#Slightly enhance Rule 1
545 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Exhibit A: <#engine-dev message>
This was blamed to be a rule 8 enforcement failure, while I believe this to be a rule 1 enforcement failure
in what way?
are you asking in what way this is a rule 1 enforcement failure?
ye mb
rule 1 says "be nice and respectful"
most discord servers extend that to "no racism/sexism/etc"
it is clear that the dude was being incredibly sexist and misogynist
just look at the link I posted
"Women should belong to the kitchen"
"Eh well they don't hate women they just express things different
"
that's ridiculously disrespectful
"Women should belong to the kitchen"
what where did he write that lol
I didn't see that either
"Eh well they don't hate women they just express things different
"
I think he referred to them using outdated offensive language
in germany the n word was literally used in product names up until like 2013 ish?
so my grandparents just use it sometimes still cause its still normal to them
maybe an extreme example looool

to put this diplomatically, there's definitely a bit of culture shock when you join this server because a good few people here seem like they've only ever hung out with upper middle class urban types, perhaps even techie types
as it turns out I'm dumb and stupid and that was pixel making a (bad) joke 
and usually the people (like this guy) that react the strongest, are exactly the opposite
I remember another guy a while back who seemed particularly rural and not about the life
but still, just by saying "they (jblow & friends) don't hate women" is clearly telling of their character
that they have a difference of opinion to you?
hating women is not an "difference of opinion"
you should seriously think about this
He didn't really say he hated women did he
i think how we talk is very harsh but we kinda all know each other internet wise so its fine.
but outsiders get killed
I think what he meant was simply that what's (in some circles) considered sexist today wasn't before...case in point, the Jblow tweet that was brought up
im also guilty of that sometimes i think
I mean I've never seen any of you make any bad remarks
yeah I mean it's noticeable sometimes that beyond the insider-ness there's a lot of people among the regulars who have let's just say a narrow view of the world
i mean i am rude sometimes, not that i use a fork to get my gf to cook for me
so you're all good 
I have been guilty of this too yes
It's ok to kill people over being a 14 year old trying to learn OpenGL but not when someone has a different background from you
we're not perfect, but there's a difference to "being rude to a vampire beginner asking for help with homework" and straight up being a misogynist 
I am personally fine with people being harsh when it comes to on topic stuff, yeah
but part of why rule 8 exists is because you should be mindful of what iceberg you're crashing into
even if you think you're past the tip
imo from what i read thats a far projection. You can have some regressive views without beeing a misogynist straight up.
The beauty of rule 8 is being able to just shut down political conversation without enforcing any "correct" political opinion that just causes divisiveness
I'm gonna be straight up, I researched this because I never heard of Jblow being sexist, I don't even like the guy particularly but all I found was a tweet where he said that women on average have less interest in tech....if that is considered sexist now then I have to agree with neutrino
That is called statistics
maybe that's true, maybe it isn't
still sexism should still be included in rule 1
sexism is just as bad as misogyny
Programming is traditionally a woman's job lol I think the whole discussion was kinda dumb but that's beside the point about rule 8 enforcement
it's not even sexism it's like the indirect discussion of the theoretical capacity for some other guy to be sexist
.
no that's wrong
he said "women are biologically less interested in tech"
And?
which is, shocking I know, very sexist
and?
bro
How is that sexist
????
I mean it's just an observation
it's a retarded observation
one that is spread purposefully to keep women from tech jobs
i dont think thats sexist thats just a thing you can say. It doesnt degrade woman in any way.
Being interested in tech doesn't make you a better person
???
have y'all ever heard of this magical thing called the patriarchy?
if no racism/sexism/homophobia/transphobia is not assumed as the default correct political opinion this server is not very welcoming is it
like men are also less intrested in biology generally in sciences than woman
Theres probably more women interested in graphic design than men
idk how to put this any more diplomatically
More egalitarian societies than ours still has that gap but either way this is going in the completely wrong direction
no clue of thats biological or whatever but that doesnt matter, does it?
The point is that rule 8 is good
I'm not asking to change rule 8
like, at this point you need to consider how your statements could inflame rule 8
I'm asking to enhance rule 1
just define rule 1 better
include racism/sexism/homophobia/transphobia in rule 1 and we're golden
that way when someone is sexist we can just mute him on the spot
it's an observation that stems from the fact that women have been pushed out of tech, and which leads to women being pushed out of tech 🙃
thank you
a big failing with every major rule 8 snafu is when people don't realize they're trying to make political statements because they're too narrow minded
finally a sane person
is that the only thing he said?
and when they're too narrow minded in a way you don't agree with it's obvious
then i dont think hes sexist at all
idk any other things, I don't follow jblow
read what potato said
but you should not avail yourself of when you're saying things that are inflamatory to the conversation or everyone else
especially if you notice how everyone is a little confused at your take on the matter
the women are biologically less/more X are common misogynist arguments used to push women out of spaces
biology doesn't control what you're interested in
im pretty sure its just some half assed remark with him having no strong opinion on it
Yes the issue is like 5 minutes of back and forth arguing where the mods and their political bias butt heads with other person with their political bias and only once that person is deemed to be pushing the limits is rule 8 invoked
It's very subjective
you should disregard all that
does that mean we should ignore influential people who do this garbage potentially hurting other people in the process???
and think about how the mere fact you're having a back and forth about it might mean that it's A) not as clear cut as you want to claim and B) therefore, definitionally, controversial
and therfore rule 8
or should we call this shit out in hopes of creating a better community inclusive of everyone?
you should think about this
Rule 8 Arena 2 electric boogaloo in progress 😍
I believe you're just not seeing what I'm seeing
There is no arguing this
no I get your point, I understand what you're getting at
The most inclusive community is one where political discourse is shut down by invoking rule 8 rather than making value judgements about people's beliefs, no matter what they are
condemming him on a single expression that might not even be thought through or anything is not good either
but let me drop the bombshell, it is just a political opinion
but my argument is that this should fall under rule 1
QED
no
loool
I am telling you rule 1 takes priority over rule 8
Lvstri you are like the mirror image of jebrim lol
yeah literally
if you can't be nice and respectful then get the fuck out of here
poor guy
the bare minimum expectation from social interactions shouldn't be relegated to just 'ha politics'
you don't wanna be the anti-jebrim
hahahahaha
are you comparing my argument to that of a literally insane person?
we should put them together and see if they annihilate each other
ok pause for a moment
He's not insane he's just obstinate lol
hold on a second
he's so narrow minded it forms a line
Wait we have to get the frogcorn emoji added first
is this an issue where you believe rule 8 should have priority over rule 1?
its 3 am and im here 👴 omg i will die
its 2 am and i am going to death too
its ok I am trying to clean this up
the point fundamentally is that the only reason this was incensed is because there was a dispute in a public, on topic discord channel about a difference of opinion on politics
you are calling someone who wants inclusivity in the rules narrow minded
wtf
that's not trying to clean it up
that's making it worse
both you and the offending party clearly don't wanna compromise on wanting to discuss politics unilaterally until you win the argument
hence why rule 8 exists
Rule 1: respect people
Rule 8: no politics
When someone says something rude about someone else (e.g. says something homophobic) you say "that's not respectful, rule 1." When someone argues about it you say "rule 8". You don't need to insert specific protected classes or anything
you can't just lawyer other stuff to take precedence to win arguments when the point of rule 8 is to prevent such a contentious scenario from existing
If someone is being disrespectful they are breaking rule 1 period
it's missing the forest for the trees
ah yes my political opinions are correct ofc ofc so only use rule 8 on others!
I feel like I'm going insane
same
how is this acceptable?
like bro what
"my political opinions are different from yours therefore I am allowed to hate women"
the simple fact of the matter is that you are knee deep in a political argument with someone who isn't even here and you don't even know it
and this situation was preventable
yes, by enforcing rule 1 early
massive hyperbole. This didnt even come up here
Nobody said he's allowed to express his hatred for women the point is that everyone dogpiling him shouldn't have been arguing politics back at him only to slap him with rule 8 and nobody else gets in trouble
You are trying to read the hate part between the lines but to many of us it is simply not there, observations about preferences of women is not hating women
yeah beyond the fact that at this point it's strawmanning a guy, who, isn't even here
john blow and the nero guy dont hate woman i believe. From all i read here and watched john blow.
he's gone with the wind
listen
you're talking about one guy's opinion on another guy, none of them we know personally
you all have eyes and can read english
but you need to win your argument with him
exactly
do you not see how this is the snowball effect of a situation caused directly by talking politics
The content of that specific incident is almost irrelevant
It's the mechanics of how it snowballs that matters
when I see someone agreeing with the misogynist rhetoric "women are biologically less interested in tech" (which is used all the time by misogynists there's no hiding it) I am going to say that this person is not being very respectful
but why are you taking this and running with it
I'm not
you are overprojecting this case massively
I want to make rule 1 explicit so that this very situation is avoided in the future
Whether or not that's misogynistic is a subjective and politicized opinion so I'm invoking rule 8
that's the most stupid thing I've ever heard today
I would hate to invoke anything implying majority here but listen if only one of us in the room is hearing the voices
they might be in your head
this discussion is pointless
it makes me want to mash my head against the wall
I'll leave the thread up to the mods to decide whether to enhance rule 1 or not
y'all need to reflect on yourselves lol
not autistic enough tbh
not yet
because of exactly these things rule 8 should have been enforced to begin with before the incident happened and he left imo
https://play.runescape.com/
this is a perfectly good moment to throw your life away
explicitly saying no sexism/racism/etc isn't allowed would probably have made them leave a lot earlier lol
or atleast be a lot more careful when speaking
I hope you're all joking but if you aren't then idk what to say
I was mostly teasing but there is a kernel of truth in it
he left because others were rude to him
there is not a single hair of truth in this
I hate to break it to you
wanting inclusivity should not be considered controversial or political
im sure he has no problem with that at all
if you do consider it controversial or political then I will call you stupid and I will consider you subhuman
he didnt even say anything sexist/racist at all.
Jebrim from the mirror world: [insert controversial opinion] should not be considered controversial
yeah but it's a lot easier instaban when he blatantly ignores such an explicit rule 
yeah, the only difference is that he was insane
small difference
if inclusivity is controversial to you, frankly, what the fuck dude
More specifically he left because the argument got hairy in both directions but only he got in trouble for it because of the side he was on
plus this is a true statement, no matter what
controversy is not a subjective thing, it means that people argue about it
you can't just ignore it when people argue about stuff
yes you can
yes
there's a very cool button called "ban"

that's literally the reason why rule 8 exists though, it's proving the point more and more
it works 100% of the times
it didn't work clearly 
I don't think we should consider anyone subhuman 
Because the mods involved are biased themselves and didn't have the foresight to see where it was going
exactly why an explicit rule 1 would help?
yes and I'm telling you
lol
the mods also (to their credit, don't get me wrong) are careful to watch a situation play out before making a hasty and misguided judgement
that enhancing rule 1 would fix this
literally please
go read the top of this post
what I'm asking for
"mods are biased so we should enhance rule 1 and avoid invoking rule 8 in ambiguous situations"
it's that simple
No rule 8 was the perfect solution to that problem
yeah and literally its loosening has consistently caused issues, see this case
It should have been used as soon as the jblow discussion became about politics instead of coding
jesus
Tbh I am partly to blame (rule 8 Arena)
it should have been shut as soon as it was mentioned john would be sexist. There is no point in discussing that at all in a gp server
Especially in engine dev lol
let's play a little hypothetical scenario, let's say this guy was instantly banned... the aftershocks of the convo are still going
why does #engine-dev attract such random-ass discussions
so clearly the problem lies elsewhere
you should be able to call someone sexist (with evidence) without consequences
Why lol
but yes that was a bit over the top for #engine-dev
its where people go that lost most of their neurons already
What if you're wrong
that I agree with
I should be able to call someone a
without consequences
I'm clearly not
yes
no?
That's your opinion
There's nothing objective about any of these things it's not something you can do an experiment to prove quantitatively lol
also you formed your opinion about a guy who A) is not here and can't defend himself and B) formed an opinion on another guy, indirectly, for reasons not elaborated
what kind of crazy game of telephone is that
a guy that guy A doesn't know personally
just go on andrew tate's channel and watch him say the exact same words
"women are not biologically suited for X"
bro wtf
Lmao what
thats not what was said at all
guy A is sexist because guy C said something guy B might have said
ok idk what to tell you
Also comparing andrew Tate to jblow is 
I'm not doing that
"Are not biologically suited" and "less interested to on average" are like...worlds apart
I'm saying that the argument jblow used was very clearly used in misogynistic contexts
That's not even the claim that was made
I'm not saying omg jblow is literally andrew tate
I checked this out
you are wrong
this whole thread is bait tbh
he said they're less biologically interested
no it's not
it was a very simple request
the more bait it is the more it proves the point with rule 8
I'm biologically joe
again it was a very simple request
not since the layoff
That doesn't bring it any closer to "not suited"
tomato potato
no
Not at all lol
its not even close
not in the slightest
yeah I'll remark again that this discussion is pointless
Men are statically unlikely to want to wear a dress but I don't think you'd argue that that means they should be forbidden from
TL;DR for the mods, please just add "no racism/sexism/homophobia/transphobia" to rule 1
it almost feels like I'm a broken record here but if it's possible to dig ad infinitum on this issue when all offending parties are long gone, and rule 1 in its most extreme couldn't even apply, the problem is clearly elsewhere
yeah sure whatever you want
this doesnt fix the issue
just add the inclusivity to the rule for peace of mind
like demon said. its about how the existing rules are enforced
who cares what rules include what specifically
everyone knows what is meant already
yeah and that's not even to mention, completely unrelated to any of this, rules lawyering is like a harbinger of the fall
usually it comes from the mods though
ok then I'll add another request to the thread (just mute them immediately, for like 1 hr)
to restore order
as much fun as it is in tiny doses the rule8shedding has started to get tiresome
it has
speaking candidly I would like lvstri to stop inflaming it further
mainly because you all consider basic decency politics
I would like you to stop considering basic decency politics
regardless of whether it's subjective or not
We already have a rule that says be decent to one another
Making a list of which specific groups of people are explicitly worthy of respect is forbidden by rule 8
being decent also involves calming down and accepting that some peopel share a difference of opinion, and as shocking as it might be in [current year]
at one point in the long forgotten past people had the social maturity to avoid politics so they could talk about sometihng that wasn't politics without bringing the columns crashing down
not when you're insulting half the population, no 
such 3am statements dont help either. If you really think that you have poor reading comprehension honestly.
regardless of whether they whole heartedly believed their cause was everything and anything
Darn I gotta drive home don't delete the thread until I have time to catch up
yeah its clearly inflamatory, it's either 200IQ, artisanally crafted bait but related to this point above, keep the columns as they are
don't pull the columns down over literally nothing
eh you still think it's bait lol
I don't care if it's bait, it's damaging to the quality of the server no matter what it is
you heard it here ladies and gentlemen
asking for inclusivity is damaging to the server
the guy seemed to be a rendering veteran maybe from what i read. And that he left for this is dumb imo. He could have helped people.
you dont do that at all
oh right my bad
you just insinuate people are bad cause of projected opinions that they dont hold
there is inclusivity here by default, if you wanna deal with social problems you gotta be able to handle social situations
yes I don't include sexist people and misogynist people
how could I
I am truly heartless
yea you call someone sexist that isnt and then its ok to hate on them
I'm just saying I know a guy who couldn't grind his social skills to level 99 in runescape
and would react the same way...
genuine question, what are you trying to accomplish
yes I'm literally anti jebrim
haha funny
laugh everyone
it's exactly the same
I didn't mean the new guy
no he's saying I am jebrim
truly
I don't know why he's doing this
maybe to get a reaction out of me idk 
jeb literally engulfed himself in whatever shit he thought was important without being able to step off the ledge and calm down to the point he was banned dazed and confused
For the mods, here's a pin to the top
Am I being unreasonable? I don't think so, but at least 4 people think I am
read the conversation if you dare
reading it may give you eye cancer however
tbh don't read it even if you really think you can
I will just go sleep
lvstri has so much power he could become a locomotive if he doesnt wanna program anymore
it's the end of the day, I can afford to waste some time on pointless discussions
I have nothing planned to do tomorrow anyway 
this can only result in a hardcore political take guessing from the name 
People obviously disagree on what constitutes sexism....therefore moderating that rule would be problematic
it's ok I have officially stopped, the locomotive came to a halt
guys named the demongod and twoheaded fetus coming in to make the most neutral take ever
lmao
as the italians say: true and real
(my whole image of italy is shaped based of lvstri) that country must produce an absurd amount of rendering code based on population
we did invent nanite
skypjack, the entt guy, is also italian
I have also spoken with the original paper author
thats a death scentence
yes
pastalavista
you want a cut of my counterfeit parmesan operation?
ah yes
it's made 5 miles out of parma (highly illegal)
ultimately everything is politics, letting discount bin tate takes in without moderating them is politics, and enforcing a no-discrimination rule is also politics
i'd rather see the latter
We already have a no discrimination rule it's rule 1
you're avoiding the enforcement discussion this thread asks
I'm not I just disagree with it
In isolation as well as its relationship to the event this morning that triggered it
i'm speaking in support of this enhancement and lvs's position
the harm to being told to please remove your edgy jblow post is far less than the destructive potential to would be members of the community we turn away by allowing this sort of remark
Nobody posted jblow
someone got bullied off the server for saying jblow is an alright guy
the power of association is strong
but this isn't a proposal about allowing this sort of bullying
consider that even in the post charitable view, blow is a corrosive character who made a point to be polarising
sure, what about it
Imo this discussion above about this specific case show that making rules like this more precise will do nothing.
The subjective wiggle room is too large to interpret it
what part of no sexism is ambiguous
I will fly to germany and you will look me in the eyes and say "yes this is sexist"
ye I wasn't gonna pester anymore anyway
I just wanted to share the actual evidence of jblow being a literal misogynist 
its literally the same thing we talked about the whole time
like the exact same, there is nothing new in these tweets
That is literally not evidence
"Interest is not the same as ability" = it doesn't matter if 30% less women are interested in tech than men, it doesn't speak anything on the ability of those that are
Biological factors = duh, do you think there is nothing biological about interest?
wow I sure wish there was a rule whereby such discussions would be cut before they degenerated

truly, talking about women's biological interests is peak GP
Yeah, it's ultimately not something that needs to be discussed, but I'm just saying why banning people for saying it makes no sense
it is insane to even think there is biology in interest
truly women cannot be programmers indeed
anywhoo I agree that the original discussion should've just been stopped before it degenerated
but IMO it's more a moderation mistake than any issue with the rules
clep did you read the top of the post btw
yea
do you think I am unreasonable for stating that being nice and respectful should take priority to political/controversial opinion
if your political opinion is misogyny then you should be banned period
that's literally all I'm asking for
Why do you keep making up the "women can't be programmers" part, nothing about that statement implies it, it doesn't matter if less women are interested, those that are interested can definitely be programmers, he even said that with "Interest is not the same as ability"
my personal opinion is that any and all talk around that stuff should be stopped before it degenerates, in this instance the second someone said something about sexism it should've gone to the politics symposium, aka been stopped
otherwise yes it's the mods essentially taking a stance
ok
I disagree but that's ok
just don't be an ass (I say this to the guy who left)
yes
sry wait unclear
incredible
anyways yes the guy should've basically not gotten so triggered over mister blow getting called a bastard man
anywho I thought that pat's remark about jblow being sexist (an objectively true statement, no matter your political stance) was fine, but yes I agree that that message was the catalyst
yea it should've just been stopped at that point
anywhoo there'll always be some form of bias in moderation sadly
especially when only a subset of moderators are around
for example, me moderating in offtopic will tell u I gave ur mom gonorrhea, while dragon moderating in offtopic will behave like a normal, polite human being
(btw tell her I'm sorry)
(she can call me any time)
nice nice nice
glad to hear
but yea
rule 1 is a bit ambiguous I guess
it used to not be
idk why we changed it
I think we just felt like it was self explanatory that no bigotry was allowed
that being said "no bigotry" wouldn't really have covered the discussion we're talking about rn
since it started with politics
ehh that guy was pretty adamant
I believe he just wanted us to agree to his retarded opinion
kekw
anywhoo
I think things are fine the way they are but I am biased since I'm part of the people who made things the way they are
do not speak the forbidden lore
I have nothing of value to add. But, if it makes everyone feel better, Jblow is going broke
quotes from the person in question:
"Im not discrediting what you are saying, you are completely welcome to your opinion"
"People can have different opinions from you and not be 'aholes' or whatever"
"I don't think arguing the merits of the whole <subject in question> thing is a good discussion though"
look
I think I made myself pretty clear
"women are X" is not an opinion
you can think and believe it's an opinion
it isn't
if you think it is you are definitely, positively, 100% confirmed, an asshole
that's all
Wat, that's not what I was responding to
I know I was responding to the "People can have different opinions from you and not be 'aholes' or whatever"
the rest is mostly fine, though I still think he was too far gone, given his other statements
#engine-dev message
look at this shit 
ah yes he was clearly joking
whatever this is pointless as he left
so it doesn't matter
I mean he is serious about believing his viewpoint but he is obviously teasing about opinions being wrong
But yes cleppi has spoken so I agree there is no more to say
Maybe that guy will come back and we can have rule 8 Arena 3
sure, I'm up for pointless discussions
though I will still repeat, forever that this is not politics, not in the slightest
only the pieces of shit think this is political
just because you have pieces of human garbage spouting political garbage and using women's rights as political weapons doesn't mean we have to play by their rules
I like to think that our community is above that
i hope it is
how can we be above it if we can't even agree which way is up
Suggestion: roles for political orientation (spin up and spin down)
the spin is an interesting idea for a role
maybe add another one for "what kind of fermion are you"
Then we can have a new completely arbitrary and meaningless political boundary to argue about rather than arguing about boring real world politics
do you break your spaghetti or no
Thanks to Fetch Rewards for sponsoring today's video! Download the Fetch Rewards app now: https://fetch.thld.co/ragusea_0422 and use code RAGUSEA to get 3,000 points on your first receipt!
RECIPE, SERVES TWO
10 oz (283g) fresh grape or cherry tomatoes
1/2 lb (227g) dry spaghetti (ideally NOT bronze-cut)
2 jalapeños (or other large, mild ...
oh no did you lose all your braincells too reading it
amirite

reading this thread removed more braincells from my head than the opengl spec has so far
all messages past that gif are giving strong "this can't stop me because I can't read" vibes and that's really funny 
but ye I am extremely sad that something as simple as this suggestion sparked so much discussion
should've been a quick and easy fix and yet
no more messages though
(fr this time)
discord needs a "close thread" button
