#GIM QOL Changes - Moved to new post
107 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
100% needed
GIM QOL Changes
I am with this! We definitely need to make it more group friendly!

Love the offline poh, but why would you need to share marks of grace?
I agree about poh but disagree with untradables
Honestly, marks of grace was a suggestion from a group member, although i still agree with the crystal shards and xeric talisman. Im not asking for All untradeables just a select few
Those are things each account already has to get in their own means, poh is a QoL because unrestricteds can already get housing access, where as the group is within their own means
But untradables to accounts are just that, only for the user
I think PoH quality of life to divide responsibility is okay. It's a gray area for items but realistically I'd lean more on you'd have to get it within your own means. And ironmen already make the effort, crystal items are untradable and buying uniques is a reach around by unrestricted
Plus crystal shards are also literally quest restricted to handle/get use out of
I understand your point, I'm coming from a place where perhaps a member cannot do that content or someone is delegated to do a certain content.
If they can't do that then they shouldn't, it's the same principle as how teleports don't work in PoH if you can't access the content
Like lunar isle
Just an example, teleport salts are also restricted by quests but can be tradeable
Like I said, i fully understand why they are untradeable but no harm in suggesting the option in my eyes
but they are useless to trade if the quest isnt done
Yeah I get the QoL for sure
But realistically the currency trading is like SLIGHT pandering
And it creates unique situations where a GIM technically has access that other accounts dont
Which is like the opposite of the spirit of the account type
ofc im coming from a place where the quest would be completed
Like theoretically you could just farm teleport shards if you really wanna give your teammates currency
It's not pragmatic, but it wouldn't give any more advantage than what's already in the game
Like if one of your gim teammates get spooned af on tele crystals or something
make the crystal from cg tradable between gim group
Are you talking the seeds or the shards
Shards
Agree with others about PoH more than untradeables
Nice title though. I wonder what other stuff would go in GIM QoL poll if they had one
Maybe groups can have like a group house
Like in clan houses or stuff idk
Basically everyone can edit the house
Everyone the leader says can. Certain authority should have to be given
I believe Offline POH is not possible due to where the poh data is being held. Its tied to the player and server wont load that data with the player being offline
Would a group home then?
YES, I had this idea a while back but you brought the thought back. I'll add it to the post as an edit 👍
The offline POH would be QOL for everyone let’s be honest
How so? Mains can just go to house parties. Irons cant access anyone elses. GIM's have the only benefit, or alts of the GIM
this thread is for GIMS which is what i mean when i say everyone
Not having to hop to w330 and then off w330 would still be a plus tbf
solo ironman choose to be locked to themselves at the end of the day GIMs are a group why wouldnt we be able to use eachothers houses if im offline or the others offline..
Isn't that a little moot point BECAUSE they already can use each other's homes, GIMs tend to branching path to get numerous things taken care of
@ chillin
Im saying that i am all for offline poh for GIM, just doesnt make sense for other account types.
@ aces, I use my tm8's house all the time when he is on, he has the occult altar done, I do not. So i would love to be able to access his poh when hes not on, as I play more frequently
that's a bit too OP for a QOL imo, even mains struggle to get a max house and most use the world 330 for prayer training and so on, you being able to log in whatever world you prefer (with low pop for example) and be able to use everything that a max POH has to offer (if this is the case for your GIM teamate) sounds a bit unbalanced
Not when you consider how much the group had to pool together and spend to get that one maxed house.
Thats also IF the group contributed, lets be honest on that. But if offline poh came to fruition, pooling would be more common for sure
Yeah Hundo my bad I should have been more clear in my message I meant everyone as in GIM
ahhh gotcha, nw
Shared gim mansion.
Minimum 2bedrooms per groupsize. Butlers cost per gim size.
Example 5players. 10xbedrooms 5x butler cost
Cant access houze at same time until the rooms are in place.
Overkill frfr but so is offline house.
Just get your own pool guys.
This isn't QoL, it's what we call the "QoL"
if people want their own occult altar they can either get neccessary items themselves or ask their teammate if they'd be willing to get some of these for them instead. Could make some kinda deal with them as well
~1500 mahogany logs or ~2000 teak logs per week of miscellania per player.
You can bank 80+ construction in no time as a group
Probably that work for you but not for all
And all we asking for a to be able to use other gims member houses if they offline
More of an engine issue ig
What do you mean? Can't afford to pay 750k/ week? At the point where you look at max poh you should be able to afford it
Its a pretty standard ironman thing to do kingdom
Brother it's not about that
Like for example we wanted to focus our resources on one guy
To rush best house
And we can all use it
I get the sentiment, but it's probably a value vs effort issue most likely for jagex
Ok not everyone have the time you know
Unfortunately unless you acc share, and like Aces mentioned earlier its an engine issue and is not possible without some serious dev time put into it
Yeah they'd have to redo how housing info is done
Fair enough
Cuz the server pulls up the info whilst you're logged in
If you were to look into Q&A vod from GIM release they did talk there about such features
If they added a cache it could work but it'd also be very likely resource nomming
More specifically PoH data is tied onto a Player Save
Then we can do a something like clan hall to gims
^
Accommodating for GIM when they're already getting the added benefits of group play stuff
@wide egret all I can reccommend for you is get planks and do mahogany homes. Ever since QoL updates to it, it's become a really damn nice way to train cons
I think the housing thing would be amazing btw but I don't see it as serviceable to ask for a bit as a restricted account
Like I'm not against it I'm just not sure if it's feasible/worth the effort for jamflex for the specific situation
Yeh probably
The asking price of a good house is a little bit obnoxious as irons but I mean that's just one of the long term goals that's tackled
Ideally in an active group you just play together anyway, or in future situations make sure your most active player likely does the money sink planks
Yeh I get it
I was saying would be nicer if only we coulda also use it if he is offline also
But it is what it is
I guess
GIM means GROUP once again with all due respect this isn’t about solo Ironmans this is about groups that want to use each others houses while offline at the end of the day they can put it to poll and that would be the decision we love the suggestions but this is about what we aren’t able to do not what we can in game at the moment. Cheers m8s
Offline POH ftw
And what wrong if we made the crystal shards tradable between gim members
^
If you want to trade crystal shards, you are better off thieving for eternal teles, trade those to break down. I dont see much of a reason for shards themselves to be tradable
While this is likely true, mods & folks in comments often said this about offhand Imcando Hammer
And then they delivered it like a week after it was polled lmao
for that they could pull some code off RS3
its an existing system in their company
I don't know that that's how that works
I'm just saying - everything takes work, not our job to scope it out or even prioritize, just to raise issues we'd like worked on.
If it's a big enough priority I can see it but wouldn't be surprised if they were less inclined to content that only affects a specific playerbase that plays on a restriction, but considering Jagex polled for Perilous armor to have a 1 def option I guess anythings possible if the demand is high enough
But the offline PoH accommodation would only affect GIMs because mains would just find a different maxed house, and irons can't to begin with
So from a scope this is like only affecting a specific niche, and then there's the comparison of how much work for them would it take to draw upon data or I guess "port" the saved instance to other players to access it, or even what would the restrictions be, like can only GIMs use this feature, is it for friends of the iron as well. Etc
And then that q guy quits. Team fails.
Find a reliable team 😉
Ok for some reason when i was editing the post it got automod deleted for spam? i will get it fixed if i can sorry!
Unfortunately i was not able to recover the comment above nor can they restore the option to edit and do it from scratch and i was suggested to create a new post.
If you would like to support the idea or keep the discussion going here is the link https://discord.com/channels/324132423636090880/1275053931319525436 .
I will be closing this thread soon, thank you for all your inputs! Hope to see you all at the new post 👋