#🎯︱other-games
1 messages · Page 117 of 1
understandable take
I mean even sonic is open world now lmao
I love open world games but I lose interest exploring quick unless coop
i heard frontiers was good
if every open world game was a RDR2 it would be the best genre out there
That's how I feel. But elden rings co-op wasn't good enough to make it as fun as it could've been.
Me and my friend wanted to co-op it but we had to do each section twice, (one time for me, then one time for him)
And the fact you can't summon torrent.
So I just got burnt out with it
Really quickly
Why Fromsoft can't just make a lobby system, Idk.
yeah soulsborne coop is wack
each section twice ? lmao L bozo co op
The whole summoning each time is just plain annoying
wish more games had coop like dl2
sons of the forest is gonna be fun so I'm having hopes for that
you'd think the community would use their bandwagoning herd voice to make these ideas reach fromsoft instead of asking for bloodborne on PC
Yes, Because if he helped me kill my Margit, We'd have to fight through limgrave again to go kill his Margit so we could both do storm veil, exploring had to be done twice because weapons are host only pickup

It's just plain stupid
Honestly.
But nope. Blood borne PC is all anyone cares about
bloodborne PC top priority
bloodborne >
cock would agree
mfs in 2028 when they see the bloodborne ps6 remake video posted on sony's youtube channel :
altho realistically its happening in 2024

I wish bloodborne wasn't a PS exclusive I will say
I don't wanna go to my PS4 and play it in 30fps bruh
Let me play it in 60 on my series X 😭
ok but like
moving on to actual new games
we need a max payne 4
whats fucked up is i know we're still like atleast 5 years away from a RDR3
Max payne was good but Idk, A new one probably wouldn't be the same
3 was one of those games everyone shit on but i genuinely didn't get
i loved it
the narrative still had that classic dark vibe to it, just directed differently
it was a great attempt at a modern take (as long as you remove the favelas section)
Dead Space 3 be like
youtube review takes
I personally enjoyed DS3 in co-op
Speaking of which
we still doing that?
Or do you hate me now
i actually have it half way downloaded but i switched over to yakuza 6's download, don't feel like playing it so soon after finishing callisto
also 
btw i out of curiosity looked at skill up's track record for reviews
i swear he's the general public take's review channel
i specifically picked lost judgement because reviewers were shitting on one aspect of it and he also fell for the bait
I can't say I've watched skill up.
his thought process in many of his reviews is like "ok so how do i make it look like i agree with the general take, let me just say whatever"
Is that a yes?
i dont get how people use this clown as their main play or not source 
that's a why do you have that idea weird peepo stare
Because a lot people usually do lmao
another obvious one is far cry where he unironically said fc6 is the same old far cry we've been playing since 3
I honestly use my own opinions to decide..
I watch non commentary gameplay
And think whether I like it or not
If I do I get it, If I'm left unimpressed I don't
i get the context he's saying it in in the sense that the engine, the animations the shooting is still the same but to throw that comparison given how massively the formula has changed (for the worse) after primal just proves the guy has no history playing these games
i feel like people have forgotten that these reviewers are still just giving their takes
(which can and most of the times are L takes)
Not really
He's just got his opinions
That's actually why I respect his reviews
He doesn't just fold to what everyone else is saying
He liked DL2, he disliked DOOM Eternal, he gave a very valid take on last of us part 1
He did not recommend deathloop
A game that got perfect 10s across the board (for some reason)
He recommended halo infinite
@upbeat whale got 🎁 Present!
He did not recommend 12 minutes
He recommended outriders
I mean shit
I just did a quick scroll
He recommended riders Republic
He just gives his opinion straight
he also didn't recommend lost judgment as well as gave the same take everyone was giving for FC6, i've watched those reviews and it felt like hearing a politician speak, he knows what to say to give you the impression he's not trying to stay within the lines of what everyone's saying but he does it in a way where he'll convince you to accept what he's saying by the end of the video
I don't see why you have such a personal vendetta with him
riders republic was good tho
It's just steep with bikes and an awful monetization system and oh yeah the story 🤮
Fc6 sucks and lost judgement is good and basically everyone agrees that it's good
i don't have a vendetta with him i just found that throughout his reviews he'll say objectively wrong shit and give a general overview of some games that takes away from what they actually are
That's his opinion dude
If you don't like his opinion don't watch his videos
It's that simple
It's not objectively wrong
i'm not talking about the parts where he expresses his opinion, i'm talking about the parts where he'll speak about the history of a certain franchise, or describe gameplay / plot elements in the game that have nothing to do with your opinion
He prefaces every vid with "it's my opinion" hell his titles use subjective vernacular (I recommend, I do not recommend) rather than "x game is good or x game is bad" like moistcritikal or mudahar or angry Joe or most yt reviewers
you're literally missing the point here, how can you trust a reviewer who can't say it like it is when it comes to basic shit about a game, he can have his own opinion and that's fine, it's just that more often than not he has those tga moments where you're like "what ?"
Like why don't you have a problem with critical giving Callisto like 60% and shitting on it
Just when skillups calls it bad
can you be less of a 14 year old ?
like man thinks i'm trying to start a witch hunt against skillups
Like me for example, I'm a huge doom fan. I'm my opinion he said some dumbass shit in his eternal review like how 2016 was better because you had more ammo, and it was more fun without all the movement abilities and stuff and how that doesn't align with the doom franchise but at the end of the day that's just his opinion
Why should I let myself get worked up because he didn't like a game that I do
like i don't have a problem with the guy i'm just pointing out the flaws in his reviews, you need to stop being a baby about it, as far as critical if you want my honest take on him i have more respect for literally any other reviewer than him specifically
once again literally missing the point i'm trying to make
read this message again
Disagree ≠ objectively wrong
You act like a cyberbully "victim" when the solution is to just turn the computer off
In this case don't watch his reviews
It's not that hard
You don't like it then don't watch it
if i said GTA san andreas didn't have an AK 47 that's just disagreeing right
You act like a sjw when the solution is to accept criticism and stop trying to whiteknight your fav reviewer
It's not that hard to accept criticism my guy, stop trying to always be the one who's right
Lmao what
Then don't waste our time in the first place my man
"my fav reviewer" 💀
Go watch another one of his reviews to calm yourself
After I already said I disagree with almost everything he says
I just know how to not take criticism as a personal attack
And to let people voice their opinions
And not whine about it
That doesn't really change the matter much btw
Yes it does
He's not my favorite reviewer
I don't watch game reviews
I play them for myself
Yeah yet you take my criticism of him as a personal attack and say shit like "just don't watch his reviews"
I haven't watched a skillups video in months
Have criticism about a game ? "just don't play it"
I used to watch this week in videogames
like bro you're either with criticism or not, regardless of what it is
so either own up to it and deal with it or accept it
But I'm not though, I'm saying when you call something objectively wrong because he hurt your feewings don't pretend like the easiest solution isnt just to turn the video off
I was just making a counter claim to you saying he folds to the masses
When he very clearly doesn't
He likes hated games and dislikes loved games
It's what makes him as controversial as he is
" I'm saying when you call something objectively wrong because he hurt your feewings" He hurt my feelings about a game i haven't played yet ?(far cry 6) like bro can you tell how stupid you sound right now
He upset you about lost judgement and callisto
"don't pretend like the easiest solution isnt just to turn the video off" Once again using the don't like it don't play it take to shield any criticism
You kept bringing him up with callisto
"he didn't even play it"
"he probably just rushed through"
"he probably was in the easiest difficulty"
I'm not shielding criticism. U can say whatever u want about skill up, he's not my mom. Just realize that you don't have to be angry over his reviews if u just simply don't watch them
For starters when i watched his review i hadnt played the game yet and that's when i talked about him to express what i took from his review and what i was expecting, after i had played like 4 hours of it i came back to it to review it and what i said about him is that he just plain and simply said things that were objectively wrong which i specified
so i don't get where's your issue with that
like you seem upset because i'm giving criticism regarding his review
i can criticize his review however way i want after i play the game for myself, like just deal with it my guy lmfao
I ain't reading allat
yeah i said those things because once again, if you say a game has no side content when in fact it does the only logical explanation is you rushed through it and missed said side content
(which is a similar concession i got from aussie himself)
I take that as a concession then
Or his opinion is that it has no side content
That's a subjective criticism
Is it an opinion to say that 1 = 0 ?
It can't be that hard to understand
It also can't be that hard to understand that 1 is not equal to 0
Take it as whatever u want it's 1 a.m. and you're a grown man whining about a guy who made fun of a game you like
If you want to say that the game has side content that is insignificant that it isn't that impressive go ahead, it's just that when you say and i quote "has no side content" you're giving the info that it has NO SIDE CONTENT AT ALL
facts ≠ opinions
and that if a person like me who watched your review before playing the game, they'll go in expecting no side content at all which could once again sway them away from the game (in my case it was downloading so this wasnt the case)
Again, his opinion is that there's no side content
You're literally the one who made this about callisto again
@upbeat whale got 🎁 Present!
I was looking at his review in order to decide if i wanna buy far cry 6 or not
Like legit you keep saying i'm the one who's mentioning callisto when i was in fact talking about a completely different game lmfao
If he found no side content or no side content to be engaging enough, then that's his opinion
If you did find it engaging cool
Good for you
Like bro you're making it so clear that you are in fact hurt that i'm criticizing your guy, just i hope you realize that
Clearly that experience isn't shared
Yeah but that's not what he said and what he expressed in his review
Which is what i'm criticizing him for
If you say a game doesnt have something that could make or break it for me when it does you're essentially swaying me from buying it
(and thats literally what reviews are for, they give you an initial impression on whether a game is worth it or not)
It's his opinion
I like that you're acting like I'm a skillup fan who's defending him because I like him
When I am A.) Not a fan and B.) Not defending him
Now take his far cry 6 review for example, i'm 20 minutes in and he hasnt answered the one question i have for the game yet which is does this game offer a more linear approach or not, and he's already said something that i know is wrong which is this is the same game that we're used to since 3 as always (and considering 3 is a completely different game from 5 you get the point im trying to make i hope)
That's the impression you're giving me
It is the same shit
That's his opinion
It's also my opinion
As someone who enjoys the far cry series
They are all the same game besides the spinoffs which are actually unique
Ok so i'll ask you this, if i bought far cry 5 would it have a linear narrative ?
as in its the same as it was in 3
story mission after story mission ?
can you answer that
It's the same shit, u go to a waypoint, do a mission, progress the story
answer the question
.
Read dawg
answer that question
U blind as shit
Did you play far cry 5 dude ?
Yes it's my favorite far cry
Is it STORY mission after STORY mission like 3, or do you have to go farm a certain region to liberate it then get a story mission ?
It's the same shit
and did you play 3 ?
Yes I've played every single far cry since 2
Yes you go to a marker, do a mission, and progress
Just because it's labeled a side mission doesn't mean anything
Can you stop trying to dodge the question dude ?
So clearing random outpost #500 is a story mission right
Whether I have to destroy 5 cultist vehicles as a side mission or destroy 5 pirate vehicles as a main mission it's the same shit
lmfao
Yeah that's all i had to hear my guy
That's all they ever boil down too
"defend this area" "blow this up"
Okay now watch cutscene
Oh shoot cool mohawked guy kidnapped me again
Time to stealth mission my way out
Rinse repeat through all the games
Thanks for proving you didn't actually play any of the games before 5
Lmao okay dude
the prologue of the game btw
Whatever you say
Look dude the fact that you said clearing random outpost #904 is also a story mission says it all
That's a concession on its own
like thanks for proving you're the exact reason why ubisoft won't change their formula, i already had an impression of that considering you said wildlands was a great game but still
Ice played the beginning of fc2, played fc3 5 times, played fc4 once, played primal but didn't finish it, played 5 3 times, played new dawn but didn't finish it, and played fc6
out of curiosity whats your take on 6 ?
They are all just mid games with the same exact gameplay loop and mission design
just to know whether to get it or not
It's fun because I enjoy the basic far cry formula of blowing shit up and having fun
If you don't enjoy that you won't like it
The games are nothing more than generic
I did enjoy that ever since the first game, what i'm asking you about is it a garbage copy paste clear region type game like they've all been since primal
or is the side stuff actually separated like the first 4 did
Because it is great. To me. I appreciate that the game doesn't try to do these shitty story missions like breakpoint did, they just let you play. The mission is just "clear the outpost" and you get too choose however which way to go about that
That's what sandboxes are all about
Loose mission structure
You are supposed to have fun
It's why rockstars missions kinda suck dick
They punish you for having any level of fun and give you no freedom
You have to just play exactly as r* wants you too
no like i get that, i've already expressed this many times with you, i get that you enjoy generic copy pasted games that took 10 minutes to make and are just reskinned throughout, that's your opinion and you're allowed to enjoy them
now about this
Yes everything is just copy and pasted and spammed around. You'll be clearing the same exact checkpoints, same outposts, etc
The one cool thing is that there's a proper city in the map
Which is new for the series
btw about this, didn't you say RDR2 was your fav game of all time ?
I'm saying I enjoy one like that
One gane
Not every fucking game dude
Yes
i don't really care for those, it's just that are the story missions separated or locked behind clearing regions
And the game has terrible mission design
like is it mission 1 - mission 2 - mission 3 or prologue - introduction to regions - go clear region 1 - mission 1 - cutscene - go clear region 2 - mission 2 - cutscene like far cry 5
Some are some aren't. The game has story missions but it's like far cry 5 in the sense that you choose which provinces to target first
yeah as obscene as this take is it's yours and i'll respect that
Rockstar gives you a fail state for not doing exactly what you are told
Watch the nakeyjakey video
so like say i don't want to clear the provinces at all, i can just play the story missions in order and do some side stuff if i'm burnt out with the story right
mom's back and she's soooo ticked like oh my goodness lookout
thank you for being so patient :)
this video has a lot to digest so here's timestamps for the 3 chapters if you wanna take your time with it
Chapter 1 - Anthony Burch & Legos 01:54
Chapter 2 - WANTED: DEAD or... probably dead 13:21
Chapter 3 - I wanna be a cowboy, baby 24:14
Sup...
No cause the story missions are province specific
So you are going through them but also clearing the province
Cause the missions are badic
Clear outpost, defend area, blow up this car
That's the majority of what you'll be doing
It's not like 5 where u go help x side character and raise a bar
i already understand what you want from a game, you want to be able to spawn in the mission, run around as far as you want then wait for the AI to follow you to the edge of the map and then kill him, or have the creative liberty to take on a certain section in any way you want, so whenever you don't find that you instantly hate the system of the game
There's a mini story tied to each region and doing them progresses the overall story
oh
But the story is bad imo
There's only one character I liked
And the main villain was not good
skillups said gustavo's character is dead
Despite being gus
he said you dont interact with him for 85% of the game
if thats true then uhhhhhh

thats a just cause game
like its funny because i first made this comparison in 5
i said these games are gonna eventually become first person just cause games
and it seems like thats the case
Watch the nakeyjakey video.
I don't want any of what you described. I want to be able to attempt stealth in a stealth mission, I want to be able to literally walk without a fail state occurring, please just watch the video
there's a dictator, go kill him by clearing out the regions he controls and his mini goons
You don't interact with him for 95% of the game
do that through blowing up shit and doing the same activities for the majority of the game
like thats a just cause game
There's only 2 scenes where the protagonist and antagonist are in the same scene
i'm watching it rn
what
One at the beginning and one at the end
The rest are just u seeing Gus on the news or in some random cutscene
He's hardly even in the game
And when he his he's got these shitty woke politics to spew
Clearly written by tone deaf liberals with green hair in the Ubisoft office
Instead of trying to say anything meaningful like 3 or 5 it's just "white people bad cause slavery"
Like wow Ubisoft I never knew slavery was bad 😱
i legit want to like a far cry game, for a while now
but like
primal was the last one i liked and that was for the gameplay
i dismissed the region system in that game because i thought due to the reception of that game they were gonna forget it
but they didnt
and ever since its been going down to shit
Ad much as I respect building an entire language for your game, it totally ruined it for me
I hate those spinoffs tbh
Only one I like is blood dragon
They are definitely unique though
Turning the game into a survival RPG in new dawn was completely silly
Definitely not the move
@shrewd sparrow i'm 5 mins in the video and a quick timeout
i get what he's saying totally, and that's something i myself experienced when i replayed AC4 recently
that game is considered to be the best AC game for most people, but the fact is 80% of its missions are tail this person to a spot without being seen, and do it in a certain way that the game doesnt think you're too far before those 5 seconds go and it fails you, then kill them
which made it a drag for me personally, like when i realized this i barely was getting through the game to try and finish it, the only parts i genuinely still enjoyed as much as i did when i played it for the first time were the ship battles
on this note i get what you're saying, the thing is however i never had that same vibe with the rockstar games, the strat he mentioned in the beginning was actually surprising to me because i do remember doing stuff like that in those games too, it's nice to know other people also used to do it, i think if you can make a game that's linear and not non linear as the guy termed it while still avoiding that vibe where you feel like you're constrained it's a W, and tbh from my experience with RDR2 it's a bad example to give
like if you wanna talk about non linear mission design there's 2 types that stick out like a sore thumb on being the opposite of this, that's chase / tail missions as well as missions where you need to protect someone and make sure they don't die
if you step outside these 2 from my experience anything rockstar has made in the modern age is flexible enough in allowing you to do what you want without giving you a failed state that you can consider it non linear design
@shrewd sparrow i get the guy's criticism, it's actually valid and obviously that's his take, this is one of those situations however where i find myself with the exact opposite opinion on the matter
he mentioned one GTA 4 mission which is actually reminiscent of vice city's hitman missions system where a guy calls you, gives you instructions on a certain randomly generated npc and tells you to go kill them, which like he said is the equivalent of a lego setpiece, it's gonna be different for everyone right
but that's where i disagree with him, the fact is it's different but that on its own creates an even bigger issue, it's still a randomly generated npc and when you do that you sacrifice the control you have over the mission in making it as great as you can since you're specifically designing it and how it plays out and going for a more general randomized take that you can only do so much in
so yeah it's an interesting take and i respect that's how he feels but i disagree
i feel like at this day and age there's 2 types of players when it comes to basic game mechanics, you either love randomly generated generic shit because it's different and you have that neural activation of hey its different - that means i have freedom! i love this design or you actually prefer something that's controlled and designed to be A tier, i personally found that after playing enough of those random generic shit you realize it's garbage and get a phobia for them 
I'd much rather have freedom
Ghost recon Wildlands has far more replay value than the last of us
And that's why I'm playing a game
I don't play games for one and done experiences that I could get from say - a movie
It's why I can't reply the last of us, why I can't finish it's sequel, likely contributes to me not being able to finish god of war
Even though the story of God of War is really intriguing and the gameplay was really fun
I don't like being railroaded
I mean I've played through RDR2 5 times but that's because the story is just very compelling and also I know that everytime I finish a mission the sandbox will give me the freedom I crave
Yeah no i get what you're saying completely, it's the opposite to me not being able to finish wildlands, breakpoint or far cry 5, you like playing the same shit over and over again as long as it gives you freedom on how to do it and that's fine but for me personally i don't
And I remain hopeful for a rockstar game to have freedom in mission and in sandbox
god of war is a bad example if you ask me btw, since it never really gives you a fail state or anything
Breakpoint isn't like that
Breakpoint railroads you
It rarely gives you freedom in it's missions
They're still going y'all
What
Riz try to be on topic for once challenge :
We can't speak?
Ah yes water is wet
No
THEY ARE STILL TALKING????
@molten pewter got 🎁 Present!
Stop speaking
Freedom of speech is a myth
Yes but it's rollercoaster game design
Bro's getting hyper over a joke, chill out bruh idc what y'all are talking about anyway 🤣
Bye bois
i didn't like it because i did some of those villas missions and those felt like straight from wildlands, get in kill the guards loot the place around until the game finds what it's looking for and ticks the checkbox then get out
No Wildlands wasn't like that
Breakpoints missions are all structured around finding a piece of intel
Then consulting it in the documents
Then rinse and repeat
It's actually just the same mission over and over again but it railroads you to playing a certain way
"remain undetected" is the main one
Wildlands had very few missions forcing you to stay stealth
Stealth was encouraged because well it's ghost recon
But you were never forced into it
if i had to give my take on wildlands it would be this, i played it for 9 hours and it gave me the same repetitive garbage vibe thats seen in both the modern ghost recon and far cry games, go to an outpost kill enough randomly generated npcs and get out, which is the same thing just cause 3 also had, by the time i get to half the game i'm just
already, theres no actual progression in the game it's just you going around leaving a bloodbath behind you, you explore all the game has to offer mechanics wise by that time and since there's no plot to back it up in the first place it's just an empty experience
Not never, just seldom
Everything here is right besides you saying that there's no progression or no plot because both are untrue
Wildlands actually has multiple different progression systems
And the plot of Wildlands isn't necessarily awful if you pay attention to atleast the main cutscenes for like taking down one of the leaders
It's certainly not good
And the ending is awful
But the plot is very fitting for the game
Cool guy action hero: too cool to die, turns in all the bad guys to his female superior
the plot is as thick as a just cause game, there's a dictator, kill his goons to get to him, the only interesting thing about the plot for me was when i saw the ending on someone's stream who was playing it dont remember who, the fact that the USA can actually side with him and protect him (which is realistic) but literally other than that its just ooga booga kill goon 1 - kill goon 2 - kill goon 3 to get to big boss goon
also the shock value in how that rebel guy betrays you and he throws his head around too
what i meant when i said theres no progression is that the experience of playing the final mission of the game is surprisingly similar to when you're just starting out, you'll have NPCs on your side aiding you and will have better loot / gear but that's about it, for me these types of games miss plot factors that make you feel what you've been through, the only case i can excuse this is the souls games, i have like 2 bosses left in DS2 but these games make up for themselves in that aspect because of the struggle you have to go through to get to the end, and the plot that the game has actually has an interesting and somewhat vague-ish end goal, in wildlands i never felt like that, it was just like cool, i'm done with another outpost, lets move on to the next so i can get one step closer to killing the bad guy
Because it's an open world sandbox game. That's what these games are all about
Ghost Recon is a very arcadey shooter
The stories have always been over the top and cheesy
While also lacking substance
That's why I think open world was such a W for ghost recon
You can ignore the arcadey bullshit if you like the gameplay
Then clearing outposts doesn't feel like a chore, it's fun
If you don't like that then it's not your type of game
i know, and that's why i said you're allowed to like them if that's what gives you fun, it's just that not everyone has that take, what i'd love to see them try is take a more AC like approach, where they can keep that aspect of the open world outposts and shit but at the same time keep a good overall game
i've already said this before with far cry primal, the only thing that got me through that game was its fun gameplay
AC is more bullshit than ghost recon is
however if you take that away in a future game it just becomes exposed
Epic 100 hour story of "kill this fucker" then level up with a bunch of meaningless numbers and now "go kill that fucker"
I couldn't finish Valhalla
There was no coherent story
Just a bunch of random mini stories
It was like the worst anthology you could ever consume
The point is it can be anyone's type of game, like how i enjoyed primal, the problem is that how likely you are to like a game that uses this system is very low compared to how you'll like the next rockstar game
Disparate content, only connected through one guy's pov who btw is the most blandest mf
the rpg progression in the modern AC games is 
which is why im hopeful for mirage
any RPG game that forces you to grind it is dumb
which is why i love the god of war games
you don't have to grind anything, and the side quests are actually original and not copy pasted trash so you actually want to play them
the loot as well isn't hey this is a level 5 blade not a level 9 one
Imma contribute to this conversation
yeah the new GOW games have great progression
you can just do the story if you wish but exploration is heavily encouraged
the fact that it gives you freedom is what I love unlike ac origins which I dropped cuz I had to level up 5 levels to progress the story
Like if you're going to force me to do side stuff, at least make it compelling like tw3
@untold swift got 🎁 Present!
yes
W take
uncommon riz W
common
TW3 also did progression very well, you're never forced to go out an explore
unless you want to go to later level areas like skellige
Yes but games shouldnt be made for everyone. If you don't like a games gameplay then move on from it, because that's the most important aspect of videogames.
I don't think the second half is true. Just because you like ghost recons non-linear missions doesn't make you predisposed to disliking RDR2s linear missions.
There's a lot of people that like sandbox games and non linear missions structure but couldn't give less of a shit about the story.
Ghost recon, far cry, just cause, that shit is great for that type of player. Even the old GTA games, just video game junk food to entertain the mind, bar ghost recon where a lot of the replayability for us gr players come from self imposed challenges (forcing immersion, playing with no HUD, roleplaying, etc.)
I think I'm literally the perfect example of this. RDR2 is my favorite game of all time despite hating it's mission structure? Why? Well because I actually do find the story compelling enough to keep playing main missions, hell I love the story to have played through it 5 times...
But red dead redemption 2 also has what I find to be a very enjoying gameplay loop and it has a good enough sandbox outside of missions. So I can have my fun in the sandbox and consume the missions like it's a last of us game, sure whatever.
I simply just don't see why that disconnect needs to exist though. Why not just combine the two elements and give you freedom to approach missions how you want? It's only a net positive for everyone involved. Instead of spoon-feeding everything to you in missions just let you play, give you an objective and let you do it. It wouldn't ruin the experience for anyone
but that's done so people dont go out of their way to break the story's structure

RDR2's mission structure sucks yeah
I'll answer your last point with your first one, "Yes but games shouldnt be made for everyone. If you don't like a games gameplay then move on from it, because that's the most important aspect of videogames."
it definitely has some goofy gameplay designs
if the world wasnt as pretty and as immersive then I'd have hated it 
but rdr2 is so well made that you'll literally get off your horse and hunt deer for 4 hours and still have fun

Yeah that's my point. I'm showing why that mass market appeal bullshit fails cause not everyone is gonna like every game
Yet RDR2 would only benefit from non-linear missions
anyway so here's why the modern GOW games suck 🥱
On a more serious note tho i imagine it has to do more with the technical limitations of their engine, take for example how online missions in GTA games have no AI whatsoever present on the map, and how certain NPCs interact with each other, imagine if you're playing a mission, you try to take the freedom in traveling halfway across the map and one of your companion NPCs gets hit by a train and you get a fail state again
It's a sandbox game that's the point
the older GOW games were visceral but the newer ones are for 12 yr olds 🤓
the old games had boobs where the titties go?!
the new ones have atreus 🤢

true
the old ones also had sex
clearly the superior game
cant really argue with that one, no one can
You're not showing anything dude, you're contradicting yourself by saying games arent made for everyone and if you don't like how a game is move on from it yet complaining about RDR2's mission structure should be like the ghost recon games, they're not and they're great, and should stay that way.
but yeah in all seriousness, I really miss the action and spectacle that the older games had, thought ragnarok would have more spectacle tbh but 'ragnarok' was so disappointing
Nope, never said that
thats because the same community always cries about everything
the GOW community is a bit problematic
i mean people have been crying about gmgow's difficulty for a while now, even back in 2018
"that boss has a pattern i cant read" boohoo it isnt a fucking souls game, deal with it or lower the difficulty lmfao
see, I think the newer games are fucking amazing but I think they're unnecessary
after GOW3 the series should've just ended
you went back to giving an L take
it was the perfect ending, even tho I dont dislike the newer ones
yes

that's facts
but it doesn't change the fact that they're unnecessary, but because of them GOW is still prominent
Never played a GOW game till 4 and never played one since
I'm not talking about whether or not there needed to be new GOW games, but did this story really need to be told is the question
@molten pewter got 🎁 Present!
if you play it, start from 3
I wish I could get into it
they're great since they're still keeping the torch warm until we can see most devs being able to make games of their same quality
(start from 1)
I want to love it
@molten pewter got 🎁 Present!
No I don't want to play those old ones
yes, I understand that, like I said they're great games, it's just that the arc that they cover with kratos is incredible, but is it a story that needed to be told is the question
No
thats the same question with does AC need to continue ? and theres no definitive answer to it
play them
yes
I think I just have to give up trying to like them
same question but AC went the wrong route, GOW went the right route
Especially since all my friends spoiled Ragnarok for me
you know there's the old games that are absolutely amazing right? ☠️
they're action games
i think every franchise eventually has to end, which is why they're not releasing yearly games
the next mythology is probably gonna be the last one for the god of war franchise
yes, which is exactly my problem for GOW
which is why i invite people to appreciate these games as much as they can while we still have them
they're still planning to continue it
its not like AC where they'll still be making them by 2040
hopefully
It's not a problem with me not enjoying the games it's a problem with me not being able to get into them because I know the story
The only game I don't know the story of is GOW4
but that game is too long
the first three gow games are unrelated to the story of the newer ones, unless u know the story of the old ones
@molten pewter got 🎁 Present!
the old ones are also heavily gameplay oriented
Like when I got mimir and my friends told me I wasn't even halfway I was genuinely pissed
i don't see the problem, one more mythology and then that's it, like i said they're keeping the torch warm for up and coming devs until the market learns to make games like them, it's how quantic dream are making a star wars game now
you're EXACTLY halfway through
who said that 😭
and supermassive came from what they made
I hope they stop it eventually, because it feels like milking after a point
Still I have like 25 hours on my save I'm sorry that's way too damn long for me
how is it too long tho
I can't play railroad games for 50 hours
like DS2 is longer and that game's a shitshow of a game, literally worthless
I finished ragnarok in 21
☠️
the old GOW games arent even long, I finished 3 in a day
they
bruh
didn't you say RDR2 is your fav game
they're extremely spectacular and short and sweet
Riz ready to put the game into the easiest difficulty and tell me "they ain't that long"
@molten pewter got 🎁 Present!
what?
I played on give me no mercy


@molten pewter got 🎁 Present!
Yeah right bud
the older ones are just short no matter the difficulty

even if I played on the hardest difficulty it'd be like 10-11 hours
what was your playtime in that game
RDR2 is longer than GOW 2018 dude
I have 1000 hours in it, I have completed the story 5 times
No shit
Nice counting genius
yeah and what im telling you is if you could finish RDR2 you wont have a problem with 2018
like 2018 is 3/5 of RDR2's length
I think it's exactly half of rdr2's length
I do because the story and world are less interesting so I'm only playing for the gameplay at that point which is fun but basic and doesn't carry the game enough for me
yeah it really depends on what you do in both games
they both have actual good side quests
so you'll prob wanna mix in between the main and side of both of them
man i wanna replay RDR2 for the 100th time now

fucks sakes that game is too goated
GOW2018 didnt have as intriguing side quests as ragnarok
I'm not even gonna talk about the old gow games cuz they're super linear
and no the 'difficulty 🤓 ' doesnt matter, I played on medium
i havent finished ragnarok yet to give a final take but like 2018 was the standard i was using for how side quests should be in a game back when it came out
all original, no garbage, just 📠 no 🧢
I think i didnt do side stuff in 2018
I did one
the faufnir one
where the dwarf is a dragon
(I think?)
yeah i understand that if you're not interested in the plot / world it can turn into one of those experiences, altho if you were able to playthrough wildlands which had no plot and good gameplay i'm sure you'll be able to play through a game with actual plot and gameplay too
idk I dont like GOW2018 much

L bozo
Red dead redemption 2 has an amazing world, to where I'd find new things even in a 4th, 5th playthrough. Even the story, all the character nuances you don't pick up on at first. Its just such a well made game, not that GOW4 isn't but it just doesn't capture me the same.
Where RDR2 fills it's runtime with epic set pieces, wonderful drama, awesome heists, and nuanced character interactions GOW4 pads it's game with shitty puzzles that you get handheld through anyway, shallow exploration in a pseudo open world, and an admittedly compelling story but just not enough for me
@honest creek got 🎁 Present!
true I hate GOW4
but have you played GOW3

it has sex
you get to fuck aphrodite, kill her husband, come back and fuck her again
(it genuinely shocked me)
once again proves you're just speaking out of your ass, GOW4 didn't have handheld puzzles my guy
yeah lol
like bro please get an original take that isn't from youtube reviews
GOW4 doesnt have handheld puzzles that's in GOWR 💀
But Wildlands gave me freedom and didn't make me do shit exactly as it's told to me. Also you're bringing up thai comparison which is silly,.I would have never made it
And before you try to put the words into my mouth, I'm not saying Wildlands is better than gow4
yeah man, I'm sorry but that's wrong facts
the puzzle thing
GOW4 doesnt have good puzzles anyway
but yeah
Yes it does.
Kratos saying "let me move this over here" Atreus saying "I could shoot that!"
No
what the fuck
Like stfu Atreus
kratos doesnt even speak
neither does atreus, except for to give lore info
same with mimir
😭
that's on GOWR
it's mostly about lore
they dont give hints about puzzles in GOW2018
there are none, and I've recently played the game so it's fresh in my memory
now the puzzles are shitty, but that's beside the point
I just remember the game handholding way too much
kratos would never be the type of mf to say 'lemme go over there' 😭
😭 I'm sorry you're remembering wrong bruh
there's some puzzle handholding in GOWR
I'm not because it literally made me stop playing the game
but that's it
Was those awful "puzzles"
no like i'm not trying to put words in your mouth, i'm just pointing out how i respect your take but i'm inviting you to reconsider how 2018 isn't a handheld game, it doesn't even do the fail state thing r$ games do, if you don't wanna be somewhere you can just leave for most of the times
and the game is much more open in terms of letting you do what you want to, you can literally turn off the HUD and go where ever you want to (assuming you have the means to currently)
@molten pewter got 🎁 Present!
this guy when he gets to the garden of olympia in GOW3 (best puzzle)
literally got me stuck
but then I figured it out and it was so cool
If they didn't handhold in gow4 then the puzzles were likely too simple
anyway, bad puzzle design isnt the topic, it's whether or not GOW2018 has handholding and the answer to that is no, it doesnt have any
those awful puzzles that there's like 4 of in the entire game right, all of which are 20 - 30 seconds max ?
yes
I'm misremembering
the puzzles suck
now you're literally backpedaling on what you said and still choosing a reason to hate it
I think I'm conflating it with horizon
like bro i get it you don't wanna like the game, i've already told you that's fine, just please don't do the act everyone does of shitting on it for absolutely no reason
Bro it is 3AM and you're putting me in the spot
i'm not
I dont remember any gow2018 puzzles except for that one super annoying puzzle where kratos gets stuck and atreus has to free him by doing a combination of sun and moon and that shit, but jpik isnt even at that point
it's in tyr's temple
i've told you 50000 times this is just how i talk to people, it's normal
we're just having a conversation 
Put words in my mouth why don't you
anyway @shrewd sparrow imma do you a favour
the new GOW games are story driven, but the old ones are like nier automata (action games) play them tomorrow
You don't fucking speak for me
GOW1, 2 and 3 are pure class
I don't own them
so fucking good
you have a ps5 right?
I think I can play 3
just get ps+ 
i'm literally barely halfway through ragnarok and it already has more puzzles than 2018 did, the game had those chest rune puzzles you have to throw your axe at, any other puzzle that was in it isn't memorable to me
I have ps+extra
I'd recommend 3, but you should watch a brief plot summary first cuz GOW3 starts immediately after GOW2
like immediately
like 2 seconds after GOW2
it starts exactly at the end of GOW2
I really don't think I'll care for it but I'll consider it
I'm not gonna play them now
you said you love hyper violence in your games right?
like a lot of violence?
the old GOW games are just pure violence and adrenaline
Yeah and that's also what I liked in GOW4
I liked the brutality
And the gameplay
well GOW4 is like a hello kitty game compared to GOW3
And the story
you can literally rip peoples' heads off with the press of a button
i'm not lmfao, i'm giving you the impression you're giving me with what you're saying, "If they didn't handhold in gow4 then the puzzles were likely too simple", no bro if you're gonna say the puzzles are too simple i am gonna call you out for it and i'm not putting words in your mouth by saying you're choosing to hate on the game because that's exactly what you're doing, so own up to it
Which is why it makes me genuinely fucking angry when @charred gust says some shit like "like bro I get you don't wanna like the game" when I decide to say one thing I dislike in a sea of compliments
well here's what imma say
just play the first 10 mins of GOW3 that's all you'll need to decide whether or not you want to play it

no spoilers.
me when tyr's temple ragnarök puzzle
oh yeah that one
jeez it was a pain in the ass
but you didnt say anything, you literally proved you didn't know what you were talking about so whatever you said after that is just you saying whatever
or the winds of hel rings in that same area
'move that 🤓 ' 'move this'
like i hope this is clear
like bro shut up
you're confusing ragnarok with 2018
ragnarok doesnt have hel rings
I'm talking about 2018 in both
anyway @shrewd sparrow what's ur opinion on hack n slash games
the real reason I'm recommending the old GOW games are cuz they're hack n slash
(and they're extremely good)
I'm calling it the ragnarök puzzle cuz skol and hati
GOW3 is definitely my second favourite game of all time
that fucking sucked
that's what I'm talking about too
GOW2018 had some of the worst puzzles
this is legit a common thing i see with people, i try to give them the benefit of the doubt of saying they played both recently and confused them but more often than not that's not the case
Yes both of those are in 2018
Hera's chalice diamond thingy
yes I had fun with that one
took me a while to figure it out, but it wasnt annoying
gardens of olympia
the only part I didnt like was the last part with pandora
i was frustrated at first but after finishing it i came to develop an appreciation for it
where she's drowning?
stfu fucking pre born atreus looking ass
yes
atreus 0.5
it wasnt difficult, her voice was annoying
riz
and at that point I was kratos 
do you got rizz
yes
kratos really changed fr 
I did gow3 sex minigame 4 times!!
2 times before killing her husband (wont spoil
)
and 2 times after!
Wait did Poseidon princess get crushed by the lever i don't remember
yes

she turns into soup
before the time of sjws

and getting canceled over anything
they're so fucking crazy it's genuinely insane
"so own up to it"
When did I say I hate the game? When did I even say I dislike it?
You see why I say you take criticisms to a game you like as personal attacks and then once you get defensive you just can't get over yourself
I literally said I like the gameplay, that I like the story, and that I liked the world (just not as compelling as RDR2)
Then I criticised it for being too long, and for the puzzles handholding me too much. Which I swore they did because I always found the puzzles a trivial and meaningless inclusion to just pad the game out. But I'm taking yours and riz' word for it because it's 3am and I could have been mistaken that they handhold you and the actual problem was that they were just too simple.
I know you don't have the capacity to admit when you are wrong about something, so it's hard to realize when you see me doing it. But just because I concede one point doesn't make another untrue, and it certainly doesn't mean I'm "backpedaling"
I knew what kratos was gonna do with poseidon's princess
but the fact that you can fuck aphrodite after you kill her husband
young kratos was insane
me waiting for a circle to appear over a female character in GoW:R (why isn't it happening yet)
I love how many innocent people you can kill too
dude when the circle appeared over her head I laughed so loud I'm telling you
😭
I like them. MGR and Nier 👍
yeah well the old GOW games are hack n slash and imo have much better gameplay than the new games
just an opinion z2k, dont get mad btw

I love the combat
NAHHHHHHHH FUCKER SPOILED IT FOR ME
lmaoooo
fuck you rizz
You already know you have to say that
Not in GOWR, talking about GOW3
Ohhhhh
Or you get a paragraph about why you're wrong and why you need to accept reality
Kratos is the original city boy
They can
the old gow games are fucking insane I'm telling you @shrewd sparrow
Kratos literally asks mimir if he taught atreus how to fuck somebody

I watched critical play the trilogy
(literally)
That's why I already know the story
once again you're writing an essay to not saying anything, i'll ask you to stop using the victim card and saying i'm taking your criticism as a personal attack when all i've been doing is correcting you or anyone for that matter who says incorrect shit, you said something that isn't true and i corrected you for it (the handholding in puzzles not being a thing in 2018), learn to accept that, as far as whether you backpedaled or not you literally said "If they didn't handhold in gow4 then the puzzles were likely too simple", how is this not backpedaling ? its you like i said still trying to shit on the game's puzzles which like i said is you saying whatever after being proven wrong
stop playing the victim card and deal with it my guy
not an issue, game's still fun to play
truth
I can’t speak for the old GOW games since I’ve only watched cutscenes
the guy tried to shit on 2018 by using the same argument people shit on ragnarok with (handholding)
and he just can't deal with it once me and riz called him out for it
like my god
😔
no one knows 😭
GOW 1 desert puzzle had child 5~8 year old (i think?) me questioning my own sanity
@strange wadi got 🎁 Present!
me after playing the old GOW games: (I dislike the new ones now
)
Incorrect shit? No, my opinion
"Learn to accept that," I already did
"How is that not backpedaling" because WHY the puzzles are bad is semantics, the point is that they are bad
I already said
Disliking one part of the game is not shitting on it
garden of olympia puzzle has to be the most rewarding puzzle in the game
I played all 5 main GOW games, they're all bangers
🥶
GOW2018 doesnt have good puzzles.
Just cause I misremembered the reason I didn't like the puzzles doesn't make the criticism less valid
they pad out game time and are literally useless
same
dont like 2018

i like them all
Especially when I told him about so many aspects that I really really enjoyed
I think 2018 is okay
I can only think of the Nurn chests or whatever they’re called, and the stuff in Tyr’s Temple
the point is in the fact that he tried to use a point that isn't even existent in the first place, it's one thing to say you didn't like the puzzles, no one's arguing on that, it's another to blatantly use the criticism of the 2nd game on the 1st, it just shows you're hating on it for the sake of hating on it
Then I say one thing bad
I love the story, just not the gameplay
rizz when you were a child did you think pumping red orbs into a weapon without fully upgrading it would increase its' damage?
nornir chests are rewarding cuz you get upgrades from them, but the stuff in tyr's temple were just bad imo
No it just shows that he doesn’t like that one part of the game
important question
i'm literally not saying i disregard your criticism, i can literally link my message where i said i respect it
I didnt play the old gow games when I was a kid
it's just important to not say shit that doesnt represent what the game is
ah
no one knows
The original placebo effect
It wasn't even a criticism of the second game 😂 I never played Ragnarok lmaoooo. I just got gow4 confused with horizon
I was thinking about forbidden West when I was talking about handholding
Once again u just wanna put words in my mouth
yeah that was kinda dumb
"I hate how game 1 did what game 2 did", do you see the issue in this statement ?
for example, I support jpik here
but I dont agree with his game time argument
like there's no logic in it
i would be in the middle of a bossfight and then I'd just put all my red orbs into a weapon without upgrading, and was like "DAMN I'M DEMOLISHING THIS BOSS NOW"
I think GOW2018 is average length
😭
"THIS SHIT DOING MORE DAMAGE‼️‼️"
Riz 🤝
If the statement were true there’s nothing wrong with it. The only issue is that the statement is wrong. Nothing more to it than that
no one understands
Lmao I didn't even know Ragnarok had handhelds till rn. All I knew was some story spoilers because my friends told me
I never watched any content on Ragnarok
Not a single video
Yet this fool is saying that I'm taking other people's criticism of Ragnarok then applying it to gow4 when really I just made a mistake
it is wrong and that's where the problem is, spreading around info that's wrong and everyone knows how easy info gets around and how easy people these days take other's takes as their own
so when you do that what happens if you have this large chunk of people who will take that wrong info and use it as their own in the future, and thats how false shit spreads around and why you have many people who have no idea what they're talking about
And wasn’t that just corrected? How come this got drawn out so much over one thing?
in think gow2018 has some lame stuff to pad out gametime: shit bosses, bad puzzles, mid exploration 
what
this topic was supposed to end when i told you this was just a conversation btw
yeah he even admitted he was wrong
you're the one who replied back bringing it up again
@charred gust he said it was 3 am and he was misremembering stuff
jpik said this like 10 mins ago

Like fr
that
idk either, i was literally expressive of how it was over myself
bruh
It was an accident
that's why I stopped arguing with him
cuz he just straight up admitted he was being kinda silly

ZK you were the one who stretched this out by going DEFCON 1 all over Jpik for it lmao
It's not a wrong criticism it's just the wrong context applied to the criticism
Even after Jpik was like “oh yeah I was wrong”
jeez I just cant get over GOW3 man 😔
such a good gaming
and as you can see it isnt my fault 
clearly you're restarted 
so please next time get your context right
Yeah guys it's not his fault
aussie can we ban this guy!?
Oh my god
He "ended" the discussion before I could reply
the conversation is literally up there my guy
It's not his fault
I didn’t have any words to say because I don’t even know how to respond to this… this? Wtf is this?
Get your context right fellas

to prove to you that i am indeed on the side who wants to end it
ignore all that
and just

This is actual trollery or extremely uh… I don’t even know how to describe it
Yeah dude whatever u say
what i say is
did y'all know, arcane won best video game adaptation


no way
I think arcane is better than edgerunners tbh 
RIZ
@strange wadi got 🎁 Present!
Birbman 
yeah I was like you, until I watched arcane

Yeah no, reading all of it back Z2 was basically hammering on to Jpik that he should stop hating the game when Jpik was like “no I like the game wtf”
:Z2K1 wtf:
So ill be birbman untill midday
“I am right about you hating the game, if you respond then you are continuing and stretching out the argument” -Z2
see, jpik dragged it a bit but then he agreed that he was wrong
I just had such a monumental belly laugh
which is why I LITERALLY stopped arguing
@pseudo swallow got 🎁 Present!
like I've been here for a while so I know that jpik was wrong, but then I just saw z2k continuing 😭
oh my god
chill out guys 🤓 it's just gaming
Othergames is just arguement channel
Averge othergames discussion?
@earnest shale got 🎁 Present!
i just saw this message, normally i'd reply back and try to point out how you're wrong but what i am going to point out is how you're both literally the ones still dragging it on rn when the topic has been changed already ?
yeah
Lmaooooo
now for the 2nd time, both of you quit it
More arguing
and just
well, just admit you're wrong man


Hi, game bad something something big drama oh oh ooh ohoho ohh OOHHH OHHO HOOHOHHOH

alright guys argument over, now who here has watched arcane
the topic was literally switched they were talking about arcane
now, I did watch arcane and downloaded league of legends
Honestly tbf I did bring it back


It was funny as hell though
this ended badly
I deleted LoL IMMEDIATELY
Like c'mon dude "get your context right"
can you both especially you @leaden orchid stop proving you're the most immature mod and accept that the topic has moved past it ?
now for the last time

Like, i played for 5 mins and was like nahhhh
loooool
and move on
wtf bro

like
😂😂😂😂😂😂
Most immature mod!
No wayyuuu
guys this is me btw
ong wtf 😭
Look Im not defending the game here but the tutorial is pretty fard @normal crown
yeah
it sucks
My point exactly. You make a wrong statement (Jpik must hate GOW), we correct it, you “call us out” for dragging it on.
You said yourself earlier how much you hate people giving wrong impressions on things, you’re being hypocritical if you’re acting this way over US trying to correct you over something and then acting this way.
Not representative of actual game
let the topic move on challenge : impossible
once again, i'd argue but to prove my point rn
you're right

:banned:
Admit you're wrong and look like a doofus rn : impossible
now let's forget it and move on
bro's
Well there you go
Forgor :apollo:
Apollo Fluffy Cat is a :devfluff: at Techland, unboxing YouTuber and Jori's best friend.
using
as a passive aggressive emoji
That’s all that was needed
(i hope that's okay to calm both of you down and finally let this to rest)
all you had to do was make it a challenge
It only took calling Aussie immature
arcane is so fucking good lemme tell you why
I’m also going to have good faith and assume that’s not the case
in one of the scenes, ekko, one of the characters, licks his FUCKING LIPS
i had no idea that's all it usually takes
this whole ass show has no motion capture

Honestly I stopped giving a shit really, once I started laughing I couldn't stop
but he licks his lips before speaking
It was the same as the reshit refart situation
ik it sounds like such a small thing, but it adds so much more depth to all the characters
That came to no middle ground conclusion tho really

🤝 me rn
And it’s weird how this one came to personal insults like the monke emote that Villker is sending
Nah I was able to close it with him
this is literally me
it actually did, you just werent around to see it
Basically he was just saying he doesn't agree that it should be called a remake
Oh well if that’s true that’s great
anyway, so imma talk about GOWR and start another argument
I was under the impression that he still thought that DER is not a remake
oh my god
Long 3 months ahead of waiting
like think about it
again with remakes and remasters