#War Brokers needs this | Game Leaderboards
1 messages ยท Page 1 of 1 (latest)
If yโall don't WB to die soon then you developers MUST come up with something the community wants.
well said
are you saying you represent the whole community though?
๐ No i am not
it's fine to represent what you believe
just be careful not to try speaking for everyone
I represent the competitive players
right... refer to above
Okay
you can speak only for yourself
the competitive side is also a minority, so while it's nice to accommodate for them it should never be done at detriment to the 99%
because that's what actually hurts the game
I think someone analysed where Halo took competitive players for all feedback and the game got worse and worse to enjoy
may i ask
not sure, have yet to read whole thing
okay sir
I'm just putting some warnings out
why
"On the off-chance that any developers may be watching this video, I put forth a simple proposition: stop listening to competitive players quite so much. Stop designing your games around the experience of pro players."
The beginning of a video on the matter. I will not post it as I cannot guarantee there is no language.
Yes
The minority. And that's what he said
The core of the message is that in chasing what pros want, you can end up making the game unfun, hard to get into, unbalanced, etc. to the majority.
it'll benfit pros but
normal people can just play
But if it helps 1% and hurts 99%
ok here's an analogy
let's say we have 10,000 players
only about 200 - 300 online at once
of those 10,000 players you have the 1% (100 players)
we make 100 players happy
the feature is fine for about half of the playerbase
they don't care
and then the remaining 49% or so get annoyed by the feature
and start to play less
we now are annoying 4,900 players
and potentially losing 4,900 players
just to make 100 players happy
wait wdym play less
features have to be carefully balanced to cater to the whole playerbase, because yes it is nice to make the 1% happy, but a wrong choice actually hurts the game a LOT
as in they get annoyed
stop playing every day to once a week
then once a month
then they just can't put up with it and quit
back to your suggestion
please explain why the leaderboard should be added, what kind of benefits it provides, etc.
Yes sir
okay so
lb's should be added\
imo
cuz
waiiit
first
plague
is it hard to code something like this in?
more than you probably think
it can look simple but take over a week to actually program
Ah yes. The development cost should be covered by the gains of the addition.
Traffic/players.
Be added value.
A week.
I was expecting like 1 month
if you look at actually testing and debugging, then yes easily
setting up an initial thing, probably a week
Costs of a week is mroe than you initially think with time. If only I could now and then get a developer do a task for me for a week. It is scattered along longer time period.
I'm still curious on the why though
the devs know best what would and would not be simple
AND, the cost os more than ones hourly tax.
While knowing nothing about such database remodelling work/ new stats page that follows frequent data changes, I'll make a crude reference to SQL. Pomp would be more proficient to tell what it actually could take.
lol
It would be good cuz it actually will promote players into playing the game more and being hgh on the lb
@orchid ocean
bruh no one?
theres actually a lot of stuff i want in wb
but developers lazy
Hard? Nothing is ever "hard" per-se, but very often complicated, tedious, time-consuming, and frequently without a straightforward solution.
wdym
Am I understanding you correctly in that you are looking for a ranking system of some sort?
yes.
DM me
Data-wise it's not an issue. Same sort of processing as the ELO percentile calcs, just expanded to include more factors (kills, whatever else is included in the calculation). From a SQL side it just takes a trigger for those events to automatically adjust those numbers. Depending on how the DB is set up, 30k kill triggers/day isn't that unreasonable processing power-wise. If anything it can tie into the ELO calc logic as a secondary output.
what do ya think
for @spark mist
Speaking of formula, how do you propose this ranking be calculated?
each kill gains an amount of score
Is that a fixed amount?
and thats like the points sytem
yes
You realize that we have this already, right?
Did you make the daily top 30 players in War Brokers? Find out here.
thats kills
just scaled by whatever point amount
which is equal to kills x points per kill
so if it's say 1 point per kill, you're just displaying kills while taking an unnecessary extra step
I'm not seeing a reason for this
im proposing that this lb should be put into t he GAME
and I'm countering by saying it already has been