#Oppenheimer
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
I've been avoiding the MI thread even though I don't know how you spoil a MI movie, but this one I'm excited to read reactions to.
I really wanted a dual thread for this and Barbie. Barbie is fine to have it’s own thread also though 
Anyone gonna take any guesses as to what happens at the climax
Shh. This is a spoiler channel but lets save that spoiler for after the film releases.
Christopher Nolan’s ‘OPPENHEIMER’ debuts with 96% on Rotten Tomatoes from 49 reviews.
Read our review: https://t.co/KjXkrTYxL2 https://t.co/pE1MNR680j
from the WaPo review:
But the dialogue in “Oppenheimer” is scrupulously comprehensible — a victory for anyone who has found Nolan’s sound mixes to be unintelligible in the past.
legitimately the thing i was most worried about
I just saw it and idk if I was too close to the wrong speaker but the sound mixing had issues every so often imo
I felt like the music drowned out important dialogue too much. Or at least distracted me from really catching every word of it?
I don’t know, I had some audio issues as well
Felt like it was unnecessary loud at some parts
Not talking about explosions either
My roommate and I had to check some of historical details afterwards because of the dialogue issues
Yee. At one point I wished there was close captioning
Just like my anime 
I can say any of the music that did happen was so unremarkable that I don’t remember a single piece
Unlike the song Angel P2 from Fast X

I kinda loved that lmao
Alden my goat
I didn’t have sound mix issues where I saw it
Thought it was a very bold decision to write in the script “[MAKE SURE YOU GET A SHOT OF HER BOOBS HERE]” in between him saying “Now I am become death.” and “The destroyer of worlds.”
Is the post-bomb part of the movie actually black and white or is that only the trailers?
I haven’t seen it yet so idk how correct this is but https://fxtwitter.com/factsonfilm/status/1682466028461383681?s=46&t=YVkoJNj-2foKiY6d1OF9TA
Christopher Nolan says the color scenes in #Oppenheimer are ‘subjective’ and the black-and-white scenes are ‘objective’ https://t.co/E3vkexI9Ah
I’d say it isn’t as clear cut as that. Some of the black and white scenes are subjective.
But definitely can say all the color scenes are subjective and not objective
Oppenheimer was a fine movie but its politics were a bit iffy. wouldve been way better if at the end the Oppenheimer turned to the camera & said "im a revisionist japanese imperialist now" & then specified which asian territories rightfully belong to the emperor
Likes
6849
Retweets
577
It’s fun to read the discourse because people think depiction = endorsement
And also like…the lack of Japanese perspective was literally the point
We saw Oppenheimer in IMAX tonight but the only seats left were the very front row. One of the most upsetting viewing angles of my life https://t.co/dcvMBeEdO2
Angelic needs a new pfp 
there was a cheer at that 😭

Great job making magic @gaunt robin!
Mickey is promoting you to level 8 ! 
This movie was definitely a movie
The ‘OPPENHEIMER’ atomic bomb explosion was created by combining a bunch of science experiments.
“We built aquariums with power in it. We dropped silver particles in it. We had molded metallic balloons which were lit up from the inside.”
(Source: https://t.co/Ke8bCojQNi)
Likes
468
This is what I’m afraid of when I see it
I’m not lol
But I’m pretty close still
LEGO Barbenheimer by ‘Across the Spider-Verse’ animator @FG_Artist https://t.co/hiVpbSJF1l
So even tho I slept, the parts I saw were incredible
Dolby Atmos was very worth for the very loud scenes like the bomb and the crowd stomping
Why did you sleep through, were you drowsy?
I got plenty of rest for my showtime today! I hope my friends are ready too.
To those who saw this in IMAX 70mm, how was the view?
Oh, I’d be knocked out before trailers even starts lol. I have an early bed time and I’m sensitive to drinks.
I’ll watch it again on streaming because I really was liking it
How did you see it, IMAX 70mm?
This movie was substantially better than I expected it to be
I did see it in 70mm, projector go brrrrr
I do think the movie didn’t go far enough to show the suffering and horror of the bomb
That would be a criticism I have of it
i have not seen it yet so only dipping in here briefly
but damn
universal makes a movie where nolan very creatively has a practical effect of an atomic bomb
imagine if Universal Studios had some sort of Special Effects Stage where they could talk about that
Felt cowardly to have a scene of people seeing photos of Hiroshima, and have the camera turned away from the screen
Deliberate choice
Your mind fills in the blanks
Also it’s from his POV
My beef with this is your mind can’t possibly fathom how bad it is
I recognize it’s a choice, but I think it’s a bad one
Agreed POV wise it shouldn’t have cut to Hiroshima
But via Oppenheimer’s POV we see plenty of the bomb in the trinity test, but very minimal of the suffering he would later see from Hiroshima
We see glimpses, but I just don’t think Nolan showed enough
I don’t think the movie in general was as anti-bomb as Oppenheimer himself
Movie was still very good, I think it’s an easy best picture nom
This is for sure I think the biggest debate thats going to happen with this film, or at least should be. I haven’t seen yet but had this spoiled for me (I wanted it to be) and I am sure I’ll have thoughts about it.
i wanted to QT the lady that said women dont speak until 20 minutes into Oppenheimer so i could point out that, as a woman, i was speaking 5 minutes in because i wanted to know if that was kenneth branagh
Likes
4138
Retweets
182
The trinity explosion was visually okay, though the aftershock blew my ears!
I did my duty.
I drove to the IMAX 70mm theater right on opening hours on the day Oppenheimer went on sale to avoid paying convenience fees.
I got $25 gift cards for $20 right before on the same day I got those tickets.
I reserved the best spots for me and my friends. Near the back, centered columns.
We saw Oppenheimer last weekend and there were no issues!
They loved it! Way more than Tenet, and it was their first real IMAX experience.
I love getting the best possible experience, it fuels my competitive nature.
I wish I went on opening night so I could’ve gotten the film strips, but the projector broke down that night.
We are giving out a new #Oppenheimer #IMAX 70mm filmstrip this Friday.
Giveaway will start with the 10 am #IMAX show and continue until we run out of filmstrips. Filmstrips only available while supplies last.
Click to reserve your seats - https://t.co/GzGDuAAotW
I liked Oppenheimer a lot but I felt like this scene was a bit out of place and kind of ruined the immersion. https://t.co/gk7SO4aRI8
Apparently now a censored version of the movie is now in several countries.
Basically just covered up Florence pugh in a cgi edited black dress for a scene
Happy Barbenheimer everyone! Watch as these two elderly losers stall for half the video before finally discussing what some are calling the best movie of the year: Oppenheimer! In addition to that, Mike and Jay discuss the ongoing writer and actor strikes as well as it's consequences on movies, theaters, streamers, audiences, and most importantl...
Now I can have an opinion about the movie without watching it 
This is how it feels to wake up to an alarm https://t.co/Pb2aSkw1lZ
Yeah wasn't sure if they would reveal she was murdered, cause it shows a hand
But I checked the Wikipedia and apparently it's unclear if she committed suicide or was killed
Oppenheimer good
Thats my review
But the bathroom line after was not good so 0/10
In all seriousness, the Einstein “jumpscare” when hes behind the car was so damn funny
JFK being set up like Joker in Batman Begins too
I appreciate the final line not being I am become death
Chad Nolan put it in the sex scene instead.
(And like 4 other places)
Emily Blunt is 1000% getting a supporting actress nom right?
honestly like the entire cast could get supporting actress/actor
I think RDJ will probably get supporting actor nom
RDJ getting the win no question
I havent seen Barbie yet though so maybe its Goslings
ngl (im a little biased to him) but Gosling is phenomenal in Barbie
Gosling nails every line delivery with the perfect amount of camp/over the top
Robbie also great too ||she gets some more serious moments||
Cillian Murphy gets a best actor nom off this for sure
RDJ on supporting, maybe Emily Blunt on supporting (her or Florence Pugh maybe)
Cillians gonna win the award there is not one single doubt in mind
Especially if a lot of movies are gonna get delayed because the strike
I think Killers of the Flower Moon will give some competition in the acting categories
i doubt it will because its an Apple TV release so it wouldnt have made a lot of money anyways
damn nvm its got a $200mil budget they probably want some of that back lol
I feel seen
I figured itd get a full theatrical release
Didnt the Oscar’s change the rules for streaming
His lawyer looking like Chris D’elia after learning you can screenshot snapchats
This isnt a complaint at all but for all the people saying, WOAH THIS MOVIES FULL OF NUDITY, i gotta say i was surprised it was like a minute of boobs and half a butt
Not on my watch
Yeah reading some poorly written reviews online and like tiktoks warning of it, kinda weird how prudish people are with nudity in movies
it will get nominated and most likely lose
Beau is Afraid, Asteroid City? (I'm not familiar with any smaller releases)
Past Lives? Idk what it's about but that's been well received I think
Beau is afraid no lmao
The only things I can think of so far for possible noms are Creed 3 and Air
They seem like the type
@worldly dagger this u?
My favorite part of the movie is that whenever it was quiet for even a second i could hear the projector losing its mind
WHIRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
I’m very glad I woke up before the loud moments
Because it made my sleeping much less obvious
Oppenheimer’s grandson says he really enjoyed ‘OPPENHEIMER’ but he had an issue with the poison apple.
“There's no record of him trying to kill somebody. That's a really serious accusation and it's historical revision.”
(Source: https://t.co/NVHC2c7HYv)
Likes
11839
Retweets
405
LOL
LMAO even
isnt it also true tho? just played out differently and without Bohr?
fuck i gotta read the whole script
Is it common to have erm, "stage directions" in the first person like that?
Ah. Guess I'm not familiar with them. Is it like a novelization of the script rather than the film itself?
nah he wrote the screenplay in first person as an excercise, at least the bits from oppenheimer's pov
That's interesting
This movie reminded me that I’m 3 degrees away from Einstein and probably also Oppenheimer too thanks to a family friend that worked for a big pioneering geologist that was at CalTech in those days
This movie was so fucking loud.
Muppets Oppenheimer
Oppenheimer: Gonzo
Groves: Sam Eagle
Senate aid to Strauss: Kermit
Jean Tatlock: Miss Piggy
Kitty: Camilla the Chicken
Teller: Fozzie
Hill: Pepé the King Prawn
Ein & Stein: Statler & Waldorf
Strauss: Steve Martin
Isidor: Rizzo
Neils Bohr: Bunsen Honeydew
Likes
1637
Retweets
159
As soon as I scrolled far enough to see Gonzo's hat I lost it
IMAX is throwing a filmstrip in with any purchase
Tax is different obviously but with shipping the cheapest thing i could get was 19 dollars and its just postcards. Theyre different than the ones they gave out
And theres new showtimes being added
Wait where?
So really hope I get filmstrip at AMC on Sunday
it's imax screenings on the first three fridays
so last week, today, and next week.
Imax store
Online
Idk whats still available but i believe the postcards are gone
Apparently these are different than the ones in theaters and arent actual 70mm film(i dont think the theater ones were either)
Probably not.
But bet we’ll get actual cells with Blu-ray
Like interstellar and maybe tenet
Does it count if I bought the $12 Post cards?
Lol the postcards sold out fast so i sure hope
D’oh, I should’ve bought more! They would’ve been great gifts.
They said ANY purchase gets it so we should be good
I heard the beanie is sold out too but it may be back
Aiite, maybe I'm just not a fan of Nolan when they're based on true events
also I felt like the explosion could've been more.....epic?
Wait Jiga you saw it in 70mm and it wasn’t epic enough for you, what did you want the screen to actually blow wind at you
i was waiting for that jaw dropping epic visual moment I got from say like Interstellar
(Btw they have something like this at atomic testing museum near Vegas)
what I got was just a giant fireball on the screen
…. What were you expecting?
Like seriously what do you think an atomic blast looks like
like i've seen better atomic blast footage on youtube
I didn't get a sense of the scale
at 70mm, i expected my jaw to drop
also, i dont think there was a moment in the movie where there wasn't constant dialogue
there were several parts of the movie where my singe celled brain was like, who did what? Teller did whom?
Strauss set up what?
I will say though the soundtrack during intense dialogue scenes were my jam
also my wife went to the bathroom at the worst time to go LOL
I feel like from what I’ve heard, theres like no good time to go
I’m planning on going right before and not getting soda or anything
i went when they were at home doing something. I didn't really care about his personal life or flings
Oh! So tiktok let me know about this app that's been around for years called runpee. It constantly gets updated with new films and all you have to do is start the timer right when it says, and it will give you a buzz about 30 seconds before the best times to go pee.
I think this is legitimately your worst take in this server
I tested just to see and it gave me 6 points throughout the movie and with my watch, a notification showed up basically saying "Look for this line:" and it would give a line of dialogue to listen for.
The pure silence, the bright white, the practical explosion, and then the sound hitting you when it finally reaches them
the countdown was amazing
Very suspensful as it should be
as for the practical explosion, i was expecting something like this timestamp
Beginning in 1945, and until atmospheric nuclear testing was banned, the United States conducted 210 above-ground nuclear tests, documented on film. Now, footage that has survived, now being preserved by the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, is being analyzed for their scientific data, changing what we previously knew about the destructive...
but in 70mm glory
or work with me visually on stuff like this
iono
2 hours and 58 mins of constant dialogue
2 mins of an actual explosion
it's almost like the movie was about the man and not the bomb
It’s called Oppenheimer not Atomic Bomb
the best part of the movie was him talking to einstein at the end
i wanted more moments like that
I slept through most of the movie and I’m irrationally angry at Jiga
not this back and forth investigation shit
I believe it did
I do understand your issue Jiga because they went the opposite direction in showing the scale. They seemed to take the approach of "Fill the screen to show it's size" instead of "show from afar with landmarks for reference to show scale"
yes thank you
My best friend also complained that the onscreen explosion wasn’t impressive to him
also, Jiga
The aftershock after the silence made up for it
It's a small moment of a bigger film so I don't really have an issue with that myself. I also understand it was partially because they did practical to represent the explosion
the visuals you're thinking of and expected to see are not what the subject was. the classic "nuclear explosion" you're probably picturing (like this) is later, the exact thing that Oppenheimer was opposed to after the war
that's Castle Bravo, which was a fusion bomb, rather than Trinity's fission
you still get a mushroom like effect though
like if they zoomed out to this
instead of zooming up into it iono
but like it was mentioned. more about the man than the bomb itself
got tired of the Commie shit
tbf, its my fault for not knowing about oppenheimer beyond being the bomb creator
I love the fact that this had a non zero chance at ending the world and they used it 3 times 😄
My postcards shipped!
lol i can't tell if i'm being memed or not
it wasn't a real bomb that they filmed right
#oppenheimer #christophernolan #nuclearexplosion
Christopher Nolan in Oppenheimer
#cillianmurphy #robertdowneyjr #emmathompson
All material belongs to Universal Pictures
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scho...
US government is devoted to cinema
It's also like, hundreds of times stronger than Trinity.
the more i watch real footage of the trinity test, the more I'm giving nolan a pass
but still
couldve been more impressive, especially with all that buildup
Literally an order of magnitude higher. Trinity was 25 kilotons, Bravo was 15 megatonnes
And Bravo was also 3x what they wanted out of the explosion. It was quite a photogenic explosion, but we only have like three pictures of it because all the equipment vaporized
it's crazy that these became memes bc having seen the movie and knowing the context, these are some of the most disturbing images in any recent movie https://t.co/5kGIxdlBjy
Beedonts review: if Spielberg made this movie it’d be better. It’s too far up it’s own ass
That can be said for like 90% of Nolan films to far up its own ass
Fun related fact Spielberg was tied to a film Nolan would eventually direct once, Interstellar.
I mean honestly I found the movie very self masturbatory from Nolan. A lot of the narrative is “it’s real tough to be a genius isn’t it”
I think it’s a beautifully crafted film that doesn’t work for me. And I think it never should have been made
The last part of that is interesting
During the second act I started wondering what time it was so I wasn’t feeling it
And tbh Nolan sucks shit at women!!!!!!!!
I’m excited to see it tomorrow still and see how I feel about it.
Yeah I think it’s worth seeing
It’s well made but I feel like no one ever asked the question of should we make this movie. It’s biggest flaw tho is definitely length and there are things that could absolutely be cut
I think it’s absolutely wild for them to have multiple scenes of Oppenheimer talking about how much he loves New Mexico and then completely ignore the fall out after Trinity
It’s actually gross to me
Gary Oldman as Truman is lol
The way I read it is that Oppenheimer just doesn’t give a fuck
Like the parts in colour are intended to be from his perspective, and the real weight of what he did doesn’t actually hit until his security clearance is about to be revoked
I do think they probably could’ve at least mentioned it in some other way though
Is it responsible to make a movie about not giving a fuck about atrocities? Plus the third act is about his moral qualms so is that even true. And his security clearance getting pulled is like a baby being punished.
Personally I don’t find anguished looks of him clutching his head enough to like excuse him. And even if the movie is meant to hold him accountable that’s muddled by the entire Strauss subplot
Which pretty much paints him as a victim lol
I thought the idea was that he secretly wanted to be punished for what he did and losing the clearance was a way of doing that
Didnt Emily Blunt flat out say that?
The thing that the movie didn't really make clear
is that by the time of the hearing, in the early 50s, anything related to nuclear energy was classified
losing his security clearance meant he wasn't able to basically exist as the same person
no job, no friends who could or would be willing to talk to him
I read the Strauss subplot as just showing the irony of the whole situation. The one person to bring actual consequences to Oppenheimer doesn’t do it because of the bomb, but because he embarrassed him one time
I definitely don’t think the movie is perfect by any means tho
The Florence Pugh subplot in particular is just bizarre
I mean they completely gloss over him being a womanizer and basically glorify it
And yes I do think it’s intended to show the irony but just because that’s the intention doesn’t mean it’s actually effective, imo.
that’s fair
Like I think Nolan thought the Kyoto crossed off the list hit REALLY hard as a way to paint the bureaucrats
But I don’t think it’s the win he thinks it is
the kyoto thing was just a real thing that happened too
Yeah I know it’s real but honestly like there needed to be more moments like that
I think the Truman scene was the best at being like “oh this dude is an actual monster”
imo
I do think they also could’ve cut some of the more marvel-esque moments
Like when he suits up in the Oppenheimer outfit
or the jfk namedrop
Yes those are cringe moments
The Truman scene just felt like a caricature like it was too over the top compared to the rest of the movie which is. Very. Serious.
Nolan thinks he’s the Oppenheimer of film freal freal
When his scenes about actual tender moments make me think he’s a lizard in human skin
yeah the literal suit up part was dumb lmao
and as far as "teasing historical figures like marvel cameos" moments go, the JFK one was better than what The King's Man did
I gotta give The King’s Man points for commitment
The JFK name drop is a tie in to Oliver Stone’s film
Its actually a reference to a character in call of duty zombies
Are you Shit posting? Because this movie has a lot in common with that one lol
I am
Lmao I figured
Gentlemen, zombies.
Pray to be…strongah men
I have not seen Oliver Stone’s President conspiracy universe
I can't tell if the JFK name drop is dumb, or MCU brainrot makes me think any name drop is like some marvel thing
Amazing movie
Makes me want to rewatch Chernobyl, which moved me in similar ways
And Twin Peaks: The Return, Part 8
I don’t think Nolan sees himself as Oppenheimer when the movie portrays him as completely spineless
Even from the beginning
I don’t think he’s spineless
I completely missed this! Knew he looked familiar but couldn’t figure it out
Haha id recognize that scally wag anywher e
I got the film strip from buying IMAX post card! But I accidentally cut into while opening the package…
The way they both unexpectedly returned on Christmas
“My little women.” “My little scientists.” https://t.co/iuAZKRto7K
Alright so general thoughts. This film is very well made and crafted. Superbly acted, surprisingly well paced for a 3 hour film, and in IMAX the sound and picture are just unreal in some parts. That being said, I think the story structure leaves a lot to be desired and leads to first and third acts feeling unbalanced, especially since I predicted that RDJ’s character was the one who set up Oppenheimer to get security clearance pulled very early on. The balance of the two stories didn’t work very well overall and the apex of the film should have been the trinity test. Additionally, while you don’t need to show the dropping of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, they had ample opportunity to show the aftermath from Oppenheimers perspective (they even have a scene where he is looking at photos we don’t see). He’s imaginary scene doesn’t go far enough to showing the impact to humanity of dropping the bomb, and it could have. Those small opportunities that were missed leave a bit of a sour taste in my mouth on how it portrays the bomb and by extension Oppenheimer himself.
I’m struggling to determine if I agree with you here or not, I think not because I think its still an interesting piece of art overall that isn’t directly (keyword) harmful. Like Joker, I don’t think Joker should have been made because it is directly harmful in glorifying that incel mindset imo.
I thought they should have showed the photos tbh
I disagree
I like the leaving the horrors to the minds interpretation approach works better because otherwise it would have felt exploitative
I don’t know if it’s harmful like Joker, but ultimately it comes across as disrespectful which is why I feel like it didn’t need to be told. Like you said about how it portrays the bomb and Oppenheimer.
Not to mention I think it works better in showing the government just shrugging off such a massive loss of life as nothing, and if anything necessary. That’s more chilling for me
And tbh I don’t think anyone is getting the horror of the mind thing as it’s more focused on sad boy Oppy.
Well then again we disagree on how good Oppy leaves the movie looking
Dw I am, Cz
I found it to be pretty damning of him and you found it to be a story of a misunderstood tragic genius
Yeah I can understand that point of view.
I think that’s good though. This is a movie that lets you actively engage with the material
I think it honestly stays fairly neutral on him ultimately.
But the fact that we are discussing it shows its good art imo.
I mean I think it’s damning of him??
I can think Oppenheimer sucks and hold a different opinion of what I think the narrative of the movie is.
I’m saying I don’t think Nolan thinks he’s a bad dude.
I think Nolan is leaving it for us decide if he’s good or bad.
I think Cz you were looking for it to straight up condemn Oppenheimer more and while I can understand that, I don’t think that was Nolan’s intention.
I think whats missing is the “opposite view” or “non objective” view scenes (B&W) during Trinity
And that’s one thing I like about it, it’s condemning but it’s not in your face about it
I mean think the entirety of the program and the bombings should be condemned, yes. But they’re still glorifying Oppenheimer in a way that doesn’t sit right to me.
Like the opposite views are basically oppy looking sad / conflicted.
Thats totally fair and valid criticism Cz
And the handling of the women in the movie is downright offensive. They’re props to Oppy.
They practically glorify his womanizing
Oh yeah well thats Nolan and his awful work with women characters for you
Honestly, what is the best female character in a Nolan film?
Fucking none
I can’t think of any really outstanding ones. Interstellar comes the closest to having women that feel like people I think.
I just don’t think Matt Damon running down a list of Oppy’s bad character traits is enough to condemn the man. It’s basically the same type of narrative stroke they do for like, Tony Stark lol
Oh yeah thats the other thing, RDJ is fine in the film, but Damon is imo the better supporting performance
And yeah probably Interstellar - I think it’s the most human of all of his films probably. Maybe the prestige?
Murphy is likely getting a nomination though 100%
I feel like Matt Damon is kinda playing the character he always plays tho ngl. Which isn’t like a negative tho just kinda is what it is
To this point though, the color scenes are supposed to be Oppy’s view point, so the fact that you are thinking of them as props for him is basically the movie saying thats how he sees them at well, which is pretty damning for me at least.
I don’t think the average viewer will realize that.
Also the apple thing is crazy how it just gets glossed over. Normal people aren’t out here doing that shit and then the convo he has about it with Pugh is cringe.
Oh agreed, the movie doesn’t do enough to show us the difference between the Fission and Fusion story lines at all
That scene where he grabs it out of Bohr’s hand was laughable
Yes
Idk how anyone can say it’s a perfect movie when naked Pugh grabs the book and makes him read. That scene is laughable and then the line….
OMG THAT TOO
SO bad
It’s the worst scene in the movie I think
I can agree with that.
Ultimately, Barbie won Barbienheimer for me
Like hands down
I’m gonna get made fun of for saying this
Well that’s obvious how I feel about that
And this is something I don’t think was artistic intent
But nolan writing women like shit worked from oppy’s pov

Lol I’m done here
I will say I’m not gonna be an army of 1 against Nolanheads but my criticism of this film isn’t unique
I know
Oh no its not and I don’t necessarily disagree with it
I think Dunkirk is better tbh
I agree with it more than I disagree with it
And I don’t want to seem like I’m saying a lot of your criticisms are invalid just because I disagree
I think so too tbh. I think this might be slightly better directed but Dunkirk is a tighter film.
It’s not my intent but I do fear it’s the vibe I’m giving off
Like I think Chris Nolan just wanted an excuse to see Florence Pugh naked
It’s kind of like three movies tho. You could have made an entire movie about the communism stuff probably
100%
There is 100% at least two movies here
I thought it was funny
I like Nolan’s fiction. I don’t like his non-fiction
And he doesn’t justify them being one film
Also the third act was confusing as fuck to me. First act as well
I will say Murphy does a really good job no question
The acting is superb top to bottom imo
Murphy is great, just wished he caught Oppys gaunt look a little bit more
Dude talked and looked like a corpse IRL
Florence Pugh’s character is written awfully but her acting is good
I didn’t give a shit bout Pughs character
Honestly, they could have cut everything with Pugh’s character out of the film. It was a waste
I think it’s just very disappointing to get such a well crafted movie that is still so… cis white male. It’s like… too traditional. Like there’s just no consideration for other elements and I find it to be an irresponsible decision given the subject matter.
But it was the 1940s
I’m not 100% sure what you mean there?
Okay and Mad Men and has more nuance
Madmen is fiction isn’t it
And was more reflective of social issues at the time
Uh do you think women didn’t exist at the time?
Or indigenous people
In a movie about developing the atomic bomb?
Indigenous people is a fair criticism
Like you’re basically proving my point which is showing history through that lense is tired
Because history was happening for everyone else at that time
Including his wife
I don’t want Christopher Nolan to make a movie showing the indigenous perspective
It’s not his story to tell
Im not saying it has to be one or the other
And it would have been doing too much to fit it in imo

Anyway I think what I like about interstellar is even though that movie isn’t wholly successful at what it’s trying to do, I think the ending is kind of subversive with its ultimate power of love stuff? Like who would expect that from a sci-fi alpha masculine Matthew Mccantspellhisname vehicle. It feels like Nolan stepping out of his comfort zone more.
Felt like he stepped out with Inception
I think you were hoping for a movie more about the Manhattan Project from an impartial lens, this is being shown from the lens of Oppy 100% and its ultimately about him. I think we agree on the fact that not showing more from the impartial POV like they did with the stuff with RDJ’s character weakens the film but even then I don’t think it would work to explore too much outside of Oppy’s role in things.
Well it is also kind of weird they only do it for parts of the movie
But beedont didnt realize the distinction between color and black and white until I told him
Because Interstellar was developed by his brother primarily, Chris came in to direct after Spielberg moved to working with Disney for a bit.
yeah well that explains a lot
Oh 100% agree, they needed more of the B&W stuff.
Christopher Nolan is a robot and you won’t convince me otherwise
This movie was about what I expected and I still maintain it shouldn’t have been made. Bagel mentioned Chernobyl
Imagine if that had just been made from the like, Russian propaganda POV
totally different show
Yep I get your position and its valid, I don’t agree but its valid.
I don’t think these two pieces of media have much in common.
Iono guys, that last scene in Oppenheimer was haunting as fuck
And the JFK line is in the top five cringes
I don’t think anyone’s celebrating about being able to destroy the world
I knew about it and cringed
Except when they realize the bomb goes off it’s an entire scene of people cheering and no actual concern.
Well yeah in context, a world war was still going on
there’s not a single person who has a face that’s like “what are we doing here”
Even the guy who said he wasn’t going to stay as Los Alamos is there along for the ride
Whether mislead or not
They did that whole Oppy imagining the crowd burning up thing, but didn’t go far enough with it
Like that should have been 100x more horrifying
The regret came after the bomb was used lol
I mean that’s not even true Jiga considering there are several scenes with the scientists doing the petitions etc
Like you’re not supposed to be siding with the fanatical cheering squad on the bench
They show scenes of the scientists doubting as Los Alamos but once it goes off it’s all peachy to them
Oh also @agile wasp completely disagree with you on Trinity test not being impressive in IMAX
I think it's interesting that this movie has elicited the same conversations about Oppenheimer that historians have been having for decades.
Eh. I’m more lenient after watching actual footage
It’s a good thing I have to go to work or I’ll be here all day
thats scene was stunning imo, like its kinda gross when you think about it though in the cheering about it after
But that’s exactly my point lolol
See you’re getting it
Dude the shockwave sound startled me in my seat

Like it shook me
They’re excited when they shouldn’t be, they haven’t realized what they’ve done
Litterally its so loud
You’re supposed to look at all these people like the fools they are
Yes because of the view point we are seeing things from.
It’s meant to make you feel gross even though the move doesn’t explicitly go oh you should be feeling gross here
I think we should have had a B&W scene right after this showing the people who weren’t celebrating
I half agree with this.
I refuse to call a Nolan movie subtle but the fact it wasn’t in your face about this is BAD and it instead just lets you feel gross
They could have used music queues more to get the gross feeling across
Idk I’m too used to blockbuster movies that just tell you the message
Yeah I feel like theres plenty of other stories that properly show the impact of the bombings on Japan and that Nolan really isnt the guy who should be telling their story
Japanese cinema exists
Not to mention that this is a movie explicitly from an ignorant white male perspective
I think y’all are seeing this as some sort of glorification or celebration of Oppy, but to me it felt more like regret
Everyone here should do a Gojira watch after this movie as a follow-up. I think Internet Archive has it.
I know all about Gojira and have watched more Godzilla films than I care to as I have two friends obsessed
I definitely dont think its a celebration, it feels more like Nolan did not want to take a side on if he is evil or not.
You can call it Godzilla, you don’t have to be pretentious and call it Gojira 
Especially since 1954 film you can distinguish and call American version Godzilla, King of Monsters!
One of my friends is a SUPER SUPER ultra mega Godzilla fan and he always calls the first one Gojira
The rest are just Godzilla
Yes and also Godzilla nerds are extreme
That’s what I don’t get, at what point of the movie does Nolan go, Oppy not bad or good
I still think thats kinda stupid ngl
The OG 54 film is only one I’ve watched outside newer American films so far and I do love it
I call the original Gojira specifically to differentiate it from the American edit of the film that removes all the bomb sumbolism
Hes got what probably equates to 100 grand worth of rare Godzilla merch. He got a lot of it from swap meets. Like some random dinosaur toy that sells for 1000 bucks he would get for like 15
Godzilla nerds are another level
Sure, but again that film has the separate subtitle for distinguishing purposes.
I suppose.
And yes the bomb stuff in that film is incredible
To me this is a documentary, just like dunkirk
But again this film isn’t about Hiroshima and Nagasaki
Its not so much that he did a specific thing, its more that I felt he just didnt take a side
Sounds like Nolan to me
You aren’t watching these movies correctly imo if you see them as “documentaries” because these are biased interpertations of real life events.
And Godzilla 54 is really about Castle Bravo and the fisherman that were poisoned by its fallout
Up to you to decide
At the end of the day, its still a movie that im sure has a lot of absolute fiction in it
I mean they aren’t documentaries 🤣🤣🤣
Hearing you talk about it makes me think of how graphic Schindler's List got depicting its subject matter, and I wonder whether that should have been more of a thing.
No not at all
Documentary is called a documentary for a reason but I’m not gonna fight over the literal dictionary
It’s a biopic which is SUBJECT TO BIAS
Ken Burns Oppenheimer when
Nolan could have made Oppenheimer gay and into orgies for all he wanted
Cuz it’s not a documentary
Maybe the sex would be better
I’m pretty sure Pugh had sex with Oppy on the office though
Someone on twitter was asking if she really had sex with him during the hearing 
Ive read so many bad interpretations of media on twitter im not even sure if he was joking
Every time I think I’ve seen the dumbest take on this movie on Twitter
It goes deeper
I saw a kid on tiktok call this movie military propaganda
Military propaganda is when the military is in the movie
Lmao, if theres one group this film 100% paints negatively its the military
It’s definitely not a pro government movie thats for sure
The Truman scene kinda made me laugh tbh, it was kinda bad.
Like him taking out his handkerchief was cringey
also a real thing that happened
Holy fuck really
truman's response to him idk about the hankerchief
Is that the scene where it's a POV shot at a table?
tbh I don't think the make up for truman was great
It was whatever
yeah but where else could you sneak gary oldman into this
It was just like "this is gary oldman in old people make up" it was too much gary oldman
Also now Gary Oldman needs to some how play Stalin
So that he can have acted as all three from Potsdam
Where was My Cocaine?
Not in it, surprisingly
Oh yeah didn’t mention score earlier, clear favorite right now imo for that award that was very good
Oh my god 😭😭😭
So my friend came up with a great interpretation of the B&W scenes, its not Strauss’s view point (or a completely third person one) but his lawyer (or aide I guess according to IMDb)
And I can get behind that
Interesting perspective but I think the black and white scenes early on kinda disprove that
Specifically the ones with Einstein, Strauss, and Oppenheimer
It’s him hearing Strauss’s telling of things
That’s true yeah
He is an ultimately unnamed character (seriously IMDb just says Senate Aide) and it’s the only way his character makes sense to be such a big part of the film.
I had someone suggest B&W is 100% happened and documented so there's almost nothing changed for those events
Where as in color there's some leeway and interpretation
They ran out of color when they filmed the B&W scenes
Good joke, but the truth is even funnier. Nolan had to specially have IMAX B&W film made, first time its ever been made
So I’ve heard this too, but there’s clearly some POV character in this and I think it makes most sense for it to be the aide at end of the day
yeah going by what Nolan said about objective vs subjective, the aide does make sense as hes trying to understand all the truth
Barbie caused the color shortage
Hold on let me get Nolan’s direct quote
“I knew that I had two timelines that we were running in the film,” Nolan said. “One is in color, and that’s Oppenheimer’s subjective experience. That’s the bulk of the film. Then the other is a black and white timeline. It’s a more objective view of his story from a different character’s point of view.”
He does say its an objective view, from a different character POV
Mind you, interperation of art belongs to the beholder, you can say that B&W is actually from an alien’s POV and if you can back it up I’ll accept it
The internet makes Oppenheimer sound really complicated to understand when it's literally a 3-hour movie of expository dialogue
"Hey this bomb idea seems more bad and deadly than planned"
"Might be...but let's continue"
How is that hard to understand lol
Short screenplay book for such a long film
I’ll have to see how many script pages it is when they do the FYC one
Also though, I would rather Barbie screenplay 
As an audiobook entirely read by Helen Mirren
Omg yes
Okay this might be worth getting to read a first person screenplay
That sounds intriguing
Chad president
It would be best to open from its wide side.
The only historical inaccuracy that I noticed in Oppenheimer is that when O learns the number of people who died in Hiroshima/Nagasaki, Nolan uses the more accurate count of deaths Japan did in the 70s rather than the American one in the 40s— a v responsible change to make
Likes
4360
Retweets
126
🙏
That’s valid change
I disagree
People are missing imo the biggest historical inaccuracy from my POV, Oppenheimer mentions concentration camps during a time period I dont think he’d have knowledge of them
To me that is huge, I get the point of underscoring the creators of the bomb as the same as those being persecuted by the Germans it was designed to be used against, but its weird.
Very valid change for the death count
Christopher Nolan says the #Oppenheimer gymnasium scene with the crowd sound roaring in and out is meant to parallel the delayed sound of the bomb blasting during the Trinity test
“The whole film is about consequences. The delayed onset of consequences that people often forget"
Likes
14974
Retweets
821
Because it would be viewed as objective truth by its audience, making it misinformation.
Did you not read the rest of the sentence?
So actually this is an interesting question because I think it depends on the story and when this is being told. Is this Oppenheimer recalling from memory or are we getting his POV in present tense. The screenplay will reveal this and if it’s past tense than using updated numbers it’s fine.
https://twitter.com/ATRightMovies/status/1687039022147751936 this is awesome LMAO
There’s a scene in Oppenheimer where a car drives away late at night and then Einstein walks out of the shadows like he’s Batman
I can’t stop thinking about it.
Likes
38873
Retweets
2040
did he write the script in first person?
Thats interesting
The color scenes are
that's because Nolan fancies himself a tortured genius like oppy
Did my video not post?
Interesting video about Oppenheimer not discussing truth of us not actually having to drop the bomb
There we go, good video about how America didn’t actually need to drop bomb and they knew this even during Oppenheimer’s time
Did Oppenheimer himself know this though?
The movie doesnt really shy away from Americans being bloodthirsty in the war. If Oppenheimer was aware that the bombs weren’t necessary and still made them, i think its important to bring up, but if this is info he didnt know, I dont see why it would be in the movie about his perspective
I’m not sure, maybe latter in life he did like during the time of his security clearance review. I’m unsure tbh
Theres a lot of weird things about the way this movie portrays things, and I’ve heard about 4 or 5 different interpretations on it. Which ultimately is good, I think if you have a story this complex seeing different views and opinions on it is great.
Didn't the movie bring this up?
Did it? I do not remember that
Maybe I'm mixing up the timeline but I feel like there was a scene where Oppie/someone made the case about this was to thrawt the Nazis, not Japan?
Could also be confusing podcast/reddit lingo for what was in the movie. It's all a bit blurry at this point.
Oh yeah the plan was originally Germany but once they surrendered Japan became the target
Idk if they mentioned that Japan had conditions to surrender without the bomb, they did say something about them not wanting to surrender
Right, I guess I might be misremembering whether or not Oppie knew -- at least in the movie -- before everything moved ahead. Like I kind of recall him in the room when they decided where to bomb trying to speak up against it?
Once this movie hits streaming/digital it's going to open a can of worms
I believe the government in Japan (I don't recall if it was a parliament or what they called it) was deadlocked and it fell to the emperor
Yeah I’m not fully sure but I remember them making a point of like the us government still wanting to drop the bomb even tho the Nazis had been defeated
They definitely made that point, I'm just trying to remember if Oppie tried to take a stand. I feel like he did but also could've completely made that scene up in my mind. I remember him saying something on the couch next to Matt Damon and being told to shut up
I don't believe Japan even surrended after the first bomb was dropped?
They did not. There was a full three days between the two bombs
During which time the Russians also staged a land invasion on the Japanese territory in China
Just read that part on Wikipedia too, yea. This is such a stupid comment to make, but history becomes even more bizarre to comb through as you get older.
Like, how is this real. How could something like this happen. And then you start to realize it could happen again and as you age up, it becomes even more terrifying to think that your life could be completely ruined in unimaginable ways. I also watched The Pianist a few weeks ago and I'm still kind of reeling from that. Sorry to be a downer.
It does kinda bug me that so much of the criticism around Oppenheimer is people just incapable of understanding that movie is told from a specific point of view
The eastern theater of the second world war was about as black and white as you could hope for in a conflict that large. One side was Nazis, the other side wasn't.
The Pacific theater was anything but
I mean I get what you mean by that. But at the same time, the film opens itself up by having a section that discusses things not from Oppenheimer’s POV to show more imo. Also the film chooses what to show like only showing his reaction to imagery of the bombings rather than showing any imagery itself. Theres interconnection between it all.
I get that, but it’s not like the black and white section isn’t also deeply rooted in another characters pov. Ultimately, just because the movie doesn’t call out a specific event as being a bad thing, it doesn’t mean it condones it
So, I haven't seen this movie (I just like this stuff) but I have read some interviews with Nolan.
It seems like the story that so captivated him was about Oppenheimer creating the bomb for America and then America stabbing him in the back.
Having seen the film, sorta but not really.
Theres a lot to think about in this film and I can’t wait to see it again.
Well I will because I want to watch it next at home where I can watch in a more thoughtful manner
My criticism isn’t failing to understand that, I dislike how narrow Nolan’s focus is for all his movies.
And that's kind of where the rub is. Because if you're Nolan and you just want to make a movie about Oppenheimer and his past catching up with him, you can see where he might get the idea that the reality of the atomic age (and not just the concept of it) is sort of irrelevant.
He just kind of cuts the parts out where it wouldn't be
Right, it’s not a criticism of the movie, it’s a criticism of Nolan being one to talk about the issues in this movie.
Because some of the audience will view his POV moments as a modern understanding of the events in the movie and they’re not.
Unrelated to this, someone I know saw Oppenheimer in 70mm IMAX and some how fell asleep at parts
And I am baffled as to how
Maybe a hot take, but if you get all your opinions on a real historical event from a Nolan movie, you may just be an idiot who certainly wasnt going to actually study what really happened regardless
To be clear, People arent dumb for wanting more in the movie
I will say if nothing else this makes me want to read even more about the events of the bombings.
And the aftermath
I mean, most people are that stupid though. It’s irresponsible not to acknowledge that.
Oh that too, my issue is with people who see the movie and think, YEP THATS THE TRUE STORY AND ALL I NEED TO KNOW. The flip side where people actually wanna learn more is definitely real, and id like to imagine more people are like this than not
I think there's also something to be said about a movie that's already 3 hours long not wishing to litigate a question that hasn't been satisfactorily answered in almost a century of historiography. But I can see where it might ultimately be sacrificing historical authenticity for story.
Yeah some people are gonna think that the movie is total fact and everything they need to know to understand the entire story, but is it really Nolans job to also add a bunch of stuff so those people dont have the wrong impression?
I think it’s Nolan’s job to recognize the impact his movie will have on people, yes.
Nolan wanted to tell Oppenheimers story from primarily Oppenheimers point of view. Thats what he did.
Like I said, it’s not a criticism of the movie so much as a criticism of Nolan taking on a mass death event from a narrow lens at all.
He didnt need to add a bunch of , by the way Americans suck for this specific reason, or have scenes in Japan dealing with the aftermath, thats not the story hes telling.
Nobody is stopping him from making what he wants, but it’s reasonable to criticize him for choosing to make it.
Do they talk much about Operation Downfall?
I just cant see the issue when he never pretended that this was the true story of the atomic bomb and all the facts
Again, I’m not saying he should have revised the movie as it exists, I’m challenging that he should have made a movie on this story from this POV at all.
No but he could have had a bit more pieces. The film I think at the end of the day is anti-nuke, but it doesn’t quite go far enough
My thing is, i dont think a ton of time needs to be spent hammering home the idea that nukes are bad, I think thats just a given
I don’t think it is a given? Most people still think America was justified in using them.
In the context of the movie though?
I rather don't. I will vilify Douglas McArthur and America's occupation of Japan quite happily, but the actual use of the bombs is perhaps the most fraught event in the 20th Century
Anyone who watched this movie and came out pro nuking japan is just an idiot and nothing you could have added would possibly change that in my honest opinion
the movie portrays the celebration after the bomb is dropped as being horrifying tho? I don’t see how that portrays the US as being justified
It does, but I think even that scene can easily be misinterpreted because it doesn’t go far enough.
Horrifying and justified aren’t opposites.
The bomb was always seen as horrific. That’s not new.
I’m just saying, given how Nolan crafts movies, I’d rather him not take on topics like this.
Because his narrow POV focus isn’t unique to this movie but is very limiting when discussing historical tragedies.
History in schools at least when I went did a lot of teaching on the horrors of the dropping of the bomb, but the myth of the necessity was also taught. This film reinforces that myth and it could have done a bit more to combat the myth I’d say.
Fair, but I think it’s still heavily implied that it wasn’t necessary
But I’ll add it wouldn’t be a Nolan movie if it did combat the myth. Because that would be pulling back from the POV.
I’m not sure, I’ll have to do readings on what Oppenheimer knew after the war about the necessity of dropping the bomb
Oppenheimer may have known, but publicly he defended it for a long time after.
It’s the challenge working from a single POV like this.
Yeah so looking at thing yep. But I think panning out from the POV at the end could have been done.
I just dont like the idea that single narratives dont work when its in the context of a bigger event. Nothing Nolan did was inaccurate or even that misleading
I think narrow lens on tragedies are always dangerous as a filmmaking technique.
I think ultimately that is the biggest issue of the film, the POV is limiting. Its a unique aspect of the film, but there was opportunity to pull away a bit and by not pulling away it hurts the message of the film. I do think the message of the film is you are supposed to feel conflicted on Oppenheimer as a person and his actions in regards to the bomb. You are supposed to celebrate his achievement while also recognizing that he himself and the wider would forever question if it should have been done in the first place. The problem is the film tries to do that by using the H-Bomb as a stand in of sorts for that and that doesn’t actually work.
@gloomy olive I’m starting more and more to agree with your stance on this film maybe should never have been made. I understand it at least more.
Are we supposed to celebrate the achievement though. Theres a scene of him nearly having a panic attack when hes actually being celebrated
Wasgo is saying everything I've been saying but more eloquently, ha ha ha.
yeah lol
I'm just saying if Nolan made a sympathetic POV movie about what it's like to be a Pedo, y'all would be like, DAFUQ??? a much easier concept to grasp.
No, you’re thinking of Woody Allen now.
I felt sympathetic to him because he basically lost control of the bomb and got fucked over by some random dude he made fun of one time, not because he was smart and invented something crazy
He has the panic attack when the bomb actually is dropped, but they celebrate and theres very little other than your own morals to signify that this is gross after the Trinity test
Is the movie sympathetic to Oppenheimer though. He didnt actually have to make the bomb, he wasnt forced unless I missed something major.
Also, sorry, but IMO, the idea of the american government stabbing someone in the back isn't new or clever.
Yes, I think the movie is sympathetic to Oppenheimer. Why would Nolan write the script in first person?
I'm not joking, I think a huge narrative of the film is "wah wah wah it's difficult to be a tortured genius especially when my ALLIES BETRAY ME" and I think Nolan absolutely does see himself as a bit of a tortured genius.
I generally just believe that when you’re mining historical tragedies, you have a responsibility the material that Nolan’s style of filmmaking would never meet.
The problem is that this is well within the context of a devastating historical event
So there are other factors at play here than one dude's dick measuring. Like go make a narrow POV about Bach.
I fault not so much his filmmaking and direction, but his script writing here. I think if he had brought in his brother John to co-write we would have had a much more nuanced script
Possibly. But Nolan loves his narrow focus and I don’t want to force him away from it.
Is it not accurate to what actually happened with Oppenheimer though. I totally get what you guys are saying, but I dont think the movie wants us to really feel bad for the guy moreso than show that hes a conflicted figure.
I mean, his narrow focus is his exact explanation for inaudible dialogue. He believes that audio should be from a POV.
I dont think the movie took a side on whether or not Oppenheimer is a hero or villain
His whole philosophy of filmmaking is around POVs.
I think framing it like this is pretty selfish and irresponsible from the filmmaker.
I agree with that. But I think its easy to misinterpret the film as viewing him as a hero
And to be honest, in terms of filmmaking, I don't think that the movie has to be either ALL oppenheimer or like, all the POV of Japanese/ Indigenuous pepole, honestly. Like what is the all or nothing mentality people have with that???
And thats the biggest issue
I’ve seen people I know who are smart and media literate misinterpret this film as being sympathetic towards Oppenheimer
I mean, you have people calling it and Dunkirk a documentary. People misunderstand Nolan's dedication to realism.
Again, this comes back to responsibility for me. Nolan could make a movie on almost any topic. Doing it on this one was irresponsible.
Does Nolan have to pander to people thinking they are watching the full true story though? I can see the argument, but i certainly dont think its irresponsible to make a movie about the guy, especially when he makes it as clear as humanely possible thats what it is
I do think Nolan has enough sense to say he can't be fully sympathetic to Oppenheimer, but I think his lack of attention for the people surrounding him, who suffered, leans more towards a sympathetic view than I am willing to excuse for.
Is someone misinterpreting the message a Nolan issue or an individual viewer issue
I don’t think it’s pandering. I think it’s recognizing the impact of his work.
If he was more interesting in telling a more nuanced story the women of the film would have been more fleshed out.
And before anyone goes on their "it was teh 1940s" bullshit again, women existed and had feelings and opinions and thoughts and were real humans then.
Now you are hoping for too much in a Nolan film
Next thing you’ll want diversity to be meaningful in a Nolan film.
True. But if he's going to be touted as this amazing filmmaker, you'd think he'd be able to expand beyond the cis white male.
I can agree with this lol
Barbie does a better job of handling the male gender than anything Nolan has ever done regarding women or anything outside of what he is.
It's tired, not wired.
Thats where I agree ultimately, I think Nolan in making this film should have thought more about the impact he has as a filmmaker.
Thats because Greta Gerwig is a better filmmaker than Nolan
Woaaahhh careful the Nolanheads will get you
But you know what? Greta Gerwig has to meet that expectation, as a woman. People are already pissed off enough about Barbie, imagine if she hadn't done the Kens justice.
Actually got an interesting Greta thing that I’m going to put in #tv-movies
People just go. Oh, Nolan, it's how he is. He's a male. It's just boy things.
Literal boys will be boys
Nolan has a fuckin wife y'all, yeeesh
All of these things culminate for me in just a lack of regard for others, which is why I still think it was irresponsible to make it.
“Oppenheimer’s story and Oppenheimer’s spirit have hung over a lot of my work,” Nolan says. “To finally address it head-on, it’s just something that I felt ready to do now.”
To Cz’s point, this is why Nolan made it.
I'm gonna get Nolan drunk one day and get him to admit that he thinks he's Oppenheimer reincarnated or some shit, I swear
The film itself is terrified by Oppenheimer’s accomplishment, reflecting its creator’s own fears for our future. “I don’t want to make a didactic film ever,” Nolan says. “I don’t want to tell people what to think or send a specific message.” But he also admits that after his journey through Oppenheimer’s life and work, there’s “there’s an inescapable nihilism that creeps in with the underlying reality that he changed the world in a way that can never be changed back. There’s no real catharsis there.”
Not wanting to tell people what to think is a questionable choice when you’re both sides’ing the atomic bomb.
But you just don't understand the movie Wasgo, he came down so hard on it. 😛
The cheering is bad!
He doesnt think hes Oppenheimer. He thinks hes the protagonist
Inaudible dialogue in Tenet was Nolan’s atomic bomb. The parallels are clear.
I guess it's a hot take of mine that I can't in good faith say that I'm 100% anti bomb. I think it was the most profoundly violent thing a human being has ever done against another, but I also think the rest of World War II would likely have come darn close if the war had continued. It's hard to say what I would have done in Truman's place.
Now, dropping the second one, on the other hand...
I don’t think it’s a hot take – this is one of the most debated moments in history. It’s an impossible question to answer “correctly”
Well, in this channel?
But the whole thing is if the US offered Japan surrender with the condition of the emperor maintaining power and not being charged with war crimes, they likely would have accepted. And guess what, the emperor maintained his position and wasn’t charged with war crimes
We’re solving everything on this discord
So….
The only other variable I can see to that Z is if the US post bombs went "Well, we may have over stepped so let's just call it even" in a sense as to why they ended up leaving the emperor in power.
It's also kind of a man-sized "if." IF Japan surrendered, it would have been great. We could fast forward to the unambiguously bad occupation of Japan.
Nolan's viewpoint aside, lets not forget that Japan was pretty fucking evil here. And there was another point that it was a race to beat the Germans. It started as a race to beat the Germans.
Like the bomb was going to be built. Either by the US or another world power. Whether or not Oppy decided to build it or not it was inevitable. Truman was the shitstain that decided to drop it. But again, its hard to argue if the use of the bomb was needed, or if it wasn't, then how many US lives would be given up should the war continue. Lets not forget how fucking fast Japan was progressing in taking over the pacific islands
Unit 731
I think everyone on the internet has done that horrific deep dive at least once
alongside that, the firebombing raids on Japan caused similar amounts of loss of life iirc
it wasn’t like the atomic bomb was the sole driver of the frankly horrific amount of casualties
exactly. If Nolan wanted to be political about it, he'd bring up one of the MANY atrocities that Japanese empire were committing at the time. Shit, he even brought up the question of it being "necessary" at that stage to drop it.
NEways, with that being said, for the movie itself, it was a 6.5/10 for me.
Far more died in the firebombings, actually
But the bomb had tons of additional casualities
Another fun fact; every recipient of the Purple Heart between 1945 and 2000 was given a medal minted during WW2 for the express purpose of accommodating all the losses they were expecting in a land invasion of Japan.
They still haven't used them all
And then, like Bagel said, there was the whole plan to cause an outbreak of Bubonic Plague in San Francisco.
I don't support America's efforts to eradicate Japanese culture after the war, but I don't think there were really any good guys in the Pacific
There's a reason most of the pulp war hero stories of the day take place in Europe
Jason Clarke always looks so angry
dr. j robert oppenheimer, you are a member of...
OPPENHEIMER: a member of...
the american communist party. isnt that right?
OPPENHEIMER: well nardwuar i nev—
dr. oppenheimer i have a gift for you today.
OPPENHEIMER: oh wow my wife's communist party card whered you find this
Likes
1518
Retweets
149
You’re J Robert Oppenheimer, we HAVE to know
You cut into your film strip while opening your package too?
Oh no, but it was bent to hell
Didnt realize yours was cut, just thiught it was bent
literally
Tempted but honestly likely not going to do it
Hope that they do like Interstellar and include a real film cell with the bluray
I was hoping they would bring back the post cards.
They’re up! And Sold out
No one is gonna read this but it was Jackson lamb in the Oval Office


