#LIPAMANKA PI FONT ALA
1 messages ¡ Page 5 of 1
some of them have LEXICALIZED UNRELATED MEANINGS AS DIFFERENT PARTS OF SPEECH
whatever
we'll see what we can do
like which
ale is defined seperately as an adjective and a noun
V>N>V
V alasa to hunt
N alasa something that is hunted (?) (does this work? does this mean that alasa has been reanalyzed as something?) OR the act of hunting (this one works... okay)
V alasa to use something hunted on (yeah this one doesn't work) OR to use the act of hunting on (this doesn't work either lol)
V>N>V doesn't work?
V>N>V
V kalama to make a sound
N sound (okay this one works and is also cool wow) OR the act of making a sound
V to use a sound on something (this one does not work) OR to use the act of making a sound on (this is nonsense)
V>N>V doesn't work
okay one more
V>A>N
V>A>N
V pali to make
A pali that makes, that is for making, that is related to making
N pali something that has the quality of making, something that has the quality of being for making, something that has the quality of being related to making
can pali mean "thing that is making?" no I don't think so. let's try one more to make sure.
V>A>N
V pana to give
A pana that gives, that is for giving, that is related to giving
N pana that which gives, that which is for giving, that which is related to giving
this one does not work.
V>A>N does not work
wait I only have one more left
then I'll HAVE to go to bed
V>A>V
V>A>V
V toki to talk
A toki that talks, that is for talking, that is related to talking
V toki to make something a thing that talks, to make something a thing that is for talking, to make something a thing that is related to talking
can "mi toki e lipu" mean "I make this book talk?" no.
V>A>V doesn't work
okay time to compile my three long results
N = noun
- N>A>N = N
- N>V>N = not allowed
A = adjective - A>N>A = related to something that has quality A
- A>V>A = that makes something A, that is for making something A, that is related to making something A
V = verb - V>N>V = not allowed
- V>A>V = not allowed
N>A = of N, related to N, has the qualities of N
- N>V>A = that uses N (on something), that applies N (to something)
N>V = to use N on, to apply N to - N>A>V = to make something related to N, to make something have the qualities of N
A>N = something that has the quality of A - A>V>N = A>N
A>V = to make something have the quality of A - A>N>V = to use something that has quality A on (something), to apply something of quality A to (something)
V>N = something that V applies to OR the act of V - V>A>N = not allowed
V>A = that does V, that is for V, that is related to V - V>N>A = V>A
final rules
to condence:
N = noun (that's it lol)
A = adjective, related to something of quality A, that makes something have quality A, that is for making something have quality A, that is related to making something have quality A
V = verb (that's it!)
N>A = related to N, has the qualities of N, that uses N on something, that applies N to something
N>V = to use N on, to apply N to, to make something related to N, to make something have the qualities of N
A>N = something of quality A
A>V = to make something have quality A, to use something that has quality A on (something), to apply something of quality A to (something)
V>N = something that V applies to OR the act of V
V>A = that does V, that is for V, that is related to V
one example for each part of speech:
TENPO
noun: time (+duration, moment, occasion, period, situation)
adjective: related to time, having the qualities of time, that uses time on something, that applies time to something
verb: to use time on, to apply time to, to make something related to time, to make something have the qualities of time
PONA
noun: something good
adjective: good, related to something good, that makes something good, that is for making things good, that is related to making things good
verb: to make something good, to use/apply something good on/to something
OLIN
noun: something that is loved OR the act of loving
adjective: that loves, that is for loving, that is related to love
verb: to love
finding and using these, I also found some examples that didn't work as well. I'm planning on exploring why they don't work as well tomorrow. I suspect it might be because of semantic drift or that their base part of speech has changed
I also have to do the four longs tomorrow
đ o kalama ala e mi
mi toki e waso đŚ
waso ni li kama waso toki
crossed out are the ones that DO NOT work
N>A>N>A
N>A>N>V
N>A>V>N
N>A>V>A
N>V>N>A
N>V>N>V
N>V>A>N
N>V>A>V
A>N>A>N
A>N>A>V
A>N>V>N
A>N>V>A
A>V>N>A
A>V>N>V
A>V>A>N
A>V>A>V
V>N>A>N
V>N>A>V
V>N>V>N
V>N>V>A
V>A>N>A
V>A>N>V
V>A>V>N
V>A>V>A
so tomorrow I have to do
N>A>V>A
N>V>A>V
A>N>A>V
A>N>V>A
V>N>A>V
V>N>V>A
V>A>V>A
and then I will (maybe?) be done!
if not and some of them work, I will have to test a handful of five longs!
but the number I have to test will continue to go down, because for each one that passes there are only two new ones I need to check after. and lukin la most of them have deminishing returns
diminishing
so
I'm gonna resist my urge to stay up and keep doing this bc I gotta get up in nine hours so GOOD NIGHT
tonight was great
FINAL RESULTS
N = noun (that's it lol)
A = adjective, related to something of quality A, that makes something have quality A, that is for making something have quality A, that is related to making something have quality A (an adjective is a lot more than just its core meaning, it turns out)
V = verb (that's it! verbs are just verbs)
N>A = related to N, has the qualities of N, that uses N on something, that applies N to something
N>V = to use N on, to apply N to, to make something related to N, to make something have the qualities of N
A>N = something of quality A
A>V = to make something have quality A, to use something that has quality A on (something), to apply something of quality A to (something)
V>N = something that V applies to OR the act of V
V>A = that does V, that is for V, that is related to V
one example for each part of speech:
TENPO
noun: time (+duration, moment, occasion, period, situation)
adjective: related to time, having the qualities of time, that uses time on something, that applies time to something
verb: to use time on, to apply time to, to make something related to time, to make something have the qualities of time
PONA
noun: something good
adjective: good, related to something good, that makes something good, that is for making things good, that is related to making things good
verb: to make something good, to use/apply something good on/to something
OLIN
noun: something that is loved OR the act of loving
adjective: that loves, that is for loving, that is related to love
verb: to love
see above for proofs
I will. eventually type this all out and include proofs
now if i really want to prove everything, i would need to do it for every word (which is possible but. hhhh) (or i could get a computer to do it for me)
i will also try to design my polls from now on to collect data to verify how accurate this is
bc you can do a lot of logic and then the word just isnât really used like that
but there are ingrained rules in the language and we can find them and use them to help teach
@jagged osprey question: do you remember if you had any of this in mind when you were making pu or the lexicon?
holy hell
my brain is sort of kind of exploding reading all of this but very interesting stuff
that would mean that people understand âmi lape e ijoâ as âi sleepâ
hm
verbs can be defined as something with two arguments, corresponding to the subject and object
adjectives can be defines as something with one argument, corresponding to the head (if modifier) or subject (if predicate)
nouns have zero arguments
maybe?
yeah i just gotta figure out whatâs going on with lape
lape is an adjective
as with awen and pu and a few others that translate as âverbsâ
yeah thatâs what i notice
the adjectives in english they all mean are gerunds in english
oh also i didnât use preverbs because they have different meanings
@urban fractal whatâs the A>N for lape
i tried to describe the patterns i saw in my usage
oh cool! thatâs useful information
hm iâve been thinking about lape
A>N is âthat which has quality Aâ right
but this doesnât work for all adjectives
A lili small
N lili thing that is small i.e. a small thing
A lape resting
N that which is resting i.e. resting thing
A sewi holy
N sewi that which is holy i.e. god
A anpa lowly
N anpa that which is lowly i.e. space below something, thing below something
A ante different
N ante thing that is different i.e. other thing, something else
A ala not
N ala that which is not i.e. nothingness
A ike bad
N ike that which is bad (badness)
A jaki (basically the same as above)
A jelo yellow
N jelo that which is yellow (yellowness, the color yellow)
which of these are true
some of them are definitely true and others are up for debate
it seems like all preverbs are adjectives
oh except lukin
wile isnât written in as anything except preverb
âthe act of sleepingâ or (though this seems rare) âthat which is sleepingâ
that doesnât fit the pattern though
i agree thatâs how itâs used
but it doesnât fit in with the A>N patter
n
unless that comes from a four long derivation?
like loje isnât âthe act of being redâ as a noun is it
these two are the two patterns
it can be
âloje tomo li ponaâ can be âthat the house is red is goodâ
i think âaction of Vâ and âquality of ADJâ are effectively the same thing
(maybe)
gtg
pu doesnât have âthe act of being Aâ for A>N
i think this is true for loje
but i want to explore more things yeah?
and lape for âsleeping thingâ is not used, i donât think
i think generally the A > N âthat which is Xâ pattern is allowed in pu but very rare in current usage
Hm, "that which is not" to me doesn't take the same path as "nothingness"
Maybe like "that which is resting" is not taking the same path as "restfulness"
That said there's a disconnect in how I see part of ala, where "not" fits into my pseudoparticle impression and is related but slightly separate from the content word
i see ala as (1) a modifier-like particle that negates what it comes after or (2) a content word meaning ânon-existentâ
this seems to be the second one, used as a noun
I don't think it's that rare
pu describes "that which is not (i.e. nothingness)" so
we're talking about that
what pu does
but yeah sewi and ala are used for god and void
according to the recent poll it seems rare
ken
yes I mean like
I would like to test out LITERALLY EVERY SINGLE ADJECTIVE
however
I am in PORUTUGESE CLASS
AULA DE PORTUGUES
so I cannot do that because I have ot be excited about portuguese
I am so excited for when you finish discussing this and compile it into one place because I am not reading all that
@maiden light
what does the > mean in this
becomes
What I was saying is that it seems like some of the transformations lump two types of transformations into one - thus meaning you need to test out both hyptohesies and also meaning that its unclear which you used when doing the transformation.
I was trying to propose creating a different notation for them such that they did not clash like that.
e.g.
V-N (one type of transformation)
V~N (another type of transformation)
Yes this creates more complicated chains but might also illucidate others and suggest more cases where chains can be collapsed by being a bit clearer.
Also perhaps indicating what and how many steps were collapsed might produce some clear results.
Is there a list of the basic transformations anywhere? found it, copied it for my own use
@floral crescent ^
(feel free to answer this when not tired)
othank you for typing thsi
ive been using the notation of (lowercase letter to show derivation)(uppercase to show resulting PoS)
sN, qN, oN, uV, mV, vA, nA
what does each mean
reminder đ
i do actually test out each
gimme a sec to long post
N>A (N-A, N~A, N:A, N;A)
N>V (N:V, N;V, N-V, N~V)
A>N (A~N)
A>V (A~V, A:V, A;V)
V>N (V;N, V^N)
V>A (V^A, V:A, V-A)
: use (utility transformation)
; apply (application transformation)
- relate (relational transformation)
~ quality (qualitative transformation)
^ reference (referential transformation)
Based on;
N>A = related to N, has the qualities of N, that uses N on something, that applies N to something
N>V = to use N on, to apply N to, to make something related to M, to make something have the qualities of N
A>N = something of quality A
A>V to make something have quality A, go use something that has quality A on something, to apply skmething of quality A to something
V>N = something that appleis to, the act of V
V>A = that does V, that is for V, that is related to the act of doing V
(reference (^)= the meaning stays pretty much the same but the technical case of the word alters, e.g. V^N (the act of V), V is still an action here it is just being reffered to as if it were a noun. so N refers to the act of V but as a noun)
this is intended to allow clarification of which transformation is taking place
@floral crescent ^
thank u iâll read this when i switch back from font to book
âthat which is Xâ like sewi for âdivine beingâ
âquality or action of Xâ like pona for âgoodnessâ or pali for âworkâ (undecided whether merging these two makes sense)
âthat which is Xâdâ like moku for âfoodâ
âuse X onâ like luka for âtouchâ
âmake ⌠be Xâ like tawa for âmove (something)â
âis doing Xâ or âis being Xâdâ like lukin for âseenâ or âseeingâ
âof/related to Xâ like jan for â(something) belonging to someoneâ
those are not clear lol jan Seli you
you gotta write these things out
(iâm being lighthearted)
ough
if ur gonna be doing mathy things the priority is always gonna be âeasy to understand what means what at a glanceâ no
sN(A) = S is definite S.X
qN(A, V) = S is existence of X
oN(V) = S is potential O.X
uV(N) = S uses X on O
mV(A) = S makes O be S.X
vA(V) = S is S.X / S is O.X
nA(N) = S is of S.X
i made it worse
(didnt have time to write a better explanation shdksks bye)
thatâs fine! ur doing cool things
yo lipamanka and Seli what's ur new conlang called?? looks sweet
itâs toki pona
a a a
lojban-lookin-ass analysis
true
doing this literally made me interested in lojban again and iâve been studying it a bit the past two days
jgalu means claw?
I'm trying to decode this but I am struggling
actually no I realise I figured it out
okay
so
sN(A) = S is definite S.X = A~N
qN(A, V) = S is existence of X = A^N & V^N
oN(V) = S is potential O.X = V;N
uV(N) = S uses X on O = N:V
mV(A) = S makes O be S.X = A~V
vA(V) = S is S.X / S is O.X = V^A
nA(N) = S is of S.X = N-A
interestingly, lipamanka identifies more transformations per category than you do, but you identify ones ona hasn't (e.g. A^N and V^N)
N>A = related to N (N-A), has the qualities of N (N~A), that uses N on something (N:A), that applies N to something (N;A)
N>V = to use N on (N:V), to apply N to (N;V), to make something related to M (N-V), to make something have the qualities of N (N~V)
A>N = something of quality A (A~N)
A>V to make something have quality A(A~V), go use something that has quality A on something (A:V), to apply something of quality A to something (A;V)
V>N = something that V applies to (V;N), the act of V (V^N)
V>A = that does V (V^A), that is for V (V:A), that is related to the act of doing V (V-A)
: use (utility transformation)
; apply (application transformation)
- relate (relational transformation)
~ quality (qualitative transformation)
^ reference (referential transformation)
I think you're right in identifying A^N and V^N (esp in modern usage)
so basically i define all words as a sentence
nouns and adjectives have an S somewhere, verbs have an S and O
a nounâs meaning is what S is, an adjective makes a statement where S is the subject or head, a verb makes a statement where S is the subject and O is the object
in these derivations, S and O refer to the new meaning being formed, S.X and O.X are that of the meaning being inputted, and X is the action/state/event of X happening
also A V N are just adjective verb noun
so oN(V) takes a V and makes it an N
yes
I worked out what each was via the supplimentary explanations you gave and lined them up with Lipamanka's transformations (plus a bit of new notation that I devised to keep track of them all)
I'm trying to create a bit more specificity to the mathematical model and link up bewteen currently divergent notation systems
pona a
so far I have identified 5 baseline transformations that can be applied to any N,V or A
maybe I should explain these a bit more gimme a sec
X = input (the original word with its original POS meaning), Y = output word (with a new POS based on the original word).
: use (utility transformation) = a transformation to Y based on the usage of X (sometimes on another object)
; apply (application transformation) = a transformation to Y based on the application of X potential of application of X (usually to another object)
- relate (relational transformation) = a transformation to Y based on Y being related to X, or signifying relation to X
~ quality (qualitative transformation) = a transformation to Y that is based on Y having qualities of X, or signifying having the qualities of X
^ reference (referential transformation) = a transformation to Y where Y references X directly, holding all meanings of X bar its original part of speech
Potential uses -
can replace the > in X>Y
can replace the initial lower case letter in aY(X) or aY
Aww man all this is beyond my comprehension 
TL;DR
in lipu pu all words are defined as either adjectives (A), verbs (V) or nouns (N), but the book also gives ways to take any word from one to another (transformations)
lets say that X is the original word and Y is the word after it has been changed to another form
lipamanka's notation is written X>Y.
i.e. A>V, A>N, V>N, V>A, N>V, N>A.
jan Seli's notation is written aY(X) and aY where a is any letter and shows different types of transformation
i.e. sN, qN, oN, uV, mV, vA, nA
and
sN(A), qN(A, V), oN(V), uV(N), mV(A), vA(V), nA(N)
my notation aims to bridge the two with the symbols (:;-~^) by replacing lipamanka's (>) and jSeli's (a). Soooooooo -
X:Y, X;Y, X-Y, X~Y and X^Y,
and
:Y(X), ;Y(X), -Y(X), ~Y(X) and ^Y(X) as well as :Y, ;Y, -Y, ~Y and ^Y
the symbols (:;-~^) represent different types of transformations
your tldr was longer
okay but it was aimed to be less jargon-y
more big jargon mode
N>A>N
jan (N) - ijo jan (-A) [jan li jo e ijo ni] ~ jan (~N) [ni li jan pi ni jo ijo] N-A~N
jan (N) ~ ijo jan (~A) [ijo ni li sama jan] ~ jan (~N) [ni li jan ni pi sama ijo] N~A~N
jan (N) : ijo jan (:A) [jan li kepeken ijo ni] ~ jan (~N) [ni li jan pi kepeken ijo] N:A~N
jan (N) ; ijo jan (;A) [ijo ni li jo e jan, jan li lon ijo] ~ jan (~N) [ni li jan pi lon ijo] N;A~N
nimi âjanâ la, N>A>N = N
N>V>N
jan (N) - ijo1 li jan e ijo2 (-V) [ijo1 li lon e ni: jan li jo e ijo2]
; jan (;N) [ni li ijo2)
^ jan (^N) [ni li nasin/pali pi kama jan pi jo ijo]
jan (N) ~ ijo1 li jan e ijo2 (~V) [ijo1 li lon e ni: ijo2 ni li sama jan]
; jan (;N) [ni li ijo2]
^ jan (^N) [ni li nasin/pali pi kama sama jan]
jan (N) : ijo1 li jan e ijo2 (:V) [ijo1 li lon e ni: ijo2 li kepeken jan] [*]
; jan (;N) [ni li ijo2]
^ jan (^N) [ni li nasin/pali pi kepeken jan]
jan (N) ; ijo1 li jan e ijo2 (;V) [ijo1 li lon e ni: jan li lon ijo2 / ijo2 li jo e jan]
; jan (;N) [ni li ijo2]
^ jan (^N) [ni li nasin/pali pi kama jo jan / ni li nasin/pali pi kama jan lon ijo]
[*ijo1 li lon e ni: jam li kepeken ijo2 (?)]
[li lon e = to make something exist in the way that it exists]
nimi âjanâ la, N>V>N =/= N
Proof that N>A>N = N and that N>V>N =/= N for jan kpk TPT
omg
WIP
pona a
N>A
N-A ijo1 (N) - ijo2 ijo1 (-A) [ijo1 li jo e ijo2 /ijo2 li lon ijo1/ ijo2 li lon kulupu ijo1]
N~A ijo1 (N) ~ ijo2 ijo1 (~A) [ijo2 li sama ijo1]
N:A ijo1 (N) : ijo2 ijo1 (:A) [ijo1 li kepeken ijo2 /ijo1 li kepeken ijo2]
N;A ijo1 (N) ; ijo2 ijo1 (;A) [ijo2 li jo e ijo1 / ijo1 li lon ijo2 / ijo1 li lon kulupu ijo2]
N>V
N-A ijo1 (N) - ijo2 li ijo1 e ijo3 (-V) [ijo2 li lon e ni: ijo1 li jo e ijo3 / ijo3 li lon kulupu ijo1]
N~A ijo1 (N) ~ ijo2 li ijo1 e ijo3 (~V) [ijo2 li lon e ni: ijo3 ni li sama ijo1]
N:A ijo1 (N) : ijo2 li ijo1 e ijo3 (:V) [ijo2 li lon e ni: ijo3 li kepeken ijo1/ijo2 li kepeken ijo3]
N;A ijo1 (N) ; ijo2 li ijo1 e ijo3 (;V) [ijo2 li lon e ni: ijo3 li jo e ijo1 / ijo3 li lon ijo1 / ijo3 li lon kulupu ijo1]
tokiponisation of the transformations N>V and N>A
the way that you translated kala directly as fish in english had me thinking too literally. I was like, "when is lipamanka gonna become a fish????"
I am calquing toki pona
bad ah
mi understand ala e things
Oh no, something beyond my comprehension in #1032830156676538378 again! For the second time!
BAD THING HAPPEN
ACCIDENTALLY CLOSED BROWSER WITH STILL-INCOMPLETE CONTAINMENT FORM
ALL GONE
google forms saves progress does it not?
uh i can try
use history
thank god
ijo (noun: thing, object, matter) = generic noun with minimal content
kule (adjective: colorful, painted) = generic adjective with minimal content
ante (verb: to change) = generic verb with minimal content
N>A
N-A ijo1 (N) - ijo2 ijo1 (-A) [ijo1 li jo e ijo2 /ijo2 li lon ijo1/ ijo2 li lon kulupu ijo1]
N~A ijo1 (N) ~ ijo2 ijo1 (~A) [ijo2 li sama ijo1 / kule ijo2 li ijo1]
N:A ijo1 (N) : ijo2 ijo1 (:A) [ijo1 li kepeken ijo2 /ijo1 li kepeken ijo2]
N;A ijo1 (N) ; ijo2 ijo1 (;A) [ijo2 li jo e ijo1 / ijo1 li lon ijo2 / ijo1 li lon kulupu ijo2]
N>V
N-V ijo1 (N) - ijo2 li ijo1 e ijo3 (-V) [ijo2 li lon e ni: ijo1 li jo e ijo3 / ijo3 li lon kulupu ijo1]
N~V ijo1 (N) ~ ijo2 li ijo1 e ijo3 (~V) [ijo2 li lon e ni: ijo3 ni li sama ijo1 / kule ijo3 li ijo1]
N:V ijo1 (N) : ijo2 li ijo1 e ijo3 (:V) [ijo2 li lon e ni: ijo3 li kepeken ijo1/ijo2 li kepeken ijo3]
N;V ijo1 (N) ; ijo2 li ijo1 e ijo3 (;V) [ijo2 li lon e ni: ijo3 li jo e ijo1 / ijo3 li lon ijo1 / ijo3 li lon kulupu ijo1]
li lon e = to make something exist in the way that it exists = to make (_) be true
A>N
A~N ijo kule (A) ~ kule (~N) [kule1 li sama kule lon ijo]
A>V
A~V ijo1 kule1 (A) ~ ijo2 li kule1 e ijo3 (~V) [ijo2 li lon e ni: ijo3 li sama kule1 / kule ijo3 li kule1]
A:V ijo1 kule1 (A) - ijo2 li kule1 e ijo3 (-V) [ijo3 li lon e ni: ijo2 li jo e kule1 / kule1 li lon ijo3 / kule1 li lon kulupu ijo3]
A;V ijo1 kule1 (A) ; ijo2 li kule1 e ijo3 (;V) [ijo2 li lon e ni: kule1 li jo e ijo3 / ijo3 li lon kule1 / ijo3 li lon kulupu kule1]
li lon e = to make something exist in the way that it exists = to make (_) be true
V>N
V;N ijo1 li ante1 e ijo2 (V) ; ante1 (;N) [ante1 li ante1 ijo2]
V^N ijo1 li ante1 e ijo2 (V) ^ ante1 (-N) [ante1 li nasin pali pi kama ante1 tan ijo1]
V>A
V-A ijo1 li ante1 e ijo2 (V) - ijo2 ante1 (-A) [ijo1 li jo e ijo2 / ijo2 li lon ijo1 / ijo2 li lon kulupu ijo1]
V:A ijo1 li ante1 e ijo2 (V) : ijo2 ante1 (:A) [ijo2 li kepeken ante1 / ante1 li kepeken ijo2]
V^A ijo1 li ante1 e ijo2 (V) ^ ijo1 ante1 (^A) [ijo1 li ante1 e ijo ante]
jesus
I converted each of the transformations into toki pona :))
(peer review would be appreciated but not demanded)
I now have some fanart
ni li lukin pona
lukin pona tu a
us
mu
oh no
new goal
stick speedrun
wow
okay time to get a new goal
okay new goal https://ko-fi.com/lipamanka/goal?g=0
OH MY GOD
do you lay your eggs yourself
scrunkly
which optoin will make it more likely for me to recieve money
yes
idc as long as they hatch into little baby lipamankas
they do
hell yeah
I can figure most of these calques out but WHAT IS FISH SEMISOLID
This has been eating away at me for like several hours
musi mute aaaaa
yea
The wise ones
Also I guessed that black fluid stick means ||pen|| because ||pen||s are sticks and ||ink|| is usually a black liquid. That was easy.
Still can't guess what "fish semisolid" is though
Knowledge house is def ||school|| and the wise ones are def ||teachers||
Bread pellets def ||cereal|| because ||cereal|| has wheat as an ingredient and animal juice is def ||milk||. The biggest giveaway was the "which do u put in first" question; before I read that question I thought that bread pellets were ||bread crumbs|| and animal juice was something animal-related and presumably icky, but then I read the "which do u put in first" question and it hit me
||shower soap|| is definitely semisolid but I still wonder wheee the fish comes from
organism submerged in water = kala
to many people including lipamanka i believe
So you mean that if I jump into a swimming pool
I can become a fish :O
No, you become a kala. But fish are kala tho :D
||Is taking a shower really submerging yourself ||đ¤
fair
||lipamanka likes to take baths so||
a ni li kala!
a a a
<@&1061183612709515354> hello friends are u excited for a new form so am I I am waiting for ideas to come into my brain so no poll rn sorry
mu
A new form of what
Wasnât mu vs. kalama an option floating around?
I couldn't think of a cool form
yeah it was gbut I didn't make the poll so
ÂŻ_(ă)_/ÂŻ
anyway this is just me saying : start a conversation about some cool toki pona thing you're interested in, and u might convince me to make it into a poll
like tomorrow
wait i'm so mentally burnt out i'm sorry are you planning on a poll for a form for an essay or an essay for a form for a book or a new form of essay or nothing or what
i think this could lead so some cool discussion
a google form poll for an essay that will ultimately go into a book (this is how i understand it, at least)
ijo li ken pona e pakala
If anything i feel like it's less permanent and innate
i mean ijo li ken pona e ike kin but
like. the vibes right? you get them
pakala feels temporary because you assume there is some state and often time in which it worked
maybe jaki as well
night night
(i.e. be in my bed on my phone)
pakala-s definitely don't have to be ike. i think the ike connotation is so prevalent just because there are so many scenarios where something being broken etc. is bad
i want to react
to just the first part
lol yeah
hmmmm im trying to think of some object that might be better pakala'd
maybe pakala musi, like it can be fun to build something then knock it over
i dont know what youre talking about
anyway have ppl decided on what they want the next poll to be about
IL LOVE YOU TOO
omg
is this like that thing that was just a banana taped to a wall
OOOH yeah i know about that stuff that's pretty cool
i was thinking about the kind of art that everybody laughs at because it looks like the artist put no effort into it but it's still selling for millions of dollars
which is alright from an art perspective but pretty cringe from a capitalism perspective
It's ok let the ideas take their time
an egg i want to eat
capitalism
Already done
for pakalas that are pona tbh the first thought that came to my mind was a piĂąata
(taso ni li pona ala tawa soweli poki)
i think pakala implies that something used to not be pakala without implying positive or negative. if itâs supposed to be whole, then itâs bad, and if itâs supposed to be pakala, then itâs good. most things are not made to be broken, so pakala is often bad
it's weird, i've just never thought of pakala as inherently being about Destruction
it's about breaking, but that doesn't mean it's like. a particular kind of breaking
cutting up an onion is pakala, breaking off a piece of clay with your hands is pakala, blowing smth up is pakala, cutting a piece of wood is pakala, &c&c
Smh that's what kipisi is for /j
sorry i don't use bad words
how to get this ping
#poki
i could see using pakala in context for taking something apart to examine it as well. mi pakala e ona, mi lukin e insa ona
trueee
this project is lapeing
good because i am lapeing on containment form
i think im just gonna turn it in without jo and lawa filled out
i did that
@floral crescent have fun
pona I'll read it when I'm less overwhelmed
i just realized it would be cool for book lipamanka to use linja lipamanka
it will lol
yay
wait why is this not called lipumanka
it is
the book of Minecraft đ
icecream sandwich â¤ď¸
the writer li LON
REAL
WOAH
i take credit for suggesting this >:)
okay u get credit for my identity
couples photo
I want to make one now Iâve never used VRchat- I have a rigged model of para but I donât really know if itâd work- I started to make one for my fursona but itâs only a face right now
Iâll take a look at them, but there are a lot more reasons why I donât wanna use the para model
ignore
okay this one is WRONG
wait
<@&1061183612709515354> I have made a cool new resource, I would like your feedback on it! this is draft number one.
oops double ping
needs color
anyway it's like, designed to be
- useful at a glance
- subtly teach nuance
- reflect common usage
- encourage exploration
lipamanka is essential vocab
I'm not gonna format it until I can test it in the VR chat thing with the lower res android thing what @raven ibex told me about
real actually
oh is it not readable in android mode?
oh I forgot to
[Reply to:](#1032830156676538378 message) real actually đ
unjoke that one
mu and kalama as synonyms is interesting but also i dont think there is like any point in getting into the differences between them bc of how vibe based it is on a chart like this
not like super bad (and certainly not as much as the banner it's replacing đ) but there could be some colors to spice it up and make it more playful in order to match the vibes of the classroom
also a black-and-white one can be used in the outdoor space and other contexts where it shouldn't be colorful
lukin mi la o wan e sitelen Lasina e sitelen pona pi nimi sama, o weka e nimi ante tan nimi ante.
I think what if this was like. okay so there are 117 words total here
mu = sound
kalama = three-syllable-long sound
monsi
how can I divvy this up into multiple posters
we could have seven 16x16 posters
no..
five 4x5 posters, one of which has three slots missing, those slots are filled by the lipamanka glyph as my signature
the second half as in the last four words?
/ambiguous
i dont think the unpa def with the f word is necessary @floral crescent
I included it on purpose
having "fuck" in more than one definition makes it more clear that those topics aren't vulgar
As i read further im realizing this is likely not meant as a Professional Source
And more of just gettin funky ?
this is meant to be a learning tool
Yeah but not like Ooh Im Formal
it being a little silly makes it better serve that purpose
Formal is the word yes
If youâre including buy for esun, i would also include sell
I decided against that mostly because I don't see it used like that
I added some plausable modes of exploring the semantic space (like "swap") because they seem very understandable within what I see used, but using esun for sell specifically isn't like . hm actually..
I'll have to like poll it at some point and maybe I'll make a v2
never mind esun's semantic space is shifting in my mind
esun form đđ
maybe
update: I did it
[Reply to:](#1032830156676538378 message) If youâre including buy for esun, i would also include sell
some other changes:
- ijo includes "something"
- kala includes "whale"
- kalama includes "static" and "hum" (not sure how I feel 'bout them honestly)
- kule now includes "pitch" "flavor pallet" and "texture"
- kulupu includes "society" and "plural system"
- laso now includes "blueish purpleish"
- len now includes "clothing"
more to come
also unpa now includes erotic right
i'm not a fan of kalama including static/hum
like those are sounds yes but why those specifically
i've never seen them talked about
- added "bagel hole" to lupa
- added "orangeish" to loje
- added "website" and "file" to lipu
- added "worm" and "(weasel?)" to linja (I'll prolly remove weasel ngl but I think it's kinda funny, if it stays it's staying in parentheses)
- added "slug" and "sponge" to ko
- REMOVED STATIC AND HUM FROM KALAMA lol
- added "wampum" to mani (?)
- added "feminine" and "masculine" to meli and mije
- added "(demonstrative)" to ni
might remove bagel hole
but it MEANS A LOT TO ME >:(
okay I'll keep going through it tomorrow I need to shower and go to bed rn
your post is the first instance of "wampum" on this server, and my post here is the second
wampum is really cool!
ni should have âthatâ too anu seme
I decided very specifically against it
people use it for thatttttt
because ni doesn't mean 'that'
it just doesn't have a proximity distinction!!!
so including "that" will make people think about it the wrong way!!!
but it not having a proximity distinction means it means âthisâ and âthatâ!!!!!
thats like saying âmi doesnt make a number distinction so i should only list âi, me, myââ!!!!!!
either people won't notice (good, it will instil good practices) or they ask about it and someone explains nuancedly about the proximity distinction !!!!!
unlike including we in "mi" because that will instil good practices!!!!
I am a master of design!!!
what good practice is impeded by including âthatâ!!
if large domesticated land animal is just as specific as wampum anyway and I want more people to look up stuff about indigenous cultures
go to sleep!!!! /I win the silly argument
[Reply to:](#1032830156676538378 message) what good practice is impeded by including âthatâ!!
the explanation i would have given before today: ÂŤit means "this" or "that", idk why they didn't include "that" on this diagramÂť

sleeping disorder update: my sleeping disorder has mutated
I now automatically wake up every day at 9:30
it's horrible
none!!! that's my point!!
[Reply to:](#1032830156676538378 message) what good practice is impeded by including âthatâ!!
seme!!!!!!
but youre saying it doesnt impede any good practices
oh I misread
honestly though thinking about ni as meaning "this" and "that" will make learners think in english for longer
even if it's SLIGHT
I am a DESIGNER
I am DESIGNING
only listing âthisâ will make learners think in english more bc theyll think theres a proximity distinction
like its possible they wont notice and think of âthisâ and âthatâ as similar enough to use the same word but like. why introduce that confusion!!!!
ni pi poka ala
exactly
you can specify proximity with ni poka and ni weka !!!!!
but you don't have to !!!!!
that's how "this" works in engish too!!!! it can be unspecified proximity!!!!
not really!
i wouldnt point at something far away and say âthisâ i think!
points at something far away
this
listener interprets that there's something conceptually near about this far-away thing
points at something far away
ni
listener interprets that there's something conceptually near about this far-away thing...?
stop it!!!!!!

okay how about this
if you give me five dollars on ko-fi
I will
add "that"
/manipulation /coersion
i mean that i feel like that's how i would interpret someone doing that
probably not consciously
đŤĄ
maybe it's because nobody uses the "that" proximity distiction in portuguese
like "this building" (points far away) to represent a building that you're traveling to tomorrow
okay how about
I add "that"
and I also add "yonder"
how do we feel
is this GOOD
i'm not arguing for adding "that" btw, i'm exploring this
I kno wi"m stillyelling at JAN SELI!!!!!!
/betrayed /angry /multiplle personality disorder /dangerous
exactly đ
[Reply to:](#1032830156676538378 message) âyonderâ is not nearly as common as âthisâ and âthatâ



yonder is cute hmm
do you have a boyfriend who made you a cool avatar in VR chat? I don't think so
I win
:)
đ
LOOK AT IT
what if i have a girlfriend who made me a cool avatar in manyland? checkmate
i did tho

i think yonder is a good idea actually
mine is a cat so yes itâs better
incorrect
[Reply to:](#1032830156676538378 message) mine is a cat so yes itâs better
i like these two
this
this, that, yonder
better than i like this one
this, that
wrong
why is there a semicolon

true
[Reply to:](#1032830156676538378 message) i like these two
this
this, that, yonder
better than i like this one
this, that

[Reply to:](#1032830156676538378 message) why is there a semicolon
âŚ
because
it makes "that" and "yonder" secondary meanings :3



anyway here's a fucking POSTER I made that's gonna be on VR CHAT or someth
with a giant WATERMARK!!!
is that watermark 9x as big as everything else
or what's 2.5 squared
it feels like 2.5 as tall
it's significat
add indeed to kin i want people to use that more
o pana e nimi collection anu?
pakala la mi toki ala e ni: pali sina li pona :)
ijo: action
I mean, I guess
alasa: try
Hmmm... The way you talked about "ni" not using "that" as an example at one point (I know this changed), "try" doesn't quite fit into that, I feel? It's definitely very related, but "mi alasa e kili" and "I'm trying out apples" are probably the furthest apart way to separate these - but this example probably isn't actually fair, I just have yet to formulate my thoughts around this and it could take another year or so
ike: bad, worsen, negative quality
pona: good, positive quality
I think this list put these 2 together in a more antonymic way than I've seen in most lists - not a criticism, just interesting to see
jelo: orangeish
(this is me lying, it doesn't say that)
jo: own
also interesting to see this!
kala: submarine
hm
not wrong
I doubt I'd ever do this
kalama: see mu
SLANDER! (you changed it)
kama: become
Oh!
Wait
Is this preverb usage, or would this also be non-preverb usage?
lukin: try
Oh so this does include preverb usage
Hm, I see the semicolon on alasa now
But no semicolon on kama?
And on sona? Hm, unless "know how" and "know-how" are the same, anglophones will have to tell me
mama: familial
Hmm
that is true, but seems misleading? Like, a general familial thing, yes, but not any, such as a parent's offspring being familial, right? Although technically, mama also works for that
nimi: sentence
hm, I think I should place anotherI guess :despair:here?
pipi: non-cute animal
(I have fabricated another lie)
poka: contextual
I'm not sure I understand what this is for?
poki: label
I know what this is for, and it might be confusing
wan: married
I guess :despair:
waso: airplane
same as kala
weka: ignored
Oh, that's pu, isn't it? I'm... not sure how that is meant, tbh
kili: spice, herb, extra, garnish, additional, ornamental, the cherry on top
(lie)
kin: also, in addition
aw
monsuta: spooky, scary, monster
one-sided monsuta, interesting!
i think the "ignored" meaning is so that "mi weka e ijo" can mean "i ignore something"
interesting
I haven't seen that
but I haven't been looking either
i think id usually specify like "mi weka e ni lon lawa mi/tan pilin mi" but i think it works
oh definitely
but I'd need stronger context if the prepositional phrase were left out, I think, so that one stands out
makes sense
"ignore" for "weka" is pu
it says that
do you mean that "ignored" is there or that an example with "ignore" is there
i dont know of any examples either
im just wondering since you said "ignore" not "ignored"
tho isnt your resource supposed to be descriptive
it doesnt matter if its in pu
ohhhh
pu li suli la o toki e 'few' lon nimi 'lili' 

i kinda assumed it wouldnt be since you were saying its not really used like that anymore
and yeah it's supposed to be a teaching resource but it's also designed to encourage experimentation
I got good dw
I realized my nasin can shift it just takes like. a day
<@&1061183612709515354>
draft 2
eagle misspelled as "eagel" in waso definition
of course I did
how fo yall feel about âpilin monsutaâ to say scared/afraid
Unrelated to ur thing it just reminded me of it
hum in kalama as humm idk if thats on purpose or not
intentional
a humm is less of a human sound
đ
oh yeah mine says that too
seli li pini la, ona sina li mu tu wan anu tu tu anu luka anu?
did you exclude the jaki meaning of like jaki Kolona?
disease
nasa la sitelen Lasina pi nimi "pu" li sewi
sitelen "noka" en "pilin" en "seli" li lon poki nasa li weka nasa
sina pona
sina pona :)
n sitelen pona "pilin" li awen lon poka tu... mi lukin pi tenpo lili la pakala li ken lon sona mi
a ala
mi pana e lipu
mi pona e pilin <---------------
sina toki e ni: pilin li pakala |
mi toki e ni: mi pona e pilin ----
pilin li pakala
đ /musi
nimi "pan" en nimi "suno" la sitelen lili , li lon pini toki
waso :)
mi pilin linjamanka
petition to get one or more of ["smurf", "jawn"] added to the ijo def
whatâs a jawn
i mean iâll do it tbh
essay idea: is an argument an utala? what are we throwing away with a lack of nuance here?
there's a threshold where a toki utala becomes an utala toki, maybe?
i think arguments are inherently war-like in english speaking culture (and probably a lot of other western cultures) just because of how ingrained that metaphor is in our idioms (i read about this on stream a few days ago)
toki pona should help us not argue
argument is a western concept imo, cultures can conduct discourse in other ways and i think argument is not very fun to participate in
a type of communication where the two parties have opposing ideas and are trying to convince each other that they are right, usually
thats an utala
toki pona should discourage this
or it should make more clear how that type of discourse is similar to war and therefore bad
ken la jan toki li utala ala. taso sona en pilin ona li utala.. anu seme
ken la toki o utala ala o wan
sona o kama wan
jan ante li sona mute la o kute
sina en jan ante li sona sama la o alasa e sona pona
lipu lipamanka
@floral crescent you should include ânumber ofâ in mute
a common mistake i see is using nanpa for quantity, since ânumberâ is used this way in english
I've started to work on one of these that explains particles
still workshopping this diea
I'm thinking about adding a specific label here
where are these definitions (gonna be) published?
i know what this is trying to say but it feels like it's saying there's a type of physical container nicknamed a lesbian
doesn't help that recently i read about a type called gaylord
i,,, don't get it's trying to say
is it saying that lesbian is an umbrella term?
Wow! Our nasins differ a bit! Interesting! /genuine
(labels feel more nimi to me, groupings feel more kulupu to me, though I wouldn't mind using poki to refer to labels and groupings as well; I'll consider it. Also, I'm not saying the definitions are bad by any means, I've just never thought of using poki that way before, and so have never used it like that before)
Funny how the thought of using "poki kon" to mean "balloon" crossed my mind long before the thought of using "poki" to mean label or grouping
mi la, nimi poki is a very good way to say label
and imma probably be using it in the future if i remember
i dont know if i'd use just poki for label
I see the reasoning, but to me a label is primarily a nimi
I think it depends on how label is used
like 'grouping' or 'pidgeon holing,' = poki
the physical label - lipu
the words on a label or label meaning word - nimi
alao grouping, =/= group together alwaya
grouping as in 'grouping together' 'huddling' etc - kulupu
grouping as in unifying - wan
grouping as in separating into their own distinct groups such that each is in a specific place or box (literal or abstract) - poki
poki isnused like this in #poki and #poki-toki
yea that's true
i meant label in the way that "gamer" or "bisexual" is a label
a word that categorises a concept into a poki
True
mute should be used as a noun more
Makes sense to me
I don't like this
sorry sean
well I'm th3e kulupu poki so I win
i strongly agree with this
<@&1061183612709515354> here's the penultimate draft, please look it over and give any final feedback! the next version will be final, it will include a licence (probably CC? not sure which one, I still gotta look into that) and the DRAFT watermark will get removed
isn't it Wazowski with an A
cold
thanks lol
having only they and it for ona scares me because I feel like people using this would start saying ona mije and ona meli for he and she
^^^^^^^
what if I did they, it, any third person pronoun; ex: he, she
this could be solved without including the gendered pronouns by adding "third person pronoun" as another definition
i just realized the glyph for olin is funky
I tried to fix it, nothign worked, whatever
top heart has a point on the inside and the bottom heart is rounded there
mi lukin e nimi pakala "essencial"
nimi Li en E en sama li lon ala tan seme?
oh did I forget sama
ala a a a
do you wanna try to explain the grammar of toki pona in three short lines with maybe nine words maximum each
without being like confusing
oooo nice :D
nn alasa suli a a a
I am making a different chart for particles
alright I'll add it back in, I agree
if you're capitalizing the jan examples you should probably also capitalize the musi examples
Great idea
oh and Communism and Taoism
why does communism need to be capitalized
I don't personally get taoism but idk much about that so I'll do it
Is this designed to fit nicely onto some specific size of paper
uhhh not particularly
it's meant to be an image shared online
I'm going to make versions of it that are paper sized though
it shouldn't idk why I thought that lol
awww that's so cute of you...
sama la ilo mi li mu
does anyone here have a printer they can use to test how printable a printer sheet sized version of this is
awen: preverb (or the semicolon) missing
jan: maybe a line break or two?
kama, sona, ken: missing preverb semicolon?
lipu: no flatness? that's fine, just want to be sure
namako:
(it's the wrong glyph) sigh nothing /overly dramatic
it's a bit cut off at the bottom
probably just my printer being weird
I see
no, not just your printer
thank you for testing this out btw
is this a standard size piece of paper?
yeah
i think more space around the edges would be good
i donât think most printers have margins that small
okay
OH it's A4 sized
not US letter
whoopsies
YEP
I changed it and wow
okay
gimmie a minute
:3
@simple magnet
(for everyone else to see)
wait actually I might make everythign a bit bigger
because there's a setting when you print things to add a margin
OKAY! It's printable!
great
thank you!
everything's readable right?
yeah
wooo!
I've decided to licence it under CC BY-SA 4.0
okay official release time
whoo
super yay
woooooo
Maybe utala is any discourse between two or more people? Whether it be conversation or something else. Maybe it should require competitiveness. Maybe unpa can be utala too since they're both competing to offer the other the best one.
utala is not any discourse between two people
that's what I'm avoiding
seeing unpa as inherently utala is . kind of dangerous
like it can be for some people but it's not only possible but super healthy to have sex that isn't utala
unpa being inherently utala is a really shitty take tbh
if a discourse is an utala it will be a type of battle
that core of utala will always be true
an utala doesnt have to be inherently negative /this is not at the unpa take before people ask lol
like an utala can be mutually beneficial /this is why i put that disclaimer
idk my take on this other than i have had some really fun arguments before
yeah I have had some really fun battles
(genuinely)
(like, with foam weapons)
sports are usually fun
yeah true
I often enjoy taking standardized tests to a degree
utala can mean "challenging" but not really in a bad way
its more like i dont really like the idea that utala-y discourse is inherently a bad way of doing discourse
Hmm no idea if this is a fair assessment but:
toki utala isnât an argument more often than it is. It can strategizing, venting, discussion of competitions, or just angering words. utala toki is something else I canât quite think of what to say (which I guess could be described using utala toki because its a struggle of talking)
I wouldn't describe venting as toki utala
but I would describe the others as types of battles
or discussion related to battle
Itâs struggle talk ig but thereâs a better way of saying it probably
most of my vents are not utala-y or related to utala
unless they're like, venting about an utala or something
if that makes sense
I think of utala as just like a general struggle or difficulty? I donât know if itâs a fair way to think of it. It might be a lexicaliztation tho
lexicalization? no it's already a word in the lexicon
I have no idea what Iâm saying sometimes 
I should have said I donât know if Iâm stretching the definition
I MEANT CALQUE
I meant calque
I didnât know the difference but now I do
idk either
Now that I think about it, utala toki meaning struggling with words is a bit of a calque
I don't think so
Iâm just thinking that using utala with other words doesnât work as well⌠like utala lape⌠but actually this might be ok tbh
Cus like utala lape could mean like restfully battling?
utala lape is great for like struggling to fall asleep
Yeah thatâs what I was thinking but I doubted it at first
The most clear way to say argument would probably be utala kepeken toki
and for struggling to get up in the morning 
dialectics: sona utala
(both lexicalized and not lexicalized, in proper dialectic fashion)/j
in my experience, learning is best described not by kama sona, but by utala sona. The knowledge struggle. One can collect facts, or come to wisdom, but to truly internalize it is to investigate it, test it, allow it to offer resistance to you until it is no longer acting against you, but towards your purpose. life is a series of struggles, both good and bad. This is not to say that we should glorify conflict, but perhaps within utala we may find meaning in struggle in ways that the english connotations of battle, wrestle, conflict, and the like prevent us from.
I'd say alasa for this
mi toki pona la, en 'learning' en 'research' li pilin sama li pilin pi nimi 'alasa'
utala sona li pilin ante
a
mi kama/alasa sona la, mi wile ala utala. tomo sona li utala sona e mi la, mi ken ala utala wawa la, ona li nanpa lili e sona mi.
ni li ike tawa mi.
ante la, ona li toki
toki sona
en jan sona en jan pi sona lili li toki sona la, jan pi sona lili li kama jan sona.
sina sona ala sona e pilin mi? sina pilin sama ala sama?
sona. taso mi pilin ni: nasin mi pi nimi utala en nasin sina li ante lili. mi pali la mi pana sona nanpa. jan mute mi pi kama sona li wile ala utala. taso ona li utala ala la ona li ... ona li sona ala e sona. ona li alasa e nasin sona pi utala ala la ona li utala e nasin. ni la ona li utala ike tan ni: ona li wile ala utala pona. mi sona e nasin pilin sina. mi en sina li ken sama. mi pilin ni: toki mi sina li ante taso pilin li sama lili.
pilin mi li utala e nasin toki pi toki pona. mi alasa e nasin toki pona tawa pilin mi a a a
in V2 of my thing I'm gonna organize words based on putting things semantically related next to each other and drawing boxes around them
YES I LOVE DOING THAT
every time i try to do that it's easy for like a third of them and then impossibly hard for the rest
o wawa
thanks for the well wishes
hey everyone I'm making a toki pona course
it's going for the "I am autistic and I can't look away" learning style
<@&1061183612709515354>
bottom left, opportunity is misspelled
Super cool
u forgot to change the text for the moku ala moku away from anu seme
mu is labeled as moku
kili is labeled as pipi and used in the sentence as pipi
there is a soweli marked as an akesi
also alasa and kili
lol
if anything is on the left side I haven't actually fixed anythign there yet lmao
Use this version to learn toki pona if you want to learn toki pona in HARD MODE where you start out with wrong information and you have to break bad habits for the rest of your life
on the right side
SDJFJKSLDKFJ
thank u
ni li moku mute
divine is misspelled on the right side
thanks!
-remind 24h look at the thing
Set a reminder in 1 day from now (<t:1676748273:f>)
View reminders with the Reminders command
what thing đ
ohhhhhhhh
hmmm I'm trying to think of a way to explain how modification works in a way that sets up a good foundation for teaching pi
but I feel like I'm being too verbose and I don't have enough examples
and it's also not very clear
wait I had an idea
okay I like this a lot
I might change the toki pona example because it could be misleading - good is an adjective on its own
okay here we go!
i would try to make it visually clearer that "mi li wawa" is incorrect, for people who skim or forget
like fade it out or something
a teaching principle
people remember what they're told, and they don't always remember whether it's described as false
if you introduce people to misinformation and describe it as misinformation, some people will remember it as true
so some people will inevitably learn "mi li" from a diagram like this
but you can minimize that by labeling it very redundantly and obviously as false
I did that already :3
i like these colors
improved it more
I always wonder why you donât need a li in front of mi or sinaâŚ
Same for x ala x but I like to think that itâs x ala anu x, but the anu is dropped for flow, and because itâs not needed. Itâs probably the same for mi and sina li.
But this makes me wonder, why not drop it in other cases? If mi and sina can still be modified, then it should stand to reason that li would only be necessary when the subject has a modifier.
I donât like this tbh, nor do I like mi li, I just wonder if thereâs a reason more than flow and aesthetic to dropping li.
Reminder for @visual oracle
look at the thing
Ooh I like the arrows
arrows will be used consistently in examples to show modification visually
Theyâre pretty arrows
the mi wawa one doesn't make sense
if wawa is modifying mi then it's just a noun phrase not a sentence

you can think of the li as 3rd person marker. thus you always need it but with mi and sina
analogy: 3rd person sg. marker -s in english
and modified mi and sina are considered 3rd person as well, which isn't as weird as it might seem
Interesting⌠I guess it makes sense
I think that itâs also because thereâs usually only one mi and one sina in a conversation, but an infinite amount of 3rd persons. If that makes sense
yea, and also alot of sentences start with mi or sina, so it being shortened is natural
Yeah. Like x ala x is just x ala anu x, because why would you say not eating eatishly. And itâs a common way to write yes or no questions
this is actually a common question format, theres a wiki page about it https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A-not-A_question
In linguistics, an A-not-A question, also known as an A-neg-A question, is a polar question that offers two opposite possibilities for the answer. Predominantly researched in Sinitic languages, the A-not-A question offers a choice between an affirmative predicate and its negative counterpart. They are functionally regarded as a type of "yes/no" ...
(me when i dont reed the whole reply, my saying it was common is redundant)
Oh I didnât know it was an actual thing 
Like I was saying that x ala anu x would be quite common so you can just drop the anu
because why would you say not eating eatishly
but that's not what it's saying, its just how we mark yes/no questions, the ala here is acting grammatically
maybe we want to move this to #learn-toki-pona-1?
Mm no? I understand how x ala x works and why people use it I just was unsure how it came about 
wdym no
I mean the conversation doesnât need to continue like I got all the information I need
ahh i see
Suggestion: "can mean" -> can describe
announcement; iâm trying it/its
Woah I am too and sometimes I forget 
new domain WORKS http://lipamanka.gay/
Woo!
currently checking with one of my blind friends to make sure https://lipamanka.gay/resources/dictionary is screen reader accessible (it was out of order and I got some good tips, I recommend other people like actually talk to people who rely on screen readers when trying to make things accessible lol it's like the bare minimum)
I am also paying faer
if you have any SVGs with text on your sites ping me and i can help you make them accessible to screen readers! I know how to do that now!
(it's kinda tedious though and my site is completely backwards at the moment, therefore not accessible. but I'll fix that another day. there are a lot of different objects in this svg that are text that need to be in order, which isn't true for a lot of other svgs)
FUCK I DIDNT PUT THINK UNDER TOKI IN MY RESOURCE
AAAAAA
I ALRWADY LAMINATED LIKE 40 COPIES OF IT
but the button is still broken đ
true
good button. 11/10, would click again
sina isipin ala e ni lon tenpo pini 
you should put think under toki pilin sona alasa and utala
and thinking under mu
(this is a half joke. i do mu while i'm thinking, but i don't think it makes sense to put thinking in the definition of mu.)
i want to avoid connecting anything besides fighting with utala
just because of inherent metaphor built into the way we talk about things
i think solving a challenge is a type of struggle/fight
hm idk if im explaining it well
but there are cases where utala works for thinking about something
anyway not including it in utala is fine
yeah i think utala can refer to metaphorical challenges as well
er, struggle is a better word
yeah sure
but english has a lot of idioms about methods of communication being framed as fighting and that influences the way we communicate
and i donât want that to bleed over to toki pona
this is really true
where did trnassexxual gođ˘
here
incredible
I'm planning on six of these
and then I'll figure out how I can get them printed on a very long piece of paper that I can get laminated
okay it's coming together
I have a large enough chunk for transitive verbs
this is gonna be such a wonderful resource omgomg
update
ewewew why that shape
I made it kala now are u happy
oh thats fun
đ
here's how it's going rn
I added a small particle rundown so that people can reference the particles
in the final resource this is not going to be opposite of the toki pona vocabulary v1 sheet because
uh
oh right
so people can reference both without flipping back and forth
mhm
OKAY NO
W
NOW
not no
now
join
vc
now
@leaden cradle
now
@leaden cradle NO NOT THAT VC
thanks to @leaden cradle for the advice
đ
okay update
im going to use a time machine to learn toki pona using this resources instead of however i did it first
SO REAL
maybe the real linja was the friends we made along the way
SO true
(the sonja lang wedding thing is a joke)
colors
ew im in the orange section
okay iâll remove you đ
from the infographic đ
sipije should be on the infographic somewhere
đ¤Ź
mayhaps
Especially if this is the strategy 
trueâŚ
I guess mentioning the content word interpretation of the prep words too?
But thats a good explanation
those usages are in the vocab sheet
plus if I want to teach nuance like that the best way to do it is with the other part of the course, which is mostly puzzle solving and developing patters by translating
still working on it
@floral crescent only note is that having a "common misconceptions" bit is bad educational style
they haven't even made the misconceptions yet :P
try to identify the thing causing the misconception and change or avoid that, instead of naming the misconception
weirdly enough, telling somebody not to do something will make them learn to do that thing
educational psychology is wack, a a

wait i cannot read the sheet. are tose Language misconceptions or like, Meta misconceptions
very incomplete but this is what I have so far
the misconseptions are "toki pona isn't a real language" "you can't communicate complex concepts" stuff like that
so meta I guess?
I'm not gonna have stuff like "LON DOESN'T MEAN YES!" on here
I'm just gonna teach questions without mentioning that lon means yes

for
