#politics
1 messages · Page 74 of 1
I mean, yea, but we're not exactly there yet and we're still at the point where mutations are much more risky to us vs the flu
And keep in mind, all the future Covid deaths are not “additional” deaths, some, if not a large group, would’ve died from something else
It’s not cumulative like that
a lot of it is optics
There are literally people out there whose reason for wearing a mask is so that they're not mistaken for being a republican
Yeah, and optics don’t mean shit for my health, or anyone else’s.
I feel like this idea is optimistic. Lets say it is mandated that everyone wears masks when indoors (which was, at some point or another, true in many locations). It only takes 1 person to not wear their mask, 1 person to through a party, 1 carrier to take a long plane trip to spread the disease.
While probably true that vaccinated people wearing masks are highly unlikely to spread the virus, the virus is going to (mostly) be spread through either the unvaccinated people without masks.
Yea, but you're acting like politicians give a shit about your health
What I am trying to say is that variants are more then likely going to be made either way.
Well to go back to my thing, only 1/4 of the world is fully vaxxed
If there’s gonna be a mutation, it is highly unlikely to come from where I am where the vast majority of people are vaxxed
And my state can’t force everyone in Brazil, or Pakistan to wear masks
Yes exactly, if there is a mutation, it’ll go everywhere
^
So my county attempting to prevent one is laughable
I heard the delta variant likely emerged in India
Which is literally the entire point as to why ideally everybody would wear a mask and avoid going outside like the floor is lava
Remember that meme about the digger trying to get the ship unstuck?
I mean, the suspect is that it may have evolved due to the heavy restrictions at some point
That’s what mask mandates in the US are like, particularly in highly vaxxed areas
I mean, a lot of this is catch 22
What I think we are trying to say is that we understand that masks will help prevent variants, but the variants are more then likely going to come from other locations/people rather then in places with high vaccination rates.
Ideally we'd all agree to stock our freezers for a month and basically agree that nobody leaves the house for that month
But, realistically, that's not gonna happen
Govenrments keep thinking that they're gonna totally squash this and the optics and judgement is basically set so
NYC still has indoor outdoor dining
The thing here is that the numbers are basically all set up to be a game, and many people treat them as such; There are people willing to hand over their lives to the government on the hopes that covid will disappear, there are people who'll scream freedom over a fucking piece of cloth which like, you know, to the degrees that the only way a state would ever get rid of it would be to start banning inter-state travel which, I can't see that happening
idk what the end term is gonna be here, especially as people still seem to think we can beat this
Many people are pissed off at the governments excessive controls over something which likely ain't gonna disappear unless everybody actually all got along, the governments around the world did such a piss poor job of tryna contain this early that we're basically just screwed
Did I see that Biden admin is extending mask mandates on planes until January 28th?
January, in 5 months
Like seriously? You’re gonna say that yep, we know the situation in 5 months
I'd be interested in seeing the effectiveness of masks when you're stuck in a tin can for hours on end
I don't mind masks on planes, but...^
Like, if 1 person is a carrier and you are in a sealed environment for, say, 3 hours, masks probably aren't going to help much
(Especially since that carrier is probably the kind of person to take off their mask, cough without covering their mouth, etc)
Well, apparently the truck drivers in QLD Australia are going on strike in response to an organization or company or something forcing the truck drivers to be vaccinated. Compulsory vaccinations are stupid like they don't even prevent you from getting, or spreading covid-19, it's like saying "Oh, you have to wear a bicycle helmet wherever you walk now, just in case you trip" xD (well at least afaik anyway)
I'm still amazed that we've regressed so far as to say vaccine mandates are bad. Should I expect regressives conservatives to start repealing seatbelt laws in 2022?
I don't think anybody should be mandated to have a vaccine...
I believe there is an extraordinary danger in allowing mandates like that. Replace covid vaccine with expiremental drugs, for example.
kek
remembers the few vaccines he had to have before he could start taking college classes
iirc airplanes are surprisingly well ventilated
It was a surprise that SARS seemed to be able to spread so far in a plane, estimates were it'd only be a row or two
Yea, they throw air out the back more or less, guess I more mean closed room type thing
Fair, but the vaccines are relatively new. Don't get me wrong, I have the vaccine and I think everybody should have the vaccine, BUT mandations seem wrong to me.
FDA approval today for one of them. Totally reasonable to mandate now in the US.
going to college isn't a right. One chooses to do that. thats not the type of mandate CJCrafter is talking about I think
forcing every eligible person get the vaccine is a mandate
pfizer got FDA approval which means it's onto the next stage
The size of the trial groups and the infectiousness of the virus is why the trials could be completed so quickly, btw
Initial message against mandates above was after a company forcing truck drivers to be vaccinated 🤷
An HIV vaccine, for example, is going to take years of trials to get enough data to prove efficacy
courts have long recognized a right to refuse treatment
refusing a vaccine would certainly fall in that category I think
Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the authority of states to enforce compulsory vaccination laws. The Court's decision articulated the view that individual liberty is not absolute and is subject to the police power of the state.
private company does as private company does
I don’t think private company should be a valid excuse.
Jacobson also has been a precedent case in justifying government face mask orders and stay-at-home orders throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.
🥳
ah yes, the court case used to justify sterilization of those with intellectual disabilities
I mean, it's not really an excuse
Buck v Bell if you were wondering
a company has general rights to fire you for whatever they want so long as it doesn't break any protection clauses, etc
sterilization of the "unfit" "for the protection and health of the state"
I have doubts that "didn't want to get a vaccine" is a protected status
also, its not hypocritical to say "my body, my choice", but also be for forcing medical procedures on unwilling participants?
Now, there are some concerns I have there, e.g. before lockdown, my GP closed and I moved, my doctor and I where going over potential diagnosis for an auto-immune disease in which the vaccine is really shaky territory
there is no way in hell I would trust a government of all organizations with mandating health decisions for everyone. This is the government that said margarine is much better for you than real butter (that turned out to be wildly wrong), and tons of other instances of the government giving out the wrong health advice
There are always extremes like that. Of course specific conditions in which a vaccination could cause you harm, mandating in that scenario is criminal.
Well I suppose the FDA has approved the first covid vaccine not very long ago x)
it may have been thought of to be right at the time, but if it was proven wrong later, thats just as meaningful.
Skinner v. Oklahoma basically overturned Buck v Bell and the ADA should have completely wiped it out
Jacobson was used to uphold texas halting abortions during covid
Yeah, I can understand how that'd work
I highly doubt the SCOTUS would re-affirm jacobson now and since that was in 1905, and was only re-affirmed in 1922, I think theres a good chance they'd take it up
but setting aside the legality, isn't it hypocritical to say "my body, my choice" and also be for forcing unwilling participation in medical procedures?
and, that government isn't known to always be the best source of health info, to also have the power to mandate treatments
Eh, the easiest way to explain the difference is probably the Non-Aggression Principle from libertarianism
You not getting vaccinated has a detrimental impact on society
I assume that is referring to the liberal stance on abortion?
We've mostly sidestepped the issue by just making certain vaccinations a requirement for things like schooling or military service
Amusingly I think it's actually only the military where there is a strict ban on mandating non-approved vaccinations, fallout from the Anthrax vaccine
It was thought the vaccine was the cause of Gulf War Syndrome although now it seems the mostly likely cause was bromide tablets and pesticides
I dont think that the government should force a vaccine upon its people, however i think it's perfectly reasonable for companies to require it for their employees, since if that person doesn't like that job, they dont have to work there. ofc if there is reasonable religous or medical reasons they cannot get the vaccine, they shouldnt be punished for that
What do you think about lgbt?
Is lgbt manifestations for lgbt or for money only?
In My opinion this is only for money.
Your question is too broad to be properly answered.
Any attention for oppressed minorities is good in a way
It's basically similar to greenwashing
Better then doing nothing, still not enough
I feel like People help minorities, but they format about their own culture
They format? What does that mean
Lgbt becames fashion. People manifest how they like lgbt. And some of them became lgbt, even when they arent
Gays can take care of children, but its not always good for them
We are loosing our tradition to "modernity"
Sometimes We dont know who We are
always good
To be fair, have you seen modern parents, better yet the parents that made Gen Z?
Sometimes modern parents are better, but in most of cases children need Mother And father like in nature
We cant cheat nature
Oh god
Humanity is nature, by definition
Traditions are stupid. If the only argument to keep doing something is "we have always been doing it this way", then something is very wrong
I support the LGBT, being s member myself; I think that a lot of stuff is nuanced, however
I'm dead in bed but there are many studies which indicate that families with heterosexual parents generally have better outcomes, but, such may be one-sided literature
Both parents play a pretty critical role in development, and the literature generally seems to suggest that hetero parents generally make one of both sides of the coin, the mother generally helps with development of the emotional and nurturing side, and the father seems to head towards discipline aspects as well as play
In the video above, Alexander Stockton, a producer on the Opinion Video team, explores two of the main reasons the number of Covid cases is soaring once again in the United States: vaccine hesitancy and refusal.
“It’s hard to watch the pandemic drag on as Americans refuse the vaccine in the name of freedom,” he says.
Seeking understanding, Mr....
lmao the trump ad
We're now in the last 3 weeks of the Norwegian general election, and polls are showing heavy lean towards the red/green coalition with huge losses in especially Labour, the Centre party, Conservatives, and the straight up racist Capitalist party 
It'll be interesting to see which parties form government as half the left side refuse to collaborate with one another
Almost everything we do is unnatural, being born in a hospital and C section is unnatural. So what if someone had LGBQT Parents, I believe that those parents would be just as dedicated to there children and would so anything to ensure their success in life
what literature are you talking about here? would be interested in reading them
The problem with studies like that is you don't know if two hetero parents do better due some innate benefit, to falling in to traditional gender roles, because the kid doesn't get teased or made to feel weird at school, etc
yes, which is why i would be interested to look at this to see if they accounted for that or not
There were very good reasons why the household used to be housewife and breadwinner. Now, since life is easier today, we have less reasons to organize in such away, but there are still reasons to keep some form of traditional family (though the housewife and breadwinner is an extreme for today).
Today those reasons are mostly financial. For example, single parent homes are much more likely to have financial problems, and their children are more likely to have low paying jobs.
As for lgbt households, I am unsure. I’ve seen a few extremes were the parents had/adopted a child but chose to make them “genderless”, which is obviously going to hurt that child’s mental health. The only problem that I suspect would occur is that the children produced from lgbt homes aren’t taught values from a mother and father.
That's what am saying, you constantly need to reevaluate if your values and traditions still make sense
"taught values"
And adjust accordingly
the last bit you said, I can't believe someone other than me would utter that sentiment. I agree with you too. I wonder how many who identify as LGBTQ aren't doing so because of their biology, but for other factors
Finally someone who agre with me
in other words, trauma, for instance, can do absolute horrors to someone
a woman who has dated a number of guys only to be dumped by all of them, might end up dating women because they're so fed up with men, and then identify as lesbian
i'd imagine the number is fairly low though
Starting with the premise that the claims of benefits from a dual-sides contribution are true: How much of them playing those roles is biological, though? I suspect the answer is none of it. I get the feeling that they only play those roles on average due to societal expectations and it's not at all necessary for it to be from a hetero couple.
I'm not lgbt, but I don't hate lgbt. I hate things some members of lgbt community do. Like vandalism for example. Being lgbt not allows you to do theese things.
vandalism?
I hate things some members of lgbt community do. Like vandalism for example.
I hate things some people who are not members of the lgbt community do. Like vandalism for example.
yes, like on manifestations
Take a look at children without a father figure. Children are better socially if they have a father.
There are extremes on both sides
Fine, but why does that represent the entire community?
If we're going to blame lgbt ties on all sorts of random acts, this is going to end really poorly when we have to start blaming cishet identity for all the acts of cishet people...
Yes but you are saying that that is because they are lgbt.
and they justify they are lgbt
There are always extremes. Best to leave those out of rati9nal arguments
no
I mean there are some poeple who thing they are lgbt so they can devastate others property
who excuses that they are lgbt
I mean that being lgbt is not excuse
What is your argument?
And some people believe that by being white they are superior and can harm those who are not. Shall we judge all white folks based on their acts too? 🤔
no but we all have the potential to be hitler
The rights of minorities shouldn't be a permission to break law. Some of people excuses being a member of minority to doing disallowed things
"a permission to break law" are we in the same universe here?
where is it legal to break the law if you're a minority?
Minorities dont get the ability to evade the law...
If white person does something against the law, they should bear responsibily of that. Being white or black or everyone else is not excuse
sounds dope tho let me come to your country if that is the case
A better argument which is similar to this one is where the line is between left and alt-left.
alt-left 
Great. Glad we agree on this. Why are you so fixated on somebody trying to use lgbt identity for this, though?
if anything it's usually black people who get harsher punishments simply for having a different skin color
its only an example
i don't see how they are privileged in that regard
Minorities are generally discriminated by the law more often then they are privileged
Ive never heard of someone using minority status as a way to evade the law
Nowhere, but someones behave as if it were so
Why make your initial statement starting this discussion? I don't understand what you're trying to get at, here.
who are these "someone's"
it really sounds like you're just making up people that don't exist to get mad at
they are members of minorities who excuse being member of minority to break the law
You appear fixated on specifically lgbt people doing so.
Like who...
I can only think of examples of BLM supporters and antifa where the police don't step in (portland), but are there examples of LGBTQ activists that aren't handled by the police?
"antifa"
There are alot of people who use prejudice against minorities too
they also didn't step in for proud boys, so... 🤷
oh, well poo
Whats your point TheRedCat
those poor discriminated against cishet white men with their fear of people different from themselves 😦
@near glen lol, digging antifa huh? well I think it's funny, they act like fascists while trying to prevent fascism
I wanted to prove that people sometimes allows some members of minorities to excuse them
antifa its great example of that
They used to be! We called them the Allies. 🤣
Ive never seen someone successfully use their minority status to get around the law, however Ive seen alot of people use the law to attack minorities
I feel like this discussion is structured around some fox news built strawman.
there are people like that
I watched Fox(Fictional) News once and immediately turned it off
There is always going to be people who try and exploit their situation, but the amount of people who exploit Minority statuses are WAY WAY lower then people discriminated against because of it
Probably most of this community are left and I'm right nearly alone
I'm right, its funny
Im centuralist btw
There have been 10s of millions of people who have attacked because they were a minority, but maybe at most a few thousand who exploit it
maybe, but these thousands should bear responsibility of that.
minority is a way to explain yourself not a privilige
sorry typo, express yourself
Speaking of Portland, it seems like every week a bunch of white nationalists invade the city from all over the state and country and break shit
Police never seem to do anything about them
Okay, and those tens of millions should bear responsibility for their actions too. Still not seeing your point here.
“As science has proven and now the 6th Circuit agrees, enacting a mask mandate in the manner in which MDHHS did so does not violate one’s rights”. How can “science” prove something about individual rights?
This isn’t a comment on what’s right or not, but isn’t it strange to say that science has proved something doesn’t violate ones rights?
That’s a quote from the Michigan AG
is that the entire quote?
feels either out of context or it's politicians messing up their words
It’s just another example of politicians abusing the word science
“Science” is this holy, infallible thing that is always correct, and every “scientist” is always in agreement on
I watched some misinfo spreaders doing lots of "trust the science!" BS on mask "dangers" yesterday. It's rough watching concepts get misused like that.
which science
a flat earther's science, or anti-vaxxer science, mainstream science, oh boy, why are there so many conclusions to the same data, lmao
Science itself is never solid, and is flexible. Science assists in explaining the properties of the world. What should happen is that observation for science should be under an impartial lens, This though doesnt happen often anymore. More and more activists have used the word science to often skew their own agenda, and hell, A lot of tyrannical governments have used science as a way to push certain population control policies.
solely basing policy on science isnt good, because it does and will ignore human factors, such as data that has either on accident or on purpose skewed to meet the needs of said policy.

lol i wasn't even sure how to respond to that
dystopic
My ideas are more often right leaning then left. What you are saying is a non argument. Like, "Violence is bad!". We're responding, "no shit, sherlock". Your argument would be better if you could find specific examples of minorities getting excused from crimes solely based on the fact that they are a minority.
https://twitter.com/unwatch/status/1430325480754982913?s=21
This can’t happen right? I mean come on. I know that like China and Pakistan are on there, but you can’t put the Taliban on there
Oh China and Pakistan are on the “human rights council” not this
But doing this has to be worse than China being on the human rights council right?
wat
Oh it’s possible cause Afghanistan already had a seat on this commission
And typically a new government inherits their predecessors seats on various councils and commissions
Doesn’t have to be that way, so please UN, don’t meet my expectations by just letting the actual Taliban have an actual seat on this commission
Well, I mean, makes sense but, eerrr
defo doesn't look good if you don't understand/aren't aware of that stuff
Just watch the Taliban become progressive.
For that we need to get rid of religion first
Maybe with time.
lol
religion isn't going to go away, sorry to say to anyone that wants it eradicated
if there is no god then at one point there was no religion
but perhaps if everyone was scientifically literate post religion, there might not be a reason for it
but knowing people, i don't think the future would be that linear at all
I mean whats my political side
by saig right
not a thruth of your opinions
Your just saying x is bad, and were saying yes x is bad, but y is worse and happens more often, your blowing x way out of proportion with no evidence or foundation while y has happened to millions more and is way worse
What do you people, especially people in countries/states where it’s legal, think about informed consent in healthcare?
Most of Europe (to my knowledge) does their best to avoid it entirely, and I’m not really convinced it’s a bad thing. It somewhat falls under the same point as the moral decision of choosing abortions to me: no-one should force the words of their holy book on me, but I am very much allowed to choose to think it’s unacceptable myself.
Additionally, I see no reason to directly work against self-medication; if you’re taking your own medicine, you should sure as hell know what you’re doing and should rather be supported in doing it safely
"Informed Consent" wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing if the "information" being given isn't bias is one way or another and they aren't trying to fear monger the patient. In general tho, it's really a weird thing for abortions because those have a really black and white outcome (the baby will no longer be born period). There is nothing to really inform them on here because the patient already understands the outcome (as there is only one clear one).
Most of Europe (to my knowledge) does their best to avoid it entirely
European doctors avoid letting their patients know what procedure they're going to do or why they're doing it?
For abortions it seems like informed consent is exclusively used to make the patient second guess themselves (by shame or other means) which is generally a bad thing?
As for self-medication, that's illegal (in the states at least). You need a prescription to even get one as they may have weird outcomes that you are unable to think of yourself.
As in politicians avoid the topic altogether, and if it should be asked, it’s never supported — even by our most liberal politicians.
I don't understand. Nobody wants patients to know anything about what's happening from going to the hospital to leaving it?
No, the ability to do informed consent (as opposed to requiring maaany extra boxes to be filled) is avoided
I do suppose to some extent we do have informed consent with e.g. birth control, though…
Some informed consent laws have been criticized for allegedly using "loaded language in an apparently deliberate attempt to 'personify' the fetus," but those critics acknowledge that "most of the information in the [legally mandated] materials about abortion comports with recent scientific findings and the principles of informed consent", although "some content is either misleading or altogether incorrect."
Very interesting, thanks
Over in the UK we have informed consent but it's more of a formality than anything else, outside of health orders, your doctor basically has to give you the understanding of what they're gonna do, when I had an infection in my toe my GP explained it to me, when I had an OP to deal with my ingrown toe nails, the process was explained to me, when I was looking at meds for my loose screws, the doctor walked me through it all and such and my views where basically considered, but, I think that aspect varies doc to doc, some will preach their holy book while most doctors I've been with are willing to accept that people google stuff and may have some form of idea of the implications and know their body more than the doctor
That does mean that when it comes to abortions they are gonna explain the procedure to you, they legally have to in order to get your consent, but, they generally go to it from a procedural aspect than anything else, I think anything loaded would basically get the doctor into so much shit
lol sigh
still gonna vote for the guy when he's up for re-election unless a democrat has a real shot at beating him (lul)
i dislike abbott, but he knows how to get votes
the recent string of laws that are set to take effect in september i hate (most of them)
The execute order is binding already, but anti democratic, so he wants to make it a law later, do I understand that correctly?
But man, america, I thought you were the land on the free, why is government placing restrictions on the way I wanna run my store? Smh
nobody seems to have ideals here
Oh I understood it wrong, he basically forbids local county gov or whatever to require vaccinations
That makes more sense
I can actually follow the argument
https://www.ksat.com/news/local/2021/08/25/9-new-laws-that-take-effect-sept-1-in-texas/
there's this too
That means I can still only allow vaccinated people into my store
the "vaccine passport" law forbids stores from checking for vaccination cards
Yeah just read that
Fuck that
That list is such a clusterfuck 😂
Carrying a gun, openly, without a licence
Oh right this one
Additionally, any person in Texas, with the exception of state and local government employees, will be allowed to sue abortion providers or anyone they allege to have assisted a woman in obtaining the procedure. That could include providing transportation to a clinic.
aaaaaaaay a good one though:
Police officers will now be required to keep their body-worn cameras on during investigations.
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahaha what
The government, and any public official, will be prohibited from issuing orders that close a place of worship in Texas, including during a disaster.
that's taking power away from abbott
USA
this new law will require professional sports teams that have contracts with the state to play the anthem prior to the start of every game.
good in theory, but the files get "corrupted" or "the camera didnt work"
while you've seen abbott and how crazy he might be
Of course.
the people in the texas senate are so much worse
lol that's why i'll probably vote for abbott anyways because while he might not be great
they also set up a hotline to report abortions
some of the alternatives are way way worse
Stasi wants to know your location 😂
the medical marijuana bill isn't too bad too
I thought Germany taught everyone that citizen snitching on each other turns everything into a giant clusterfuck
yea
i honestly hope the hotline gets trolled into oblivion
Freedom*!
*unless you’re a minority, woman, societal liberal, religious outside christianity, …
they made quorum again too, the dems that went to D.C are back so they can vote on that voting restriction bill now
I think I have a right to be protected from a pandemic, that should be more important than the freedom of others not to wear a mask, just saying
i don't recall liberty being the first unalienable right 🤔
lol
Liberty and control over one's own body is pretty much an unalienable right in the first world, and I'm not quite sure why you time and time again choose to not join us. Do you really only have 1 unalienable right even now? The rest of us are in the hundreds by now, because we see that a lot of people's rights are 100% necessary and thus effectively unalienable (although yes, not legally) and we wouldn't have nightmares of losing them in any timeline.
The right to vote is one of these for the record -- I don't see how the US can see it's fine to revoke this right from someone for not following the law
Well we (everyone?) Has 3, life liberty and the pursuit of happiness in that order, then we have the bill of rights too
Idk how much of these translate to how many are defined in Europe though
Everyone in Europe yoinked from France, so we have the same as Germany ^ does
In addition to that however, I would definitely deem rights that are basically impossible to remove without a coup happening unalienable as well, which extends it to a lot more than just those 3
I knew what I saw on vacation last week had to be a part of a bigger trend
Retirement and tourist hot spots are getting to the point where the workers for shops can't afford to live anywhere close so move to another city entirely so the shops are running on minimal hours or random hours
Some of them there just literally aren't any houses or apartments available for rent, they're all second or third homes or AirBnBs
This is what was happening with the town in Canada where retirees were volunteering for local businesses that I posted a few days ago too
I thought it was just the shops not willing to pay enough but apparently in some of these tourist towns unless you can afford to buy a house at Bay Area prices you don't get to live there
I meany technically that dude is part of the problem
I'll bet 10 bucks he stayed in an Airbnb ^^
They're kind of fucked, if they raise prices enough for their workers to get paid enough to actually live in the town they'll kill the tourism
Probably 😛
why would it kill the tourism?
If a cup of coffee costs $25 and a meal costs $100 you're going to lose the casual tourists
"Tourism" like the normal people tourism, where they try to get the best bang for the buck.
These are situations where I would expect city gov to step in and build affordable housing to solve this problem for the community
Yeah, or get more aggressive about taxing investment homes and banning AirBnBs
The city needs to invest, because else tourism will fade away no matter what
Yeah, if the shops can't stay open tourism will die out too
Oh that tourism
We had a kind of meh time on vacation because places were closed or short staffed so things took forever
This is a typical situation where the market failed to regulate itself and gov needs to step in
We didn't even go to one of the restaurants we always eat at when on vacation, it was always either closed or packed and had signs up asking for patience for waiters due to staffing shortages
So they couldn't even get 1 whole shift staffed, let alone enough to stay open all day
That's so interesting, I never heard about anything like this around here
My right wingers in my family kept blaming it on COVID unemployment checks
Even though those were only $300 extra and our state stopped doing them anyway
"they're just lazy" is what I hear a lot.
The city might be just as lazy/corrupt as ours in that regard. At least we got some new housing build, but they made a bunch of bad decisions that don't make any sense in the long run.
For example, the new houses/blocks use wood/pallet fueled boilers... despite the location having access to hot water, cheap electricity and even a natural gas network. Official reason: "It's better for the environment."
Rossmann was apparently getting a lot of people asking to work for him off the books so that they could keep unemployment or basically they'd just rather stay home and keep getting paid
it is multi-factored as all heck, however
We even went as far to fuck over tourism as much as possible. Just to make 100% sure, that no one ever visits.
One person said [approximately] "they should just suck it up and take the low paying job!" which was... interesting.
Like, the service industry is one of those industries which has been screwed for a long ass time, which, like, eeerrrr...
I think COVID just pushed this forward a lot so it happened all at once
low paying jobs make a sense to dive for if there is a promise of actually earning more in the future, but, many of these industries which are suffering this heavily where churn factories anyways
Who gives a shit if you underpay your staff and they quit in 2 months, theres always a line for the jobs
but, covid uno reversed that shit
People didn't have work in tourist towns so had to move to find work, investors bought up the houses and such left behind, now there is nowhere for people to live even if they wanted to take those jobs
Or... the businesses could just offer a living wage to start? 🤔
I'd totally work retail for years and years if it paid enough
Do programming on the side and make enough on a low stress retail job? Hell yea
Service is mostly ran by students I think
Well, living wage is complex when rent is inflated to all shit in many of these areas
But since we have a fair minimum wage, plenty of other people.work in service too
Like, living wage 100% makes sense but when you're paying 2.5k a month for rent, holy fuck
Where I worked it was yea, college students or older people
Affordable housing in tourist towns has always been hard for service industry folks but people were willing to spend a few years cramming into a cheap apartment with too many roommates for a chance to live on the beach or ski slopes or whatever
Now those apartments don't even exist
I'm sure the libertarian invisible hand has a solution that... no! Stop it! Bad hand! Stop trying to hire 10 year olds at 2 dollars of company scrip a day!
“There’s a joke going around: you either have three houses in Ketchum or three jobs,”
The towns solution is to set up a tent city in a local park
“We are a small town,” Bradshaw said. “We have seen over the last year, an influx of more people moving to our town due to COVID. COVID has taken what was probably going to happen in 15 years and accelerated it into 15 months.”
Oh god
Late stage capitalism, ppl getting forced out of their homes cause some guy in a suit wants to have some nice country side views for two weeks of the year
My cousin had a house bought out he was renting, he was working with the landlord on doing renovations to take off some of the rent and saving up to be able to buy the house from the guy
I mean, am not even sure it's purely capitalism, it's often just blatent corruption + moronity
the demand for housing is often too strong so landlords, etc, can get away with stupidly raising rent and often building new houses is a literal nightmare
Like, there is a guy who wanted to turn his laundrette into a block of flats and he literally spent like a million or something just battling their local government and anti, I forgot the word, anti whites moving into my neighbourhood peeps
So, an area which was sufering with high rents due to a local boom in the market due to tech industries being near by, wanted government to force rents down, stop people creating new builds, etc
In these times of National shortage, all future political and electoral leaflets will have to be printed on soft paper so that they may be recycled in the appropriate manner.
#Manicfesto #NationalToiletPaperDay
Looks like a suicide bomber attack outside the airport in Kabul
Pentagon hasn't confirmed it but reporting is 4 US Marines killed, Taliban says 13 dead over all
Oh, that 13 is outdated, seeing reports of 40 fatalities now
Or maybe that 13 was just Taliban fighters?
12 us service members, at least 60 afghans killed in the 2 attacks
Harsh but true https://twitter.com/MalcolmNance/status/1430920972178178062
20 YEARS- FYI there have been terrorist suicide bombers killing civilians nearly DAILY in Afghanistan. This ain’t new. It’s why we are leaving. #DealWithIt
4620
15578
Definitely not the right way to say that though
well, the civilian deaths aren't going to be the problem for biden admin
that hasn't happened daily
last death was february 2020 iirc
and that was one death, this was 12
You mean US troop deaths?
yeah
Well, yeah, we care about that more
Apparently some of the protections against bombings like this have been torn down by the Taliban
Although I think those are for car bombs?
yeah... that argument isn't going to fly. "The taliban didnt do a good enough job with their checkpoints". And it shouldn't, thats absurd, relying on the taliban to do security?
I mean, we negotiated with them last year to take over the country
Then thought the guys we were selling out would protect us on our way out the door
Probably should have made Bagram our evacuation point instead of the Kabul airport though
yeah, I'm seeing a lot of that going around
Would have made it harder to get people to the base though
well if there was a plan in place, that issue could've been aliviated
biden said they planned for this outcome, yeah right
We had an agreement to keep running and securing the airport for a year though so I can see why that would be the place, we were planning to stay for a while
I was surprised to see this post, figured he would be piling on https://twitter.com/WalshFreedom/status/1430663801649700872
Biden didn’t lose the war. Biden is finally getting us out of a war that we lost a long, long time ago.
5525
39419
Seems like he has been repeating similar things for a while
oh I'm glad we are getting out for sure. when this started, I didnt care how, I now very much do care how we leave, and this doesn't look to be going well at all
Since March of this year, the State Department has sent 19 messages to Americans in Afghanistan telling them to leave. Warning them. Offering to pay for them to leave.
8092
24852
Blinken now says the number of Americans who want to be evacuated is definitively 500, with 1,000 others they are trying to ascertain their status, though numbers are hard to pin down. https://t.co/PlNyoFD8TH
101
389
I have no idea who the Americans were, the soldiers certainly were ordered to be there, and the civilians might have been helping out, or embassy personnel or who knows what. Really don’t appreciate what he’s trying to suggest. That they didn’t listen, and so they are to blame
There were over 10,000 US civilians there a week or two ago
Looks like the March thing was a mixup with a message in 2020 about covid, the first messages were actually in April
Looks like most of the staff at the embassy were locals, although we'd want to try to get them out too
Trying to find numbers
They were trying to get as many embassy workers as possible to leave in April too
If their work could be done remotely or was no longer needed they were ordered to leave
the majority of the 80,000 the biden admin said they wanted to get out couldn't just come to the US on their own, they don't have citizenship, so they are relying on the US to get them in.
On August 7th the embassy told all Americans to get out of the country, that was a week before Taliban took over
Embassy at that time had 4,000 employees, 1,400 of which were US citizens
yeah ok, and they should've heeded that first warning. the people who actually could just return to the US with their passport
Biden is taking questions, wow
about time
There are a lot of black sun things on Amazon, sadly
And after looking that up Amazon is going to start recommending them to me... fuck
Thankfully they let you delete items off the view history to avoid this
Were they about to get ruled against or smth? https://apple.news/AJ1idc-wWQ4uEFh2TRbdYfQ
Who knows, maybe it’ll be for only small devs again, idk
SCOTUS struck down the eviction moratorium thankfully
To clarify, they struck down the CDCs moratorium, if the legislature actually does something, that’ll be fine
was a matter of time
Biden admin tried to add some new terms in the new one to get around the ruling from the other one
This is the crap I hate the media for… “…despite threat posed by surging delta variant”
Yeah. Headline should be blaming congress for not acting. 😦
That’s their job! Creating laws, saying what agency can do what.
We live on a country of laws, and they have to be followed, and if they are wrong, changed
Was very disappointed the Biden admin caved and re-upped the moratorium in the first place
Congress did pass one before, right? The CDC just unilaterally extended it after that one expired?
you might be right, idk for sure tho
yeah, I think congress passed on under Trump even
yeah, looks like congress extended their own on Dec 22, 2020
yeah the problem was they never gave the cdc the power (or president) to extend it
Historically things like this from Apple have been tied up with so much red tape that they're just a token gesture to reduce the chances of a successful anti-trust suit.
Well, in my personal assessment of them.
You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y'all. Stop it. https://t.co/TWb75xYEY4
46248
103826
US FDA thinks they're Wendys or something 😛
Interesting, I expected this to happen, but by order, not by a proposed settlement, and especially not for that case, but the epic case (even tho I don't think epic would ever settle)
that's probably the only thing that would have even come out of that case
now that they did that on their own i doubt that lawsuit will get anything now
Apple clearly fears they getting ordered to allow sideloading
i mean that'd be a pretty bad ruling yeah
When do we expect the ruling?
Google wasn't helpful
Ah wikipedia just says later this year
iirc she made a joke saying by Aug 13th
(a year from when they were removed from the store)
Since we on that topic, I just saw this tweet, lol
That's standard for a class action kind of thing
That's part of the proposed settlement in the sample dev case
and thats just a settlement
I guess they just took the money and are happy?
Cause like, other than that, not much is in that settlement
A measured response https://twitter.com/nycmayor/status/1431080244497235970?s=21
A group of right wing extremists just decided to throw families out of their homes during a global pandemic.
This is an attack on working people across our country and city. New York won’t stand for this vile, unjust decision. https://t.co/Tw6Bt97GC9
342
Yeah, saw that, yikes
Also this phrase is confusing to me, isn't a pandemic global by definition?
Idk, it might be fine with a region attached. Not really the main story there tho 😛
Can’t call everyone right wing extremists because then it doesn’t mean anything.
right wing extremists
I mean, it's shitty as all fuck to throw people out, many are behind rent not of their own accord
But, this is the governments doing by not supporting individuals and just expecting land lords to take the hit
if the government was willing to pay for those behind, sure, go ahead
Apparently like 80% of the funding for that hasn't been spent
Or, even, just requiring relief of morgate payments, etc, for those who are landlords
Contrary to popular belief, most people renting out houses are not rich people and often have it as a retirement fund more or less, the houses often barely pay much more than what the mortgage payments are
Googling some numbers real quick suggests about half of rental properties in the US are owned by "mom and pop" landlords
Yea, the market splitis generally there as many orgs basically just gobble up houses for large scale renting, I'd imagine the property split is 50:50 but the landlord split is probs more heavily towards most being "mom and pop"
Issue I generally see here is that they've protected tenants but offered basically 0 protection for landlords or even home owners as such
if the bank owns the house, you're still expected and required to be paying the bank, there is no safety there; and that would do a huge thing to help level the playing field imho
There was a ban on most foreclosures too, iirc
But I think that might have run out in December?
I think so?
I mean, I kinda remember there being something on foreclosures but it was sorta like, not exactly well stated and no idea if banks respected it all too well
The thread has more stuff from that group
lmfaooooooo
It’s #WormingWednesday y’all! Just rub some Ivermectin on your arm, because Russel said so! 😂 https://t.co/lZKNedSvdp
719
worming wednesday...
hmm there are people in these groups giving it to their kids too
i think that's enough twitter with facebook screenshots for me
If you're gonna take shit meant for horses just do ketamine like the rest of us
Good ol' Special-K
yes, because horse meds = good, vaccine = bad
there isn't enough ivermectin in the world to treat the brain worms
Holy shit people or dum
Does this shit at least make them unable to reproduce or some nice side effects like that?
People think the uncontrollable diarrhea is a sign they actually had parasites and not just a side effect that's probably even worse because they overdosed
Same with the dizziness that is a definite sign they overdosed
And then after a few days or weeks their body adjusts to the torture they're putting it through and they keep overdosing daily thinking they must be better now
In a late Friday night blow to Uber, Lyft and other gig worker-centered companies, a superior court judge ruled that California’s Proposition 22, which was passed in 2020 and designed to overrule the state’s controversial AB-5 law on the employment status of gig workers, violates the state’s consti…
shame
those seemed like a good compromise for what is obviously an independent contractor
people dont want it to be an independent contractor anymore tho
then don't take the job
choice is a luxury
Some do though?
idk
you 100% have a choice
Some people want the will to be able to go gig around in bars and shit
fucking doordash isn't the only option
stuff works different here, and yes cat, theres a different between the dude that only does it like on friday nights, and the dude that does it ufll time
you pick a gig-based job because it doesn't have set hours
The fact that companies need an exception to a regulation often implies that it's a shit regulation
giving them employee protections for something that clearly isn't one
theres a different between the dude that only does it like on friday nights, and the dude that does it ufll time
But, the regulation offers 0 ambiguation between that?
Thus, that statement is stupid
Prop 22 was set to help the latter
which is not a bad policy imo
but California itself wanted to abolish the independent contractor distinction itself for uber/doordash types
which is really fuckin weird
Their original proposals more focused on independent contracting as a whole
they basically wanted to make it so as an independent contractor, even if you where only there for 5 minutes, you had to be fully covered, etc, etc
yeah drawing an imaginary line in the sand banning a type of relationship is so fucking weird
its the backwards way to fix a problem
The whole thing just basically shat on independent contractors in the names of helping them all for the name of fucking over uber/doordash
it would likely end up hurting consumers more too
Gig workers are closer to employees than independent contractors, I think
Although the local cab company also has their drivers as independent contractors which is even more absurd because they have set hours
The company just calls it the hours they're allowed to rent the car I think but if you don't show up you get "fired"
see that is something i would more agree giving them employee status
but gig workers can stop working at any time
they don't have to work for months
The issue was iirc was that the original regs basically impacted people who go to play in pubs on saturday night, etc
it's very far from a employee
live bands which roam around from venue to venue, etc
The bill was far too wide on what it considered and basically practically screwed over a lot of non-uber/doordash peeps who where mostly there to have fun and such, rather than wanting to deal with an over-stipulative agreement
Every time I've asked a Lyft or Uber driver about it they're driving as a full time job
And usually have three phones so they can do Uber, Lyft, and personal stuff at the same time
My question is is why should the war against uber affect the kids who play in the pub on the weekend?
Because you couldn't do Uber if you did Lyft and vice versa
The law might have been sloppy/broad but it was doing something useful
Prop 22 blocked all of it
Actually it's worse than that, Prop 22 only overruled the law for Uber/Lyft drivers and left the indie band with the rules you're arguing against
But presumably the bar hiring your band could easily argue you aren't an employee since their business is selling alcohol, not performing music
it was my understanding prop 22;
- gave a health insurance voucher for those working 15 or more hours/week
- discrimination stuff
- over 100% of minimum wage for hours spent with a passenger
iirc it also had some credit for expenses per mile?
idk if that was in the final version
Yeah but you can't be logged in waiting for multiple apps and then just turn down drives from the others if you already got one
So the waiting time is just down time where you don't get anything
hmm i don't like banning use of competitors
that gets in the zone of employee land
but still i would make that clear cut
I mean, they're defo a shitty set of companies, but, like, the wide ass strike was just moronic
120% minimum wage for each hour they have a passenger or are en route to one, $0.30/mile with passenger or en route, health insurance stipend if you drive more than 15 hours a week, injuries while with a passenger or en route are paid for, and some training and discrimination stuff
some law saying independent contractors cannot have non-compete or whatever
They don't explicitly ban working with competitors afaik they just ban you or give you less drives if you skip too many offers
So they effectively ban working with competitors
Do you get paid for sitting waiting for the "clock"?
No
which makes sense
because people could just sit in their car all day
not taking any rides
If they got paid for sitting idle they'd definitely be employees
But then they'd also not be allowed to skip offers
well not necessarily
Yea, I mean, if they got paid for sitting idle I could see booting them for doing fuck all
otherwise it's very, eer...
Blocking them from skipping offers and also not paying them for their waiting time puts them in a worst of both worlds situation
not allowing them to skip would likely be an employee imo yes
I understand why they effectively block skipping though, it makes scheduling and surge pricing and such way simpler to figure out
yeah, i mean you don't want your network to say "cars nearby" but the one car there keeps skipping everything
But that doesn't change the fact that it makes them exclusive to your company
I mean, the way uber and such operate is pretty fucking shitty and I'd love to see better protections against such companies, I wouldn't want to see them go as they offer a huge safety net for some people, e.g. I know somebody in the states who does one of the apps with everything going on and she likes it fairly well for what it pays, bar shitty customers, but, I dont see why the fight against uber needs to also impact those who go gig
Which should make them employees
The fact that so many people supported a bill which override AB5 really just shows how shitty prop22 was
ehhh, couldn't you clock out when you take one ride from one app
why keep all apps always on
If you get offers from them before you clock out it's the same thing
I do question the numbers of people who supported prop 22, as I recall a lot of musicians and such supporting it
I think it was a level of "this doesn't exactly help us but sets the stepping stones" or something stupid
It got 58% of the vote with basically every group but labor unions supporting it
And something like 10x as much campaign funds
maybe it's a brit thing but I know labour unions in the UK are somewhat dying
Don't think dying all that fast though, but, er...
Some of the companies also forced their workers to support and promote the legislation: Uber sent its drivers in-app messages forcing them to click on either "Yes on Prop 22" or "OK", Instacart ordered its workers to place pro-Prop 22 stickers in customers' shopping bags, and DoorDash forced delivery drivers to use bags saying "Yes on 22".
lol
oof
is stupidity genetic? or random? is there a stupid gene? o_O
this kinda of stupidity isn't generic, but you pass it on while raising your kids
Tell me that your education system is failing without telling me that your education system is failing, I'll go first...
I mean, its not that bad
plenty kids getting vaccinated against their parents will
am actually not sure what the age barrier is when they no longer need consent 🤔
Pretty sure its 16 here in NL
Here in biology classes there's quite a bit of emphasis on how the body functions deep down and not just on a general level. RNA (for RNA vaccines) is also taught quite in-depth (how does DNA move through your cells, how does it turn to RNA, what happens to it, etc.), so it's not surprising that younger people are more willing to get vaccinated. From what I heard from my parents, they would stop at "your body has cells" back then, so older people being misinformed about how vaccinations actually function is not unexpected.
(We actually had to know the specific atomic structure of DNA in biology classes - can't say I liked it, though.)
are you in the US?
No
I didn't take any biology classes in higher grades cause it was so boring 😄
but I know we tech that shit here too
but teenagers are generally better at critical thinking
Should've dropped it too, considering my grades, but I didn't want geography and history either, so...
I took geography and had to take basically a filler course of history for a year
geography was fun cause we also did economic stuff
stuff like urban development too
just generally felt more useful than biology which is this highly technical shit
same with chemistry, didn't take that, I had physics, which seems more applicable in day to day
I dropped geography, history and French, but still had maths, higher maths, economics, physics, chemistry, Dutch, English, German, economics and biology.
Only real classes I was good at were maths, everything else was not much more than a pass.
I actually kinda liked chemistry, although guess what we also got there... the atomic structure of DNA. Fun.
I had german, english, music, the history course, geography, social studies (focus), maths (other focus), physics, IT, religion and sport
in germany religion or ethics is mandatory, dont @ me
Well, sport, religion (called differently, focuses more on your own development), arts and social studies are all mandatory, so had that too.
Music as well, but that's only in lower grades.
Yeah, can't do that here. And music was extremely boring, you weren't actually playing an instrument, or even singing or smth, you were only learning about the history of music, fucking boring
maths, science, english and PE where manditory, I did Design and Tech vs food tech, materials (aka, sewing), IT instead of geography I think it was, and media studies instead of history lol
Well, PE was mandatory but taking it as a course was not
music really depends on the teacher
It depends on which "level" you do your high school at, the "highest level" only gets this theory bs, whereas lower ones actually like play on a keyboard or smth
I think these levels are the same in the German ed. system, but don't know the names anymore
yeah, we has keyboard stuff
or even simple note reading
which is aced cause I had lessons for 10 years, lmao
I can read notes, but not because of music class
If you mean fluently as in while playing an instrument, yeah, me neither, but if you give me a piece of sheet music I can figure out what stuff means
I've been debating on buying like a cheapish guitar
My birth giver said that I could learn piano when she cancelled our swimming lessons and such but it never happened
you could give me a sheet of notes and I could play it imitatively
not fast nor perfect
but I could play it
now I have to go bar by bar, hand by hand
man, just looked at my grates
I don't remember being so bad at sports, lmao
10/15 points, where 4 is passed
german was my worst, 8/15
overall 630 out of 900, where 300 is passed
Sports was graded on a "bad", "good", "great" scale, and I got a great for basically doing nothing
But sports here is also based on how well you engage in the activities, so if you pretend to do stuff you won't fail.
but my oral german exam at the end was 3/15 cause I didnt give a shit anymore, already signed a job, and had a flight to mallocra booked for the next day 😂
if I had something decent there it would have been 700/900, but oh well
I got a D in media studies and english lit, Forgot that I took lit instead of core english as I'd already passed english itself so we where basically pushed on to doing english lit; We also did maths early on the easier test which tops out at a C so that we could do the test which lets you get an A+, we where crammed af but I still managed to get a B
better than my sister, so thats all that counts
yeah overall this is a B for me too I guess
I was basically a "pass" student all across the board, academics was really not my thing and had the typical issues a shitty upbringing gives
Not to mention when the grading started mattering the teacher who actually got me interested in science broke her ankle or something and left, so we lovingly got some complete utter arse of a woman instead
I was a, do just enough to get a B student, basically my whole live
all my school reports, ever since we had grates, had like a B on average
and always like, almost everything B, but in german and english a C, but an A in maths and some other science thing
My grades were generally a pass except math which was pretty good. Now in uni I'm doing much better, though.
Uni was horrible 😂
anythin practical I generally did good in
anything theoretical or involving a ton of writing I did shit in
Failed all math exams, finished them after multiple tries with what would be a D I guess? But was good in the IT stuff and got As and Bs so it avaraged out at a bad B again
I'm generally better at the theoretical stuff. Databases are scary, but now we treat them as tuples and everything is a set and now it's actually fun.
(And no, that's not a joke, I'm generally worse at something when it becomes too concrete.)
I like doing stuff, and I like learning theory and shit, but, my brains understanding of stuff can be hard to click at times, and writing stuff down is pretty much not my thing
My english skills have always kinda sucked, I just really suck at understanding the rules and all the exceptions, etc
I'm kinda the opposite, precise reading is more my thing, so it's easier for me if you give me a dry textbook with precise defintions than if you give me an example or let me try me own thing.
Oh god I hated that shit in databases
Thankfully my databases exam was a 130% exams, which 100% maximum, so you basically could choose if you did the theoretical one, or the practical task
I enjoyed the programming exams (on PC) the most, cause I could just wack something together
practical DB coursework I had was probs one of the easiest I did throughout uni
Well, next to the basic datatypes shit test I did at the beginning of first year
I 100%'d that biatch
The c++ exam literally was my prof giving me a VM, allowing me to install whatever and put whatever documentation on. He would cut the internet for the exam so we don't communicate, give us tasks with header files and unit tests, and we could just hack away
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/covid-us-hospital-icu-bed-shortage-veteran-dies-treatable-illness/ does something like this get added to the covid deaths?
he didn't die of covid, but he died because of covid
That's the kind of stuff that makes people say you should look at excess deaths for a more correct measurement of the harm covid caused
ah ok
didn't really think about it, but i guess i don't want to end up in a hospital right now
That's a part of why TikTok is banning videos of that stupid milk crate challenge
Don't need people in the hospital from stupid shit like that right now
The statistics track neither of those, they track die with covid. As in, the outcome. If some get it, and then jump from a bridge, your covid outcome is deadly as far as the statistic is concerned.
That's not how it works in the US
In the US on your death certificate they're supposed to put all the contributing factors to your death
covid isn't a contributing factor for jumping off a bridge
And that is used for the statistics?
Yeah
Yes, cause of death is recorded here too, but not for the statistics
There we just track outcome, you either died, or don't have it anymore
They track the underlying cause(s) of death and that's what the CDC and such report
In 2020 covid was an underlying cause of death for 345,323 deaths in the US
There was I think one case where covid was listed for a car accident or something but that's not normal
That might have just been a Fox News talking point though, not finding any proof
They were trying to claim it worked like you said where anyone who died for any reason while testing positive for covid was counted as a covid death
Of course since testing has been so spotty even if that was how we reported things we'd still likely be undercounting since they didn't usually bother to test dead people
it's not a coronavirus death but a coronavirus related death yeah
Its not modern politics, but its interesting to look at ww2 from Germanys side
wut
Reportedly, Fortnite has disabled almost all emotes for their MLK event... one that is still enabled stands out. Epic Games has a deal with DC for Wonder Woman so her emote remains...
Her emote is cracking a whip.
Jesus christ. Who thought this event was a smart idea...? https://t.co/OO8Gm6KirC
101
859
Oh god
How did this event get approved
took me a while to make the connection to slavery
The event was yikes too
At protest in Santa Monica today before the vote on mask-mandate, Jason Lefkowitz has the home addresses of each LA City Council member on his sign. He says they are going to the homes of whoever votes for it, and if it passes, it’s “civil war, get your guns.” From @chadloder https://t.co/QICGpuT2sc
253
451

Not really politics but I feel like any commentary on it would quickly be
https://twitter.com/PhilosophyTube/status/1432026315536965642
Imagine being misogynistic
It's also 3 hours per week iirc
Under 18 are allowed to play only between 8pm to 9pm on Friday, Saturday, Sunday. Public holidays are counted as weekend (only 8pm to 9pm).
yeah
Saw a comment along the lines of "great way to piss of a whole generation and make them rebel against the CCP" but sadly, I don't see that happening
The authorities in #China have today announced that for, anyone under 18 years old, they're to be limited to playing online games to only 3 hours a week! Plus only these 3 hours: 8 til 9 pm on Friday, Saturday and Sunday. There will be Chinese teenagers flipping out right now!
996
1949
This was where I found out
Threat, has some more info
At least one parent of a teenager working in our office actually cheered out aloud at this news when we heard it. You still can't wipe the smile off her face. ;-)
201
This is why I doubt anybody in china cares
The people generally like what the CCP is doing
They have such a different way of life and such different priorities, it's impossible for us understand
I guess like comparable to the fact that I will never understand the American gun laws
Lol, was just coming in to post about chinas 3 hour limit
League community be like, thank God for this new balance patch, aligning the LPL with the other regions
😂 😂
(LPL is the chinease league)
How would they enforce that
Read the thread
But basically, require game companies to enforce it, by ID, and block access to foreign games using the great firewall
👎
American here. I don't get it either.
I wonder how expensive the great firewall costs to maintain
It's free
ISPs enforce it or they don't get to be ISPs
Government doesn't actually run it afaik
Firewall of Cisco.
when i was growing up, we had a rule where we could only use the computer for half an hour, at a specific time of the day
can't imagine a government would enforce something like this
I know someone else whose parents did that as well - not sure what the exact time span was, but same idea. Luckily I never had that myself.
my parents only allowed me 15 minutes on the ipad, but 30 minutes behind the computer
I wonder why these numbers are all over the place https://www.healthline.com/health-news/heres-how-well-covid-19-vaccines-work-against-the-delta-variant#Vaccines-vs.-Delta-variant
In the fight against the delta variant, here is how the Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccines measure up when it comes to protection. A new study found the Moderna vaccine was 76% effective against the Delta variant, while the Pfizer vaccine was only 42% effective against the variant in July.
Israel and US studies suggest the vaccines are pretty bad against infection from Delta (although still really good at preventing symptomatic infections and hospitalization) but all the others say they're either only a little less effective or no change
The majority of the studies say the vaccines aren't too good at preventing infection with Delta though so that seems to be the consensus so far
That’s all that really matters…. Preventing hospitalization and death. Idc if I’m sick for a few days or a week, I’ve been sick before for that long.
So true
In other news
Erdogan has sued 38,581 people over the past 6 years for being offended. Let that sink in
183
If it is or isn't doesn't even matter
The fact you can't be sure explains better than everything else the state of society
There is a non zero chance somebody could actually say that with a straight face
One of the largest trials studying ivermectin for Covid-19 treatment, called the Together Trial, was halted by the data safety monitoring board on Aug. 6 because the drug had been shown to be no better than a placebo at preventing hospitalization or prolonged stay in the emergency room. Dr. Edward Mills, a professor at McMaster University who led the study, which enrolled more than 1,300 patients, said the team would have discontinued it earlier were it not for the level of public interest in ivermectin.
my parents would like give me 1.3 mins daily if i was lucky 
We had no real limits bar bed time and homework, my parents where pretty absent however, so, like, not like there was much else; my brothers went out a good fair bit as they got older but, er, sorta started associating with the wrong people and such
The limits that china is doing, er, I mean, a lot of people actually support it over there, especially given things like the laying down movement, there is a lot of stuff going on there, and apparently many people have stories of "losing" family members to gaming
apparently some 14 year old girl went missing
they found her years later in an internet cafe
(Found that one off Naomi Wu, who also basically told that there is a lot of support for it given stuff like ^)
Without knowing too many Chinese people, I can see how they are more susceptible to gaming addiction like that, it's still a really drastic measure
i think it was just me with strict limits, my little sister sould do anything she wanted
drastic times call for drastic measures, I guess
I disagree with it and it sucks, but, it's not exactly something without any support
especially given that it's a growing issue and game devs are only making games much more addictive
Everything the CCP does is with support
Also, it's pretty much primarily linked to online games, single player and campaign games, etc, are all currently fair play, apparently
i do wish they actually did a bit more to cull the addictiveness of online gaming
it's like they've successfully noticed a problem (video games can be unhealthily addicting) and just decided to prevent the gaming part rather than the addicting part
it's like the easy way out
Yeeaah, exactly
And fail to see the advantages
Should we count the amount of people in here which found a job thanks to a youth of gaming?
online gaming*
and, china has a real massive societal issue here, it's heavy handed af but I can understand why they're restricting online games, as always there are ways around it but that's mostly on the parents to decide
at least imho, this is basically china's prohibition
I think its sto incredibly stupid that Global warming has got this far, like we have all the solutions already but politicians just wont use them because of their bottom line
well
really
the market has failed us
and only then you can blame the politicians for not better regulating the market
the markets have a fundamental problem: they only care about short term profits
Like how the market as in oil companies and companies that use the oil and non recyclable materials?
thats a part, ye
even all of the reports say that the stuff required to be net 0 by 2050 is still in progress
recylcing is already done but also convoluted as all fuck
there are a bunch
nuclear reactors are held back heavily by NIMBYers
sorry biodegradable plastics, the plant based ones
biodegradable plastics afaik aren't super perfect yet either and stupidly convoluted
many "biodegradable" plastics really aren't
Like, some places actually forbid you from placing biodegradable plastics in your compost because of that
The ""Biodegradable" plastics made by oil ya is not biodegradable because they just turn into smaller plastics, but the ones made from sea weed and plants do, and even if their not perfect its still something
it's not something if they don't actually biodegrade
using plastics for stuff is really not an issue afaik
Im saying plant ones do biodegrade, but not the oil based "Biodegradable"
This is just my opinion, but I think that even though these things like Traveling wave nuclear reactors and Plant based plastics are not the greatest, their our only chance against global warming, and we can further improve them aswell
The thing is that a lot of this stuff is still early days and who knows if it will actually get there fully
many "green" alternatives which are highly touted sometimes even have their own dangerously negative affects
But alot of them we already have figured out
"figured out" but still many years from being a commercial viability
Like with traveling wave nuclear reactors we had done all the research but had to stop because of the trade war
They could power the U.S. for the next 100 years with our nuclear waste laying around
issue with nuclear is that you're ironically going to have to fight a lot of greenpeace types
And there are ones that are not ready to be used or are not economically the best but we have to do something
I love nuclear and think that it's one of the best solutions we have, but, t'is gonna be fun
Yes, but saying that we have the solutions right now is just stupid
reminds me of the time mcdonalds replaced their straws with paper ones
only to find out that they coated them with a material which made them unable to be recycled
They did that, I thought Macdonalds would never lol
or apple having replaced their cables with a different type of plastic which was "environmentally friendly" which means that people throw out cables every year or two because they literally disintergrate
Cool, the material is greener, but, now you're actually having more of an ecological impact because now you're having to make much more of the product in question
I hope they start doing something more pretty quick, I dont feel like spending the rest of my life on this earth with the way they describe what its going to be like
What i am about to write is very long
XD sorry Have to do it in parts
These things are describing are contradictions of capitalism are inherent in the system itself: Capitalist competition inevitably leads to crisis. These contradictions cannot be done away with within the bounds of the capitalist system. They occur independently, outside the will and control of the capitalists themselves. Capitalism is not a rational system.
In the the Second German Edition of Capital Marx wrote (January 24, 1873):
“The contradictions, inherent in the movement of the capitalist’s society, impress themselves upon the practical bourgeois most strikingly in the changes of the periodic cycle, through which modern industry runs and whose crowning point is the universal crisis.”
The central point is that, according to Marx, capitalism carries with its gradual progress all the potentialities of contradiction. So contradictions are inherent in every capitalist system. The capitalists leave no stone unturned to get rid of the contradictions, but there is no way out.
It has been maintained by Marx that the contradictions of capitalism have not come from outside, rather their seeds were within capitalism and the system is itself responsible. He has explained the capitalist system in the outlook of materialistic conception of history and has noted that, in the feudal system, property relations were incompatible with already developed productive forces.
The existing relations of production and property were converted into so many fetters and they had to burst asunder. Into their place stepped free competition, accompanied by a social and political constitution adapted to it, and by the economical and political sway of the bourgeois class.
The development of capitalism under the guidance of the bourgeoisie has surpassed all past records of social progress. In all fields such as transport, communication, commerce, and, finally, productive system and production relations, the development of capitalism is really miraculous. But this is the source of crisis and contradiction.
The development of capitalism is followed by the epidemic of over-production. Why? The capitalists, in order to earn more and more profit, produce more and more. On the contrary, the society is not well-equipped for the consumption.
so you pasted an entire article here
Citation is here If u want to use that
ADVERTISEMENTS: Read this article to learn about Contradiction in Capitalism: Origin, Nature, Evaluation and Criticism! Origin and Nature of Contradiction: In the Afterword to the Second German Edition of Capital Marx wrote (January 24, 1873): “The contradictions, inherent in the movement of the capitalist’s society, impress themselves upon the ...
Capitalism leads to over production in a nutshell,
ok so how do you fix that
sure
Why i think Capitalism leads to over production?
Oh well, that would depend on the state we are talking about.
you just described a problem, jroy wants to hear your thoughts on a potential solution
OH ok
Sorry about that
Well, depends on how we approach the problem of over production. there can be a # of ways to handle it. Idealy geting rid of waste would be #1 goal here
So, Rather then trowing away tons of Food lets say
We should take that food and donate it to charity/churches
Not all items can do this BUT most can
and capitalism is the system which allowed for there to be extra food in order to be able to have excesses to be able to hand out to those in need
Well, in the current state of afairs most of it is in landfills right?
there is defo waste, all systems have that when there is no direct demand to supply link
No?
Well
So what you're saying is true, but this isn't like something that is fixed that easy
outside of cases where they can't due to regulations, most supermarkets have agreements with food banks, etc, to donate excess goods
you can't just make only enough food for everyone, that's not possible
I mean, that's at least the case where I live last I knew
Bout 40% is just waste https://www.rts.com/resources/guides/food-waste-america/
and sending all excess to charity isn't logistically possible as well
most of that waste is people buying food and throwing it out
at least last I recall from the stats
Yes, So this is a simple thing people can do themselfs not trow out tons of food
yeah sure I agree
easier said than done
I wouldn't attribute it the economic system tho
and, for the most part, really not an issue
it's more a societal issue
40% waste is a big problem
last I knew, most of it was basically fruits and such
In fact, food is the single largest component taking up space inside US landfills,
be better to just toss it into a compost pile and send it back to nature
thing is that majority of food waste is actually "greens"
Wasteful over production is not great worse is ppl trow out the food
theres always gonna be a level of waste with stuff which isn't really distributable outside of the size it "naturally" comes in, you buy a bunch of banannas and you don't eat the full bunch in time, it's wasted
When we have mass homelessness and hunger
But it's not an overproduction
if it were overproduction, the people making the food would be the largest group chucking the food
there are vendors/people buying the food
They also do that
not in any large amounts
I think Pandemic they trew out god knows how much food
most of the closer to the source food waste I see is caused by the government
well sure
people overstocked
and it went bad
the pandemic fucked a lot of other things too
Oh for sure
people overstocked, there is also a lot of efficencies gained from going to say, the sandwich shop vs buying a lettuce and using 1/2 of it over a week or whatever
I like laws in place to prevent food waste and for ppl to care and try to avoid waste
well how would that law work
who would you enforce that on
and how would you enforce that
then try to gain support for reducing regulations which get in the way and to try to encourage supermarkets to donate more
Like in france I think wall mart has to donate left over stock that they did not sell that day
OR compost is a really good idea as well
that isn't a bad idea
Well, i mean the bread and canes etc that they are legit trowing away anyway
Can just be toss in a pin and pickd up but a local charity
Or mabe a big one
yeah I wouldn't be opposed to that
I am very sure they would be happy to get extra food
you could also put some tax credit to give them a good reason to donate food
yea why not
or just a tax on wasted non-perishable food
there are ways we can work on making the earth a better place
Ideal we want a post need/want but we cant get there if we do not get rid of waste
Sure>? but we can curb it
but, I mean, post need/want is complex
who produces the food? who creates the products which entertain?
humans have pretty much always worked on value
Oh well i mean I am a communist so i would like a workers state
https://twitter.com/axios/status/1432689282397900802?s=21
Wow, nearly every American renter doesn’t pay their rent?
For the first time since March 2020, nearly all American renters can now be evicted https://t.co/cydDCsNCz2
many people lost their sources of income, i believe that this time of the year at least for us who are close to like student age are prime for moving or lease renewal time, etc, etc
Oh I’m sure there are some people, maybe a lot, who can’t pay their rent. But nearly every American who is renting a living space?
a whole pool of shi is basically starting to head into a shitter
all american renters
I mean
It's not just people who haven't paid their rent
Hot housing market means that landlords have a strong will to increase your rent on renewal and such
I mean, I think that statement is a misnomer
I get a feeling they're tryna say that the protections put in place for nearly all renters are expiring
That is true. But you cant evict for no reason, at least where I live.
You have to, idk, not pay. And I don’t think nearly all renters aren’t paying
Well, no, many places have protections, but, the protections are expiring
That's not what they're saying
that phrasing is ass
They're basically saying that nearly all renters have lost the protections put in place
oh
ur phrasing is just as bad as theirs
I didn’t add anything…?
“Nearly all American renters can be evicted” just isn’t true
it's designed to be click-baity
If you pay, you can’t be evicted (barring some other violation of your agreement)
afaik just typical axios
part of why I really pissing hate news sites these days to the fact that I'm pretty sure I've hidden a good fair few on my news feed
it's just a total fucking plague of click bait and like, non-articles
right as I said that
The title and thumbnail play a huge role in a video's success or failure.
Check out http://kiwico.com/Veritasium50 for 50% off your first month of any subscription!
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Special thanks to Patreon supporters: Alvaro Naranjo, Burt Humburg, Blake Byers, Dumky, Mike Tung, Evgeny Skvortsov, Meekay, Ismail Öncü Usta, Paul Peijz...
unfortunate! it's a really good video lol
nothing, veritasium is just one of my favorite 'learning' channels
veritasium, tom scott, and smarter every day all great
smarter every day is such a great channel
indeed, the submarine videos were super cool
No idea if the article is unbiased, but damn: https://tutanota.com/blog/posts/australia-surveillance-bill/
The new Texas laws went into place today.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2021/sep/01/collector-buys-fake-banksy-nft-for-244000
"The incident undermines one of the things that make NFTs so attractive: the fact that they offer cryptographically secure authenticity. But the problem is that authenticity is dependent on the seller being who they say they are."
Lmao
cryptographically secure authenticity!
@thesheetztweetz They can shake their fist at the sky
271
3018
This one is also really interesting
If you have inter communication of sats, how do you regulate that?
Suddenly the internet is truly without borders
well you still need something on the group to recieve the connection right? aka the starlink dishes
that's probably harder to regulate
unless I'm missing something here
Yeah, you basically don't have a router for your landline, you got the starlink terminal
But you can buy that wherever, so good luck regulating that
I guess since it's sending and receiving signals, it falls under regulating for that, but stuff like ISP mandated url blocking is a nono
And like, how do you wanna geoblock, if SpaceX doesn't tell you the location of a user
What Netflix library do I get access to on starlink?
A part of me hopes that will be the end of geo blocking, but we all know the copyright mafia will never allow that
Starlink geofences their own users so they clearly have the capability
Refusing to do so sounds like a good way to get your signals jammed or get used for testing anti-satellite missiles
It's not hard to jam a satellite signal, doesn't take much power
Did you guys see the Bandemic on Reddit today?
They started banning the covid misinformation subreddits
So I hear that coat hanger abortions are back in style in Texas
What about the rat abortions?
Welcome to Balkan. Don't have a spare coat hanger and/or stairs? Time to apply the rat method.
I will never understand why the self proclaimed land of the free doesn't respect the freedom of self-determination over your own body
Because they don't recognize the 19th amendment.
It’s because the far-right firmly believes they’re above the law
If that goes against existing laws, you got courts for that, right?
