#mess-hall
1 messages · Page 209 of 1
Login day. 3pm
Who is in the lead?
Lol look at arc discord. There rolling back a horrible change. What do ya know. Impossible huh
Fake news ! Can't be done.
Arc r for nerds
Poe today
The yellow buildings in Kursk and stalingrad is really good, if you have a g43 it's a really good position
The ones that look like a normal house but no staircase and you have to mantle to the top
Horse
SPAs mentioned
Horse mentioned
Horse
Kedo died, you’ll have to find his alt
FG42 bipod when
why instagram though
Self-Propelled Artillery?????????????
@fluid pawn any news about consoles PTE?
It says steam only
I saw that the moment I wrote the message
It does in this announcement, but previously this year it was mentioned on a dev talk that this was cooking and it wasn't very difficult
Xbox already has a testing program for games and it was used for the server browser introduction
Sherman 105, nothing as new as they claim it to be, unfortunately
Smolenks is around the corner. Shouldnt the pte be out already?
How do you know it will the sherman ?
They only showed a pic of a sherman and we assumed it to be sherman 105, right?
It's both been leaked and later confirmed iirc
Oh, then it was just that?
My bad then, I thought it had been confirmed to be a 105
Not yet I'm afraid 
Ben come on man, tell us what vehicle that is
Hopefully soon 🙏
Iirc it wasnt confirmed at all. Ben even said that it was just a picture they gave him, right?
yessirrrr
We've not confirmed yet what will be added
Copy that
@wind vine luv your vids 😘
Thanks man! Much appreciated!
Any news on bar/fg42 bipods?
I'll find out next week 🫡
can you at least say if they will be asymmetric?
I'll try get that detail added into the blog post on Monday 🫡
it'd be a way to balance the factions a bit. since germans with 2 heavies is strong, an open topped SPA vulnerable to even AT-rifles would even out a match if soviet SPA was an enclosed, heavily armored SU-152 or such
BAR has had a bipod added in U17 I believe, though only for the machine gunner role (intentionally). FG42 remains a mistery.
You are one of the channels I actually stay for the whole video, really nice
Appreciate it a ton! They really take me a while to make but I see that it is worth it!
It’s definitely not added yet, I haven’t played a bit but last I heard they were confirmed working on both and said it’s coming hopefully by end of year iirc. There was a leaked image of the bar mounted but that’s it
And they said in a dev log it would only be for MG class
Goated videos can't lie 🐐
Hm you're right
I'm heading off for the weekend now folks, however will be back Monday to share more info on what's to come 🫡
Aaaaaaah stop lying Ben you only heard about my channel now lol
In the year 2025, why cant PTEs also involves consoles?
yeah microsoft & sony, why cant it?
Yeeah! 
the PTE already confuses many people on PC thinking that it's the actual game
That's just a test to see if you're smart enough to pick the correct game. If not consider COD instead jk 😄
maybe they should make the PTE a free installation (that is, no need to buy the game to try it) on both. free marketing and lots of clueless people playing the PTE thinking it's a F2P title
Is everyone happy about the PTE or did we find even more reasons to moan?
Im a simple man idk how it all works im jw why its exclusive to steam
steam usually lets game devs push almost any update. They need permission from the other platforms for any update. I assume this also applies to PTEs
^ this basically yeah
What’s the best way to troll on this game
Ahh word
that might work actually. But prob too much time between the PTEs
Please baby jesus just let the update work when it drops.
horse-drawn SPAs
SPA stands for stallion powered artillery
how getting burned by a flamethrower is an achivement?
Who ever thought of that is an idiot
Not many people have it, so it's rare to get killed by it tbf
Hi guys, I had been absent for 8 days due some important real life stuff and I see there were several posts about the hotfixes. So my question is... how is HLL doing tech-wise in relation to U18 problems? Any quick sum-up anybody 🙂 ? Were the "Fatal error!" crashes and server disconnects rly fixed?
and like a million pings and DMs wtf... it were just 8 days 😄 . But wow... -400 (Steam) players when looking at HLL Steam chart... 😬
First you would have to Let the guy get close, prepare the gun and then Wait for the flames to hit you (which Is like 0.3-0.6 secs depending on the distance)
why would that be an achievement? I fail to see how is that an accomplishment?
yea we seem to be back to the bad state before + flipping tanks with smokes :}
😫
You could say the tank got - smoked 😏
whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
noooooooooooo
(and noob commanders wasting all munitions on the now useless arty strikes:)
and I see on the public C-rcons for next map still listed as "unknown Warfare", I guess they didn't fix or help the C-rcon devs at all :/
But yes its "better" nnow
at least we get a U19 PTE
i cant wait to find you on 106, ping me :}
yeah, just reading U19 is getting delayed... makes sense
Its better like this
Maybe even do a patch 4 for performance
-# im living on copium
I doubt they will ever touch that... they haven't for so long (ever? 😄 ). I wish they removed the stuttering.
i think the perf got a bit worse, they probably only "fixed"it as much as needed
those are bad news then... what can be even worse? I wonder
I mean... even the pre-U18 stuttering alone is super bad
i have been only playing medic since the flip feature
Heresy
Mods smite this guy
i hope they fix that in U19 so it works on all vehicles
bring the PTE stuart back
I guess still no any real reason to play HLL now then... I will try this weekend, but I am leaving at the start of next week for another week+ away, so will be out of touch even more. Will be fully back roughly probably by the time when U19 gets out. I don't even want to read all the stuff, too much of it, no time.
Thanks for summing the things up guys 🙂 .
it fels like some good players didnt come back
Not like much happend
ofc thats just a feeling
I checked the Steam chart playerCounts and ... -400 in the last 30 days. Quite a deal.
i played a bunch of bf6 and it's completely dead. when measured with how much people talk
well... it's BF after all
it looks like it get incredibly boring after a few matches
BF brings nothing new ever. The last few ones were always just a reskin of the previous BF game.
gets boring fast
but that's just my feeling based on external observation, I never rly played it myself 😏
I kind of get the feeling too. Having played basically the same game on the 360, normal games just dont interest that much. In HLL though, you do meet all kinds of interesting people
like that one old guy i met in a tank who mentioned how his friend in the 80s had a real sherman
that's a reason to play hll
teleports behind your reason
But if the devs won't fix the bad stuff fast, 2026 may be the final year. We can chew through the in-game logic/UI bugs... but crashing, disconnectings and even worse performance are stuffs that will scare the players away always.
Noticing the crash report in #1430214896259436665 even after the latest hotfix... bad sign.
Maybe it'd be better if HLL suffered a horrible and sudden death, and vietnam took its place
splitting an already small playerbase between two games, one being ue4
With HLL gone, there's room for another 5 guys to make another WW2 game, eh
I would have nothing MP to play then. But then again, while there is HLL in the broken state still alive, it discourages other possible WWII MP games from developing.
So a sudden death would be probably for the better. I don't think that will happen though.
aaaah, you already wrote it... yep I think the same
Well, if T17 doesnt have backups to do a rollback, all it takes is one disaster or sabotage to end it all
This game is too popular to have a sudden death
yeah
but who knows... frequent crashes/disconnects and performance have their red lines too for the people
you guys know the origins of the word sabotage?
Yes
nope
I think it's from shoemakers who threw their wooden shoes into the new machines capable of producing shoes faster and more efficiently because they feared they'd lose their jobs to those machines
It comes from the French word sabot which means wooden shoe, I think
any machine, i read. one shoe from a disgruntled worker is all it took. and t17 doesnt sound like a nice workplace
Yep, just checked, pretty much any machine
Now that's far-fetched cope
Allright, thx for the chat guys 🙂 , I myself gtg., rly tired, this was a rly hard week work-wise, the next 2 ones will be the same as well. Will check in here sporadically later... maybe... but then again maybe not 🥶 . Too much of a bigger real life stuff going on now for me too.
nu-uh, this discord is more important
i imagine funny things, im fine either way
After yesterday im copium addicted
didnt help sadly
:}
HLL has the worst sounding third person Kar98 SFX I've heard of any game that has it.
If you're gonna have it objectively be the worst rifle in the game, at least make it sound good
Game is dead
4k in game. Yup, so dead.
L take fr.
Everyone’s playing squad
*44
Last time the player count was this low was in September 2020
So?
No, it was september of 2022
10k players according to steamcharts
I see 7923 players in between 23 and 24
Oh you were almost right. It's September 2021 actually
For some reason it doesn't show it correctly in the timeline
It's not looking good bruh
And what do you fear, exactly?
Im a little worried, but the numbers will pick up during the next update. Steam winter sale will help as well
Well the game has been bleeding players since January. Almost every month -10% players.
You're afraid of horses? 🤔
since june it leveled out a bit
Yes
Again, so? Playerbase is still active and stable
You don't see a problem losing 1/10 of the playerbase every month?
Nope because, like it's been pointed out already, it leveled out again
And I'm also not worried because this game is old and is soon getting a follow-up title
So nothing of this comes unexpectedly
I mean "peak" was January... becuase it was free for a week on Epic Game Store.
https://steamcharts.com/app/686810#All
I'm not pulling these stats out my a s s, you can check for yourself. in June there was a 3 % increase and since then the drop has been 13 %
That too, yep
That's wonderful, but doesn't contradict my previous statements
Your statement was that the playerbase is stable... But okay
in the past especially june of 2023 the player counts have been low
Stable as in on a level where you don't have to worry about finding populated servers
Poor choice of words on my part, admittedly
Yeah well imo something needs to be done. You can't just dig your head in the sand and say that everything is fine. Lowest playercount in 4 years
its the fear to end up lie s44
<@&365680483276816385> can we not realease a brand new update when u18 still has systemic issues? Let's get the game fixed and other bugs that have been there ages before a new map and vehicle type?
Understandable, but unjustified. HLL is way too popular and arcadey for that
Ban me for doing a bad job
and willes
Mods can't do anything about it lmfao
We have spots for feedback in #1432770693086445640 and #1425052819311955969 . We are not developers, just a moderators of the discord.
I work in a laboratory full time 
U19 is already being delayed and a third patch for U18 is currently in the works also. This PTE is just to gather some feedback on what's to come in U19.
This could have been your time for positive encouragement.
Tag a developer then - or do they have their head in sand?
Orrr just leave feedback where feedback can go.
Please dont tag staff.
I'm not gonna bother a dev. It's the weekend.
:}
Nah. Learn through suffering :)
put the feedback on the pile
Not like we could even bother a dev
Right, are there even devs here? lol
We just do what everyone does, cry and run to ben
Hidden amongst the people 🕵️
Plot twist, I'm a dev
Never ending pile
i think drew is secretly a dev
After u18 the devs are long gone
Nope, they're still around, doing things.
"things"
I don't work in video games. I dunno what each one is doing 😛
no one here has any idea about the devs i guess
are there even dedicated devs, how many, etc
studios nowadays tend to rotate devs between multiple projects
Ben confirmed this is whats happening
They have like 80 devs who work on both HLL and HLL:V at the same time
Happy halloween!!!1!1!!
and worms, and the other crazy games :}
True
btw i had no kids ring the bell this year, as it should be
Neither did I.... (We put a bowl out lol)
man, that winning screen was so peak
i expect them to not ring when there are no decorations
i got a smoke grenade next to my door
gonna flip your bmw if you do
Bricky mentioned
is HLL ok? haven't been able to play for a while
it's bugged for me but it's up to date patchwise
Bugged how?
it's up to date but doesn't show populated lobbies. I've verified game license, turned off filters and restarted the game to troubleshoot.. to no avail.
Ya mine does the same thing it says all the servers are empty
Clear download cache?
any dev on right now
to show him a bug?
I walk into area and from 120 fps goes to 29, as if limited to 29 fps
the 3rd time I walk there, no more 29 fps limit
cant post screenshot
Hell let loose is in her legal age
She’s drinking and she’s all over the place
Hell let loose is that one fat ugly chick who you never thought would amount, then years later she’s shed the weight and become a goth
Steamcharts are a good way to see a certain trend. However, what is not listed there are EPIC or Xbox (PC) players.
There is an unknown number that no one can really see. I was on a server one day where a good 80% of the players were from these platforms.
This tracks them on ~240 servers including some console servers. It counts matches played per player, so ignores bots and such but also isn't the same distinct player count as Steam charts https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1317135960588156978/1434098846526603284/image.png?ex=69071821&is=6905c6a1&hm=b6c22abd91b6e43d4f99f0a9ef2e2f7d9d22c83ccd9a394f754d02881da2f878
Is that something you made?
Where do the statistics come from?
The other question is how many of these servers are console servers?
The reason for the spike is free weekend and it’s on sale
Thank the Lord for battlefield 6, they all left
Now only real hell let loose players remain
Those of us too stubborn to go and those of us who are stupid enough to stay
I know someone who moved from PC hell let loose to console because and I quote “it stinks” unquote
There’s at least 1 clan member who’s suspicious probably into buying his weed off the deep web, he’s got that creepy vibe, you just can’t place your finger on it, every clan has that guy and he’s usually the hacker
Always runs AT even in comp and nothing else
He’s all software and no skill, a pig wearing makeup in other words
crcon data
Nice drifted from player statistics to alleged cheaters. You read about this every day on the Steam forum... and in 95% of cases, it turns out that they are playing on the official servers. Which aren't really moderated.
No I’ve experienced this first-hand on clan servers
The precision striked in HQ when we were moving opened my eyes
Sure you could say it was a recon squad though we were getting 40, snared an angle, going down-hill
Also before anyone says it was mines, no it weren’t because we were all watching every inch of the road and you could hear the plane very briefly
I would like to say something else about cheaters. If you take a quick look around the comp scene, you will quickly find one or two people who have already been banned from several games or even received VAC bans. The comp organizers allow a known cheater to participate. You can read all about it in the rules.
Otherwise, I don't think we need to talk about the fact that HLL's anti-cheat isn't really the best, when there are even providers who advertise that their cheats haven't been detected since their release.
That’s just the nature of competition, people one up each other, scum bag tactics? Brass knuckles in boxing gloves
It's the same issue as with the Nvidia filters, which are still usable today even though the developers have taken measures against them.
Tbf you don’t even need software, unfortunately you can white chat with someone on the enemy team
They gotta get rid of white chat all-together
Is Kronos still the biggest cheat system?
I’ll leave this clan anonymous though the guy I was talking about is very much real, he’s always AT and liked to joke about how he’s “switched on Kronos” I assumed he was using reverse psychology and was actually cheating and his jokes were coming out as sub conscious ticks
naah that would be dll injections
Speaking of injections, a work colleague of mine had his shots for covid and the flu and he looks like a waking corpse
If I die it’ll be because of the hell let comp deep state
Forget are 51, the comp community here goes even deeper
🐴
fuuuuh the uncanny regret
Smolensk looks good, I hope we can play it without crashing 😀
Is it possible to slamfire the m97 shotgun in the game?
is there a yt vid or guide for optimal settings in HLL for spotting enemies?
Sick of wondering where the f@#k you're being shot at from? In this video I cover some tips that will help you spot the enemy better in Hell Let Loose!
Buy Hell Let Loose here: https://www.fanatical.com/en/game/hell-let-loose?ref=mjq2ytv
Interested in being a part of an active and passionate community? Join my Discord server and come meet the ...
Pray 🙏
Horse
Are you also excited for Smolensk?
uhhh, the HLL wiki says that this game has Firefly, M4A1 and M4A3E2 75 but ive never seen them
also HLL wiki doesn't have the M4A3 75 which i've seen in game and practice range, is it outdated or smthn?
Because the Firefly has weaker armour and the Churchill is the better in-game tank
wouldn't firefly have a much better gun and mobility (or is that not the case in this game)
cus irl Firefly was a medium
Although any experienced crew will tell you the best in-game tank is the soviets IS-1 / T34
A 75 with a British pounder
?
Firefly had 17 Pounder
Churchill 7 had 75mm equal to that of normal Sherman
Yeah the 17 pounder was a British gun they fitted to the 75 Sherman
Mainly M4 and M4A4 variants
It was the best cannon of the war
along with other modifications such as radio in box out of turret
and no more hull mg
I’d argue the best tank of the war was the T-34; mass produced and in the end 50 tanks outbeat 1-5 Tigers
Better to send in 40-50 tanks, lose half and still Destroy the enemy’s 5 heavily armoured tanks
The only two things that you can’t replace is time and manpower
Game still dead?
hell no, T34 was horrible
Is that why the soviets won the war?
Smashed the Heights and cut a bloody path through Berlin?
tanks dont win wars
tanks help but arent the sole reason
also Germany is kinda overrated in WW2, they werent that strong
Germany could never beat USSR
That was their biggest mistake was invading the Soviet Union
the biggest mistake was starting the war in the first place
the could never invade the UK cus of the channel
They did give them a hell of a kicking, weren’t it like 8 million soviets dead ?
could never beat the USSR cus of its might
and if they prolonged eventually USA joins
mainly cus of poor tactics and logistical issues
USSR had very mid logistics
USA only joined because of pearl harbour
Guys give me something new. All of this is known
tru but Roosevelt was tryna find literally any excuse to join the war, eventually he'd have found a reason
It always takes a tragedy to push Americans to pro war
plus Germany always wanted to fight USA eventually
Both wars were banker wars
The Bilderberg group
cus Living Space or smthn they wanted world domination
German world domination is a myth
a myth they wanted it or a myth they could get it
They wanted to reclaim their older lost territories
(UK is not a lost terrirory)
(Operation Sealion and allat)
Hitler had nothing but admiration for the English
ye but he still wanted to invade
hence Operation Sealion
but he could never invade cus of the Navy and RAF and the fact they just didnt have the strength
Jersey is hardly England
he wanted to invade the actual mainland UK
The German barge fleet was just a budget d-day idea
hence why they planned to invade main UK (Operation Sealion)
but cancelled due to realising it wouldnt work
If we go back even further, the Germans in the First World War did almost win
Actually they were however far distance from Paris
back to this point, T34 was far from best tank of war
poor reliability, poor crew comfort, poor build quality
gears were very hard to shift through, armour prone to cracking to due heat treating to too high temperatures
sometimes had parts missing when arrived at front line
cramped
They were significantly better than the Tiger
i mean, the Tiger had much better crew comfort and was much better to use
Purely on the fact of the Tigers fuel consumption
the driver controls were similar to that of a car
it also had good sights, good turret handling
The early war Sherman’s were also terrible
ofc it was also unreliable and expensive
not really
And if hit at all, they’d explode because of the shell storing
same shell storing as every german tank btw (pz4, tiger and panther all had ammo stored in sponsons, just like early shermans)
i think T34 did also
Let’s not even get into French tanks
The French were still using horses to get around
very easy to repair, modify, reliable, could use multiple different engines and thus fuel, loved by USSR, good mobility gun and armour, all of which could be easily upgraded
good built quality, crew comfort
The soviets didn’t have Sherman’s
ADD THE MAUS
Lend Lease
they definitely did
mainly M4A2 cus of the diesel engine
Soviet Crew in a Sherman is the best tank setup
Germany also used a few shermans that they captured
i've seen photos of Shermans having their engines changed in a field in normandy not far from frontlines
i think one of them was called 'Hurricane' and was an M4
Isn’t the last surviving real king tiger in Australia?
think its in France no?
i saw it at Tankfest, appparently they imported it from France
it was driving and everything
Was it huge?
Beautiful beast
they had it go out with Tiger 131
I wouldn’t want to fight a tiger
so they had the last running Tiger 1 and last running Tiger 2 on show together
i wouldnt wanna fight any tank
I can’t believe the saving private Ryan tiger was a T//34
im armed with a kitchen knife and thats it
the only film with a real Tiger is Fury iirc
they used Tiger 131 in Fury
Wow really
ye
I thought it looked real
At first I thought it was just another T-34 with plates welded on
Then I saw it
iirc Tiger 131 was abandoned by crew in Tunisia after a 6 Pounder shell ricochet off the gun barrel into the roof jamming the turret drive, at which point they forgot to self destruct it
The only thing I dislike about Fury is the Tiger would never have moved if that were real
if you go to Tank Museum you can see the damage it took
- 2 of those 4 Shermans couldve killed it frontally pretty easily
That scene makes me laugh
Fury and the M4A1 had 76mm M1 which could pen Tiger pretty easily
the other 2, sure they had 75mm M3 so couldnt do nothing but at 76 bois couldve just killed it
iirc M93 APCR shell from 76mm M1 could pen like 240mm of RHA (enough to kill Tiger 2 frontally) but due to short supply of tungsten US crews never had any
M4A1 76W commander gets shot in face by 88
Was that his friend?
Overall the Panther was the best tank of the war
And yes, Germany was totally able to beat the USSR
If they started the offensive in May 1941 and pushed Moscow directly after the Battle of Smolensk
transmission intensifies
These issues were fixed later... Also remember other tanks of the era had many inital issues, including with the transmission...
iirc German scouts made it to outskirts of Moscow but main army was decently far away
also cost of production
- that doesnt mean issue didnt exist
- ease of modification and repair
As I said, if you consider a whole month more time and a different approach is was totally possible
also iirc Panther was more cramped than Tiger
Wasnt decently higher than a Panzer IV...
I see, we have someone here that fell for usual German tank myths
ig but who says capturing moscow beats the USSR, they could just relocate capital like they did with their factories
Same for your Sherman 😉
Yea, but it would have broken the back of the Soviets
oh ye also Panther gunner sights were permanently zoomed in
which would make it hard for the gunner to see what the commander sees
imo the Tiger was better than the Panther
ehh, tru
guess we'll never know for sure unless we have a time machine
Completely outdated against every German tank... Only in Africa they were somewhat effective against the Panzer III. It easily lit, had a high profile, and its only advantage was the high numbers
German tanks were better, both as an individual tank and how they were used if you look at the tactics,...
75mm M3 could easily kill pz4 and stug. it had good armour for time, good survivability, easy of repair, crew comfort, some variants had higher firepower and armour. easy to modify
reliable as well
Depends how you look on it. The Tigers had a better reputation among the crews, but the Panthers were what was needed more
also could use multiple engines so multiple fuel types
For 1942 against earlier Panzers
e.g. M4A2 was diesel but M4A3 was gasoline
also tank on tank combat was very rare
most tank combat was against infantry and AT guns
so saying this tank penetrates this tank means little
imo its bc Tiger had better crew comfort, easier to use (intuitive driver controls) and better sights
It was ok for the time it was introduced, but it was outclassed pretty fast. And considering the Germans developed something like the Panther and Tiger in the same timeframe, the US could do better
Wont help you if you still fight against a tank
US had the Atlantic as a constraint
in the very small chance
tank on tank combat comparisons dont rly mean much
Its not only your opinion, its also the opinion of the German crews
It still matters
yes, so thats why i think tiger is better than panther
not very much
what actually matters in tanks are things like logistics, how easy is it to use, make, repair and modify. stuff like that
If you look at a strategic level the Tiger was far less needed than the Panther
armour, gun and mobility come secondary to those factors
Not really
what good is a tank if you cant repair it after it hits a mine
Those are the first things considered when designing a new tank, even nowadays
or if the crew doesnt know how to use it
Crews can be trained
Also remember that you cannot really compare US and German tank design
what good is a tank if you dont have the resources to make it
Germany had less resources so their tanks needed to have a higher survivability
because they are the simplest
but not the most important
tank1 takes 1 week to train crew
tank2 takes a month to train to same level of skill
which is more ideal?
In the case of Germany the latter... German tank crews were experts with their vehicles
you completely misread the scenario
And you dont understand the idea behind German tanks and its design
tiger was designed as a breakthrough tank, i understand that pretty well
So why do you understand that and not my other statements?
ur saying that stuff like logistics dont matter as much as gun and armour
they matter, a lot more
Where have I said they dont matter?
also if we wanna go into the armour debate the Jumbo had more armour than the Panther
Yea cool
US tanks still were worse
also M93 shot from 76mm M1 could pen the front of a Tiger 2
US crews were less trained and less experienced
thats an issue with the training systems, not the tanks
Their tactics were worse
also germany had 3 years more time in the war
Crews belong to tanks
idk about that, Germany did lose in the end
other way around
And thinked about tanks when the US still usedthe FT17
What else would happen if you fight against three quarters of the world, including countries that have unlimited resources?
how is the use of the FT17 in any way related to the performance of the M4
i call that a tactical error to try engage that conflict
thats like running up to 5 guys in a field with MG42's when u have a M1 Carbine in HLL, a tactical error. you're never winning that
Germany had officers that considered tank warfare in the interwar years like Lutz and Guderian while the US only had a few light tanks and MG monsters that were in the cavalry (!)
dont see how thats related to if the M4 was good or not
As I said, its not only about the tanks itself, its about tactics too
your talking about interwar
tactics change between interwar and WW2
also dont see how this is related to your point of the Panther being better than the Sherman
Yep... And whilst Germany had officers that saw that you cant fight a modern war with tactics from the last one, US was still relying on horses and a few light tanks as their fast troops
As I said, tactics are far more decisive than the tank itself
dont see how this relates to WW2 at all cus a lot changed since then
cus at the time of WW2, Allies were more powerful
right but the topic isnt tactics
Yep... US only started developing a real, modern medium tank after they saw what German tanks were able to
this is like talking about best F1 driver and then talking about team strategists
At what time? In 1940, 1941 it was pretty even
You have to consider them too
not when we're not talking about it
You started talking about tanks in WW2, and tactics play a huge role
i mean you gotta understand US priorities in interwar. they werent focuses on military cus they didnt wanna go to another european war
ok then. if german tactics were so good why did they lose?
Yep, I understand them. Same as you are able to understand German priorities regarding tank design
if german tactics were so good, why couldnt they capture a weakened Britain?
Its not surprising if you fight the whole world
thats literally a tactical error tryna fight the whole world
proving that their tactics arent allat
Britain was saved by the sea. Germany was more of a land power
Strategy =/= Tactics
*strategic
^ thanks for grammatical correction
*semantic
Its not even a grammatical error
more saved by the RAF and Royal Navy
you know what i mean
No?
Thats what I meant... If Britain wasnt an island they would have been conquered
ok then, if German tactics were so good, how come even with element of surprise they lost to soviets?
also how did they let the British escape at Dunkirk despite being more powerful than the BEF?
Orders by the painter who didnt understand anything about warfare and relied on the Luftwaffe, and because he was too deep into ideology
Also Battle of Bulge
Also please differentiate between tactics fielded by the officers and between decisions of the painter who was not that competent
tryna do the same thing as 4 years ago
Tbf the idea wasnt that bad
So what? If it works?
except it didnt and the scenario was vastly different
compare to fist fighting:
good tactics: you are really good at knocking guys out etc
bad strategy: you go into a heavy metal club with 100 rockers in there and start shouting insults
:}
By that point Germany already had large issues with fuel. No plan would have worked
WW2 TRIVIA TIMEEEE
idk, maybe tryna broker for peace?
That is a really good comparison
like Japan managed to do
Wouldnt have worked
Especially when they builded almost all of their tactics from tanks and motorized infantry
Dunkirk, Germany had upper hand yet BEF still managed to escape
also i love how this has drifted so far from the original point
couldve tried. honestly their best option
Anyways, WW2 history is too complex just to be like: "Allies had better military because they won the war." I have to go to work now
thats like your mom shows up to the fist fight and forces you to let them go
Germany didnt 'let the BEF go' they tried to destroy them with Luftwaffe yet failed
Yep, best solution when you have oil. Its still "meta" to this day to motorize your army
its more like tryna stomp on the other guy in a fist fight
As I said, wouldnt have worked out
ok, so mom forces you to throw potatoes instead of fists
But issue is that they don't have enough oil
mother didnt force you, you chose to
Not in late 1944
Probably near 1943 or late 1942 too...
Waiting for moderator to ask us for redeploy to ww2 history
In 1943 and especially in 1942 it wasnt a big issue. Sure they had less oil than the Soviets (thats why Fall Blau happened), but they still had the Romanian and Hungarian oil fields. The issue in 1942 and 43 was the long distances of the USSR
Also remember Germany planned a short war (which makes sense looking at their position), so thats why they tried capturing Soviet oil fields because the war dragged on and they knew they will eventually get into trouble
Yes, but they were too much self-confident, remembering problem with winter uniforms in 1941
Not really, the problem was that they had no real strategy after Moscow and goals of the operations were rather vague
*offtopic
And btw, winter uniforms in 1941 were an issue, yes. But the Wehrmacht had decent winter uniforms, they worked well in European winters. Not in a below average temperature Russian 1941/42 winter though
Imagine guy that:
Channel literally called MESS HALL
"Sorry, sir, but your massages are offtopic and extremely illegal, please stand by for discord judgement."
Honestly a Fall Blau map for HLL would be good since that really was an important campaign but is undertold except Stalingrad
I've seen footages of Germans in Moscow outskirts, wearing summer jackets and etc
iirc those are scouts
Yep, because the coats were warm, but unpractibal for actual fighting
Relief came in 1942 with the Winterwendeanzug, but there were far too few
Please redeploy. 
Press escape, hit redploy.
We're losing AA Network
Not a furry, just love polar bears 🙂
I can't redeploy, because one agency at my country banned one protocol, that responded for ONLINE GAMING in HLL, so ordering for furry deployment is only option in this situation
is there a way to view all tanks in the game?
as in information about them or... ?
nah i just wanna look at them
Chad German soldier
We've got a good guide, just a moment.
(and/or test drive them)
Well, you can go to the practice range.
doesnt have all im pretty sure, practice doesnt show tiger or firefly but im pretty sure those are in the game
German Practice Range.
Allies practice range
ye, doesnt have tiger
Then I guess you'll have to go to an empty server and hop on there to screw around? 🤷♀️
Better than the Americans
no firefly but pretty sure its in game
See above
just use illegal vpns like kedo
Of course
all i see is Churchill, Cromwell and Tetrarch?
This message
HBT uniforms are not warm at all lol
The greatcoats issued as winter uniforms were pretty warm but non of the wool was windproof and most of it didnt have liners
My experience from wearing a couple real and repro stuff is layers and long jons
German tactics werent as good as anyone elses (they lost lol) but German Intelligence really hampered the war effort.
Two examples to illustrate this; The germans underestimate the number of reserves and how quickly the USSR could mobilise them. They under estimated the standing USSR Red Army by about half.
The second example of intelligence failure was that the Luftwaffe didnt know about Fighter Command, Chain Home, Number of RAF planes, Number of Pilots, Location of most of the nexus control centres, the industrial capacity the UK had.
Germany wasnt actually very good at understanding its opponents because generally they arrogantly assumed everyone would fight like they did.
They didnt have a strategic bomber force because they just couldn’t conceive of the Luftwaffe not being just a force multiplier of the Heer
i know, but some guy was acting like Germany had superior tactics to everyone else
Thats going to ruffle some internet historians but its true. German intelligence serves were awful
i was just pointing out some times that they lost due to poor tactics
Yeah they werent. Blitzkrieg only worked when it was attacking un mobilised or ill prepared opponents.
idk what they other guy was tryna prove cus he made 0 points for both his arguments
Most of the fighting the germans actually did on the tactical level and actually the strategic level was what everyone else would do, which is create culdrons and local encirclements.
This was in no small part to the mixed French and British Rearguard putting up a tenacious fight. And the perseverance of the Royal Navy and RAF for covering and evacuating.
Oh lol no. There are so many reasons why this just isnt true:
Over gunned
Unreliable
Expensive to manufacture even in ideal conditions and poorly built with Germanys ravaged war time industry
Difficult maintain and service
Far too heavy
- gunner sights perma zoomed in by 2.5x iirc
Even the derivatives were so hard to convert because german engineering just wasnt that good ironically.
Like im sorry but you dont get to be the best tank of the war while needing a full overhaul at a field depot every 100km
i mean, "best of" is relative
when the US doesnt even try to make a competitive tank and the russians dont expect a tank to last very long its kinda easy
The US prioritised easy maintenance and build ability. Literally no point having 1000 glass canon tanks when your enemy can absorb thousands of knocked out tanks in a logistics train that spanned half a plannet
And the 75mm gun on the Western Allied medium tanks would still knock out german tanks pretty handily most of the time
US didnt need good tanks because germany didnt have enough anymore
if they had been up against the east front stuff they would have had to build a real one
I dont believe that for a second. The 75mm in the M4E3 could take on T34/85s pretty well too
i meant the kind of tank armies germany fielded in the east
Im not really sure what you mean tbh
German tank armies werent a thing. They biggest armour organisation was a devision
the US didnt have to go against massed armor like the russians did
Ah okay. Yeah they didnt, but i think the sherman and honestly the rest of the western allies would have been able to content with the soviets pretty well
Imo anyway
maybe
Strength of the Red Army is extremely overrated imo anyway
like half the fuel the USSR was using was from texas and half the USSR field ration packs were main in North American factories so like good luck with that Stalin
Like you cant say the Red Army the germans faced would be the Red Army the western allies could have faced because of all the lend lease
Without Lend-Lease, the USSR would have lost against Germany. Simple as that.
This
Over gunned? The Panthers cannon was able pierce any tank its enemies threw at them.
How is that a bad thing?
Unreliable?
Panther reliability reached amounts equal to other German tanks of the time
Germany had less resources than the US, so they had to build better tanks
They were. Research 1. Panzerarmee eg
yes and germany was using alot of foreign factories so they couldn't build up the proper logistics for proper mass production
Yes, only in 1944 they were "strong" (they still had massive issues until the end of the war and beyond)
The final drive trains were the worst part. But we’re completey capable of normal operations
Which made sense since Germany is not as big or rich in resources like the US
I actually heard of Jagdpanther crews fixing the issue with the final drives
So people generalizing and saying "German tanks bad, allied tanks good" are false
Germany had a different approach to tanks
Even if its soft factors are beaten by the Sherman, which in some regards I’d say they were.
The extreme advantage of the hard factors can’t be forgotten
It’s frontal armor and gun was superior to any medium tank of the era
Other german tanks are not a metric for reliability
They didnt build better tanks
German tanks weren’t breaking down because they were designed poorly. They were breaking down due to extreme supply/war demands coupled by the vehicle not being perfect like any machine of war
If German tanks were truly unreliable they wouldn’t be able to cope with the extremes they faced
They didnt cope with the extremes the faced though. Interleaved road wheels trapped ice, mud, and slow far more than bogey or christie suspensions
And they were heavy, heavy tanks dont work in mud and broken up roads
So how did these tanks even fight if all of them were stuck?
cons list for panther:
transmission issues
bit cramped (especially turret)
gunner sights permanently 2.5x zoomed in, hard to see
costly and hard to produce
heavy (so hard to recover)
weak side armour vulnerable to AT rifles
costly and difficult to maintain and repair
it was a heavy, not a medium
and if you rly wanna play WT designations, the M26 had better armour
It was a medium tank
It was designed and used as a medium
(even tho both are heavy tanks)
It’s weight is not the deciding factor in its class
ok fine, its a medium. M26 has better armour
Ok sure. A tank that has less than 100 active chassis in active use
also M93 shot from the 76mm M1 could penetrate roughly 240mm of RHA
i think thats more than the panther
numbers is literally one of the cons of the panther
The Panther excelled at mass production
6000 made
Yes from summer 1943 to the end of the war
That’s a crazy number
Given the state of Germany
i mean the sherman had only 1 more year and had 49k made
with variants that had greater armour and firepower to the panther
Do you realize the difference between America and Germany
Germany was getting bombed during all of this and with a smaller industry
Yet still managed to pump out 6,000 tanks of a new design in 2 years
i mean whatever the reasoning is, it doesnt change the 42k difference in numbers
So if the Germans used the Sherman’s they could have made 50k of them?
nah
but they couldve made a lot more than 6k
No they couldn’t have
The Sherman wasn’t some magically tank
I don’t think you realize the scale of American industry
if we ignore the fact that they dont have access to the engine or gun or sights
and assume they have those
America had the largest industry on earth
Unlimited resources
And no threat to its industry
1 Panther cost 117,100 RM to produce
Germany had the 2nd largest economy in Europe, limited resources and a industry that was harassed since 1943
now hold on and let me do maths to figure out how much that is in normal currency
1 Sherman cost 33000 in 1942 $
hold on, lemme do conversions
hold on panther was actually 170000 RM if you want it with armament and radios
ok 1 USD in 1942 was 5RM
maybe
Yes, with a significantly larger industry that was not getting bombed behind it
im getting 2 different numbers here, 2.5 and 5
Like, duh
why tf is it so hard to figure out how much RM is worth
ok official rate set by government was 1 USD = 2.5RM
so 1 Panther tank costed 68000 USD 1942 to produce
ye ok so 1 Sherman was $33,000 in 1942. 1 Panther was $68,000 in 1942
(ignoring that panther entered service a year later, the conversion rate for 1942 and 1943 prolly same)
Twice the cost isn’t much
The main reason the Sherman was built in large numbers, was because it was America building it
America had the largest industry on earth and state of the line quality mass production
difference in cost for 1 unit= 35000 USD 1942 = $700,000 rounded
The Americans could have built the Panther and still pushed those numbers to 50k
it is lol
Twice the cost for a tank that is more or less superior
thats like saying the SVJ isnt that much more than base Aventador or upped huracan
not superior but ok
The extra 30,000 bucks weren’t holding the Germans back from building thousands of tanks
What was holding them back was that they couldn’t
(30,000 bucks in 1942 dollars)(thats $700,000 today)
They didn’t have the resources for it
(per unit)
Germany had a fuel problem
Add a couple thousand more tanks, that’s a couple thousand more tanks you need to supply
guess which tank could use a multitude of engines and so a multitude of fuel types?
yes, its the Sherman
Yeah cause the Germans just had fuel laying around they couldn’t use
i mean the sherman was also more fuel efficient
less weight and all
I hate to break it to you but the Sherman wasn’t fixing Germanys fuel problem
like 13 ton difference in weight
nothing would, but it would consume less fuel
So it doesn’t matter
It doesn’t fit Germanys situation
the prius is gonna get you further
there were sherman variants with better armour, firepower and mobility. so idk what metric it was superior by
Like what?
shermans armed with 17 pounder or 76mm M1 with M93 shot
had better firepower
any sherman with the Ford GAA Gasoline engine had far better mobility
and the jumbo's (both 75 and 76) had better armour
17 pounder was equal to the KWK42, the KWK42 with HVAP was better
Less than 209 jumbos made
And has mobility issues
production numbers dont seem to matter to you unless it favours you
so did panther so equal in that regard
Mobility was better, but it’s not like the Panther was a slug
The Panther wins in armor and firepower
what about 17 pounder with HVAP?
listened to nothing i said
also 76mm M1 with M93 could penetrate 240mm of RHA
(thats enough to kill a tiger 2 frontally)
17 pounder 275 268 256 244 233
Panther 265 253 234 216
yup
17 pounder was also rather inn accurate
And causes a variety of issues in the firefly
the firefly issues were mainly bc we put that thing in a mostly unmodified sherman turret
put it in a T23 turret and those issues would be solved, but they never did
(oh ye, also there was a sherman variant with the 90mm M3 from the M26 Pershing)
239 227 208 191 Sherman 76
Some people here should be quiet when it comes to German equipment since they repeat the same myths over and over again
The numbers clearly show the Panther being superior to the Sherman 76mm
And worse by a very small margin than the 17 pounder but much better in soft factors
panther is NOT better in soft factors what are you smoking?
Panther wasnt unreliable. Panther was not a low production, expensive and heavy tank. Panther had tech the allies only used after the war (copied from the Panther)
The panthers gun was more accurate than the 17 pounder
6k Panthers made
And didn’t need to remove the bow gun for ammo
Getting rid of the radio operator
And causing the crew to close their eyes when firing
Yep, its a pretty high number considering the circumstances
i mean for Germany that mightve been better, less crew per tanks means you can man more tanks with same number of tankers
Yes get rid of the radio operator for every tank
ye but compared to what we're comparing the panther to, not much
Thats against German armored doctrine...
Great idea
You clearly don’t know what your talking about and play too much WarThunder
i dont play War Thunder
that games is buns
Gaijin are a corporate greedy company
I don’t even recall many reports of panthers being penned from the frontal plate
I’m sure it happened but not as often as shots to the side and turret
in Tunisia theres reports of M10's demolishing Panthers
Very respectable, high number considering the situation Germany found itself in and that production only started halfway through the war
(ig but compared to 49k from the sherman, it kinda dwarfs it)
Panthers in Africa?
1943
Are you being purposely obtuse?
Tunisia
Not a single panther ever set foot in Africa
(maybe it was somewhere else i cant remember i heard it 3 years ago)
That comparison is completely pointless because the situations in the American industry and the German industry were so vastly different
It's like comparing apples and oranges.
i mean the convo isnt about industries, its about the numbers made
It is about industries.
also Panther cost 2x more to make, i did the maths already
You can't just ignore context when looking at production numbers.
Unless you are being purposely obtuse
The same applies in the modern day. America is such a industrial powerhouse
im not but all im saying was Sherman was easier to produce
it was 2x cheaper
Exactly
thats all im tryna say
Like Prince Paul already said, if Germany had produced the Sherman and the USA had produced the Panther, it's not like the US would've built only 6k Panthers but the Germans 40k Shermans
yes but one cost twice more than the other
It's not due to the tank, it's due to the industry behind it and the fact that the American industry did not get bombed into the stone age.
you seem to be ignoring that
Your point is utterly pointless.
you dont even have a point?
why are we talking about the M1 now?
Even if a Panther would have been significantly cheaper, Germany could not have produced many more.
i dont care about the M1
But here’s the thing. America can afford that
Elise “ignore sparrow he’s an idiot” energy
Because I’m showing a tank that fits the industry
Panther didnt fit the german industry tho
you already said they had fuel problems
If we ignored every idiot, there would be no government
lol
They should have built no tanks then?
nah, just ones that didnt guzzle fuel as much
Germanys fuel problems were around before these tanks
so why build fuel guzzlers then?
I blame the Luftwaffe
All tanks are
also i still havent heard a SINGLE good and backed up point about why the Panther was the best tank of the war out of you
Show me the tank that does not guzzle down fuel
All tanks are thirsty bois
The panthers wasn’t some tank that ate up fuel
some more than others
Naturally
It wasnt the most efficient but nothing crazy
I never said it was
The Sherman was
The Germans lost almost all of her airforce because the AA Gunners thought they were a huge allied bombing raid
brother, why tf are we arguing then
WE HAVE THE SAME ARGUMENT
Isn’t prince Paul French?
Cause I think the Panther is better than the Sherman’s armor and firepower and overall design
those last 2 words confused the hell out of me
My reason for the Sherman being the best is due to its pure application that fit perfectly into the American industry
Because they won the war?
No
nah bro, Bob Semple tank won the war
not the Sherman
True
Best tank is a hard question
Bob Semple
The mine sweepers
But to me it’s the tank that suited best the needs of their country
If it weren’t for the Royal Navy , D-Day would have been a huge massacre
imo imma say Challenger 2 just cus im British
i mean Omaha kinda already was
Omaha was horrible
Mini Stalingrad
There was a destroyer crew who gave their lives to help out Omaha
They came in peppered the coastal fortifications to help the second and third waves who were also getting chewed up
someone correct me, did the 2nd Rangers land on the Beach or did they come from Point du hoc?
Honestly they should make a film
Prince Paul being incredibly based 😍
The rangers CO diverted them to Sword
Seeing how DOG was a horror movie
Not in 1943
Shortly after 6:30am on 6th June 1944 along this stretch of sand, men of the US 1st Infantry Division emerged from their landing craft into a hail of gunfire which in just minutes had killed or wounded hundreds.
In this video, we’ll blend the latest technology, actual footage from that day and the testimony of those who were there, to follow i...
i remember i used to play WT. i stopped. oh how much happier i am now
War thunder?
thnx
ye, used to play it. stopped. am much happier now
that game is so horrible
its literally just a cash grab
there are some tanks on sale for $2000 in WT
10:50
They got diverted
theres a SKIN in WT that costs $2000
aight thnx
i would post photo but cant for some reason
Off topic photo
what is this
The admins are more relaxed about stuff unless you’re spewing vulgar hate
Gif
i know but like what does it mean
Is Elise a chick?
like a baby chicken?
Who's Elise?
Expedition 33
they should add paratroopers to HLL
No
True
I know a couple of female hell let loose tankers
That's horrible
A real party
what up
Say it with me lads, women
women
wonen
Hyrum ahh gif
We should ban women from Earth
why, i love women
anyone else got "Client Integrity Violation" error and know what that means?
🛐 true! women are too cool to be stuck on earth, send us to the mars or something.
verify files
also possible you got RAM errors
Whatever you want, just enough far from other humanity
I'm guessing you're afraid of talking to woman .. :p
thanks, will try that
or its the other way around
There is a reason german offensives, or any other nations for that matter didnt go well in terrain and times of the year where the climate and weather were wet and muddy.
Consider that germany launched is successful offensives (In europe anyway) during the summer or dryer months and had some moderate successes when the ground was frozen. Tanks were successful in the desert because the ground was harder and rocky. They were not used in the dunes and sandy conditions.
Also consider a lot of the successful German tank offensives were early war with lighter weighted tanks.
Thats just the nature of tank combat though, terrain ans weather are big factors. Strip that away however and things like inter-leavened road wheels by their nature trap dirt and ice and mud more so than bogey, and christie, and torsion bar suspensions
No, I'm suddenly not afraid... If that was just fear, that been more simple
Although i think its funny that Patton was able to relocate his armoured forces in the same poor weather just south of the ardennes offensive to the North to meet the German attack and the germans could barely get their armour moving
when can we have openable doors in HLL?
thats like the main advantage that Enlisted has over HLL
And S44
Squad 44
i wouldnt call it the main advantage :}
nah it is
the modelled vehicles dont matter
No, shhhhhhh
all that matters in Enlisted are the doors
forget the planes and realistic tank modules and the more weapons they have and paratroopers and the events they have and the halloween event. Doors.
löl
Let's not be sexist in here. Thanks. 😉
Sex is a lie
My game crashed and now i cant get past the ‘Press any button to continue’ screen?
Me too. Thought there was something wrong with me PC.
Is Epic having issues?
Looks like it. https://status.epicgames.com/ Doesn't show HLL specifically but it could be any game.
Welcome to Epic Games Public's home for real-time and historical data on system performance.
Why are they releasing a new map when the game is still crashing?
Because it's been planned for a while?
Put it off the game is in disarray focus on fixing it first then put out new content
Or is that crazy person thinking?
They already pushed it back?
Clearly not enough if the game is still crashing for ppl
"We’ve also listened closely to your feedback and have made the decision to delay the release of Update 19. This will give us additional time to ensure that it launches in the best possible state. We’ll share the new release date soon."
the PTE is a totally different version of the game 😅
Don’t even focus on it for now
Literally 2 versions.
Not crazy, just poorly informed
Level designers usually can't do anything about coding issues and stuff
Well get someone to
They are
Why do they make it seem so hard
Hotfix 3 is coming soon.
Because it is
Is it really that hard to make a game that won’t stop crashing
I'm definitely no T17 shill, but I absolutely believe them that HLL's code is a pain in the as s to work with
Plus, this is UE4 we are talking about
Everyone says this
Because it's correct
You don't even have the game, and even you're like "Hey, they workin' on it" 😛
But cmon after a certain amount of time eventually they can fix it and work on it no?
And there is only a small dev team working on this, most of their devs are working on Vietnam
I hate that so much
Perhaps because of my "distance" to the game, I have neither doomer nor shill views on the game 😉
Theyd have to build the game from the ground up and then release it lol
Making new content when their current content is shite
my impression is that they are NOT really working on stability at all
ofc it is hard
🤷♂️ that's just how it is. If I were in charge of T17, I'd do the same.
From my experience, players usually underestimate HARD how complicated and exhausting it is to code games
Can’t they get some of the ppl who made the game to work on it?
Or something it can’t be that hard to fix
And that players often go like "well, just do that" which would be a tremendous undertaking for the devs. Which the players don't realise because they think it's just pressing two buttons
Obviously, it can