#Canopy Jettison Lever
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
If that’s true, why do irl planes have it?
Why do we need it in game?
:/
I feel like "Just because" isn't good enough of a reason for this here.
Same
Why have this when we already have the ejection handle?
So, let’s think about this. Irl jets have this, which means that it servers a purpose. Is that not a good enough reasoning that maybe it could have a purpose in VTOL too?
the purpose is to get the canopy off before ejection
so you don't die like goose
in VTOL that doesn't exactly happen
So I don’t see why this is a bad addition?
it's not bad, it's just not usefull
I get that it isn’t an issue in VTOL, but it serves as a tool for greater immersion
fair enough, just don't go on to ask for an oxygen system switch. We would make fun of you
If you give aircraft in VTOL the bare minimum equipment that they need in order to operate, then the experience wouldn’t be as immersive. I like having the extra bells and whistles that irl aircraft have because it makes me feel more immersed, even if they don’t always prove to be the most useful if at all.
so would you like to protend to align your ILS ?
I agree. However, I think an O2 hose from the mask would be cool
actually yeah
I think that it should be an option in the mission editor to make aircraft start with/without ILS alignment. Meaning, aircraft could either start already aligned, or have to manually align the aircraft during startup
Which would take like an extra 30 secs because it’s VTOL
okay, to be honest with you, altho i'm the kind of player that can and would learn all this stuff. I like that VTOL is aproachable by the average person
I agree
there is no useless button or duplicate weapons
appart from a few cases i guess
I like that it's not DCS i guess
I also agree. By default, ILS alignment would already be aligned. But if the mission editor wanted to make aircraft align manually, then that option would have to be changed
But that is a stretch
I am not advocating for ILS alignment
But if that is something that Baha wants to do, those are my ideas for it
do you mean INS
and i think the reason people argue against posts like these that dont REALLY improve the game to any large degree is that the game is developed by one person, and people want other changes that actually do directly improve the game, rather than small things like this
Only way I could see this being added is if Baha added system failures and the ejection system failed
Correct. Thank you
Excellent idea
Nvm I already made it a feature request
Which don’t get me wrong, that’s a fantastic idea, I’d love low chances for simulated failures
It would make things more interesting tbh
i cant wait to stall and my canopy fails to jettison when i pull my eject
oorah
I mean for this to be useful we’d have to introduce easier ways to flatspin like compressor stalling
Yes, but our top scientists at Baha blast inq have come up with a more efficient method; by removing the safety lock that prevents you from opening the canopy you can eject the canopy with a flip of a familiar switch, with a delay before just in case you change your mind
^
i have tried to initiate a spin in VTOL and it wont do it
with master flight assist off?
pretty sure that would change something
oh yeah they were probably on
Excellent point. I guess what I was going for was for the immersion factor. But I realize that this addition wouldn’t actually add anything truly useful to the game, when there are better additions available. Thank you
Idk what I do but low speeds in the 45 I’ll be pulling and flat spin myself
Then again, it doesn’t take long to Recover
Bank off the catapult in a 26
Only time I've experienced a flight departure that wasn't because of damage