#Tournament Chat
1 messages · Page 27 of 1
is the distance in meters or kilometers
probably meters
wait so on the save the ships start 50kms away but the ion is only about 33kms
is that intentional?
mf wants to code tacit tf
@young jacinth will the event be cancelled if there few players ?
#1183552229962154024 message
i'd like to join if i get the motivation but i don't want to waste time on a cancelled event
trying to get the AI to ram an orbiter is hard
how is it so hard to ram something that is basically spining in place
im watching the ai pilot the DC ship with tail and its wtf
is it trying to strafe?
AI skill issue
If only we could order AI to auto fire thrusters upon spawning, we could make AI railspinners...
like what direction are you trying to turn
this Ai tourney is going to be so frustrating to watch lol
fuck it im doing cruiser thrust
seeing the AI try to use the tail is so dumb
@young jacinth whats the timer for rod
@young jacinth Can we give you an instruction list, like detonating charges ?
Oh it's not creative right.
No
20 min on 1/2 speed
Ill do the tourney if at least one player other than me signs up. Since 2 others already signed up the tourney is almost guaranteed to happen.
nice!
Rod size ?
Normal
#1020489415476396043 message Posted all the settings here
Could you put it on announcements? I'm sure another one will ask the same question soon
Btw, is the save ready ?
hm nvm just an ad for tourney bot https://discord.com/application-directory/551608985900417024
seems pretty useful tho as it can automatically handle signups, brackets, and even show overall stats like your win/loss ratio
I would definetly reduce the overhead for hosting tournaments here
is it paid..?
you need to pay for any kind of large server functionality
$9 a month for teams and up to 32 participants
I took a look at that bot a couple months back and the features it offers are quite nice. Although, considering you can use free software to make your brackets is it worth it?
yeah no probably not
when deadline
phase 2 submissions have been closed for ~20 min btw
That's very similar to mine
My first submission when the distance was short was a bunch of alpha boosters with a grid-length stick of structure
SAME
why is urs sideways
With bunk moved forward too?
YE
No way lol
%chance for the ion beam to hit sooner
I guess there isn't a big difference in possible solutions
No... I think it's fine
did u do autoram for the old ship (before rule change?)
I didn't even make an old ship lol
did u think to*
Only worked on it yesterday
Yeah, or you said smth about it
i said smtg about it
i want to know how many people were thinking about it
because if the ruleset didnt change i coulda just flat out won
ik 1 person was struggling with this
Mine was effectively the same
I had the stuff moved in different places but I'm pretty sure they'll score almost the same
Me and the boys fighting for first over how air rounds the numbers
yeah, it's going to come down to tick rng
oooh so fun I love that
salephz and I have it one block farther forward so we should win right
tick rng :(
i should've put in the no/reduced drag when i started
would've been more itneresting
I'll not post mine, you already did 
i did exactly this layout
nobody tried small thruster + cap ? it should win price cat.
I did large thruster + cap
how much caps?
3
What do you mean is it bad?
no no i found funny when i opened my calc sheet to find it.
no no i'll never laugh at someone else creation
it's good but for price seems that this one is better
Sarcasm detected
no it's not sarcasm
Its cut off
Small thuster?
Somehow didnt even consider asymmetrical design because I thought it loses to mich speed
Rip
no asym
Yea Im just stupid xD
but this was not my subm. so, we will see
I opted for a fast ship, not a slow and steady one
I still have two crewmember
It goes 170 m/s
I have more thrust than this ship
But with 1 ht you already go to 170 ms
All engine have the same price efficiency
I'm slightly faster than 170 iirc
171.3
I'm slightly heavier
And slightly faster
I tried to add a middle booster but it would just make me slower on the long run and disable thruster on recharge
Basically, if no one is faster than me I win on crew
OH ! I also ramp up faster
I m not sur to add 2ht for 0.3 m/s is worth. But I tried for overall score and you for speed×crew so it makes sense. Hope for you nobody opted for 3 ht and 1 er because it goes 200+
It's not ht
They are large thruster
Not huge ones
Is going for 3 HT even doable
You would need a larger reactor
It would go slower in my testing
This is only 168 m/s
And is not sustainable
Right I thought it was ht
With 1 crew powering your thrusters you don't have power issue ?
Nope
I needed to make the crew bunk further tho for that
not intuitive
But if the crew bunk was closer
the crew would recharge every thruster once per "cycle"
And lose on travel time
here the crew recharges every thruster twice
Before moving on to the next
Plus the desing was asymetric
You can make that symetric
can u make sure that ppl with the exact same ships get the same score..?
Yeah that would be nice...
phase3 in ~2 h ??
yep
going to be up to tick rng
it will probably be precise enough that u will all tie, which is why i included the significant figures part
it will most likely not matter
had irl sorry :(
wtf
math \👍
higher better
this should scale almost perfectly w/ normal 2:1
so all 2:1s (where each emitter and prism fraction are the same cost/crew/mass) will get the same score
slightly favors smaller ones so infinite cores won't get higher score
ig that wasn't necessary since an infinite core would hit grid size and also range falloff wasn't accounted for
so wait does having more emmiters make your score higher or lower
ig thats for me to find out
so how do I view ion power in dev mode
thank you
wait ions have a maximum power?
thats funny
I mean it makes sense but also
pretty sure that breaks the formula
no?
it's the same as multiplying by 100
damn no flicker start is hard
that is the most minimal crew assignment and it can still flicker bruhh
fym workable
there is physically nothing u can change with that module
When is the AI tournament going to be?
24
bro
Crew quarter placement
Submission is til 24th and games will be recorded after
What will be the starting distance Plaus?
hmm weird formula
I guess it's calculated to make the number of emitters irrelevant
I hope so (please air, I hope you did)
I guess a 128:64:32:16:8:4:2:1 core would be very close to optimal
do 11 ions on a reactor sustain for 2 minutes? hmm
if they do, a 32:16:8:4:2:1 would be better
aagh I want to test stuff
close
I have an ion setup that should work for air even though I'm not participating :P
@white apex what happens if the core flickers
0 points
really? lmao
pray that someone else also flickers so u can have 0.5 points ;)
I think it could be interesting if you allowed some flickering with a big penalty but sure
maybe next time
rn i'm also ok if the core feeds into your own ship (no real output), but that will probably change next time
can I send a core here with very minor flickering that would score very high on your formula? :P
or do I wait
Luna want kill the turney
:D
this doesn't work btw it will flicker
it would work for a real ion ship
meeeh I already know how the winner will be
veeery boring
Let us find out. It's a tournament, it's fun to try ourself. Don't spoil please.
I guess the core in ships has nothing to do with the turney
it does but I hope that's not the best core you can build
I have a better one saved
I love this core.
(Well it's so far an emitter setup, but with core it'll look great)
If it can be cored up of course.
I really really hope people don't get lazy about this one
not true
as long as they have to go through the reactor to get to their room and they're close enough to the ions, it's fine.
yeah but rng means that one of the crew might decided to power the other ion
and then the ion it left loses power
and they both power that one
then eventually it autofixes
and then later more rng it happens again
but air says in the rules that flickering is not allowed
Why would this be the case?
do the math by yourself :D
more distance is bad
There's not a set number for the ion power thougy
Like depending on the prism placement it could range from a lot of different values
And assuming the maximum isn't great
good point tbh
Ah well then yeah more is better
crew and weight are very very easy
price peaks..
weight is easy yeah
crew is easy too
without range falloff, price would not have a peak but it does
Is a power of two always going to be optimal?
yes
w/ out falloff i'm pretty sure it would, only because i copied and pasted soemthing wrong in the formula and it penalizes more emitters slightly harder than it should
do the math by yourself if you don't trust me
yeah, the falloff is very mild
128 cores are still viable
there's an extra ~0.02 in the emitter power iirc
i wonder how the ol' 64:1-6wl-yare does
wl?
wifth?
6 wide linear core
I made a 64 core
I'd say 64 is the best option yeah
I'm not sure if it's better than the obvious 16 setup
might be worse because of range falloff
Wait since the ions only need to last 2 minutes could we just not supply power to the crs
Are CRs even needed?
Don't you need crs to autofire
no
my greatest fear as tourney host is that discord will automatically change my sharing location to #tournament-announcements (has happened several times already) and i will not notice and post 200 memes in there
it randomly just changes
How much should the ships for the upcoming AI-tournament on the 24th cost? I assume 1.5mil?
Are ships without crs allowed air?
yep, 1.5m
Thx
I seem to have encountered the slight issue of prisms not turning to their positions when I don't have a cr
Do you also have the ion energy flickering in debug mode ?
Forget that. I restarted the core and it doesn't flicker anymore
Is that correct ?
Puissance = power obviously
=(PUISSANCE(($B3/1000),2))/(PUISSANCE($C3,0.651139253)*D3)
looks right to me, but i also have a migraine and spent less than 20 sec
Can the prisms rotate or it should start directly on the right position ?
wdym
when u spawn a ship it is facing the built in position
then rotates
You can create a core that start directly with prisms in the right position.
If you read the value after 2min it has no impact, if you read at start than wait 2mins, I have to create another kind of core
i read value after prisms stop moving and any looped energy exits the system
sounds like something malicious can brew
How
Anytime I try they just start in their default positions
Yes, but you can make a core with that but it's not the most compact
Hmm well I think it's probably more optimal to just spend the extra money
Although I'd have to test
i don't think i have time in the end
might throw a ship together tomorrow
@white apex can grade sooner so i can decide which metric i want to win
i can maybeee do it tomorrow
@young jacinth What the exact rules for upcoming AI tournament?
Still didnt manage to put in #tournament-announcements : #1020489415476396043 message
i will not be able to do any grading today or for the next week :( i misplanned the tourney and i have a trip irl
i'm not going to have wifi on the trip either :(
tip for tourney bc i told 1 person: u do not need a control room
next contest (there will be a next contest), everything is going to be planned better
scoring will be quicker (you'll get results before next phase), i won't have irl, it will be more "gamey" and "normal" designs will be les applicable, etc
imo for future contests, the contest should be "power/sustain x number of ion beams/thrusters/literally anything" where x isn't decided by each contestant
and make it weird numbers so that players don't just use already created and optimized modules
i.e. power 6 ion emitters/ 3 ER of 3 HT each/ 3 eight accel railguns
The one I've submitted is better cost, crew, worse mass
im going for mass bc that's the onlyt hing I can win
bruh
Jankiest tournament to ever exist, with more unexpected issues than starfield
u do it then lol
i think phase 1 -> phase 2 went mostly smoothly
phase 2 grading could've been quicker and i should've planned my trips better
Maybe leave the tournament on standby until January
I like this tournament and this it was made very well
I agree, I enjoy it and I've fun to take part
@white apex could we detonate a charge at the begining ?
still no
I guess there are no way to rotate prisms without CP ?
no afaik unless u find a nww gamebreaking bug
i'm off to the caribbean, don't break the game w/ out me~
Enjoy !
Say hi to Jack Sparrow for me!
when submission deadline end?
what even is est
Eastern standard time iirc
utc-5 if it helps
pretty sure u have ~6 hrs left
Sry, I'm sure this has been answered somewhere, but when will the AI tournament be streamed?
Or will it even be streamed?
The plan was to only record it. Since I wont be at home for a while there will be a significant delay. Ill put information about that in the announcement of the next tournament.
You think I should?
Nah, I think for this type of tournament a well put together video might actually be superior to a stream, since many people will be away from their PC anyway.
What's this balance mod required for the tournament?
Wrong tournament. There's no balance mod required for Plaus's
No stress, but I'm curious to when we'll be able to watch the AI tournament.
Not only you waiting 😉
why do all the tourneys have to be at 6 am my time
and also why does my body insist on sleeping until 10
I suppose
but i doubt i could will myself awake at that time
When is the AI tourney gonna be?
I am so unbelievably out of touch of all things tournament related ever since Sariis left.
Plaus said that he'll be away from home for a few days and we should expect it... next week? If I remember correctly.
Real
When is the AI tournament gonna be again?
Blazing Excalibur's season 10 of his Ai cosmoteer tournament is almost over
Mine? Ill record next week
Alrighty, so I guess I will have time to submit a shippo.
Will the fight be in the pvp arena or battle helper?
If former can we have the pvp details?
#1020489415476396043 message
Some say I should have put it in announcements
Id rather repeat it 5 times
Do you want to compete? Submissions are already over
Awwww...
That's sad, I would've love to try but whatever.
Super out of touch of tourneys.
@raven fern @vocal cloak @hybrid tulip @rain loom @icy oxide @near robin @hazy root
@surreal pecan would like to submit a ship but is to late. Since Im not able to record this week anyways would you be ok with the submission time being extended by 1 week?
1️⃣ for yes
2️⃣ for no
(Or dm me to vote anonymously)
@young jacinth Hey that build and battle tournament. Is it a 500k battle or using the new game mode that will be in place?
The new game mode
500k is the settings that will be used
Well I will have to try it out before I decide then.
Nice nice, I'll take that as a yes.
@trim anchor Wants to participate too I think.
The extension can be used by anyone
nah i cant
i would like to but i wont be able to make it
just release .recs for ai tourney when u finish a match
Literally all you need to do is make or not even make, just send Plaus one ship
well why are coconut and myself not included in the voting?
Shit somehow missed you 2
Sorry
You can also vote of course
In my defence I was very distracted when I wrote this
like i said in excelsior, im kind of on vacation
and nowhere near my laptop
Copy a ship you posted
.
lemme see
an older version of my ion orbiter?
or my avoider, also outdated version
deadass these are like the only 2 i can find
maybe i come next tournament prepared?
DM them to him
In a zip so I cant see the ship...
are you taking part in your own tournament?
hmmm makes sense to the ZIP thingy
my original submission had the raw file which i removed after checking the rules (had the side effect of giving you two ping btw i'm sorry for that)
Yes
Ah dont think that I saw the original
the 500k tourney?
Was refereng to xsnows message lol
ah
I would have won the second 500k tourney but i was busy sleeping
my frickin lock failed on me so i went out first round lmao
that sucks loll
Oh the surprise;)
I uploaded this ship
Mine was a 32 emitters without CR
Mine was like half of this, one emitter and a prism
i was about to ping cgt and tell him that someone had the same ship
I uploaded a 16ion design, with cr
Lemme go find ot
According to my spreadsheet this got good Mass and crew score but sacced the cost score heavily
That core must look wild
thats too many reactors, could run it off of two
I know
I sacrifices cost for a better crew score
And slightly better mass score
I had many designs of lots of different variants including mixes of cost optimization vs crew optimization and eventually landed on 16 beams with that config
when grading 😭
what stats does this have
Good question, don't have access to my laptop till Sunday cause out of towm
The excel sheet was just saved to my laptop as well so I can't look at it 💀
I'll see if I can download the ship file from my dm with air onto my phome
Off the top of my head it scored .28 cost (actual score times 10,000 so i could look at ot easier), crew was like .31 or smth and mass was .40
Those could be wildly off though
look that
magnificent
Old msg, but no it can't. I always use this and it never flickers.
In my tests not because you can't make the core compact like that
But it's worse in numbers
But that setup only works with emitters in 4 directions
nope
I really really hope this setup doesn't win
a 64 or 128 ion setup deserves to win the cost category
I'll be very disappointed if this wins
Hmmmm let me try because at one point you have to go to a single prism and with that setup I don't see how
Problem I see is to regroup to a center prism without redirection prism
It was a previous version. I'll share it because I find the shape fun and has a low distance between prisms
i had a better 32 design but 16 is always better than 32
Would you share it ?
when i get home
in
7 hours
or maybe 8
damn i sure hope i didnt override that one
But it was not your final submission? Did you go for 16 emitters?
i had 3 submissions with dependencies
1 was the same as cgt
1 was 8
and last was 16
thats the one i probably submit
That's really smart, beats mine out on crew and mass by a long shot
I didn't consider a diag design
the actual output is a bit weaker tho
more distance compared to a linear design
also i hope u guys with crs didnt have dedicated cr crew
bc thats actually stupid
Do they not need to be on 💀
Probably should've tested it
It is what it is though
So you do need crew for crs
so u just need them on for 5 secs
then the cr crew become power crew
@-@
I just slapped an extra 2 crew for my 2 cra
Cra
Crs
Wait how do you get the crew to only operate them for 5 seconds?
Or however long jt takes the prisms
Then why do they ever operate the cockpit
Oh wait duh
Cause ions start eith power
From my tests, the 32 emitters variant has a better score
I tested the ships posted and got those results
my power is not
82
unless smtg is wrong with my ship
didnt pair prisms correctly
ohno..
o- wait i alr fixed that
It was not what you submitted ?
no i grabbed a random link i posted to myself
With a fixed version
b&b came too quick for ya ig
I went for a 8 ion setup
basically the most efficient I could run on 1 reactor
No point in getting diminushing returns for more prisms
With 5 k per prism Better use less of them
because 15 prism is one large reactor
the formula accounts for the diminishing returns
the problem with 8 ions is that you need redirection prisms
or a lot of crew I guess
more scores coming when migraine goes away (probably)
That's true... I still think it wins cost tho
I doubt it
I think a 16:1 will win
but I really hope a 64:1 wins
64:1 I probably going to win crew, because that many redirection prisms will take up a lot of price
no
not redirection, combination
we'll see
Seems the case from the scores. The 16 emitters has better score for crews and weight.
You dont?
*with one reactor and with decent crew setups
Guess my crew setup isnt decent then
what's the distance from the reactor to the farthest ion
thats my ship
from my testing it was better than 16 ions
this won't win any category
but I probably just didnt optimize it well enough
whats the cost winner?
my bet is a 16:1 with 2 reactors but we don't know yet
that performed worse for me
but then again...
here you go
The last one is cost right?
plaus is winning credits with that one?
yes
how is salephs
but he has another 8 emitters, didn't shared at the moment
but where are the ships
can i see yours
Salephz: #1020489415476396043 message
Mine: #1020489415476396043 message
I gone for overall
For info the 16 emitters ship of salephz had an issue I fixed it after his messages and used the fixed version in the table
I know but I will not post his ship again, maybe he removed the image on purpose
hmmmmmm
His is more compact
falloff shouldn't affect that much
Do you have the ship file so I can add it to the sheet ?
it's much cheaper per ion
it's not even fully optimised but it has to be better
But now I see that the 32 emitters is dead in all categories
yeah 32 is bad because it needs to use 4 reactors
64 is better because it can use 7 reactors instead of 8
increasing the ion/reactor ratio
128 uses 13 reactors
it's the best case
this does not have crs
That's almost what I did and I realise I made a tiny mistake
Why should it?
.
.
i don't know the rules idk
but if we want to compare them we should compare them in the same conditions idk
Pretty sure air said its ok
You dont need the cr if you dont aim the prisms
ugh
do I have to tweak prisms to avoid aim
yes xD
fine
That's one of the reason I gone for 32 emitters, you don't need to aim prisms.
Possible with 16 but this is worse without crs than with (or I couldn't find a way to make the core compact)
yeah 32 is better with this stupid rule
pfffffffffff
the thing is
why is night worse than plaus then
because plaus is built different
But only in term of credits, everything else is worse
Not disallowing, look salephz has a really good score with his diag ship
My ship uses crs and has a really good crew score
I saccsd cost score but got a great crew score and ok Mass score
it does
no changes 😮💨
that's fine
only the best tournaments last the longest
had a BSC tournament and it lasted about 5, 6 months
bsc?
surprise stream announcement: gonna stream the ai tourney rn on yt: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvYHPRoboEw
Nice, but it isn't dezember anymore.
Base Ship Commander
you submitted it...
it's supposed to be a 7 ship swarm not 5 >:(
you submitted the singular one sorry
what a scam
Thx Plaus for the turney, fun ships present, nice comments, I liked it !
I share my ship file now the turney is done.
That’s the point of the quotation marks
Seems my tests was right and this is one of the best AI meta ☄️
It is brilliant 👏
Thanks!
That 9 DC ship design with flaks and PD is neat!
@icy oxide Congrats on winning the tournament!
stupid ai thing
Yea, it does very dumb genius things
Very cool, i wonder how it would fare in a human tournament
i would do a complete rework before i would considering running it v human
I love how yours looks Immortal.
It's a long time i don't play, but i would love to! Still getting familiar with the new meta (i used to play the legacy version)
Anyways here's mine.
I HEAVILY underestimated the amount of missile kites there'd be in this tournament, it's honestly mental.
To be fair, they are the best types of kites.
Good range, no need for aiming, probably the most reliable choice for an A.I battle
hence why i did whatever i did with that DC rammer
although i did not consider mines
Tournament Leaderboard for those interested in the final results
It definitively don't fear mines 
But oh boy it should.
AND ME AND GAMEKNIGHT SHOULD SPLIT ALL THE CREDIT FOR BEING THE FIRST ONES TO DISCOVER THEIR UNADULTERATED POTENTIAL
Seems someone is burn 🔥
what is TB btw?
I dont even know xD
i cannot watch the tournament because youtube is awful at managing connection
but i bet if i lost it's because i ran with 400k disavantage on everyone!/j
Oh baby I wonder what ships were defeated by my awfully old orbiter? I wasn't expecting to win anything
Btw the Plaus winning his tournaments theory has been crushed.
but oneye was playing them before you?
I'M THIRD ????
omgg
How tf did my timeborn hold up
No armor
Massive
Oh
I guess the propulsion is armor
Missile kite op :ppp
The only people who did better were ones that were using missile kites with our lord and savior MINE
Oh wait nevermind, blaze is there too.
My ship is still pretty bad
I mean, one poor layer of armor
maybe two
no pd
no shield
2 lc when you probably need only one
It's bad every way you look at it
114m/s
only upside
Nuke bias here <--😝
Oh, the AI tournament finally aired? Where can I watch it?
EDIT: Nvm, found it on Plaus' channel.
Forgot to ask in the anouncment:
@raven fern @vocal cloak @desert sky @trim anchor @hybrid tulip @rain loom @icy oxide @near robin @hazy root @surreal pecan
Are you ok with your ship being posted? (Many of you already did)
Absolutely yes
Hmmm
it's flawed outdated & was running underpriced so while i posted it in exelsior already i'd prefer to keep my shame
why do you want to post it?
For people who would like a closer look and just for archival reasons (one person already asked for the files). There is no shame in submitting an unoptimized build as you participated which many didnt at all (and you didnt even perform poorly for that).
But I understand if you dont want it submitted.
yes, im fine w it
Yes. I was gonna post it anyway, so I have no problem if you post it along with most of the others.
i did perform poorly though
Your ship still was interesting, so people might wanna take a look.
veto on my end
Sure
yeah
Posted where, this channel?
Sure.
Id attach it in the anouncment in #tournament-announcements
Sure
I am good.
I don't see them. Are they up already?
champion role????
"This tournament isn't official as it's being treated as a test-bed for future events."
Walt agreed that the champion role be given as reward for winning the tournament
And I think I misinterpreted your question, thought you thought that being the only reward to be too little
cool
1am rip
@gilded spindle the dates in the doc and message dont match
Slowking i beg of you make it 1 hour earlier pls
to quote quiximo himself
"<#1059084974655033415 message>"
@gilded spindle checking the rules i have a question about clarification
"Collaborations, or ships made by multiple players are allowed"
"Built-in ships are allowed"
"Steam Workshop ships are allowed"```
do that mean using a ship fully built by (an)other(s) player that does not feature on the steam workshop nor in the build-ins list make you disqualified even with explicit permission from the author(s) ?
Wait was using workshop ships allowed in the past?
the build-ins and workshop close wasent mentionned iirc
Hmm would be funny to see some pink bricks flying around
Hii hi, I was wanting to try and join the tournament. Even if it's just a learning experience. Would that be okayy?
I'm also still trying to design a vessel for this and player versus player in general.
Of course! Newer players are especially welcome.
you're more than welcome to participate. I recommend you to practice in the casual elim matches and ask around in #ships and excelsior for advice on ship design and piloting
Yeee, I think I have the number of nukes I want to use on each side already, but I'd have to ask to check the number again.
Plaus, I think I was a little bit of elimination matches with you. How many nukes did that design have that I was given have?
I think Xsnow was there for a couple tppp
And I can't type
idk i don't count nukes beyond a point
that thing so beffy i'm just like "don't get hit by death"
I be actually already posting my VERY work in progress design on the Excelsior Discord.
That's sooo valid.
I replied to the wrong message, aaaaa
the difference between four and five is massive (see Edelweiss flower versus Nion) but 16 or 20 is.. less visible especially on fragile ships like i love to play
I think I need a group of 5 nukes on each side to be able to get through heavy shielding.
But I wanted to check if I was using a group of 6 instead.
I wonder if a completely blind tourney is viable, no idea who joined,no clue who you are fighting, only can figure it out based on their ship
Seems like a pain to set up
i would not recommend starting with an UL nuker but it's definitely a solid choice if you can pilot it
rammers are easier to pilot and effective build an ion rammer build an ion rammer join us build an ion rammer
build an ion rammer they’re tasty 😋
i would recommend starting with an UL if you want to
"start with" "ul" ????
anything that would please you to see in any match actually
I.E. antithesis & me started with an avoider
actually ig there is no noob friendly archetype now
and now i play traps and swarm alot and i have a lot of fun
morbiter???
people shouldn't be dragged down upon being forced to learn sometimes simple just because they don't have much experience
heck that the main argument against modern western schooling system
A trap? For new players? are you having a laugh?
it's not because you cannot work your brain piloting more than one ship nobody can//
that's how i learned lol
get good at rts or keep losing
i learned w/ solo squib -> traps -> swarms -> orbi swarms -> m orbi
it is easier to learn to play wheb u can at least win 1 or 2 matches imo
You said rts is bugged, why would you want to make a new player deal with that?
rts not bugged, rts just bad now :(
rts is litterally bugged since 0.24.3 i've sent multiple fix request
o i see
because i'm dealing with it.
both
you’d need permission to use somebody else’s ship, though I don’t know why you would
Waking up to clarify rules isn’t the best idea
7 per side currently is the optimal in my opinion. My 200 speed ul nuke only has 5 per side and often runs into ammo issues because of that. If you have unshielded sides you can go for 8 or 9 but I would not recommend it.
I currently have 7 per side with 2 large shields on each side. I still need to do the front of the silly vessel.
Whats the ship selction process for the tourney? Is it just good old counterpicking until the players stop?
Ship preview is turned off
must have overread that thanks
Guess I should have checked the settings
@gilded spindle no high asteroid density?
Hm I thought past official tournaments had that
I guess saris only did that for regular duells?
One of the reasons for not using high asteroid density in previous tournaments was to reduce lag
Would make for a healthier meta in my opinion but thats a valid reason
It seems to just favor certain archetypes more than others. The same goes for fewer asteroids
I'm guessing railgun vessels are better when there are fewer asteroids?
That would be the case for railkites. TB rails are more meta and aren't affected quite as much
dezember xp
Yes
I cant even write in German so my English is even worse
Don't worry, your spelling is probably better than a lot of native english speakers 😅
I can second this, there are a shocking amount of usa ppl who cannot spell something simple like “appreciate”
thats why I use correction tools
That is... Very true.
Like half the players are from Germany I think?
The largest amount of sales have been from Germany, which is very peculiar, I wonder why.
French & German are tied for 2nd/3rd
there's a lot of germans on the internet
this misrepresents a lot of people like me
i have the game in english
There is also a popular german youtuber who made a few videos on it when it came out
If I recall correctly according to Walt Germans were the first place at some point.
that's 2018 data https://oldwiki.cosmoteer.net/index.php/Community_Surveys
in 2017 (see link above) 3/4 of the cosmoteer players (who answered the survey) were french
If we could get data for 2023 there would still be a vast majority of US players anyway.
Walt was surprised by how many german players there were but they were never 1st. At least not from what I'm able to see from past reports
#ask-walt message
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/368422988753928193/1090359667953250364/image.png?ex=65a6db92&is=65946692&hm=ca50f376ce31c89ed3fab99ca1adf7e06cf7fe6b4699d8f1ba51ff6772469c0a&
(march 2023 data) the game sold almost as much in germany as in the usa but sold more in germany than the usa before
I stand corrected
:>
OF COURSE the germans appreciate quality content about engineering :3
I'm proud of our neighbours
(I'm french)
Lol that is true.
Damn we're going to be 4 or 5 for build and battle
Yea I guess we are not doing the swiss format
@queen aspen can you make it?
@young jacinth No yt stream for b&b tournament?
there will be one
Okay will just do a double elimination bracket and ill participate too
Will we go in vocal for the tournament
You want to help cast? xD
Hey sorry I was having some internet issues. Just got it up and running.
torunament stream: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSPuI_MLuXU
you can still join xD
who do I play
first match still going on
45 minutes lmao
can you put my match back a little so I can get food?
max 10/15 mins
uhm thats not really possible xD
going missing again, another like 10 mins
agony
back again
@gilded spindle
@gilded spindle vs @hybrid tulip
@rain loom
For goodness' sake Plaus it isn't even Dezember at this point.
@rain loom comeback
it will be dezember all the way into july because dezember op
Can't argue with facts.
1️⃣ 2v2 Combiner tournament
2️⃣ 2v2 Elimination, players on the same team cannot use the same weapons
3️⃣ 2v2 Build battle
wdym combiner
Both players play half a ship which combines into a single vessel that they both pilot. Something like these ships below.
@naive lion @surreal pecan Have a couple other none locking variants that use hooks or a structure cage if you'd like to see some of those.
yeah but what if it's just 1 part push another
and also, how to tell if seperation is purposeful
That's a possibility, the ion combiner above is exactly that.
What do you mean by purposeful separation? As in what happens if both players just play their halves as single ships?
I see this going two ways:
-
Introducing a simple rule which says that players have 1 min to combine at the start of the battle. If at any point their ship separates they'll have 15 secs to combine again or else they'll be forced to forfeit.
-
Players submit their ships in advance and it's up to my interpretation to determine if they were designed to function separately just as well. In such a case they'd have to send a new ship(s)
Feel free to share an alternative.
i do not think having "combiner" as a format will work
what if they have a combiner trap
as in each player has 2 parts and they combine w/ each other
or a combiner + squib
Easy fix, those aren't allowed. Players must combine into a single ship, no more
why have combiner competition when illegal 3m ship is functionally mostly the same
It offers a different kind of approach to ship building and requires team synergy. Multiple players were interested in it which is why it's in the list of options for the next tournament
honestly I really would love to do the 2v2 elim
especially with different weapon types being required
because it has the effect of having to use ships that can synergize well together in a known format
I like the combiner tournament idea because for many players it will also be a building challenge since combiners are much less common (to my knowledge at least), just seems it'd bring something else new to the table
YAAAY FORCING THE ENTIRE COMMUNITY TO LEARN COMBINERS :D
I love you Blaze.
I've never built a combiner but they seem like a lot of fun
Sounds cool, but I doubt many people will learn how to make combining ships for it
So it'll end up with a relatively small number of participants
It already has more votes than either of the other options so there will at least be some
Personally, I really like how combiners encourage multiple people to micro the same ship, could allow for some really interesting tech but is also greatly needed for microing the larger ships
agreed, I love watching combiners as well
I'm aware this is technically possible without combiners but multiple people can enter direct control with them which is not possible without
I just think that forcing them will make an unintentional barrier to entry
That most people won't bother trying to overcome
Option 2 still allows the use of combiners
I suppose there's an argument to be made there but I find combiners a lot more interesting, it just seems like a less explored style of building and play
Me omw to join my first tourney in months
The slight issue is that I'm getting my wisdom teeth out on the 16th but like, it can't affect me that much
Surely
What about optimization turney?
unoptimal time management smh
i'm having like 7 years of cosmoteer burnout catch up w/ me :( might be a while
Aw :( please take your time then
🔥
@gilded spindle Regarding the elimination tournament, are you allowing the exploit which makes it impossible for your opponent to target parts on your ship while using PIP?
No, that in my opinion is unsportsmanlike
diags sure, not linear ships built upside down to intentionally use the exploit
Rephrasing; don't use it intentionally
plaus l ig
@gilded spindle is the mod that makes mines more visible allowed?
client side visibility mods r unenforcable
but it would be good to make them all public in the document
link please?
ah ty
I had a question, are we making the vessel on the day. Or bringing designs we have already made?
you bring the stuff you made
Okieee, I think my little nuke vessel could do with a little bit of tender love and care before then.
is the tournament gonna be streamed?
maybe
@gilded spindle
yes, it will be
oki
link to channel?
Could we maybe make a communal tourney stream channel?
I suppose if it ever was to get monetizable it could turn into anarchy, but it sounds like a fun concept.
money goes to walt or something idk, i'd say the host should get paid for the stream an amount depending on views
And he can advertise :>
don't forget to set your alarm up for next week!
will be linked on the day
alr I think I found it
#1198085850223878246 message
now i'll just hope the update come out before the tournament
Nice
@stray rampart so will you be able to participate today?
Something is happening today?
bnb tourney
you wanna participate?
xD
When's it starting
30 min
Does that mean I'm technically late to join? Usually it's like a 1 hour limit before things start
Fifteen minutes
@hollow socket btw what nickname do you prefer?
Nickname?
Yea for me to put in the bracket/use in my cast
The same one Saris used I guess
what was that?
I'll be streaming and recording the tournament in french
A friend will be watching my stream and commentating with me
In french
nice
I'll just need to stay in the lobby to spectate, I won't be in the same discord vc as you guys
as long as you do not lag thats fine
He used " TerraTron " for the tournaments
ah ok
We have one minute before starting
0
Who's going first
This is the bracket
build battle
Alright
I just woke back up.
My internets is still a little unstable. If I could reconnect after losing connection I'd play.
I am ready
Hmmm
are you on rc?
We're in PvP lobby - 9AK
the stream: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eIDiFJGlnAA
the password is chess
sorry for the delay
Hm
Wait a sec please
Wow it's the first time I've ever seen this channel used.
new bracket:
@stray rampart
@hollow socket doing your match first
are you playing?
doing another match first
Computer be loading, aaaaa. But I'm very likely to lose connection while playing.
we can try if you want?
