#šÆļø±other-games
1 messages Ā· Page 55 of 1
the pari 
It also has some of the hardest crescendos in the game. I doubt most of us will get through it. It'll just be no saferooms made throughout.
map full of insta kills
I like The Sacrifice, but I don't think Alp does, lol.
It's better than the Passing, we could play it.
I'm down for it. Let's just make sure Dok doesn't enable two generators at the same time.
We should do a campaign tier list.
enable all 3 at once
on vs
Sure thing.
Hard Rain:
S:
A+:
A:
B:
C:
D:
E:
F:

Keep yourself very safe.
If you wanna go that way, lol to you as well.
If you're actually doing it, tell me when you're going to post it. 
Did he just put Hard Rain in... I can't believe this.
I'm thinking of dropping Dead Centre to C as well.
Ghost of Tsushima has been everything Iāve heard and ten fold.
Beautiful game so far and really glad I picked it up.
Highly recommend it. So far Iāve had a great time, and really enjoy the fighting style.
@fleet gulch i got a mod that allows me to set the game resolution high so i can take better pics, now my problem is over
I havenāt tried the online mode much yet, but it looks interesting. I think I played a little into it.
I read that after I sent my message and facepalmed. 
now your gpu is crying
Nice. I havenāt been focusing on the trophies yet, just trying to get through this ginormous campaign.
nah it looks fine, only for a moment to take ss then i set it native
YOU!!!
no
Ayoš
Fr I normally fast travel when Iām boutta log off because Iām getting tired of riding everywhere 
I believe Iām helping track down Tomoe the girl who betrayed her Archer Sensei and sided with the mongols.
Also the side missions are brutal, everytime I try to get to one main mission I end up doing 15-20 side quest
It does, I swear itās like a domino effect.
i set it to 8k and my gpu had a brain rot 
no
go buy your own

wtfffff
KUSO GA THAT IS A 3 FAN
MINE IS DOUBLE FAN
AND IR WAS
$420
i should have waited a LITTLE LONGER
oh that is a deal?
me when turning into keanu reeves

i have this one
Wouldnāt be surprised lol
it will, so you should wait 
40s brings dlss 3, 30s just died
a massive L
to the face
yeah that
looks about the same price
yeah why is the pic like that lol
gonna wait for 3090 prices to drop around $500 then snatch myself one
actually
gonna wait and see how amd goes
if amd got better shit for lower price compared to 40s then im going amd
amd's new gen of cpus already beat the shit out of intel's best cpu in market lol
yeah but fuck them power hungry cpus
same
why is v so, thick.
implants
y'know its funny, cuz its legit the player who has the option to make her thicc so you already know the answer
š

bro
look at her back
v breaking her spine in that pose
ong
weskuh put yer bugs away weskuh
what do you know
v got that big personality implant

samurai by all meanings
cool...
sword
Nice. I wonder when it's gonna release on PC
that sword is so big and round
What you looking at? 
the sword.
Very nice and round sword ngl
that is the sun not the sword
they look the same
what are those jeans called
the sun looks like it exploded in that picture
good question
i need those on my fem V
its rogue's jeans, modded
i want
Bruh
so i can't get v a big personality without mods?
i think this color car doesn't exist in vanilla game, not sure
nope, everything about my character is modded, the jacket, the jeans, the heels, even the body rig, by default it is not shaped like that
@normal crown I made a host of a gank duo block me because I kept parrying his dumbass 
bruh.
i mean at least I can make v look like female keanu reeves
this car looks lit from inside
the cars look so good in the game
man i wish this game had coop
which body rig
would be more fun
so true
hyst's
hyst's rig deform
makes the body shape as close as to realistic
i found it
me when death stranding
forgot to mention even my pose is modded 
josuke's pose my fav
do you have a pic of that in game
nah i replaced my poses
is splatoon 3 any good?
there is no cake

it's just tight pants and realistic body rig š
Ain't gonna wear ugly ass baggy Turkish pants
:GETOUTOFMYHEADGETOUTOFMYHEAD:
DAMNIT
š
you know what they look like? Lol
Yes
I wonder if @vital vector ever wore one of those baggy pants before lol
Which ones?
The Turkish ones
@normal crown one of the bosses in Wo Long Fallen Dynasty
Did you see hideo Kojima in Arasaka tower?
Found some wierd pink pumpkins!
doing all the side missions before I start the last mission.
tryna get fully chromed before bitch slapping adam smasher
This is one of the first missions
With jackie
P much lmao
then nah i missed it
Hes hanging out in the bar talking about the future of the brain dance medium like Kojima would
I find myself staring at the smoke particle fx alot in cyberpunk
same
quick question
w the sandevistian
do u have to be in combat to use it?
because I'm trying to hold e and use it and time just doesn't slow
Not sure, I only have the kerenzikov
It works when hitting dodge button while aiming
Check your keybindings
@queen torrent https://www.reddit.com/r/LowSodiumCyberpunk/comments/t0a84o/i_have_kerenzikov_i_keep_holding_down_e_and/
3 votes and 15 comments so far on Reddit
Might be another implant messing with it
I'm gonna get one soon so I'll figure it out lol
Hacking people is so powerful its almost game breaking lol
But I guess it would be lol. Really hope a sequel makes cyberpyscosis a real risk
kinda felt that hacking was kinda under used
I don't really use it that much
only really use ping to mark enemies.
sandevistian just isn't working
removed all cyberware that slows down time
just doesn't work
I can go through entire main story missions without being seen once just from hacking and no stealth abilities
Alot of times just from a security camera
Contagion is amazing when it's fully upgraded
i'll probs try it out
It can affect a whole crew of enemies with one use
damn
There are perks that increase the amount of times it can jump to people
too bad I put all my attributes so far into body and reflexes
Also detonate grenade
I had one of the weirdest bugs ever yesterday
Suddenly a soda can just appeared above my head
And wouldn't go away
I had to reload the game and it worked fine...but still no idea how it happened
So I went to the afterlife bar and decided to take a screenshot as close as possible to the shot in the anime
Brug
Pretty insane right?
I saw some people doing this on reddit. Apparently basically every location in the anime can be found somewhere ingame and looks the same. I love that they did that really makes the world feels one in the same
Like they could have gotten away with just making similar streets and locations to the game
But the fact that they locations are the SAME down to the last detail
Actually wild
Watch edgerunners
If you enjoy the game, your doing yourself a disservice by not giving it a chance. You don't get a rotten tomatoes rating like this without doing something special
Sometimes things are as good as people say they are, like breaking bad for example
I wish I had listened to people about breaking bad sooner lol
Not having a good experience with Edgerunner fans. 
The first 10 mins bored the hell outta me.
How does that deter you from watching the show?
I don't wish to associate myself with those People. 
I recommended it to my family in 2019....
I'm still the only one of us to have watched it
You're not associated with anyone by just watching the show
That doesn't make amy sense
If you don't wanna be associated with certain people then don't associate with them š¤·āāļø
Every fan base has it's cring
The cring is here though. 
I mean you have a dmc PFP and that fan base gets super cring
Depends I guess.
It doesn't make the games bad
Same with every game/show/movie/etc.
Every community
Fr
I neglected Undertale for a long time because of the fanbase
And after playing it that's when I learned my lesson
Just play games you wanna play or watch things you wanna watch
Don't let how you will be perceived as a fan of that thing deter you from ever giving it a chance
It's just a toxic mindset to be in
Words of wisdom. 
I'll probably watch it at some point, I'm rather bogged down with how many things are going on.
except the jojo community
genshin is getting an anime btw
just gonna add some salt to the wound 
Every anime community: āMY CHARACTER SOLORS STFU!ā
Jojo community: āwhat guy do you think is the hottest?
ā
i know like generalizing a community is wrong
but literally every single soul i know that's a jojo fan is the type of person you
after talking to for 10 seconds
and it has absolutely nothing with the fact that they're jojo fans
it's just like a skill tree in an RPG game, jojo fan - horrible personality traits
The show starts out with a dude in his underwear after he wrecks an rv in the desert....how is that boring!
Its the fact that the audience and critics both agree to that degree that makes it special.
Its almost as bad as that daredevil spinoff that I can't remember the name of becuase it was that shitty
Her super power was suffering from OCD apparently and karate
whats interesting about that anime is how it revived the game
shows u how people's opinion on something can flip entirely depending on what you put inside their heads before consuming it
Weebs are unfortunately the loudest community on the internet. If you get them talking about your game...
You know how many people have copied and pasted that speech? "My name is Walter Hartwell White and I live on 308..."
That bored the hell outta me.
I think people who either decided to not give the game a chance or just bandwagon hated it are finally seeing it for what it is
Because the internet influences people on how they think way more than they like to admit
for me thats not even it, it's how u just know its the same people who were shitting on the game at launch that are now praising the shit out of it, because of a fucking anime
Ironic huh? A triple A game was basically dying into obscurity and an anime brought it back into the spotlight.
the conclusion is really are these type of people reliable to give you a proper review ? absolutely not
which brings us back to the whole try it for yourself and don't take people's word for it
I personally don't like cyberpunk too much, I beat the game (last mission but got bored) and it felt empty. Not to mention I was playing on a last gen console. 
Doesn't excuse CDPR lying to consoles though.
"Runs surprisingly well." 
No that's literally my entire point.
People let the internet completely influence and control how they think so when everyone was calling cyberpunk garbage it was a garbage game. Now that the anime had come out and is almost perfect now it's cool to like cyberpunk and everyone wants to be a fan of the "underrated gem that got an undeserved bad reputation at launch"
But the truth is, even coming from me a day 1 fan of the game despite everything... It's bad reputation was (and still kind of is) 100% deserved.
I dont think I have to re iterate for the 100th time why I consider it to be a masterpiece and why it's one of my favorite games of a time but despite that I'm not blind to it's Bible length list of flaws.
If you donāt like Cyperbunk you donāt like Keanu reeves, and if you donāt like keanue reeves. Than we got a problem 
Yet now people pretend like it is a perfect underrated gem of a game and then I get shit on for pointing out it's flaws even though it's a game I hold very dearly
What in the grammatically proper format fuck is that.
Cp2077's rep was 100% deserved, I agree. But, sending death threats to the devs is a big no no.
People seriously sent death threats over a game?
People just need to learn it's just a game, you don't need to kill people over it.

TLoU part 2.
The actor for Abby got so much hate...
Yeah, donāt remind me. I thought we were over that phase.
Multiple death threats a day.
My apologies.

Yes. To the devs too... As if it's the devs fault the game got released in an unfinished state
I just donāt see from a mental pov how you can send a death threat over a game.
Sure you may be upset, but to go as far as to send a death threat.š
Well, it is somewhat their fault for releasing it in a bad state. But, not entirely they were pressured by stock holders.
"I get shit on for pointing out it's flaws even though it's a game I hold very dearly" if you defended it before the anime came out you'd get called someone with shit taste, if you say anything bad about it now they'll crucify you, it's just the bandwagon mentality a group of "gamers" have 
It's like sending death threats to an actor/voice actor because they play a character you don't like in a piece of fiction
I could understand a heated conversation if you are passionate about a game and someone speaks illy of it. But a death threat, cmon
whats ironic and annoying is the death threats come from the type of person who just wants to ride the hype train of the game, if you actually care about the game and want a good product at the end you won't mind a delay (considering you've been around long enough to know what happens when a game is rushed)
Lmao I can't believe I've put up with this shit for almost two years now.
Literally up until the anime came out defending cyberpunk online was putting a target on my back but I really didn't care as I've always found it to be a game worth defending despite everything.
Truth is I'm just happy people are finally seeing it for what it is. Sure it's not perfect but it deserves the recognition it's getting because it's certainly a game worth playing
YEAH WOO CYBERPUNK 2077 I WANT IT NOW SO IM GONNA SEND DEATH THREATS TO CDPR WHILE PRETENDING I KNEW WHO THEY WERE OR PLAYED ANY OF THEIR PREVIOUS GAMES!!!
Game devs aren't responsible for release dates
then when the game comes out WHY IS IT RUNNING BAD ON MY BASE PS4 AT LAUNCH DAY
But they're responsible for delays? 
Me personally Iāve been disappointed in some games, rarely felt. But still I wouldnāt send a death threat.
It's childish.
No. They just come to work, do their job and get paid like any of the rest of us.
It's the execs who are in charge of PR and marketing including release dates and delays
A death threat over a games state is just sad.
I mean I can possibly see someone with a mental challenge doing so because they canāt control their emotions/actions as well.
But still I think itās childish.
the problem for me has been going around forever, people seem to just never grow the fuck up and learn to have a critical mind, this kind of shit always comes from the type of "gamer" that plays only the stuff that goes viral and is more in it for the sense of belonging than actually playing games and having fun
Well, of course. But when I mean "devs" I mean like the whole company not just the coders and such.
I was disappointed with cyperpunk, and unpopular opinion I didnāt care much for elden ring.
I wouldnāt say it was boring, it was beautifully put and deserved every award. Just didnāt appeal to me is all.
The darksouls vibe is there but just some games donāt click with me if that makes sense.
I got bored personally, I don't like games that just strive to be difficult.
resident evil 6, the order 1886, ac unity, arkham knight, cyberpunk, days gone, list goes on and on when it comes to "hey guys let's all gang up and hate on this game we've never played or even have any experience with the franchise it belongs to because thats the general opinion!"
Plus, I've never understood a Fromsoft story. Other than sekiro
Sekiro was a masterpiece to me.
I liked the challenging boss fights especially the 3-4 phase ones.
I haven't beaten it yet, but it was fun.
10/10 you have to beat it. I recommend the grind to the end.
Yeah. I often have to face a lot of shit because I don't conform to the hivemind.
I have many "hot takes" about so much different shit because I just like the shit I like. I rarely let the internet influence me unless I've done enough research to form an educated opinion about something even if I haven't played or watched it (which I do believe in btw)
But people bandwagon while being very ill-informed. 75% of people who shit on cyberpunk never played it and couldn't explain to me atleast one thing that happens in the story
and then you have those r3tards that try to unironically say you're wrong for going against the general opinion like that's even the point, you're allowed to dislike a game if that's your legit genuine opinion, i however know it's not when shit like this cyberpunk situation happens 
You're all wrong.
refuses to elaborate
Fromsoftware games don't do this. Besides maybe DS2
Pikachu
I think generally a lot of gaming companies release games too soon and with too many micro transactions.
why do i know that the 75% you're talking about are the same type that got hyped over stray as well as RE village ?
and we all know why they got hyped over RE village
I miss the old ways of taking time and releasing a game bug free with no micros needed. And if you wanted to buy anything it was just added content.

Aye resident evil village is a chad game imo.
The older more tactical Ethan?

It's pretty easy to tell. People who genuinely dislike something can explain to you in somewhat detail what they don't like about it. People who just hate because it's trendy tend to not be able to describe why it's bad.
They just say "it's buggy and has a shit story" and then tell you to cope
I have friends on both spectrums and itās fun when they talk about games.
The ones with thorough reasoning behind their dislike of a game, and those who say itās shit stay mad.
thats literally me with my friends over cod, fifa, nba or any of the other major sports games
like they'll say some dumb shit like man this year's game is so bad last year was so much better
like no its fucking not, you're playing a fundamentally indifferent game that's just a reskin of last year's, i know that and i'll still have fun with them but people are either too dumb to realize it or just like being in denial 
Fortnite became the gateway to a new era of a majority acceptance to micro transactions covered in the form of ābattle passes.ā
I remember having these sorts of discussions with star wars.
When the prequels came out they were hated. For good reason too. Objectively they are poor films. (Whether you like them or not as star wars stories is irrelevant as it's completely subjective)
But George Lucas is not a good director, and a lot of the performances in the films turned out to be really bland. The writing is objectively bad and cliche and all 3 movies suffer from serious pacing issues.
My generation however grew up with these movies. I loved them as a kid and so did everyone else. The difference is that I eventually realized that they simply are not that good from a filmmaking perspective but dare I say that online
People are blinded by nostalgia and fuelled by bandwagon praise
Some People are sheep what can I say.
They see others doing it on these streaming platforms and join in.

And targeting younger audiences is a genius move on their end.
I literally can't hate Skyrim because of nostalgia. 
right
I hate that content creators and journalist publications have such an influence on people too.
I literally have a friend that refuses to play anything moist crititical doesn't like
The amount of dopamine that courses through me when I see "Bethesda Softworks" or Todd Howard and his infamous jacket.

Cause Skyrim is actually a good game. I mean it's got it's flaws but it was a generational defining game

your friend is what i like to call the normie "gamer", as in the type of person who'll play those 4 or 5 high profile games of the year and nothing else
Good story, good gameplay, tons of replayability, great exploration, good quests, etc.
Skyrim is actually just good
they're the type of person you can bet your house on what were the games they played that year
It's just buggy and looks like shit because it's a Bethesda game

Bethesda may uhh... Have some ironing to do with bugs.

I'm still fairly hyped for Starfield and TES6 though.
He's a good guy I don't wanna seem like I'm talking shit it's just hell see me playing a game and be like "is that game even good??? Critical said it was trash"
Like I don't give a shit what critical said
Critical doesn't control my wallet
Or my enjoyment with a game
I only trust Angry Joe. 
the problem for me is when these clowns are held in high regard as some of sort of gaming savants
when the majority of them are normies themselves

he used to be outspoken and i was a fan until around the late ps3 era
It's just because he's funny and people like him so they take his opinion as fact
Whereas you should just take his opinion as... Opinion
like i remember 2013 was the year where i started to go like ok bruh whats happened to u
then the next 2 years were the nail in the coffin for me, he became a majority reviewer 
I always respect gameranx's "before you buy" series because even though I literally disagree almost 90% of the time probably, they constantly say things like "mileage may vary" "this is just my opinion" "some players will enjoy this mechanic more than others" "this probably isn't for everyone" etc etc
They are very open about being totally opinionated
They aren't making blanket statements like "this is dogshit don't waste your time"
Even with saints row they iterated what the game was doing right for them
He still somewhat is agreeable with most things.
Meanwhile Charlie just says saints row is dogshit don't play it (which even though is probably true for most people it's not helpful to JUST shit on a game)
Like if you can't say ONE nice thing about a game
You shouldn't be reviewing it
One game I personally HATED was horizon forbidden West but I'm happy to say that the game is fucking gorgeous and the combat is really fun (when it works)
But the story, pacing, and open world design were just not for me
Felt like the game was treating me like a baby
i'm about to say some elitist shit but at this point it's become necessary, with alot of these reviewers you can tell they haven't been around long enough to be even able of formulating an opinion on a game, it's like a food reviewer that goes "i don't like tomatoes so i'm not gonna judge the quality of it on this sandwich", there's some mofos out there that have played 2 or 3 games in their life and expect every other game to be similar to that, it's why the whole "this game is slow" thing is so common and why some idiots will unironically say some shit like ""if a game only gets good after a certain point its bad"", if you want to shoot guns go play a game where you can shoot guns, the fact is if your review is gonna be based off the fact that you weren't interested in anything related to the game then you shouldn't post it in the first place 
thats why it pains me to see him like that, he's one of those guys that know what he's talking about and can spot generic garbage and low effort spots and point it out
he went from "there were a couple of times during the game where...., i had these sections where..." to "the gameplay is just terrible right"
new angry joe to me perfectly represents what's wrong with game reviewers these days, they often times give me the impression of playing through the prologue and maybe an hour or 2 then writing the review
Listening to what people think and then digesting it in your own way is one thing, but no one should ever listen to peopleās takes like the objective truth or smth
I also still like Angry Joe just because of how true to himself he is and how entertaining he makes his reviews
Though I disagree a lot of the time, itās still fine
This also causes a weird sense of entitlement in gaming. People think that companies owe them something when they don't. Game studios are there to make games that they want to make and sell them to people who want them to play it.
You aren't entitled to GTA6 because you are a dedicated GTAO player, you aren't entitled to an easy mode in elden ring because the game isnt "accessible" enough or whatever bullshit, you aren't entitled to ubisoft giving you the old ac format, you aren't entitled to your favorite pvp fps to make the balancing changes you want, you aren't entitled to Fortnite adding your favorite franchise to the game (or the opposite) etc etc so on so forth
Content creators have to abide by certain rules, they cannot speak their minds, be true to themselves. Or just be them. Not to 100%.
What rules
Sadly content creators are run by their audience not themself. And if they overstep or say one wrong thing. Itās done.
Being in the media influence business myself, Iāve learned that you have to avoid certain topics or matters. And have to promote certain things or stray away from.
Yeah that's why I said I'm okay with doing research and coming up with an educated opinion on something wether you've played/watched it or not
That's why I also say you can tell who is who. There's people that have never played say, elden ring, but can come up with a valid excuse to like/dislike it vs people that just hate it based off false pretenses because they have no fucking clue what they are talking about
Common examples: "it's hard just to be hard" "set difficulty is bad game design" "the game isn't accessible enough"etc.
These are all bullshit reasons to dislike the game
It's okay to say "the difficulty isn't for me, the game is too hard and I much prefer simpler games"
Well I know that as a YouTuber I have to follow the YT guidelines. And Iām currently on Techlandās content creator program thing, but that doesnāt stop me from pointing out mistakes or being negative about the game at all.
Well to each their own opinion remember @shrewd sparrow we canāt judge others for viewing games certain ways.
Everyone has their own thoughts on things, and though we may not agree. Itās human nature.
I wouldnāt count social media platform guidelines as rules that people have to follow in regards to ābeing true to themselvesā
Oh if you bandwagon hate a game off of something that's simply untrue I'm gonna judge
Well since you do Yt you understand. @leaden orchid but in America Iāve noticed we have to be careful how we speak sometimes.
Again it's okay to say "the game is too hard for me so I don't like it" it's not okay to say "the game is hard just to be hard and that's bad game design"
We can voice our opinions always of course. But the consequences have proven to be dire from previous examples.
Lol land of the āfreeā
Because it's hard for a very good reason and it doesn't make it bad game design
Elden ring is a very well designed game
Unfortunately our freedoms are slowly being jabbed at, so even talking about our freedom rights being potentially revoked could cause issues lol.
There was an entire podcast talking about difficulty in games, it was very interesting. The podcast itself is about 8 hours long but 4 hours of it was dedicated to that topic
Mostly analyzing and responding to a video that says that people are entitled to easier difficulties
this is what alot of people don't understand, its even more obvious when you consider the amount of times we've known sites like IGN to have paid reviews
I haven't heard that but I've heard like every argument under the sun for both sides of the difficulty argument
also when you see shit like those gameplay demos where you can tell the guy hasn't played more than 1 game in their life, that game being the one shown to you
Well content creators do need money. And what better what than a paid sponsorship to advertise something to their audience.
I understand why they do it. But sometimes you gotta do what you need to keep your business going.
I remember when I had to take down my early impressions video of DL2 because Techland requested it
Again. Entitlement. You don't deserve to be handheld through a game just because YOU choose to "just play games for fun"
It does not matter why YOU choose to play videogames. This game is built to be a challenge for players to take satisfaction in overcoming. If that's not for you that's totally fine. It's very easy to just not play it
And I completely agree you can tell when people havenāt played the game and solely just advertise it. But I understand why.
Not every game is made for everyone
Even though I followed the guidelines and even used other content creator vids as reference to how much I should say.
yeah i don't blame them tbh considering alot of them use that as their main source of income, at the end of the day the community's not ever gonna change 
And I think itās cus I said smth negative, even though I didnāt go into specifics
#censorship
True, all I do is just do me. And I donāt judge others. As long as it doesnāt effect me or my family negatively. I donāt see reason to bother.
@leaden orchid Yah thatās how it is sometimes. You simply speak your mind but sometimes certain people/organizations/groups etc donāt like it and come after you.
Literally nineteen-thousand eighty-four
More so in America itās a bit harsher on our content creators lol.
thats probably because they realize how fragile people are to a purchase, especially when its an AAA game and someone as much as says one negative thing about it these days
I mean I still enjoy being a young thriving content creator. Iām actually working with a member of Twitch whoās mentoring me how to grow.
people act like the games they "like" are perfect
I learned most of my inside knowledge of how to be a content creator/social media influencer from him.
Oh god you just gave me flashbacks to all the times people said "this is literally the next cyberpunk" in #š¬ļø±dying-light-2 pre-launch
It was twice a day atleast
"this is gonna turn out to be cyberpunk all over again"
Whatās funny about it is that I phrased it like āthereās one core thing I donāt like about it, but otherwise Iām really excited to get my hands on the gameā which was true.
And the one thing I was concerned about was the gravity lol
Little did they know DL2 was worse 
Funny how itās not an issue for me on release, it just felt awful on controler maybe
But yeah, when I redid the video I just simply didnāt mention my early impressions of the game and focused on the preview event itself. I was still true to myself there
You were probably fresh off DL1 where crane is way too heavy
Thatās cool atleast. Always gotta be true with yourself I say.
DL1 feels off when I play it now lol
I agree
criticism is absolutely necessary and so is having the mindset as a consumer to accept it and not let it sway you from giving the game a shot, nothing's perfect, people would just rather hear a good first impression to jump on the hype train of a game they know nothing about and thats the sad truth 
You fall way too quickly
Man dl1 and the following was the best. I played that day in and day out.

People seem to be in a mindset that a game is either perfect or garbage which is why I hate the /10 scoring system
Like what's the point of having 10 numbers if we only use 7-10? Why is 7 a dogshit game that's not worth playing? Then what does that make 0?
Why is 5 not a perfectly average videogame? Why is that reserved for 8?
This is why I just use /3
1/3 - bad - fine. Either nothing redeemable or a few good qualities.
2/3 - average - good. Worth checking out but not super amazing
3/3 - reserved for a "life-changing" experience. Not literally, (although sometimes) but just a really great game that changed my outlook or a game that I continuously thought/think about long after playing it
The word "masterpiece" to me is subjective
Oh yes
I hate the scoring system
Where people somehow think 7 is average
5 literally is the middle, it should be average
scores are dumb plain and simple, say what you like about the game and what you don't, give a summary of what the game is about, say how the game does things better than others in the genre, that's how you uplift it and actually give it the equivalent of a number in a review
Don't even get me started on 100% scoring systems
Wtf am I supposed to takeaway from a "63.5% definitely worth checking out??"
If it's worth checking out why is it only slightly above average
What even is "average"
When people want watered down reviews, this is how it is
if a game with college project animations / models / polishing gets an 8/10 you've failed as a reviewer and should quit
Sometimes people just donāt want to spend time reading or watching and only want a score metric to gauge some worth from it
Monetized!!! 
It works for movies and shows
Because there's a ton of objective standards in filmmaking
I tried to wall run, and broke my ankles 
Films can be objectively very bad
Games have a lot more complexity
On what you think objective means
its so dumb in games because of how many genres there are
True objectivity can never be achieved
like how do you justify this system that can give an RTS game a 10/10 and an FPS a 6/10
There's a lot more objective standards in film than videogames
Again, depends on what you mean by āobjectiveā
Absolute objectivity can only be attained by an omniscient being with knowledge of everything
So the common definition rather than the philosophical definition
There's tons of qualities to film that are purely objective
Me fr
We can only be less subjective
I know everything. 
Not objective
There are correct ways to shoot, there is objectively good writing and objectively bad writing there is objectively good scene direction
Gaming has this but it also has GAMEPLAY
And gameplay RARELY has an objective metric tied to it
And what determines such rules that makes things more āgoodā or ābadā?
They will be valued differently and judged differently
Because if you have no idea how to set up a shot or use a camera the shot will look bad because as a society we have a pretty set guideline in what good film looks like
Things are naturally visually appealing and so we try to hit that in cinema
So society determines what is good and bad, a subjective thing
Society!
Basically everyone can agree that having a light source in the shot is better than shooting darkness
for me theres certain things that we can all just agree upon, it's what makes the difference between amateurs and pros, for movies i'm talking about dodgy camera movements, transitioning between scenes, making sure the scene is well lit up....for games it's mostly just animations as well as the presentation, and not breaking that immersion where you start seeing how it's all just a bunch of models moving around in a sandbox
Some would value darkness, itās still subjective
Please find me someone who wants to pay for a movie ticket to watch a film of complete darkness an 0 audio
lol
from the same point of view that you view scientific results off of, it's just the technical stuff that can be objective, when you start talking about anything art related that's when subjectivity becomes a thing
Yes, but itās all still subjective. Instead of talking objective/subjective, itās better to talk about what is widely accepted in society. Because society as a whole is subjective
The new Batman movie? 
That's an objectively bad film because it goes against what we've agreed upon to be good filmmaking
Not when entire paradigms can shift based on new findings. We base our scientific knowledge on how we see things
lol no because at 2:03:46 you can see a faint outline of Batman
We cannot rule that out as an objective impossibility
Thereās a debate we had in music class, where thereās a song called ā3:14ā and itās 3 minutes and 14 seconds of silence
Is that music?
Hmm
An orchestra āplayedā it

That's a good question...
By definition, no
I would consider it art
Not music.
The sound of silence could be viewed as music.
But, it could also be viewed as literally nothing.
Our society and everything we know and value is based on our senses and experiences and since we cannot experience and sense everything we cannot be objective
It's not music per our definition. I would consider it an artistic expression
We can only mutually agree on things as a majority
Which is what I like to call the ācommonā term for objectivity
By definition, I would say no. But, that's because it has no substance, no beat, no song really.
But not āphilosophicalā objectivity
Exactly it's not music
But again I consider it art
Because art is broader
Definitely unique.
I had an entire class that talked about this and I was really interested in it
And silence in the right context can make you feel something
I wanna take it now. 
Since the musicians that played it and some others consider it music it just shows that definitions are interpreted differently
Language and meaning
Etc etc
The deeper you dig the more vague it gets

not really, the point you're trying to make that nothing is objective even in science is fundamentally false when you go down to the roots of it all, there's no "We base our scientific knowledge on how we see things" when it comes to how we need nutrition to live, if we consider water as a technical object that needs to be consumed by the person in order to live (which is objectively a fact regardless of whether you agree with it or not), then the same can be said if we consider shitty camerawork in a movie / shitty audio mixing in a song
They can consider it whatever they want but these words have agreed upon definitions.
I can refer to a fridge as a bicycle it doesn't mean it is
Those two words are clearly defined

What we call a fridge is objectively not a bicycle per our definition of both words
Musical notes can be silent
But I can live in my own little Buble and call shit whatever I want
And a song is composed of musical notes
If a song is composed of just silent notes, then it can be interpreted as a song
I don't really have this free spirit way of thinking. I don't believe in this stuff
i think the answer you're looking for lies in the question of could a deaf person hear music ? (assuming they have no hearing aids), followed by could they hear this 3 minutes and 14 seconds of silence, all of this compared to a person with normal hearing
I don't care much for philosophy that has an easier explanation that's more realistic. It's fun to think about as a thought exercise but philosophy like this won't change my world view
I believe society needs to have definitions and standards
We need to have truth and lies
And wether people agree with said truth or not is up to them on an individual basis
It's not worth losing sleep over (which I'm currently doing)
we do and have ever since the beginning of time, 1 + 1 = 2 and that's not gonna change ever unless you find a purpose or a situation where you have to change it, and you do but you still acknowledge that it's not the real thing 
Rules are literally fundamental to society. Rule of life, rule of language, rule of law. Our species wouldn't be so advanced without these things despite the fact that they pise philosophical conundrums
I think I haven't communicated this properly.
In regards to your water statement, as far as we know, from our history and our biology and our knowledge in chemistry etc etc, that it is vital for our life and longevity. However we only know this based on our research and experience. We will never know for sure if somehow a new discovery or knowledge sometime in the future will lead to us completely changing that fact. It wasn't the water itself, it was something else in it etc etc. That is, even for what I myself think, ridiculous. But since we are not omniscient and don't know everything, we cannot rule that out as a literal impossibility, only an improbability based on our findings.
The exact same thing can be said with camerawork and audio mixing. You and me will consider a higher quality audio file as better (clearer and takes up more file space), but that's due to how we've outlined and determined our own rules based on our experiences, and how we interpret said "rules". The rules are also communicated across in a language that could be interpreted in different mediums and in different translations.
I'm not saying that we can't value anything more or less because we simply don't know everything, I'm just saying we should not call things objective, as true objectivity is simply impossible for us.
Rules, language, and law based on experiences and determined by human beings with each individual thoughts and interpretations of their surroundings
It's like the colour thing.
Red to me may be green to you, and we can never ever know for sure if that will be true or false
Is that the term for the conundrum?
No it's a philosophical and theoretical "razor" that says the simplest explanation is the usually the best
In this case: If it's simpler to accept the definition out species has come to mostly agree upon them we should just accept it
I do like the thought exercise though
It reminds me of old vsauce videos
That man used to raw dog 13 year old me---
At the end of the day all of this was because I'm being pedantic about the use of the word objectivity, so I apologise if I wasted your time
He used to blow my mind
Vsauce is great, I also like to watch other channels like Veratisium
Though that is far less philosophical
I don't mind it I appreciate the philosophy
It's just for me it's easier to just accept that most people would probably prefer what we consider "good" cinema over what we consider "bad" Cinema
And that it's not so night and day with games
Even WITH definitions
And I agree myself, it allows a frame of reference that (almost) everyone can agree upon
Because you aren't just a passive viewer but an active player
Otherwise if we're being too abstract then we cannot converse things
I also personally think videogames themselves are too new of an art form for us to even try to fully define
Video games are a lot more complicated just because they're an interactive media
It's really difficult to accurately pinpoint why "good" games work but why "good" games can be hated by so many people
And that adds a whole nother thick layer to things
Yeah because even though people can mostly agree on what makes "good" mechanics and what "good" gameplay can look like but almost no one can agree totally
Like how can a game like Fortnite exist
Being so publicly disliked (both for the meme and not) but also be one of the most played games in the world for 5 consecutive years
I can't think of any movies with this heavy of a contrast off the top of my head
Besides maybe movies that critics loved but audiences hated
But that's not even the same either
Fortnite benefits from multiple things:
- Free to play
- Battle Royale (during the time it was very popular)
- Tons of other gamemodes (like creative)
- Both PvP and PvE, catering to greater audience
- The promotional crossovers (skins like Chief and Kratos lol)
- Child friendly (no swearing / blood / simplistic art style that matches a lot of cartoons that parents would relate to and allow their kids to play)
I'm so hyped for those melee creative tools
Can't wait to play dark souls in Fortnite
That's what got Roblox really popular more recently right?
I forgot to address this. I'm not entirely sure what I would consider it tbh, I only know of this song because of music class, and we opened dialogue about it for like the first half an hour of it.
Funnily enough it doesn't fit the first definition but it fits the second one
But then again it's still debated by musicians
Because you can argue that lack of sound contributes to music, but only contextually
When contextually used WITH sound, it can be considered music perhaps?
However an entire piece that has absolutely zero sound can not be considered
Yeah, in that context it's used in tandem with sound
Also I'm wrong it's not 3:16, it's 4:33
Subscribe and š to the BBC š https://bit.ly/BBCYouTubeSub
Watch the BBC first on iPlayer š https://bbc.in/iPlayer-Home http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcfourcollections 4'33" by John Cage performed by The BBC Symphony Orchestra conducted by Lawrence Foster live at the Barbican.
This programme is included in the BBC Four archive collection of Modern Cla...
The host talks about how it's all about the sound of silence and the small things that people hear around them
So it's a different experience each time
Well even if it's music it's atleast not a song then
I personally still wouldnt call it music
I'd call it art.
Just art
That feels more apt to me
Actually that makes me think
Because it's less about the audio more about the experience
What kind of art form is it?
Art makes you feel
Because all music is art but we call it music, we have visual art like paintings etc, and dramatic arts in acting
Just art. Art can be formless
What would that be considered?
Art can be uneven sidewalk lines or misprinted coins
True
It just makes you feel something
I remember the discussion of this in my philosophy class one time, where there was the example where someone took of his glasses and put them on the floor in a museum exhibition. All of a sudden people thought it was part of the exhibition and began taking pictures of it.
It makes you wonder how something can be considered art because of the institution
And the context it's in
Rather than it's existence itself
And I'd argue that this silent "song" isn't music because music is generally orchestral. You hear it and the emotion comes from the audio I think this silent "song" is more about the experience and feeling as a whole not just the silence itself
Especially since you mentioned it's about just being there in the moment and taking in the surroundings
Causing it technically to be a different "song" each time
Oh no Jackson Pollock
Bros a genius
Put a diarrhea poo stain on a canvas and let rich assholes pay millions for it
They aren't even doing it cause it's art they just think it gives them status
Which I guess is actually technically part of the art itself
Reminds me of Ex Machina when they talk about it in a scene
Maybe the idea that rich idiots will pay so much for something so worthless IS the art itself and Jackson Pollock is actually a GENIUS
For the first point, the thing is we already know what's in it that we need, the transformations that happen inside of our body that can be expressed with chemical reactions tell us exactly how they happen and why they happen in such a manner which is what makes it objective, there's absolutely nothing that can change it in the future and make it subjective, to give you another example we know for a fact that certain chromosomal abnormalities ALWAYS lead to certain deficiencies (either mental or physical), down syndrome for example being a result of having a third copy of 21, the only possibility that this wouldn't be an objective fact is if you were discussing another species that does not suffer from these same results.
"You and me will consider a higher quality audio file as better (clearer and takes up more file space), but that's due to how we've outlined and determined our own rules based on our experiences, and how we interpret said "rules", the point i was trying to make is there's a certain level / threshold where you can talk about objectivity even in art and that's the extremely shitty level, if someone sent you an audio file of earrape and called it a song or showed you a video that was very poorly shot (you can't see or hear shit basically and it's a pointless waste of a good camera) and called it a movie then you can just freely objectively say that it's nothing but a shitpost, the reason being that it doesn't even achieve what it was advertised as, if you acknowledge that music and film has an objective definition then i'm sure you'll also acknowledge that said definition has to be conformed to atleast on a certain level (i'm excluding the situations where the director purposely uses unfamiliar angles or sounds to create certain vibes / feelings for the viewer)
as a followup, what i'm saying is no matter how subjective the end result and the final product can be, you can always trace it back and weigh it with certain objective standards, simply put you can't make anything if you don't have a basis to start with, and you can't improve if you have nothing to compare your work with.
Government shouldn't have been collecting taxes in the first place š¤·āāļø
Certified boy lover
We don't need half the shit taxes go towards. And what we do need isn't even being accomplished by taxes
Instead of maybe just removing funds from police departments and giving them to schools how about we re allocate the funds to allow for better trained police officers and more competent school boards
Same here. There's 4 inch deep potholes in the roads
What if a film writer director wanted to go out there and make a romance film, but the finished product only has platonic relationships and is instead considered one of the best dramatical thrillers in film history. He failed to do what he wanted to do, but it's still considered successful and "good" <- At least in regards to how we value filmmaking. I don't think intent and advertisement has anything to do with it.
"if you acknowledge that music and film has an objective definition" I do not, as I don't see it as an objective definition. It's a definition based on words formulated in a pattern that we interpret, all of which is made up by us humans as language.
In regards to the first point, we know this much about water, but we fundamentally do not know if there is more to learn, so we cannot universally say for sure.
PhilosopherGG
Standards that aren't objective because we base standards on our experiences and knowledge and our subjective thoughts
I mean isn't that why people try to devalue other people's opinions by saying "you have poor standards"
Fr
That's what I'm saying. Everyone wants to just take away funds from the police I'm saying we should just re allocate how those funds are being used. Put it towards better training and such.
Same with schools. In highschool my school was rich as hell but would just buy new TV's and gym equipment and shit. Whereas they could use those funds to better train the teachers
But as a human being I would almost certainly agree with you on the majority of things when considering what is good or bad, it's just not objective. It's just you and my subjective takes on things @charred gust
There's fucking dubstep genres out there which is literally earrape and people enjoy it
Bass boosting is a common thing, to which some people may take it to extremes and still unironically enjoy it
Teachers are criminally underappreciated. They teach kids that hate them, literally disrespect them. All after getting a teaching license. Where I am, you can teach college without a degree, but not high school. It's weird, schooling needs some amendments.
I'd come into the cafeteria in the morning and see 4 new TV's playing a slideshow of pictures of the school and then go to first period social studies and study with a textbook that looks like It personally lived through the fall of Rome to teach me about it
I agree, teachers are greatly underappreciated as a lot of young people's successes can be thanks to them
Yet a lot of times they're underpaid and deal with shitty students
Teachers basically can't win. If they are "chill" and laid back they are "lazy" and "not doing their job" if they are passionate and serious they are "too strict" and "mean"
I will say though, I have had a fair share of teachers that just didn't want to teach. So, they didn't. I learned little my sophomore year.
There's a balance, it's rather hard to find though.
Being chill, but still making work get done is a good standard to go for.
The education system is just fundamentally flawed in it's current state.
Even if a teacher is great at teaching the material and is able to make most people WANT to learn there will still always be kids that don't give a shit and then blame the teacher
True
Full-time mandatory education is goofy after 8th grade
On another thing, there is 1 janitor in my school. One.
It should be part time and half the year
My middle school years were ASS


My physics teacher took my brother's class on a skydiving trip
My criminal justice teacher took me to a jail. 
He was in his first year teaching at our school so he didn't do anything extreme, but by the time he was teaching my younger brother he did that
You live in a country with a good education system
Spain
My chemistry teacher also was a Warhammer & miniature fan and he took some to school one day to show them off

Now I'm sad... My history teacher was a gamer man, he was badass. He got fired I think. He always talked about a teaching degree or something.
He had a cool nickname too "Thor". 

Good
middle and high school teachers are criminally underpaid btw
Did you visit Alpvia?
Legit looks like a sekiro boss
Lmfao
Funnily enough I stayed in someone's house whose name was Alper
Discord rather slow today...
@vital vector
It wasn't Alp lol he was around my age, but it's a funny coincidence
This was back in like 2015 when I was 17 ish
Alpguy
ooo
Mexican food.
Try the jamon iberico or iberian ham
Chimichangas are amazing bro.
Dude, I learned about that in my Spanish class. 
It sounds so familiar.

US Mexican is very different to Mexican Mexican
@stark oyster you never should've out ur server in ur bio 
But you won't get that in Spain
Oh shit
It's fucking expensive bro
Even a plate can be like 30+
The shitty store bought stuff is still expensive as well
How good is it?
Fucking amazing
10/10?
Though tbh, it doesn't blend well with other stuff, I like to have it either on its own or on toast w/ manchego cheese
@normal crown Where in spain are you going
Ah
Nah that's a big generalization
I don't feel like it is, the food in Mexico is of course going to be more regional. The U.S. version is going to try and adapt to that palate more.
It's just like UK Indian vs actual Indian, every Indian I've talked to has told me that Indian food in the UK is so different
And my mum was thoroughly disappointed when she went to Mexico and found out that the Mexican food there was so different lol
As someone who grew up in the US eating US Mexican food
Barca is cool, never been there myself tho
I've had authentic Mexican Mexican food
Here in the US
Paris is a shithole tbh

Good luck trying to get up the eiffel tower with 50k people in a line in front of you
As well as the French people in Paris are so rude
I've had Mexican food here in the US with 1st gen Mexican immigrants who recommended it to me
screw canadian French ppl!!!
Fr!!!
they are assholes!!!
Lucky, I guess it's all about what restaurant you go to. But if you compare typical Mexican food in the US to typical food in Mexico it's vastly different
I found the horse game in Cyberpunk
French Canadians are unironically racist
Roach.
šæ
VERY. My friend who's Canadian says the N-word like there's no tomorrow. 
whut
oh.
When I was in Sydney I was living with Asian room mates, and they took me to authentic Asian restaurants there where I was literally the only non Asian person there
The food was fucking fantastic tho
It was in California. Had a friend who's parents immigrated to America while the mother was pregnant with the first kid so he would be an American citizen and have American birthrights
AsianGG
Unrelated but it's awful to think about that struggle
Good, that's better at least
That I've never had. Any authentic Asian food
I think that's why a lot of countries have that outlawed now right? Giving birth in a country doesn't make that person a citizen. It's why I'm not a citizen of the UK despite being born there, since they stopped doing that in like 86
I've never had any authentic food.
Panda Express still slaps tho idc HOW we Americans botched the shit out of their good cuisine
It's all been synthetic.
How?$?!!?!??!?!
Some of the stuff on the menu was... interesting.
It tastes like plastic, is it not authentic??
It's still a thing in the U.S. You are a citizen if you were born here
I had the conservative stuff lol
Deets?
wtf are deets
DEETS NUTS
Oh wtf, interesting

Fr lmao
You even get special "birth"rights that aren't afforded to immigrants

nah but seriously what were the menu items?
I'm genuinely proud of that deez nuts joke. 
Lots of weird seafood stuff, and there was something like frog there too
You should be. 
I had quail eggs there and I was surprised as to how fucking amazing they were


Squid
Ew
Escargot I think.
escargot
I never liked seafood outside of tuna and sometimes prawn and fish if prepared with tons of batter or in a spring roll
escargot

You like salmon?
I had crab once, it was way too much effort.
Damn crab is built like a tank.
Salmon is good, if it is cooked correctly.
I don't like seafood but I really don't think I've ever had GOOD seafood
Salmon when my mum prepares it, drenched in soy and teriyaki sauce lol
Also boys... #šÆļø±other-games moment
That sounds amazing.
I just came here to say something about Cyberpunk.

From other games to food chat. 
Change channel name to Otherfood when
There was an entire philosophical arc between
Exactly, it's weird. 
My dad ate sea urchin one time to show how in touch he is with his Maori heritage (they eat it a lot). He never ate it before and it was horrible for him lmao
I guess it's sorta like surstromming for swedes

What do they taste like anyways?
Sea urchin is apparently like sweet.
I don't know I would never even try one lol
Interesting
Sea urchin is nasty asf.
It is.
Go grab one and eat it
I would probably try one. Once.

I'd try it though. 
That's how they cook it, yes.
It's like lobster, or crab. When it's dead it rots quickly.
Just like you
Not yet...
Not yet


Perpetually stinky.
Anyways, I've never had lobster or crab for the 19 years I've been alive
Ok I'm going back to work
See ya
Same.
My mouf hurt.
uff
I got orang juce 
uff

You have issues man
what does that mean, Crex?
What?
Ain't spicy enough unless you can't taste anything except your taste buds being boiled.
Facts.

I would literally die to death if I had to eat something that spicy people consider spicy.
Need? YOU NEED DEEZ NUTS!!!!
Thank you. 

we still talkin about that troll song?
because a song without any sound at all in it, isnt music by definition lol
it is a great troll move though
the ultimate smart ass creation in music
i had alot of debates with people in the industrial music chatroom on this file sharing program called soulseek that im not sure is even still around today
merzbrow for instance, is one of the biggest artists in the "noise" genre
https://youtu.be/fR_8gpJCT4I it might be hard to believe, but this isnt a joke. this dude is VERY serious about his....art
ā FOR AUDIO: http://bit.ly/1smBQN1
ā SUBSCRIBE TO BOILER ROOM: http://bit.ly/1bkrHWL
One of the most prolific artists of his kind. Armed with homemade instruments, some contact mics and a desk-load of effects pedals, Merzbow went about destroying the Dommune studio.
ā FOLLOW US HERE FOR MORE FUN:
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/boilerr...
share how long you were able to listen to it!
wow look it's the boiler room.

so exciting
wait
are they IN a boiler room? or is it just the group name.
Bofa?
oh no
did I get tricked into something?

the band name is "merzbow"
one of the biggest names in the "noise" genre
its some club in tokyo
oh.
this is a live performance of his.....music
which in my opinion, is the opposite of music
Now
it has no rythm, no coherence, no melody, its literally the same noise if you hooked a mic up to an old tv playing static
but they try to claim its music
art can be any type of personal expression, but music is a specific type of art, therefor the excuse "its art" cant be used to claim its music. you can claim its art, but you cant use that excuse to also say its music
Yes, but try telling that to a legitimate fan of the music
Heya guys
what other games are ya playing?
Description
Made by Hotbite https://www.nexusmods.com/eldenring/mods/2306
Feel free to leave any suggestions for Hotbite as this is more of a BETA version of the mod, you can join our discord if you want to talk to Hotbite directly or if you have a question for me specifically Discord https://discord.gg/VERzNbczqh
SUPPORT:
Help me exist: ht...
@normal crown we can fight Malenia the way it's intended now

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LsaOCkQjVBg these guys will make bloodborne inside of elden ring before you know it
Learn more about the team, the plans and updates of the biggest Elden Ring overhaul mod: The Garden of Eyes!
āŗ DOWNLOAD AND PLAY THE MOD NOW!
https://www.patreon.com/GardenOfEyes
āŗ Check out the other team members:
⢠Pear: https://sites.google.com/view/theonlypear
⢠The Roaring Forge: https://www.patreon.com/theroaringforge
⢠MaxTheMiracle: ht...
It's kinda like
Pseudo Bloodborne LOTR
There's a trick weapon but it's.. okay.
I'm waiting for the more proper trick weapons if possible
Thinking how early the mod is, and that 90% of it so far was made by only 1 guy, imagine what the team could do
I do have faith in the team. A lot of impressive stuff
The modding scene in general has evolved rapidly
We'll see how long it takes before we get modded bosses with their own movesets
I might get it when my PC comes in
After trying other mods with Riz
Garden of Eyes is on his Patreon, isn't it?
iirc, at least
yeah
What's your favorite weapon from it?
so far, serosh claws that turn me into HOARAH LOUX, WARRIOR


We throw eachother around 
Or you bully human sized enemies using it with the homies
Good
how I wanna deal with my parents rn
ayo what
what
š
Straight from 2010
Probably even earlier
OFF WITH YOUR HEAD
"ayo, vibe check"
Lesgo š³

Flawless pistol
Cyberpunk 2077! Flawless game.

It's a fun game but have some bugs still kinda esh
Imagine Cyberpunk had co-op
The fact that the dude is hitting headshots









