#New Back end stuff, and how its bad.
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
So, good players are turning you away from the game?
I know that there's an annoying meta and basically everyone aggrees that the game needs a huge balance patch, but EVEN THEN there will be some kind of meta, every game has it, you just gotta deal with it or wait for the devs to rebalance the game again.
The thing about "cracked player" is just skill issue honestly, this is a pvp shooter, a really good pvp shooter that gives a lot of control to the player instead of taking from them (cof COD cof).
Naro is just based
You also complain that "people with money/good equipment perform better", OF COURSE THEY DO, that's true for every single competitive game/sport that requires ANY sort of equipment.
It makes such a huge difference that I refuse to play shooters where I can't get at least 120fps, and even at 144 I can feel myself being held back and unable to properly translate my skill to the game.
What's your solution to that? cap the fps to 60 and cut the playerbase in half?
Also, your numbers are all over the place.
3/4 shots with the svd doesn't kill, and the enemy with the asval needed 8 to kill you despite that weapon needing only 3 and ignoring most armors in the game?
Your feedback feels so baseless.
Why is the title about back-end, but the content about client side performance?

The game always had a very low TTK. Nothing really changed.
This whole post makes no sense.
It's like you tried to cram 4 topics into one.
"I see less and less People using every gun and tool on hand and more and more SMG, M4 suppressed, AS VAL, And trolls, Lots and lots of trolls. " cause people learnt how to play the game and also learnt to play the meta
idk about the trolls
need more probably
a lot less people use proxy than when i first played
Let me say this and try to make its as serious as i can because Text does not display my intention clearly enough. "META's" Cause Cancer in a game. Its been that way for a few years now.
theres always going to be a meta in every game
luckily for me what I want to play is meta rn
true atleast the meta is fun
every game has a meta
if the meta was proning in a bush with bipod m249 support I think the game would be much less enjoyable
so be thankful it's not that
I'd rather Have the "meta" be Every gun other than SMG/ high DPS low damage guns. If it was a mix of assault rifles that dominated, and Not just the M4. The Meta is not the guns its the playstyle with those guns. Its Fire all your bullets faster then the other guy, its Zero Armor high speed barrel stuff in your face with and SMG so Armor RNG cant save anyone. That's just as Annoying as Bipod M249.
Worse is the "Meta" players using proxy to just shout "gamer words" at who ever they kill.
In case its not clear. This is whats personally happened to me, what those feedbacks based on. Im not getting a group consensise or some discord chat to foreword my thoughts threw.
the meta aint even m4, plus ak15 and hk are both meta
K then why did everyone i see and there damn dog have an M4 this time? Just that many new players in the Damn game both playtests?
As val*
This short test and the previousone, M4 has been the dominate gun ive seen pulling bullshit.
because its the first gun you unlock and many players just use it because they dont know how to change it
as val, vector, hk and ak 15 are the meta weapons atm
If As Val isn't the #1 gun for you, then idk if we're playing the same game.
It's all I get killed by, and the thing that just hands kills to me non-stop.
Vector for Cash Run tbh.
its quite good but can be limited for range
so on more open maps its not as good as hk
Living the CQC life.
Fuck Wakistan either way. Shit map.
hate the oil rig one, cant see nout and i get sniped by a guy 300 meters away
New Oil Dunes is fine tho.
didnt play new oil dunes
It's MUCH better.
Not even the same map anymore. tbh
M4 pulls stupid shit off that people complain about to much, an AR that snipes on full auto, everyone else using AS Val to being sneaky dicks inside my own dam spawn.
I never even see the M4. Not on Europe.
literally nobody uses the m4 apart from bad players in EU
cause its not good
EU servers are more tuned into the meta then NA
Guys. come on then why would I be brining it up if its not one of the guns pulling off stupid shit!?
As Val, AK and HK are about all there is.
true and even when you go up against it is a easier kill
Yeah so I wouldn't even know if they used it. lmao
idk it sounds like a skill issue to me, cause m4 is just not a good gun atm
If you're constantly dying to one of the worst weapons...I mean.
Ok, maybe not the worst, but it certainly ain't up there to be common.
Maybe you're just hanging out in the wrong corners.
Or NA really has a boner for M4.
if you got as val play as val no armour engineer cause that wins 9/10 times as long as you full health
Wrong corner? playing the objective and stopping back caps is the "wrong corner?"
According to most of my teams, yeah. 
are you laying in the open on objectives?
That's not acceptable.
No im hidding like a bitch behind every bit of cover from every sound of gun fire because most of them sound like AS VAL's right next to me.
Yes but we'll lose for it regardless. Can't very well report my entire team.
what level in game are you?
Fuck if i remember. Like high 60 or something. I know i don't have many guns left to unlocks. That's not the point . I like using the guns I use and I know what they should do to people if I get the first shot off. Yet this test just shattered everything i'd preestablished from every playtest ive played in the past.
I felt no difference.
that explains why you die easily to no armour engi
they don't have to aim if you sit in a corner
maybe you just played against better players cause this playtest was not scheldued so any people who like battlebit enough to be in the server or follow on twitter played
also I almost always try to use off meta weapons
and it barely makes a difference
the game other than a few guns is very balanced in terms of gun balance
I dont disagree with this.
I played with massive FPS drops for the first hour because my pepega brain forgot that BBR HATES window capture, and I still top scored hard.
Like, it's just a matter of who you go against.
yeah
I am lucky enough to never notice being killed by a no armour engi
but I have been using the fastest possible loadout since like march
i be saying people playing no armour engineer and they just charge head first into the enemy 💀
I hate this for so many reason. and non of them involve the game itself.
No Armor should be a 5 ticket lose for dying, its so stupid to play as Scout from TF2. But yet. I can shot one 4 times with a SVD and still loose the fight to someone with Zero Armor.
Bruh
Dont you start.
No you don't start that shit. 
I know what i saw, I know what i did.
no armour engineer people are dead weak, they are like 2-3 shot. they are very easy to kill if you can just aim decent enough. a majority of players though are like russians playing on crt monitors and are bad
No U
If you lose a head on fight with armor vs someone with none, that's honestly a massive skill issue.
Shoot that head.
If you miss, that's that.
deadass. no armour engineer is only effective if you flank. you can literally die from like 1 sniper bullet if you are slightly damaged
You're pretty much dead at any shot, because bleed is gonna finish you and you can't heal yourself.
No armor engi is just for cash run.
Everything else is griefing.
In Cash Run.
yeah cash run and for playing objectives, run in their and get the whole squad to spawn
In any mode with tickets...
You're much better of being able to heal yourself.
I just run to fights
If I was against evenly skilled opponents I wouldn't run it
honestly I'd probably run support
and hold angles or something
Medic just wins out outside of cash run, because you can stay in the fight longer.
thank god for russians
The respawn time easily fucks you over.
anything with self healing will always be good
luckily I have a squad full of mostly medic mains I play with
You're down?
Just hold Space.
None of those 5 medics 0m away from you will revive you.
medic will always be a solid pick
but that's why I never play medic
yeah you have to play medic
i only play medic during 10x exp when theres no vehicles, cause if you blow up a full tank in 10x exp thats like 60k exp
medic is great for when i jump from too high up
I honestly have better odds at reviving myself than hoping for a random medic to do it. 
on engi i just gotta deal with playing at 20% hp
i play solo as no armour engineer and i just scream that i need healing to a medic
How often does that work? 1/50 times?
doesnt mean i play medic innit
bruh. What skill tier is this game running because I get farmed by near by medics to revive me and everyone else every game...
half your team is med
You're def not an EU gamer.
EU medics do not exist.
two thirds of mine was medic.
yeah but i dont play with med clan, i play solo or with some irl friends
ok
I often revive like half a dozen people back to back.
Then go down and not a single one even pretends to try and revive me.

ye
If I revive someone instead of gunning down the enemy, I am the one who is certain to die.
time to move to Another country with useful medics
Yeah but then they might all start using M4.
Would you rather that then AS VAL spam?
that cause m4 is a bad gun so its easy to go up against
Easier kills for me, no doubt.
Ak15 ain't meta at all wym
nah trust ong
that can be said about every gun though
what guns?
Wym?
I see over a dinner, This chat has yet to come around to my point of view. well then. Ill say it. Naro is right. AK15 Is not Meta. Its not an SMG so its not for cool kids.
I don't se the point of this thread.
It starts with saying that the new backend is bad (?).
Then it becomes about the meta.
Then it becomes about "other players being good" or something.
Idk anymore.
Here is what it started as. New back end stuff. makes the game from my personal view of it. act and preform great. It felt like A major improvement and i saw noticeable issues with my Old and lower end rig now gone. I was on the same playing field as everyone else. I was doing good. But Then I saw the "META" shit really hitting hard because everyone was using the same stupid overused Idea to play the game when the Dev's need A mixture of Data to work on. hello! if everyone uses the same damn guns and game play to be the COD comp nerds then the game becomes a COD Comp game. See what im saying? I play Non Meta to have the Extra Data the game needs. But apparently i'm not alone in feeling the curb stomping from trying to play how I want to play.
The meta has nothing to do with backend
You're basically saying:
"The apples are sweet, which makes the oranges sour"
Like ????
Two independent variables
And idk why you're mentioning "competitive CoD", that game is scripted and shit.
Every shooter has a meta and we know it.
I keep complaining about it lmao
i too am confused
But trying to corelate "good backend" with "good players playing the meta" is just nonsensical
i dont like saying this but this unironically sounds like a skill issue
The meta is a real concern though, it IS getting annoying.
But everything else that he's saying just makes 0 sense.
Which brings us back to my previous response.
This thread doesn't even know its own topic.
🗿
all he oki needs to do is slightly nerf engineer speed and slightly buff support speed innit
yeah cause OP crammed like 4 topics into one thing
Im trying to make this as simple as possible, and i keep having to rethink how to write it.
I have a thread that talks about doing this in a very simple way.
indeed i have read it
But weapons also need rebalancing.
Not just a nerf here and a buff there.
I'm talking about a complete overhaul.
im just happy the meta is fun, could have been playing support and standing next to 8 bipods with a l86 whilst camping a window
Why did i even bother trying to put in feedback, When i could have went digging for Someone's post that matched my feelings and posted in a likely dead or quiet chat.
none of understand your point, either you are complaining about the meta, or complaining about the backend that works fine. but the meta and backend aren't directly correlated
The feedback is. "Good backend changes made the currently unbalanced game VERY unbalanced." As Naro said it. game needs an overhaul and For the first time im seeing that after Oki's recent changes.
Did he say that tho? 
1st: the backend has nothing to do with it.
2nd: the meta has been stabilished for quite a while.
but the backend is not related to the meta? i just think you went up against good players for the first time as the test was less known about
so less casuals joined
We both know you're trolling. 
That is true.
The mini voxel tests were hell
also people had 4 weeks to prepare and see what loadouts they liked
Some tweaking would be alright, but you just can't have perfect balance.
innit, csgo which is arguably the most balanced game atm still needs balancing changes and like 90% of guns minus eco rounds are ak, m4, or awp, metas will always be prevalent
But I toke part in a mini test with lower population numbers before and came out fine not feeling This mess this time.
That's a game in which pretty much anything is one shot kill to the head.
That's the balance.
Not perfect, it's because there's no reference model for balancing.
Some weapons are just much better than others with basically no drawbacks, others are the opposite, others make no sense when you loom at the real life counterparts
was it one during the middle of the night for eu?
and if so thats why
Some small tweaking would fix that.
No whole rebalance needed.
No. last one was morning time On EST.
how long ago was it?
If you do some small tweaking here, other weapons may get shafted or have their spot taken, and then you will have to balance those to make them "fit", and the cycle continues.
It's better to just make a reference model and balance all the weapons at once, comparing them to one-another and based on the reference model.
My arbitrary balancing can fix this.
Hmm. Lets see. might have been 3 months ago. I missed two play tests from moving and spending all my savings on someone hospital stay.
thats why then, 3 months ago barely anybody was playing the meta
New fast engi+val meta came with the armor update
Back then it was the ak74
But ppl were already learning how to run'n gun with smgs and the val
I know i played the update when Armor was adjusted. just have been two months then. because I remember being really pissed off about getting run down by engies with SMG's running and mock 5.
I felt like the performance improvement's from then to now seemed pretty significant from last time, Considering my PC is likely a 8 of the power of the next losest makes PC here. It was an good improvement but damn if i didn't feel the Meta gun's hurt more this time.
Well, Oki did optimize the game further since then, but that didn't affect already good players and it still has nothing to do with the backend
T^T Fine.
ill shut up now.
M4 was never meta
Always been ak74 long barrel meta
And if you feel like being a cunt then aug heavy barrel is dumb
And if we're being funni the fucking val outranges the ak74 because oki
This game can run on a potato, are people with bad PC's seriously an issue in Battlebit? I've seen this argument made in every single battlefield game fyi
The thread makes no sense in the first place, don't question it.
true this fella crammed 3 topics into one and was wrong about all 3
"Back end bad"
Proceeds to talk about weapon balancing, skill gaps and hardware differences