#πβoff-topic
1 messages Β· Page 176 of 1
What would a control group look like, you can't raise children just for the sake of a study
I do think it's wrong to point at one thing and say that's the issue, such as technology or cynicism though
It's a pretty complex issue that involves everything in the people's lives
they're mostly comparing against historical data, and kids self-reporting their own computer use
Indeed, but the correlation is hard to deny.
like we could talk about how in the usa there's purposeful disenfranchisement of the education system that's been happening for at least 14 years, or how mental illness is on a rise due to a prevalnce of societal and environmental factors, or how different social media exposure affects people in different ways, etc etc
it's impossible to reasonably measure this
of course gen z uses computers more. in the usa there's very well measured affects of how there's nothing to do but be on the computer.
how does that factor into these studies?
it's frankly fearmongering
We do know there have been actual studies with control groups on very young children (baby to toddler age) that were centered around things like screen time and did show a correlation so I do think it's likely a factor but I don't think it's the whole reason
and y'all are eating it up because you're going "haha kids are so dumb now" and it's not even about people who are kids anymore, and haven't been for years lol
I propose we stop arguing/comparing generations on a "education/intelligence" factor and instead just go "hey wtf why are all the giga rich and powerful people older than dirt, we should do something about that" and figure things out from there
Since they are specifically using a standardized method for measuring and comparing cognitive development across a wide number of different parameters and they all plateau proportional to how much technology is being used as part of educational curriculums.
but the argument is "tech bad for kids"
if you have 20000 kids that say they use computers and social media a lot, and 20000 that say they rarely/never use those things, and there is a statistically significant observable difference in the academic performance between the two groups; sure -- you can't reasonably attribute ALL of the difference to just that, but surely at least some of it is
My takeaway is that modern parents suck.
my takeaway is that people like you with kids suck
particularly if the data matches historical references
Inheritance and time to build wealth, people get their inheritance from their super rich parents when they're also kinda old since super rich people tend to die a bit older
not to even begin to mention the extreme amount of crisis' over the last 20 years that can easily discount the "more schooling" claim
Cyborg I'm trying to incite class war, my man
or how many folk in gen z never go to college because of financial burden, also equating to "less school"
I don't have kids. I would be a terrible parent. If that's the only "parenting" decision I have to make, I think I'm already better than most modern parents lol
or how the ones who DO go to college experience a limited social application from it thanks to the fact that higher and higher college degrees have become "necessary"
how people my age, slightly older and younger have nothing to do.
the problem isn't technology
that's like saying the problem is body heat
"fever kills, body heat blamed"
Airdropping OverWatch psychopathy to be an annoyance because this is ultimately fruitless
me after two glasses of bourbon
Bastion kinda based though ngl
I'm pretty sure Dr. Horvath's collated studies account for income gaps.
This is across all incomes
I'm a Lifeweaver main π
literally nothing i talked about has anything to do with income
it doesn't matter how much money you make
you can't buy your way to social spaces, they're just gone
It's hard to explain away some of these falling measurements with "lack of opportunity" and cynicism, there's actual executive dysfunction.
let's see what happens when you tell an entire generation everything is doomed from birth, remove their ability to be social, lock them in a room with bright screens, tell them they'll die if they leave their house from MANY causes and call them dumb when they have a hard time figuring shit out
YEAH NO SHIT
I get called dogshit after saving our tank's ass 30 times per match and topping out the heals each round on the hero who has a whopping 80 healing per 1.2s charge time π
we're all depressed af, have no hope for the world and are riddled with neurological issues from the extreme trauma of multiple disasters, at least in the usa
Me on soraka π«
everyday i walked into school people were scared i was going to shoot it up
that's real
kids my age at the time thought they'd die at school
pretty much everything you're describing is highly dependent on both the parents and the country
kids my age thought they'd die from covid
i am speaking of the us
my sisters kids (in canada) absolutely did not go through what you're describing, at all
and parents do not factor into this here
This is a meta-analysis of over 80 countries. They show the same trend.
these are things that were taught across the us school system
yes they do, kids that have good parents are not going to think their entire generation is doomed
Make mine look like cartoon villains yeah
we don't think our generation is doomed. we think the world is doomed
I don't :d
then frankly you're willingly oblivious
because the world is doomed
and i'm a positive person
Believe it or not but a significant portion children in the US and indeed the western world live fairly privileged lives with the kind of safe and normal educational opportunities you'd expect.
I think america is doomed, I don't think the world is
We need to course correct dramatically within the next couple decades or we are in fact barreling down a path to ecological destruction of the planet and society yea
this isn't because we put screens in front of kids
in fact, for many years, screens were the only way we could get social interactions
I feel like we're equating two different things
i feel like this is fearmongering bs designed to further disenfranchise generational bigotry and enforce a viewpoint that the younger generations are becoming worse
You're talking about a generation being depressed because of reason x, and the study is saying the generation is dumber because of reason y
not to mention a worldwide aging population and proven biological factors that reduce opinion of younger people the older you become
and i'm saying they aren't dumber
like just as an example, take the subprime mortgage crisis circa 2008; that absolutely WRECKED the us, barely made a dent in canada, because we actually have regulations here
plenty of things that seem like "the end of the world" in the us, don't actually make a significant difference in other countries, because we anticipated those things happening and have plans in place to prevent catastrophe
Now they might be doing worse on tests because they're depressed, that could totally be true. But it would be another factor in the box of factors
canadian banks have never failed, even through the great depression
I do think the study is wrong for implying tech is the sole reason
i am talking about the literal ecological destruction of the earth and its inhabiting species
not a housing crisis
so what if we're dumber?
I really don't lul
I'm in the generation
And I know I'm smart
If you're older than the affected generation, you're dead sooner, shut up. If you're part of the affected generation, who gives a shit, shit sucks and life has a habit of creating misery, make the best you can.
frankly every generation has thought the new one is dumber, and every tech has been blamed for causing it
there's written evidence people were upset about printing because they thought it made people dumber
they literally go over exactly that comment you just made in the video
the video is bs
i think tech has aided a generation that has been failed by their predecessors
not injured by it
People also keep thinking crime is always on the rise and that certain disease are always getting worse when in reality both are often in decline
we can't measure how much "worse" gen z would be without tech
But correlating the two isn't right
but because gen z was the first generation with full access to technology it's obviously linked, right?
studies have been done in isolation to observe the effects of certain types of technology on the brain
you're acting like it's literally just this one group throwing out an insane, baseless theory, and nothing else
when it isn't
not to emntion that a lot of the studied presented from mentioned video are relating to a senator case in the usa. a place that is actively trying to destroy public education, NOT improve it
there's obvious political motivations to be presenting a study like this in such a place
i think i'm done here
goodnight
True. But just because tech does have a proven negative effect doesn't mean it's the sole reason for worse academic performance overall. Tech also has some benefits in that regard. I'm not saying it's not the reason but the study never proves it's the sole/main reason from what I'm reading
the problem as always is a lack of regulation
It's basically just saying we know tech is bad for kids, kids now are using it more than ever and are dumber because of it. Which you shouldn't do
corporate interests aggressively lobby about how great their thing is, and get the government or other groups to adopt it
and they never show any interest in actually demonstrating what parts are beneficial, and what parts are harmful
so it has to be done after the fact
Technology is often misused to replace critical thinking, especially social media. Critical thinking is a developed skill, you aren't born with it. So when standardized methods of measuring cognitive development says Gen Z are performing worse at critical thinking and other learned cognitive skills, it does in fact mean they are dumber, yes.
which leads to arguments exactly like this one
They're not dumb, just dumber on the cognitive development scale.
I agree. But I disagree that you can say it's the only/main reason since there's no evidence of that at a highschool+ level from what I can see. And it's also obviously super hard to test for reliability at that point
no corporation wants anyone to hear that their billion dollar baby is actually harmful; they'd rather people remain ignorant, because changing things costs money
and god forbid their product actually end up banned
I'm not advocating for more tech in schools here, smart boards suck ass man lol
But I also don't think you can say if we get rid of tech our children will automatically go back to being smarter every generation
It might help, it might even result in cognitive growth that we've previously seen
But you can't say that for sure
It might be that there's a different factor that's having an even bigger impact
teachers should be paid more, governments shouldn't just be giving tech corporations mountains of money while forcing the people actually providing the education to suffer
To be fair though the whole thing was basically a presentation saying we should try using less tech in schools since it seems it might be having a negative effect. Which I'm all for
Media is just blowing it up to be tech has made children dumb af
When in reality it was way more reasonable
tbh I don't even necessarily agree with the premise of "less tech in schools" but rather "tech in schools should be required to prove it's actually beneficial and not harmful first, before they get funding"
There's probably many things that could be done to properly integrate tech into education. Part of that is probably paying teachers more as well, so maybe they'll actually care about their students' futures.
hearing about teachers being forced to pay for classroom supplies out-of-pocket is quite frankly completely insane IMO
Yeah that's crazy
when the schools are spending tons of cash on random tech nonsense nobody actually asked for (except for the tech bros)
I think the "bad" use of tech is mainly things like letting kids have their phones during class, showing videos where there could be a demonstration, things like shitty smart boards where it's kinda just annoying to use / look at. Having everyone use a tablet instead of pen and paper etc
Yeah, right off the bat I think students shouldn't be allowed to be in possession of their devices during class IMO
Outside of personal phones it's not that the rest are brainrot, they're just worse than the previous alternative
so much of it revolves around throwing out ideas we know work for learning in favor of experimental stuff that might work, but makes some random guy in silicon valley richer
Yeah
To be fair and credit to my elementary school they tried tablets on my year and nobody ever got a tablet in that school after that year lmao
We hated it, the teachers hated it, everyone hated it
We did eventually get laptops but we still used books alongside them, they were just for writing essays and stuff
And that was in like seventh grade+
other than the basic empathy and desire for wanting future generations to be better, smarter, healthier (yes I know it's unrealistic), my son will grow up in this world, with people from his generation. I want his friends and peers to be the best possible people they can be, not just for themselves, but for what their company might possibly bring out in him too.
is that so horrible a thing?
More than reasonable and I respect the ban on social media too
tbh I'm not really convinced social media bans will ever actually work
They won't
as long as there's something with internet connectivity people will find a way around blocks
I think the proposed discord thing is just silly tbh
I remember reading about kids using google sheets or something as social media, operating like a bootleg forum
because google sheets wasn't blocked at their school
also, yeah previous generations failed their children. Most likely we are too, in myriad ways. Even more likely future generations will too, in their own ways. All of this is more often through inaction than malice. Does that mean that you would actively WANT the next generation to be worse off in any way than you, including intellectually? Most sane people would say no. So this whole argument of "why do you care, you'll be dead sooner and the world is going to hell anyway" is not just caustic, it's disingenuous
Yeah, but while they're younger you can certainly delay their exposure to it and when they're in their teens you can teach them all about it
Imo it should be the parents responsibility to guard their kids against stuff like that, and it's honestly not that hard to do all things considered. The only negative I can think of is your kid getting made fun of for having their phone be parentally locked or something
Which would really suck tbh
written evidence about people thinking printing made people dumber is extremely different from clinical studies proving the negative effects tech use on cognition, not just in youth but also in adults (but worse for youth due to their brains being still in development). This is a complete bad faith argument.
i donβt think it was proven is what i was stating
It has been in very young children
anyway going back to bed
I don't remember the exact study but they've done a few where they basically monitored the babies from birth up to I think a couple years old or so
getting parents in general to be responsible for their kids is a whole can of worms, simply because too many people exist where they only care about themselves, and will oppose suggested changes to their behavior violently
Yeah but I don't think you can force people to be responsible unless you enforce it honestly
The socioeconomic circumstances that some parents live under in some parts of the world, like the US, does make being a responsible parent harder as well. That should be addressed.
Idk in regards to access to social media and stuff I kind of disagree? Obviously I don't like in the US so I wouldn't know but if you get your kid a phone or device putting a parental lock on and checking every now and then can't be that much harder no?
We have a fairly large poverty class
Those are the parents I imagine would struggle the most
Obviously being in poverty is extremely hard but I don't see why it would make it harder to prevent your kid from accessing certain apps or sites, if anything I feel it'd be easier
primary studies:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10353947/ "Screens can improve education and learning; however, too much time spent in front of a screen and multitasking with other media has been related to worse executive functioning and academic performance. As screen time reduces the amount and quality of interactions between children and their caregivers, it can also have an impact on language development. Contextual elements like co-viewing and topic appropriateness are key in determining how language development is impacted. Additionally, excessive screen usage has detrimental effects on social and emotional growth, including a rise in the likelihood of obesity, sleep disorders, and mental health conditions including depression and anxiety."
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0747563220300662 "Children in the high (7.2 h/day; Ξ² = β1.76 [-2.12, β1.40]) and middle (2.9 h/day; Ξ² = β0.82 [-1.15, β0.48]) daily screen time tertiles had lower measures of cognition compared to children in the low tertile (1.2 h/day). Children in the high tertile for TV watching (2.5 h/day; Ξ² = β0.99 [-1.55, β0.64]), video watching (2.3 h/day; Ξ² = β1.05 [-1.43, β0.67]), and social media (1.4 h/day; Ξ² = β0.79 [-1.14, β0.44]) had lower measures of cognition compared to children in the low tertile for each variable (0.3 h/day, 0.1 h/day, and 0.0 h/day, respectively)."
meta studies:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11469-019-00182-2 "We analyzed 44 articles across 16 countries in this review. Each article corresponded to one of four research questions investigating screen time and mental health (n = 13), mental health and substance use (n = 8), chronic stress and development (n = 14), and chronic stress and neurodegeneration (n = 9). Overall increased screen time is associated with negative outcomes such as lowered self-esteem, increased incidence and severity of mental health issues and addictions, slowed learning and acquisition, and an increased risk of premature cognitive decline."
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2821940 " Overall, 100 studies (176β―742 participants) were included, and of these, 64 observational studies (pooled sample sizes ranging from 711 to 69β―232) were included in meta-analyses. Program viewing (nβ=β14; kβ=β48; r, β0.16; 95% CI, β0.24 to β0.08) and background television (nβ=β8; kβ=β18; r, β0.10; 95% CI, β0.18 to β0.02) were negatively associated with cognitive outcomes, while program viewing (nβ=β6; kβ=β31; r, β0.04; 95% CI, β0.07 to β0.01), age-inappropriate content (nβ=β9; kβ=β36; r, β0.11; 95% CI, β0.17 to β0.04), and caregiver screen use during routines (nβ=β6; kβ=β14; r, β0.11; 95% CI, β0.20 to β0.03) were negatively associated with psychosocial outcomes."
this is off of Google Scholar results btw, not rando articles
Yeah but it's not just about moderating tech use either, it's about parenting in general. A lot of parents are simply absent from their child's lives. I don't think that tech (mis)use is the cause, it's a symptom (it just so happens overreliance on tech also undermines cognitive development).
Oh yeah that I totally agree with
no. The poorer people are, the harder it is to find the time to dedicate to parenting, the easier it is to outsource the parenting to tech
Like I said I think there's lots of factors that can lead to children not performing as well, and I think parenting is a pretty huge one
that's why the techbros don't let their kids use social media
because they can afford it
You simply can't outsource parenting, that's not a thing in my mind
sure you can, it just works really poorly
It really is a bit difficult not to conflate the whole discussion of tech and its impact on cognitive development with the circumstances that create this dependence on tech in the first place.
you can, especially if you are ignorant of its consequences
people do it all the time
unfortunately
Well what I'm saying is you're just not parenting at all when you do that
if only people had that kind of clarity
The child isn't getting parenting period, it's not outsourced or something. It's just not being performed
I have seen dozens of parents taking their kids for a stroll in a pram, with the kid using an ipad or mobile or something
it's insane
Yeah agreed
Honestly I wouldn't mind if you could get a ticket for stuff like that lol
Is tech bad? In general, no. Becoming cognitively dependent on tech can be bad because it undermines your own learning processes. Why are kids becoming cognitively dependent on tech? Well, that's a whole other topic.
But you can't enforce that
Thing is for situations where the parents work all day there should be daycares or something available to said parents. As in tax funded programs. Obviously not every country is run that way and not everyone might agree that that should be a thing. But my point is the tech isn't what's wrong here, it's the kids being left alone all day that's wrong
kids being left alone all day is a symptom of a larger problem -- mostly stagnant wages
Preaching to the choir, I'm sure a significant chunk of working class parents in the US would strongly agree with you.
lots of parents literally can't afford to do anything more -- they're working two jobs and barely making ends meet, etc
Luckily it's the case here. But yea
I mean, nothing in the original content held the kids at fault. Kids CAN'T be at fault by virtue of being kids.
It was an observation of a problem
My point was that tech isn't at fault
Some tech is at fault.
I meant in that specific instance
Social media, for example
If something is designed to be addictive and overload your brain with dopamine, that IS malicious
A child being left alone all day every day is bad for them regardless of if they have access to a phone or not
Your device may not be at fault, but TikTok is.
Phone might make it worse (idk, prob) but it's bad regardless
So generally that's not how it works right
I'll give you a personal example
Sometimes my kid drives me insane because he's being ultra cranky and not eating and not playing and generally throwing a tantrum
In this situation, I very occasionally let him watch Ms Rachel on the TV from a distance of like 9 feet, for around 15 mins
So I can take a breather
Now I'm a stay at home dad with a flex work schedule and my wife takes over in the late afternoon so between us we manage, and never let him watch too much TV
But imagine single parents in that situation, especially ones working more than one job
Suddenly that 15 mins ends up becoming a few hours
My point is there should be a daycare or someone that can be with the kid for those people during that time
tech is a means to an end
it's not the issue itself
the issue is parents cant be with their kids enough
not tech
Yeah, I'd probably file that under "socioeconomic issues"
yea
But a lot of tech is designed to be far worse than it could be, due to the nature of how tech operates
Yes, and this is where tech is at fault, I agree.
Things like social media, TikTok etc
E.g. what is stopping the production of children's shows that are soothing to young brains and encourage learning and interactive play?
The answer - the tech revenue model
Like in a world where a parent has to work 18 hours a day 7 days a week, even if tv's and phones didn't exist that kid would still be way worse off cognition wise because they're just not interacting with other humans or intellectually stimulating things enough
Yeah they're just made to get as many views as possible
A lot of tech is designed to encourage self-destructive behaviors, for sure.
stuff like cocomelon is crazy lol
in a world where everyone is on the same page when it comes to the importance of parenting, parents would only work 30 hours a week max; exactly the same amount of time their kid spends in school, and spend the rest of their time at home, available to actually raise their children
Yeah so all that is "the system working as intended"
Which is awful
And very much the fault of tech
Now, tech can be used strictly for education and wellbeing as well
So tech inherently isn't bad
You see my point though right @warped wren . Even if none of the tech we're talking about existed if a parent can't spend any time with their kids because of work and there are no tax funded daycares/programs to act as substitute the kid is kinda screwed either way
tech or no tech
Of course
so tech might be making it worse
I mentioned this in the other server too right
but it's not really the core issue in that instance
tbf the video doesn't go over a lot of the other problems also contributing to cognitive decline like intentional/unintentional absent parenting, misinformation, choice paucity, crumbling social support, shrinking communities, etc.
Ah I didn't read the convo there
We basically just live in a society that encourages parents to defer their parenting to tech.
It's how my past life is screwed and why endless exams is the only thing I'm living for
Just grow up with lots of confusion :)
Like I grew up watching stuff like cartoon network and nickelodeon and honestly all things considered I wouldn't mind my kids also growing up watching stuff like that, even for a few hours a day. But for stuff like social media and way more faced paced content it's kind of a hard no for me lol
I'd restrict them from it for as long as possible
Social media is an interactive tool that slowly erodes your ability to critically think.
It embodies the "appeal to authority" fallacy where the authority is often whoever is the most charismatic person at the time.
Basically the same thing that happens whenever you democratize opinions.
Idk about other languages but for English and Hindi there's relatively little content that I'd reasonably encourage my kid to watch
You are old enough to start reworking your life now, if that's what you'd like.
Meh I'm a believer that shielding your kids from absolutely everything with even a hint of bad is also not a great idea, it's kinda like being a clean freak. A little bacteria is fine. Not everything needs to make them smarter or something, they can watch things that are just there for entertainment as long as it's not like a lot of todays viral content where it's super fast, insanely stimulating etc
There's a lot of super long running cartoons and stuff
I think controlling exposure is a good thing for childhood development tbh. It's more about exposing and confronting on your own terms.
At some point, you can't stop your kid from getting access to things, I'd say maybe in their early teens.
But until then, you very much can shield them reliably from certain influences.
yep which is why I said i'd try to restrict things like social media for as long as possible, I accept it's impossible to do so completely past a certain point without becoming toxic which is why I think a less all or nothing approach is better since by not making it a poison apple hopefully your kid won't try to go against you to taste it
trying to restrict something too much often has the opposite effect
I'd rather introduce them to stuff myself even if that thing is bad than have them go behind my back to it
Social media and the internet in general isn't something any parent is going to be able to restrict once a kid is in their early teens and at that point it probably makes more sense to teach them about it and why they should be cautious with it.
exactly
But until then, definitely agree on as little exposure as possible.
Yeah Imo until like highschool I'd be fine with my kid having a flip phone rofl
High school is brutal, lmao I might even say the later years of middle school
That's what I meant, most kids content is like that now
(highschol is 12-15 here)
Oh yeah I agree, there isn't a lot of good stuff coming out nowadays
but there's a pretty big backlog
I think a good parent would make sure that the first time their child learns about social media, it's because the parent taught them about it.
yep
I mean tbf I didn't have social media until around highschool and I only made accounts because my friends wanted me to lol. I've always been someone who doesn't really use it
and in this instance what I mean by social media is stuff like instagram, snapchat etc
not so much youtube and stuff
I dunno, gotta be carefeul with YT as well, plenty of opinions on there too.
Oh yeah for sure, I just meant that I didn't have any accounts on those other things until then but I was watching youtube before then
I think the single worst innovation in human history has been the endless feed
I didn't wanna say I didn't touch any social media at all until then since that'd be a lie
Incalculable damage
I never really thought about that but it's kind of true lol
I remember when the default place to go to on youtube was the sub page and not the home page
better times
When I'm being a degenerate browsing through some social media website, it's always that endless feed that prevents me from getting out of bed and doing something.
back then either something new you were interested in since you were subbed to the channel popped up and you watched it, or there was nothing new and you just clicked off. Now you keep searching forever in the home page lmao
What I found works kinda decent is using the "newly uploaded" filter on youtube
and heavily utilizing the "not interested" and "don't recommend this channel" buttons lol
I hate that those are even a thing. YT has gotten so bad with recommendations.
Yeah it's not about giving you what you want
it's about making you stay on the site
Can't find the message that mentioned cocomelon on ytkids
it's bad, yeah
but at least it's not as bad as the weird elsa + spiderman vids
πππππ
Never a bowl of cat food is huge like that
Ngl I don't have kids and I'm obviously too old to have ever watched that stuff so I'm wildly unaware of what's going on in the kids section of youtube lol
What's the point of this video lmao, there's no way those 6 cats eat all that no? xd
I don't think I can even begin to explain those videos here on this server without the messages being caught by the word filter
Yeah honestly I think I'd be better off not knowing too
Just.. weirdly sexual
and bondage
Yup
And I don't have kids either
but a friend mentioned it at some point so I had to check it out
Also some people reupload some tv shows that are for kids
but edit in a screamer in the middle of an episode
Yeah idk from what I've seen and heard the entirety of youtube kids is just a clickfarm basically
it's just no effort content being spammed
I think you can heavily filter it as a parent or something but is there even anything worth filtering for lol
Damn I just bought a pig at auction while riding a pig as a kid by selling tin buckets, this game is lit
I'm now also broke and don't know what to do with the pig
What game is that?
Kynseed
I see
never heard of it before
I was going to say it reminds me of stardew valley
Yeah a bit
It's kinda in that region but it's not really about anything specific like farming
you can farm, but you can also be a blacksmith, apothecary etc
and your character gets old and dies
but if you marry and have kids you can keep playing as the kid
the villagers also age and die
seemed like a neat concept
apparently all that is like super slow though
not like a few hours of gameplay and your guy dies of old age
Another day, more finger poking for the sensor trial 
I really ask myself why I agreed for another trial period
for what?
Glucose sensor
for diabetics
Well
the app shows wrong values every time I actually measure it
the notifications on it don't work on my phone even when it has all the permissions (their customer support was confused by this and so far they haven't contacted me back in 2 weeks)
so if my blood levels dropped during the night it wouldn't wake me up with alarm about it
Sounds like it's kinda useless no?
are you able to use a different one that works at the same time?
And I kinda have bad memories about poking holes in fingers for tests from time I was a kid
because some nurse did that test on every finger at the tip of it where it's the most sensitive
Oh yea, the first 2 weeks of the trial period you wear the one you were originally using and make comparisons between them + what actual blood shows
then the 2 other weeks it's supposed to be only the new one.. but I think I might just put in the old one too
oh and the first 12hours of using the new sensor it even says that it's not showing accurate numbers, you can't use these for actual medical purposes, you need to calibrate it. which becomes available after 12hours of wearing it. So in my case it was at midnight but obviously didn't do it at midnight
So when I mentioned that 12hours to some other diabetic folk they were like "that's useless, wtf"
yeah that sounds crazy lol
Also a massive pro for this game is that you don't need to do any inventory managment, you have an infinite categorized inventory which is lit
Like the other sensor I was testing out last year?
It was actually nice, apart from the first day it was showing weird values but then it got kinda accurate
and you could calibrate it but didn't need to unless it was still showing weird stuff
The thing is, we get these for free from the healthcare but they decided to ask prices from other companies than just the original one (and made sure they knew it) and... the original one increased the prices.
I honestly wouldn't be surprised if they just went with "okay enough" sensor that's cheaper
wtf they wrote dialogue for if you bought a pig in the prologue
I didn't expect that tbh
Yeah I guess it's the price you pay but it sucks regardless
would be nice if you were testing actually nice tech instead of crappy stuff lol
good products need testing too
Nice touch
Tbh I would've expected it
Idk if you only do what it says you wouldn't have nearly enough to win the auction tbh
and they don't even tell you to attend the auction really
Yeaah
the nurse that's been taking care of me at the ward asked me if I wanna do it
And I have a hard time saying no to her
But at least the testing isn't as bad as I originally thought
Because originally I thought you'd have to do it before & after every: breakfast, lunch, dinner and before going to bed, every day of the trial period
but it's only total of 6 days and no need to do it before lunch
Oh it's not one of those that's constantly monitoring?
or do you mean checking that it's correct / comparing values
It is constantly monitoring
But need to compare the values & write it down
so when I then send the papers forward they can look at the numbers & feedback I wrote about it
Gotcha, makes sense
Also I'm glad the pen that pokes the hole has multiple settings for how deep it pokes
the first one is enough for me and doesn't even really hurt
I have no idea what I'm doing, campaign seems too easy for a randomly-thrown-together build lol
Which game is that?
Torchlight Infinite
Right
I thought it's that but I never ended up trying it
It's not bad, very PoE-inspired in systems design
I tried it and bailed after like 3 hours, too much pay2win nonsense + atrocious mobile UI design IMO
Might be a better handheld experience like a Steam Deck, but also it plays good on a phone too lol
I know there's pay2win but I'm not knowledgeable enough to really gauge the significance of what you can pay for in terms of how it translates to power. I know the game comes highly recommended from @twilit mountain who is free-to-play, I think.
also remember a lot of the text being borderline unreadable nonsense, I think it was translated from chinese to english and never reviewed by a human; might be better now though
IIRC torchlight infinite has two layers of pay2win: paid pets that significantly boost the quantity of loot you get (like 4x or more, idk exact numbers)
and new hero stuff each league is super OP and only available for $$$
you can farm niche/obscure mechanics as a free player and sell that stuff to p2w players to circumvent the loot problem partially, mechanics that aren't affected by loot pets basically
Yeah the paid pets is kinda pushing me away from it
I might still give it a shot to try it out
the big drama I remember was maxroll dropping support for TLI
Baby pig
Hah, crazy. Why'd they delete the post?
dunno, I think it just got purged at some point
Weird, you'd normally want to keep that for SEO
I wonder if they got pressured into taking it down.
A2 is the only one I recognise, but Iβve never had powdery milk before We just have normal milk
They did some napkin math too on the estimated impact, not bad
I wonder how applicable this all is in the current season of the game.
Bacon and legs is hacking
I think I can save 50.38USD/348RMY if the gameplay of Resident Evil Requiem as similar as Resident Evil 4
This lady sure does yap a lot
9 more days to wait
oh damn damn damn Mr. Beast's leaser challenge is too fun to watch
Like... ||3s for you to touch the box only in a random moment|| within 10h 
Isn't MrBeast wrapped up in several controversies/scandals? Seemed like bad stuff happen around him.
wow guaranteed 40000USD or 33% chances for 250000USD. It's a hard choice...
He don't come to Bilibili until 2025 so he still popular in China
Yes
including some of his challenges having people have issues with medicals and he's like "lol nope you're not getting stuff"
Also a very close associate of him being accused of something highly inappropriate and resigning in response.
Yup
MrBeast basically... sounds like a bad person.
Honestly
I think that to get that big there's something shady
Also he never has an actual smile on his face
If you cover his mouth and only look at the eyes he's not smiling at all
Maybe he practices smiling without wrinkling his eyes :P
Haha yeah sure.
Also I generally don't trust people who do "charity" and go saying "look at all this good I'm doing, let me make videos out of it"
(As in, have skin care routines and practice)
the controversies section on his wikipedia article has 8 different sub-sections
not a good person indeed
he's just some random guy that got rich by appealing to children on youtube, and accepting deals from advertisers to put their products in front of said children
The list of controversies could be revealing a pattern of behavior
Removal of Ava Kris Tyson
This is the one I was referring to earlier, this one seemed real bad.
Can't forget first trying to protect that person
apparently his entire business model was just: slowly work his way up to the point where he gets sponsorship worth $10,000 => give away all that money => lots of people watch the videos related to said giveaway => next sponsorship is even bigger => repeat giveaway process until billionaire
They were "best friends" and long-time collaborators, it's hard to believe he wasn't aware.
ohhh my lord the ending is quite unexpecting... I'm sorry, Blake
are people who get disqualified in his show turn into human meat for his burger chain
why not his chocolate π€
Nah, they're made into his terrible tasting chocolate
nice
Oh he's still in an on-going class action lawsuit with 5 contestants from his show.
In September 2024, five former contestants on Beast Games filed a class action lawsuit in Los Angeles County Superior Court against Donaldson, Amazon, and the show's production partners. They alleged chronic mistreatment on set, including sexual harassment, unsafe conditions, and unpaid expenses. The plaintiffs also said they were pressured to sign illegal contracts and submit false paperwork in order to secure Nevada tax credits for the production.
This is still on-going.
Five contestants seem to think they have a case lol
Hopefully they do
Yeah, the conditions being described on that show sound really bad if true.
Also tax credits stuff is usually taken relatively seriously
2h after-dinner walk time
The last night to act freely without controling of parents so it's the most happy one in this holiday β€οΈ
Whew, TLI is a difficult game to put down once you get going lol
Just climbed up from one side and climb down from the other side, it remind me of another childhood memory, it's about... Fear the height so I never can defeat the iron ladder πͺ
My fear for the height only disappear when I want to die
These ladders in my childhood memory have double-sided handle at the peak so you can climb up and climb down from different sides if you're brave enough
Climb up is no problem, but climb down is quite scary lol
huh, that's quite strong fear of heights
mine kicks in at about 40m above the ground I think
happened to me twice, once when touring a lighthouse, the other time was industrial chimney
Had fear too. Noticed it got less the more I faced it and combined it with fun, like climbing a tree.
Enjoying lamb skewers as my night snack now :) The special point is skewers are red willow branches :)
Ah, i too love to snack on lamb skewers as a night snack
Mine is when I look down
Is it the case for this server too? Since the company is an AI first
I can climb a hill or mountain relatively ok but the descent is scary af
me when people invent a slur very clearly based off a real, very problematic slur during a time where the people said slur are directed towards are actively being prosecuted for their existence
like no duh this is banned
they still hiring humans
itβs not offensive because of its use toward ai, its offensive because itβs obviously a stand in for a real thing
not to mention that it doesnβt matter if the ai has feelings. letβs not say slurs thx
clanker is a slur originally from a 1958 article describing robots in Metropolis, and more recently from star wars, used to refer to battle droids
I have no idea what you think it's meant to be other than that tbh
oh my gods
itβs being used an allegorical way to say the n-word
thatβs what itβs used for in social media
the memes about βclankersβ often reference things that are stereotypically tied to black americans, except being done by robots
uh, okay, that's certainly one interpretation
this isnβt hard to grasp and there are studied linguistic effects about artificial slurs
I got no problem with clanker, it's used in tech all the time now to refer specifically to AI.
for reference, this is social media, and I've used the term clanker, and never even considered it in that sort of context
jfc
then youβre very lucky
i see it all the time
hell βwirebackβ is another one
do i need to explain that
Certainly nobody at work has ever objected to "clanker" on grounds of it being a slur or derogatory towards humans.
And we're a tech company.
jfc
you're literally the first person I've heard even suggest there's a link to the N-word like this
Same, and I'm chronically online.
the usage and normalization of this language is obviously problematic especially when it is in fact being used as a loan word in other contexts
and I've known about the term since it was used in star wars, circa 2005
I subscribe to tons of tech feeds and clanker is a widely used but innocuous term.
adam aleksic described it as an evolution of racial slur targeted at βai systemsβ instead, with clear roots in reality
even βrobotβ has ties to problematic usage
I have never paid a single dollar for pet pulls, in total I've spent like $60 across about 900 hours of playtime over I think 4 years and it's been exclusively on season passes to give some support. I have done all content in the game on several heroes and have multiple "big" pets that I have acquired completely free.
You can farm pretty much any mechanic even without pets, they're all still perfectly viable for money, what is being seen as "niche/obscure" is actually just the dev team screwing up and making an off-beat non-mechanic way too good lol
Also the new hero is a literal coin toss every time on if it will be good or not. The current one is a speed demon but calling it made of glass would be a compliment of the highest order.
I have (and I'm not trying to pull the I have a 'brown' friend card to justify this btw) a friend who uses that word all the time referring to ai. Honestly this is the first time I've heard it as an alternative way of saying the nword. I will ask him when I get the chance to see what he thinks.
literally never said it was an alternative way
nobody but the criminally insane is going to use it to try and harm a person of color
i said it has clear problematic roots in such language
Thinking of call my pet project "Clanker City" tbh
i hate you
you are a very negative person
iβm rly not
Tons of repos with "clanker" in the name or description
literally what does github have to do with anything
what does github have to do with a linguistics problem
I see, so it's not a matter of being offensive then.
Because GitHub actually changed the default git master branch from "master" to "main" to appease these sorts of arguments.
But seemingly clanker is not on their radar.
Definitely is lol
again, i am truly not
I think y'all are misinterpreting. It's not a stand-in, it's due to what people are doing with it along with the "alternatives" they have invented for it.
Like. You cannot seriously believe you don't see that people are eagerly "inventing" "slurs" based in actual real world prejudice because these ones are "clean" when there's people throwing "wireback" or "Rosa Sparks" for example.
fr
not to mention that by assigning a βslurβ to a non-thinking, non-feeling demographic you ironically elevate their empathetic stand in to that of real people
despite the fact that these robots have no brains or feelings
you can use practically anything as a slur, that doesn't assign any value to the thing you're disrespecting beyond what you would assign to it by simply referring to it at all
deias can confirm that i am one of the most positive people around, in fact! you folk just make me go insane
It's... not about assigning value to anything. It's a situation of "why are people chomping at the bit to say even pretend slurs"
why do you guys need to say a pretend slur for something that doesnβt think
because they don't like AI and want a short way to voice their dissatisfaction or displeasure with that thing
not to mention the articles i linked go over the things youβre saying βnuh-uhβ to
it's not complicated
Just call it fkin stupid. Easy. Christ.
yeah so thatβs a slur.
Because it's amusing. Humans have done far dumber and crazier crap for amusement (much of which is also considered innocuous)
and I read the articles, I don't get what you were trying to communicate by linking them
itβs amusing to you
Yes, it amuses me.
probably because you wanna say slurs tbh
like yes, clanker is a slur, that was established more than 50 years ago
Yes, I want to pretend say slurs.
why the hell do you want that
doesn't have anything to do with the N-word
I'm just going to back out of this, y'all kinda suck. Dream, get out tbqh.
the n-word shares etymological structure with the word clanker thatβs proven to invoke illicit affects and normalize the usage of other similar sounding words
<@&1161418687471956101> things are getting a bit heated here
Because it has no measurable harm to people and it makes big bad AI companies upset.
it does have measurable harm when people are now comparing robots to people of color
πΏ
I reject the assertion that the term clanker normalizes other non-robot slurs
yeah iβma go shower
I'm a chronically online person and I've never heard this connection until you mentioned it.
you're just saying it does with zero evidence
most people aren't even going to make that sort of connection; if they did it would have been an issue back when star wars first did it
i suggest you read the articles i linked and actually think about them
Toaster is another good one. Gotta love Battlestar Galactica
Guess the word clanker about to be banned in this server 
yeah, nope
I just completely disagree with the assertion that it's in any way dependent on or linked to the N-word
cool
But I think Toaster works better for sentient bots
Alright. It seems this conversation has ran its course so we're going to put a stop to it here, if you don't mind so nicely.
Does that come with a ban on the word "clanker" lmao
That comes from a genuine ask to stop this top and avoid anything that start it back up.
thank you vandryll
i appreciate you mediating the topic
it was obviously argumentative on every end
Sounds like we're clearly not banning the word, thankfully.
anyway did you take a picture kirra? i love lamb but i havenβt had it in like, a decade
i think that usage of it would fall under βstarting it back up againβ
iβd say for safetyβs sake you donβt say it
mostly because iβm not sure how much clearer vandryll can be
That's not quite true, Vandryll shut down the argument. He didn't ban the word.
I have no reason to argue.
And you are free to ignore those of us who choose to say the words we want to say.
dude why is it so hard to just go βokay wonβt do it againβ
Megacrit left us with a cryptic message and I can't lie but I think it's in regards to the Defect coming back
I won't argue with you about this. I'm trying not to, maybe you should stop.
This! I could eat it every day, but it's quite expensive.
π.
As an attempt to change the topic: I've seen kirra talk a few times in here about some "free day" coming up, but I have no idea what that actually refers to. Anyone have insights on that?
Think she's trying to move so she lives on her own
It's gotta be defect man
Damn, that's kinda awesome.
you kinda are trying to tbh
it looks so small
Seriously, stop.
thatβs so little food
If you feel that way, I encourage utilizing the /ignore feature, it's okay.
I hate ignore. One of the reasons being I end up clicking 'show message' again haha.
It does suck that it still shows up, I agree.
I just block anyone I dislike or disagree with
i think that trying to limit yourself to one perspective is a great way to end up single minded, hating young people and with little understanding of the world
and that by simply removing dissenting opinions you do exactly that
As nub said, I want to move to a new city in March, that city calls Taiyuan. The shortest distance between Taiyuan and the city I'm living now, GuangZhou, is 1638km :)
itβs a good way to stop evolving as a person
I would hate to miss out on context, especially on the more active people having convos with others. Also I think it's disrespectful, even tho I disagree or something. Everyone can have a bad day. Maybe I'm just not that sensible (I am) haha
I agree, exposure to opposing viewpoints is crucial to self-improvement.
Yep, I am also a very curious person, that's probably reason nr. 1
It can only benefit you to learn someone else's perspective. Maybe it changes your view on something or maybe it teaches you more about your opponents.
only ever blocked one person in another server. he is there for 3y, 4months and wrote:
not to hate on him or anything.
Shrug.
I don't need to bother checking I think because there's a bunch of bots in there
....
Plenty of bots. Plenty of people I just do not want to talk to. If you annoy me or irritate me often enough, odds are you go on the list. Because ultimately I'm looking for people I enjoy talking to, nothing more or less.
MEE6 bot is one of the only accounts I've blocked on discord, because that damn thing is everywhere and pings me all the time, it's infuriating lol
Fair, Discord doesn't have to be a place for intellectual growth. Arguably, it might even be a bad place for such a pursuit.
"you've levelled up" thanks MEE6, very helpful ping
Funnily enough my approach to "ignore" is a bit different
Instead of using the function, I actively ignore the person in the thread
Especially while they're talking to me
Watching them spiral because of that rage is a sight indeed
I guess there is one actual person I blocked
some guy kept spamming in the diablo subreddit server about being "rank 1" all the time
flooding multiple channels with complete nonsense
and he was technically rank 1.. on xbox or something, very briefly.. so it's not like he was lying, he was just super annoying about it
Reminds me of one guy on poe forums
always making posts how he's the top racer, better than Ben but just doesn't have the time, ggg should pay him to race
and then when ppl checked that during like
one of the infinite delve races he had placed in like top 10 as chieftain he put his profile private and started reporting evreryone calling him out
holy, I just looked him up and he's still doing it; he has videos on his YouTube channel from 7 days ago screaming about being rank 1
surgicalsnipes, the man, the myth, the legend
lol, made a planet with a giant crater in the middle and made all the food grow near the cliffs with predators lying in wait at the bottom of the crater
There was this game I played on the PS2 as a child, where you had a quadratical piece of land (purely sand) floating in space and you had to build walls in an efficient manner, before some water fell down, which you had to stop from falling down. I sadly don't remember what it's called, it had familiar artstyle to this one above.
It was really fun. It's about time I play it again, but don't have a copy.
Oh, I found it, it's Aqua Aqua.
Aqua?
I loved to play with water as a kid. I guessed the game will mostly appeal through it's nostalgic value nowadays, but looking up gameplay, it's really similar to 3D Tetris. Could be fun still!
I'm confused where these black blocks should on π€
Especially black 3 here
Seems that this puzzle is a pixel tree
I have no enemies 
Hence the "dystopia"
The beginning of this puzzle (current status) spent 2h 
oh damn, now it sounds fun
π₯± Muscle are quite stiff and serious... Shower time
My people are starving to death... the only thing holding this nation together is unrestricted immigration lmao
ahh, I love Songs of Syx
Steep learning curve, but very fun indeed.
I don't mind steep learning curves, it makes things easier for me rather than focusing on microimprovements π
I am not a good leader 
you can't make an omelette without breaking couple million eggs
Oh nah, we're not having any of that here
on the side note I do love the fact the game starts in around bronze age
you are building an ancient city state, and it does include some messed up things as well π
I'm going to give Horizon hunters gathering props for not making a pvp game
Still won't play it though
me neither most likely, survival games are already stacked
I've returned to Valheim some time ago, and did not age for me that well .__.
Enshrouded, Grounded and VRising are probably some of the top survival games for me.
OH, and Abiotic Factor
Unlocked the new character in LORT
Oh man he deals so much dmg. I was honestly kinda hoping it would be a poison based rogue instead of critting but i guess i'll take it
@fierce moth how accurate is this
Or is this just some messed up and utterly cooked meme (which may be possible because i see Korean and Vietnamese terms alongside Chinese)
I might be biting off more than I can chew lol
...I'm woke up by the quilt is too thick (too hot)
Alright turn off the ac is a serious mistake I made
Only 4 things left, firecrackers, red envelopes and relative asking personal questions and my cousin is more successful than me
smh, Claude trying to tell me my code is wrong then I gotta correct his ass
And businesses are building mission critical apps with this tech lmao
Good morning, 14 days left before the free day
Need to say goodbye with this hotel room before 12:00. The bed is so comfortable, much more comfortable than the bed at home... I must find a bed like that to sleep when I find apartment in Taiyuan soon :)
I'm skeptical that a source of reliable income has even been secured lol
Not that I made better decisions when I was younger. Some lessons are just learned the hard way.
this is only tangentially related but i canβt imagine the road dog community in china is very vibrant
not like it is in america
No, just escape 2 night for avoiding the noise of firecrackers
My aunt family come to my home today for a dinner. I must come back home to help on preparing.
I can sympathize with wanting to avoid firecrackers. Delhi gets insane around Diwali.
What's this "free day" you talk about, I missed the initial cutscene π
Nothing you miss, because I don't cook that yet 
Alright, the price of desktop rtx 5070 ti + i9-13900 + 2k screen is over than a rtx 5070ti laptop already... I don't need new ram and SSD though
π laptop is the only choice
be careful with the amount of VRAM card has, laptop versions can have only 6GBs instead of 8. And for new stuff you need 8
Laptop 5070 also isn't the same as a desktop card anyways they just name it like that to attract people
Pet them for me too, thanks
.....First time to meet a game demo can't be played without signing up an account
Bazaar is quite fun indeed. It's like advanced version of ftk 2 
Inherit all pros and remove all cons from ftk 2
Damn fun, win 7 times in 7 days now. I should buy this game
I think Bazaar can be the next game let me be addicted for hundreds of hours
Red envelopes are like that
Context: Β₯50 count as a decent chunk of money here. Cantonese usually spread small amounts of money inside for blessing only. But Β₯500+ per red envelope are common in the north of China 
I like the sandstorm setting the best so far
It avoid the battle time last too long so well, excellent. Because it's the annoying point I feel in turn-based strategy games
The 2nd interesting point: I need to decide which size of item worth to keep. Small, medium or large. Will it worth the position? How much value it can bring? How to max offense by limited position etc
Which debuff/buff combo can you go by random weapons you get is the core
Debuff + buff let the game more fun xd
π€ I'm confused how to defeat bosses with strong shield/life regen now
The only way is freeze?
the bazaar π₯
poison can beat enemy's life regen/shield
what generosity skill is?
lol the game give me a red envelope too (I don't know should I get this red envelope or reroll)
Oh nevermind. The game allow me to do both
.........Reduce 1 gold only π π
many items I don't know but this is actually cute lol
lol crit-1392hp... Bosses are too insane
there was a list about them,
and some bosses counter your builds but you need to experience it first π
?... Complete 10 days is a game? Alright I'm not play enough π
π sorry I don't know why it's fair
689 damage + crit chance is insane
689 is small damage but pygmalien counters this boss very good
so many healing items for pygmalien and shield
other bosses are generally difficult for every characters
but this is pretty good
good job kirra 
if you don't get enough poison items to build a combo, aren't bosses which with insane healing invincible?
I max my crit chance in this combo (start from aquatic items)
yes, this is why choosing easy bosses matters
there is a boss with shield
If you choose it for example, you can't beat it because it will gain shield even you crit
π€ Interesting...
it's learning the game, when you learn all monsters, you will get more wins π₯³
So I need to remember which bosses can regen hard
yep 
but it's easy to remember, I am pretty sure, you can memorize it better than me lol
just look at the arts of the bosses, they have same builds everytime
Which difference will different characters bring?
characters have different items and general items
pygmalien has regen and shield items,
mak has poisons
do you mean debuff and buff they can use are different?
yes and characters have different skills
so some builds will be better on different characters
but your character venessa is good with crit builds
it is good choice
because so many weapons
lol what a coincidence then
this game is so good If you want to relax
I think you will like it more once you have other characters
and game soundtrack is so peaceful π
lol ok the 2nd red envelope I get. Let me see which gift can I get
more gold 
bar of gold and chocolate bar
Fine, red envelope in this game is quite... expected 
https://playthebazaar.com/patch-notes it looks like Red Envelopes will stay in the game for 2 more days and new venessa skin? 
Alright I see what the exclusive feature of this characters is... Value
he is carrying gold chest, he is good with gold interest
and he is big, he has more health
I find lots of shield-relevant items too
I tried wink encounter (upgrade all items randomly) and it's before VS after.
284 damage from a small weapon?!
it's not like every big items will deal big damage
aquatic items for example
you can make venessa build with small gun and dealing 1000+ dmg
once you learn the combos, oh boy oh boy 
I won't spoil anything from now on, you need to figure them out 
Select the hardest trap, damn quite close :(
the boulder, oh no
I have no idea which trap should I select
it is OTK build which means when the boulder is activated, it kills the opponent with one shot
unless shield
lol this game allow me to make mistakes in combats with any bosses/encounters, it's great
It don't affect me to get consistent victory at least
yeah, you don't lose directly
you still have chance to comeback
and it's good for learning the game β€οΈ
lol the other one-shot boss come quickly
kirra is neverlucky
Don't find quite much fun from this character because increase value is a hard thing
Don't think I can win if I'm not luck on wick encounter. No idea which combo can I build on the whole process
there are more items you need to see and some items are very rare. you need to visit diamond merchants and you need to have gold
but I believe in you, even you say that, you are getting 10 wins everytime 
emmmmm... DLC are quite expensive
I want to try Stelle (ingenious engineer) the most
you can unlock it with gems but you need to open chests from battle pass or ranked tickets
each day you have 1 free ranked ticket
Just purchased Stelle
nevermind me
Won 9 cosmetic chests, opened all of them, got a legendary album calls entrepreneur, but it can't be found in my collection. What the hell
(I even figured out how to open chests for a while... No one tell me I should drag a chest to the platform π )
https://store.steampowered.com/app/2870350/Pipistrello_and_the_Cursed_Yoyo/ this looks super fun
π First time to be failed. Aquatic sets, make sense why I'm defeated
π€ Tech weapons can't play debuff is annoying
enemy has 20 hp π
π€ The game start to be laggy hard after run it 4h
Clicked an icon multiple times but no respond, or the battle didn't run
The game feel tired earlier than me lol
Fane, did you saw the second trailer of He-Man?
Nope
Kirra, I am so happy for you, you can totally make it and live there, even when it's 1200km away from home. Your mental will get better from abscence of problematic relationships and perhaps this will cure the relationship on both sides too. Just a little potential sideeffect. But don't forget it's normal to have drawbacks, which can happen. So don't be too harsh with yourself in your new life!!
Tomorrow is red envelope day, which mean I must consume the whole day and 4h at night on "regular work" (no sense and mad for me) for keeping family relationships...
But it maybe a good time to start to figure out which start scene do I want after I reached. Zao gave a good direction π€
Well, that's not something you want to see in your YT feed lol
it's not though, which you'd know if you had seen the video
title is slightly clickbait though but that's par for the course these days
Discord can lick [redacted] for all I care
the issue with this stuff, whether Discord does it or YT does it or the UK / Australian govts do it or whoever, is that it's a lot of pomp and show and making the right noises about an important issue, that doesn't actually do anything meaningful for the benefit of consumers because actually doing so would be antithetical to profit-making. Instead, all we get is another avenue of exploitation, except this one is legitimized and obfuscated.
and obviously it's a global, systemic problem
It doesn't even solve the issue they are trying to solve because all it's going to do is screw over people who are already setting up barriers of entry and other methods to prevent abuse or other possible dangerous situations for the ones these changes are supposedly protecting (because the people who are going to try and do horrific things are just going to do them anyway, it's incredibly easy to access and find these things and there's no protections or anything like that to them)
yeah that's what I mean, it's not meant to actually solve anything because that's too much work and a loss in profit
like, think about it - logically, if you run a company like Discord and are serious about preventing abuse, what would you do? Have an actual, sizeable moderation team to analyze user reports, flag the p3d0/illegal ones, and either IP ban and/or notify local law enforcement.
but that takes money and resources and implicitly assumes responsibility for on-platform behavior, all 3 being things that tech firms are LOATHE to do
and govts don't have the balls to enforce this because ha ha funding money
the fact that Discord have no intention of actually protecting children is blatantly obvious from one thing: the focus is entirely on user verification. There is absolutely zero chatter on dealing with abusers who bypass this or even people who ARE identified as adults but indulge in abusive or threatening behavior.
this whole thing is a smokescreen to 1. get access to stratified user data which is MUCH more valuable than anonymized, and 2. wash their hands off of any legal liability whatsoever
Better than I could put it, yeah. Partially because I'm terrible at dodging the filter.
what if i dont have webcam ?
Discord is going to assume you are a teenager. So any content on Discord that requires being older than a teenager is locked out for you.
or migrate to another software like i migrated to discord π€·ββοΈ
my bigger worry is this trend is gonna become the norm
for all firms
especially if govt keeps siding with them / initiating it themselves as they have so far
Well Cyberpunk
I have a webcam but it has been pointing at the ceiling for last
5 years? apart from during interviews (where I had discord closed)
That's generally how it starts yeah. Something that's ubiquitous and difficult to motivate people to boycott slowly erodes at your expectations and it just becomes normalized across the board. Much like the current state of video game monetization models IMO.
My webcam is built into my laptop π
^ basically thats why happened from own software to digital licenses
Rip
They can see your face whenever
Is Discord irreplaceable? No, but it's definitely going to be tough trying to convince (particularly younger generations) to care in numbers that actually matter.
yes
good parallel
another is subscription services for every single thing
Not really. You have almost always just owned the license not the software.
depends, for several things you actually owned the product
internet already became searched and visible place.. not as it was firstly publiced to be anonymous freedom..
And since younger generation overrun it they wanna check and then spy on common folks too
legally
e.g. if you bought an old Nintendo console and its cartridges, that wasn't a license. You physically owned the products. It couldn't be taken off at the whim of Nintendo.
Remember when Netflix had the world convinced that a subscription model was good? Until other companies decided Netflix had a good thing and they all decided to stop licensing their content to Netflix and just build out their own streaming platforms lmao
Can you give me some examples, cuz even discs for software in the really early 2000s were stated as legally just the license not the software
Yes it could, they in fact had the ability to lock down original Nintendo DSes remotely
I dunno which variant you're talking about but the absolute original ones they could not. Same with PS, Dreamcast, Xbox
same with ownership of the disc-based games, at the time
hence that famous PS advert about how to share games
I'm fairly sure younger generations (namely Gen Z and Gen Alpha) simply do not care about online privacy in the same way prior generations do.
How can you care about what has been normal your whole life?
Ok. I don't really want to argue about it but I read the legal stuff on this growing up.
iirc the legalese around licensing w.r.t. CDs was with softwares like Photoshop or OSes like Windows
where you also needed to go online once to register the product
but like, the old old games that needed no internet at all, those were very much indistinguishable from physical products
Video game licensing started happening in the early 2000s? No?
Anything prior to that, you owned it.
yeah like one of my first CD-based video games was Icewind Dale 2
no connection required, no nothing. I installed it on 3 different computers, gave it two friends to install and play. No issues, no nada.
Yeah product activation was tied to the CD key, there were no online checks, you just had to have a valid CD key.
that was local activation only, correct
like just to make the CD read on your machine
nearly any game made prior to 1999 required you to reference the manual, as an anti-piracy measure
Ah, the good old days of CD key generators lmao
"please enter the third word on page 24 to continue" vibes
lmao I remember that with some rando game someone gifted me
they should bring that shit back lol
"In order to verify your legal ownership, please use your King's Quest IV manual to answer the following question: On page 4, what is the seventh word in the first paragraph?"
Granted, buying a game back then still never granted you rights to the intellectual property itself.
Some people might assume it did.
The only rights you had with regards to IP was the ability to use the software.
You still didn't have distribution rights.
IP ownership is different from product ownership and has been so since the USPTO set up their shit
I'm sure EU would do something about that tbh
not the states though
I also remember having a giant flipcase of movie and music CDs
Yeah, so owning the physical media didn't mean you were allowed to make copies and give them away or sell them
You could make copies, just not give them away or sell them
man those were good times, when your worry was more about "god I hope someone doesn't scratch my disc" rather than "god I hope Netflix doesn't wake up one and decide to obliterate my favorite shows because some nerd told them to replace it with some garbage"
Blowing on discs, washing discs over water, cleaning sprays... all kinds of stuff we did back then lol
kids that got sticky candy on them
Should be fine as long as it's completely dry when in use
But also some places might have some seriously hard water with lots of mineralization which maybe could make it worse too
As an American, my personal data has been breached, sold and changed hands so many times from the last couple decades of exposures that I'm starting to become desensitized to moral appeals to privacy.
discs are actually more vulnerable to scratches on the top side (where the label is) than the bottom, somewhat counterintuitively
what
the physical structure is: label -> aluminum -> polycarbonate
it is very easy to scratch through the label and damage the aluminum, it requires significantly more effort to cause the same level of damage from the other side
most scratches on the bottom are superficial, as CDs use CIRC to rebuild missing bits around minor scuffs (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-interleaved_ReedβSolomon_coding)
not sure what DVDs use but it's probably similar
https://wiki.lyrion.org/uploads/4/47/Cd_structure.jpg for reference, to see just how much thicker the bottom layer is
data isn't actually stored in the aluminum, but it's required for the laser to read data off the disc

"Adobe, redact all these files please" ass government lol
Istg
They should give Bjorn a cameo in DoW4 lol
that would be hilarious
First time to sleep 7h once time! Cool.
13 days left before the free day. Less than 2 weeks! Cool.
Just get up.
I guess Bazaar act the key. Go on playing that after come back from the regular work
End of April, 0.5 of poe 2 will come. Nice
I need to think which build can I play at beginning of April
Hope someone cook a field spears ritualist guide after many teasers 
π Quite surprised to see my elder brothers to play nioh 3
I'm confused when Huawei release a laptop with rtx 5060
They're communicating how to play soul-like games and how to play this game
anyone want to play idle game with me ?
lol the same destination, ticket of high-speed rail is Β₯872, it spend 9h50mins to arrive, go from 07:18;
ticket of plane is Β₯535, it spend 2h30mins to arrive, go from 15:05 (I can select flight at afternoon).

Watched a 125mins movie about how a poor racer win a top-tier rally race by their hard work and I'm quite immersed and focused so I'm hungry, it's why I attracted by smell of skewers made by octopus legs :)
The story is ended by their self-made race car is trashed completely after they push over the finish line. The car was experienced a lot and it's the highlight period of this movie... No spoilers here fortunately :)
https://youtu.be/R2TrSn8yKJA?si=C7batfEfqFCMfE_v
Oh, this trailer can tell something about how amazing the process of race is (notice the lost hood)
Nioh isn't exactly souls like
Nioh is like, the most souls-like game I can think of that isn't FromSoft
Nah that'd be Lies of P
uh no
I view that as more Sekiro like tbqh
realistically itβs probably thymesia
but nobody but deranged insane asylum patients like me know the depths of all the random souls-likes
like who tf knows what thymesia is except the most souls fan souls fans
The reason why I said nioh isn't exactly souls like is because of the skill tree, stances and gearing
But yeah, it does have souls like stuff
The only part of that not in a FromSoft souls game is a skill tree
yeah
And that's not what makes a souls like. A souls like is defined by the gameplay style.
βgearingβ it has random stats and stuff but also you either grind 200 hours and become op because of it or you just use whatever you get and itβs fine anyway
the gearing in nioh is widely agreed upon to be god awful
yep
monster hunter is also a souls-like
Sekiro is from Fromsoft and a soulslike with skill tree
I was really excited for the next fromsoft game only to learn its another platform exclusive game, this time for nintendo
Never played sekiro
Me neither
All I know is that their shadow died twice
Quite the feat
modern nioh is more alike to sekiro than souls
same with lies of p
while nioh 1 is pretty quintessentially not a good game, they better figured out what they wanted to do in nioh 2 and went in on counter mechanics similar to sekiro
cleanse pools, counter attacks in specific ways, damage resistances, weakspots etc
rather than the straight forward combat of demon souls to dark souls 3
itβs from softβs best game
far better than any of their other modern games
iβd say the only competitor is ac6
sekiro is also my favorite from soft game aside from maybe us release kingβs field 4
ac6?
armored core 6
Thank god cuz I was thinking how are they comparing this to assassin's creed π€£
nono lol
sekiro has the best story in any from soft game by a massive margin
its art design is beautiful, competed only by bloodborne
it uses large amounts of relevant folklore and spiritual belief to japan in lots of very interesting ways
it has by far the best combat
Assassin's Creed hasn't had a numbered entry since Black Flag, I think by technicality we're on like, game 9 or 10 for "main series" entries now?
itβs compact and doesnβt draw itself out unnecessarily
my only complaint is that weβll never get a sekiro 2 despite how many plot threads were left open for one lol
tbh i like modern assassinβs creed. the problem is also that itβs not rly assassinβs creed lol
There is no Sekiro 2, no Bloodborne 2, no modern King's Field, no Demon's Souls 2, no Dark Souls 4, and you'll like it.
Yeah I mean, same. They're fun, at worst they're just okay games, they're just not really the series they say they are. Haven't been since Black Flag or arguably Origins.
if they ever rebooted kingβs field like they did armored core iβd probably genuinely cry
the only other game iβve done that with is the okami 2 announcement, i think? iirc i broke down into tears when we were watching the thing that got announced at
yeah
IIRC they estimated that to be another 2 or 3 years out at least, but still. It's happening.
yeah
rediscovering kingβs field and kingβs field likes as an adult after playing them as a child but somewhat forgetting about them was genuinely moving for me lol
(i say king fieldβs likes because thereβs not rly a good name for the genre)
I propose the name "circle strafers" 
i propose βwalk backwards a bit so they missβ too
truly revolutionary gameplay
or lunacid where the game starts as a βwalk backwards a bitβ and ends as βultrakillβ
Nah can't agree with that. Lunacid is good.
lol
that game is great
also the dev is clinically insane because they made a game in the original kingβs field level creator???
in 2025?
like what. who does that
lunacid was also made by the same person who made spookyβs jumpscare mansion
π I wish I can get heart attack per time I heard someone to play fireworks.
Might I suggest earplugs or something similar?
Asking for a hart attack is new lmao ,u don't want those believe me
It's a big change that the time I wear my earphone from 0h to 4-5h per day indeed
Or deafness.
Nnno that's pretty bad too. I spent a whopping two months deaf in one ear and it was miserable.
I selected earphone instead of earplug because I find some relaxing music surround me is much better than just reduce the noise a bit
hah...Almost forget I have a earplug package which it saved in the station 4 days...
The thing with earplugs they don't help that much I still hear from the vibration
I know because I use heavy duty ones at work when I can't cope with machinery anymore and I can mostly hear everything
headphones like your profile is the best but find one which don't pressure my ears with my glasses is... π€
I just isolateed my room with foam for fireworks ,we get them very often here to
I was specifically looking for headset that doesn't damage my ear cup
Took me ages to find it
I was looking for something that is made for aviation like helicopters but Seinhaiser does big cup phones that covers most ear
I m very happy with them I just need to find foam replacement now
Bull running every summer for a week underneath my apartment so fireworks go of all day long ...
That's how they mark start and finish of every run
oof, how much they were ? :d
Sennheiser is quite a brand
Although they do have "cheap" headphones
140 ISH euros I think it's been like 3 years
Not bad, I'm yet to try them
that's really affordable
especially considering how stupidly expensive headphones they do produce as well
if you think how long these last its kind of cheap even if you go higher, my philips fidelio x2 are now about 10y old and work just fine still
New Headset whodis? What is everyone's favorite headset to use when gaming?
Not me looking for reccomendations
The biggest problem is how much budget you have xd
Well
I have been using this logitech g35 since I got it
... in like 2009
That's absolutely wild. I have a keyboard that old but headset... whew
How old
WHAT
Logis keyboards are tank

