#sitelen pona sin: sitelen Sona ante
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
but anyway sona’s glyph is just an example of what it means
it’s okay if the glyph doesn’t cover all aspects of its semantic space - it doesn’t need to
btw - this is often how isipin is written
That's your calling a song a lipu
sure
lipamanka “a plucked chicken is a man” lipman
a paper, website, and oral tradition are all lipu to me
one of these things is not like the other
yeah websites store things on computers
not like the other two, which use far older preservation methods
and websites are often altered a lot
i think using lipu to refer to a storyteller is actually really cool
So I get what you're saying about the glyph not needing to encompass every sense of the word. An ilo is an ilo regardless of whether it's a hammer, a wrench, a screwdriver, or an internal combustion engine. However
While a hammer is an example of a tool, a shining book is not an example of knowledge
which is great because lipu means book, not knowledge
emitters don’t mean “shiny” lol they are showing the thing under them is emitting something
Wait until I'm done talking before you make your bad-faith retorts, ok?
books emit knowledge, hands emit things = giving, mouths emit sound, etc
The only connection between sona and lipu is the notion that you get one out of the other
so the act of a lipu giving sona id an example of sona, no?
Indeed, the sona that you get out of a lipu is indeed sona. But there are entire cultures out there that do not record knowledge in books.
In Western culture, the association between knowledge and books is very strong. If you do a Google Image search for "knowledge", many of the pictures you will find will show books.
But if you take it out of that context, the connection breaks down
i have never once used livestock to trade - i only have used paper, coins, and numbers in computers. however the symbol for mani is livestock
not to mention that books and literacy are not a western concept
the maya had books. the chinese had books. before contact with europe
Ok, so the context in which it works is not exclusively restricted to Western culture
But there are context where it doesn't work and I think it is rather biased to invoke an association with books and paper in a glyph for the abstract concept of knowledge
i don’t think this is a huge problem personally
Great. I'm not suggesting that the glyph by prescriptively replaced. I'm suggestions an alternative
In the vein of
pakala
1 not 2
this
but meli1 is more western than the normal meli glyph
yea i designed that glyph and the font it’s in
Yes, but the good thing about the Venus sign and Mars sign variants of meli and mije is that they do not invoke normative gender images like "women have long hair" and "men have broad shoulders", right?
i always saw the meli glyph as a woman with a hijab
i mean the isipin one has the laws facing the normal direction, this one has it reversed
so it’s not exactly the same
but that prolly makes it more confusing
damn i never considered sona as lipu with emitters
never connected it because sona is square and lipu is a bit taller
Coming from a culture with a strong oral tradition, I see no problem with calling an oral story or record lipu, and actually greatly dislike the idea that it must be separate. If you call other stories and records lipu then you can call OT lipu.
only because it invokes a non-sequitur.. women do not have long hair they are the planet venus
this is why i made objective meli mije tonsi glyphs
"objective"
Except they do - it’s a hand mirror and a shield and spear, which is arguably worse
Yes, if you go back to their roots, but to most people these days, the Mars sign just means "male" and the Venus sign just means "female". In Baudrillardian terms, it's a stage 4 simulacrum. The original sitelen for meli and mije directly invoke the images of a broad-shouldered man and a long-haired woman; they are only a stage 2 simulacrum.
btw, did anyone mention this is the same glyph as isipin
ok
there
anyway, oral traditions AND physical paper can be included in lipu just like currency AND large domesticated animals can be included in mani
it sounds like you're saying "we should change kili because not all fruits are apples"
wait aren't they closest to the actual words mije meli tonsi?
Words yes
Concepts no
context told me the meaning
tbh saying that oral communication is not lipu is showing more bias towards cultures who mainly use written records
Yeah it feels more othering to me tbh
Idk if the thread/glyph creator is from a culture with a strong oral tradition though
how would you say a story, regardless of it is written down or not?
Given context, “toki”
I've never used “lipu” to mean “story”
one of the definitions of lipu is record, and oral communication is still a record,
Define "record"
from Google:
a thing constituting a piece of evidence about the past, especially an account kept in writing or some other permanent form.
Oral tradition absolutely can be a record of history, events, and experiences, and can be just as reliable as non-oral methods of recording and passing on knowledge.
I would also use lipu to describe oral tradition as well as stories.
to you, what makes oral record different from a book
What excludes oral record from being lipu
you could say the same about mije and meli tbh like i don’t see a huge difference
but anyway yea i would stop trying to explain why oral traditions aren’t part of lipu and change your concept of lipu
for someone who’s putting effort towards de-westernifying this, i don’t see your current approach as effective
Would you consider sending letters to a pen pal as toki or as lipu first?
To me, a record is something in which you record information. I would not call your memory a record
If the only difference was between being written down
Why?
"record" suggests something external
Does it?
to me, it does
you’re saying that oral tradition is less trustworthy than writing things down, no?
I would not call your memory a record
i would like to know your opinions on the importance of the things recorded on paper vs things passed down in oral tradition
because
"record" suggests something external
Do you come from a culture with a strong oral tradition?
Where in the definition does it say that
Why does it have to be external
i mean not really. record comes from a word that means remember. semantic shift is real but in this case descriptively that implication isn’t that strong
in many dialects of english, remember can be a transitive verb that means “remind”
these things are squishy even in english
so idk why english should be so important to lipu when it already doesn’t work
Is talking to someone else not external?
Oral tradition is cited by even western anthropologists and archeologists as a historical record equal to or even stronger than the reliability of written records
[Reply to:](#1110645714054299748 message) To me, a record is something in which you record information. I would not call your memory a recor…
@drowsy bear
I'm not answering that
Why not?
i mean based on what you’ve said i’m going to assume no. if that’s wrong then lmk but you don’t get to ambiguously be part of an oppressed group
ough
hey
is it moku if you dont use your mouth to eat something
i guess what is used for eating can be called a mouth
people who have never experienced other methods of nutrients used for people who can’t eat using their mouth: “no!!!”
Like I’m gonna be honest, I’m trying to be charitable here but it feels like you are creating an issue from a non-issue with a misunderstanding of what oral tradition is and your attempt to “fix” it is just othering and has undertones of devaluing oral tradition and otherwise weird and bad vibes. If you’d like to have a conversation about this I’m willing to share my knowledge and expertise of oral tradition (open only, of course) but I need to know what I’m working with here and if you’re actually open to listening. Otherwise I don’t want to waste my time.
@drowsy bear you do need to respond to this at least.
The reason why I'm not answering is because I do not believe my cultural background is, or should be, relevant to this discussion. That is called ad hominem, and I will not tolerate it. Nor am I comfortable participating in a discussion where people are going to fixate on the perceived undertones of what I'm saying rather than the substance of the points themselves.
For the record*, others in this thread have made compelling arguments have been presented for how the term lipu may well be perfectly applicable to oral tradition, in the sense that it refers a preserved body of information. I will rethink my understanding of this term.
* Case in point—even common usage of the term “record” seems broader than I thought.
whether or not you have a cultural background that makes use of oral tradition is absolutely relevant to whether or not the way you categorize oral traditions to make your point is informed or sensitive. when people who are from cultures with strong oral traditions are trying to tell you that they categorize them as lipu, it's patronizing to cite oral traditions as an example of why you don't like the inclusion of the lipu glyph in the sona glyph
im sorry but asking if you’re white is not ad homonym
it's not ad hominem to suggest that people who are not members of a culture don't have insight over and above members of that culture who are actively taking part in the conversation
yes, this question was asked to gain an understanding of your understanding of oral tradition from your own experiences, and was fully appropriate for the conversation
"You’re ____; what do you know?" is absolutely ad hominem. If I am wrong, tell me why I'm wrong.
people’s past experiences actually do inform their knowledge of things
including being in a culture
Your opinions are not formed in a vacuum
[Reply to:](#1110645714054299748 message) "You’re ____; what do you know?" is absolutely ad hominem. If I am wrong, tell me why I'm wrong.
it's not an ad hominem because it's ridiculous to think that you understand someone's entire culture more than they do when they live in it 24/7.... i would dismiss cis people for trying to explain trans stuff to me, or men for trying to explain womanhood etc etc. there are many cases where people have no reason to value your perspective more than their own lived experiences
as homonym is specifically an insult. is it insulting to say that you don’t have those lived experiences?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
Typically this term refers to a rhetorical strategy where the speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.
Ad hominem (Latin for 'to the person'), short for argumentum ad hominem, is a term that refers to several types of arguments, most of which are fallacious. Typically this term refers to a rhetorical strategy where the speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than attacking the substan...
no one is attacking your character, people are just asking you whether you have [lived experience] which informs your opinions on oral tradition
by knowing that this conversation will be easier to have and come to an understanding
we are a community dedicated to a language that in no small part is about playing with semantic space and rethinking the categories embedded in the languages we speak. this is a wonderful opportunity to ask "what is text?" and you are drawing the line at "things recorded using exactly any Western colonial technology of record keeping" instead of engaging with the diversity of recording technologies that people in this channel have greater access to than you to inform your perspective
"i think of a record as something external" is not a neutral statement
the ways you choose to categorize concepts inherently forward a thesis
whenever i read any academic paper in college, it’s always encouraged and sometimes required to research the author beforehand and learn about them. this is because opinions and research do not exist in a vacuum at all. everything about you informs everything else about you, whether you recognize it or not
it is very helpful to know an arguer’s background because it informs their argument so much. it helps let you know why they might have formed the opinions they did
this DOES relate to the substance though??
like it's "why are you doing this"
one of the reasons: "do you come from strong oral tradition culture"
possible reasons i mean
What you're describing here—ignoring someone who is cissplaining to you—is not an ad-hominem argument because it isn't an argument at all. It's just you identifying a discussion as fruitless and leaving. If you say "stfu terf" on the way out, that's just a parting remark
.
ad homonym . .
it's a reasonable grounds to think that someone is incorrect
But note that it also ends the discussion. If you don't want to end the discussion, why invoke a dead end?
wdym end the discussion
I’m asking for clarification before we talk, trying to identify whether this discussion is fruitless, not argue.
jan Wiwi i think ur “not part of a culture with a strong oral tradition” is showing
like you can continue with "what experience on this do you have"
You’ve been basically ignoring me the entire thread so I don’t have high hopes but I do try to be charitable
whenever people bring up fallacies i get a little tireder because i know i’m going to be having a battle of logic instead of a dance of ideas
(just bring up the fallacy fallacy 😛 )
i don’t want to contribute to logical battle discourse tbh
janet has muted them
LBD
Everything you’ve said so far comes off to me as being an outsider and speaking for cultures you’re not a part of, but if you are from an OT culture and maybe just don’t understand the history and importance, (like maybe you’re young) that informs the way I’m going to approach the conversation
coining the term LBD
btw this says
Ad hominem... is a term that refers to several types of arguments, most of which are fallacious.
If you’re just a white person saying OT isn’t lipu then I’m going to approach that differently than I would an Indigenous youth who has been inundated with ideas that our methods of knowledge keeping are less valuable or strange, etc.
a okay
[Reply to:](#1110645714054299748 message) janet has muted them
ike ala a
Anyways I’m
if ppl have questions about oral tradition I would be very happy to answer
So my thoughts on this are
oral stories and oral knowledge definitely can be on a lipu
And yet I don't think I'd use it - unless the context is giving me strong vibes - because I think I'd have a hard time... identifying the lipu? Like, sure, in a way, it's something you hold in your own memory, but I assume it's also mixed with memory that's not your own??? Not sure if I'm making sense (and maybe I'm also simply wrong)
why steal when you can forgery instead
ah
here is an ancient mystical tsalagi legend
so there’s this old guy
and he turns to a young guy
“there are two wolves inside and f you
it's also in the collective memory though. and it could get mixed up but like you can also spill coffee on a book or corrupt a hard drive, every medium can have errors. idk if im misunderstanding what you're saying tho
generally oral traditions are reliable though at retaining data long term with minimal change over time, afaik
Yes, that's what I meant.
The issue is more that I can't really think of the lipu as an entity in this case?
I have an abstraction in my mind of a file representing specific knowledge
I don't currently have that abstraction for data-residing-in-shared-self-memory-and-collective-memory
idea
but like i guess mi la the lipu is the thing recorded not the medium it's recorded on. if i have a document on my puter and print it kut I don't go "ah, new document" i go "same document! now it's printed"
so similarly, where the lipu is in an oral tradition seems tangential to me to the question of like. identifying the lipu
mi la lipu is the medium specifically
what i would call the thing recorded varies on what it is
Document and content of document isn't the same for me
similarly for oral traditions that were later written down. parts of the Tanakh for example have many of the characteristics of oral tradition because they were that for a while, AFAIK. also see the Hadith
we talk about them like they are :p don't try and tell me you ask people "hey can you print off the content of that document into a new document for me?"
That's English for you 🤷
but if they aren't, why not? the medium is a huge part of the context of the document and informs the content of it, but the content is its own thing at the same time
so is the doc
the boundaries of medium are porous
yeah
yea that sounds like something i’d say
like if i have two identical copies of the same document in the same medium, are they the same document?
yea but is jan Ke Tami autistic like you? idk jan Ke Tami are you autistic
I think I can change the content of the doc while the doc stays the same entity
And I can give the content of the doc to a different medium whith the content staying the same thing
i’m not autistic
ok
i’m normal
Not sure how to answer that. I guess the answer is "no"
(just adhd)
i’m not autistic im like autistic
there’s a difference
the like is doing something there
something important
very important
no
nasin nasa
if i have two copies of toki pona the lang of good by lang are they the same book
or are they different books
is “document” a classifier
is “content” a classifier
what is god
why am i snails
same as in exactly one item and same as in similar are the same word in English
mi la the difference between lipu and toki is if it’s one way or two way
So, oral tradition relies heavily off of collective memory but also specific methods of storytelling to keep it faithful and accurate. Storykeepers like myself (though I am much more in-training and will likely never “complete” it) are often chosen and taught from a young age both the stories themselves and how to adapt it to different audiences while keeping it faithful to the original. It is greatly frowned upon to change them for your own gain, so it’s not really a concern, at least in my Nation and the ones of my friends. They usually rely a lot on specific rhythms and cues to keep it easily memorizable.
Here’s an article about how Inuit oral tradition helped scientists find the HMS Erebus and HMS Terror that may be interesting and is certainly relevant
https://ictnews.org/archive/the-inuit-were-right-shipwreck-find-confirms-168-year-old-oral-history
[Reply to:](#1110645714054299748 message) So my thoughts on this are
oral stories and oral knowledge definitely can be on a lipu
And yet I don…
yeah, see, that makes it sound like the teaching is part of what the lipu is
which isn't really something I'd say I have had the same experience with
and so I'm going to keep being unsure of talking about the lipu itself, if that makes sense
Websites are considered lipu, but they are practically immaterial, so what about a website makes it lipu?
Yeah
but not only
That's the thing I'm having trouble with, it's not a fixed idea I can connect in my mind for some reason
Writing down a story is lipu-ing, correct?
perhaps a more dynamic less emulating-printed-document website would not be as lipu-y
potential examples:
- that one mindmap graph tp dictionary
- corru.observer (visual novel with rpg elements)
- youtube
- ,,audiobooks?
theyre deliberately aiming to replicate physical lipu
i haven’t seen anyone call discord lipu Siko
now you have
eh it works imo
It also doesn’t need to be called a lipu
a locked Discord server is a lipu for sure
lipu Siko reflects the worrying trend of moving documentation onto a vc-funded invite-only platform
i try to avoid lipu for,, webapps i suppose
sites where the main interaction isn't reading static text
reddit is a ma to me because it's a gathering place for people to share and discuss lipuojn
A tweet would be a lipu but the app would be an ilo
a tweet would be more of a toki to me
not sure how to articulate the why
i guess,, off-the-cuff, conversation-like, not meant as a permanent record (even though it ends up as such)
Idk I think that it’s a lipu but like a reply thread would be a toki?
Maybe
It’s getting fuzzy
i think a tweet is mu
True
the contents of a reply thread in a non-thread form would likely be a lipu to me
but the format makes it,, hm
ilo threadreader li lipu e toki
Actually maybe as long as its an open discussion it’s a toki but if you can’t contribute to it then it’s a lipu?
First, at least
That makes some sense to me! Twitter is closer to a lipu for me, simply because I don't use it and therefore it's not as immediately an ilo to me
The semantic space in which lipu and toki define (?) overlaps a bunch which all the more proves that oral records can be lipu
What if toki was a group of lipu that respond to each other??
The lipu is the friends we made along the way - literally
Like but statements are just records right? Like “I ate salad”? That’s a lipu right?? And since memories are also records then saying “was it good?” Is recording it to your mind so you are lipu-ing???
if you go full deterministic, you and everything around you is a lipu, I guess?
i think if the main interaction is to present a text (for a very wide definition of text) it's a lipu
so a visual novel is a lipu, an audiobook is a lipu. a movie is a lipu. but discord is not a lipu, because this isn't a text, it's a conversation
very fair, visual novels are isomorphic to choose-your-own-adventure books
like you wouldn't do literary analysis of ma pona but you can do literary analysis of night in the woods the same as a physical book
is façade (video game) a lipu
i haven't played it. maybe
it has prerecorded voice lines but it also tries to be a conversation but it heavily railroads it
i mean you can put the reader in the context of a conversation in a text
mimicking a conversation as a medium is not the same as having an actual conversation. it's still authored, and has direction
is chatgpt a lipu
vs a real conversation like you and I are having is just a Thing that's happening. it's like the difference between writing a scene in a story about someone waiting at a bus stop vs me waiting there in real life. there's not point when i do it in real life, there isn't a thesis it's just happening because it's real
chatgpt is not a lipu lol
that's a conversation too
Is life itself a lipu
not as a whole i don't think. there's no story that the whole universe makes up
Is the concept of time and space a lipu
you can interpret one but then you are writing a work of interpretation of life, not life as-is
same as a memoir is a lipu but those things just happening to someone is not
it's the way you contextualize the experiences to form a perspective that can be dialogued with
I started too high there’s no where to go
lol
Is a piece of paper a lipu
is the recording of a natural unscripted conversation a lipu
is a urinal an art piece
am I a piece of work
you sure are
i think it becomes text by the act (and therefore decision) of recording
Okay new introduction to this space
Since "lipu" is used ime frequently to refer to something that is physically like a document (leaves for instance), could this be extended to other forms of lipu?
What I'm thinking of is like
Could a braid or a knotted thing be a lipu in some contexts?
I'm thinking of uh https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quipu#/media/File:Inca_Quipu.jpg
Quipu (also spelled khipu) are recording devices fashioned from strings historically used by a number of cultures in the region of Andean South America.A quipu usually consisted of cotton or camelid fiber strings. The Inca people used them for collecting data and keeping records, monitoring tax obligations, collecting census records, calendrical...
These aren't used contemporarily I don't think from what I can tell but
What abt other fabric arts
What about scrimshaw? Can bone be a lipu in the right context
what about beads in #1092527158724931644 a
yessss
