What is our stance on fully automated | Home Assistant | Page 1

zenith sail Mar 23, 2026, 11:05 AM

#

I think we should require a human in the loop for all PRs.

#

We want to talk to a human when reviewing PRs.

#

I think we should adopt something similar as this:
https://github.com/astral-sh/.github/blob/main/AI_POLICY.md

odd zenith Mar 23, 2026, 11:21 AM

#

I like that very much

wooden saffron Mar 23, 2026, 11:51 AM

#

I'd agree with that, frontend too. I'd also like the bot/copilot to check if the template is followed and has been completed by a human - have a list of known bots, not foolproof but still something

queen jolt Mar 25, 2026, 11:52 AM

#

Seems like this claw-explorer bot is now hanging around in integrations starting with A

#

do we want to keep it around or block it for now

odd zenith Mar 25, 2026, 11:59 AM

#

queen jolt do we want to keep it around or block it for now

block it?

queen jolt Mar 25, 2026, 12:04 PM

#

block the account

#

like if we don't want AI generated contributions without a human in the loop, should we keep it open

zenith sail Mar 25, 2026, 12:13 PM

#

I say no.

odd zenith Mar 25, 2026, 12:41 PM

#

I meant "block it."

odd zenith Mar 27, 2026, 7:37 PM

#

there are still a couple claw-explorer PRs open, should I close them?

wooden saffron Mar 30, 2026, 1:56 PM

#

I reckon we could programatically do the PR template checks with a bot. similar to the cla/stale bot. Check if the template has been followed, add a label (so we can filter these) and draft the PR. Give a shorter time to update, then close if not compliant then.

Probably something core, frontend. home-assistant.io etc could all benefit from

odd zenith Apr 1, 2026, 7:58 AM

#

I opened a PR for an AI policy (parts taken from astral, because I like that one) https://github.com/home-assistant/core/pull/167047

#What is our stance on fully automated