#mess-hall
1 messages · Page 233 of 1
vietnam is lookin SIIIIIIIICK
trailer sure gets the HLL spirit of running really slowly in a straight line
that dragging mechanic is amazing
wonder if medic will actually be useful outside of very specific situations
I really enjoyed when the RPG hit the huey and the camera cut but not before the wreckage lost all momentum and just turned into a static wreck and fireball
LOL
real
bayonets, motars and even dragging and HLL ww2 is left with fake SPAs
guns still look as boring as HLL guns tho
As a WW2 purist who has no interest in vietnam I feel cheated lol
I like nam but RS2 is in my steam library so if I get the nam itch I play that
ngl the game looks really nice, but the motion of soldiers really needs refining
Are we for real
video where?
Wow
even boats
I have seen ppl request that for HLLww2
TBH I think WW2 just needs remaking at this point, game is so old now, and the GFX are just outdated compared to newer titles. 100% there's loads of tech debt as well, IDK why they dont just do a sequel to it but for maps that people know and care about.
Well it's clear now that they're scrapping the OG HLL in favor of this new one. That or the 2027 roadmap will be full of HLL:V mechanics terribly copypasted into the OG
judging purly from the trailer the overall gameplay of the vietnam game doesnt look too different, if they can update some of the mechanics of HLLww2 I think it would be fine
yh the gunplay looks similar
And do you think they will at this point
they literally had the chance to add mortars but decided to go with fake SPAs fsr, despite adding mortars into vietnam
If Vietnam gets more attention than WW2, what's the point anymore
depends if they keep their word on continuing to update ww2
tbh bro, the WW2 game has been out since 2021
its 4 years old, you cant expect it to have full support still when they wanna make a new title
I know, that's why I'm saying this
Outside of mortars, and medic dragging what other mechanics can even get added to that game? It just needs more maps at this point
more ammo to the FG-42
well better loadout balancing, subfactions for existing and future maps, some actual gunplay nuance like an actual magazine system, fire modes and weapon sighting. Improvements to the logistics gameplay and garrisons a bit more interesting damage models for players
improvements to the current gamemodes
We're lucky if we end up getting half of that 💔
yep
some people dont really care too much about the theme of the game and will happily jump ship from a ww2 shooter to a vietnam one, but for me and many others the setting is a very important part of the experience
Vietnam is looking nice but I downloaded this game mostly because of the setting, so I don't think I'll be playing HLL:V. So it's sad to see that it's slowly dying and they're not helping with that
Im not going to jump to HLLV just because its a new HLL game like others might, I want the best from the current game because of the WW2 setting
Same thing different words
longer than that. I think this game first dropped on steam in 2019?
Yeah it was if you got the tester version
i have zero interest in HLLV. Look what happened to HLL, you trust them to deliver a good experience with HLLV? no thanks, i'll play '83 instead for my cold war fix
Vietnam looks amazing
Just me or did the trailer look basic lol
Let's hope that they finally add tickets, otherwise that dragging will be absolutely pointless aside from looking good for YouTube Shorts moments
Average trailer in my eyes. Looks visually impressive and builds up hype, but at the end of the day didn't show much that we didn't already know yet
I'd like rs2 vietnam campaign type of game mode for sure
Yeah reminded me of the brecourt trailer in same style sense but better graphics lol
It always baffles me the negativity on social media about anything new. Just wait for it, play it or don’t. Judge your experience then. Beta before release is good atleast. Free test
BF6 trialer got me pumped. This ones cool but didnt get me pumped up to play it right away.
if they can make the gamemodes and logistics side more interesting and play into such a mode it might work
if the modes and logistics are exactly the same as they are in HLL then that mode would probably not be anything special
Dragging cool, helicopters cool, launchers cool, mortars cool. Movement looks more fluid. We’ll see
Jungle, coolest. I love the Vietnam war and its odd, hated place in history though. So I’m biased I suppose
in this case the negativity is well-warranted. we have 6 years of experience with their prior game in the series, and a series of very recent development stumbles
All im saying is it coulda been longer and had more action. Missed on some things
First thing is mortars after releasing the HLL update that purposely ignored mortars
lmao
Hm, I’ve always liked HLL a lot
so have I, which is why im still here but jesus christ is it ever a mess
@fluid pawn can we read somewhere what the hotfix will be fixing?
Seeing mortars in that game and not this one is making me mad lol
Anyone know when they gonna fix the blurry vieuw
HLL: Vietnam brought to you by: frame gen
Im a miserable skeptic about the game, I never wanted them to make a sequel since I wanted them to put 100% into the current game to make it the best version of itself
Cant see sht from a distance
2026
I wonder if a big chunk of the issue is working on someone else’s trash code and structure.
This will be a good reset for them if it hits
but now all the things we wanted in ww2 HLL is going to the vietnam one I suppose
HOLY PEAK
2026? That really bad
i mean yeah it is part of the issue, but t17 has put in plenty of their own trash code and structure
someone else’s trash code and structure didn't keep T17 from testing their updates or listening to the feedback of the players who volunteered their time to test for them
Me too, man
Just pulling that together atm 🫡 Will also be including the SPA stats that were missing from the changelog
Would be cool if they launched HLLV, and then did a HLL Redux with all updated stuff
and as we all know, done next to no QA
Is it delayed?
its a seperate team iirc
yeah... bunkers are easily destroyed in hll as is
Seeing how HLL tanks are, I can already imagine how crap the helicopters will feel
Just wait
Tomorrow hopefully! 🙂
yes but probably a larger team
Give us Arma helicopter mechanics
So smooth
Death to sky dragon!
Oh god they're cramming it all last second
STRAP UP BOYS A HURRICANE IS A-COMIN
If I can say anything to the devs of hell let loose Vietnam that be I hope this game gets the game of the year of award because look how realistic it is
@fluid pawn is hll done for or there's more development coming?
thats a very random assumption
Travels 600m instantly
Much more to come!
Stay tuned 😊
Not really random, its a literal new game from the ground up, only makes sense for them to give it the bigger team
glad to hear that
They're obviously not going to make it realistic, but most likely easy and accessible to the average player
haha!
I've been seeing a lot of helicopters in HLL the past week
if they make this game REALISTIC then it will die a quick death
well yeah that makes sense, i dont really see any problems, theyre gonna still be very different games, its not like this is a call of duty thing lol
if you want ultra realism, go play ARMA
I just want more from HLLww2 man, SPAs was a bad choice especially when mortars are coming to vietnam
REAL
Not realistic enough, I prefer DCS helis 
More WW2 is coming dw
Are you a community manager?
they genuinely adding the big Nam
I know they said they're gonna keep updating ww2 but quality matters, I dont want the new game to get all of the love and for ww2 to keep getting subpar updates and weird additions that had much better alternatives that the new game gets
When is Remagen getting fixed? In 5 years i never played 1 normal game of Remagen. Such a good map unplayable
you know what, fair enough
I agree
id like to hope that doesnt happen but we'll have to wait and see lol
After seeing the trailer, I'm going to pass on the game and stay with HLL WW2. As a Canadian, Vietnam doesn't interest me 😅
Will people build nodes in Vietnam
i don't know how to tell you this....but......ww2 has been getting subpar updates for like 2.5 years now
Is it on PlayStation plus hell let loose now and hell let loose Vietnam is nothing like a ptsd simulator and realistic and I like that way
Yessir
No
I knew it
I predict: Reloading broken
Send_Nodes
like I said earlier Im not as willing to jump ship to HLLV because I care a lot more for the WW2 setting than simply there being a new game.
I want ww2 to be the best version of itself and It would be a huge shame if thats what HLLV ends up being and WW2 gets left in its messy state
yeah HLL:V has been nothing but a bummer since it was announced, I don't believe this title was ever built as a franchise or should have been turned into one, and I'm personally not half as interested in the setting of the Vietnam war compared to WW2
realistic war games aren't fun, which is they are a niche thing
Hllv is gonna be a real campers parisde
At least HLLV will be dogwater off the rip
arma and squad and the like dont exactly have millions of players
I hope the ww2 one doesn't die
Paradise*^
that would be unfortunate
Check when T17 acquired HLL and it all starts to make sense... They've been working on HLL:V the whole time. HLL gets minimum resources at this moment in my opinion to release the main cash cow.
where is the vietnam trailer they said was going to be today
For this game right?
Imagine waiting 2 weeks for a hotfix cuz your underground garries don't work
fair
noice,thanks
They're testing the tunnel spawns for Vietnam obv 😄
WW2 will still be worked on
i dont think this is true, especially when t17 paid SO MUCH for Hell Let Loose. why would they spend the 60m only to not care about the game and develop a new game, one which they didn't need the HLL license for?
I sure hope
Why tf does an American boat have twin ma duece 50 cals with AA sights??
With hell let loose Vietnam coming out. I could finally be paranoid for real when I’m playing one in the maps
When is HLLV beta
Wasnt it "only" 44M?
whether HLL:V is successful (functional) or not, it's going to have a big negative hit to the player count of HLL both at release and going forward, since people will see it as the sequel, the same way nobody buys old Battlefield games anymore (especially if they don't lower the price of HLL back down to something reasonable!!)
they acquired the codebase and maybe part of the team too and so on it's not just the game
Is it so like in hll ww2 in hllv that you have designated chopper teams? So gunner and pilots on same squad?
That’s simple freedom
double the 50s double the fun
thats 100% more bullet per bullet
Literally nobody knows anything other than "HLL in Vietnam"
Aaaaw😭😭
That heli in the trailer was moving hella slow brother. Wtf. And literally just boomba after 1 arpg like a recon tank animation
Hey guys quick question:
Do you guys think that every maps strengths and weaknesses have more to do with winning then playing around what points you have to attack/defend is?
I.e., on SMDM, if Cattlesheds isn't a point, would putting up a garrison to control the middle of the map effect winning-odds or no?
it was a combination purchase price and acquistion agreements over the next 2 years or something
the total value was estimated at 60ish m
You guys always asked for mortars in the game; they added them, just in the wrong game. 😂
😭
And carrying revive system and double barrel shotguns. And and and rpgs
its very frustraiting indeed
Thanks Ben 
i think the dudes who are thinking "finally, realism!" are going to be disappointed. it's going to be like HLL in Vietnam. Slightly more involved than a battlefield game, but still accessible for regular gamers to have fun
Hyped for Vietnam
HLL:V is being built on the UE5, gg boys
realism players are cringe man
But why that heli so slow?
I wont be happy about it until they make the ww2 game actually good
GG crash fest
I have a feeling that the gameplay is going to be actually worse than HLL WW2? Just because of the whole setting of that war
Ben if you're around can you atleast give a wee hint about the next ww2 update
its not gonna be juno beach is it...
there's a very real possibility
Cuz nva has Cas right
Bushes and automatic weapons everywhere
Ben’s gonna drop the pacific front next update for Christmas
They should have just done the Pacific honestly
you take the best (worst) maps in hll with all the foliage and bushes, give everyone full auto guns with hll really good (Terrible) gunplay and recoil and there you have a HLL game in vietnam
so you just need a rocket to destroy an heli. i can already see the complains. its over for this chat
Vietnam battlefields won't allow the sort of variety that HLL does
You think it’s going be worse because of the setting, I know that it’s going to be horrible considering an unreliable dev team is making the game and they’re doing it on the unreal engine
They can't push a hotfix in a timely manner. Game is cooked brother
Impossible to balance without butchering historical accuracy completely
im concerned about tanking and logistics not being as good
I mean yeah but what matters is fun sometimes
M30 Drilling from the Luftwaffe?
you hate Hill400 and Hurtgen? Here, have a whole game of that
Historical accuracy is part of the fun
I wonder if they’ll stick with the supplies system or change it entirely
I know I like it too but you gotta make sacrifices along the way
It's weird how there's never been a WW2 Pacific Front game because of this
for pete's sake soviets and brits need way more content before they even think for a milisecond about the pacific or any other damn US map
At some point the sacrifices will be too big
Trve
If I remeber right the maps wont be as accurate as in HLL, so they will make stuff up to balance it....
Surely that cant go wrong
It looks really dumbed down. Idk maybe the fps stutters? Not the worst trailer ever
The whole war was about that so I doubt it'll be better than that
me in HLL seeing fourteen silhouttes move behind a pair of bushes before I get decimated by 14 automatics
vietnam ^^
honestly i hope so. id rather have more ways to have fun than MUH ACCURASEE
in ww2 you kinda have more fun given its a lot more variety in terrain
That’s the average Kursk game
Korean War game would be dope tho
Or how about this… just add Korea to HLL
You already have the weapons
Just make the map and the Chinese/Koreans
Missed opportunity. Also I don't think there are that many games or media at all about that war. And balancing would be closer to HLL WW2
It's post ww2 so idk. Plus no tanks
Caveman HLL, would love my “heavy tank” to be a mammoth
"Vietnam" might be better as "a set of maps" rather than a whole game, honestly
Trvke?!!?!
Almost everything used in Korea was used in ww2 or developed near the end of ww2 except the jet fighters
Nobody talks about it much but a Korean War game might not be marketable in China
something something pa - cifi -c the - atre
Korean war game wouldnt sell as well as vietnam
vietnam already isnt super popular in europe as far as I know
there were definitely tanks in Korea. what makes you think otherwise?
Well
Too bad
Lol ok bud
Yeah me too but that's the world we live in
Squad was effectively banned in mainland China for the faction choices
HLL has a significant Chinese player base, it's business
It's difficult to have an 'accurate' battle map as unlike WW2 where the battles were set is a specific area, a lot of the battles that were fought ranged all over the country. Specific Operations however are being utilised as part of the development process I believe 🙂
China got there arses handed to themselves. Doubt it'll be made
tell us the next ww2 map ben 🔪
T17 does enough business in the Chinese market that they'll never touch anything even close to the subject

? There were t-34s, Shermans, Pershings
I swear if its juno beach 💔
Battle of Berlin and with that, the end of HLL
Same thing with enlisted
New non-desert british map required
Ahh yes the Chinese captured t34s yess yess this happened
lmao
Is there a reason why we never got early war maps?
hoping for caen but there is a none 0% chance its juno
which is a weird choice because its the canadians and not the brits even if the equipment was near identical it will annoy me
Good im tired of chinese players friendly firing me without any reason
Probably to keep the loadouts consistent
Plus the early-war loadouts wouldnt market as well
T17 hears you and thgen gladly takes Chinese currency
You still bought and play HLL
I mean they're the same loadouts as the Africa maps save for the tanks
not really sure what Muph is going on about. just a quick google would have told you what some of us know as common knowledge
Operation Barbarossa would be awesome to see
The african loadouts came later
Fortress Harz in lower saxony, i´ve some old maps from some positions from the Wehrmacht
I’m just saying, an stg - 44 in 1941 is very anachronistic but you gotta cut some costs every once and a while to make it playable as a whole
I'd want to see subfactions before we get any early war maps
I dont want germans invading france with stg44s in 1940
Bc I'm right? The main battle involved no tanks brother. It was just a convoy
Well, but we could still get early war maps now, I don't know what's stopping them
the game is decently historically accurate
eah
You will storm Stonne with your StG 44 and you will like it
You're asking a lot of a dev team that doesn't even test what they make now
but you aren't right, though. There were loads of tanks serving in Korea on both sides
they could very easily make an eastern front germany faction to better match against the soviets
all you have to do is look it up
remove some of the out of place tanks and guns and add g41 and panzerbusche and voila
We talking bout the Korean War brother. China vs merica
Which tanks are out of place in the eastern front?
Panther
idk about all maps but the tiger and I think the panther
realism players when their characters left boot is slightly off colour than the boot irl
But do the soviets get their IS-1s?
its just stg 44s in 1940 aren’t a problem as its a game and thats what matters
Cod ww2 called
They simply shouldn't be there
when HLL first released, there were huge fights on discord over the HISTORICAL ACCURACY of the Thompson's friggin SIGHTS
ppl got tilted over that
I don't want STG-44s in 1940 honestly
This isn’t bf1 where a russian peasant is wielding a BAR automatic rifle
Based
Luchs never made it to the eastern front
Tanks could very easily be map based rather than purely tied to the faction
Me neither, but how will we balance the german load out
We don't mention s44 in here brother
who the f cares if the gunsight is wider? ITS A SIGHT
it feels like a pinnacle of german weaponry in game
Bah scrap the rat
To be fair only 100 were ever made and IDK why BM chose such a rare variant of the pz2
Same with the IS-1
They gave the thompson berating when the M1 sights are in accurate as well but those are for balancing reasons
Kars and MP40s, they'd be battling against the British anyways, what's the problem?
i wish the Luchs never made it to this GAME. it's useless. especially when the russian light and US light and british light can all kill other tanks
because BM have made a lot of weird choices
remember the british when they first came out
the PUMA is more useful than the luchs
Lanchesters 😄
I was kinda talking about france
Lanchesters, P14s being ""standard issue""
Well, now after U19 where US bazookas go through everything
but yeah still i guess
Different guns and tanks being available on different maps makes those maps more unique
theres no reason to have a 1940 invasion of france map if everyone is kitted out in 1944 gear
remember when the Firefly was very clearly just old BM code they had sitting around because it performed like the way Shermans used to perform in a prior update?
Don't forget the French and Benelux
its very apparent that initial British update was nothing more than the code that BM had finished for their planned British update
that was my first warning sign that t17 were in way over their heads
Did they have even worse stuff than Kars and MP40s
I still dont know who is to blame for that update, people are quick to point the finger at T17 but even then BM were not perfect, I can believe them farting that out before they take their money and run to make their nepoleonic survival pvp pve extraction horror shooter™
I am in favor of adding the Maus. Six tank crew members, ergo another new squad.
BM didnt have decades of game dev experience
you 100% blame t17. BM had already been working on that British update slowly for months, and then T17 decided to release that code after tying up some loose ends
I cannot facepalm harder at this reddit-tier "akshualee" moment
that wasnt gameplay footage at all :}
so was it BM to blame for the terrible map and weapon choice or is that all on T17 too
like i said gameplay never looks like that man
Idk how in depth T17 were on decision making but would they really tell BM what specific guns to put into the game and get it so unbelievably wrong
Not even the MP 40 that much, actually. Mostly K98k, MP 38s and MP 34(ö)s.
that's the reality of a widespread publisher, the studio they have working on HLL isn't some team of industry veterans
Felt like I was watching the trailer again
Kinda true lol
BM left them an unfinished product that they had been working on for ages. the new owner came in, saw that, and said "We need to start recouping our massive investment we need to drive some sales so lets release this as a major update"
that's ALL on t17 man.
So who'd have the worst guns?
T17 of course pushed the update, but the assets were made by BM, the maps the guns the character models
they made them in the first place, yes T17 could be to blame for not changing them but BM were the ones that added them to begin with
T17's crowning achievement post-purchase was actually fixing the loadout bug that BM couldn't
this is true lol
? Nobody?
Remember that?
every garbage update we've gotten in the last 2-3 years stems from t17 needing to quickly start making money on HLL that they paid WAAAAAAAAAAAY too much for
i have a feeling when first day of launch comes its gonna be hella laggy, buggy and unplayable
Someone was saying that balancing would be a problem
rushed updates to drive steam or EGS sales
invasion of france would be somewhat balanced I'd think, only thing would be tanks I'd assume but even then its early war tanks vs early war AT
That's what I thought
new trailer for HLL Vietnam is awesome.. I can't wait for its release
If you actually use historically accurate loadouts (so everyone gets bolt-action rifles with a few MGs and SMGs in between), it would be pretty even. Naturally, that won't work with HLL's playerbase because they are just not patient or skilled enough to efficiently use a bolt-action rifle
this game was doomed the moment that BM sold it. as, quite frankly, amatuer as BM was they weren't churning out total trash
bolt actions do just need improving in the current game anyways slower than they need to be
Eh, the French S35 and B1 would be very tough to crack.
the m38 mosin for whatever reason is actually the fastest bolt action in the game
the bolt actions just feel horrible to use
t17 however HAD to churn out content as fast as they could and didn't even QA it like you normally would because they had to make money or else
they'd probably make more money on HLL if they didn't jack the price up to $50
the game is designed for semi autos
theres a bit of a needless delay between firing and bolting, go in the range and use the m38 mosin, it feels way better to shoot because it doesnt have that delay
They're actually pretty good weapons. Unless they're British
its always on sale
pretty wild to see what the HLL community has been asking for in that trailer (mortar crew) and then they give us these SPA things that are absolute 🗑️
the british bolt actions are awesome now after the brits got tweaked
Really?
for a higher price tag than it cost after the price was increased after the game was released
They are my favourites, they still need to be faster tho 
I haven't played with that faction for like more than a year
people downplay the british weapons too much
bren might be one of the best MGs in the game if you can deal with the top loaded mag being a bit obstructive
Yes the British guns are genuinely good
and I am going to say something very unpopular
i like them more than the fing kar98
30 rds of wiping out your squad from 200m away with no tracers to betray my location
plus you can aim without needing to bipod and the recoil is very low
Soviet M38 best rifle in the game
but i cannot hit ANYTHING with the k98 under 100m
The fact that a Vietnam game gets mortars but a ww2 one doesn’t is the dumbest thing I’ve ever seen.
It would be nice to see but in Vietnam they didn’t have artillery like ww2 it wasn’t as common during ww2 either
i miss EVERY TIME
kar98k is fine, like I keep saying its pointlessly slow in HLL and could be faster
its cheap, easy to get for 15 bucks
when you wait it even goes below 10
Panic attacks on your end
the lee enfields should defintiely be the fastest bolt actions tho, that plus 10 round mags I think would fill the void of no semi autos
I like bolt actions. I think they could have more popularity. That's why I'd like early war maps
not really a great business plan when the game is bleeding players and you want to recoup your investment
i have no problem killing ppl from far or close in with the mosins and brit bolts
British loadouts also are much better balanced I think, the grenadier for assault for brits gets a bolt action while every other faction that loadout is a literal straight upgrade to the standard loadout
its normal, game is clearly at end of life
brits get way more bolt actions that the other factions and I think the others should follow in their footsteps
though US obviously get the m1 garand advantage
Why does the Soviet arty support player get the old-ass 1891 variant of the Mosin in the tank? 😄
Same here
I had the game wishlisted for 3 years and once it raised to $50, at end of life for some reason as you say, it only went under $30 once - and I bought it
I hate how most of the classes seemingly have no impact on the game all that much
Cause BM were dumb and put it in the game and T17 don't have the stones to remove it
idk they must have remembered it was in the game since its was only on the default rifleman loadout lol
that gun honestly should just get removed its terrible
they bought an EOL game with a declining playerbase, and increased the price, I'm not sure how that's defensible
t17 sells to many platforms, you can get a steam key elsewere (and no im not talking about ilegit stuff)
I dont think anyone would miss it, if the m38 is objectively one of the best bolt actions in the game
the 1891 is hands down the worst
and we've all been paying the price for that decision since
it wasn't rasied to $50 when they bought it, to be fair
Can someone tell me a genuine reason why Mortars aren’t possible in the original HLL but it is in the new Vietnam one? It makes little to no sense to me.
The fact that the Vietnam game is getting it just speaks volumes. There’s no excuse as to why it isn’t possible in the original.
but shortly afterward
i dont recall the price history of this game honestly, because ive owned it ever since late 2019
but i do know its been on sale for 30 USD many many many times
No, I mean the M38 short Mosin is already in the game yet T17 gave the 3 classes all the long rifles except the most appropriate one
and sometimes even below 20 during big sales
The 1891/30 was the most issued rifle in the soviet arsenal during WW2 and the basic soviet Rifleman gets a hand me down relic from the first world war
Yeah I'm agreeing with you
Yeah it's odd
I want to see the M38 more
oh they are 100% possible in the ww2 game T17 are just a bit silly
I wouldnt be surprised if they do end up adding them anyways so we just get more artillery lol
Hello chat
I do think the Bren is basically a tradeoff STG, bigger mag and a bipod, but awful ironsights
i feel sorry for the ppl just discovering HLL for the first time now
finding this fun game
Bren sights are fine
that's bleeding players
Rework SPAs into assault guns, add mortars, take away HQ arty, i don't care if people whine
the sights themself are fine its the big mag thats the issue
they're accurate, but they're not fine
Not that much of an issue
Just don't look right
It's a long-range weapon
it used to be WORSE when the brit update first happened
oh trust me I remember
I wouldn't change them, but visibility when ADS is atrocious
it was unusable! lol
no bipod for the bren, the sights were tighter and the weapon sway fsr was extra strong
They released the Bren with no functional bipod btw 😄
literally could aim when moving
:<
<BAR>
BAR didnt have a visual bipod, Bren did
I will still die on the hill that the BAR should only have a bipod on the machine gunner role
and the FG42 should be moved to machine gunner too
and that automatic rifleman should probably just be removed tbh
when i first started playing this game, my first big WOW moment was with the BAR on SMDM spawn camping a garry
which i didnt realize i was doing
i just kept seeing inf running in a line in a break in some bushes next to the road at Gardens on SMDM
and kept pumping lead into the break
HLL really is that spongebob crabby patty made from grey sludge
@fluid pawn in your Telegram you are adressing the hotfix for console. Did you know what is with the Pc version are we able to get a working game again? Or did we have to wait for another Hotfix ?
the PC game is working
what specific issue have you been having?
outside of a couple of UE4 crashes, ive been seeding every day for several hours since the last update and mostly been fine
Fun broken game yes lol
It’s that simple lmao
I don’t understand how it’s so hard.
Sadly Not. Massiv Rubberbanding and a full list of Bugs and Reports you can Read in this Thread
https://discord.com/channels/316459644476456962/1447327266064306279
I really wish they’d have done it properly then I wouldn’t have anything to complain about
the thing is, not everyone is experiencing all of these. it's not like post u18 when we couldn't play the game for 2 weeks
or like ps5 where the LOD is broken beyond 20m
The only thing broken now is what they did with AT and giving them 3 rockets...
there i was lucky and without Problems now its mainly the Vehicles but i talk with a lot People who arent able to play with all these bugs 😄
as far as rubberbanding goes, ive seen it yeah but only in a few matches where it was kinda bad
the U18 issues also didn't affect everybody, I know plenty of people that said the same thing, u18 was fine and they were playing as normal
regarding AT buffs, where is the AT rifle buff, like atleast give it less drop off or something idk
either that or give us weapon sighting
the tanker has entered the chat!
I just unlocked mg42. Is mg42 better or Mg 32?
Any update on when these damn graphics are going to be fixed? It’s just unplayable right now
by far.
42 is definitely better but they are both similar
Tysm, but 32 has like 4 more mags…
you wont run out
the mg42 is a laser rifle compared to the 34
Oh wow tysm
Last Sunday at 8pm German Time the ECL and Comp Friendly Matches are all broken and on Monday 8pm German Time the Mondaze Event was so laggy that the Game has had overtime of 30min
Alright!
the mg42 has like 250 rounds I think, stuffed in that little 50 round drum
8 better
I had the most fun game today, I was in a soviet map and playing defensive with a machine gun on a rooftop. It was insane
Some people prefer the slower fire rate. But in general terms there are not many reasons for why you wouldn't choose the MG-42
When you are able to play the Mg 42 do it its a beast and a Laserpointer i love this gun and you can go absolutly WIld with it
Alright tysm everyone
just wait till you get MG on omaha or utah US offensive
?
the way to use the mg42 is short 'spit' bursts unless you are using it mainly to supress. you'll likely get headshot before you run out of ammo. once you open up with it, everyone in 100m knows where you are
Oh wow-
42-34
😭😭😭
lol awesome. yeah people tend to never look up in this game. 90% of the OMG CHEATERS claims happen because someone was smart enough to grab elevation
I’ve been getting around 15 kills a game, after maybe 100 hours of gameplay. What is the average per game?
Have they fixed the Stuart yet?
When are they gonna releasw the minimum requirementa for Vietnam?
as Mg?
Average I'd guess and say like 30 on a good day
lol 😭, high ground and machine gun is op fr
for MG if you get a real good spot you can get a lot more than 30
Oh wow that’s cool
there really isn't an average , and I would encourage you to NOT think about the game in terms of kill counts.
More about teamwork? And objective?
yes
I got like 60 kills with an MG42 on Kharkov in a very short ammount of time when joining a match late
AS Mg average is 60 but in some Rounds with the right spot you can go ver 100+
Depends on the player. You eventually learn the maps and all the hit spots and you will be dropping 50 consistently
Woah-
Kills doesnt matter when the enemy still have all his 8 garrisons
Ahh I rly gtg, tysm everyone 🥹
That is why i get mad when the team recon is not taking garrisons down and is frontal attacking
killing dudes is fun, but the objective is to take or hold territory, and keep the enemy from spawning.
Machine gunners would be key for that actually. But most don't play as they should
But that needs a lot of Time the right settings and you must know the Spots and a lot of Map Knowledge. SO dont fell sad when you´r not there and keep Grinding 🙂 the first 1000h of Hell are the Tutorial 😄
its sometimes better to pass up on the kills if it would reveal your position, and observe where the enemy is coming from or where they are going and cutting them off or getting their spawn
imagine having 8 garrisons :<
NOOOOO 😄 You Play Mg not for the Kills you play it to keep you Area Clear when someone is running kill him when you see a Gary ping it and farm it as long as you can before your Team will destroy it 😄
Should have me as a commander. You’d get 8 garries and 2 half tracks guaranteed.
Until recon gets annoying lol
Lots of nice recycled assets and animations in the Vietnam trailer. 🔥 🔥 🔥
Would be impossible for an enemy to entwr a point if all squad mschine gunners are inside while tje rest are attacking but thst only happens in my dr3ams
it's impossible to have MGs covering all points of entry on most strong points
defending the point?
best I can do for you is one garrison placed right on the strong point and no backups and all infantry players attacking
MGs better used around the field where they have good lines of sight or to suppress spawns
YOu need booth you need 3-4 Mg Players and the rest should be pushing and defending
gotta press W to win bro
unless you are playing offensive, its a bad idea to have too many ppl defending from inside a strong point anyways
all about that map control init
even on offensive its good to spread out
cover as much ground to buy yourself more time
if you dont fan out and control the cap sector and rid it of spawns, you'll just get surrounded, can't get out, and you will eventually lose it when tanks start HEing all the buildings and arty comes down along with a BR
but most of you here already know this, more for the new guys
the biggest losing combo in this game is people turtling on defense and respawning over and over in the strong point. enemy takes out your backup garries and then you have nowhere else to spawn on defense to break out of it
second biggest being everyone attacking lol
map control first, attack second
1k hour is diabolical 😭
Theres very little reason to be in a strong point if you’ve got the sector occupied
big reason I think warfare is a terrible mode for casual
unless command has tight control on the squad leaders and squad leaders have tight control on their own squad everyone just ends up way too spread out and trying to attack
no one wants to defend a point when no one is attacking it, but as soon as one team lowers their defenses it just takes one guy to run through the back lines and destroy garrisons and flip the match on its head
Im at 4500
I'd watch the new trailer but I'm afraid it will crash my computer.
Let me ask you a question. What is grass?
Anyone still placing a Garry or OPs within an SP is also telling how little they know, and their lack of foresight
What color is the sky
skybox you mean?
…
Any devs or community managers want to come play in a tank for a few rounds in pubs? @fluid pawn I'll even get you VIP.
What time? Got a gym session booked in 35 mins for an hour however could be free after that
Any time. I can make myself free just for you
add me
Pretty common tbf
I play on console and I am not currently looking for anyone to play with. Ask in #pc-looking-for-unit
I mean if I’m a dev for a game, I don’t exactly fancy playing it LOADS lol
ah i see
i dont think commanders really need tight control on their squad leaders - imo if the SLs are relying on the Commander for directions your game is in a bad state. SLs absolutely need control on the squads, though
its the commander's job to use resources and build backup garries. SLs have access to all the same info commanders do
Commander needs tight control of SLs
SL is the real 'commanding' role of this game
commander helps orginise and make sure the squads are where they should be
too many people play commander in this game like they are the ones giving the orders and that means a game rests on one guy
Warfare is the best mode. May the best team win. Offensive is for plebs
that's not how this game should be played
nah Warfare is glorified king of the hill
False
offensive works for casual because theres no mistaking what your team has to do
the commander is a support role
not false your team will win if the timer runs out and you hold the middle point
the entire match in theory is total filler if you dont take the HQ
Hll you can mostly get away with hive mentality.
But, you cannot have a cohesive strategy without a commander.
command uses resources to support his SLs in the field
SLs are the ones that make everything happen
Offensive is for small minded people who can’t read a map or react
well thats why its better for casual lol
you dont need the commander to provide the cohesion, though. The SLs can do that themselves
there's not much to this game strat-wise
They can't, by definition.
Being casual means not having basic situational awareness?
no im saying most people in casual lack basic situational awareness
That being said, hive mind is mostly adequate for playing the game
offensive also sucks it has its issues, I think the premise of warfare is good it just needs some improvements, the same as offensive
yes they can. They have access to all the same info on the map, they have access to the same communication channel that the commander does
the commander calls in resources to facilitate all that
offensive is good for casual because it doesnt require as much tight communication and tactics, you cant always get that in a pub match
Anything more complicated that move in a b line to the strong point is impossible without a commander
offensive matches in casual are far more consistent than warfare
sorry @nova pivot the chat moved. replied to the wrong comment
Hi Ben, can you please confirm whether the graphical changes to Hill 400 are a bug or intentional. The textures on the terrain and all foliage were removed.
🤣
It's okay
what can the commander do that the SLs can't? Asides from managing resources. that's really all the commander has to do. He doesn't have to be THE ONE that comes up with the game plan
as long as SLs are doing what they are supposed to do
and its not like the commander can FORCE SLs who are f'ing around to not f around
Because he doesn't have to manage a squad, his mental bandwidth is free to keep track of the bigger picture.
If he is the one in charge he doesn't have to consider anyone else's plans other than his own
but the SLs can do that. and there's no guarantee that the SLs will even listen to hte commander
Allowing him to have a cohesive vision for how to manage momentum
what you are describing is the "Commander issues commands" understanding of how the command role works I was talking about earlier. Which puts the success or failure of the game on ONE player on each team
A Single SL only has an impact in one specific area when he makes a decision.
The commander can influence the whole map
the commander has map influence via resource management
not because he tells ppl what to do, because those people might not even do it
or some might just ignore him straight up
There's 3 parts to success.
Good commander
Good SL.
Being able to effing shoot the enemy
If you're missing the last one you cannot win
Regardless
a good commander doesn't have to put together the strategy
a good commander uses resources wisely and keeps garries up
Cashier commander model = lame
This is true, but one that does put together the strategy will beat the one who doesn't all else is eaual
Command
The vietnam side is getting woman soldiers right?
Like I said, hive mind is mostly adequate
Shut it chum
But I wanna be a manly man 🥺
If SLs are relying on the commanders word to figure out what needs to be done, that team is a failure and deserves to lose
as long as your SLs are talking to each other in command chat they can work it out. You don't need the commander to tell you to get back on defense. you don't need the commander to order you around. Especially when the commander has no mechanism to even ensure compliance. He can't assign squads to do things or impose his will
Imagine the scenario, where you're down to your last garrison, and your whole team decides to spawn off the red garrison. If you're a submissive commander you can only watch like the ck that you are.
“What do we need to do?” SLs, are the worst players
But Sir, we have no one defending. Who is defending, Sir?
If they aren't, the commander needs to manage them
And every match for greater coordination and strategy the commander absolutely should be commanding
Sir please assign someone to defend
this isn't strategy, though. this is common game sense you are talking about
I'll take it over non-communicating letter moving about my map
and even if I, as the commander, shout at everyone to get back on defense, i have no way of making that actually happen. its all up to the SLs
..unless i take down the red garrry lol
I've not lost a match this year as commander, exclusively comp matches and mixed events.
My instructions for mixed events are 'go to cap sector'.
I've seen commanders on the other team provide full action plans, and they still lose to the most base mechanic in capturing the point
Hll players will say communication is the most important aspect, while at the same time be unable to look at the map and see what gaps there are or be able to do something as simple as hitting their targets.
If you're team is cracked shooters it outweighs anything the commander can do
The worst part of the game as a new player is all the quiet muted SLs I have and the rest of the team. The best part is when my SL talks and strategizes along with other experienced ppl on our squad. The game really is 95% disorganization and rage inducing and 5% fun when we work as a unit.
Mixed events are... Mixed... It's generally supposed to be balanced
there's very little room for commanders to implement grand strategy in this game. Strategy on the commanders part really just stems from using resources, like timing the airhead and bombing run
Sure /s
the strategy in this game is basically just "map control. hit enemy on attack from more than one spot. Redeploy to hot garrisons to defend"
To be fair, most commanders use resources terribly. Even players at the top end of the skill level.
and your SLs can execute that. i don't need an action plan from a commander.
Youi're overthinking it
Assigning squads to specific tasks is important. Most SLs know what needs to be done but the "who" is important
If you have to depend on someone else telling you what needs to be done in this game, you’ve already lost.
You look at the map, and you physically go to the point that needs it. It is that simple. All this micromanagement in between is just noise
No one said you need an action plan.
I just said it's better if the commander has one
Yeah if an SL asks you what you need you might as well uninstall 🤡
Another six billion medium tanks for solo tankers please
Squads can do that on their own though. the commander doesn't HAVE to tell them
"we need someone on defense"
"fox will do it, we'll go back"
We're playing with the general public here
-rare quote
Not even that. But like, Strafing and bombing runs are absolutely useless in 99% of situations
Yet they're used all the time
the general public is even LESS likely to listen to a commander
So thje argument is if your team doesnt do everything they're supposed to do, dont bother helping them
that's not what i said at all
I swear the absolute most braindead players are still in here
When I'm playing an event, I float loads of resources, usually. I'll quite happily spam out supplies while sitting on 1000 munitions rather than use any abilities on cooldown
my whole time arguing this has been that the commander doesn't have to be the one responsible for strategizing, his main job is managing resources and building defensive garries. it's a support role to the squad leads
Just delete garrisons outside of cap sector and you'll win pub games
Bad commanders maybe
Oh man I will delete every single blueberry generator
If the tank squad is mute or a bunch of very low levels they will not get a heavy
the squad leads have all of the information the commander does, they talk to each other just as the commander does, in fact they have MORE info available to them because they also talk to their squads and can see their marks
"What is a chain of command?"
this isn't real life, its a game
This guy plays cashier commander
I have a gun
yeah, and if you TK on a community server your a** is getting banned
lmao
SLs have an enforcement mechanism
they can kick ppl from their squad
the commander cant kick anyone
Solid reason for not telling your team what to do 🧠
also, a Cashier Commander just gives everyone what they want. A commander who is managing resources effectively does not
SLs cooperating directly with other SLs to achieve a common goal is very difficult.
SL a needs to communicate the goal and how to achieve that goal and any steps in between to SL b is not impossible but takes a lot of bandwidth.
Having a level up to control both sla and slb is more efficient
If you want to have 3 SLs achieving one goal while doing three separate things it gets even more complicated
players are too stuck into this sort of roleplay where the commander is the one you look to for leadership
Im so glad the new arty squads can build nodes, perfect crew to handle it at match start
imagine putting it on the shoulders of IFACKEDURMOM34 who is a level 58 player who jumped into the command chair
Commander, can I shoot this enemy in front of me
You're a backseat driver aint ya?
Command chat is the leadership. All SLs and commander should work together to form a rough plan or at least an idea and then squad level works on the actual "how to do it"
in an ideal world at least
All I'm doing is describing basic military fact.
yeah and this isn't the military
its not a job
its a video game
the worst commanders are the ones that think they are the boss and are barking orders at everyone who may or may not follow them
it's a game meant to represent war and the specific game has tactical aspect that require teamwork else you get 50 flailing goofballs
It shouldn't be military levels of strict but there should still be some level of structure to have the most fun and make the game go smoothly
And people wanna be like "hurr but you don't need a commander"
You place a spawnpoint near whatever point you want to take, then blob in as a team to take it.
It’s not that deep
its a much better time for everyone if the commander manages resources, builds garries, updates marks when he can, and lets squads do their thing. SLs should work out amongst themselves who is doing what
Blob crosses a field, set up defense mows it down
Bad defense gets blobbed and isn't fun
this is a game, and it should be fun and people should just be allowed to play and not have some middle manager dude micromanaging
like i said before. people approach the commander role like its a job or like its real life when its a video game
I see fun in working toward winning with other people who also want to work toward it together. I only have a problem when every single person wants to Rambo their way through it all
you people sure like putting words in other's mouths when you are losing an argument
if you want to One Man Army, this really isn't the game unless you catch everyone unaware
the commander is neccessary to manage resources and build garries
he's not necessary to come up with the plan to win the game.
Most of those who advocate that “teamwork is everything!” in hll don’t realize that this “teamwork” really just means simply being in proximity of teammates and blobbing into whatever point you want to take or hold. The micromanagement in between is just noise
the command chat as a whole should be doing that
Command can only build garrisons well if the team defends him well enough and has map control
If Commander is this easy I will jump on it with just about 9 days of experience.
sadly that doesnt translate to pubs
it really IS easier than people think
Command is easy if you have smart SLs. Without any other smart person, you're just herding cats after you sprayed them with water
And people wanna be like "hurr but you don't need a commander"
I see mostly unorganized squads most of the time. That is why i'm looking for a clan. Too much variance playing with randoms
Never seen or heard someone say we don't need one. Everyone moans about not having one but no one steps up because command chat isn't being helpful
british still clip inside each other in the transport truck even after all this time
No one wants to be command because everyone shoves all responsibility on them instead of realizing SL is also leadership and not just "I have my own spawn point yay"
sounds lewd
its freakish body horror
Yeah I wanna get inside another british man
so maybe lewd if ur into that stuff ig
I only get upset if the SL is clearly just playing as normal infantry instead of doing SL things. Especially if I ask him to get a garrison and it's dead silent but 20 minutes later he's yelling at me for not building 14 new garrisons in 10 seconds
all while they ignore them and don't defend
Is like herding cats
They're too refined to sit on the floor, breaking the laws of physics is better.
Honestly most people dont even check the map when they play lol
Is it just me or does British weapons have the worst sights ever? British army is so hard to use compared to anything else
Wow. Are you cheating on me
idk what it is about the new map but it feels pretty bad. It feels like its on rails. Like an on rail shooter
The best usage of AR is for flanking and scoutingoperations in enemy teretory
they arent that bad once you get used to them
lewis gun I dont even touch that one is just bad
Bren is a beast if you can get around the vision blocking mag
lol, historically it was good tho? Or? Idk
British weapons were definitely good irl
Try pressing a different button than W. You don't need to follow the lanes they created
weapon sights work differently irl than in a game because the human eye works differently when looking through physical objects to something on a screen
sights like the m1 garand's have a much smaller hole irl, they are widened in games for better visibility since they dont work the same on a screen than in person
sorry, forward on the stick* since you don't have a W on xbox
Yes. Give Ben VIP on glows tho
I want VIP everywhere too
had that once, it went away after a few refreshs
lol concept mixup
British sniper and the SMLE are great
Never tried the British sniper
Couldn't give a sh*t about vietnam, fix the ww2 game please.
Agreed
Local man gives his opinion despite no one asking for it.
Many such cases
English faction has the best firearms/kits on average
genuine lol at the mortar reveal
This game is so boring I spawn in die straight away to some guy laying down. Mid game for old people
It's called a learning curve. Try boot camp section if you're lost. Show's pretty cool mechanics you might not know
Might not wanna rush in immediately
Hell Let Loose is essentially call of duty if you play it right
Yes
I think the biggest problem with the british is they get more bolt action loadouts than the other factions
which I think is actually a good thing and other factions should do the same
Let me send you a video in DMs rq just to provide an example
lmao
FBI has been alterted to your location
Fact
The PIAT is broken
The SMLE is broken too
The bren is a ugly stg and the Thompson is solid
For that reason North Africa is the most balanced + historically accurate front
yep
though the DAK could definitely do with some g41s I think at least
and AT should get some tweaks, remove the PIAT and Panzerschrek and add the panzerbusche and some AT grenades
For real man
Did they think we would jump for joy with that
Feels like a joke
sent one intern to produce 4 new vehicle models and kludged the artillery projectile system onto the side instead of making 1 working mortar model and giving it to all factions
take an artillery squad and use it like recon. thank me later
not played the game loads, maybe 10 hours, but last time I played, the game had just become free on gamepass and 70% of the lobbies were just awful gampeass kids which kinda put me offthe game
I assume its betternow?
was wanting to get back into it
is it pretty dead?
it isn't dead, but some community servers are having a hard time filling up now when they didn't used to
ah I get you. Will probably redownload and hop back in
how easy it to findpeople whowill talk to you too?
Iremember enjoying the social aspect, only not many peopleever spoke in game
It's still on Gamepass
still on gamepass
Yay I just got my first 30 kill game with the m1 carbine
How do the devs manage to break so much stuff whenever they update the game
what's going on there
@worthy charm should I go answer questions from like 5 years ago again
I will stick a torpedo up your a**
Would I never say
I’ll take that as a yes
This would be cool indeed
I agree
6 years ago lmaoooo
Definitely coming took a while
Yep probably coming soon
@worthy charm Okay I’m done now
Back to the abyss
Into the shadow realm your soul goes
Can they drop this now? Freezing my buns off in Foy.
not anymore ofc. 😄
different dev team, different false promises 😏
2026
Big year
Huge, even
Some would say massive
Enormous, too
I thought that was supposed to be 2025... or 2024 even? 😄
They should shoot for a mid
November release
I have no idea when they drop. What was the date on that. Give you idea most likely. 🙁
about HLL:Vietnam trailer... I saw mortars, dragging - both things that were supposed to be in HLL too long time ago. I guess we'll never get them. 🙁
Humongous?
Colossal
Unintelligible one could say
A lot of people are saying monumental
I have heard immense too
Many would agree whopping
XL might be appropriate
12/26/2024 :/
So it may be around same time frame. 😉
That actually wasn't Ben. 😛
It was actually the Big G that said it.
I’m going to say no

thank you
Any testing spots available for HLL Vietnam?
You’ll have to message @main harness about that
when is horse being added to the game?
vietnam new footage looks amazing
thank you!!
ℹ️ AMD GPU Adrenelin Driver 25.12.1 WHQLℹ️
https://www.amd.com/en/resources/support-articles/release-notes/RN-RAD-WIN-25-12-1.html
It looks like vietnam got this washed out filter placed on top of it
needs dark greens and contrast it looks bright washed out and like some filter yellow filter on it
looks like a blurfest
So we going to get ticket system and more emphasis on medics in Vietnam?
teleports behind you in Vietnam
bright is good RS2 vietnam was bright and it catched the atmosphere very well
but this time it has a valid explaination!
wow that makes it so much better and fun!
ikr
Does anyone know how to refill the artillery gun? I can’t figure it out.
Its a bug
No it isn't a bug, you have to ask the commander to do it for you. He has an ability that refills it.
Oh ok. Didnt know…
It will be to the right of their map in the munitions section of their orders
Ok thanks
Do you need a screenshot of where it is or did your commander find it
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/blackmatter/hell-let-loose?ref=discovery
*This is a simulation of war... not an arcade arena shooter. *
Where has the simulation of war gone?
how can it be gone when it was never there?
the real simulation was the friends we made along the way
Are they just building old school Battlefield game in HLL setting? I'd take that
you mean the enemies
Take this little hotfix... And look our great amazing new (dlc) game!! 🤑🤑 ... and plz stfu I already said we will improve our old game! But have you seen the game trailer?
I’m getting on in a bit I’m on Xbox is it playable or is it just Smolensk with the main issues
2017 was almost 9 years ago... thats insane
Freaks me out a bit
i remember watchin that kickstarter when it first came out on youtube & being hyped for a realistic ww2 shooter
It was always advertised to be a true war simulation of ww2
Anyone else getting network error when connecting to online services? -.-
Hello there
Hi there
I am playing HLL on Linux and I was wondering if anybody heared if HLL Vietnam will also work on Linux. Unfortunately there was nothing in the FAQ about it
you mean the price? No clue
oh i see, tysm, chat gpt said 99 dollars wtf
or 50
but not confirmed
The more important question would be :
Will HLL Vietnam work at all.
Or even :
Will HLL Vietnam.
I play on linux as well and HLL works good for my needs, except for the bugs already present on Windows but I can't do anything about that.
I'm pretty sure it'll be way more than that
oh wow....
i got hell let loose for free
Base price for HLL is 70 €, so what makes you think their upcoming, latest game will be even cheaper lol
70????? in my country its like 50
€ on Steam
on epic games its like 50
ohh
Base game is 50, yeah
wait whats that-
ohh cosmetics, whats a dlc?
But again, I strongly doubt HLLV will be cheaper than that, most likely a bit more expensive
Downloadable Content
Extra content you have to buy, basically
HLL only features cosmetic DLCs, tho
Correct
Nah, that's good
i almsot enver get it lol
If it was unrestricted or if there were more, there would be too many snipers
Sniper is meant to be special
i guess, but the sights on nomral guns are so ahh sometimes (Im just bad and blind) I can only play with machien gun or sniper, nothing else
Sounds like a skill issue :b
In the settings you can change ads fov to the lowest on the slider and basically everything becomes a sniper
It won't
It won't what?
Be cheaper
I was talking about that with my friends yesterday and one said that if the game ends up being 5-10€ he'll buy it. Poor guy
ohh? you can change ads fov? thats allowed-??
Yes
It was added recently
Yep its in the game settings
Is the hotfix going live soon?
What time in the UK is it scheduled for? I’m on PST
Usually midday or early afternoon
1-3 hours
Server side in 10 mins from now, game update in 40 mins
As per communication to server owners
Amazing, thank you!
new map compared to old maps are night and day
New maps feels like on rails shooter
What did you like about old maps?
when i think vietnam i think of forrest gump movie. That color pallate would be perf
When I think Vietnam game, I instantly think
Graphics
Foliage : Low
Blocky bushes and trees everywhere
Gonna be awful. Getting shot from everywhere except for the places your eyes can see
All semiauto/burst/automatic guns
the openess/freedom. Idk what it is with new map maybe i just need to play it more
Still blurry on play station
Has t17 acknowledged large frame loss on Smolensk?
26 gb patch is crazy work
invest in ram before they skyrocket further fr
Back to Where Minds Meet! Hopefully I can return to my beloved Hell Let Loose soon…💔
We want u18 back now!
HLL: Mortain basically
Real
dare i say i enjoy mortain as a map
It almost feels like one of those situations where a company builds something up really awesome and once they get rich they just say nah f it we’ll just release whatever now that we have money. I feel scammed lol
so they didnt test the fix for PS5 by trying it on a PS5?
what they have been doing for the entire week? who approved this hotfix? How can this even possible
It's been great seeing so many people enjoying our newest map, Smolensk, as well as changes to artillery, SPAs and more.
I wish I could enjoy those new features too.
Thats right.. but I buy a good game, with good Comp community, two expensive servers. And now I have …. 💩 like this. Give me money back if you are not able to repair the game
yep right, game is broken for ps5
These past months have been really embarrasing for T17. When will they get it
Go play battlefield. 😂
Devs are literally spitting at players faces and saying it's raining XD Idk how can you guys still trust them and believe they care about anything related to this game, other than the money they earn from the DLCs 😂
The KV2 152mm HE has the same radius as the P3 with the 75mm 🤡
They did not build it, they bought it...
I am pretty certain BM did most of the work on British forces and those maps and the game was on life support ever since as they probably started working on HLL: Vietnam.
Jan 2022 - Team17 teamed up with Black Matter and acquired HLL
Feb 2023 - The Black Matter Team stopped working for them a year after the acquisition
May 2023 - British forces with El Alamein & Driel
Dec 2023 - Skirmish
Feb 2024 - British refresh
April 2024 - Mortain
Oct 2024 - PHL refresh
Nov 2024 - Elsenborn, dynamic wheater, freelook, VOIP
Apr 2025 - Tobruk, wheater system refresh, structures got nerfed
Oct 2025 - Stalingrad refresh, armor rework
Dec 2025 - Smolensk & SPA
Yeah I worded that terribly. I know they didnt build it lol.
remember when we've been told years ago that HLL will get mortars?
wasn't it even on an official roadmap?
seems like they're in HLL Vietnam
why did they rework arty in such a weird way when they could have just given us mortar squads? what most people have been asking for
especially when they're working on mortar anyways
or is this now just going to become a "Vietnam exclusive"?
May 2023 was the update when stutters struck for the first time if im not mistaken xd What a coincidence
everything what was asked for HLL is going to be implemented in HLL:V like mortars, dragging knocked down bodies, bayonets, grenade launchers etc
which is fine but surely they can also just add that to HLL then?
why even do extra work on SPAs when they could have just focused on doing mortars, serving both games
it's fine but that clearly shows they ve been focused on new project
I belive there are 2 diffrent studios with 2 diffrent budgets
Cool but nobody asked for Vietnam 😄 Wasn't it quite normal a long time ago that devs would simply release a Game 2, Game 3 as better and updated iteration of the previous game? People still bought it.
Yes!
yeah the performance issues started there
I also remember how every patch from that one on came with weird bugs on maps that weren't even mentioned in the patch notes
like when the graphics on all wheat fields on maps like SME would just glitch out
This is exactly why you should never forgot to buy HLL Vietnam, that will be the game of the year 2026
or the change of running speed which wasnt even mentioned in patch notes
Im gonna put in 500 orders then refund.
Yeah, each update made the game worse and worse, less fpses, more bugs, old bugs never fixed but it was playable, with all its downsides it was playable, now it's not XD
I am worried that this level of incompetency is going to push people more and more into some EU consumer protection regulations.
Bring back sprint speed
and then they had to fix movement for the next like 3 patches (with stuff like sliding into prone without a cooldown)
they then spent a lot of time explaining how they completely changed the locomotion
tbh I still don't think it's actually better than what we had before all of this
I still regularly have to jump multiple times over the same fence
the most hilarious thing looking back is their original road map right when they took over, so much stuff was announced. couple of months later they reduced that roadmap to like 10% of the original one 
imagine them sticking to a year of the war
boring
poles