Tank Destroyers

[patent rapids]

Not needed as of recent updates, but in the future I wish to see these in a later update.

United States:
-M10 Wolverine (Early-Late Tank Destroyer)
-M18 Hellcat (Mid-Late Tank Destroyer)
-M36 Jackson (Late Tank Destroyer)

USSR:
-SU-12 (Mid-Late Tank Destroyer)
-SU-85 (Mid-Late Tank Destroyer)
 
United Kingdom:
-Achilles (Mid-Late Tank Destroyer)
-Archer (Mid-Late Tank Destroyer)```

```AXIS:
Germany:
-StuG III (Early-Late Tank Destroyer) 
-Jagdpanzer IV (Mid-Late Tank Destroyer)
-Jagdpanther (Late Tank Destroyer)

Finland:
-StuG III (Early-Late Tank Destroyer) 
-BT-42 (Mid-Late Tank Destroyer)```

[ruby plinth]

StuG my beloved ❤️

[bold lark]

Jagdpanther overrated, where my marders at

[patent rapids]

Would die from an MG burst when flanked from behind

[vast cradle]

What about a dicker max then they have a few variants with closed over tops

[earnest spire]

Is this turning into War Thunder?

[vast cradle]

Why not its cool to have some janky TD with paper armour and big guns

[dense sail]

You know they only made two of them, right? They never left the prototype stage, one caught fire immediately so there was only one that actually went to the front

[opal echo]

@patent rapids and the Ferdinand in 1943

[patent rapids]

bro did NOT do his research 🗣️🗣️🗣️🔥🔥

[vast cradle]

So what its a game its suppose to be fun comrade something you havent had in ages you grump, they literally didnt make many jumbos (1% of total m4s) either and its in the "GAME" thats right boys its a game not real life ooOoOooo i upset the sweaty ww2 community get real. Oh btw puffer fish all the US tanks TD you posted are open tops a single nade would take them out. isn't it fun poking holes in stuff must have not have done your research, bunch of ww2 babies 🍼

[dense sail]

Jumbos should also be removed, that’s something i’ve been saying for ages, for exactly that reason

[opal echo]

I hate the jumbo 76mm, Because it offers no variety to the American, and are gameplay is to be a big wall that shades the jumbo 75mm

[wicked bison]

The jumbos would have a place, if they would fix the armor on it but they probably never will

[hushed falcon]

Question: would the BT-42 get both HE and HEAT?

[normal valley]

Nah bro we need a sturmtiger

[vast crystal]

Jumbos dont break immersion as much as they could in theory due to them looking exactly like shermans.

[wicked bison]

They break immersion more in function than anything, same with the basic M4A3 75 (W)

[dense sail]

Doesn't matter, they should only appear on Ardennes and offensive into Germany maps if they are to be in the game at all, and even then only rarely

[vast crystal]

eh its just splitting hairs IMO. As far as im concerned things only need to be split by time period and maybe front. Beyond that it becomes a convoluted nightmare of balancing up to 10 different faction variants that most players cant keep track of and only improves immersion for a few. Same with the whole "Tigers on US normandy maps" thing.
Definitley should be rarer though since it seems like normal shermans just dont show up.

[wicked bison]

The Jumbo would be on all maps besides Normandy, which is a reason the US heavies should switch to large hatch Shermans and the Jumbo become a unique infantry support tank, the Churchill as well. Both have near impenetrable frontal armor with the Jumbo being immune to both the KwK 42 and KwK 36 of the Panther and Tiger 1, and the Churchill needing maybe some additional track armor to make it believable adding a single track takes the stand-off distance down to 300m

[cunning bloom]

Thn we will need open top mechanic
Like throwing grenade into m8 and destroing it from inside (thats just example)

[opal echo]

He and already in the game, throws a grenade into a halftrack which are open vehicles, His kills the whole team that will be inside

[vast cradle]

Its alittle more complicated then that its easy for me and you to talk about it. But for a coder to make that happen is a completely different thing

[patent rapids]

Good time to bring this back?

[agile sand]

I suppose, since they mentioned wanting to do tank destroyers in the dev brief a few weeks ago