#new-recruit-barracks
1 messages Ā· Page 83 of 1
The T34s gun is near useless
but the Panzer 4s mobility rn is horrid
Unless you mean IRL
A Pz IV doesn't bounce shit off its armor in this game
that's why: T-34/85 when 
yes but i'm talking one on one in the fields of kursk will it be made that the 122 can do multi modular damage or something like thar
T-34/85 for Berlin would be awesome
I'm sure an IS-2s 122 will shatter most tanks it hits
yeah true
like the test on the panthers
though I do wonder if they have it all thought out
they want to do the "super heavies" in the future
and add the commonwealth/British
dear god
heck if recons didn't need to start at the hqs at the start of the map that would be cool
like parashooting or somthing
as a heavy yeah (also Firefly is confirmed to come so that's probably going to be heavy, too simply because of the gun)
Recons would be fine if their speed was better
but they don't have "super heavies"
their current speeds are nearly 1/4th of what they actually are
It'll be interesting to see if they don't give the Firefly a hull MG
Yeah the british didn't really deploy super heavies
for all tanks actually
tortise
The Tortise didn't see pretty much any combat
I'm actually pretty sure it didn't see any combat in WW2
thats the first thing that comes to mind
1 sec
no it didn't i was just grasping at straws
I was thinking of the Cromwell for a medium tank
Yeah only 6 were built, and never went to combat
plus imagine that thing in africa
so light...
Valentine, medium Cromwell, maybe Comet
wait not light recon
fire fly for british medium
Valentine for Light
recon would be either Daimler or the Staghound
maybe crusdaer
stag i would say
Crusaders were North Africa only right?
i few went to russia but yep i think just africa
Was it the crusader that had no HE shells? I forget
I think it did
it was just a smaller tank
a 37mm or 57mm at max for variants
not very fast for a light
several Churchills
not very armored
I can't picture them putting a tank with no HE in the game and I know one of the ones they fielded in Africa didn't have any
including AVREs and Crocodiles
do u guys think that tank destroyers will be added?
Yes, they are planned
StuGs and SUs have been mentioned before
Stug III, M18, and Su-85, probably an Achilles for the British
StuG Life.
even though I'd personally love that
so i'm guessing stugs for germany su-85 then su-122 for russia and m18's for america
StuG would make my HLL experience complete
should be able to destroy emplacements like bunkers
open topped vehicles might actually still happen now that they are reworking skeletal meshes
so Wolverines
Jacksons etc for Americans
we shall see how much money and content Team17 will pump into HLL in the future
i want to start a patition for m22 to be the light tank for america
Open tops you'd have to sit so far back and then you still have to worry about recon grenading you
even if they wearn't used
from what I understand the main problem with open topped vehicles was technical issues
not gameplay issues
was or is
at least that's what Danny and/or Jambax said
plus they could have the planks of wood and stuff on top to stop that grenade thing
or make it less likly of getting in
Oh yeah its a technical thing I just mean if they do make it in now any dummy with a grenade or elevation can neutralize them
I'm not sure how tank destroyers would work in game with the current armor system, a heavy tank has infantry protection and can 1 shot anything below a heavy tank and can 2 shot a heavy tank, would a tank destroyer one shot heavy tanks? That would probably be a bit much, and if a TD costs near the cost of a heavy tank then why ever use it
I'm sure they could work out a logical system where everything has its place but that would probably be a pretty big change.
I think the focus should be on balancing what there is already so that fun can be maximised, rather than adding new stuff.
Im very interested in the flakpanzer and the whole anti-air systems being added to the game
I suppose its going to be shooting down air drops and what not but also could see it be used against infantry for the meme
so that will be interesting to balance
also what armor will it have? etc.
it'll always be used to shoot infantry, even if the gun depresses enough you could still sit in the right spots and shoot up at infantry
I think if they don't intend it to be used in a front line capacity they could probably balance that around how easily it is to penetrate from the front with rockets.
In regards to tanks I think a new class of 'super heavys' wouldnt hurt. I would suggest to make the new heavy tanks the Panther, jumbo 75, and IS-1. Super Heavys above them could be the Tiger-1 (and 2 eventually), Jumbo 76, and IS-2 or KV variant tank. This would allow the panther and 75 to have a purpose imo. Also allows you to add the tiger -2 down the road. In regards to resource balance Super heavys would be very rare but on purpose. Its a gamble for the teeam. Save up a ton and put a good crew in one super heavy or have a ton of lower classes like mediums.
I know the devs want to balance tank gameplay towards mediums more so
I absolutely adore tank gameplay in HLL and cant wait for more tanks and such, just trying to imagine the balance issues. Might be really dumb idea, im not a gameplay developer lol
I actually think super heavies would just be a win harder button.
eh, I mean they could still be destroyed from the side and rear with some strategic gameplay. Also if they cost so much and they get killed in 2 seconds then you are in a bad spot as a team. Really its a gamble and also an excuse to add more cool tanks to the game.
Got distracted at work, but what I mean by win harder is assuming they are really expensive, they're going to be hard to use unless you're not losing tanks and smashing their armor anyway.
But it really depends how easily they are to kill and by what, like if you can still just build an AT gun and shoot it in the front a few times.
I understand your concerns, its all a balancing act. I would think that mediums could kill super heavys with 3 in the side or 2 in the back, heavys with 2 in the side or 2 in the back. These are just spitball numbers, nothing concrete. As reguards to AT guns they are mega bugged in U11. They are not supposed to be able to penetrate everything like they can currently. They will be fixed soon i imagine.
Nah the penetration was noted in the change logs it was on purpose.
was it? I read the Tank Bible a couple days ago when it was updated and it says its a bug in there.
interesting
"Increased penetration power of AT-Guns allowing them to penetrate Heavy armour if angled correctly" was noted in the dev blog for U11's release, the dev blog a few weeks later said: "AT-Guns are able to destroy Heavy tanks with 2 shots to the hull" so allegedly the damage was the bug.
If I had to wildly speculate since this was demonstrated in I think the last PTE and was commented upon, that the timing on the last PTE meant that QA was backlogged enough or the QA process takes so long that it was no longer possible to change anything not 'game breaking' and the PTE was for stability.
ah
It is definitely not a clone of the heavy tank guns though or it would pop mediums in one hit and it doesn't.
i mean the reload speed on it pretty much allows it to lmao
by angled correctly of course it means just essentially shoot the tank anywhere.
I would actually like to see the penetration of the heavy guns to work similar to how it works on the medium where hit boxes are tighter (ignoring the Pz IV which is just one giant hit box) and you have to aim at say the medium Sherman from the Pz IV to kill it so you get into more of a duel than just aim at the enemy tank and pop it twice, but that would really exacerbate the Tiger vs. 76 issue.
Yeah a patch will drop, we all take this stuff very seriously and it hurts our feelings when stuff is changed or broken but they aren't going to just drop patches every week, that causes other issues.
yea
I imagine they have all sorts of mandatory processes/QA/etc. to go through before pushing an update to steam, because imagine the outrage you get when stuff is broken.
I just watched a video of a spot in the t-34 where you can kill a tiger from the front
lol
very hard shot tho
also in the m4
Yeah shot traps are cool.
Yea i just recreated it in an empty server. Very hard shot. at 200m you need to be on level ground and the tiger's gun needs to be pointed right at you but if you aim down his gun pretty much you can pen his turret ring for a 2 shot kill. Ofc doing this in an actual game is nearly impossible lol
The only way you could really kill a tiger like this in a real game is if he is solo tanking and extremely incompetent lol
Still a very cool skill shot tho
Better some chance than just dying at least.
also its funny that this shot is possible in the m4 and t-34 but not the 75. haha the 75 is so useless its sad
You mean to say you can do it in the jumbo 75 but not the medium 75?
Tank bible says you can do it from either.
No the video I watched says you can do it in the mediums not the heavy 75
when i say 75 im talking about the jumbo 75
Yeah tank bible indicates you can do it in both, AFAIK the guns on the two tanks are identical, I'd be very surprised if you couldn't do it in the jumbo 75
I need a regular tank crew to play with so badly. Playing with randoms who have no idea what they are doing is so tiring after a while.
Yes, I have one person but I need a 3rd ideally
You need jesus
thankyou so much for your insight
If you crew with two, just park near friendly garrison
But make sure you are in a heavy tank
The driver can use the coax gun to help the pushing infantry and the gunner can watch out for tanks
is there a place to advertise a new server?
yes I understand how to 2 man tanks
Also the 75 jumbo and the sherman m4 should have the same gun
I still solo the heavies sometimes
I park it at the edge of the map with the tail angled towards the edge
The slow turret is painful but better having a solo tanker than no tanks on the field
meh, debatable
I dont know how that is even debatable
If there are legitimately no other tankers operating and you have excess fuel I guess it doesn't hurt anything but it's so frustrating when people are doing that and you're short on resources
solo tanking is terribly inefficient and waste of resources and time. I would rather just have some competent AT infantry than a solo tanker.
ok have fun trying to engage multiple enemies at the same time or having to deal with any one who is flanking you
And with a heavy i usually dont even take much damage from other tanks
I mean if there are multiple and they both zero me in then gg
But its not always the case
ok š
Having one tank is better than no tank
Simple mafs, 1 > 0
That fuel is not going to win the game
Gotta spend
Yeah I shit talk solo tankers because most of the time when I see them I'm in a crewed tank and they're wasting resources, whether it be fuel, cool downs or auto spawns.
One time one had the gall to go maybe we have too many tank crews, while he was solo and another crew was solo.
Yep
Also the solo tankers are not going to be effective, they will just die in 2 minutes
If you are in a solo tank squad you should ask the commander for 2 people to join you.
Why would you ask the commander that, what are they going to do about it.
I dont tank if there are already tankers
You can ask the commander or other SL's for any infantry that wants to switch to tank.
This is something that happens all the time
Yes but that's asking command chat not the commander.
He can't talk to anyone you can't.
Bro, dont you just hate when you command and the squad leaders use you as proxy as if the other squad leaders cant hear them
If you are solo tanking, you are the tank commander. You can ask command chat for people to switch.
See when you say "the commander" I assume you mean the commander of the team, because why would I ask myself for more crew?
So I say again, why would you ask the commander dude he isn't your secretary.
????
Commander please tell command chat I could use more tank crews.
You just ask in command chat if you can get more people to join you. What is hard to understand?
Because you're saying the commander, not command chat which isn't the same thing.
But tanking with randoms is an exercise in frustration anyway.
It really is
Back when it was easy to solo, i got more tank kills than when i tanked with randoms
You ask in the commander voice chat. "I am a solo tanker, can I maybe get 2 infantry to switch." SL's will then ask their squads if anyone wants to switch and get back to you. This is how communication works.
Yes, but that is not what you said, but this is a pointless argument so I'm going to drop it.
š
It doesnt matter, you can ask the commander himself and then the commander can ask SL's holy lord
I feel your pain
Dont worry bout it, just move on to something else
Im scared to move on now considering we got stuck on that.
The contention is asking command chat directly, vs. asking the commander to ask for you.
Because option 2 is weird and pointless and clogs up command chat with a double ask.
You literally just pose the question in VC and someone will respond. It might be the Commander it might not be
Anyway the real answer here is tanking with randoms has a poor chance of success because you have no cohesion even if everyone is competent/knowledgeable in the roles they're in which is a real shot in the dark to begin with.
yes
Normally fuel isn't that important if you have no tanks on the field and aren't going to be using them but there's an argument to be made for using that fuel for half tracks and fighting their tanks with regular AT and AT guns.
Fielding half tracks while the enemy has tank dominance is practically throwing fuel away
I guess it's better to try than to not if you're getting wrecked by enemy tanks but it takes less teamwork to get a gun going than it does to successfully drive to and engage an enemy tank.
Yeah if you drive them all the way forward but if you don't need the fuel for anything why not just park a couple far back to use as spawns recon can't kill if you weren't using that fuel anyway, obviously Kursk is Kursk.
What is the point of a half track?
Its a mobile spawn point
Okay
you can use to flank the enemy
It's a spawn point that recon can't disable short of proxy locking it, it's relocatable and it doesn't prevent you from building other garrisons, makes it a great backline option especially if you aren't fuel constrained.
So if you stop the half track and let people spawn in, where are they going?
a super valuable piece of equipment if you use it correctly
I'd rather have a backline half track than spending the fuel on someone to go blow up for the 8th time without making any impact.
Thats speculative
lol
What good is a spawn if the tank will just steam roll through your objectives anyways
Anyway I was talking about using fuel for something else (half tracks) in the situation where you do not have any or any effective tankers at all and infantry can wreck their armor with AT guns if they choose to use them.
Or at least, it's easier to coordinate 2 guys building a gun and killing a tank than it is to get 3 randoms to hop into a tank and operate it effectively enough to kill same tank, unless that tank just can't touch them because it's a class down or whatever.
I feel like that command chat argument earlier was me being pointlessly pedantic so I apologize.
Look, if you are the only tanker on the team, you have excess fuel, your squad is open, you have asked for more people and got no one then go for it and solo tank. At that point you have done all you can do, whatever. But I still think an AT player(s) will be more effective than you.
Its fine lol. I just meant commander vc in general.
Had a good game as commander
We still lost
But
Uh
I think we did good
Even though I couldnāt rely on my team to defend fucking garrisons
They are effective but not reliable
Another one of my complaints is how fucking hard it is to get a squad to donate and engineer to build resource nodes
Itās just the fact that so many fucking people play as engineer and are unwilling to be an "engineer"
The roles exists for a reason
I noticed the opposite , people are catching on about the passive support point xp
They snatch up those supply trucks and build nodes early
Iāve mostly seen the be used for garrisons
Sometimes they snatch up the trucks without an officer and that irritates me
And then sometimes the team is only attacking one side of the obj
No flanks or anything
That irritates me when every is bunched up together
All it takes is one bombing run to completely ruin the whole team
Our main problem was actually building and defending garrisons
I would run logistics myself but I was really far and I kept rubber banding while in supply truck
I was literally 1km away and it was painful
Gonna try to always have one squad on logistics
Have to use airhead to reinforce a captured objective because none of the attackers planned for a capture
š
Its warfare
Havenāt played warfare command yet
Its harder
But I did pretty good for my first time
There was one objective left
If I had artillery I could do very evil things to the other teaam
I have a guy that does artillery very well, found him while I was playin as an officer, we were just playing support and hitting tanks and other vehicles
Recon is hard for me
Itās the only role I canāt play
Iāve never really been on a team where recon is effectively used
I feel like there should be radio channels for each unit type
Like an armored radio channel, recon and one for infantry
Its too confusing for people to grasp the three chats we have now
They dum
People just need to learn how to not communicate useless shit
Most of the time the radio is used for something useful
I have thought about that. Unfortunately the VOIP system is a mess to deal with and also having so many radio channels and how they work could become very confusing for players
It is very simple
theres a guy with a satchel behind whoever has the 76mm.
Good example
Bro i just did some nasty things to my gf
Sweden isn't a real country
Man this team sucks
Bad example
If radios acted like real radios nothing would ever get communicated properly
They should put the feature in the game and weed out the dumbasses
Would weed out virtually a good chunk of the playerbase
I would love if they added some way tank crews could actually communicate that didn't clog up command chat. Maybe another tank role like radio crewman or something. If both tanks had a radio crewman they could communicate with each other. Would be nice.
Youd be at post scriptum level
No because those people would just learn enough to be annoying
Command chat is a shitshow
yep
Thatās why we need more channels
well, depends on the server tbh
Having more channels won't fix the problem
but most of the time yes
I feel like it would
You'll just have random dudes clogging up more channels with useless info
We arenāt adding barriers to communication we are simply building more than 3 fucking bridges
And Os now have to listen to a 4th line of communication
Potentially at the exact same time
Weād have to fix that
You should only be able to listen to the channel you have set
Just make it a setting
If you want to listen to 6 channels at once thatās your choice
Theres really no need for more then 2 channels, if people would just use the comms appropriately.
But people gonna do what people gonna do
Squad chat shouldnt even exist
Should just be local and team
Swuad chat encourages squads to fracture up
How would it encourage them to fracture
Because then they have to be near their SL for command guidance and information
They can't yeet into the HQ artillery zone
Alone
Iām not saying your channel specifically for your unit should be removed
I mean, technically they could. But they will be completely alone
You should always be able to communicate with you CO
Ergo, you need to be in voice prox range to communicate with your SL
Even in modern armies most soldiers that aren't NCOs don't have a radio
And this was even more true during ww2, where a LT would be the lowest level with a radio besides specific missions
Interesting
It's not a bad idea for tanks (and artillery) to have their own channel, and a tank phone that acts like a two person prox chat.
Ye
If I want to talk specifically to my armored units I should be able to
yea i just made the suggestion in new member feedback for a tank radio channel of some kind
Right?
They should replace squad chat with tanker chat
The more voice channels you add the more potential voices I have talking in my ear which is not a great thing, and if I mute the channel then people are just talking into the wind clogging the channel up more wondering why I'm not responding.
Thatās why I wanted it to be an option
You be able to make it so that you are listening ONLY to the channel you selected
Rather than all at once
Maybe itās still a bad thing
when you install this game, it starts the public testing realm install first, can i pause this and install the actual game first or will this mess up the installation?
Well, on PC I really don't see this happening because of Vivox, but it's nice to dream.
They're totally separate builds you don't need the PTE installed to play.
Console players already have an additional "party" channel. But I agree something like a tank/artillery channel should only be heard if you're "tuned in".
right on, looking forward to get into the game. how does this discord do for finding players? or am i better off finding a separate clan/discord for for comm games
Otherwise you're cluttering command chat with low level tank manoeuvre, or artillery requests, etc... although you can get away with it if the commanders/officers exercise some brevity.
Check in both #pc-looking-for-unit and #pc-divisions-recruitment HTH.
I've never tried playing with anyone from this discord, a lot of community servers, NPA, Glow, etc. have associated discords, I'd recommend playing on actively admin'd community servers.
Also give the new players guide a read https://www.reddit.com/r/hellletloose/comments/q23r8m/_/
nice, ill give it a look
Play with me you will have lots of fun
<@&365680483276816385> I would like to speak to a mod if possible.
New to HLL if you want to play add me RISK104 on Xbox Iāll be on after the gym
@brazen peak DM me if you'd like to chat
How the fuck do you expect me to build fucking garrisons then??
Like Iām genuinely curious wtf do you want me to do
Maybe it could fall alittle afore the parachute opens
Whatās the point of complaining when I trust your squad to defend the supplies until they drop
Ill liter the map with supplies, so many supply drop the enemy lose track
The trick is to drop it 300- 400 m away from enemy strong point
The further it is the more likely theyll be to not care about
The one true answer to whether or not that pineapple goes on pizza
The power of Christ compels you! š¦
Phone keypads are small man
Yea my fongers cover up wards of 6 keys on my phone
I cant even turn this app sideways
Literally holding phone up with one hand and typing with the one other thumb
I have to use my index finger
I thought pineapple was the worst thing to put on pizza, i was wrong, anchovies are
Im used to eating dried and crispy anchovies i thought thats how they were for pizzas too, i was wrong. Theyre soggy and briny
I hope you are asking the squad if itās okay/clear to drop supplies first š§š§
I always do because I donāt want to lose those supplies, that much is common sense
Good job dirty Dan
I just hate when that particular squad fails to follow up
I drop it on them anyways
š
Maybe not right on them but close
Cause lets be real, they arent gonna take the point themselves
And the chances of them being that smart to swap roles to double up on supplies is very slim
Won my first game as commander last night. Had a really awesome group of Officers to play around.
I wish I had a fun group of officers my game
We definitely would have fucking won
The fact that there was radio silence %60 of the game
That's why I really had to stop playing console.
I only put a couple of hours into it but the three games I played, it was me and maybe two other people with mics.
While I don't think they're absolutely necessary, having coms does make things a hell of a lot smoother.
S! fellow comrades
so i have a question - im looking to pick up a ww2 large scale tactical shooter next month (im sure you know which two are on my mind) and hell let loose is seeming like a very attractive choice considering its big player base. theres two things im concerned about though
one big thing and one small thing
Hi @indigo belfry hi @thin delta
the big thing being shitty lone wolf type players, since i do want to stick mostly to playing closely with teams. and with a game this popular, matchmaking can sometimes be its downfall with players that do not care about teamwork in the slightest being matched up with you. how competent is the average squad in yalls experience?
i suppose with the popularity of the game im expecting a lot of the players to have come over from stuff like battlefield and treating the game as such. if thats not a common thing, im glad, because im coming from more serious milsim experiences and kind of just want a fun ww2 shooter thats still nice and cooperative
You're always going to run into players who won't listen or just want to be asses for the sake of the lulz but the community has so many genuinely good men and women that you'll more often than not be in good company.
You looking to play on PC or console?
pc
Because on PC you can choose to play on community servers and link up with a community as opposed to playing on random stuff, console is just match making so you have no real control.
Console side might be a little different but on PC mostly everyone I've ran into comes from Rising Storm, Squad, or Post Scriptum.
Increasing your odds of being able to play with people that will play how you want to play.
Random squads even on PC are just that, random and you'll get a mix of people who don't talk/do whatever they want and people who work well.
post scriptum is the other game id be looking into but the low player count and slow development cycle are kind of turning me off, although i do prefer more realistic gameplay. hell let loose should still be up there with what im used to, from what ive seen
Also community servers are nice because they go hand in hand with active admins so when people are TKing/etc. you can rely on active intervention instead of vote kicks.
PS is so cheap you might as well get both.
Well it was cheap, it's not on sale anymore.
fair point, ive also been looking into doing that haha
keeping in mind that im in germany of course
Post Scriptum is good BUT it has a much steeper learning curve imo. You might like that. I didn't find it nearly as engaging as HLL.
i mean i have 550 hours or so in arma 3, most of that in highly modded milsim, so im a sucker for steep learning curves
but HLL just feels more polished from what ive seen and polish is very nice to have
While HLL does emulate a lot of milsim elements I'd say it's the most friendly of the games in that genre. You can confirm kills. It technically has hit markers. I just think the combat is some of the best in the genre.
of course i havent played either game yet so im just relying on what other people are saying
dude ease up on the analysis paralysis, itās just a video game š
Plenty of YouTube/Twitch stuff out there you can watch both.
buy it and give it a go, you can always refund it if it isnāt your speed
HLL is what like $40? It's not hard to get hundreds of hours out of it at which point it's basically free.
how long does a HLL match usually take in your experience?
There's a game called world war two online which is jokes, terrible graphics but basically a WW2 simulator (pc only)
45 minutes
good amount of time
Warfare max time is 90 minutes, Offensive max time is 2.5 hours + potential for short overtime.
Depends. We steam rolled two games last night and had them finished in 15 and 19 minutes each. Then I've had games drag out for the whole 90 minutes.
So the shortest you realistically see is around 20 minutes for Warfare, depends how badly the team gets steam rolled.
You save the XP you get as you go, you just don't get end of match bonuses so leaving early isn't the end of the world.
also this is another weirdly important thing to me - i hate doing voice chat in german, and i know that this is how it usually goes with ww2 games in germany because theyre different versions but, do germans play on german-exclusive servers or on EU servers? the latter would be greatly preferable
wat
You can play on any server you have a good ping to.
thats good
There's no swastikas in game so you guys aren't walled off.
perfect!
You'll love the game.
It took me a bit to really get it but once it finally clicked, it's all I play. I really haven't gone back to Squad since.
Iām confused bruh
And I'm still in quarantine so I'm going to get a couple of games in here soon.
If you spend a few minutes reading the new players guide https://www.reddit.com/r/hellletloose/comments/q23r8m/_/ you'll have a general idea of how the game works.
the stalingrad video by karmakut has made me really want to play hell let loose haha
so⦠play it
It's something squads should be utilizing. You deploy your op. Your first support drops their supplies. Redeploy into a different role. Then someone else in your squad redeploys as support. Spawn on op. Drop their supplies. Boom. 100 supplies in enemy territory with no air drop.
Don't be a dick. This channel is here for people to ask questions.
i like to consider things a little more carefully before spending money on them, so im asking stuff ahead of time
how is that being a dick? donāt be an oversensitive twat
Because you seem upset that someone wants to get a couple of questions answered before making a purchase.
We're here to help.
youāll like it. most of us came from milsims and have well over 1000 hours
im not upset. project onto someone else
The only problem is randoms hate redeploying. I guess because it counts as a death. Their poor kda!
Gentlemen. You can't fight in here. This is the War Room!
i will fight here or there, i will fight everywhere
Two completely different things. Dropping supplies vs. Swapping, if they arenāt gunna swap, you should still ask before dropping imo. Iāll still drop them if theyāre silent, their fault then
also because this is a ww2 game and i know what tends to happen with ww2 games - the community isnt full of weird ww2-era-germany fetishizing dickwads?
Liberalists
its one of the things that makes me never want to touch hoi4 with a 10 foot pole
theyāre around, but they get yeeted pretty quickly
good
You can find wehraboos anywhere. I don't think they're common.
It's called swapping because the first support switches roles so someone else can take the support class. It's two sets of 50 supplies with no cool down. And any strong offensive squad should utilize it.
and they definitely donāt last long in community servers
Another bonus to community servers, they can get rid of anyone they want.
Bruhhhhh this aināt about swapping š
Please treat others as you would wish to be treated. We ask that you remain polite and civil, failure to do so will result in a ban.
Oh God. Now I'm thinking about War of Rights. š¤®š¤®
This barracks be š„ lately
wait, who was breaking that rule?
I was looking forward to that game. The Confederate fetishists...
Sometimes I wanna think Iād enjoy it, but way too slow for my liking
yup, im avoiding games id otherwise love to play simply because of who else plays them
gotta be especially careful as a trans person tbh
Yeah, I think most HLL communities are really good about getting those kind of players out of their servers.
War of Rights, meanwhile. Jesus. I had to refund it. It was so bad.
Anyone else not able to see other enemies for the life of themselves?
It's hard, especially if they aren't moving.
If you're playing on console your TV size/distance from the TV may also be an issue.
It's a thing that comes with time. I recommend you watch monoespecial on YouTube. He has a good breakdown on taking your time and spotting enemies.
oh another concern of mine is with the slightly more lenient loadouts compared to games like post scriptum - is there some sort of system in place to keep everyone from just using automatic weapons?
Nope.
Nah.
Every US troop has at least a semi-auto, with the exception of the up to 2 snipers on the team. Most of the german team is going to have a semi auto or at least an MP-40, but there are some bolt action riflemen and the Soviets have a lot of PPSh's, with some bolt actions.
That is one thing a couple of my Post Scriptum friends stopped playing HLL due to - weapons
The tanks are a decent counter to small arms.
itd kind of break my immersion if i was playing on, say, the stalingrad map but all the germans were just running stg44s
But I know people who put in work with the bolt actions and prefer them to the semi auto.
Each class has different loadouts that are unlocked at different levels which affects what weapons you personally can use.
I regret to inform you.
the devs have abandoned any sense of realism in that aspect
do community servers implement fixes for that?
But there's not that many stgs, only a couple of classes.
No, no mods, very limited server side settings.
Nah STG is limited to I think just the assault class. That said, you're going to see a lot of MP40s
Automatic Rifleman also has it.
automatics are everywhere
You'll also see Tigers and late war Pz IVs on Stalingrad if you find that unacceptable.
devs donāt give a shit
i suppose ill be the player to use the kar98k in that case haha
Bolt actions are still really good.
id imagine so
TTK in the game is low, so you generally unless you hit limbs don't need to shoot someone with a bolt action more than once, unless they're far away.
mp40s are gonna have a worse time to kill in any game that knows how to balance
My friend averages about 30 kills per game. Doesn't like any weapon aside from SVT and Kar.
But it's still going to be exceedingly difficult to shoot a guy with a K98 when they're mag dumping PPSh suppression at you.
Yeah that's true too.
semi auto rifles like the garand would probably be the sweet spot for me
not because i can rapid fire but because the sight picture doesnt get fucked with after every shot
Might get the Czech ZB-26 or ZB-30 as a mid war replacement for the StG 44
i mean at least its not a battlefield 1 situation where literally everyone is running around with super late war experimental smgs
i could definitely still get immersed even with too many mp40s
Yeah all of the weapons/tanks are real, even if they don't operate exactly like their real life counter part, but they're available no matter the year, the vehicle roster is small though so it wouldn't really work well if they weren't available.
Realistically nobody in here at this point is going to tell you to do anything but buy it and try it.
gonna be until the 1st until i have money again so im just doing my best with the time till then haha
If money is that tight I'd watch some people play on Twitch until then and decide if you think you'll like it, the steam refund window is pretty small.
money isnt tight, i just dont have any right now haha
Water is not wet, it's just liquidy.
watch content if you're still unsure, we can answer gameplay questions. ĀÆ_(ć)_/ĀÆ
im pretty much set on buying hell let loose at this point, this conversation reaffirmed me
Thankfully absent from the games Iāve been in - probably spend their time watching āāāhistoryāāā vids on odd parts of YouTube
Happy to have a new player on board!
Welcome
You can still find them, someone a week or two back linked an SS Discord in here, but community servers will filter that stuff out.
"how can we make every country have an assault rifle" seems to be the dice way to go about it
the weapons i mean
glad hell let loose doesnt do that at least
Expect the average enemy you run into to either have a semi auto or some sort of automatic weapon, be that a submachine gun or whatever, it's not always true but it's common.
just means im gonna have an advantage at range with a kar98k haha
or garand, i suppose. or mosin.
or SMLE but apparently the british faction is DLC?
The British content does not exist as a released product at this time.
oh right thats still coming
It's on the 2022 content roadmap.
yknow what scares me about the roadmap?
Any chance the mods could pin the current roadmap in here.
the FG42 being on the roadmap makes me kind of scared that a bunch of people are gonna be running around with a gun that was essentially vaporware
The FG42 is already in game.
It came out in U11 (latest release, came out 7 December)
Not really? That's an opinion, it's available to level 6 automatic rifleman as a 20 round full auto and to the level 4? something sniper as a 10 round semi-auto with a lower power zoom than the K98.
thats not too bad
itās also not all that great
if Iām playing AR, Iād much rather use the STG
if Iām sniper, Iād rather use the kar98
gotcha
Pffff
A lot of people in here, myself included have very strong opinions, especially about certain aspects of the game and our opinions won't necessarily translate to your actual in game experience.
ill probably still have a really nice time
100%
Also be aware when watching YouTube content to evaluate stuff, we're on U11 (7 Dec 21 release), U10 came out 20 July 2021, don't know when U9 came out, but look at the upload date and you should be able to figure out what update it was on.
So sometimes there's game play changes between updates, and then there's new content, for instance the Pz IV came out in U11 and the Panther was temporarily removed until U12.
So if you want to run around in a Panther you'll be temporarily disappointed.
RIP my panther bb
Yeah I'm curious to see what it changes in to, what an unbalanced medium tank in U10 though that thing was tooooo good for what it was.
There's really only one change I am hoping for in U12 and that's that god damn loadout rework
and by loadout rework I mean giving Medic and Sniper SMGs of course.

Microsoft just bought Activision Blizzard for 68 billion dollars
That almost 10 times what Bethesda was bought for
Wonder how the Cod franchise will handle it's limited content and early releases for the playstation now.
Wow, smells like monopoly is getting closer and closer
God I hate the gaming industry
Nah.
Aside from WoW, it hasnt produced anything really spectacular.
Some employee is prob getting a bonus for inflating internal numbers to get that 68 billion dollar merger
Might not even be 100% cash, prob stock deals like every other buyout
its a pretty reasonable figure considering their market cap before all the sexual assault drama started tanking their stock price
Are we talking about CNN here?š¤
wat
Poor ps players ):
Good thing Sony owns most of the good IPs in the console space anyway
But it will soon be all they own
Does it?
Hmmm š¤ people think too deeply about pixels on a screen.
I think hard about everything, it tickles my neurons
Neuron stimulation is highly addictive.š¤
When it's the biggest entertainment industry, people care.
It is the biggest, thatās true.
š¤¤
Im sure the people spending 70B in assets are thinking deeply about pixels on the screen
Seems a bit obsessive and nerdy to me.š
Guess all the people sitting in discord on a Tuesday are nerdy anyway lol
okay im just gonna buy both hell let loose and post scriptum so i don't have to break my head figuring out which one to get
Have you played squad?
nope, just arma
Hardly no one is playing Post scriptum⦠thatās a sign itās not very good.
that's not how it works
Yes it is
So the most glaring difference is the ticket system of PS
In that game, you start with a finite amount of resources and have to play more carefully to manage them. In HLL you have a resource system but can put in place nodes that will generate the resource. So it turns more into a management game and not a rationing game
That's the biggest notable difference for me.
judging from footage, gunplay and movement are a good bit different in post scriptum as well, and i think both games have enough going for them for me to get them and play them in different moods
Iāve watched people playing it on YouTube and Twitch, it looks cartooney and not very good.
I mean, maybe a tad bit different. Both still more similar than something like Cod for instance.
I don't think the differences are very large
For me it came down to things like Team17 backing HLL, the character customization, gameplay direction, popularity.
I own both
But only play HLL
fair, i just kinda gotta see
Post Scriptum is dead, don't even bother tbh
Post Scriptum has 550 players average last 30 days
Hell Let Loose is 5.4k
Global
the game has a lot more updates planned soon than it had recently, so it may well rebound
well, it is a much smaller team
the fixed loadouts would be a big plus to me, no squads full of mp40s or anything
both games have pros and cons
HLL really took the wind off of PS
If it wasn't around the same time as HLL, maybe it woulda gone better, but I wouldn't be surprised if the game shut down
Each class takes probably 20-30 hours of playtime to get to the point that they can just have an mp40. And it's only about half of the classes that can even use said gun
And there are tons of instances in which the kar98 is better
theyre still actively developing and have a sizeable modding community. the game is way more active in europe than in america
Honestly just sounds like you want both
which i do
You don't have to justify it to us lol
i kind of just like pointing out my reasoning
Definitely fair, but consider where you are. We don't hang in the HLL discord because we like PS lol
Just going to get a biased answer out of most people I guess
well to be fair, mentioning HLL by name in the PS discord isnt allowed
Oof
a big disadvantage and what could well kill PS for me is the fact that german servers are separate to EU servers because the original game contains swastikas. and i really do not care for german voice chat haha
Yeah, I could imagine
Looking at player stats, PS has been dying quick, just over 200 players average in October 2021
I want a pacific map so bad but i know some people wouldnt want that lmao
It would feel more like slow battlefield V
I want more Russian maps that aren't hot garbage
Oof
I hate both Russian maps, Kursk is basically built for snipers
Which is fun if you're a sniper or a good shot
I like making hard shots
Its become a habit
Now if the shot is easy, i refuse to take it
Its become a weakness
No
I'd be curious to see how a controller works in HLL
I feel like it would be difficult to make micro adjustments
Terribly
Not well probably, PC master race tier represent
Do they have some level of aim assist?
Well you can still play controller on PC
I think you mean MKB superior lol
I mean if youre surgical with the thumb, good for you
It's not really a thing?
I have more wrist control than thumb
Maybe the top 10% of controller players are "surgical with a thumb"
But it's probably even less than that
How common is it for someone to make 200 m shots with a controller
Great question
Couldn't even tell you how common it is for someone to use a controller
I don't know the console playerbase,. Gameplay style
I have never played a console
Maybe they fight at closer ranges?
Wouldn't know
It used to be the longest reach for gun fight was battlefield for console
This is prob the first of its kind for console games
I have to say it is cool seeing indie games enter the console market
I wouldn't call the HLL devs indie
What would you call them?
A dev
Somewhere between AAA and indie
What is that called?
They have tons of big games on their name
Silly
Not sure it has a name
I guess?
It's more just to express not large established video game companies with popular names making a game?
Dunno
But you can argue this one specifically
I'm more just talking about in general
Tons of indie teams making console games
Who cares!š
You asked
Not me.
This u?
You need to see a doctor if you forgot that fast
Yeah, seeing as how the term AAA is a informal classification. You could use AA and A.
There just seems to be a insurrection of AAA games by the consumer
It wasnāt me, it was the one armed man.
I love The Goonies
So whatās it called then??
Your mom
Potty mouth!š
that's microsoft for you
They better still be working on diablo 4!
It's coming for phones again
DO YOU GUYS NOT HAVE PHONES??
We have lives.
And HLL is apart of it.š
Anything else is Triple AAA Nonsense.
This of course, is my independent thoughts š
Theres been a decline in creativity in act/bliz
You can tell after the 2nd diablo the story turned to shit
Same for starcraft
I dont need to say much about cod
When you live in an echochamber
I believe so?
Has tons of new releases on gamepass
Gears 5 releases straight to gamepass, Halo infinite, almost all the Bethesda games
4.99/ month
On PC
There is a version bundled with the Xbox live subscription for 15.99
Iāve deleted all that, donāt like it running in the background.š
Usually free for 3 months for new users
Lots of excellent games to be fair... Sea of thieves etc
If you buy packs of gummy worms, you get free months of Gamepass
Like $3 a month when you do the matb
Is ther any greeks playing this game any community I can join if there is one please dm me guys!
I believe there is even a Greek community established if you browse through #pc-divisions-recruitment
@dawn widget āļø
Uh. No it's not
?? read what my message said
Mentioning HLL isn't forbidden
it kind of is
Nope
You just can't usually post videos promoting it. Or to the opposite effect, you can't overly bash it either
on that topic, i got a kind of stupid question about HLL that i haven't seen mentioned in any videos
how do the magazines work? usual shooter magic where they refill when you reload, or more realistic where throwing away a half empty mag means you lose those rounds?
Shooter magic
sad
Would be interesting to have some realistic ammunition accountability
Dare I say it, neat
hey lads
thinking of buying the game
is the dlc needed at all? does it divide the player base between those that have and those that dont
it's just cosmetics for now
expansions, like new fronts will very likely be chargeable DLC
chargeable?
paid
not a fan of those, always end up dividing the playerbase, but if there are none atm then we gucci
hello there. I'm new to these type of games. just bought Hell Let Loose.
there will be, they've already alluded to it for future content. They've said they don't intend to split the playerbase with the paid DLC, but we don't know for sure how they will. People have speculated ways already however.
Whatās a good clan for someone new and not trying to take this super seriously
I made 14 kills at 200m+ last night with the BAR on PHL... it was not easy, took 2-3 shots on each one.
One speculative idea I heard was only unlocking loadouts for new factions when you buy the expansion (while still recording XP towards the role)
Would be better than what itās going to be
Surely they will keep the kickstarter stuff free for everyone like the pacific and British expansion
Those were stretch goals which weren't met
^ argument slightly undermined by mortars ($110K) not being in the game yet
Some of the ones that werenāt met are already in
But I see your point
Yeah I'm just being a lawyer, I think the moral argument supports you
No Kickstarter, no game
This seems like the type of game that would be way more fun if every squad wasn't so quiet
my mic is broke
Does anyone know how to play pc with Xbox
Or maybe stream a Xbox to pc to play with them
There's no crossplay between consoles and PC.
He heard wrong or the people he listens are stupid š¤·
Hopefully they add it
I honestly don't know how people keeps coming here with that misconception.
Or maybe add it to cloud gaming
I searched it up but just wanted to make sure
No I'm not blaming you, I blame your friend who told you this misinformation.
š¤·
Would you say heāll let loose us still fun without friends
Can anyone tell me if there is a feature to check out the maps with some sort of camera besides spectator mode without owning your own server? Id like to plan strats for myself and my friends on some of the maps. Or is there anyone thats willing to allow me to spectate their maps on their server? Was especially looking for Omaha as its one of the maps played competitively. Thanks
Omaha is never played competitively
But no, you need a server or someone willing to lend you theirs
Is there a way to allow someone to spectate on their server without giving admin perms?
And sorry forgot this was Utah
Not Omaha
what if female player models for the soviets š³
What we really need is for some of the maps like kursk not to be absolute a$$. It's literally a big triangle w/o cover.
1 or 2 other maps are quite annoying, but besides that, I'm having an absolute blast in-game
Clocked 54.9h already and starting to lead squads
I play it 90% solo. It's super fun, I'd you're willing to make friends along the way, talk in game, communicate. If you don't, others won't. It's 100% doable.
thats one thing i hate about insurgency lmao, the game is heavily built around communication and unless you really annoy the hell out of your team they wont start talking
I guess? That's the nature of uncoordination, is playing with random people. I don't think uncoordination doesn't mean you can't win though.
Insurgency is like hardcore Cod, where as HLL is not. I think if you play HLL you have the willingness to play with the squad.
Hehe true
You are right šÆ . There's pretty much no point in playing this game without communication
Dr English are you here?
Wheyyy hello chaps Dr English here part timer gamer
Welcome soldier
How are you finding the game @indigo belfry ?
Huh?
I think that was sarcasm
Seeding HLL Official - Europe #06 ,, we need more players
"seeding" an official server 
Seeding is dirty š¤¤
Wrong channel, there is #pc-seeding-help 
Plenty of hot singles on #pc-seeding-help
even despite any licensing/technical issues, there's a massive difference between controller and M+kb players
mouse aim will kill the controller 8/10 times
mouse and keyboard is better for FPS games , but controller is better for more movement based games like dying light and rally
Remember to disable Enhance Pointer Precision in the Mouse Control Panel settings to ensure both Controllers and the Mouse benefit.
hi, is in this game some group system that i can play with my friends?
You can create a squad and lock it, so your friends can join it
I hope when (if) they add a better queuing system, you can create a lobby to search for a match w/ friends
That would be good.
Hey all, thinking about picking up the game. Just wondering if anyone plays on Linux? I'm on Ubuntu and the game isn't listed as compatible on Proton but often it ends up working anyway. Just want to know before I spend the money
can i see my group mates some other colors than other players?
i think there's an issue with EAC working with linux
OK will consider getting it for the windows boot. Saw some YouTube clips and looks great.
Your squad is highlighted as green on the map and when they use squad voice chat, you'll also be grouped together on the scoreboard
yeah you also can join a friend's game on steam via the "Join Game" function which was added recently
and you and your friends can all buy VIP to a particular server that is ideal based on your locations and skip queues/play together at ideal pings. Some servers have cheap VIP deals (like $3-$5/month)
The shot being a compressed one of a model in shadow also does not help Hell Let Loose.
the big advantage for CoD is motion captured animation
also the ability to force interesting visual action
El Alamein still looks fantastic at 4k today
He also screen shotted a tweet for some reason instead of just linking said tweet
Both are cropped photos. They should both probably be shown in their full picture to better get his point across
i hope when they add the british , that the british enfield shoots rather quickly
Is this where i search for peopel to pl;ay with
DM if u wanna play ima good officer
Whats the most important thing in the game?
Communication
Youre a terrible officer
Alr
Fair enough
I change my answer
Getting kills
OI YOU FECKEN POMPOUS LITTLE SHITS FUCKEN DM ME IF YOU WANT TO PLAY SOME BLOODY HELL LET LOOSE YOU MOTHERLESS SLAGS
It's spawns the answer is spawns
God bless
oh true but communication is foundational
to setting up good spawn points n stuff
and in making spawn points useful
you can have all the spawn points in the world but if theres no communication for strategy and orders, people won't use them right
You don't know how many times my squad has worked their asses off setting up spawns but command chat wasn't good so literally no one used them right
how high can you stack?
I stack mine in the rivers
I should see if i can get one stuck in a tree
Personal favourite is the roof of the church on SME
Is hll coming to game pass or cloud gaming? It would be epic!
Or add crossplay on pc and console
It's on Geforce Now
But make it a another option so if you donāt want to lay with pc you donāt have to
No
Oh
I wish they would
Devs have said they're not going to
It would be daft. PC is all about pixel perfect hits, and console can't compete with that. Instead they have aim assist which works through bushes so is also unfair
They could make play with pc a separate option or make pc have to connect a controller to play with console
It'd be a tiny minority of people who would do that
True
No PC players want crossplay that I've seen
So you'd have just a tiny amount of players using that feature
Plus, right now console and PC aren't even at parity and won't be for many many months
Will they add the panzerfaust for German at?
They already have the Panzershreck
If it's not on the roadmap there's no guarantee they'll add anything
hello, i am starting new with Hell let Loose
Watch this first before jumping straight into the game: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LaY27yiOPPA
Here's EVERYTHING you need to know about Hell Let Loose. This is a complete guide for beginners, covering everything from tanks to spawn points, use of supplies and strategic understanding of the game.
MERCH STORE: https://my-store-10056519.creator-spring.com
Find people to play with on NPA: discord.gg/NPA
0:00 - 01:47 - Intro & Content Guide...
hi im new here, so how do divisions and events work?
Check here: #pc-divisions-recruitment and #pc-looking-for-unit
alright,thanks
You can also check here: #event_rules #legacy-event-announcements
is there any australian devisions i could join please
are there any good servers for teaching newbies?
Nah mate.
rip
Anyone saying 'X server has better gameplay than Y server' is just making it up. The only difference between servers is hardware and admins
The playerbase is all the same
No pc players in their right minds would option out of keyboard/mouse to a controller to cross play with console. Thatās one of the main factors they play pc instead of console
I know people that would, because then they could play w/ their friends on consoles.
Same! Leave cross play for the console players.
Yes mate!
For sure.
You hardly ever come across any squeakers!! š
On PC.
Exodus and 82AD are a clan
I just add ppl on steam who are around my age
And just join them when theyāre playing
Yep šš»
I tell my friends with consoles to get a PC. I definitely don't play the cross play only games just to play with them. š¬š¬
Maybe I'm the bad friend
I have both consoles and a PC, this game was free on PS+ a couple months back hence why i play there. And our gaming group is roughly 50/50 PC and PS4/5. I understand crossplay or requiring a controller on PC is not for everyone but i think itās the best compromise. Though I believe this gen are better at supporting K/M, I havenāt looked into it yet. So maybe offer that as another option.
I can't imagine that's a priority for them for how few people would probably play between PC and consoles.
and there's all sorts of potential issues, they track player progression on Steam, how do they track it on xbox/play station, how does that integrate with steam, can console players play on community servers? how does voice chat integrate, can voice chat integrate?
Would PC players only play on console servers, would console people be able to play on PC servers? Can community servers turn off the ability for console players to join?
Oh i donāt think it should be a priority. And it may not be possible. I am just pointing out there are people that would utilize it and think having it locked by input would be nice way to balance it.
No compromise! Keyboard and mouse is way better than using a controller. Console playerās have their game, enjoy it.
šš
I just don't think they have to coexist. I definitely don't want to play this type of game with any aim assist. I definitely won't play it with a controller.
I'd rather just keep the communities apart.
If you're someone who is a fan of sim shooters and like to stray off the path of Triple A shooters. PC gaming is for you, that's just a niche consoles don't fill.
I switched to PC Gaming 3 years ago, and itās much more relaxing and enjoyable. You constantly get people inviting you to a party chat or randomly joining your party chat and distracting you with silly non-game conversations.š consolesšš»
Yep
I switched like.... 9 years ago? When the Xbox 360 and PS3 were huge. I saw games like Arma 2, DayZ mod, modded Minecraft, RuneScape, Dota. All the types of games you could never play on console.
Never looked back since.
Yep
Found the DOD and Red Orchestra titles
Then really liked this genre of games
Pretty cool their on console, but couldn't be me playing them on there.
Can't really blame people for not playing on PC when graphics cards are so unavailable/expensive.
At this current year? Sure. Though, PC gaming was always affordable people just never bothered to do it.
Everyone needs a pc for other stuff too⦠2 birds with one stone!š¤
Iāve gone the other way. PC and predecessors for life, added consoles fairly recently. There are benefits to each.
I also do InDesign, illustrator, premier, school and work from my desktop.
It's definitely useful if you do more than game.
Only benefit I can think of is you can lay in bed and easily play.
Consoles are more affordable comes to mind haha
But I do that with AoE2⦠I play it on my bed, but thatās on another cheap pcš¤
Only slightly in the long run⦠the subscription fees add up over time.
I mean, assuming you don't overpay for your console. Its still definitely cheaper.
If you pay $1000 for a PS5? Yeah probably more expensive. lol
Controllerās always break⦠games are more expensive
Exactly
a mouse and keyboard combo is probably like 2 or 3 controllers worth of price
maybe 4
Paying to play online as well. Nah, consoles aren't cheaper
$60 a year? multiply that by 5 years? $300, plus the $500 of a console?
Definitely the price of a low tier PC
I just use a cheap keyboard £20 and have the same mouse that cost the same price as a PS5 controller
If you looked up, I said "assuming you don't overpay" and, if we are referring to the current market of gaming. All types of gaming is currently more expensive. If we looked back a few years. Definitely 500 for a console was fairly priced.
I would have had to buy 3 controllers by now
Can I order some PS5s from you at 500 a pop ?
He sells them for £1000
š
I mean, I said my piece. Its easy to take the console is garbage road.
They are 1000 USD+ here . I just checked..
I don't bother with such an easy argument.
So at 500 I'll take a boatload
Itās not garbage, but PCās are Great!!!š
PCMR
I agree, but a weak argument is a weak argument
Too many kids play consoles
