nice
No, good on the goverments breathing down the neck of tech companies forcing them to change so we can benefit from it.
Without regulation, I doubt they would have changed course.
So you're saying apple had no choice, but they'll play it off as a new feature
That's what I pick up on the articles I've read so far.
I think that's what they've done with usbc on their phones.. I personally didn't mind the lighting connector
good luck carrying that around in the pocket of your pants
Full article for interested: www.androidpolice.com/why-apple-decided-to-adopt-rcs-iphone/
He just hates phone cameras lol
and foldable phones π
Physically, I actually prefer the tactile function and durability of lightning. In terms of charging and data transfer, usb-c is better
Kinda? More nuanced I believe, I hate phone makers, adding camera's, adding the price and then up the number of the model and pet themselves on the back. They have been doing this for ages.
My dslr does go with me most places
I am very happy with my 6S, it has one camera, I use it a lot to take pictures (more memories). But I don't need 3-5 camera's on my phone π
in the pocket of your pants?
Oh, it also has a face camera. Never used that.
The s22 camera is good enough that it'll do in a pinch if I don't have my dslr, but I really don't need a camera that nice on my phone
I'd rather have better battery life or something
In my car or in my camera bag
why not in your pockets? too bulky?
My phone is in the way
Yes
more pockets (my brain autopiloted and wanted to type "more pants")
More cameras more better.
especially the L-line lenses from Canon. But such a nice quality oof.
I totally see your point, and don't disagree with the concept of having a convienient, small camera with me all the time
It's really nice, but I don't need to be trying to mimic professional quality with it
It's kind of sickening that you've really obit got 3 phone makers, Apple, samsung, and google.
I shoot nikon, glass is even more expensive for their full frames
and Carl Zeiss!
I'm probably buying a zenphone for my next purchase
I was able to shoot with carl zeiss lens once at school.
Nobody else can enter the market because if the camera on the phone isn't good, it'll flop
Oh that's pretty neat
Prime lens:
I have the nikon 18-55 on my 5100. At 18 and 55 it performs like a $1200 glass
There are only a few scenarios where it's really worth it
I am a big fan of prime lenses.
Less artifacts from the lens itself.
Nice glass from sigma or nikon can have a genuine benefit for most people
A high quality zoom can more or less eliminate that
True, but not fully π
I shoot primes for portraiture and astrophotography, but most other stuff is zoom for me
This thing is amazing at 18... or 55
when fully zoomed out you have the barrel effect at the edges. (fish-lens effect, but waaaay reduced).
and when fully zoomed in, there was also some weird shenenigans. But you can revert that easily with a photoshop plugin.
Anything else it goes soft and has abrasion. But it's damn near perfect at those two settings
photoshop picks up what lens you used at what length and diafragma and then automatically corrects it.
I think lightingroom could do this too. Probably most photo software now.
This one is my dream.
Because I've done too many music gigs with a 50mm π€£ And you can zoom in... by walking forward. And zoom out ... by walking backwards. But it's hard when you are in the crowd.
Can you still get / use multipliers with lenses?
F2.8 is pretty fast at 50mm what is it at 200?
Concerts are dark. So my 50mm was a 1.4F, I didn't use that ofc for obvious reasons. But yeah, you need a lens with a big diafragma so it can catch as much light and have a fast shutter speed and low ISO.
And the lens I posted is 2.8 all over.
jesus lenses are expensive
That one is. If you have variable diafragma it's cheaper.
Introducing one of the most impressive feats of NIKKOR engineering yet-the remarkable full frame Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 800mm f/5.6E FL ED VR Lens. Offering sports, News and wildlife photographers the pinnacle of reach and performance, it combines advanced NIKKOR optics and lens technology within a du...
Ya think
literally the price of a nice car
and smaller minimum diafragma F4.
I mean, he is a famous dude and his lenses would be 2000 years old, so it's completely understandable that they're expensive
2.8 at 200mm damn that's nice glass
Exactly π One can only dream.
is?
Image stabilization
Oh.
Oh?
It's like magic
3rd gen is systems will let you shoot 100mm handheld at 1/15 no problem
This one has image stabilization. But only F4.
And I am kinda a snob for canon L lenses π
just because it's their Luxery line with the best quality. Even the white is done on purpose: heat reflection.
And the reason I don't like F4 is for portraits, I prefer F2.8, you can get beautiful depth of fields with it.
Have you ever seen nikon dc lenses?
I used nikon, but honestly that's long a ago.
Yep
I shoot all my portraits on an 85mm prime at 1.8
It's good untill I want to get multiple people in the shot and I'm 10m away
You know, that 70-200 would be a all rounder more or less. So I don't have to switch. I could go for prime, but don't want to switch lenses around in some places π
Nikon has an 18-200 that I've been looking at for a walk-around lens
I can relate, I have the same problem with 50mm. It's good quality images, fair price. But slightly less convenient sometimes.
and I don't like 18mm π€£ Always a bit, meh looking imo.
I rarely shoot below 28 unless I'm doing landscape stuff
Like I said, programs can fix the lens artifacts easily. But I rather still avoid it when possible.
Starting with a picture with a solid foundation is easier to work with in my experience.
I've seen students edit a single photo, for 4-6 hours straight. Didn't look like anything like the original. Had around 100 layers. A bit nuts. But the teachers loved the end result so yeah π€·ββοΈ
Broπ€£ rumor mill has already started with the female protagonist of gta6
This one I took with the 50mm.
Very nice
Exactly π
Oh nice
That's a fantastic camera
I just had a power outage with a big project open in gimp
None of it saved
oh no π¦
I know someone who has one that size
This you π³
Nah a friend.
Speaking of lenses, there's a 70-300 vr for sale very close to me
Not a fast lens, but the vr compensates for that
Im interested in getting a dslr but I have no idea where to start plus cash flow is limited
If you give me a budget I can give you a reccomendation
tbh my 15pro max does enough
just got trolled
id want a drone with a decent camera on it to get some sweet shots
Mavic air 2s
They go for about $500 pretty regularly
$750 π¬
If you get the non-s version it'll cut the price down to around 400
Beyond that, you'd want something from the mini lineup
The air line is enthusiast/borderline professional grade
I was thinking the mini 2 SE
I need a drone I can drop stuff with
That'll do a lot
Matrice 350 RTK Worry-Free Basic Combo
though i might want crash detection
Mini 3 pro has crash detection
I'm not sure if anything else in the mini lineup does
500 is a bit too steep
Cheap so it can get shot down
diy it
The cheapest option with obstacle avoidance would be the air 2 at 400 used
hmm
But that's only dji stuff
I mean theyre only decent company to my knowledge that isnt crazy chinese stuff
There are a fair few other companies with similarly good products, they're just not as well-known
I probably should save money for college 
pfft
also I think I need to register it and take a class or something
Depends on your area but probably
I mean I could dm you the state im in and you might know
Sure π€·ββοΈ
So I'm stuck without warranty
Would a Ark A770 be okay as a Gpu that's semi similar to the 6700XT
if youre fine with arc drivers then sure
I mean they are getting half decent lately
I could just but another 6700XT but none of the one I bought are available anymore
I can't belive you've killed a cpu & gpu in the last few months
I didn't try to kill the gpu
I swear
It was not intentuonal
I was running a stress test
And it showed no signs of issue
Until it decided to completely cease
The cpu I killed was incompetence
This was sudden and have no explainable reason why it died at this moment
Jokes aside, it's kinda interesting what they are doing π
Just like one more bro
Solar collider in our lifetime!
Was thinking this the whole time.
We'll just lay it down over the course of the year
Just build a collider around the earth
Itβll be big
Hope we don't kill each other by the time future circular collider is finished
eh, we've made it so far 
We have nuclear weapons, which we didn't have back then, so eh... might get tricky.
I am more interested to see how stellarator (fusion reactor) testing goes
Funny enough, if humanity doesn't wipe us out, and global warming doesn't, there is like x amount of other threats.
I mean they just want one week's worth of the US defense budget
cybertruck might be not allowed in europe 
I mean, I had my doubts about safety and such and regulations.
I want more images for James. Still think this is dope.
front of the car gotta be soft and crumple by regulation. Cybertruck is made out of stainless steel.
1+1=
haha π€£
well, I don't think it was intended for EU anyway.
I made a theorem I would like to call "asablic's theorem": the more company advertises, the worse it's products are 
true but loosing 15% of your preorders is a good move
doesn't Nvidia advertise a lot?
Yeah. Heineken is a perfect example. Terrible beer but great sales because of ads
Can't believe people are actually preordering the cybertruck π
I noticed conpanies that make bad products tend to compensate with advertising
I guess it's true in some cases
Balenciaga is probably the best trolling attempt ever. It's a actually a social experiment to test how dumb people actually are
never heard of Balenciaga
They made a purse that looks like lays potato chips bag and are selling it for $1800
There are many other crazy products
They could make worn-out socks with holes, sell them for $500 and people would still buy them because of brand
this is such a rich person move, running around with a shitty potato bag and let the world know you paid 1800 for it
Can it play satisfactory no it cant
Imagine programming with punch cards
Looking through Tesla owners groups is hilarious. The cope on the Cybertruck from fans is just nuts, especially the ones who are clearly never going to buy one, or are never going to truly "use" a truck.
How to know what does the smartphone consists of?
let's smash them together at high speeds and analyze the debree
hopefully, after a gazilion of iteration will find a whole apple silicon (buys only android phones)
Am I having a stroke?
Are you listening to a coxswain?
I don't know. The thing looks ugly.
But maybe it's just too different for me to like it.
The people I know looking to buy a vehicle to beat it to hell and back tend to buy cheap knowing they'll need to replace it anyway. Some sort of premium vehicle in that segment is weird.
$60k Cybertruck apparently not even coming until 2025.
herg said EU probably wont allow it.
so hopefully not my problem π
Like atleast the Tesla S is decent looking.
Why couldn't they go for a design like that, but then just higher.
There are a lot of things that Tesla does really well, but then they throw in headscratching gimmicks.
please put more TVs in the front of the car
I think it was for the publicitthw design is hugely polarizing, but it's actually dont a lot for brand recognition
we don't need to look at the road when we can play angry birds
eh, we got AR in cars already. In the glass.
but you're at least looking into the direction of the road
Apparently Elon wants 250k Cybertrucks per year in 2025. But I don't know who's going to buy them. The F150, Silverado, Tundra, etc. brands are really entrenched in the USA.
yeah sure, but I mean. I was thinking about it while driving. The law in our country says, we can't handle a electronic device while driving, but what about the board computer? π€
In a Tesla you manage everything with that big iPad I think in the middle?
jusp. Nothing physical so you gotta look down
weird, so technically, they can pull you over for changing the heat. Atleast in Belgium.
they should
It also depends on how long you look imo.
did you see the crashtest? the crunch zone is made of flesh and bones
I doubt that thing will even be street legal in most of Europe
it won't
^^
let me look it up
I mean, the airbags go off π€£
there is no crumple zone
look at the child in the bag
also, let's not talk about the fact that whatever you collide with will die
they dead.
I mean, it's like crashing with a tank π€·ββοΈ
Only the cybertruck is not sturdy enough to be a tank.
and not flexible enough to be a safe vehicle.
me flying out my cybertruck after getting into a crash (I was going 20 mph)
nope, thick ass glass
true
gonna break your neck on the windshield
So it is worth 60K! 
or get it snapped by the seatbelt
btw
$80k unless you wait to 2025. Which in Elon time might mean 2026.
what if you make your own custom seat? And add extra seatbelts? π
rofl π€£
breaking a rear axle after doing a frontal crash at 35mph is crazy
quality π
that's standard in-city driving speed for Europe, no?
it's ~50kmh/h
we don't do miles
yeah, equates to around 50 km/h
yeah, for some countries.
In the Netherlands it can be 60 or 80
they have all sorts of crazy numbers there.
and then between certain hours, you can only drive 100 on the highway. Else 130.
once you enter a city in Germany (pass the Orteingangsschild), it's 50 km/h
What the hell is a Orteingangsschild, schild is shield. gang is passage?
just so you know, this is a golf after 50kmh
yeah, 30 is also common in German cities
see how the back is still intact?
yeah. But the frontal damage is the same.
damaged all the way up the front tire.
Ort = place (in this case, city/village/whatever)
eingang = entrance
schild = sign
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCW2OUlFrrWiZvSsZRwOYmNg The VW Golf has been a benchmark of compact cars since its debut 45 years ago. Previous versions tested by Euro NCAP have rated well against the requirements at the time and the new Golf mk8 again has achieved the five full stars thanks to excellent crashworthiness and standard fit of num...
Oh, that makes much more sense.
Also, in the cybertruck picture, what is that blue stuff? water?
I think it jumped upward because the back was already broken and it couldn't bounce back. So the energy goes up.
also there isn't much infront of the ct
And yeah, the golf clearly just rolls back.
I know, isn't that great haha π€£
hitting a lamppost is damage up until the front tire
So this means the engine is behind the tires?
there is no room for it to be in front of it π€·ββοΈ
it's in the drivers stomach
or is it in the back?
Wtf is this π€£
an NFT probably
It looks weird.
For some reason I'm reminded of GN's Alienware teardown video, where Steve commented that there was some very clever engineering to do really stupid things. I bet the same thing is going on her, people were given directives based on Elon's whims.
honestly, I'm still waiting for some prepper to mount a browning onto that thing
for sure
probably with solar panel on the roof for infinite range
i wonder if it can even manage rough terrain
or a) get stuck - b) fall apart
this is their "rough" terrain test? π€
Tesla has live-streamed two release candidate Cybertrucks undergoing 1280-mile off-road durability testing in the Baja peninsula using Starlink mobility units mounted on the trucks. Below is everything we learned about the Cybertruck durability test.
A few days ago, images of twin Tesla Cybertrucks emblazoned with neon graffiti emerged online. ...
off road testing .. on a road
with a camera-man that can't handle the cam.. phone
with post recording lowered encoding quality
exactly
with curiously the car body very high
It's such a dumb car
Yes cool the production quality is shit, but the whole concept is so abnormally dumb. Why do you need a bulletproof car made out of stainless steel?
I don't see any nonsense.
Imagine burning to a crisp because the emergency service can't cut you out of it
we're just shitting on the cybertruck π€·ββοΈ
that's not nonsense. It's facts.
Plus have you seen the picture I posted? It's compatible for outdoors camping!

π€«
What do you think of this?
I hate this company
what are they called again?
Because the owner is corrupt?
Polestar
nah because they have a super "luxurious" and rich looking shop right infront of a homeless shelter in frankfurt
And I was more curious about the design of the car. Than the company behind it.
I rather buy a polestar than a cybertruck.
I would love to see a few more dumbass billionaires like Elon competing in a public duel about who can do the dumbest shit with their money
or we do what Nico Semsrott suggested in EU parliament: make a reality TV show with a bunch of billionaires, every billionaire has to compete for a favorable public opinion - cuz at the end of the show, the least popular candidate gets disowned
You guys hear about Uber charging people more simply because their phone battery is low?
Scummy mofos
Or charging Mac users more
did you hear that after 2025, users of windows 10 can keep receiving updates if they pay windows? 
Pay for updates?
hasn't that been the case with every windows version?
Yes after 2025 updates are discontinued. Unless you pay 
It has been the case for companies.
But now everyone can.
yes and users usually didn't get any updates after
The shitty thing is, people say: buy W11. But then you need the hardware to support it.
just rufus it
Darn it.
lol
Like the Windows 7 ESU program, your organization will be able to purchase a yearly subscription to security updates. The yearly commitment is renewable for three years. Devices enrolled in ESUs will receive monthly security updates to keep these Windows 10 PCs secure.
Imagine having to pay for a dev to fix their own fucking bugs and exploits?!?!?!?
Narcissism right there
Windows 7 program costed 280 dollar for 3 years.
y'all acting like this is a new and outrageous thing
there is much worse to be mad about that EOL support
New to me.
about 3/4 of the license iirc
The ESU program provides individual consumers and organizations of all sizes with the option to extend the use of Windows 10 PCs past the end of support date in a more secure manner.
The consumer part is new.
yeah. Consumers didn't get any support after the EOL
Iβve been thinking about switching to Linux, maybe even Mac OS.
So users either have to pay for updates, or buy W11 and maybe upgrade their hardware π
W10 wasn't hardware locked.
Just a shitty situation to put consumers in. If you going to keep updating anyway, why ask money for it?
Eh, I would say, try Linux?
this is just old drama cooked up again π
how can it be old 
it's the same "uuuhhh now you need a security chip" drama that happened when win11 got release
I mean, it sucks.
I didn't like it. I eventually bought a new PC and have W11 installed. Still, the hardware lock is weird.
It does but it also serves a purpose.
Especially when everyone and their mom is keeping all their financial shit on their PC
I've read somewhere most PC's still have W10 installed. So they are vulnerable already. Doubt they know they have to upgrade their hardware.
Yes MS should have enforced it way sooner
eventually stuff breaks down and they have to ... but casual users don't know. Like my mom.
She doesn't know anything about W11 and wont buy a new laptop π€·ββοΈ
I hope they communicate it properly to the users.
AI is the next hardware "need"
But I assume defender will still get updates since it uses the same database
The security chip is probably pointless, until you go all the way and lockdown the whole platform like an iPhone, people will click through every warning in the end.
Nah that's all cloud. Gotta farm data somehow
Some do say that.
No, they'll use your hardware locally for all its worth on top of data mining. Cuts their costs and makes them more money. π
Also consumer is just one side. On the other you have businesses that need their data protected
never heard of companies that are cheapskates? 
That's why you have inspiron
Anyways herg go sleep to be a productive member of society tomorrow
the "security chip" have almost nothing to do with security unless you enable full storage encryption (windows bitlocker for instance)
and then it is just mid security (but it's nice to have especially for consumer users)
the security we are talking about are way more useful for secure token sessions (tracking, in a good way)
but can also be : tracking in a bad way
unless you do full storage encryption
just boot the fucking machine
The data is only encrypted when attacked from the outside. Once hackers get in your system, the files are decrypted.
it's useful against storage copy/stealer
but it's not usefull against physical machine access
Unless you have very good security on your os
there is no such thing
that's why you need layers of security.
You can always reduce the chance.
yes, but there is no "unless" it's just better
Yubikey + physical password π
Honestly, I'm rarely interested in security issues relating to physical access. At that point, you're screwed, period.
And if there's ever data you're really protective of, encrypt it within windows using a unique password
doesn't even have to be physical.
that's what I said
Ongoing network access counts I suppose
there are ways to get access from a network to encrypted data.
Probably the only physical security risk that scares me is people looking to fry my machine just to be malicious, or steal it and sell it.
Especially with a desktop that stays in my house, I'm more worried about damage & data loss than physical vectors of attack for data theft
secure boot is to protects against remote malwares
and TPM is to protect against side replicated data/sessions attacks
like copying the disk, and analysing it later
Things which have no relevance to me because I don't work for a defense contractor.
that is not enough for a defense contractor
or your defense contractor is a dumbass
that is nice for consumer or prosumer
Tbh the only true security is airgapped in a protected location
because it's too easy to copy disks and sessions and overwrite booting otherwise
TPM and secure boot does nothing again pc physical attacks
I don't know I am pretty sure I heard somewhere it can still be accessed.
it just protects against remote access and copies
You wouldn't believe how creative hackers are.
that means nothing unless you give context of what you are talking about exactly
How can you believe that Bitlocker is perfect secure to attacks from the outside. I am not a hacker. But I'm pretty sure there are some videos out there that show you how.
what are you calling perfect secure ?
who talked about perfect secure here ?
Well you implying it cannot be accessed from the outside made me assume you think it's perfect.
I didnt said it can't be accessed from outside
I said it can't be accessed from copy of the storage
now some "smart" people will tell you you can reconstruct the data with external elements, but then you didnt access it, you just workaround it with way heavier means that it would basically be stupid to try that with that kind of budget
I mean there are easier way than working on a copy when you have the budget to get the original machine with the user
welcome to security
perfect security is when it is hard enough people will not invest in hacking it
perfect doesn't exist.
not in security.
^
the definition people usually have about perfect is ideal
perfect is not ideal
but I agree, good security is to make it hard enough to keep hackers away.
my definition of perfect, is not ideal. It's perfect. It's a word. π€£
I mean literally, perfect doesn't exist. There is always a way to get in. A perfect secure system to me means this: impenetrable
the thing is perfect exists but you dont get it when you want it
"impenetrable" is an idea
not a real thing
That's not the actual definition of perfect. Perfect means there is no actual or theoretical way it could be improved.
and that can actually happen to be real
and not in an ideal way
Example?
it sure is always possible to improve shit
but mostly because shit is the standard
and then people say they want ideal thing
because you would want it better does not means it makes sense
" Perfect means there is no actual or theoretical way it could be improved."
yes
So no system is perfect. π€·ββοΈ
some are but it's very complicated to find and demonstrate
most commonly people learns things was quite perfect too late, after they "improved it" but it actually made no sense and it actually end up worse
I just want to be realistic here.
and realistically lot of things could have and should be improved
I can't think of any. A lot of systems in nature even have flaws.
but some are just what makes most sense at all
Oh, I see what you are reffering too π€£
According to Plato, his Theory of Forms states perfection only lives in the realm of thought. There only exists one of every ideal and the rest is just a copy.
I dont connect the two sentences
But he is saying the same thing as: it's a fact that perfection can't be achieved.
You were referring to an "ideal" before.
because that sentences basically mix perfect with ideal
and remember it's translations
π
π
You are saying the same shit as Plato.
Anyway, I gotta finish watching this "amazing" movie.
I feel like I'm not saying the same thing
but it could be true that the notions are close to each others
what I say is that perfection exist but you can't thought of it until reality hit you with it
but you need to stay humble
all what you think is ideal by nature
I am humble, all I am saying no system is perfect. π€·ββοΈ
so my definition is, perfection can exist, but you can't think of it
what you think of it is just ideal
so you can make things get close to it, and prove it
Hey you know how this works. You show me proof. And I look into it with an open mind.
but aslong there is no proof, I aint buying it. I believe in science.
it's very hard to explain example, mostly because meanings and matters
if we are talking about it, then it's probably beacause there is something to do better about it
so for sure perfect things we almost never talk about it
what I'm talking about is very tightly linked to science itself
if you think that everything is only a matter of thought, then you can say nothing can be made so it is technically perfect
because it would only be a matter of thought
what I say is to be humble, some things may be perfect, you just will mostly dont know about it
things have limits
you always do with limits
and that's very part of science
You like our solar system drifting apart?
Or the sun about to die. Eventually.
there is nothing to say about it
I don't know. Maybe there is, but we haven't found it.
and like I said. Science states: we need proof.
exactly
Bro. Shit doesn't load on my pc no more nwo that I'm limited to a GT210
Like bare bones operations are kinda hard now.
lets say "a perfect 1 mm3 cube of most common iron in ambient temperature and pressure" we now can do it perfectly
if you say "its not perfect because there are edge atoms" then you are just a pitty, because we said "iron" and "iron" have these atoms in its definition
doing "better" is contradiction
now the same kind of stuff can be applied to concepts, and then to mechanisms
you have a very narrow view of perfect
your iron cube may look perfect. But it's by no means perfect.
we are not talking about looking here, we are talking about definition of it
the great thing about science, that I feel like too many people disregard:
There's three states for a theory to be in. Proven true, proven false and "we don't know".
If you prove a proof is wrong, it doesn't go to the opposite - it goes back to "we don't know"
again you drift away science by saying everything is only a matter of how we look at it
: no
everything is, and get humble at how you look at it
but how you look at it does not define the very science of it
Yeah, I realized that.
but I just feel like we got different definitions of perfect.
I mean perfect is perfect. "Being entirely without fault or defect"
we never see things perfects, but perfects may things be
we just could not know completly
Adn everything has faults / defects.
until very narrow things
The iron cube can still be destroyed.
that's only you calling it faults
If it was perfect, it wouldn't.
calling it faults that's not science
you are juging abritrary part of your world like a small god
Nah, I am just debating the definition of the word perfect π€£
science is about you can't say it's fault until very defined goal context and people wanting to build the thing
what's the definition of "fault or defect"?
you still talked about what you can idealise yet
Stephen Hawkings: βOne of the basic rules of the universe is that nothing is perfect. Perfection simply doesn't exist.....Without imperfection, neither you nor I would existβ
if the cube is not meant to withstand destruction and therefore functions perfectly as it intended, is it without a fault?
or is it still faulty because it can not withstand destruction?
and that sentence is a paradox, because it is definining perfection as being that thing that can't exist
You two believe what you want, but I am teaming up with Stephen on this one.
I'm teaming with whoever understood that making things actually better, is not just following our ideas about it, but really studying the "world's inherent perfection"
because otherwise then you can just drive yourself nut in your head while fucking everyone down here
because you coudl define whats better all you want for yourself
but that does not work in reality
and then you'll cry people pushed to go to wars against you trying to "make it better"
everyone could become such evil
unfortunately the humain brain seems a bit poorly wired on that side
and it's too easy to loose graps
society will only get better when these "flaws" will get taken into account
and billions people will stop following only one person's will
you mean a bit slow or compeltly chunky ?
could be driver issues Idk, you dont need that much gpu for browsing for instance
only video in 4k may get slow depending on your cpu
I can't browse properly. And drivers cannot be loaded
wdym they can not be loaded ?
Security issuse and even after turning off all the security it still won't load the drivers
what
what security issues
you are running windows ?
latest official driver is 2016
Just use windows default drivers
that's what they are using otherwise there would be no screen
tbh almost 2017 windows 10 64bit release is nice for that old hardware
It's using Microsoft basic display adapter
It's unable to utilize the actual driver
Bc win 11 and old driver doesn't work well
Theres a security feature in core isolation or whatever that you can disable
Which might make the driver work again
Of course, thats also disabling a security feature
Experiment: I have some relatives that haven't touched a desktop computer newer than 2002(at all, literally nothing). They're looking to get something new, and I might set them up with an easy to use Linux distro and see how they handle it since they're coming in fresh
Sponsor: Thermal Grizzly Kryosheets https://geni.us/53ArNb and Thermal Grizzly Hydronaut Paste (Amazon - https://geni.us/Fsray )
Intel released a series of slides in a presentation attacking AMD -- and bizarrely, it was an actually publicly available presentation. The bitter, out-of-character attack reeks of the glue era of Intel. We're not sure...
All wheel steering on it AFAIK.
So rear wheels can be steered too.
That is not that
Mem integrity is off and it refuses to use the driver anyway
Is this GPU like PCI or something
I've had some pretty ancient PCIe cards work with win11 just fine
Yeah back in the days of PCI direct hardware access was the standard for drivers
Win11 effectively runs in a hypervisor/sandbox nothing can directly access hardware from what I remember
Also, the cybertruck wouldn't be allowed in EU AFAIK because it has full steer-by-wire, no physical linkage from steering wheel to front wheels.
Oof yeah thats bad
Steering and brakes need to have manual backup in here.
Manual backup is absolutely needed
But Toyota (and the Lexus "subbrand" have already done the same it seems.
Ah, that was just concept vehicle?
No fucking way wtf
The ranking is like that in multiple games.
The 5800X3D is gaming monster.
Cache size and latency are inversely correlated.
The L1 sizes are limited by the need of very low latency.
I thought it was phsyical location
Make a low latency 8Gb micro package for L1 cahce
EZ maybe in like 20 years
Not directly.
Larger the cache, more intermediate transistors in accessing all the locations.
Which needs more time for the data to go through.
So then the solution would be more low capacity cores with individual L1 caches
Small caches that is
So L0 is tiny, L1 is small, L2 is moderate, L3 is large.
But the latency goes up significantly in each step.
Doesn't help.
L0, L1 and L2 caches are private on most current cores.
Already.
I have not heard of L0 cache, i'm guessing its so small its not worth putting on a spec sheet?
L0i and L0d, the lowest level separate instruction and data caches that are considered to be part of the actual core, unlike even the private caches.
What is generally stored there then since its so small?
I have a couple ideas but you seem like you'd know
The immediate data you are using.
Outside of registers.
With 1 cycle latency (so you get the asked data next cycle already, so no latency)
So it isn't cache in same way as the others, but part of the buffering for the CPU functionality.
Oh so its basically just instruction queue
For the L0i.
Used to actually feed the instruction decode.
But it isn't really talked about outside of core internals deep dives.
And instruction decode is the resulting binary after decoding the assembly I'm assuming? Is the encoding/decoding done per core?
This is a fascinating topic to me and I will probably look more into it once I EVENTUALLY learn x86 assembly
Even the Zen 4 deep dive on chipsandcheese.com doesn't mention the L0.
But AMD does consider it exists, as I have been getting L0 Cache ECC faults when using too large Curve Optimizer offset.
OK, the second part about memory subsystem mentions it as having gotten changes from Zen1+ to Zen2.
No real details.
Wikichip for Zen 4:
L0 Op Cache:
Up to 6,912 Ops per core, 12-way set associative
9 Op line size (restrictions apply depending on instruction type)
Parity protected
Not sure if right and L0 and Micro-Op cache are same thing or not.
Would fit.
I just found something beautiful
What song is this
Protect your privacy babe and don't censor on your phone
And seems I was wrong, EU has created regulations for Steer-By-Wire systems lately?
US didn't have laws requiring mechanical steering based on what I can find.
In the first place, it was just expected.
There have been third party steer-by-wire mods in US since early 2000?
Again the US regulations being patches on patches on patches of reactionary rules.
For example when US mandated driving lights, they mandated everyone to use one of few standardized models.
Europe made regulations for what the effect of the lights can be, and let car makers do whatever they wanted that filled the requirements.
And then those same few standard models were used for AGES in US, until they finally rewrote the regulations to be sane.
I am laughing my ass off atm wtf.
Intel is really seething hard
When they are being beat by not only the 7800X3D for two Gens but also the 5800X3D?
probably forced by the board. they'd rather look like raging idiots & sore losers than tuck their tail between their legs
And that AMD laptop CPU numbering scheme is the first one in ages where you actually can see the core used without checking internet exact spec databases...
Last time before was before rebrands really existed, long, long, long time ago.
That the two first numbers are basically meaningless are requirement from laptop OEMs
Who have been the reason for all the rebrands anyways.
AMD isn't in position to say No to those demands yet.
So they made new numbering scheme that fills the OEMs demands for "new" releases each year, and still give the knowledgeable way to see what is what.
Without having to check each exact model on some database.
Props to Dell for making a metal laptop chassis that still feels extremely cheap
Eh, GN managed to find one of the many titles that scale super well with extra cache.
Other ones in this list are Baldur's Gate 3, MSFS, Factorio, Satisfactory and whatever is the most recent Forza Horizon release (probably the older ones too).
I expect Intel to also spam cache for their next generation of CPUs
Yes, L4 cache is coming to Meteor Lake.
Mostly for the IGP usage as designed in the current mobile chips.
But will see how it affect CPU side.
amd needs better single thread performance to truly beat intel
Single-thread is there, Infinity Fabric and RAM are more the problem.
Problem feeding the CPU if the code is "bad" and cache-trashes.
Which is why the X3Ds make so huge impact in some things.
x3d can also run out
and ive seen some games straight ignore cache
like yes amd has ipc but they cant reach that 6ghz clock
but maybe zen 6 changing layout will make it much better
so far seems like they cant increase l3 size anymore either
Point why the V-cache doesn't help with most number crunching software, as the code has been optimized properly in terms of memory access patterns to not cache trash.
And many games exhibit major improvements.
most numer crunching software probably doesnt need access to massive arrays of different kinds of data on each cycle
The exact access pattern can make 20+x difference in cases.
Where one keeps the "hot" data in cache, and another has cache trashing even for the hot data.
23.12.1 - December 5th, 2023 - AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 23.12.1 Release Notes | AMD
VK_KHR_maintenance5
VK_EXT_frame_boundary
VK_EXT_nested_command_bufferAI and Machine Learning
DirectML improvements and optimizations for Topaz AI and DaVinci Resolve on AMD Radeon RX 600M, 700M, 6000, and 7000 series graphics.
sad trumpet
@dire igloo leberkΓ€ssemmel time
Also DnD just had a major breakthrough
Carbonated healing potions
Don't tell me that while I'm grocery shopping on an empty stomach
Made me run through the store
Nice, now imagine this with a BΓΌgelverschluss (flip top)
germans be like
Germans be making me hungry and its 5 am
central time zone be like
Oh god, I'd hate to have a centralized time for everyone in the world
"Can you call me at 17:00?" - "nope, I'm asleep then, how about 14:00?" - "no, sorry. Breakfast with my family. 03:00?" etc
You have no idea what any time means for a person
You want it 
I think the best we'll get is people knowing their utc offset
Which is a pretty good system...
If you're utc +2 and I'm in utc -4 it's pretty easy to translate
Ugh, at least get a VollkornbrΓΆtchen
IMO every public international announcement should involve either UTC or UTC shift for one of the dates
Heretic
do they finally make any earbuds that mimic 3d positional audio (5.1)
how would you suggest "they" do that?
Same way they do it with over-ears
Which is already possible, using wss or similar
It's just not anywhere near as effective as a true surround setup
right.... see, ears just have the one hole, its how the audio bounces into it, and also the same audio bouncing into the other ear, that our brains determine 'where did it come from' ....
so in theory, they should be able to programatically mimic this behavior out of various small audio speakers in the canal
Phase and volume differences mostly.
So only needs software.
Just that the solution needs to be somewhat calibrated to each individual.
With on-ear headphones works pretty well even without calibration.
That's why wss exists
while earbuds wouldnt be able to produce the "through the head matter" audio subtleties that real 5.1 speakers would produce.... they could get close enough to where you still feel like the sound came from a certain direction
Even most of the "7.1" headphones just do it on software.
yeah
There were some outliers that actually had multiple speakers per ear, but those were worse than just software.
not only where they HEAVY ..... lol
headphones (with straps over head) have always been painful for me to wear for some reason
even my padded puffy studio headphones ... hurt after like an hour
but i absolutely love my 5.1 speakers when playing games, because so many times i'll hear something and be able to turn/flick directly towards the source (and shoot it!) ...
just didnt know where the tech was yet/still with headphones/earbuds
The calibration part for "perfect" solution is because everyones ear canals are little different, that causes the phase & volume changes to be individual to some degree.
So same playback will seem to come from little different direction or just not even work depending on person, with the same headphones.
π€ hmmm ....
But mostly it just works.
something that i wonder if they could allow 'tuning' sliders in a system panel or something
"move this slider till this sound seems like its back-left"
i know my creative audio panel has multiple adjustments so i can make my 2 rear speakers sound a bit more rear than they are physically
also adjusting volumes of each, so the same 'noise' is at the same volume as it spins around me
my 2 'rear' speakers are actually almost directly to my right and left on my L shaped desk ...
The Creative X-Fi generation CMSS-3D Headphone is still the gold standard for HRTF:s AFAIK.
The current Creative one is worse.
The ones in various "HW" solutions are very varied.
And the open source software ones need work to get "right".
Dolby Atmos Headphone is great with Atmos stuff, but does nothing for normal things.
that like the old EAX thing ?
Not directly related.
which i dont think any game uses anymore ....
EAX was about offloading stuff to the sound card and for positional audio input to sound card.
CMSS-3D was then emulating more channels than your system had with that data, or just normal 5.1 or 7.1 input.
And CMSS-3D Headphone was using headphones to play back positional audio so it sounds right.
With just normal headphones.
HRTF, Head Related Transfer Function.
ah
Algorithm doing that conversion from multi-channel sound to just two headphone/earbud speakers so it sounds like you have multi-speaker setup around you.
The Windows Sonic for Headphones is in theory the same again, but just horrible in actual quality.
crazy mess of audio stuff
What is this WSS in this case?
As the opensource thing was HeSuVi
and then there is the libraries that games use ... i keep seeing like 'wwise' for a lot
Windows spatial sound
Same thing as sonic for headphones
some games just get 3d positioning wrong too ... like, a sound in front of you suddenly flips to 'behind' you if you look 'up' .... lol
Yeah, that Sonic for Headphones is just horrible compared to almost anything else I have tested for HRTF...
Corsair's impl was markedly better, but still not that good
Ah, part was this:
Windows Sonic/Dolby/THX - while they work for 5.1/7.1 sources, they do not process stereo sounds at all, so not suitable for music listening.
HeSuVi would in theory be great, but the emulations of the good algos aren't actually that close.
I'm still annoyed that my X-Fi Titanium died and that Creative doesn't have the same tech in the newer cards anymore.
The SBX replacement is just worse.
That's unfortunate
Still better than most, but worse than the CMSS-3D Headphone was.
Which is just weird...
Why...
I'm moving to a new office space and I actually picked up an add-in sound card so I can do 5.1
Why is the best implementation from early 2000s and not available anymore?
ive got a SB-Z .... it suits my needs, better than the onboard realtek shit i have
A lot of things end up that way unfortunately
vehicles
speakers
In theory, set it to headphone output mode, enable Surround part of the SBX.
Tune the setting between 33 and 100 while playing something directional.
what usually confused me... was trying to get something like that working, and doing the 'test' buttons of where it plays a sound coming from each speaker direction, and it doesnt play the rear sounds and i think "well this doesnt work" for the surround out of headphones or whatever settings
If the test is 7.1, the 5.1 card isn't going to play the last two.
i never thought to just load up a game with known 3d sound and play it to see if its working
In some cases.
That is another thing, Creative markets the Sound Blaster Z SE I have as having 7.1 headphone virtualization, but even in headphone mode it shows up only as 5.1 card to Windows.
So no, not possible, just 5.1 even then.
False marketing.
Could be in theory changed with just driver update.
doh
Which is probably part why the SBX Surround Headphone is worse than CMSS-3D Headphone, which had 7.1 input capability, or with EAX games actual full directionality input.
Like with Dolby Atmos now in general.
lol, this rings very true.. I was using an old X-Fi Fatality up until I built the new PC, I grabbed a Strix Soar to use in the new PC, it sucks compared to the ~15 year old X-Fi..
thats what confused me as well .... i bought a brand new motherboard last year that was only a year old motherboard itself in design ...... but its onboard audio sucks compared to my super old SB card that i've been humping across multiple PC builds now for years
SATA drives so big they bulge out?
ah
might be looking for a gaming monitor, needs to be at least 4K HDR 60hz, not bigger than 32 inch... any good suggestions? (Netherlands)
Why do you want 4k at that size?
because id watch movies too on it
And so low refresh rate.
And what is the HDR for?
Because getting actual functional HDR is expensive.
Movies benefit less than games from the resolution
Most monitor HDR is just crap implementations to get add the word in spec sheets.
currently using a sony tv for gaming, but that max out at 100hz
So you want to downgrade?
Probably not even that?
If it was sold as 100Hz TV, it was 50Hz with frame interpolation.
well, i want a monitor so i can play behind a desk, not in a chair 2,5 meters from the screen
as tv is 55inch
What hdr content will you be consuming?
4k blu ray movies and series mostly
And for usable HDR, you need either OLED or at least 150+ backlight zones.
And OLED still has issues with per pixel degradation from usage happening at different speeds depending on things, causing static images to burn in over time.
true
Because that is part of the base OLED pixel tech.
but how do people play on a desk with massive 32 inch screens?
Usually, they're ultrawides
I use two 27in displays that are about arms length
It's not uncomfortable for a wide monitor to be 32in at a desk in my experience
27":s at 80cm for the middle one.
do games (like satisfactory or new games) actually support ultrawide?
Yes
Satisfactorys support is currently broken.
Oh yeah 
yay
But in general starting to be pretty good.
i want a 'square' monitor again... so i can actually see whats above and below me better like i used too
then another question, curved or flat? or that is just personal preference?
The curved 32in I used was quite comfortable, and was 16:9
Flat is better if you're doing most anything bug gaming
Personal.
Personally I hate the idea of curved.
But marketing people have gone wild.
if you sit far back, curved is annoying ... if you sit up close, then curved helps, but you are moving your head a bit more than normal
I am currently using a flat 21:9 display resolution.
i like to be able to sit, motionless, and just move my eyes π
Ahhh yes, them was the days.... lol
Because the curved monitor would need to match in curve to the distance you sit at for it to work right.
And most of them have 1800R radius, as in you would need to sit 1.8m away for that.
There are some newer monitors at 1000r
Flat is the way to go for editing and color accurate work.
But that is a very aggressive curve if you're not sitting at exactly 1m
The shape of the monitor doesn't affect color accuracy
does math in head to convert 1.8meters to inches
about 6 foot
current set-up