#ADD TUTEL TANK
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

Should have one Super Heavy tank per side then for balancing. I came up with this;
USA: "Tutel" T28 Super Heavy Tank
Germany: Panzer VIII "Maus"
USSR: T-35 (they dont seem to have any Super Heavy's, but this bad boy has multiple cannons instead)
Britain: TOG II
Terrible idea the t35 can't compete and the maus is barely real. The is3 would be more accurate if we are using such tanks
Its cool but I dont think it would be fun because of the Spead and how easy infantrie can kill you.
No.
Germany has a tiger 2
Soviet Union has an IS-2
And USA has a Pershing
Everyones responding to me but this wasnt my idea 😪 i was just saying if youre gonna recommend it for one faction you should for every faction for balancing. I think the tanks we have now are fine, maybe a Panzer 38t because its a very fun light tank
Never used, has no place in the game
just a idea maybe it gets aproved yk
No.
Play warthunder then
Yeah I’d rather see them pick from the king list of actual tanks used in these battles than this prototype tank
no
World of Tanks maybe?
How about we just make the p1000 work and call it a day. (This is sarcasm)
😌 Ah yes let's add tanks that barely existed outside of paper to a game focused on somewhat realistically simulating ww2.
I don't mean to try and mock you but this is a ridiculous suggestion. The first T28 prototypes were constructed in 1945, I couldn't find the exact month from my lazy Wikipedia search. The maus on the other hand suffers from the exact same problem with never entering service and only 2 ever being built. (One without a turret). Tanks like these have no place in Hell Let Loose in my opinion. Like Walter said we might as well just add the P1000. Tanks like the Stugs, Jagdpanthers, M10, Super Pershing, Churchill tanks, etc. are all more deserving to be added than a prototype tanks. (Besides both are massive tanks and would struggle in the current map environment) Maybe one day in the far future moding will make it's debut and then I'd happily serve you up a T28 or Maus tank.
"I dont mean to try and mock"
proceeds to mock before saying i don't mean to try and mock
I completely understand what youre getting at, but yeah, you aint slick lol
maybe I should've phrased it as so: "I don't mean to try and mock but it is such a ridiculous proposal I can't but help myself"
Give give give
T28 is very cool it also never saw any combat
🤮 👎
Your sagacious feedback manifests profound utility in illuminating the value imbued within each proposition presented.
They gotta add t55
And you're trying to use more sophisticated words to sound smarter than you really are
The only way I could see the T95 be added would be as an easter egg prop similar to the P1000
Maybe just throw some destroyed ones out in a field or something, let people use it as cover 😂
I mean the only T28 that’s left was found in a farmer’s field covered in bushes and vines
Got my support 
How would that make sense 💀
What do you mean? You been reading the past few messages about this?
Solaire said above me "i could see the T95 be added would be as an easter egg prop"
And i said "throw some destroyed ones [T95s] out in a field... let people use it as cover"
What dont you understand?
T28, they’re officially T28s
that makes hard for brits as their centurion never participated in battle
but then if we count the centurion we have to count the Is-3 which is also built before war ends but never participate battle
Nothing with a T designation should ever be added to the US faction
Made yes but T stands for Test the only ones that are used were T26E3 and T26E4 which got actual designations after a month
Yes but they all got actual designations if they were used in US Service.
T9E1 and T9 Became M22 at Production
T12 became M3 GMC at Production
T17 never became a Standard US vehicle so the designation did not change
T19 never became standard and served with 1 or 2 units it stayed T19 due to being a stopgap
T24 was changed to M24 at Production
T26E3 became M26 after 1 month of combat due to them being “field tested” for January and February.
T26E4-1 is the only one that stayed T because it was the only one issued in the ETO and was still experimental and a test vehicle
Any vehicle that was used in any comparable way didn’t keep the T designation, adding something with that designation is either a very small number, not issued, a failed Design, or a physical small period of time as a field test vehicle
I appreciate your perspective, but I assure you that my intention was not to appear smarter than I am. I simply wanted to express my sincere gratitude for your insightful feedback, as it truly helps shed light on the inherent value of the ideas presented. It's important to foster an environment where we can engage in thoughtful discussions and encourage each other's growth. I believe utilizing a diverse range of vocabulary enriches our language and enhances our ability to articulate ideas. Let's focus on the substance of the conversation and continue sharing valuable insights.
In germany we would say you are "abgehoben".
Thank you for sharing your perspective. It's interesting to consider cultural differences in expressions and interpretations. While I understand that my use of sophisticated language may have come across as lofty or disconnected, please know that it was not my intention. I believe that effective communication requires finding a balance between clarity and eloquence. I appreciate your feedback and will strive to ensure that my words resonate with others in a more relatable and accessible manner. Let's continue the conversation with mutual understanding and respect for our diverse perspectives. Aber Danke Diggah :)
I ought to hire you to write my essays. You can definitely hit that word count
