When your question is answered use !solved to mark the question as resolved.
Remember to ask specific questions, provide necessary details, and reduce your question to its simplest form. For tips on how to ask a good question run !howto ask.
#I would like to ask new CPU holders to test that small code snippet
wary roseBOT
uneven olive
the thing is mine returns 12 threads as I have 6core CPU , interesting what it will do where CPU thread are not a double of amount of cores (new intel CPUs with E and P cores)
light iris
why use the WINAPI?
uneven olive
I can't test that as I have no PC that runs new CPU , but if anyone can , thank you in advance
what I can use ?
light iris
ah okay
uneven olive
new intel CPU holders (with E and P cores) if you have a time please test that code cpp #include <iostream> #include <windows.h> int main() { SYSTEM_INFO CPU_Cores; GetSystemInfo(&CPU_Cores); std::cout<<CPU_Cores.dwNumberOfProcessors; return 0; } what number it gives to you ? thanks in advance
wary roseBOT
@uneven olive Has your question been resolved? If so, run !solved :)
pliant cargo
I could tell you that mine without running it will return 32, but that's also AMD and not Intel with their new system
old locust
new intel CPU holders (with E and P cores) if you have a time please test that c...
i get 8
and ye indeed i have 8
old locust
💀 ?
desert timber
uneven olive
@shrewd kindle ok thanks
wary roseBOT
@uneven olive Has your question been resolved? If so, run !solved :)
shrewd kindle
Sorry, 11th gen
uneven olive
no problem , thanks
river hamlet
again, you can just look up how many P cores, E cores, and threads any given CPU has
you don't need someone to run some utility to find that out
it's all there right on the intel website 🤷♂️
river hamlet
i'm quite confused as to what's so funny about this
shrewd kindle
I really don't understand what you are trying to do Monke
what dot is suggesting sounds extremely reasonable, and you didn't provide much details that would suggest otherwise
river hamlet
the code they asked us to run simply queries the number of logical CPUs, which is just gonna be the number of hardware threads…
(at least on systems with less than 64 threads)
shrewd kindle
I expected some differences out weird behavior in newer architectures that they are investigating or sth similar
river hamlet
from what i've seen, e vs p cores are pretty transparent to applications
uneven olive
what dot is suggesting sounds extremely reasonable no , not even close to be a reasonable
not saying about extremely or super
light iris
I mean it's fairly reasonable
river hamlet
lol
light iris
the thing is we don't know what you are trying to do
uneven olive
how much accounts you guys have here 🙂
light iris
what
river hamlet
you asked us to run and tell you the output of some piece of code that will print the number of logical processors
i told you that you can simply look up the number of logical processors on the manufacturer's website
light iris
and regardless even then knowing the number of logicall processors isn't that important in most cases
river hamlet
this is information that is readily available online. there is absolutely no need to rely on people running code for you on their machines to find out how many logical processors a given intel CPU has.
uneven olive
I can't believe that looooooooool
river hamlet
wtf are you on about lol
wary roseBOT
@uneven olive
river hamlet
lol
uneven olive
yes it is helpfull surely 🙂 when you have clown like dot involved
river hamlet
mate
whatever
i can tell you with certainty that the number of logical processors on a modern intel CPU is just what it says on the website
i recently built a pc for my dad with a 12600K and it reports exactly that number of CPUs
you can also trivially verify this by watching any review of the CPU or smth and checking out what their task manager looks like
light iris
I mean can you explain to me why you think dot is being a clown? cause from my point of view they are saying a fairly reasonable thing