#Buff Inquisitor Defence
12 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Not a fan of removing something that a ton of players have already built characters around.
The better way to do it would be to introduce an upgrade mechanic like masori/fortified masori
Why does slash get oathplate as direct drop how is that fair to crush? We get paper armor and have to complete hardest raid to upgrade it?
yeah realistically theyre not going to take inq away from 30 defense accounts
I mean i agree with upgrade scape just not at a raid
maybe they can drop another boss that drops shards to upgrade it
The precedent for upgradescape in raids is already there with ToA and masori.
The Gielinor justice system does not process questions of "melee armour fairness" despite numerous player lawsuits.
That’s not same your talking upgrading inquisitor now if inquisitor dropped from raid and you could split that’s different. Having to have high crafting and 100m to split a item is mad
What do you mean? If the new armour is a crush set then it'll likely be inquisitor that'll end up being turned into "inquisitor shards" and then put into the new armour to fortify it. Not the other way around.
That's only if it's a crush set and if they want to keep inq relevant through upgrading/fortifying. Big if. Though it would help the people that complain about inq rates. If inq gets the shard treatment then that's a soft form of dry protection since dupes would still give shards for upgrading.