#Steam, licenses, laws and ethics
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
In the UK they have a law for that, too.
(iirc, consumer protection act or so)
@inland flax we can talk here
@wary canyon you have bought they key, correct. But you have the right to use it until you sell your key.
The purchase is a lifelong thing. (until selling the asset)
Steam allowed offline mode for a reason. (to reassure customers)
There is no point to this
You're just wrong though
I cannot even being to explain all of the ways you fundamentally misunderstand this topic
Yeah it seems like trolling at this point
Don't think steam even gives you a "Key" if you buy something
I don't blame you for misunderstanding. It could be a language thing but it seems like you just aren't reading what we are saying
You do get a key, it is just automatically registered. It is how specific copies can be recalled or deactivated
You don't own a game if you buy the license to play on Steam - it can be revoked and then you cannot play the game anymore (UNLESS it's an offline game and you have the data backed up -> it doesn't change that you don't own the game though!)
sorry, english isn't my native language, but i try to understand you
and i think, i get what you wanted to say.
But then again, this is no different, than when we purchased physical copies: we have not right to sell changed copies, because of spiritual property rights. In both cases (CD/DVD and steam copy), we only have the rights which are written in their EULA.
So there really is no difference.
legally i might not own it anymore, but then that law which allowed Steam to do that is itself non-legal (according to universal human rights)
morally, i still own it! (if i didn't harm them, by eg. reverse-engineeer it, etc)
No no no no no no no
You should do some research
Human rights have nothing to do with this
Stop confidentially spouting this nonsense you obviously know nothing about
there is the german Grundgesetz no law must speak against it.
This has been tested in court. California passed a new law which is requiring digital storefronts to say you don't own the games https://digitaldemocracy.calmatters.org/bills/ca_202320240ab2426
it is the foundational law, which all other countries have similar
we have very strong customer protection laws here in the EU and in FRG (Federal Republic of Germany)
There are ways to own games like GOG which has them DRM free, there are ways to get around it like your offline stuff but at the end of the day on Steam YOU ARE PURCHASING A LICENSE
ok, maybe i have to formulate it this way:
our customer protection law in FRG allows us to treat these games as if we own them like a DVD (if we dont harm the interests of the developers)
You are either naive or a troll and I'm done
this is a conversation that's been had multiple times with multiple people over multiple years, and the outcome is the same
you don't like the answer you've been given, butyou're arguing with the wrong people
California law is not applicable in FRG
That isn't the point. The point is Steam is the same service all over the world and all versions of steam are carrying a message saying it is just a license
even big corps like steam must obey german laws in FRG
and european laws in EU
GERMAN LAWS DON'T COUNTER THIS
STEAM IS JUST SELLING LICENSES
I'm not in the US, I am in the Isle of Man. That message is still there because that is what steam is selling
@mortal frigate this graphic is relevant to you:
yeah, but Steam has not the right to revoke a license, if the purchaser doesn't harm the interest of the developer of the game he bought
also the purchaser must not harm Steam itself, of course
@inland flax it's not worth your time, you can't fight belief with reason
You are right. I need to commit to actually stepping back
It just felt like it should be so easy. Steam sells licenses. Steam says they sell licenses. You buy something on Steam. You buy a license.
licenses can only be revoked, if justified by actions of the user
and playing a game is never a justification (if not cheating in online games)
of course, if you break the rules of a game, that could mean, you lose that license
but unless you do that, you own your stuff
"Valve may restrict or cancel your Account or any particular Subscription(s) [steam purchases] at any time in the event that (a) Valve ceases providing such Subscriptions to similarly situated Subscribers generally, or (b) you breach any terms of this Agreement (including any Subscription Terms or Rules of Use). In the event that your Account or a particular Subscription is restricted or terminated or cancelled by Valve for a violation of this Agreement or improper or illegal activity, no refund, including of any Subscription fees or of any unused funds in your Steam Wallet, will be granted." No one disputes that
Ok, done now. Here's the subscriber agreement, read it: https://store.steampowered.com/subscriber_agreement/
it is as i said: they can only revoke a license, if it's justified to do so, never without justification
that was my whole point: ethics are to be obeyed, even by big corps
And as I said no one said otherwise. You are just inventing points. At this point I think you are a troll and well done to you. You got me, I thought I was helping someone
and if a corporation does not obey a moral/ethic, then the user has the right to continue using their product (even if "revoked")
I admire your persistence
i think you misunderstood me the whole time :/ (sorry)
I don't. I am shouting at a brick wall expecting it to change and it is doing me no good. I am however now past the point of caring and can just laugh
in the beginning, i meant, that Steam has no rights to revoke a key from a user, who behaves lawfully, that was my whole point all the time.
And if Steam does revoke a key unethically, then the user has the right to use their copy of the game.
Yeah, no it wasn't
And if it was I don't know why it was
You were the only one talking about it
sorry, i should have made that clear from the beginning :/