#politics
1 messages · Page 77 of 1
I mean, maybe that's the nessasary evil to get a green traffic and environment minister
And agriculture
Urg, so many important things, lol
SPD can get the work ministry and foreign ministry, they did fine work there
It will take months to get everything sorted, lmao
But as long as the CDU is opposition it's a win I guess
They all say they want it done before the end of the year
It's still possible CDU is in charge though, right?
,es
Yes*
Sadly
Both Jamaica and traffic light is equally possible I guess
Greens prefer SPD, FDP prefers CDU
1,370 votes and 129 comments so far on Reddit
The power shortages are a mixture of environment restrictions, a natural gas shortage apparently everywhere in the world except the US, and them not having enough of the kind of coal they can use to cover the difference
Getting rid of that first one or taking in coal from Australia would certainly help but it's the natural gas shortage messing things up the most
yeah, and now that I think about it, it does sound like a pro-coal lobby kinda thing
They have coal (although apparently they're having their own internal shortages too) just not the kind they're allowed to use for some of this stuff
US is producing more than enough natural gas but with the rest of the world wanting it we're exporting more so prices are rising here too
Wells aren't upping production because they make more money doing nothing right now and are worried they'll either kill the market or invest a bunch to do so and then have the market stabilize and have their next quarter look bad
Or potentially put them out of business if they invest too heavily
O boy
Oh yeah we're fucked
This country deserves judgement for the way it voted in 2020. The impending shutdown is a righteous act.
That's enough /r/conservative for today
“I only lost my sense of smell.” that’s your nervous system right there, my guy. thats your brain.
15519
134287
I wish the democrats had nominated a younger person. I get the destinct feeling that Biden can not handle high stress tasks at his age.
Like, I feel like people voted Biden only to spite Trump.
Trump is 75
I think Biden is less there than trump. Stuff like this doesn’t happen at the same age for everyone. Could have an 85 year old more “there” than a 75 year old
Have you ever watched one of Trump's rallies all the way through?
Trump is more energetic but they both have some problems there
Yes, Trump was going to be nominated off the bat for the republicans. I just mean that Biden seems consistantly unfit to be in the position he is in. If a younger democrat had been put in, it wouldn't be an issue.
Surely they are not at the same point, though. I highly doubt what he comes out of his mouth ever comes from a script. They are both too old though.
oh yeah, you're getting no argument from me that Trump is also too old, but part of Trumps speaking style is, well, how he talks, and riffs about things. Biden has been gaff-prone in the past, but its def gotten more significant in recent years/months.
I hope neither of them run in 2024
well politicians in general, isnt the average age in the senate like high 60s?
then you've got diane feinstein whos gonna run again
the requirement for president to be at least 35 years old should be lowered to 18 (basically coincide with age of majority)
i mean, as long as you're an adult... why can't you run for presidency?
it could perhaps lead to younger people trying to run instead of always having to choose between boomers
if it shouldn't exist anymore, why should it have existed in the first place?
I personally ask the same thing
if anything, to keep up with longer average lifespans it should be later
perhaps it's just my general distaste in having too old people holding political positions then
was certainly one of the reasons i voted for him lol
i don't personally mind if our politicians are older or not
i mean as a young person i guess it'd be more relatable if they're younger but it's not make or break
not sure about the US but what I've learned in europe's case is that if you survived your early infancy then you could basically leave up to 70s
but still
Yeah people weren't dying at 30 or 40 all that often
If you made it to adulthood you could make it to 70 even in like 1200 AD
Before that we don't have good records
Presumably if you could in 1200 AD though you could back to like 0 AD too
I mean yea i can see the argument against it, i totally get it
Of course those records are only for nobles (bloodlines and all that) so maybe peasants were dropping dead at 40
it's just not something that's a huge deal for me :p
yeah and older people tend to be less in touch with the current world... maybe it's different for those who have to deal with politics in a more "direct" way?, but whenever i see old people discussing politics, with extremely conservative views, that's the view i get
you don't necessarily need a 20 year old president to change the world though lmao when i mentioned the age requirement it was just because I had remembered of it and i find it pretty arbitrary
but
younger people in politics helps imo
probably from having their heads cut off by the landlord for not paying the windmill tax
"anti-vaxxer clown" is just a strange combination but endlessly hilarious https://www.sorryantivaxxer.com/post/denise-truffles-lyonnais-68-the-villiages-fl-anti-vaxxer-clown-dies-from-covid
Well, we just lost Truffles aka Denise Lyonnais to COVID according to this post. She lived in the Florida retirement community "The Villages" and entertained gatherings and parties as the Clown "Truffles." However, she was an anti-vaxxer and none of her posts on Facebook were funny... until now. Let's see Truffles comments It's really not that f...
I think we've talked about the viability of nuclear before, this post has some interesting figures https://whatisnuclear.com/blog/2020-10-28-nuclear-energy-is-longterm-sustainable.html
Oh look the graph is even in the pullout
Feasible and economical with current technology and political acceptance their projection is nuclear would be able to provide 100% of our energy needs (not just electricity, heating and transportation and etc too) for about 5.7 years
Saltwater uranium extraction would get a lot more time but isn't economical with normal reactors (and still might not be with breeder reactors yet)
Breeder reactors would also get us a lot more time but aren't politically acceptable (they create bomb material)
We could dump a bunch of subsidies into nuclear to get our CO2 emissions down as a stopgap but since they take so long to build I'm not sure if there would be a point
And those subsidies would probably be better spent upgrading the electrical grid or installing heat pumps in every home or something
Nuclear is cool and all, but we have this problem: what do you do with the waste?
you burn it up
what you can't use, you seal up and store
nuclear would do a good job of getting base loads off of the network, those are primarily the big natural gas generators and the coal plants which still exist here and there
little fun fact, did you know that if a nuclear plant was to emit as much radiation as a coal plant does, it would be shut down?
That's the problem tho
We don't know how to do that
There are many plans which people are looking into
At least not in a way where you can be certain a future government can't go like, science isn't real, I'll stop paying for storage
There are even potential solutions to basically destroy most of the long life stuff too
which is why projects which bury it are an especially interesting solution if done properly
I mean, we're already burying what would be considered nuclear waste indiscriminatly into coal mines and such
We tried burying it in a salt mine but then water entered 🤡
I mean, the alternatives I've seen are generally 'use heavily polluting machinery to mine all of the rare metals we need for batteries", if which grid capacity is a fair ways away
There are defo still questions about nuclear, don't get me wrong, but, what's the alternative?
For storage much better things exist
E.g, Germany sends their excess to Norway and they pump water round
And you can do the hydrogen thing
Which, yes, is wasteful, but ok to do with excess
efficiency is a critical factor when it comes to storage
and last I knew they weren't exactly at capacity with that yet
Not when energy is free
We've also got this fun thing where we're gonna need a whole lot more hydrogen in the future for stuff like aviation
it's not free
If you got excess because both sun is shining and wind is blowing, you don't care about how efficient hydrogen production is, you just wanna use up that energy
I mean, yea, better to store it than to waste it on grid balancing, but, if we're gonna get to having days of storage capacity, efficiency is gonna be critical
We also need more global energy networks
So you can more easily balance weather effects
which is also only gonna take years, upon years, upon years to develop and get into place
The waste problem for nuclear is, imho, not as big of an issue as if we don't start actually moving, many countries have been letting their reactors dwindle
UK literally had/has a coal plant running
Well, the problem isn't going away magically if we ignore it
Couldn’t we also power the entire world with a good number of solar panels in the Sahara (assuming everybody gets along)? I remember watching a video on that year ago.
That's what I was hinting at with more global power grids
Pretty sure they would have to cover at least 2/3 of the Sahara
It’s nearly 8billipn solar panels just to power America alone
Nuclear waste is only a minor issue if we're using breeder reactors, they turn up most of the fuel and their waste products aren't as long term dangerous
Problem is they also make plutonium-239 afaik
They don't make enough of it. That's the problem.
I mean, it's still an issue we have to think about but only for like a hundred years instead of 10,000
Thorium never took off, because it couldn't be used for weapons at the time.
Thorium is also a damn hard engineering problem
Especially the molten salt version everyone is always jerking off over
True that.
I can't be the only one who got like 15 recommendations on my google news panel about the experiments at the NIF in LIvermore right?
Always just 50 years away.
I'll get back to you on that, but as I remember, that number is actually much lower because of efficiency in the Sahara is much higher on average then anywhere else on earth.
Issue with the Sahara is that we don't know what the side effects will be
side effects meaning environmental effects, or shifts in political power?
Because if we are talking about the real world, there will not be a universal grid (especially with the Sahara at the center) because it forces other countries to give up power
Yep, the NIF is just one example of a experimental nuclear fusion reactor that can actually produce power. They use inertial confinement. In the last couple years venture capitol companies have been investing billions of dollars into fusion tech actually.
environmental effects, who knows how taking over huge swathes of land of the sahara is
ITER is another interesting one, there are like 23 countries involved in experiments in the ITER project.
Then theres also actually the infra needed behind it, e.g. getting resources like water there so that you can keep the panels clean (as otherwise they're useless)
Then theres the technological aspects of it, the grid was never designed to have a major source of power generation come from one place
They also have to mine the materials for it, build the panels, mine more materials for replacement panels, etc. Most of the worlds power usage is commercial anyway.
Commercial/industrial.
Solar if it were able to have 100% uptime would only be a stopgap solution.
for power gen in the sahara solar panels directly probs would even make sense, tbqh
wouldn't*
In what way?
typical challenge of solar, peak usage goes up as the sun starts going down, especially in winter
(and with the plans to get rid of natural gas usage, that's only gonna get worse)
The molten salt mirror setup would probably be better
I decided to follow my city on Twitter for election news, and now I see them posting almost weekly about building new bike lanes, lol
Today it was 6 to 4 car lanes on a street that goes thru the northern half of the city
I knew my city was big on that, but the pace is really cool to witness
And like, this only costs 300k
Plus another 200k for rebuilding a few traffic lights, who were old anyways and get the LED treatment now, together with the needed changes for the bike lanes
So there is really no excuse to not make your city more bike friendly
you mean your taxes actually get used to build things?
Yeah, funny what electing a green progressive city government does to your city
@near glen I support more bike friendly roads, hell, anywhere really
NL is years ahead of you B)
Sadly, ye
The difference is unreal
But people here always say it always has been that way in the NL and there's more demand there and stuff
When that's bullshit, as shown by Paris for example, which is getting transformed big time right now
Get rid of cars and suddenly you got cyclers and pedestrians everywhere
so, CDU is a conservative party in germany?
that's funny to me because here in portugal the CDU is a coalition between two left parties

the Portuguese Communist Party and "The Greens" Ecologist Party
got my first COVID-19 shot yesterday, so now i'm in the majority group of americans, yay
ikr, here everyone is "green progressive" here until after elections
funny how that works
yes, CDU is a conservative party in Germany, with their affiliate in Bavaria, the CSU (Christian Social Union)
you ask me why they have two names
idk
Only three ways this goes:
- Republicans will keep this charade until October 18th, and then blink. The good outcome.
- Republicans and Democrats reach an agreement that involves torching the Biden agenda. Unlikely, but Manchin and Sinema might just jump on board this crazy train.
- Republicans allow the default to happen and blame it on Democrats, even though Democrats were more than happy to vote by themselves to raise the debt ceiling. Eventually the impasse is resolved but Republicans will suffer no consequences while Democrats will suffer all the consequences. I see this, unfortunately, as a fairly likely outcome.
- Democrats get fed up and on October 18, manage to convince Sinema and Manchin to blow up the filibuster for debt limit increases and voting rights. Unlikely, but would resolve the impasse. The best outcome.
The most unlikely outcome is 5. Abolish the debt limit since it's been nothing more than a political football to throw around, and hasn't been a meaningful limit on the country's public debt in the longest time.
If we go even close to October 18 without resolving this shit is going to be bad
Pelosi already said they're going to vote on the smaller infrastructure bill today, iirc
But remember, the last time this happened, the U.S.'s credit rating got downgraded and Republicans extracted painful austerity measures from the Democrats. That could happen again, which is why I think (2) is likely.
But the bigger bill was also the budget bill so... still getting a normal kind of shutdown from that dying
nah, shutdown prob wont happen senate just today passed the CR till early december
We won't get a shutdown, Democrats and Republicans agreed to pass a clean continuing resolution with funds for hurricane relief and Afghanistan refugees.
ya, thats what I saw
Did it include anything for the debt ceiling or just a budget?
Nothing for debt ceiling.
no not a budget
It's kind of a budget
its a CR which means its like an agreement to not do anything for a little while longer
Continuing resolution means there is no budget, it's just continuing the last budget's spending.
yeah
Anyway, without a debt ceiling increase or suspension it doesn't really matter since on the 18th there won't be enough money to fund it
It'll keep things mostly moving until the 18th though
We should be reducing spending really, Id love to see us start pulling payments out of places that take millions, along with removing pet projects from the budget
In order of likeliness, I say (1), then (2), then (4) or (3)
(5) is never going to happen
I think if we don't get something done with the debt ceiling this week we're getting a rating downgrade anyway
poggers lets ruin the global economy poggers
Democrats will have one hell of a messaging operation to run if Republicans decide to not raise the debt ceiling.
Now the moderates are talking about going back through all the stuff in the big bill and modifying it to be means tested
pain
I think manchin just said again today that 1.5 is the highest he'll go
Which is another way of saying "we want bigger government to help less people"
I love how "moderate" Democrats and Republicans generally agree on this one principle.
In that sense they are both extremists.
Manchin is trying to pretend there was never a deal for him to support the bigger bill in exchange for the progressives supporting the smaller one he wanted to show you could still work with Republicans
So I don't know if I'd trust him saying now that he gave them details on what he would support months ago
Also, it's not really $3.5 trillion in one go. It's more like $350 billion over 10 years.
He has been spending the last couple days trying to pretend none of the plans that have been going on this summer were a thing
I'm not sure what happens from here, Manchin and Sinema have to blink at some point unless they don't want their jobs. And judging from Sinema's approval ratings, she's now more popular amongst Republicans than with Democrats.
Does Sinema want to get primaried?
He is trying to say his understanding is that they'd pass the smaller bill and then start talking about if there should be a bigger bill and what should be in it
She's practically asking to get primaried.
I wonder if the progressives in the house are going to give in on the smaller bill or not
They've said they aren't going to vote for it unless the other one passes first and without them the bill wouldn't pass
Unless a lot of Republicans voted for it too
For all intents and purposes, the Senate is effectively controlled by Republicans. It's a surreal situation given that I lived in a state that not only gave Biden crucial electoral votes but also his theoretical Senate majority. At least the senators we elected are reasonable - Ossoff is more moderate, Warnock has chosen to be quite progressive.
It was a helluva lot better than the sixth cousin of the Perdue family and Kelly Loeffler, who used her inside information to sell stocks just as COVID was ramping up and Trump was denying that anything was wrong, and wanted to tie herself to Trump in every possible way.
She even lost her WNBA team.
New: Manchin told me “that won’t happen” when asked about Pelosi saying there needs to be deal on “legislative language” with WH on reconciliaton to get progressives to support infrastructure tomorrow
“No one has been negotiating along those lines with the other parties here” https://t.co/Aabgu0kbut
295
601
Anyway! Rumor has it that I have work to do today
Don't worry, am a politically interested German and I couldn't tell you why the CSU exists
Rep Cuellar (D - Texas) is on MSNBC and a few minutes ago said he didn't know of any deal to pass both bills together but then just now explained the deal
But he is saying the agreement was just that the progressives would vote for the smaller bill, no tie between the two or order they have to pass
So he is telling progressives "you agreed to pass this on the 27th, we're a few days late but you need to vote yes on this today like you agreed"
NPR was happy to describe it today as the democrat's job to fix, even though republicans will fillibuster it, it's somehow the democrats set up to fail on the debt limit.
If they had started a month ago (or a week or two maybe if they really rushed things) they could have done it as a part of the budget
Lmao, the greens already break away from their promises
They no longer want a 130kmh speed limit
Only took, checks watch, 5 days, to throw away their principles
Next you know they start to believe in the market too
(context, German election, greens and neo liberals are discussion their common ground right now before they wanna see whom they form a coalition with)
New record?
to be fair, there are more important topics than that and I'd rather have them focus on those instead of the speed limit, which is mostly PR if I'm being honest
It's one of the things I expected and hoped they would drop, so that other points can stay
Fair enough
Still would have a direct (good) impact on my daily life
Cause idiots going at 200+ kmh is the most annoying thing on the Autobahn, together with trucks on the middle lane and idiots driving on the middle lane when right lane is empty
are there more important things? sure
is it worrying that parties are willing to throw away their principles to cozy up for power rather than actually fighting for their convictions? You can be the judge of that
I generally think it depends on the reason they're giving up on it. If it's because they can't get all of what they want through due to numbers, then maybe. Ideally it would warrant an apology accompanying an explanation on how they screwed up, as well as their new plan which would leave them in my eyes liars or ineffective if they couldn't accomplish the new plan - which is just about every politician ever at some stage in their careers. Though people only ever want to hold them accountable when they disagree with their projected position, probably part of the problem.
Lol
"I’m sure pay and conditions for HGV drivers have improved, but ultimately I have decided to carry on in my role at an investment bank. My wife has never driven anything larger than a Volvo, so she is also intending to decline the exciting opportunity.
It is nice to know there are specialist jobs available here for us though after Brexit. We would never have been headhunted to drive a lorry if we’d gone back to Germany"
Has satire gone too far?
I was hearing that we don't even have a "real" shortage bar one which was created
apparently we'd only need like 10% of those who've had their tests cancelled through all the covid BS to like, not be so short of drivers
But, quess which department was/is gonna be the last to open (not sure if they're open yet)
there has never been a better time
Other than like, several decades ago when drivers where actually respected by the companies they work for and those who run the industry?
This pill is a game-changer - but unfortunate since it means less Herman Cain Awards will be given out.
People seem to think it's just ivermectin but more expensive since they make that too
Even though the chemical formula and method of action aren't even close to the same...
I people take it hap hazardly we could create our own worst nightmare, stronger Covid. Essentially it’s the same thing that happens when antibacterial is used and people don’t take as many doses as they should. Some excapes which is slightly resistant and it builds up over time
is this true?
This is the same thing people say about the vaccines, since they aren't sterilizing against delta people either blame the vaccines for delta existing or say that with delta vaccinated people are just helping incubate stronger versions
I suppose I could see the logic of that second one, if standard covid can't survive in a vaccinated population but something that spreads faster and is deadlier spreads through a vaccinated population like a flu then when it hits an unvaccinated person they don't stand a chance
Of course the solution is for everyone to get vaccinated but that wouldn't let them be the victim
it's not even misinformation at this point
people are just hesitent and the fuss made over people not getting it and painting them as the dev just made shit worse
I was hesitent too months ago, said I wasn't gonna get it but ended up changing my mind other month
A lot of hesitation came from misinformation though. At this point it's pride in their viewpoint and belief that it's possible to manifest truth via your beliefs which are based on a facebook meme.
I mean, at least from what I saw over in my side of politics, most of the initial suspicions on the vaccine came from top ranking members of parties saying that they wouldn't take the vaccine
then said members get into power and all of a sudden it's like, YOU MUST TAKE IT!
I was worried about it the first few months, luckily I wasn't even eligible for it then so didn't have to make a decision either way
After a couple months of millions getting it if there was going to be something that was likely to happen to me we would know about it already
Yea, with my health I kinda wanted to hold out for a while, I was reading up on a condition that my doctor was like, concerned I might have, and apparently for some people the vaccine has made their condition much worse
But, I was kinda somewhat leading into an episode already so I kinda just figured fuck it
I'm due my 2nd dose now, and I'll probs get it like thursday or something and getting it's been a PITA as I don't live in the city centre and cos of my health it's a pita to move around too much
I think in general people should stop blaming each other, vaccines are out, people can get vaccinated to help combat the chance of infection/complications if they so choose. If everyone in your locality has had the chance to get vaccinated then realistically government involvement in the daily comings and goings in that locality can greatly decrease.
Then everyone can decide for themselves, as is their right and obligation, as to what additional risks they are willing to accept.
The politicization of it by either side pro/against and trying to coerce or shame people into getting/not getting it doesn't help anyone, and just makes people pick a side which is just childish.
what did i just read on the news lmao
"whistleblower claims facebook contributed to Capitol storming"
according to an ex employee, they turned off anti-misinformation settings too early
im just confused as to why she's only saying this now
About Facebook outage: https://twitter.com/njh_0/status/1445100456200581132
Sadly those idiots long moved to telegram
Biden on whether Democrats are considering a filibuster carve out to raise the debt ceiling: "Oh, I think that's a real possibility."
168
If the GOP continues to sit on its butt, then I'm pretty sure Manchin and Sinema are not willing to blow up the economy for the sake of the filibuster.
Should do the carve out then vote to get rid of the ceiling entirely
It's a dumb rule meant to appease the isolationists during WW1
Until 2011 it was mostly a thing Congress just raised on reflex without any drama
Fucking Tea Party ruined that though. Fucking Koch brothers.
I hate that we live in a world where this tweet has truth to it
they're all so ugly as well
like, obviously it's bad regardless of the art, but it could at least be pretty??
the fact that the guy got 2.7 million as well
I congratulate everyone on the holiday!!!!
this ain't the comparison you think it is
HA
So apparently the goal of Senate Republicans is to get the Democrats to use the reconciliation process for the debt ceiling, this would not only block them from also using it for their budget bill but due to the rules for that they would have to actually raise the debt ceiling instead of suspending it
That would mean they have an actual number they can use in campaigning next year to accuse the Democrats of spending too much money
Seems like the Republicans blinked first though, got us a few more months at least
its a band aid that will quickly fall off but good to see some resistance
There was some fears that they where aiming to use sb8 to work it up the ladder to attack roe, which, I mean, wouldn't entirely surprise me if that's the long game they're playing here
honestly pretty sure thats what theyre going for but my bets are they dont make it that far
supreme court would rule to repeal roe v wade since it's a republican majority but this is so blatantly unconstitutional I cant see it getting to that point
roe v. wade also isnt law, you can say the same thing with the 2nd amendment and gun control
it isn't law, but a ruling on the coverage of several constitutional amendments on womens' right to privacy
interpretations of the constitution will change with the supreme court.
it established a precedent which has done an outstanding amount of good for women in america
and furthered civil liberties and privacy beyond womens' rights
and rulings are like a gravel road, not concrete, it wasnt meant to be permanent. and on the side of civil liberties, eh, there are other more impactful movements that caused big changes.
the question this all begs is why are we still in a debate over the rights of women
why havent we made roe v wade into official legislation?
Because it's never been a "solid" ruling
welcome to the slugfest that is american politics
lol
it's not like "murder is wrong" where 90%+ of the population agrees that murder is in fact wrong
Theres always been calls to overturn roe v wade
And, it's not exactly "the rights of a woman"
I mean, you have the bible bashers who'll just "it's a sin"
yep, because people continue to try and control things that dont affect them over their own beliefs and prejudices
and what republicans have stated is what rights does a fetus have? or does it have 0 rights to life?
I mean, when does the unborn child become an entity with its own rights to live?
yea
I mean, I think that it's a complete farce, I don't neccessarily agree with abortions and theres many stories out there of it basically destroying women, but, I mean, who am I to say that people shouldn't be able to get an abortion?
I see it as if you don't agree with abortions, simply don't get one
exactly
If people need an abortion they should have safe access to it as a basic healthcare right, and anyone's opinion on the matter shouldnt weigh in on that
and I dont completely agree with abortions either, as it can done either way as a form of carefree sex.
I may disagree with that, but even assuming that's true what place does the government have to say what someone does with their body in private
their role should be to educate people as much as possible and allow them to make their own judgement calls
Issue is actually educating people these days
I am not saying that the government should be stepping in, I dont think the government has any reason to tell you what you to do.
which the republicans are also trying to block
same group who supported jim crow and all that horrible stuff 70 years ago is now actively trying to prevent people from learning what they did
You mean the CRT stuff?
not too sure what republican and supporting jim crow means, given that it was democrat run states after the civil war that enforced jim crow laws
Which was actively promoting materials which historic scholars basically called complete hogwash
hell, I think the first black politician was a republican
a worthwhile read
the party we know as republicans to this day is historically responsible for a vast majority of this
I mean many people on both sides supported this awful stuff but still
and how is it republicans that enforced this in the south when they werent in the majority in their state governments?
one of the right wing political commentators basically said, why is that as the south has gotten more republican leaning, that incidents of racism have fallen?
democrats and republicans switched platforms
I mean, that story is complex, and last I recall, basically 1 person who was a democrat who was heavily implicated in this "defected" to the repubs and the majority stayed
switching means, their names were essentially "flipped"
also a common popular myth that never happened
think about it, members of what party do you still see flying the "democrat"s confederate flag?
I mean, that story is spun around on both sides
yeah... but it did
where are your sources lol
I mean, have you looked at when this "flip" happened and if party members on mass switched?
very little in fact
the parties changed course after the civil war
this is from the official US Embassy website
seems kinda silly to argue with historical fact and call it a "myth" lol
This meant that a large number of Southern Democrats whose political views were more traditional and conservative, didn’t support Roosevelt’s liberal initiatives and joined the Republican Party instead. Roosevelt’s progressive, liberal policies play an important role in shifting the party’s political agenda to look like the modern Democratic Party as we know it today.
quote from article
this still hasnt changed my views on republicans, just that democrats have a faction of more left leaning politicians. Even as the fact states that republicans in the early 20th century are driven by economics and industry.
that hasnt changed really, hell, look at trump's platform on that.
you literally just told me what I said earlier
yep, historically they were driven by economics and industry to the point of fighting for slavery because it meant making a buck
I mean, I'm mentally dead but that article misses out a lot of timeline of stuff and such
just you argued a plain fact and now you're backtracking on what you were saying earlier
was trying to clear that up
im saying is that the republican party hasnt moved much from its positions...
which is true
if your talking about the democrats taking a nose dive into the left wing spectrum, then that is correct. Generally ive debated people who literally think republicans became democrats and democrats became republicans.
its just the republicans dont budge much in policy.
So your argument is that Republicans were always against freeing the slaves and the Civil Rights Act and were for Jim Crow laws and only Democrats changed position on those?
And Republicans were for the Confederacy? 😛
and so being right wing means I support slaves?
I consider myself right and I dont think slavery is justified
No but waving that flag around kind of does
how do you know those people are republicans?
I feel like I'm being trolled
I mean, unless its actually displayed at a state house...
no really, how can you tell a bunch of rednecks riding a beat up pickup truck displaying the confederate flag (which wasnt the official flag of the confederacy by the way, they used another flag) are republicans?
Before 2016 I would say it's hard to know for sure, they probably don't pay enough attention to politics anyway, but then Trump happened and pretty solidly linked the two
hell, the "leader" of the alt right, Richard Spencer, stated they didnt vote for trump in 2020.
- I don't know if I'd believe him
- I got the impression he was trying to troll the left by saying he was voting for Biden so that others could then say since Spencer voted for Biden that must mean Biden is a white supremacist
I'm not too sure he was trolling, I dont take him for his word either, however, this is sort of the same thing in regards to republicans. I'm not saying that they dont have racist people on board, hell, wouldnt be shocked if both parties had them. However I dont think what the republicans are enforcing is racist.
I'm not saying all racists are Republican, I'm just saying they're more likely to be
Culture war stuff is how the Republican party ties together rich elites and the working poor so they have to jump through hoops to support that stuff while not really supporting it
To some extent the Democrats have come to rely on culture war issues as well as the party has moved away from neoliberalism while still having to maintain a moderate base
same lmfao
"However I dont think what the republicans are enforcing is racist" theyre literally blocking CRT
from being taught
how is refusing race relations education not racist
I think any ideology based on enforcing race relations is bullshit
No one is actually teaching CRT to children anyway, that's a conlaw specialization that's only taught to grad students
CRT is no better than being racist
Educating about race relations is incredibly important
thats a pretty bad way to look at things
What they're trying to do is take what those people have figured out and use it to reframe history for children to highlight certain parts more
to help mend the massive problems with racism in modern society
I dont think we should be giving a damn about skin color.
with information which history scolars have disputed?
source
Pretty sure that even the author of one of the many well pushed materials even said her book was basically farce
I think its important to account for historic ethnic/racial discrimination because it affects minorities daily
instead of pretending everything is ok
because people who are actually subject to discrimination have to think about it
well, wouldnt democrat run cities technically be better off than republican rural towns?
The first time a lot of people heard of the Tulsa race massacre was when they saw it in The Watchmen TV show and a lot of people outside of the south didn't know what Juneteenth was until Trump decided to hold a rally in Tulsa on that day
this right here tells me that you don't understand what its like to be discriminated against systematically and have a level of privilege that grants you the ability to turn a blind eye to racism
So we're not doing a good job of teaching kids about the conflicts in our past
because that event set off one of the greatest suppression efforts in American history
and those suppression efforts continue to this day in the form of blocking CRT
The comparison to make would be Democrat run cities vs Republican run cities and the same with rural towns, if such a comparison could be made at all
You're not controlling for your variables
I dont know about caring about skin color and discrimination is? if people want to be treated equal, I will do so.
I have no issues based on skin color, Ive worked with plenty of successful minorities.
The problem with the colorblindness model that was pushed heavily in the 80s and 90s (that's how I was taught too) is that it makes you blind to systemic issues too
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/03/06/1619-project-new-york-times-mistake-122248
I'm too mentally drained right now to read the whole thing, but, apparently I somewhat mistated but I mean, it does apparently exhagerate core elements
I dont agree our system is perfect, hell, too many standard history classes tell us that is the case. What I dont agree with is the complete and utter damnation of said system and making a generation utterly hate the country they live in
thats why CRT is being pushed so hard against
Don't get me wrong, teaching the past is something we should do, but, exaggerating aspects of the past in an attempt to aid your framing doesn't really help
its hard to love a system that's kept your people down for a long time
Thinking it's meant to make a generate hate the US as a concept is some right wing talk radio shit
Also, CRT isn't "CRT", it is more just this exaggerated race education in which white people are and always will be oppressors
yep
Will teaching a generation with this model result in changes being made to the government and society? Hopefully, that is the point of it
its ok that you don't understand the push for race education because you arent an affected minority, but sitting in your ignorance and making judgement calls for other people based on your privileged experience isn't
That's only inherently a bad thing if you think things are perfect as they are
and this will get me kicked out of #politics, but eh, im kind of at that point with all politics channels. @shy gulch you are a glowing bastion of pureness and needs to shove their views down everyones throats. That is a dictatorship I want no part in
that's not breaking any rules lmao
knowing that america treated minorities poorly doesn't make me hate the country
america continues to treat minorities poorly and I don't hate the country either
meanwhile in the UK we just have the labour party calling everybody Comrade
TIL the british offered slaves freedom if they joined them in putting down the rebellion
how about
unequal sentencing for minorities, police brutality, race education, de-facto segregation (eg redlining and food deserts), education/housing inequality, employment discrimination
just to name a few
Which dragged most of the south into fighting against the british, they didn't have a choice anymore
a lot of it's a looooot of historical lack of investment, I wouldn't say it's a massive race issue these days as much of an historical class issue, just, race played a massive component in the original creation of that
Historical lack of investment and active destruction of any attempt to build themselves up
well unequal sentencing, we could start with legalizing cannabis use. that affected a lot of minorities and the policy put forth was racist.
It wasn't just that black businesses and communities were shunned, they were bombed, burnt, and knocked down to make highways and shopping malls
sentencing is a weird one where you're probs more likely to be seen as a potential re-offender if you meet certain criteria in their heads which kinda line up with the horror of the conditions there...
I mean, the american prision system is complete farce anways
yeah, the prison system is a joke. It doesnt help anyone
But yeah, today the primary driver might be class but racist motivations ensure the class divide
Although traffic stops are still a much more worrying thing for anyone non-white
And sentencing is biased even when you control for class
I mean, the education system is screwed too, which is why I'd be a massive proponent for things like school choice and private schools or whatever they're called in the US
yeah, I prefer the idea of school choice and private schools
Eh, the school choice stuff in the US is mostly used as a way to segregate schools
I disagree, especially in the most stupidly hit areas
A better solution would be to make school funding a state level thing based on population instead of being a school district thing so the richer areas have more funding due to higher property values and thus higher taxes
many people basically only have one choice of school and going elsewhere is generally a battle in its own right
I mean, part of the thing imho is getting rid of shit schools
they money should follow the child, which is what happened to me when I opted to change out of the local school system
I think the existing state and federal funding is based on attendance (and test scores...) but property taxes are a per-district thing
this caused the local school system to rapidly adopt new programs and update everything using limited funds
I saw a story other month, and have commented on it in the past, where a student was basically forced to repeat a year after he basically didn't attend all year
So the school in the rich suburb can get new computers every year and and build a fancy football stadium while the one in poor side of town can't afford toilet paper
you arent helping by denying the freedom to go anywhere.
We also spend way too much money on administration which is a whole different thing and would help with these problems too
His mother didn't know he wasn't attending school, which, defo offers some concerns there in regards to how didn't she know, was she not interested, did the school just not bother to try contacting her? (apparently attendence was a massive issue there in general)
Letting the people in the poor part of town who make a little extra money or have better work schedules (so they can provide transportation to a different school) flee to a different district might help them but it makes things worse for everyone else
The focus should be on fixing the broken schools so everyone can benefit
the focus should be, yes
id rather have schools compete, coming out of a failing system into one that put me on the right path
But I feel that the unions who are against even school choice are gonna be much of a battle there
Schools can't compete like that unless you have free bussing between districts
uh. yes, thats possible
You'd have to make it feasible for every student to flee the district otherwise you're stranding the rest into completely failure
the issue then would be capacity limits
@foggy fern funny enough, the high school I went to was actually a school setup in the 70s-80s for rejects and other children with problems.
its now considered a better school than the local towns
I mean, capacity limits are a massive set of issues for people try get out of the failing school system
schools literally hold lotteries to decide who gets admitted to them.
Right, and pretty much every school in the US is at or over capacity already anyway
I don't massively think that expanding these schools is the true fix for the issue, but, I feel that it's something which is much more feasable and doable politically
Even my fancy suburb rich school had capacity problems
(had 1 Mac for every 2 students though, in 2001)
I think it's fucking dumb that you'd have to consider basically allowing people to leave the current system for a shot in life, but, in many disadvantaged communties, these privately run schools seem to be highly vouched for, high in demand, and doing good stuff
funny enough, capacity wasnt an issue for my hometown after I graduated. a school meant to handle a class of 300 only had 40 graduate during a single year.
and this wasnt a rich town
Theres a few stories out there of people who'd basically been written off by the state system and had a massive kick in the ass when they where pushed over to a privately run school
after that class of 40, they did some real time improvements over the summer and got their shit together
iirc when I was a freshman the entire high school was less than 200 people but when I would have been a senior (wasn't there) the freshman class alone was over 100 people
they average around 150 now?
meanwhile the school I went to struggled to get 50 people in a year
We have 2600 in mine
fucking hell, id hate to be in that graduation ceremony
They have to do it on the field and last time they did it it started raining and the kept going until it started full on storming
I waited until my junior year to take some of the "fluff" classes like Spanish because I was cramming gen-eds (and took a couple before entering high school even) so I had to fight and argue to get in to some of my classes due to all the extra kids in the younger grades
@foggy fern meanwhile I was putting in hp gen8s in a server closet during my junior year.
Otherwise I would have had half a schedule my junior year but had to take 5 years of high school to get all the credits needed
I still ended up with one bullshit class which was basically just me in the library making sure the computers worked but mostly just reading slashdot because they wouldn't let me have a partial day schedule
It’s kinda insane here as the school has a huge drug issue and nobody does anything about it. The administration tells the school board everything here is great but it’s really bad. We’ve had 8 fights since Tuesday and multiple bomb and gun violence threats.
So yeah, even the rich folks had crowding issues, although they ended up building a new school like 2 years after that
Even though their high school was built in like 1992
I mean, over here we just have the general issue where the government is slow to react to stuff
it took my school being placed into special measures before we started getting funding to be able to do stuff like replacing the IT suite with computers which weren't falling apart
The actual city school district had several school buildings over 100 years old before they finally got enough money to replace them
I want to start recording my perspective and then go to the school board meeting with an hour of footage to show them it’s a big issue. You can’t walk into the restroom without being threatened or get made a target of criminal investigation.
And I’m only a freshman lol
100 year old house you can renovate and such to make it mostly work in a modern world but a 100 year old solid brick building meant they were putting in drop ceilings and subfloors and still couldn't get a forced air ventilation system set up so had no AC
We usually spent the first 2-3 weeks of school going home early due to heat
ye, ancient as fuck brick buildings
dont forget winter
sometimes it gets so cold that even the heaters werent enough
Usually for those days we had late starts anyway due to it being too cold for kids to wait for the bus or stand outside the school after the bus dropped them off but before class started
especially when they SCHEDULE ALL OF THE EXAMS DURING THE HOTTEST MONTH OF THE YEAR
Was it 38C in your building during those exams?
@mystic ermine this is why you have students install the hvac system.
Because it was in some of these schools at 3pm
Wait, not 38, 43
My nads aren't sweaty, they've fucking melted
not joking really, generally aside from a company coming in to assist, the high school I went too uses the student pool to help build and maintain the buildings at times
generally geared towards specific classes
Shit the average temps in the hottest month in London are 22 C
I mean, it's fun though, because we don't have ACs, and it gets humid af
and our buildings are optimised to retain heat
its nice work really, though you end up with some jank in the construction, such as leaving a door in the ceiling alongside a network switch.
poor cisco c3560-X
surprised that thing chugged along as it did
I think the shop class in my high school did work on the football team's little golf cart like things
It's like a golf cart and a tractor had a baby
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mVxXZhcpRfI - reminded me of this
This is why we don't go outside.
#sotrueyall #itsasouthernthing
Dude I fucking hated the humidity in Florida, I thought it was bad here but down there it's the worst days here but year round
Although it usually didn't get as hot there...
Yea, id doesn't get as hot but cos it's so humid, your bodies like, sole means of cooling down hardly works
Like, I've always lived pretty close to a large body of water too, so it's always ultra fun
some humidity is nice, but lack thereof can also be bad
some
some
Bro.
I went for a shower
hours later, my hair was still kinda damp
Yeah in Florida I was rinsing off in the shower a lot
@mystic ermine I lived near the ocean and on what would be considered a swamp for 21 years, I know humidity on an absolutely disgusting day.
please don't ping
ah sorry
I wish I'd been closer to the ocean, at least then I'd have a breeze and something positive to offset the awful
Yea, I mean, I aim to shower every like 2-3 days, I don't overshower as otherwise my hair just goes really horrible
But, damn
I was far enough away I needed a bus or uber to get there though
The wind wasn't the positive, I meant the beach 😛
sometimes it's basically like an asthmatic and kinda depressing
even more fun is when it feels like you're just blowing a hair dryer in your face
That's what it's like when you try to get by with just putting the windows down in the car in August 😛
Like, sure, you aren't sweaty while you're moving but it's hot as fuck still and you feel like you sweat worse whenever you hit a red light
oh god, at college, my mate used to drive us to and fro fairly often
some days you'd open the car door and just get a massive burst of hot air right in your kisser
Yeah that's called May-September here 😛
Wait, I think that's also a porn thing, not that one
Pmsl
pain and suffering, part 48592023
Jamaica coalition is looking more unlikely
The CDU is a mess right now, they are unable to be part of a government
The CSU understood that and is preparing to be a strong opposition
Am just glad laschet is not coming back to my state, he is president of my state right now, but said he booked a one way ticket to Berlin, and seems to actually stand by his word and will resign here
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/czech-billionaire-pm-babis-seeks-new-term-vote-too-close-call-2021-10-07/ Really hope Babiš won't win again... His government killed thousands people during pandemic by reckless decisions, also increased Czech debt by ridiculous amount. He also is in conflict of interest - he is prime minister and owns and controls several czech big companies, including media ones... Well, cross you fingers... Unfortunately he does many populistic moves like increasing pensions although our country cannot afford it, so many people will probably still elect him...
That's was so fun when I found out he's negotiating EU grants for building companies that his own company profits from or something like that 😂
Also loved the whole new Pandora papers thing where population was like, wow, what a great buisness man, glad he's my president
Well yeah, if it wasn't related to our country, it would be funny... but in past people resigned from poitics when there was just a suspition of some little incident... he was found guilty but he said he will never ever resign... so I guess this is our only hope... BTW our president said he will let him to build a new government even if his party won't win... so fun times, our president and PM is really dream wombo combo...
Oh don't worry, I also find the bullshit that's going on in my own country funny
The guy that tux linked carried demonstrants out of tree houses in a forest, because he constructed the idea of a fire hazard (he has since said publicly that that was made up to find a way to get them out)
And with carried I mean brutally beaten by police, one demonstrant fell and died
Just because the coal mafia wanted that protest to shut up and laschet did as he was commanded to
well I was in this phase several years ago... many thing done (mainly) by president and PM were kinda funny... but the non-existent future our country runs towards with current government makes it hard to find funny...
but someone created similare account on fb for president's spokesman, it actually have more followers than the official one and he makes funny posts... also real spokesman's account became lifestyle blog... so he creates a post and people share recipes and other usefull stuff under it, so there are some funny things... but overall it is pretty bad... (self-censored a lot, would be probably banned for language otherwise :D)
This is an... interesting premise for a movie https://www.imdb.com/title/tt11737466/
I highly doubt conservatives want that. if that was a mainstream platform for conservatives, republicans would split among the seams
nobody said anything about conservatives but ok
u literally saw “american insurrection” and immediately got defensive about conservatives, strange
I mean, I clicked on it
read the description
and it just felt like it was a typical "the left vs the world" type scenario
Actually, the premise is plausible. Dominionism, a horrifyingly relevant strain of mainstream GOP thought, essentially proposes this system.
the "aren't christian part" already happened during the patriot act after 9/11
Didn't have barcode but I swear for a while there it seemed like there was 1 FBI agent for every person of middle eastern descent
@shy gulch I'm not a conservative, but generally speaking, the plot the movie uses is what the far left generally uses to demonize regular conservatives. And much like Marxism/socialism, conservativism is like a spectrum. Not everyone is orthodox or extreme.
😳
The Czech Republic has a new government https://apple.news/AozIEDL6LQbu4_3A3j_-a5A
Apparently the conservative coalition came out on top
It's a not only conservative, it's 5 parties or something
Basically everybody else I think, lol
The goal was to get rid of babish or whatever his name is
Congrats @steady furnace i guess
Yeah, the result was as best as it could be, thank you! :-) we will se how president Zeman will complicate things as he promised he will name Babiš as PM and let him form new government regardless of elections result. He can do that twice and it can quite prolong forming new government. But the results are as best as anyone could have hoped. Communists and Czech social party are out of the play, Babiš's party is not first and democratic opposition have pretty big majority! :-)
And Zeman is in hospital, well that's that... His office was claiming he is healthy and fully able to do his presidential duties... Many people have doubts about that for a long time... Now it will be even harder to claim he is still able...
He should've abdicated long time ago... With some honour... He might have been a good or at least powerfull politician. What is he showinbg in past 4 years is just joke...
Kinda weird to have the president decides who gets to build a gov, here the parliment elects somebody (after they formed a coalition and agreed on a candidate) and then the president just signs it off and swears them in
I guess it was a traditional thing... But as Zeman has shown, it is possible to misuse any of his rights to do harm... (even if president had no power, his representation this spring was just...can't even describe it... No people should be this hateful and in this position? I am really glad that with those elections there is possibility for change...
But yeah, approach of your country makes more sense... At least in democratic country. One person should never have power to mangle with election results.
Dear Louis and all supporters of @fighttorepair, thanks for reaching out to me. 280 characters is not enough, so here is my response to you 😊 #RightToRepair https://t.co/6Z9fQiCMJG https://t.co/dGYkRzb4Lh
232
1081
One of the feew good people on the commission
The rest are all convicted criminals, lmao
slippery slope bullshit is always so boring
who is negatively impacted by this change vector
name one person
you think a fucking shampoo bottle not saying normal is gonna drive us into an oppressive society 💀
absolutely hilarious
as always, the biggest and most scariest enemy is the one you make up in your head
most scary*
an accurate description? typical for example
common perhaps
i mean, it really doesn't matter and i literally don't care
i don't believe this is going to lead to the downfall of society so i don't have much of an opinion tbh
sure, i mean you can read the article to see what their thoughts were
eh, products like that I dont really give too much of a damn
also what is normal when it comes to products like that?
no really? what is considered normal for soap?
lol
none of them have normal on the bottle ¯_(ツ)_/¯
they are unilever branded, right?
uhh i believe there were 3 bottles in there that were unilever yes
oh nevermind this isn't a new article
this is from march 10th lmao
i can't believe it... what next? crisps won't say plain? what is the world coming to 😢😓😥😱😢😲😓
ah, still, id rather go with old spice/local than whatever the fuck unilever pushes out
A problem with beauty products is that they sort of standardized on a particular subset of white people as 'normal' and everything else is some sort of abnormal. That sort of behavior is problematic and should be fixed (and fixing it isn't a bad sign for society - it just means we're accepting everyone for their hair, skin, etc) 
im not concerned with the bottle saying normal or not
will say, I didnt expect myself using old spice products 5 years ago, but I shifted away from all the expensive bullshit to something simple. $10 100ct blades are amazing.
Don't go making your own slippery slopes to fall down!
was just curious if any of the bottles said it or not because i don't think i've really ever noticed it before lmao
but they were all bought after march 10th anyways so
omg you're right, github no longer defaulting to master literally does mark the end times...
because fuck Gillette price hikes, along with almost every fucking 2+ blade razor on the market.
an oppressive society is when companies decide, free of any coercion aside from their own evaluation of what public opinion might be, to change how they market their products
Swapping to a word that makes more sense and avoids upsetting some people? This is awful and must be reverted.
I think git itself still uses master
and don't forget that i have just invented a big massive slip-n-slide in my head for us all to travel on!
not too sure if its upstream or just fedora isms when it comes to compatibility
but yeah, if anyone wants to free themselves from Unilever/Gillette, highly recommend single blades. they are stupid cheap. high upfront cost though, but handles last pretty much forever
when the consequences are imaginary, society-redefining scenarios that you've invented in your head in reaction to one word changing on a shampoo bottle, yes we do talk about slippery slopes
you mean to tell me history defines the consequences of a shampoo bottle changing one word just fine?
brb heading to jstor right now this shit sounds juicy
git added the ability to change the default branch name but was working through making all of their tests support this feature before they tried to actually change the default upstream
which ideology is it that has been crying for one word to be removed from a shampoo bottle?
because the ideology i see is that of a company voluntarily making a decision of its own free will without any coercion. which does correspond to an ideology, but probably not the one you're getting at here..
I'm not really concerned with the normal labeling. I do have concern when it becomes forced by government
I just stop using said product if I dont like them.
or a service
Main offends Christianity? Please elaborate.
So, "Jesus Christ" and derivatives? I can understand that.
@loud flax what you dont get is to cram how you feel down their throats. While the 1st amendment protects your rights to freedom of speech and assembly, it doesnt force people to listen to you.
theres a bible verse that says that if someone isnt into christianity dont constantly try to shove it down their throats
i cant find it though
it isnt necessarily a bad thing
only if you constantly bug someone about it when they obviously aren't interested
in the eyes of the person doing that*
its just annoying for someone who isnt interested
But find which god(s)? Do they exist, or is the person being duped into believing in a magical sky person? Does the religion they're being brought into encourage problematic behaviors like bigotry or sexism or abuse?
There's a big difference between teaching about math, which is concrete, and a specific variant of a religion.
wut
Respectfully, are you just ignoring Christian history from roughly 0BC to... roughly now? Because golly there's a lot of problems in there, many still today.
as much as I am right wing, I will side with leftists when it comes to religion and history
christian history is full of atrocities in the name of god
but that goes with most religions
I should correct that, organized religion isnt great
but then again, I treat communism the same as religion really, dogma and doctrine
That would mean forcing christianity on everyone, considering math is required for pretty much anything oO
that def is up for debate
religious studies should be taught in school, but of ALL major religions including all the bad shit they’ve done, not just the good stuff from one religion
science says otherwise
Yeah, teaching religions from a scientific/history standpoint is fine, but don't force your beliefs on anyone
Ah yes,
But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.
proven and reproducible science states that the universe came from chaos, formed by the trial-and-error interactions of gaseous and cosmic particles
So they can understand how to solve problems? 🤔
Christianity is a belief, Math is a science
because with all due respect christianity is all unprovable belief and opinion based on a several thousand year old book, math makes up the laws of the known universe and has been proven millions of times over
this is all one big yukes
yikes*
i suggest everyone else stop debating this person lol
Uh yikes. I'm out.
And even if you say the bible is right and god exists, there is still a lot up for interpretation and debate. as opposed to math, were 1+2 is always 2
Please re-read the bible quote you're replying to.
And be really careful because sexist speech is a zero tolerance item in our rules.
yeah also that’s not true at all, for example hormone replacement therapy can give someone the complete body characteristics of the opposite sex to match their gender and help with dysphoria
I said be careful going further in the direction of defending a verse that says woman have no authority over a man. Didn't give you an official warning, but moving in the direction of defending a verse that says women are to be in silence leads down a dangerous route.
it’s idiotic and outdated to say men and women are completely separate and more/less capable at certain things as a blanket statement
you would win Olympic gold in mental gymnastics
and??? muscle structure is different. how does that mean women are less capable
Okay here's directly from your site. This is hilariously sexist.
The repeated reference to "quietness" here again has more to do with self-control than with absolute lack of sound. Women were not to overtake a worship service, by taking control of public prayers or teaching, and especially not through hysterics or commotion.
The use of "hysterics" is icing on the poop cake.
LOL this is ridiculous, what the hell is this mf on
this article is so blatantly cultish and sexist
“help women act correctly “ what century are you from homie
cause it ain’t this one
Where does it say it makes women less than men?
It's literally saying women can't do things men can.
what does that MEAN
Same behavior for all genders.
Which apparently is specifically a woman problem! Per this verse.
ok but what does that have to do with women
baxter zwisxhenzug is obviously trolling
lmao
we keep engaging this Zwischenzug person and they’re gonna keep going
i suggest we stop
!ban @warm ibex Sexist troll
:raised_hands: Banned Zwischenzug#0780 (Sexist troll) [1 total infraction] -- mbaxter#1592.
Boop.
that bot should offer an option not to delete the messages because now this all makes 0 sense lmao
I think I let that go on for too long but hey, useful thought exercise at least. How to interact with someone from the first century.
perhaps you'd have to talk to that someone in Old English some variant of Proto-Germanic but yeah
i was having an interesting conversation with them, what went wrong?
The blatant sexist trolling is approximately where it went horribly wrong. Shame the backlog got deleted, but tl;dr rather sexist. Ah well. Shrug
sexism is cringe
wait, it doesn't add up anymore
There's very little about the Texas approach to this pandemic that has added up anywhere good.
i was considering voting for him during the primary just so the even loonier republicans don't get the nomination
but he's seemingly gone ... loonier lately
What if a so very out there candidate gets nomination so it finally flips the state blue? Might be the better option at this point.
i suppose that's a possibility too
dunno if i have enough faith in the democrats to pull someone moderate enough though
and by moderate i only mean someone who isn't completely 'anti 2nd amendment'
lol, just saw a clip of the head of the seattle police union complaining about the vaccine mandate being "bully tactics"
They'd know all about that, huh?
Smh, republicans destroying my freedom again. I, as a business owner, should have the freedom to mandate a vaccine!
2nd amendment was the weapons bullshit, right?
Can just nominate somebody who wants to do more useless background checks or whatever to please the masses
Well, first hurdle, do I really wanna watch a fox news video?
Oh god that actively hurts watching
First: what kinda people are you to shit on your colleges like that?
Second: if you talk about numbers, why not you know, show them? Lmao
Third: it's the same us vs the world bullshit right wingers always pull, everything is rigged or propaganda or whatever and they dont even care to talk about specifics
Idk why you made me watch that
Ngl definitely getting the vibe that you're trying to be purposefully antagonistic
It's pretty weird for Fox News to have a big segment about this to begin with
Like, sometimes the other networks will talk about the crazy things Tucker Carlson or whoever is saying which is already borderline weird but at least they're reporting on something kind of relevant
Shit talking another network about their ratings feels like some inside baseball junk
That has nothing to do with my political views tho
Exactly, you don't shit on colleagues
These are just universal principles, like human decency
If that's already something that you can't agree on anymore, then your are horribly detached from society
Eh, that's a bit much
I mean, isn't human decency like the fundament of our society?
to you, yes - the average member of the public is not gonna sit and give enough of a shot to think that a shampoo bottle renaming one word is a sign of hate
please, you've got to move on
it's one word on a shampoo bottle dude
one word
on a shampoo bottle
i literally don't care?
as ive said, i genuinely do not give a shit what the shampoo is called because there are quite possibly billions of things in my life that i care more about than one word on a shampoo bottle
the shampoo bottle renaming ideology 
please dude this is borderline worrying
go outside, talk to people - it's not some big grand conspiracy to rename shampoo bottles as a sign of a shift in morality lmfao
im not trying to see your side because it's one word on a shampoo bottle
like, please, do you genuinely see this as a sign of the downfall of our society?
is this actually a genuine fear you have
right okay, i mean this in the kindest way possible, please consider that all you're doing is sounding like some batshit conspiracy theorist here
you clearly care about this so why don't you know the answer to that
it seems like you repeatedly are coming to opinions on things without actually doing any research
they and the cleveland indians have done multiple months worth of consultations with stakeholder and members of the community (both affected and not affected)
maybe try and broaden your horizons from borderline neo-nazis sometimes yeah?
even basic research on the topics would help
five minutes of googling
would jesus sit crying about a shampoo bottle changing one word
literally who said they have gone through equal oppression
you've made up the enemy in your head again vector
There’s a big difference between “a word is harmful” and “every harmful word has the same level of harm and history”
It’s difficult to compare harm of words because of the vast difference in how they’re used and the history behind them
the enemy is.. the ideology of... being nice to people?
I mean you are stating far right talking points yes, likely due to listening to Jordan Peterson
🔥 https://curiositystream.com/philosophytube 🔥
A definition and demonstration of what ideology is, using Peterson's new book as the example! https://www.patreon.com/PhilosophyTube
Subscribe! http://tinyurl.com/pr99a46
Twitter: @PhilosophyTube
Email: philosophytubebusiness@gmail.com
Facebook: http://tinyurl.com/jgjek...
I do agree that in a lot of cases he’s not outright far right, but the way he approaches things encourages that type of thinking
Oh, they changed the title
Basically they're calling on Republicans to help elect moderate Democrats instead of people like Matt Gaetz
For disaffected Republicans, this means an openness to backing centrist Democrats. It will be difficult for lifelong Republicans to do this — akin to rooting for the other team out of fear that your own is ruining the sport entirely — but democracy is not a game, which is why when push comes to shove, patriotic conservatives should put country over party.
If that actually works it could be the start of the party that some day will replace the Republicans
For Democrats, this similarly means being open to conceding that there are certain races where progressives simply cannot win and acknowledging that it makes more sense to throw their lot in with a center-right candidate who can take out a more radical conservative.
Right, which is why it could be the start of a new party
love to see it, don't think there is saving the current republican party at this point
You build a coalition of voters across party lines to vote for centrists in races where only they'd win then those folks expand from there and try to vote in centrists everywhere
I don't think it'll actually work though
Oh, so you're into free healthcare for all and social programs to feed the poor! 😀
I bet Jesus would have a Bernie sticker on his bicycle. 😂
what's the tl;dr?
"we should be kind to others" and "we should not do the bare minimum to not offend people" are a weird pair of positions to take
That guy basically started tryna speak to somebody in the Klan and basically ended up taking the guys uniform home after he hung it up for good
okay, what on earth does that have to do with a company changing the name of their shampoo
who on earth was cancelling shampoo labels vector
is this the imaginary enemy again
who was cancelling shampoo labels
ask yourself the question, "is it cancel culture, or is it a company voluntarily making a change despite no social pressure for them to do so in order to gain publicity"
but your only other example was a company who went through months of consultation with the local community, affected stakeholder, impacted minority groups, fans and athletes before coming to a decision
it's "cancel culture" not "consultation culture"
Cancel culture, to the extent it's even a real thing, is really just a sign we need to abolish social media 😛
We have a history of people doing letter writing campaigns and such to make it clear when a company or person does something they don't agree with, social media just makes it a million times easier for people to dogpile on without really thinking about it
Companies or anyone popular enough and also rich enough to have a PR team welcome being "cancelled" because it's free advertising
"cancel culture" is a crappy rebrand of "accountability" for the most part.
Eh, the dogpile is the problem
Twitter villain of the day shit
That's just hilarious 😛
He had a contract for everyone that filmed in his buildings that, aside from getting paid, he also got to have a cameo. However, his contract didn't say the cameo had to make the final cut of the film, just that they had to film it.
I think Home Alone 2 was the only movie where they didn't just cut it first chance they got
I don't see the point of going back 30 years to remove him from a film, no
The details around why he was in the film make it kind of funny if they do so though
ah, you finally got round to reading the article then
The beauty industry has always made everyone who isn't their ideal group feel excluded, that's kind of their thing
link article pls i wa t to read
want
im on mobile and can’t find it lol
why is that a problem lol
a company is trying to be more inclusive to people who historically have been excluded on beauty products and make them feel more welcome
they’re a private company, if you don’t like progress and inclusivity then go buy from some backward ass brand lol
in a free market system, people vote with their money, so quit complaining about a single word on a hygiene brands product labels lmao
whats wrong with that?
being more inclusive
to minorities
to “us”? who you talking abt
how are white people lowered by a shampoo bottle company becoming more diverse and inclusive
your wording reeks of prejudice
Just seems dumb
navigate what, what is there to navigate? if you’re not an affected minority nothing changes for you, you keep the same privileges
to care about removing the term "normal" from their thing
exactly like let the company be more inclusive
doesn’t hurt you and helps others feel better
or for the term "normal" which describes the behavior of peoples hair to have any form of factor on their self worth or their incling to buy a product
More definitively, the survey also found that seven in 10 people felt that using the word “normal” on packaging and advertising had a negative impact on the consumer -- this number rose to eight out of 10 with people aged between 18 and 35.
but you wouldn’t like it if you had black hair and a beauty product insinuated that it wasn’t “normal”
i didn't know there were so many people that cared that the bottle said normal on it lol
i've never given it any thought
I mean, normal, I'd imagine in this context would describe the behavior of the average persons hair
there's gonna be people who need a different formula, or people who need extra stuff like for dandruff, etc
but wouldnt it be nicer if you were just …included?
The beauty industry is basically about feeding that nagging voice in your head telling you you aren't as good as the people in the ads but if you use their products maybe you can transform yourself to be more like them
im not saying i’m black because i’m not but trying to put this into perspective
I mean, inclusion of people is nice
But, I mean, is there a need to pander to self exclusion?
then there’s no problem with the word change then
if your hair needs extra care or attention than the regular consumer, is that an issue
🤷♂️
not “self” exclusion but ok
They've been transitioning instead to try to actually be about "being a better you" instead of just saying that while trying to sell you products to make you someone else
if the fact that your shampoo doesn't have the word "normal" on it but the one the majority of the population uses does, I'd argue that you're basically tryna exclude yourself if you take that as a personal dig
Normal is a weird word choice though when they presumably mean average
But it doesn't bother me either way
you're not really trying that hard tbh, like it's really zero effort for them to swap a word out - if it offends less people and is a more accurate word, literally what is the downside? who is negatively affected here? who is the victim?
I mean, I just kinda question "who cares"
Mostly because I'm a dude who doesn't care too much about his hair
nah it’s all good, and honestly it’s really awesome to see people who acknowledge their positions and perspective limitations
the 7/10 people they surveyed?
kezz based once again
That's the thing, it doesn't bother you (or me for that matter), but we aren't maginzed (or however you spell that)
Well, that doesn't really clarify "who" they surveyed, but, I mean, as I said, why does your shampoo not saying "normal" on it have some incling against you
When I was trying to pay attention to that stuff I never bought the "normal" hair shampoo though since my hair isn't "normal"
It's hair?
I used to have to use the anti-dandruff stuff
some of my friends of color have to go towards more moisturising brands of shampoo otherwise their hair dries out faster
go ask the 7/10 people they surveyed lmao
just because you can't think of a reason, doesn't mean one doesn't exist
exactly
moving away from biased and overly gendered products is something im all for
like, if you're having to sit here questioning why a progressive change was made, you're probably not the target...
the idk was the important part there cat
Just feels that people have their values in the wrong place
again, just because you can't understand or see why X happened, doesn't mean there was no reason for X to happen
sometimes it sucks for certain people to have to read something that’s worded a certain way for whatever reason, and for a lot of people(myself included) who care a lot@about their hair it’s nice to feel included
as dumb as it may seem
they're a shampoo company?! wtf else can they do lmao???
if you’re not affected
ofc their progressive change is gonna be shampoo based that's literally all they do
I mean, these are often larger firms which deal with other aspects in their business
They could like, invest more resources into the people whom they say they're tryna help
does doing X mean you can't also do Y
i cant speak for kezz but ALL THE TIME. tiny little things you wouldn’t even think about
like, are you saying this knowing that they aren't doing Y, or are you just guessing?
and I live in a place that’s very queer-friendly
Why would a label stop you from using whatever product you want to use
Is this the "woke brands" argument then? You're fine with them doing this but think it's just a marketing thing so doesn't deserve praise?
I'm okay with that argument, it's probably true most of the time
Pretty much
Their customers (or potential customers) say they don't like the name, they change the name, they get attention for it (positive or negative), that makes you talk about them more, maybe you need some new shampoo and hey I've been hearing a lot about Dove recently
I mean I don’t even use dove products anyway but I think they took a step in the right direction
How is dove changing wording on the product a step in the right direction
I mean, props to them for being more inclusive, but, I mean, I'm the type of person who'd kinda love to see whom the 7/10 are, is "normal" an actual issue or are they just gonna move onto another post, i.e. is this more a self inflicted confidence issue rather than an actual sociatal issue that product marketed for the majority of the country have the word "normal" on it, especially in terms of a product in which outside of a few people I know, just use the "regular" brands
But, I mean, we where all happy and clapping a few months ago when all of the big brands repainted their logos with the flag (in regions where they'd gain points and nowhere else, and removed the instant the clock took over and the social team was in)
rainbow capitalism where companies queerbait for profit isn’t ok, but it’s nice to have brands do rainbow stuff out of actual solidarity
it’s frustrating when cishet people commenting negatively on things that don’t affect them
Cishet
what?
Havent heard that before was googling it
oh haha it means cisgender/heterosexual
For biological sexes there are probably like 5? I don't know the exact number but it's more than 2. Gender is a social construct though so there are as many as we say there are.
We being society
even biological sex is just classification of primary/secondary sex characteristics under common groupings
which happens to be relatively bimodal
if gender is a social construct, it means it can change per society. It can be as rigid as traditional binary system or be whatever the fuck it is today that is being spread out.
with that being said, I just avoid the whole gender bullshit, its either your name or they
genders are overrated
gender was invented by bathroom companies to sell twice as many bathrooms
yeah, why not have a single bathroom hall with stall walls from floor to ceiling?
zyphys with the facts
there are 3, the third one being hermaphrodites (Assuming you're talking about every animal on the planet)
generally speaking though most species are in the male/female category
(I'm not sure if you count asexual animals as a biological sex category though so I left that out)
well no
that's not true at all lmao
and no biologist uses the term hermaphrodite anymore
yeah pretty sure thats not a nice word to use anymore
well it's not if you're specifically calling someone that yeah
so why'd you use it then? lol
the term most people use now is intersex afaik
no, even in other species that term isn't really used anymore
what on earth are you on about vector
this mf buggin
what does that have to do with anything lmao
are you really trying to compare scientific understanding evolving to people who once thought slavery was okay?
"a discussion about science? let's talk about slavery!"
makes sense yup 👍
good, nice to hear you've become an enthusiastic supporter of trans rights then vector
lessgo
growth 💪
I am aware yeah, it was phased out eventually because there was such a wide spectrum that you couldn't make a sharp distinction between whether an animal was or wasn't... Well, y'know, unlike what scientists initially thought
progress 😈
Because then how would creeps peer through the huge gaps in American stalls?
you can be the dumbass like me and headbutt the door till it breaks lmfao
Don't actually do this kids
Disclaimer: I didn't do this to the door of a bathroom stall
take security screwdriver into stall, remove entire stall, epic prank
gender is a spectrum
let me put it this way
It's complicated, that's all I can say
as amaranth said, it is widely accepted that gender is a social construct
if all your friends told you to jump off a cliff, would you do it?
(I don't think there are that many though?)
if all your friends told you to conform to gender and societal norms, would you do it?
sorry for my ignorance but I genuinely don't know
there can be as many or as little as you like, it's a construct
we didn't go and dig up old fossils that told us that girls wear dresses
vector rejects their biological sex assigned at birth? based
these are the roles and constructs that have been created and moulded by society
thus they are as malleable as you want them to be
women's suffrage was damaging? what
I'm guessing you're referring to the events that led to suffrage?
oh
im sure they'll be really happy to hear you say this
to be fair back then some places did treat women pretty badly before suffrage was a thing so Vector has a point
i mean how would women have have known they were capable before? now they know
women all around can rejoice they finally have vector's approval
no need to be so sarcastic y'all I don't think that's what Vector meant...
rofl! 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 ]
um
uh
whos gonna tell them
guys... calm down a little before continuing to debate...
well, blatant transphobia, weird holocaust stuff i can't really remember, hosting other far right people regularly, etc, etc
oh yeah, racism, rejection of provably true details on white privilege, etc, using nazi/alt-right dogwhistles
refuses to use preferred pronouns is one teensy other little thing he does
yes, he's against a bill that doesn't exist - the actual bill was so watered down and boring compared to the one he invented in his head to campaign against
what in the actual world is compelled speech
at this point I can't be sure if it's good or bad that have no idea what most of this stuff is