(apemademid) `ListTag.find_tag`, `ListTag.find_last_tag` | Denizen and Citizens | Page 1

royal galleon Jun 2, 2024, 3:57 PM

#

example_data:
  type: data
  entries:
    - type: foo
      value: 1
    - type: bar
      value: 2
    - type: baz
      value: 3
    - type: baz
      value: 4
    - type: foo
      value: 5
    - type: foo
      value: 6
    - type: bar
      value: 7

<script[example_data].data_key[entries].find_tag[ <[FIND_VALUE].get[type].equals[baz]> ].get[value]> -> 3

<script[example_data].data_key[entries].find_last_tag[ <[FIND_VALUE].get[type].equals[foo]> ].get[value]> -> 6

loud plinthBOT Jun 2, 2024, 3:57 PM

#

(apemademid) ListTag.find_tag, ListTag.find_last_tag

loud plinthBOT Jun 2, 2024, 3:57 PM

#

royal galleon ```yml example_data: type: data entries: - type: foo value: 1 ...

#

Hi I'm AutoThreadBot! Don't mind me, I'll just be adding the helper team to this thread so they can see it. A human will get to you soon.

buoyant sealBOT Jun 2, 2024, 3:57 PM

#

Changed to Feature

Thread is now a Feature thread. This indicates a request for a new feature to the plugin, that both (A) does not already exist and (B) reasonably can be added. If you are unsure whether this applies, use </helpthread:1028674284870180883> to change back to a normal help thread.

olive spruce Jun 2, 2024, 3:58 PM

#

Does this even work

desert kettle Jun 2, 2024, 3:58 PM

#

its a feature request, but uh

royal galleon Jun 2, 2024, 3:58 PM

#

Feature request ye

desert kettle Jun 2, 2024, 3:59 PM

#

i see what you meant, but i think you meant like, similar to listtag.filter[tag].first kind of thing

royal galleon Jun 2, 2024, 3:59 PM

#

Denizenified this: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Array/find

MDN Web Docs

Array.prototype.find() - JavaScript | MDN

The find() method of Array instances returns the first element in the provided array that satisfies the provided testing function.
If no values satisfy the testing function, undefined is returned.

royal galleon Jun 2, 2024, 3:59 PM

#

desert kettle i see what you meant, but i think you meant like, similar to listtag.filter[tag]...

sorry can't do that

#

it's too hard filtering the whole list to get a single entry

#

(mentally hard)

desert kettle Jun 2, 2024, 3:59 PM

#

it takes a lot of processing when you have a big list of maps

royal galleon Jun 2, 2024, 3:59 PM

#

i mean i'm currently making a proc for that

desert kettle Jun 2, 2024, 4:00 PM

#

but idk how this would work in denizen

olive spruce Jun 2, 2024, 4:00 PM

#

What does <script[example_data].data_key[entries]> return

royal galleon Jun 2, 2024, 4:00 PM

#

just assumed it's not too fancy or undeground of a feature not to make it a tag

desert kettle Jun 2, 2024, 4:00 PM

#

royal galleon just assumed it's not too fancy or undeground of a feature not to make it a tag

a list of maps

#

wrong reply

olive spruce Jun 2, 2024, 4:00 PM

#

did you try that ingame

royal galleon Jun 2, 2024, 4:00 PM

#

invalid syntax

#

it can't be done as a script key directly, but common generated data

desert kettle Jun 2, 2024, 4:01 PM

#

<script[example_data].data_key[entries]> would return li@ map@[type=foo;value=1] etc

royal galleon Jun 2, 2024, 4:01 PM

#

Capture_decran_2024-06-02_a_18.01.33.png

#

that's how the data is actually generated

desert kettle Jun 2, 2024, 4:02 PM

#

wait

royal galleon Jun 2, 2024, 4:02 PM

#

royal galleon ```yml example_data: type: data entries: - type: foo value: 1 ...

which would result in a data format similar to this, even though denizen itself doesn't support the syntax

desert kettle Jun 2, 2024, 4:02 PM

#

wtf are you doing there kekw_dog

olive spruce Jun 2, 2024, 4:02 PM

#

desert kettle `<script[example_data].data_key[entries]>` would return `li@` `map@[type=foo;val...

No it does not, because data scripts don't support that yet. That was my point lol.

desert kettle Jun 2, 2024, 4:02 PM

#

err

royal galleon Jun 2, 2024, 4:02 PM

#

put that example to display the kind of data format i'm referencing in my very specific case
can work with any list otherwise

olive spruce Jun 2, 2024, 4:02 PM

#

Ye I know.

royal galleon Jun 2, 2024, 4:03 PM

#

For now i'll just use a proc but it'd be useful

#

Also for consistency it might as well return the index of the matching entry, as does ListTag.find

#

Tho in that case I'd consider the actual entry more useful

olive spruce Jun 2, 2024, 4:05 PM

#

!t list.find_all_matches

onyx wagonBOT Jun 2, 2024, 4:05 PM

#

olive spruce !t list.find_all_matches

Tag: <ListTag.find_all_matches[<matcher>]>

Returns all the numbered indices of elements that match within a list,
using the system behind !language Advanced Object Matching,
or an empty list if the list does not contain that item.

Returns

ListTag

Examples

# Narrates a list of "2|3"
- narrate <list[one|two|three].find_all_matches[t*]>

olive spruce Jun 2, 2024, 4:05 PM

#

wouldn't that help you

royal galleon Jun 2, 2024, 4:05 PM

#

no i'm dealing with a map

olive spruce Jun 2, 2024, 4:05 PM

#

You are dealing with a list, that returns maps.

desert kettle Jun 2, 2024, 4:05 PM

#

olive spruce No it does not, because data scripts don't support that yet. That was my point l...

https://paste.denizenscript.com/View/123388
i guess my confusion was that it sometimes does infact work

Denizen Debug Logs From A Minecraft Server | Paste #123388 | Denize...

Content of Server Log Paste #123388: Denizen Debug Logs From A Minecraft Server... pasted 2024/06/02 09:05:23 UTC-07:00, Paste length: 1258 characters across 20 lines, Content: Java Version: 17.0.10Up-time: 1m 24s

royal galleon Jun 2, 2024, 4:05 PM

#

the only tag-based workaround currently is Behr's suggestion

#

listtag.filter.first

desert kettle Jun 2, 2024, 4:06 PM

#

li@type<&ampco> foo| ew lol

royal galleon Jun 2, 2024, 4:06 PM

#

desert kettle https://paste.denizenscript.com/View/123388 i guess my confusion was that it som...

tf

#

Capture_decran_2024-06-02_a_18.06.49.png

#

i get this with the mock script

olive spruce Jun 2, 2024, 4:07 PM

#

Yeah the parser does not support that

desert kettle Jun 2, 2024, 4:07 PM

#

maybe because its a data script container, with a real script attached

royal galleon Jun 2, 2024, 4:08 PM

#

also in case you ever need to put lists of maps in your item scripts, unrelated gift for ya

# Converts a map to a list, using the keys ordered alphabetically to determine the order of map values.
map_to_list:
  type: procedure
  debug: false
  definitions: MAP
  script:
    - determine <[MAP].keys.alphabetical.parse_tag[<[MAP.<[PARSE_VALUE]>]>]>

desert kettle Jun 2, 2024, 4:09 PM

#

isnt that an existing tag

olive spruce Jun 2, 2024, 4:09 PM

#

<[MAP.<[PARSE_VALUE]>]> tf

royal galleon Jun 2, 2024, 4:09 PM

#

used as

example_data:
  type: data
  entries:
    0:
      type: foo
      value: 1
    1:
      type: bar
      value: 2
    2:
      type: baz
      value: 3
    3:
      type: baz
      value: 4
    4:
      type: foo
      value: 5
    5: 
      type: foo
      value: 6
    6:
      type: bar
      value: 7

<script[example_data].data_key[entries].proc[map_to_list]>

royal galleon Jun 2, 2024, 4:09 PM

#

olive spruce <[MAP.<[PARSE_VALUE]>]> tf

concise syntax for <[MAP].get[<[PARSE_VALUE]>]>

desert kettle Jun 2, 2024, 4:10 PM

#

!t maptag.to_list

olive spruce Jun 2, 2024, 4:10 PM

#

desert kettle isnt that an existing tag

pretty sure there is a tag for it yes

onyx wagonBOT Jun 2, 2024, 4:10 PM

#

desert kettle !t maptag.to_list

Tag: <MapTag.to_list[(<separator>)]>

Returns a list of all key/value pairs in this map, separated by the specified separator symbol. If none is given, uses the slash '/' symbol.
Note that there is no escaping of the separator, so maps that have the separator in their keys will not be possible to convert back to a map.
Inverted by !tag ListTag.to_map

Returns

ListTag

Examples

# Narrates "a/1", then "b/2", then "c/3"
- foreach <map[a=1;b=2;c=3].to_list> as:slashed:
    - narrate "<[slashed]>"

olive spruce Jun 2, 2024, 4:10 PM

#

no not that

#

!t map.get_subset

onyx wagonBOT Jun 2, 2024, 4:10 PM

#

olive spruce !t map.get_subset

Tag: <MapTag.get_subset[<key>|...]>

Returns the subset of the map represented by the given keys, ordered based on the input list.
Keys that aren't present in the original map will be ignored.

Returns

MapTag

Examples

# Narrates a map of '[b=2;a=1]'
- narrate <map[a=1;b=2;c=3].get_subset[b|a]>

royal galleon Jun 2, 2024, 4:10 PM

#

no, to_list will make <list[a:b|c:d].to_list[:]> turn into [a=b;c=d]

olive spruce Jun 2, 2024, 4:11 PM

#

maptag.get_subset[<maptag.keys.alphabetical>]

royal galleon Jun 2, 2024, 4:11 PM

#

pretty smart

#

off topic tho, back to find_tag and find_last_tag

#

actually no

royal galleon Jun 2, 2024, 4:12 PM

#

olive spruce maptag.get_subset[<maptag.keys.alphabetical>]

pretty not smart

#

it returns a copy of the original map with a new order

#

need an additional values

#

if there's such tag

#

!t maptag.values

onyx wagonBOT Jun 2, 2024, 4:13 PM

#

royal galleon !t maptag.values

Tag: <MapTag.values>

Returns a list of all values in this map.

Returns

ListTag

Examples

# Narrates a list of '1|2|3|'
- narrate <map[a=1;b=2;c=3].values>

royal galleon Jun 2, 2024, 4:13 PM

#

ye there is

olive spruce Jun 2, 2024, 4:13 PM

#

Do you want to sort by value or by key

desert kettle Jun 2, 2024, 4:13 PM

#

i believe the map based on tags

#

eg highest / equals something

#

key or value

royal galleon Jun 2, 2024, 4:14 PM

#

royal galleon also in case you ever need to put lists of maps in your item scripts, unrelated ...

to achieve the same result as this, you'd need to
<[MAP].get_subset[<[MAP].keys.alphabetical>].values>

royal galleon Jun 2, 2024, 4:14 PM

#

royal galleon also in case you ever need to put lists of maps in your item scripts, unrelated ...

but at this point you have mutliple iterations over the map, while this one is only looped over once

olive spruce Jun 2, 2024, 4:15 PM

#

I'm slightly confused what this does

desert kettle Jun 2, 2024, 4:15 PM

#

with this:

  entries:
    - type: foo
      value: 1
    - type: bar
      value: 2

he wants to return the second map without parsing over the list at all without filtering it first

#

it can be a heavy tag with the filter

royal galleon Jun 2, 2024, 4:15 PM

#

olive spruce I'm slightly confused what this does

which one now ? the proc i sent ?

olive spruce Jun 2, 2024, 4:15 PM

#

royal galleon also in case you ever need to put lists of maps in your item scripts, unrelated ...

Doesn't this sort the map by key, alphabetically?

#

AH, and you want to return the VALUE

#

Okay got it now.

royal galleon Jun 2, 2024, 4:18 PM

#

royal galleon used as ```yml example_data: type: data entries: 0: type: foo ...

- determine <[MAP].keys.alphabetical.parse_tag[<[MAP.<[PARSE_VALUE]>]>]>

using this script's entries key:
[MAP].keys.alphabetical will return 0|1|2|3|...
then over each entry of the list, we get the map's value
so ye, we're basically returning the values of the map as a list, ordered by key

#

it's really just a quick helper i setup to be able to include lists of maps in my scripts

#

---------------------------

end of parenthesis on maps

back to the find_tag thing, i actually can't even make a proc out of it

#

a proc of this type is based on an input tag with definition, and i can't do like <[list].proc[find_tag].context[<[FILTER_VALUE].some[condition]>]> because then <[FILTER_VALUE].some[condition]> is parsed before being passed to the proc, and errors

#

so for now it's indeed limited to filter_tag.first

#(apemademid) `ListTag.find_tag`, `ListTag.find_last_tag`

---------------------------

end of parenthesis on maps