#Be able to assign pets as thralls
212 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Idk man makes perfect sense that you would have control over your pet after you get it
i think this is a perfect way to implement without being gamebreaking
+1 Max hit is gamebreaking
pets are supposed to be cosmetics and should stay that way
cosmetic overrides are fine but shouldnt have stats
people are already asking for thralls to do guaranteed damage instead of 0-3
that kinda works like a max hit
thralls are already extremely good bc they always hit
its free dps
so buffing it would be pretty op and very stupid if locked behind a 1/5000 drop
they dont always hit they can hit zero they also require you to drain 6 prayer each time and have to bring book of dead and if you want death charge aswell thats already 3 invo spots not excactly free dps
also thats why you should be able to rent them so for accounts that dont have pets
they dont always hit they can hit zero
someone doesnt know the difference between a successful hit and a 0
[[Divine rune pouch]]
Wiki links found:
https://oldschool.runescape.wiki/w/Divine_rune_pouch
@pulsar perch I thought he meant they always do damage relax.
Its free dps in any setup where you dont need other spells, which is most of them, and inventory space is usually not so highly constrained that book of the dead is an issue, especially considering its something like 0.6 dps in a game where most people will usually be doing between 5 and 10 dps most of the time.
in any case if it was desirable to buff thralls it would still not be a good idea for it to come from pets 🤷
the key significance of thralls is that they guarantee hits though
so to me it sounded like you dont even know what thralls do
look i still havent seen you debunk 1 thing ive said so im not convinced its a bad idea, also people asking for book of dead to not take a invo space and also want thralls to hit guaranteed between 1-3
please give feedback even if negative
I'm fine if it's completely cosmetic. Having a a +1 max hit and a dps boost based purely on if you get a pet or not is absurd
No, cosmetics and gameplay shouldnt mix
yes levi but the balance would be able renting to the taxidermist guy
that's a bad idea tbh
none of you guys are giving reasons though
if they made the RL plugin where your pets are your thralls, but actually implemented into the main game, that's a huge W
you're saying pets get a max hit, but you have to "corrupt" them, and they die after 1000 hits
@dusty jacinth thats are cool idea
I shouldn't have to give a reason as to why thats bad
no im saying you can rent corrupt pets for those accounts that dont have pets already
i would also charge a lot of money
whats the main problem you have with the idea? is it the max hit or mixing cosmetics, because i really dont see 1 max hit being game breaking and also dont see how getting 1/3000 drop should only be cosmetic
im also only suggesting only pvm pets get max hits not skilling
i like this idea
i recently just hit the leviathan pet at 2k kc and its just collecting dust in my bank...
in that case im a -10
not even just -1
yea but why should people be annoyed other peoples thralls have 1+ max hit cause they have a pet
if they dont have 1
pets are intended to be cosmetic lol
thats not a reason.. the game has evolved so much and we used to have rules in place similar to "pets are cosmetics" but then broke them for quality of life for the game
like what
?
no im saying we've had old school stuff changed to keep up with modern updates
I reread but still don’t follow
so even though pets were intended as cosmetics doesnt mean they cant change that
name a rule (or whatever) that currently exists which acts as quality of life
which used to be purely cosmetic
i wasnt referring to cosmetics
so what is the relation
im saying osrs have updated 20 year old classic things in the game to keep up, they dont do it often but its been done
yes, but those aren't cosmetics being turned into qol
Pets and cosmetics should remain cosmetics for sure
this is a cosmetic that firstly, isn't being "turned into qol"
whats the difference?
it would be a massive change
the difference is that pets are cosmetic
and your changes you're talking about
Also yeah a 33% buff to already insanely good dps isn’t “qol”
But even qol I would disagree with
Pets are the one thing in this game that is explicitly a “flex item”
And that’s good
it's like a visible trophy to other people that you've taken the time to grind out a boss solely for a purely cosmetic look
not for a boost to dps
not to mention people would just farm the easiest bosses for this dps increase lol
scurrius or mole for melee for example
ive considered this i would restrict its to certain pets
with pets being cosmetic, they are purely a visual flex
no slayer or skilling pets and low level
like what
ah ok
so basically
verzik pet, sol heredit pet, and olmlet
nibbler too
maybe even penance queen
definetly those but all godwars pets i would include, maybe zulrah all dt bosses i would include, kbd kalphite and nightmare
you said nno low level pets
why are we including gwd and kbd and kq
and zulrah
im confused
yea there low level but if your talking about rarity of getting these pets its pretty high level
getting bandos as a pet a lot harder than a slayer pet
even though its considered low lvl boss or whatever
this post bro 
wdym
@dusty jacinth his got good points tbh
he really, really doesn't
@pulsar perch Look i havent sat down and thought about exactly which pet should be given the max hit buff
The problem is that none of them should
but im sure thats not to hard to figure out which one deserve it
In fact, if you restrict it to specific pets
also by this reasoning, zuk pet is considered easier than gauntlet pet to get
It’s even worse tbh
not only are you randomly giving a 33% buff to something, and calling it "qol", you're stating that this actual and legitimate powercreep is "qol" and the reasons are because pets are hard to obtain, which is true, but completely irrelevant, and because the game is 20 years old and things change all the time
i took 6700 kc for my leviathan pet, can I have 2 max hits please?
hold the ketchup
We don’t need to lock a significant dps increase behind 1/3000-1/5000 drops
also at ehb rate, bandos pet is 86h and ggs pet is 81h
thats 81h excl time taken to get the slayer tasks
so in reality it's longer than bandos pet
dont tell me about this 33% damage buff calculators tell you you get 400% increase damage using thralls at callisto
wat
What is that even supposed to mean
im saying 1 max hit to thralls will NOT break the game
0-3 maxhit is avg 1.5 per attack, 0-4 maxhit is avg 2 per attack, 33% increase
woah did u dps calc that?
Thralls are already insanely powerful and don’t need an arbitrarily locked increase behind 1/3000-1/5000 pets
it jsut doesnt make sense
Thralls are like +8% dps in my toa gear for example as-is
AGAIN, you had me in the first half. If its cosmetic only, and your pets act as thralls with no gameplay changes, thats a gigantic W
crazy how smart you's act but legit havent debunked 1 thing ive said
If you think that’s minor, ok
everything else respectfully is on par with oscord suggestions
i promise not 1 thing
we told you how riduclous it is to say a buff like that is qol
i rate that idea
we told you how ridiculous it is to lock a dps increase for EVERY build in the game behind a 1/3000-1/5000 cosmetic drop
@dusty jacinth i wanna ask about your idea about a thrall following you around as a pet?
What exactly do you mean by debunked
why
thralls are thralls
you want thralls to be made into pets?
do you mean like it permantlety follows you around?
either that, or when you actually use summon thrall, the pet you already have out acts as a thrall
I'm so sorry people have asked for this many times, it's finally here
Sub if you're not already, your sub notification will inspire more videos
Follow me on Twitch! Twitch.tv/Extillian
Follow me on Twitter! https://twitter.com/extileyt
Join our Discord! https://discord.gg/g5zrTfQmJq
Or Join "Dream" clan in game for a fun that never ends.
yes this is big, if it was in the main game and not outdated it would be hype
ye agreed
no levi pet can be used : (
thats what I thought this post was about
and then it turned into an avg reddit suggestion
yea at the very least be able to use pets at thralls i still think giving certain pets a max hit would be the play but would still be hype if i could bring levi to raids
0 max hits because it's literally just a model swap
a model swap doesnt need a max hit change
its a model swap
we should give scythe of vitur +1 max hit when you use a sanguine ornament kit on it
i don't see the problem adding a plus 1 max hit to thralls
im really not sure what he doesnt understand
i dont even understand what i dont understand anymore
how come people dont have a problem with thralls being changed to guranteed hits. @last scaffold can u calculate dps increase on that?
they aren't being changed to guaranteed hits
they have and always have been guaranteed
there is no change
i hear a lot of upvotes on that
also
upvotes on a reddit suggestion?
actually you know what
ive been watching to much sae bae maybe
i would +1 adding max hits to thralls
but only under 1 condition
4.6bil skill xp
any thoughts
i knew u were skiller :0
and zuk helm
Thralls already are guaranteed hits yeah
i like that idea
you need grandmaster Cas+ 200m all
or would that be grand grand masters
i agree
gm+1
If you can’t see that your disagreement is with damage calc not thralls
how do we contact the jmods?
@last scaffold no bro im saying thralls hit between 0-3 and people want it changed to gurantee hit
so 1-3
you dont lol
thralls technically are a guaranteed hit atm
instead of a miss or a splash 0, its a hit but 0
@dusty jacinth i thought it just ignores defense
no no no
well technically yeah
but it will always roll between 0-3 no matter what
but yea i get what your saying
Ignoring defense is the same thing as always hitting
it will ALWAYS hit between 0-3, and the 0 is in fact a hit, and not a miss
Unless the monster is immune/reduced damage to the style ofc
yea but im saying people want it to hit 1-3 everytime
Why though
and i dont see massive complaints to that