#Make Bow of Faerdhinen (c) tradable for GIM.

48 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

novel cypress
#

One of the appeals of our group iron is that we get to share in the drops that we get. It is unfortunate that when you create a corrupted bofa you are suddenly unable to share with your groupmates. Knocking out venator shards and godwars drops with the group is really fun as we get to all benefit from our progress. It feels sad that we do not get to experience this with the gauntlet.

iron parcel
#

gauntlet grind is just part of iron 🤷‍♂️
and eclipse gear isnt much worse in a lot of places

novel cypress
errant plover
#

Just don't corrupt it and you're good.

novel cypress
mint hill
#

It’s a pretty valid tradeoff, just keep it low-charge and you can put in a few shards as needed and swap it back and forth

novel cypress
mint hill
#

It’s literally as simple as what items are tradeable. You’re playing a game mode with restrictions on it that are extremely straightforward

novel cypress
mint hill
#

Where do you draw the line? I don’t think it’s a good precedent to make untradeables tradeable. It would make significantly more sense to make the corrupted bow tradeable before making this change work just for GIM, but that’s an even worse proposal

novel cypress
# mint hill Where do you draw the line? I don’t think it’s a good precedent to make untradea...

Currently I draw the line at the Bow of Faerdhinen (c). Ah, your concern is that the infernal cape is next. However, that isn't what I'm proposing. Just a bow that is tradable at one point and not tradable at another point. Not really sure why that is "an even worse proposal". If it isn't what other people want, then they shouldn't be affected by it. Trading a bofa amongst groupmates won't have an impact on other players who don't play GIM.

charred path
#

If an item is untradeable to mains, it should stay untradeable to gims aswell.
All types of ironman game mode are an extention to the main game, and those gamemodes shouldnt posses buffs that the mains cant access

novel cypress
# charred path If an item is untradeable to mains, it should stay untradeable to gims aswell. A...

I am not a main account and cannot speak for what they want. However, saying that mains don't want something that doesn't affect them should not prevent it from becoming a feature for GIM. Just let Mains vote and GIMs vote and whatever they want can happen. Riding the fence of "GIM shouldn't have this if mains don't" and then following it with "mains don't want this" just stops a feature that wouldn't have helped them anyways. Whether it is tradable on the GE or not does not affect me. I just want to be able to throw it in group storage.

charred path
#

No what i am saying is, that if GIMs should be able to trade it, so should mains and therefor all other types of accounts

novel cypress
charred path
#

I am not saying no to your suggestion, by all means add it. I dont really care. But no update should ever be added, that affects 1 player type, but not mains.
since all player types are an extention of mains. Any GIM account can revert to a main at any time

mint hill
#

Yeah that’d basically sum up my thoughts too

charred path
#

I also dont play a main, so i dont think it matters what type of account you play to see how the suggestion doesnt make sense to only allow gims it

novel cypress
novel cypress
charred path
#

Any poll for a gim buff wouldnt just be gims voting though, so if you want to change something and not allow mains to do it, gl with getting your suggestion through a poll

novel cypress
charred path
#

No because if it becomes tradeable, then i could also drop it from my iron to my money alt.

novel cypress
mental flame
#

My group skipped it and just got a tbow. Hate that place only one dude has a set and it’s untradable as it is with mains as well. Don’t think that should change.

novel cypress
amber ledge
#

Just get the tbow drop duh

glass moon
#

There are a handful of items like this that just aren't designed well for GIM. The new avernic treads are another example of an item that's needlessly painful to use for GIM, and wildy weapons are borderline useless with their forced 1k ether requirement which already a huge ask without bot farms subsidizing it for mains

I know they said they didn't want special cases for GIM, but the alternative is just bad game design and unbalances content that just doesn't work properly with the game mode

cedar orbit
#

For bofa (c) to be tradable you would also have to make crystal shards and the armour tradable as well for main accounts.

It feels fine how it is. Grind out a bofa if you want your own corrupted version. You can still trade it as is just uncorrupted

novel cypress
charred path
cedar orbit
#

This would also set a precedent for future untradables. Gims have been asking this for different things throughout the years

glass moon
novel cypress
cedar orbit
novel cypress
cedar orbit
#

Sadly you can't balance an item and all use cases. Yes it would suck to corrupt a bofa and not be able to trade it with your team. If I was a gim it would be a "the first enhanced is for me, the second is for the team"

novel cypress
cedar orbit
#

Counter argument - bofa when corrupt should give you back the crystal shards when you revert it

novel cypress
cedar orbit
glass moon
#

Did you also know that reverting a Bofa or salad blade costs even more shards? It's a pretty dumb system

cedar orbit
novel cypress
cedar orbit
novel cypress
cedar orbit
#

Gl on your endeavours 🫡