I'm not entirely sure how entirely effective this would be, but adding unguided rockets to the EF-24 would be pretty interesting. Sure the F-14 carried it and in all honesty I just want to have that option because the F-14 had it, but having unguided rockets would be fun to use because it gives the EF-24 another option to destroy targets when being GPS jammed
#Extra EF-24 weaponry
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
just a bit of CAS weapons would be great
beyond gbu-12s
still not rifles, just something to help a bit
Maybe something along the lines of an AGM-130?
Reposting a video from vtolvrchat below:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1kW2qFaYIgs
a rocket propelled, guided bomb with a possibly steerable seeker on its terminal phase?
This could be pretty neat
As for the other point about Hydras, I think I'll stick with saying no, since Baha himself has stated that he would not be adding those
#1261320731883474975 message
I think adding TV guided bombs would be interesting for the WSO/EWO to control
what about an updated AIM-7; such as the AIM-7P block II or AIM-7R.
That’s kinda how the one we have is already. It can reaqcuire from radar source of launching aircraft
I’m a huge sparrow defender, I honestly wish we got a more modern texture for the one in-game as well as renaming it
would have sworn that it self detonates and stops guiding in if radar lock is lost. will test it later
the existing AIM-7 may be AIM-7P block I but not block II.
they only accept corrections from datalink if locked on to target
even on the ef-24
Baha himself has stated that the EF24 isn't getting mavericks or hydras or anything like that
:/
#1261320731883474975 message
true
The EF24 isn't really a frontline either, it's more of a backline
it's a support aircraft with how it does EW
(though we do use it as a frontline CAP aircraft in CAW mainly because it has such a busted radar and because of its speed)
its situational
frankly i feel lucky it has bombs at all, aha could have just taken inspiration from air to air tomcat and EA-18G
off course the real tomcats did eventually get bombs but i hope i’m clear
could have just been AAMs and HARM
and gun
I believe this is the correct behavior, command datalinks in missiles (outside of something like the 120D) use radar encoding anyways so im pretty confident a stt needs to be maintained on the target, additionally the actual benefits of the datalink are in situations where the sarh seeker cannot see the illuminated target. This cannot happen in vtol as the missile seeker will always see the target if its in its fov
F14 did carry rockets, the ZUNI's to be specific
On the frontcenter 2 pylons and the lower wint pylons
Aka 3 under the fuselage, 2 under each wing
they were definitely tested but as far as I’ve seen they were never operationally used
but the ef24 isn’t the f14, just modeled after it. so really, baha could give the ef24 a giant railcannon, ace combat-style, if he wanted
no the 'cat got service rockets, they were used in Desert Storm
Zuni rockets were first mounted and used by cpt dale snodgrass and cdr john snedeker of VF-14 were the first to carry it (at an unknown time)
The first combat application was in 1995, 4 years after desert storm ended
info taken from the “naval aviation news” jan-feb 1995 issue
And snodgrass (certified badass, designated as the real life maverick with more flight hours and carrier traps than any other pilot) was the CO of VF-33 during desert storm
Have you considered paveways or dumb bombing? 24 can carry 12 mk 83... If you miss with all that freedom you can sign up for the Russian air force
f-14's were A/G capable from the start, just never used. LANTIRN got implemented later in its lifespan, but it was always capable of dumb weapons
yeah i know. but my point is more of the EA-18G
based on the very much multirole F/A-18F but only has HARM variants and AIM-120 (and AIM-9X as of recent)
the 24 could have been similar
thankfully not
u sure it isnt capable in delivering other A/G weapons? its based on the F/A-18 as u said. i have a faint memory of it being able to, but dont know from where......
i mean i’m sure it would be quite easy for them to add, the pylons are there, and the avionics too probably
but i don’t think so, worth checking
feels weird for them not being able to, even as a back-up in the fleet (i.e. when no(t enough) F/A-18's are available)
AGM-154 JSOW is the only other i could find
well frankly i think it’s a doctrine thing
you don’t want people tasking growlers to strike missions
because the crews aren’t well trained for it
and the airframes are limited and highly valuable
you want to make sure the growler pilots stay safe and support the strikers. with HARM and jamming
the AIM-120 is for self defense only
same reason you don’t give amraam to the B-1, even tho it has an air to air radar
inst that a terain following radar?