#Jersey Numbers
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
I call dibs on #3 at LB
I agree
@spiral junco We keep the old rules for broadcast reasons. We only get the one camera angle and the concise numbering helps the broadcasters identify players better.
Bummer.
Fair enough
It’s the SS on the line of scrimmage that trip me up. There are some big safeties in this league, they look like linebackers.
I agree
@ashen palm do a vote with all broadcasts we got really good ones I don't think they would have a problem at all with numbers
Im interested in @upbeat ingot 's opinion
I think this is an owners vote thing anyways
@glad isle should be a broadcaster / live stats person vote it would effect them the most
Well, it isn't, so.
Each franchise has the right to propose new rules to be added to the rule book or changes to existing rules.
These rules and changes will be voted on by the entire SFL ownership group
you read bigly
I'm not against the idea - but I do like inferring what ones role is based on their jersey number. Just kinda aligns to what I see on nfl sundays.
@pseudo bluff u do realize nfl let's players wear any number right?
What about
@remote anchor opinionnon the topic
I do - but I think requires special permission... and is somewhat limited. XFL had a free-for-all tho I think
huh - looks like its more flexable then I thought, but still appears to be constrained somewhat (e.g. DBs can choose from 1 to 49)
https://www.nfl.com/news/nfl-passes-rule-expanding-eligible-jersey-numbers
Yeah and I think linebackers are 1-59
Mike's an owner as well. He gets a vote.
So does Andy as well I guess
It's been a busy day
Tldr it's up to owners
I truly hate that if it even goes to vote that the owners will have it just because not all owners do broadcast and or stats so vote should go to the people it would effect the most the broadcasters/stats people
I suppose the NFL faltered by not asking broadcasters and players as well then?
Let's say hypothetically owners vote yes for it and the broadcasters absolutely hate it because it's hard for them to identify players that would suck and our broadcasting would suffer from it
This isn't a democracy. Owners in conjunction with guidance from league staff make the rules of the league. Nobody has even proposed this as a change.
The SFL is a vanguard state
The owners pay quite a bit of money to own a team... They should have voting rights in my opinion.
💯
We do.
I think the broadcasters would adapt just fine. I would have no issue seeing the number rule changed.
I’d love to rock a single digit honestly.
7 on a LB would be dope.
7 on a corner would be tough too
Literally any single digit on any position would be hard. I personally think our number rules should align with the NFL. I don't think it would be a tough obstacle to overcome.
@spiral junco we are severely out numbered its pretty much a lost cause
Nah I wouldn't say lost cause. We just need a franchise to propose the number rule be changed and hope the owners hear their players out on what we would like to see.
There's nothing wrong with having a discussion about it.
you're talking about two positions that can both legally wear #40-49s right now?
Yes. Mostly their size and length makes a 3-3 look like a 3-4 or a Dime look like 4-2 or 4-2 a 4-3. Big safeties in this league.
I got 99 reasons......so im good either way....
That’s the number I’m hoping to rock, 99.
42 for me will always be a number wearing because of Jackie Robinson. and it was my number in bowling🎳
I've got my dad's number and my high school number, so I can't complain.
I got a hitchhikers reference for my number
Like I don't think a lot of player would switch from their current numbers if universal numbers were adopted, but I know a couple that would
If the owners cared about the broadcasters, they would stop it with the ridiculous dark-numbers-on-dark-jersey uniforms. Just because your numerals are trimmed in yellow doesn’t mean anyone not in the game can read them!
I am an Owner and I dont care about broadcasters
6
And I'm a Broadcaster and that offends me Mr. Hamilton
Well you sir are a right twit
Gasp
I cant believe we dont see eye to eye
I think we have more in common than you could ever imagine
I doubt that
there is one thing we absolutely can agree on though
Oh?
That Cade Stephens was in bounds
AH
Dont you agree?
Of course. Cade Stephens was easily and absolutely in bounds
Oh no. Andy vs Andy has begun
Which one is the clone?
Probably Andy
Dueling Andys. The new one man show that's taking stages across country by storm!!!
Cue the banjo music
LETS FUCKING GOOOOOOO
YES PLEASE
Andy Scamilton
Andy arguing with himself is the most SFL thing I've seen this season and I love it... more more MORE! 😃
I think current NFL ruling would be good. WRs with #1? Sure. QB with #69? Well, that is the exception, sure. #73 on a QB? Nah
Yeah current rules don't expand 69 avaliablity 😔
Also man the NFL putting H-Backs on their position list sure shows how much that stuff has changed
Poor fullbacks
ray have you read the rules on it?
*I saw that bc your last 2 examples arent allowed
- This isn't Ray, this is Ramos
- He's saying the rules are good and knows those last 2 aren't allowed
!doyle
Yea so what i mean is that I would be totally fine if the league moved to the current NFL ruling set
OH MY LAWD
I just woke up
Pardon me for confusing you two
I'm totally fine with a LB wearing #8 or a TE wearing #17. Allowing "any number" is kind of weird though. What if a WR chooses #65? That would be weird as hell
The NFL system is dope
HOWEVER I'd be open to allowing the number 0 as well
Its in the game people!
also, I'm sure @sour dagger you know from people commentating on MXC games that numbers in the current situation doesn't stop people from saying "there's 4 wide receivers on the field" or whatever(your fault for having those ace formations on the field), just saying 😏
Right
If you are for number change go vote on siwyc server we are losing 8 to 6
@sour dagger as a broadcaster how do u think u would adjust that's the only push back because the DC said it would make it hard on yall
I don't think it would as long as the numbers made sense. It has not affected NFL broadcasters either
You get familiar with players as a broadcaster, too
@sour dagger yea I thought the biggest adjustment would be just getting used to players new numbers if they change
But I wouldn't advocate for changing numbers mid season tho it would have to be in offseason
If that’s the case will 00 be allowed as well?
neither 0 or 00 will ever be allowed as it would break the immersion and stuff, don't enable Doyle
!doyle
Is 00 in the game?
yes
Fuck it, sure! @glad isle @modern scaffold
Be cultured @junior mason
I totally think 77 on a HB would go so hard! 🤣 I now need this in my life!
Only number I'd want to change to would be 57, and under current NFL rules that's not ever allowed 😕 However, in all honesty I'd be fine with them staying as-is
!andy
Adopting the NFL rules would be my desire as well
Let's crusade 😈
I strongly dislike the current NFL rules regarding jersey numbers...
A man of the people.
Time to propose this next owners meetings for the funsies of it
All players must wear 69 on their jersey
This is exactly how I will phrase it
I will be exempt from the rule because I am based
owned by facts and logic
Actually side note, is 00 or 0 in APF? I'd be open to letting those numbers be worn too
both are in
Okay, I'd say add 0 onto the positions that can take 1-49 and 00 to anyone who can go up to 99
Or looking at it I may limit 0 to offense and 00 to defense since LBs can take both 0 and 00
Should offensive linemen be able to wear 00 since Jim Otto was a center?