#MIC BATTLES!! XM8500 VS MACKIE-EM89D
22 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Mackie in my opinion is the better option. just $30 more dollars and you can definitely hear that bright sound difference in the 2 mics. XM is good if $20 is all you can spare but going with the mackie will definitely not be a waste by any means!!
you know any mics that works well with beatbox?
been trying research them
hmm
the shure SM58 is also really good at the $100 price range and the AKG D5 is also a killer option for around $85 i think
i was thinking sennheiser e835
its good as well yes
i think its has a more cone sound to it on the low end though. thats just my opionion, im a more power beatboxer so the low end is super important on a mic for me
just trying to find a decent mic with affordable prices
all around affordable with best sound would be the Mackie EM-89D
bro amazon price on mackie em-89D is 69.99 but it only cost 49.99
amazon is on something bro
Alright, based on my research so far, I think the sm58 is the best option if you want to go for a powerful sound at this price point. But to be honest, in this price range, you can make any of these mics sound powerful with eq, but the sm58 has more eq room than any other mic in this price range. And from what I've seen so far, it gives a good balance of clarity and power in beatboxing compared to other mics (The d5 being kind of airy because of the high end and the sennheiser being too dynamic to give powerful kicks and other sounds in the low end spectrum)
Especially if you're more of a technical beatboxer