#politics
1 messages · Page 68 of 1
No they didn’t, trump ignored fauci
are you trolling
Why is China everything?
trump supporters need a good scapegoat
How does that have to do whith anything?
How else can you always be the victim?
If chinas or the us economy goes down, they both do
he stopped pipelines that weren't finished?
are you brain dead
tell me how that has anything to do with gas prices
The Ogallala Aquifer (oh-guh-LAH-lah) is a shallow water table aquifer surrounded by sand, silt, clay, and gravel located beneath the Great Plains in the United States. One of the world's largest aquifers, it underlies an area of approximately 174,000 sq mi (450,000 km2) in portions of eight states (South Dakota, Nebraska, Wyoming, Colorado, Kan...
Also how is getting oil from Canada being energy independent?
tell me how shutting down a non operational oil pipeline causes gas prices to increase
tell me how shutting down a non operational oil pipeline causes gas prices to increase
Did you just lump car mechanics in with the oil industry?
tell me how shutting down a non operational oil pipeline causes gas prices to increase
tell me how shutting down a non operational oil pipeline causes gas prices to increase
We should invest in nuclear power in my opinion instead of foccil fuels
I still don't understand why the Keystone XL pipeline couldn't just go another 100 miles east
man you're such a weasel
They insisted on going through the aquifer because it was the cheapest option
What had he done wrong?
still can't give any reason :(((
afaik we've mostly just been following trends from when Trump was in office
Gas prices and inflation are on the same path they were at the end of 2020
What source?
inflation is targeted for 2% each year and maintained by the fed
we haven't surpassed that
gas prices don't have shit to do with the president
Very powerful source"outside"
probably alex jones podcast
not even covid
The prices for a lot of things are kind of crazy right now due to the supply chain getting fucked sideways
Do you just blame biden for everything wrong?
We'll have to wait and see if they go back down or not
Some things are normal, some things got cheaper, some things got a little more expensive, some things are 10x the price and hard to find
because trump fucked it over
2020 gas and food were cheap because the demand went down
Trumps also anti LGBTQ soo he does NOT have my support...
2021 things are opening back up and demand is going up but the supply chain hasn't recovered yet
He banned Trans people from the millitary
waving a rainbow flag does not make you pro LGBTQ, your actions do
Trump was the first person to come out in support of LGBTQ+ in a presidential campaign
Which is interesting
I like how they forgot the S on the flag and had to try to squeeze it in
I never noticed that before
it looks like LGBT to the power S lol
Lol
!ban @stuck roost Transphobia, Please spread conspiracies elsewhere
:raised_hands: Banned Denyell#2004 (Transphobia, Please spread conspiracies elsewhere) [2 total infractions] -- Joshie#0001.

Rip
knew they'd say some dumb shit
Jroy, did you just have that ready just waiting for him to say that lol
yes
I suspect a lot of the prices that are fucked right now will never go back down, btw
and thats why you always check your sources
So CPI will go up whether the fed tries to control it or not
possibly
I think that every country needs to invest into Nuclear power
yeah it's pretty cool
Nuclear would have been a great investment 20 years ago
I don't know that it makes sense now
Improving battery tech should be a goal too
By the time you finish renewables will probably make it not worth turning on
Bill gates had a great design for a nuclear powerplant
Density mostly
before the trade war
Battery density is only needed for mobile/handheld devices
Doesn't matter if you need a warehouse sized battery for the grid, we have a lot of land
well I mean density will matter for vehicles
planes eventually but that may be a long whole
while*
I suppose you want denser than lead acid batteries but state of the art LiPo is already overkill for the grid
I don't think electric planes will ever be more than toys, we'll probably want to use some kind of biofuel or fuel made from carbon capture for that
Ah yeah, batteries for cars and lawnmowers and such need density too
renewables are still kind of not really there, most electric grids have maybe gotten around 15-20% renewable. most being coal/oil. Nuclear is nice but because people are scared that reactors blow up.
but my point of view with renewables: if the 4 mile wide hole is not in your back yard, you dont need to worry about it.
damn, all the spicy political messages got removed once he started using transphobia
My argument against nuclear is from an economic perspective, projections suggest in 20-30 years they won't make sense economically anymore and they'd have to run longer than that to be profitable (and hell, might take 20 years just to get operational)
Then you also have the fact that uranium isn't a renewable resource and with the reactor designs we use we go through it pretty quickly
If all our power was nuclear current known uranium would only last like 20-100 years iirc
Nuclear Fusion doesn't suffer from that problem.
You could go longer if you use designs that can also make weapons grade materials (they can use up more of the fuel) or if you raise electricity prices to cover the increased costs of processing uranium from less than ideal sources
I don't know if increased funding could actually get us to viable fusion faster but it's been 20 years away for 50 years now
But we need to get something other then coal/oil and quickly
Considering currently the state is much closer than 10 years ago I'd say so
They've managed sustained output from reactors, just yield issues really
Nuclear is also safer, and less pollution/ravioactivity
Oh yeah, fusion is safer than 3rd gen fission too.
This is where I got the idea for planes running on syngas from carbon capture, btw
The issue with wind and solar is they have downtime, it's just not possible to be a 100% replacement that is still renewable
Especially with the current grids
I think we just need to have enough renewable to buy us time so we dont destry the earth
and hopefully before oil runs out
Many takes on a carbon-neutral grid assume that periods of low solar and wind production will be smoothed over with gas generators using carbon capture and storage. But this analysis suggests that any remaining gas plants simply won't run often enough to provide an economic justification for the carbon-capture hardware.
Instead, gas plants will simply dump their carbon emissions into the sky. This ends up being carbon neutral because we'll still need some liquid fuels for things like air travel, and we'll make these with carbon pulled back out of the atmosphere, combined with hydrogen produced from water during periods of excess renewable supply.
This is for a zero emissions target, not a fully renewable one
Going entirely renewable actually forces much higher levels of carbon capture to ensure that fuel needs could be met without any fossil fuels. And going net negative involves a variety of carbon capture and biofuels, with substantial land use as a result of the latter.
thats a pretty smart idea
This is a "go wherever the numbers takes us" study instead of one where you set a goal like 100% solar/wind and then figure out what's needed to get there
It just also has a bunch of variants with different constraints on it like minimizing land use, fully renewable, net negative, etc
we only ban for violations of or community guidelines
including Transphobia, racism, etc
that guy was probably a troll anyway
there's no way you believe in good faith that china and dr. fauci collaborated to create the coronavirus lol
His emails would say otherwise but I'm not in this server for politics
yes, that is the point
congratulations, you discovered the entire point of having different channels for things
🤯
#freenode now just open discussion of white supremacy, ops doing nothing to stop it and refusing to answer questions about whether tolerating it is policy
110
That didn't take long
after voting to be a free and open space for people to talk?
i heard about that stuff
decentralized management
*free and open unless it's criticism of freenode management
Idk why ppl still follow the freenode crap
It was dead the second everybody left and the management went rouge
Sucks to loose it, but we gotta move on
cuz it's funny ngl
Does anyone here celebrate VE/VJ day, and what kind of stuff do you do to celebrate?
over in the UK i recall celebrating it in primary school but not much else
I remember talking about it in school but not really celebrate it
Yea, I recall celebrating it like once but I think it was an anniversary of it like the 50th
Mind explaining what VE/VJ is?
Oh we totally celebrate that in germany 😂
it's celebrated in the UK kinda mixed, I've not celebrated it in years or seen anybody experience it, but, apparently they do over here still
another excuse to drink all day? 😛
Tbh, all military holidays and stuff are dum
Outside of veterans and memorial day yes
Both aren't a thing here either
We only have the christian day where you celebrate the dead
Basically same thing, memorial day for remembering the fallen and veterans to appreciate the active duty
That's not a thing here, we don't give a shit about our military
We celebrate our military but gov don't really give a shit about them
We don't even give them money for proper equipment 😂
But, we seperate the military from the government as such
Well I mean no one actually does anything besides have a cook out usually anyways
We don't blame the military itself for going places the government sent them for example
But, we do respect them, especially the older generation as they're the reason we're still speaking english
I don't think the Nazis ever would have been able to invade the islands
If they did before trying to split their war with russia they probably would've just not easily
How is veteran's day for active duty? They aren't vets yet if they're active duty 😛
Every Sunday is worship the military day for like half the year, NFL games
Bad wording but veterans are all active and inactive military
You're right, we do use the day for things other than vets so the name doesn't make sense
But yeah, most of these are just excuses to get drunk and fire up the grill
Germany has the seventh best funded millitary in the world with 52.8 Billion or 1.4% GDP
most of that's probably maintaing old stock + forces
Voting? It was a takeover through legal force. 😄
And yet we got guns that can't shoot straight in the heat, helicopters that can't fly and tanks that can't drive
So yes, most of our military is just an unemployment programm for ppl we failed to integrate into our society
You must have alot of faith in your countries national defence
Unless they piss the US off they just have to be good enough to last until the US bombs the shit out of whoever attacked 😛
We probably have more bombs than they have bullets
And more debt lol
But Germany is pacifist, so I guess they dont need a strong military, and theres also the rest of nato
Is Germany generally left or right leaning?
Their center-right party is in charge but compared to the US they're pretty left leaning
Their center-right party probably lands somewhere in the middle of the Democrats 😛
Im used to Australia where pretty much everything is left leaning 😆
But When I moved(to America) its SOOO different
Is it? I was under the impression Australia was closer to the US as far as that goes
Australia is pretty left leaning, look at labor/liberal, there the parties in power https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_political_parties_in_Australia
The politics of Australia has a mild two-party system, with two dominant political groupings in the Australian political system, the Australian Labor Party and the Liberal/National Coalition. Federally, 6 of the 151 members of the lower house (Members of Parliament, or MPs) are not members of major parties, as are 15 of the 76 members of the upp...
There is also a No 5G party😆
Oh, I thought it was Liberal/National in charge
National has about 5 seats acoring to the wiki
Yeah but they're in the coalition that's in power, aren't they?
Plus that Liberal party looks like it's a combination of libertarians and neo-libs, not left leaning
they only have 16 mps tho
Doesn't matter, they get to have a say and Labor doesn't, if it works like other parliamentary systems
Which would make it a right-leaning government
idk, im just talking from my personal experiance
wdym, labor has a big say, they have 68 of the mps
then liberal with 60
Yeah but that only matters if Liberal/National can't get all their votes whipped
Otherwise those two combined can just pass whatever they want
but labor and liberal are the two in power, and they are both lefter leaning parties
Liberal is not a left leaning party
In some parts of Australia there isn't even a Liberal/National split, they joined together in one party
And Labor isn't in power, Liberal/National is
ok, well thats a different part from where I grew up in
Labor has a lot of seats so doing things at least some of them agree to makes it way easier to pass things but they aren't needed
The Liberal–National Coalition, commonly known simply as the Coalition, is an alliance of centre-right political parties that forms one of the two major groupings in Australian federal politics. The two partners in the Coalition are the Liberal Party of Australia and the National Party of Australia (the latter previously known as the Country Par...
That coalition has been the majority (in power) for the vast majority of the past 100 years
ya, im not saying that there not in power, im just saying Australia generally, or were I grew up is more left wing then America
I suppose if you came from Melbourne not many places in the US would look left leaning compared to that
im from Wa
That's probably similar to the coastal areas of Oregon and Washington though
Oh, yeah, Western is even more heavily Labor
I moved from like Wa Australia to a Republican town in the U.S., So there is a massive difference in politics
Yeah, yikes
So many conspiracy therists
I mean, just about any first world nation will feel somewhat left leaning compared to almost all of the US
Just because you would generally accept social safety nets, universal healthcare, and restrictions on gun ownership
If you talk about gun ownership here, they start going on about how there so unsafe and they need self defence
Well in my town at least
Since when do countries use their armies for defence? Last I checked our troops were wasting time and money in some shit hole countries
At least Germans are mostly on educational missions and train local police force
But still
A friend of mine once was part of the marine, stationed infront of somalia, they had to repair the motor of an Iranian slave trader with humans in cages on board because they signaled mayday and they didn't get permission by somalia to hold then accountable
He quit once he got back home :)
But you have to have an army, for a conflict like the Korean war, although they might not be the most productive rn
thats kinda messed up tho
Last I checked Korea is on the other side of the world
Not sure why I as an European should be concerned about Korea
But are we supposed to stand by and let North Korea invade the south?
I mean, by that logic, why do we let ppl drown in the Mediterranean?
Or die to hunger in africa?
Because polititions are idiots
Wars are just fueled by the industry behind it
Im just saying that you cannot just leave your country with no army and no defence
Official position by our army is that they aren't equipped to defend our country
Well hopefully it never comes to that
Meh can't find that quote
Gives a good idea tho
"German soldiers sometimes have to rely on civilian helicopters to transport them around in Afghanistan" That gives me alot of hope for the world
I thought Germany was Pasifist
as a country you're still expected to be able to defend yourself
The dum 20 year Afghanistan mission was only for training of locals
as well as the other sorta like groups of such
That was such a fucking waste of time and resources
"At the end of the year six out of six submarines were not in use. At times, not one of the 14 Airbus A-400M could fly"
Can't go to war if you don't have submarines or transport planes 
Lol
So the US has to big of a millitray for its budget and Germany has a crap millitary for its budget
As I said, our military is mostly an unemployment programm
And our government doesn't take care of our millitary
What countries are yall from
Why military is a waste of resources
How bad had covid hit Germany?
Average I assume?
We got a good healthcare system
oh ya healthcare is crap in the us
35k currently infected, not bad
You first have to Get an Affordable plan, then find a docter thats taking new patients, then see if your healthcare allows for that docter, where in Australia you can get any docter with your healthcare plan
Is that like Canadas?
And you automatically have healthcare
That sounds great
You still get to choose a company tho
And if you earn enough, you get to buy out of the universal system and use the fully private system
im guessing the private is better?
What are the gun ownership laws like there in Germany?
Tightly controlled of course
But there is like no desire to have one anyways
Unless you do it for sport or job
So a system that makes sence
You also have to account for peoples personal health. Like in america were generally much more obese and that is a huge part of infection and mortality rates
Well, we got a society that encourages good health, lol
MOAR MICS!!!
Comparing the systems of two countries like the usa and germany is difficult because of how different the people and culture is
Our culture is way older and more mature I guess
Plus we deal with our past way different
America is basically still traumatized by the whole independence war and stuff f
And still hasnt overcome slavery
???
Ok dude
We have a long way to overcome that last one
Europe peaked in the early 20th century
Australia/Europe has a murder rate of 0.95 per capita, the U.S. has one of 5-7, I feel alot safer in one
Australia/Europe also regulate gun ownership
There are two types of people in america. People who accept the sins of the past and want to move on and live their lives and treat people fairly. And there are people who want to shame others because of their skin color and make reparations for actions they have never committed
A piece of paper as the source for your rights = “more mature” ig
Mmh what do you mean by that?
Our constitution had way more revisions, we had the chance to redo it from scratch multiple times and learn from past mistakes
The US is still stuck with their initial draft
Venezuela has massive gun control and a monstrously high murder rate
Is that the bar america measures itself again? Fucking Venezuela?
that statistic is just a generalisation of the whole of Europe
The US's constitution is not made to change often to prevent party control over it
Yeah, I think it’s a good feature not a bug.
aren't some of the contries which have high gun ownership also some of the countries with less gun crime?
Just an example
It stops one party from controlling, but also stops new ideas
It's not really a gun issue, it's an inner city issue, afaik
Trade off of sorts
whats sad is that it prevents necesary changing with the times or additions that should be made from being made but yes party control is an issue
Very true
poor education, poor opportunities
new ideas can be bad ideas. And if adopted quickly, can be bad.
And yeah, that’s a trade off for sure
Well, the fundamental flaw in the American system is that you only have two parties since coalitions are impossible
Before that isn't tackled, I don't have much hope for American society as a whole
I seem to remember there being something about HFCS outside of the US
Because it will always be a divide between two sides
There isn't much a benefit to third parties at least in America
Some regulations the EU at least had that made it less of a thing
If anything less would probably get done with 3rd parties
HFCS is a big reason why America has an obesity problem
I think there were restrictions on soda too so some of the more popular sodas in the US are sold as energy drinks there and aren't available in the same places
Most or atleast alot of americans font just vote straight party lines
more options would be better because the parties have just devolved into pandering to their respective sides
it's why stuff like the smaller parties are often just fucked
and you have wildly differing views within a party
I mean if you thinking about it, the government would care about health a lot if they started paying for it
Everyone everywhere just votes straight party line 😛
Difference is there are more parties in other systems
"This is not the year to vote for X, we've gotta get Y into office so that we can get Z out of office" or whatever
No there are always huge movements between parties, since many ppl vote on topics and which party best represents their option on their most important topics
Just like there were alot of republicans who voted biden this year
people usually have make or break issues they vote for
Yep
and yeah trump scared a majority of republicans off
well not majority
you know what I mean
Yeah
Sure but if you switch to voting for a different party this time for some issue are you going to only do that for one seat and vote another party for everything else?
Like no matter your politics. You can agree he wouldve won if he kept his mouth shut sometimes
thats perfectly reasonable
but if you are going to vote across the line you prolly would do it more than once
and be more of a centrist
Clearly some people must do it otherwise you wouldn't have Joe Manchin or Jon Tester as US Senators
I think about 60% of americans are pretty moderate
I cant believe the people who are like”I vote for this party, everyone on that one is evil”
But I think it's much more likely you decide to vote R this time so vote straight R
I mean, it's the horrors of practically everything being partisan
and seemingly very few care to actually dig into the issues bar what the politicians preach as "we have the answers"
I don't think all Republicans are evil, just misguided 😛
We got a vote for federal parliment coming up, which will then elect a new chancellor.
What you do is have one vote for a party, and one vote for a person from your district. The person with the most votes form your district goes to parliment, plus the parties send ppl based on their overall share of votes for the party.
That way you can vote for a person you like the policies, but vote for another party in the same vote
Even if I agree with some of their policy positions they're so wrong on so much I couldn't vote for them
Like which?
Oh yeah, I forgot Germany has the best voting system so doesn't have this issue so much 😛
Which do I agree with or which are they wrong on?
Oh our voting system is far from perfect, we need stupid overhang mandates that blow up the size of our parliment and shit
Their abortion stance sucks too
Are you pro or anti abortion?
The general idea of economic protectionism makes some sense to me, tariffs where other countries are subsidizing their industry and/or subsidies to keep ours competitive sound good. Not for every industry but essentials for keeping the country and military running
Who are you to tell others what to do with their body, america is the land of the free, right?
abortion in the US should be pretty clear. 60% of the country thinks abortion in the first trimester is legal, but only 28% think it should be legal after that
But the freedom to kill a baby?
It's not killing a baby in the first trimester
The stance of abortion is just a debate as to whether an unborn child is a life
Tariffs I'd be okay with every time another country is subsidizing their industry to tilt the scales, subsidies only for critical things
It doesn't even matter if you think that's a life/person/etc
Bodily autonomy means a woman should have the right to have it removed from them
like, only 28% think its OK in the 2nd trimester and only 13% think its OK during the 3rd timester
Abortion is a VERY complex topic
Abortion in Germany is pretty fucked too. We allow it in the first 12 or 14 weeks or whatever, but doctors can't say on their website that they offer abortions or what methods they offer cause that would be advertising
What
It's such a stupid law
I'm willing to compromise on only allowing it before viability (and that's what the Supreme Court ruling on it is too) for practical reasons but philosophically it should be okay to remove the fetus at any point
If you think its a life than removing it is morrally wrong
If they can survive outside the womb cool, someone else handle that
It's first trimester in germany, just checked, after that only for medial conditions
@stoic sparrow if I hooked you up to someone with failing kidneys to act as a human dialysis machine and you removing yourself from them would kill them, should you be allowed to do so?
So if the baby isnt viable like a day before birth youd be ok with killing it
You didn't agree to be hooked up, I drugged you and did it
Are you saying in an instance where the baby threatens the mothers life?
No, your life isn't threatened, you just have to be stuck to this person until they make it to the top of the transplant list
Kek, in Nazi germany you could abort whenever, especially if you are Jewish, but it was heavily punished if you were Aryan
I belive that you should not abort a baby, but if it is a medical case then obviously so, but what if it is a case of rape, the mother never chose to have the baby, but the baby still has a life and your still killing it
But thats just a hypothetical
It's the same thing
This whole abortion discussion is way to emotional. It's scientifically proven that it's not life in the first trimester, so there shouldn't even be a need for discussion on that.
Just because that person can't survive without being connected to you doesn't mean you should be forced to stay connected to them
Well, it's obviously life, just not sapient
Yeah that's what I meant
I'm conflicted on abortions
Sentient? I always mix those up
Monke
I don't agree with them but I mean, I've never been in a situtation to feel that it's needed
But, I don't see me not being entirely happy with them to be a reason to prevent others from getting them, especially given our adoption agencies are always looking for parents and I question the moral in allowing children to be born into such broken situations
Without aborting, their live would have been ruined
The Supreme Court put the limits on abortion at viability but you can't just go get a C-section done at 23 weeks and leave the baby in the NICU until they're ready to be put up for adoption
Fun fact, in both cases the guys used condoms and the girls took the pill
Well, maybe if you had a ton of money you could get a doctor to agree to that but probably not, they'd likely lose their license
oh god, my mate was telling me of this fun story
his mate, first time with a girl, they're at it and they hear a popping noise
9 months later
I had a popped condom before, you just go to the pharmacy, buy a special pill (idk what the English term is, translations would be "the pill after" or smth), the gal will feel shit for a day (think period, but worse) and it's all good
Shouldnt yall be programming this software?
I get it though, they're doing a balancing test between bodily autonomy and the life of the fetus and decided the point where they balance out is viability
We're not paid to do it, so, you know
Still seems shitty though that just because millions of dollars of medical care can push the viability date back a week everyone loses a week of time to get an abortion
What
ah, yes, because volunteers have no right to talk outside of their volunteer work
how dare y'all
The law of the land doesn't have a fixed cut off date for abortions
It's based on viability, the point in time at which it's more likely than not a fetus would survive outside the womb
Im just commenting
Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case regarding abortion. In a plurality opinion, the Court upheld the constitutional right to have an abortion that was established in Roe v. Wade (1973), but altered the standard for analyzing restrictions on that right, crafting the undue burden standa...
This case overturned Roe v Wade 30 years ago and it seems like no one noticed
Well, it didn't overturn the "abortions are legal" part but it changed everything else about them
I don't think the question of whether it has life or not even matters
if it's using your body to survive then it is a parasite
it's your choice to take it out or not
lol, I just made that same argument
yeah perhaps i didn't scroll up that much
doesn't show that
From your image:
US has control over .com so it probably just hasn't propagated yet?
yea but that big notice isn't popping up
it's a news story
Give it however long it takes your ISP and/or OS to ignore TTLs and update their cache
It's usually instant to minutes but for some ISPs it's up to 24 hours
That's going to hurt https://twitter.com/CalMatters/status/1407348991579275270
In November, California's moratorium on insurance companies dropping coverage for Californians living in wildfire-prone areas is set to end — meaning at least 2.1 million residents could soon find themselves without homeowners’ insurance https://t.co/KVWOVMcDbQ
133
102
This is probably going to end up being another stupid thing like the flood insurance program where it's really just the government paying for people to be able to live in dumb areas where people shouldn't live
L
The equivalent to what you suggest here is rape. Not the same thing as consensual sex and cannot be compared to it.
That line of argument leads to you saying carrying a child is punishment for women wanting to have sex
You might not think that's what you're saying but it is
Adults are held accountable for the activities they engage in consensually. i.e. if you hang around with people who you know have robbed banks in the past, and they ask you to drive them to a bank, and they put balaclavas on, get out, and ask you to keep it running, you're accountable as an accomplice for any criminal acts committed.
Incorrect. It's saying that if you make a choice that has consequences, then you have to live with those consequences.
A person should not be able to make bad decisions and then just hit reset at the cost of someone else's life. The equivalent situation to what you suggested, is that you consent to being hooked up, and knowing if you decide to leave that the person will certainly and immediately die. Then you decide to leave.
It’s just child murder, anyone who tries to justify it is coping or has no real experience with it
lmao
For the record, it has never lead me to say that. Hence that's objectively false.
I agree with you 100%
@foggy fern ye, lets build right next to the ocean, hopefully no hurricane doesnt take out my basement
you end up having some really nice houses on ugly as fuck concrete blocks
Shouldn't we just get the tax payer to bail you out of that bad decision if you make it?
why should the tax payer bail you out
at the moment, the weed business in california is getting a nice $100 million dollar care package because of government mismanagement
weed ❤️
It's an industry too big to fail though /s
apparently the california government bit too much it can chew, because many businesses havent upgraded their license to operate
So they're hamstringing the growers/producers/retailers with environmental and tax policy that those individuals probably voted for, and using the money from other people who voted for it to pay them to fix the issue they caused.
pretty much
Same
Stay ontopic please.
Lmao UEFA is such a troll company
First they investigate germanies goalee for wearing a rainbow colored arm wrests
Drop it once public noticed it
Saying it's not political, but human decency and a sign of respect
Then we wanna light up the arena in rainbow colors as a sigh of human decency and respect for the ppl that suffer under the homophobic Hungarian government
UEFA denies because suddenly the rainbow flag is political again
Today they tweet again that the rainbow flag is no political and change their icon on Twitter to a rainbow flag, but still don't allow the stadium to be lit in those colors
They say it's their core values, but as soon as some authoritarian homophobic government comes along and complains they suddenly forget that fact?
"the rainbow is not a political symbol, it's a political symbol indicating support for a diverse and inclusive society"
you couldn't make this shit up haha
Like, you can see the internal conflict that's going on there
Money from dictators vs public opinion
Especially since I think if they can't hold the finale in the UK, they wanna use hungary as the next best thing
(the whole UK situation is a whole other shit show, let's cram 60k ppl into a stadium (75% capacity) when the pandemic is getting worse daily in the UK 😂 )
Meanwhile on Twitter this picture is going viral 🤣
(that's victor orban, the hungarian homophobic dictator)
(video)
Homophobe AfDler, Erdogan, Putin oder Orbán per Photoshop schminken und als größte Beleidigung posten zeugt davon wie tief Queerfeindlichkeit und Heteronormativität (hihi, der Autokrat trägt Lippenstift) gesellschaftlich verwurzelt sind.
180
1707
In my eyes this is worse than no statement at all from them lol
They're basically saying "Look, We hear you. We just don't care"
Or like, here, we have a rainbow logo now, now shut the fuck up
In related news: these are the countries we need to kick out of the EU cause they no longer represent our values
Sorry aurora
@torn wadi thoughts?
Well, am sorry, but you voted, don't complain to me, complain to your gov
well you ought to assert your moral dominance as well then, stick head out window and put them on blast
lol
Don't think that's a good idea
nah, not a good idea
Yeah no not if you value your head
Maybe in an armored car or something
The map up there is pretty bad but it's not unexpected
man, i'm kinda starting to get sick of this inclusion push tbh, where does it end?
should men and women occupy the same bathrooms, men and womens sports merge?
That's not what it's about here
Many bro.
Of which nature bro?
All kinds bro.
It's not moral dominance when it's literally a human right
Theses are the values the EU is build upon
If you no longer agree, gtfo
Worth reading https://europa.eu/european-union/about-eu/eu-in-brief_en
hm
This is how you get something like the Warsaw Pact
i see, sorta like how we Americans don't want to lose our constitutional grounding and subvert the values the country was founded on
I agree with the overall message but kicking out multiple eastern nations would be bad for the EU
If some backwards thinking homophobes want to make a new pact, go for it
Backwards thinking as they are they have quite a bit of power in the international stage when combined as a unit
If we can't all agree to condem the actions of one state that fundamentally go against our values we agreed on, what is this union even worth anymore?
was just gonna ask why the UK didn't vote but then i remembered 😒
this happens more often than id like to admit
The UK showed everybody it's possible to get out, so at least Hungary should get out too
Cause they don't give a shit about our values
But it is weird. The EU charter does talk about protection of sexual orientation and what not and that you're required to sign on it; these countries not facing repercussions means the charter doesn't mean dick
Though I do have to ask - were these values set in stone when the union invited these eastern countries to be apart of it?
If you mean founded - no, that charter seems to have been created around the year 2000; however it does seem that the bulk of these countries joined in 2004, so they'd already have known this was in the charter from the get go
There's no excuse for them to not denounce Hungary's actions lol
Even if they joined before the charter, they would have had to sign it
"sick of this inclusion push" Vector? As in, you're sick of people wanting equal rights and to be included in society? Your rights don't get taken away when more people get treated as people. And seriously, stop going on about it like it's some big conspiracy. Your bigotry is showing again.
Didn't even see that message, lmao
I can tell you where this "inclusion push" will end: when true equality is reached
So never?
Mini, Austria signed as well after getting cyberbullied a lot lol
Ah good we get to keep you then aurora, for now
Unisex bathrooms are a thing and they just work
Quite space efficient too
you ought to assert your moral dominance as well then
I gotta agree with this sadly. A lot of people don't care about queer rights, seen by their non action on big issues, but as soon as you can show that your country is morally better than another country everyone suddenly starts to care for a day or too
I hope you know I care any day
It's just that on days like these, stuff could have actually happened, but didn't, so it's easier to point that out
yeah obvs, but it's always nice to see people use us for showing that "our country is so much better" and then just throw us into the trash after they are done
(*) After the European Affairs Council, Italy, Greece, Austria and Cyprus decided to join the statement
BRO!
I operate on an objective morality, in other words my values weren't defined by me. They come from an age old book whose values have stood the test of time, interpreted from a man who died 2,000 years ago who lived a perfect life. Those values America was founded on. I'm sorry if I sound like a bigot, but when people push for something without understanding where it ends, things can go pretty badly. I believe that everyone has unalienable rights. There are clear boundaries that people should not cross, which I feel people are doing when it comes to this inclusive push. My point is, we need to be careful in the direction we head
I sure hope you don't eat seafood or wear mixed fabrics
To be fair, Greece used to be filled with Bi people back before our time.
Yeah but those are different greeks.
i'm actually a vegetarian
Also true.
Thank god I'm not in a balkan subreddit or discord or i'd be churned out by greeks for saying that 

let me not confuse you, i believe that everyone deserves to be treated fairly
Man, if you didnt revaluate your value and views for 2000 years I got some bad bad news for ya
It's not ok anymore to punch women for example
That depends on the culture you inhabit.
They are christian
Oh and we stopped this witch burning thing
The smell got too bad ya know
Moral universalism is a hot topic and I'd rather not go down the path of "It's not ok to do X" when talking about the whole planet. Maybe not in your culture, but you don't see things the same way as another culture might.
But that's the thing idriz, the EU has agreed on these moral values
So if you don't agree with the values anymore, just leave
Oh, I'm not agreeing with Vector on that part
religion can and does cloud peoples' vision though
for the germans in here: https://www.der-postillon.com/2021/06/bibelverse.html
Surely we can all agree and the human rights charter?
And that's not set to be effective
Cause you know, most countries on earth signed that
Sure, but that doesn't mean imposing moral universalism on another culture is going to work.
don't just agree about values, but try to agree on exactly why those values work
It's not imposing Moral universalim or projecting the whole culture or smth, it's just enforcing a charter you signed
Oh no I agree that the EU has that responsibility
I'm just saying in the context of the whole world you can't do that
All I wanna do is visit my extended family in ethiopia and not get killed by the police when I arrive at the airport
Countries in the EU signed that they'd follow those values
In the context of the human rights charter you can
Your book is an anthology with plot holes and inconsistent messaging, which was rewritten very recently to be anti-homosexuality (https://um-insight.net/perspectives/has-“homosexual”-always-been-in-the-bible/) and has been consistently used to start or later justify horrific acts throughout history. Very strange choice to base your life around.
Like, go read the first and second article of the human rights charter
But this is also why saying "Country X should be doing Y" doesn't sit well with me. If they signed a document saying they'd do it then they have to, but if they didn't, who are you to tell them what's morally abhorrent and not?
Remember how the EU punished Hungary for blocking immigrants?
Maybe over 2000 years we can find improvements to make in an ancient storybook's morals, too...
loving one's enemy, how about that, do you agree with that?
or is love only intended for people you already agree with / are your family?
Who's to say what's right and wrong when it comes to improving morals?
Who's the authority on that?
"hello country x pls don't kill people because they are trans" sounds like a reasonable statement to me
[also the current christian bible's only been around for what, 500ish years? Plenty of changes in what books counted or not over history]
The EU commission in this case idriz
Mini, I've clarified I'm talking about morality in the context of the whole world in general right now
the EU has clear rights countries sign to that they have to follow
if they break them they can get fucked
Well in the context of the whole world, there is the UN human rights council
to you and me both - not to someone in another country. See what's going on?
Okay, so... society collectively. Obviously nobody's going to agree fully on values, but to claim "we cannot deviate from the past" feels goofy as heck.
evolution puts humans as having evolved around 2 million years ago, is that right? My point is, if we did indeed evolve over that time period, why was it that during the last century we have seen more bloodshed than at any other time in history? did our morals evolve backward?
...Who's "collectively"? As far as I can see there's still countries that operate on these ~2000 year old values.
honestly because today it is way easier to kill a lot of people quickly
I feel you're going for some deep philosophical debate I don't have time for right now, sorry. ❤️
Nothing beats the efficiency of Nazi germany in killing
That's fine. Good talk anyway. This isn't philosophical but it's absurd to say "collectively" when you have countries who still cling to those values as their core of law
Like how long did it take to whipe out a million people 200 years ago? probably at least a few weeks. Now you just throw a nuke and that's job done
Heck, thousands of years ago there weren't even enough humans to kill 😂
Can't operate on a global scale, gotta go smaller and hope goodness spreads. 🤷
Oh and also, if you look back in time, its actually quite peaceful right now
Living is way easier, safer, for a large number of people than it has ever been in the past.
There's no authority on morality - that's my point; morality is defined by each individual culture.
^
Remember the crusades where idiots under the flag of some imaginary friend pillaged the middle east?
Is it good if moral values we perceive are good are shared with others? Sure. Should we get upset when it doesn't? No, we don't know their culture or the environment they inhabit.
These days are long past
the only authority seems to be society at this point, save religion
Religion is no authority
so why should we try to liberate other countries then? that's asserting moral dominance when the idea is that morals are subjective
Should we get upset when it doesn't?
I think so yea, depending on the topic
and that's different from the past... how? 🤔 Perhaps the largest improvement in recent times is the slow increase in atheism.
For some ppl it's an argument, that's about it
it is to me, and you can challenge Jesus' authority if you want
you can challenge the idea that you should love everyone, including your enemies
well, you can still challenge the values he wanted others to have
Jesus was probably a really cool dude tbh, but what people have made out of that religion is not cool
We can get upset. Doesn't mean we should attempt to change their mind, however. The best thing we can do is tell our people to avoid those people.
that's the ideal
Most of the stuff Jesus himself states in the bible are pretty good (other than murdering a tree for not producing fruit out of season). A lot of the crap stuff like the strong sexism (women cannot have authority over men, and such) come from the letters.
yeah, the stuff Jesus actually does in the bible is all super nice and chill. Just everyone else isn't
Organized religion has always been a cancer to the name of Religion. See the whole "cleanse your sins for a heap of gold!" period of the Church or whatever.
It's an inconsistent anthology. A collection of stories. Some hold up better than others. Some are written better than others.
kinda depends, tbh, if it's really something the society there want's or the people in charge want
@blazing junco yeah indulgences should have never been a thing
Religion was never more than a tool to control the plebs
thats not true mini
Ppl asked questions the leaders couldn't answer so they made up shit
If people want to change their own values they're free to do so. I have a problem when other people who don't understand their culture; haven't lived in it waltz in and say "this is wrong!"
religion helps a lot of people find purpose in live, and I think that thats a good thing
But then by definition your purpose is a lie :/
isn't it anyway
No, Religion is absolutely a tool to control people - especially in today's society. I do however believe that they're not created with the intent of controlling people.
Well, no, you can accept that there is no purpose, or think of your own purpose and find a place in the world
but that's also usually a lie
Saying accept means you're awfully sure of the statement that there is no purpose.
@blazing junco religion CAN be a tool to control people. See Scientology. I believe religion can be used for great purposes.
Well, I know the science idriz
IS*
It's hard to think about purpose once you understand the randomness of our existance
the university I work for has done great things in the medical field. Our mission is to continue the teaching and healing ministry of Jesus Christ
Wheres the difference between the church of scientology and the Catholic church?
based on what i understand about Scientology I find it hard to find any differences
It's hard to think there's no purpose when you consider everything is a pure coincidence.
couldn't you also say that because our existence is so random and unlikely that there has to be a purpose
at least the catholic church has a good pope now, seems pretty conservative compared to the church's history
And since there's no evidence of parallel universes, I'm inclined to believe there is more than one possibility to our existence.
A yes, the good pope, that compares trans people to animals, great dude
love him
10/10
If there was only one shot of creating the universe, how did it so perfectly turn out to lead to life?
As long as they don't solve the child raping issues and accept gays and trans they aren't a good pope
They did accept it tho.
What makes you think that we are the best the universe managed to create? That would be pretty sad, lol
i thought the current pope was more liberal than previous popes
fyi @near glen (i've said this before i'm pretty sure) but my heritage is German, 3rd generation American on dad's side, and I empathize with you on your recent past (World War II)
What has that to do with anything?
our*, though I'm all the way in America so i don't know if "our" means the same to the two of us
WW2 doesn't affect me today
that is the definition we Christians like to use of, "in the name of atheism"
Well, it was either this or complete nothingness as far as I'm aware.
Fun fact: i am officially still part of the church
Because to leave, you have to book an appointment, and they had a 6 month waiting line 😂
Cause everybody wants to gtfo here rn
Got my appointment next Tuesday
I can agree that the institution of the Church is a bit fucked up though.
a bit is an understatement tbh
Isn't a big chunk of the old testament about how to control people in 3000 BC era Mesopotamia?
This is backwards. The universe exists as it is, because we exist. If there was something else, it’d be something else.
@blazing junco organized anything is atrocious unless there are stop gaps put in place
It's a bunch of rules for things you can and can't do that viewed with a modern lens often have some use at fighting disease or more efficient farming or whatever
But it wasn't something else. And from what I've read(correct me if I'm wrong), it would be complete darkness.
because people are selfish in nature, no subjectivity there, that's objective truth
And a whole bunch of laws meant to be used to run a government
"Father, forgive them for they know not what they do." That sentence from on the cross rings true even today, that's how I feel
There is no “perfect” or anything to describe the universe. It’s what is. If something different would’ve happened, something else might’ve existed. IF we could, with excellent certainty, predict the outcome of changing a constant in our universe, that’d be almost proof we are living in a simulation
The anthropic principle is a group of principles attempting to determine how statistically probable our observations of the universe are, given that we could only exist in a particular type of universe to start with. In other words, scientific observation of the universe would not even be possible if the laws of the universe had been incompatibl...
Because you’d have to essentially accurately simulate an entire universe
I'd love to read an entire wikipedia article but can you dumb it down for me lol
Yep, it’s essentially what I was saying, the universe exists as it is, because we exist
Didn’t know about that being a named thing tho
Good to see it
If the universe worked a different way we wouldn't exist to observe it so it wouldn't matter how it worked 😛
...and what are the odds of it existing in this exact way? Unless you have evidence to facilitate that the universe could have existed in any other way, I'm inclined to believe the current state of the universe is the only one probable to exist - one where there isn't complete darkness.
I don't think this is a knowable thing
Why is there only being one more likely than there being infinite?
There isn't! That's what I'm saying. I've chosen to believe that there is only one unless proven otherwise.
Idk the answer, for now, it is unknowable, but I see no reason why one is more likely
Something something that's all I've ever known.
the point is the universe is here, so it had to either come into existence or is simply infinite
The only case in which this belief of mine would change is if multiverse theory was proven to be correct - then we could say there's infinite universes, and inevitably one would lead to what we've got.
yet, how can it be infinite, the energy was here all along
Our universe isn’t infinite, no one is saying that.
I’m talking about an infinite number of universes themselves, or an ever increasing number
I feel like we're talking about deism now
So, my perspective:
- One shot at the universe
- No proof that the universe can exist in any other way
= Random(yet functional) universal constants that allow life to exist as it does
- No proof that the universe can exist in any other way
Which puts us in good company, that's what the founders of the US were talking about too
Basically you take the anthropic principle and reverse it to get "a higher power created the universe this way on purpose" and so long as you believe everything else that happened is a natural result of physics and time you end up with deism
There is a creator, they got things started, they don't do anything else
are you a determinist idriz
Yes.
Some of the bigger figures from the founding of the US also believed this: Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and a few others maybe
That's cool to know
so you don't believe you have any free will
and none of us could help having this conversation, our brains were just reacting chemically and it led to us having this conversation
i can't imagine what it's like to be a determinist because i don't have that view myself
I don't try to think too much about it. I believe there is a creator and if there is they'll likely be way more intelligent than all intelligence in the universe combined. I won't attempt to understand why they created anything as it is. I just live my life as the little speck of nothing in the grand scheme of the universe.
i see
in my understanding God designed everything and we have freedom to choose what we want to do, because if love exists, there has to be freedom to choose it
otherwise it's not love
if there is no creator, the only explanation I have with that is everything is random and so everything runs a certain way, there's only a determined outcome and we're not free, so why does love/hate exist in the first place
That could just be part of the randomness, no? If everything is random then there isn't any reason for why something does or does exist, it's just random chance.
But if everything is random, why aren't the laws of physics random?
How do you mean?
They are constant. So not random.
Except if you accept that there were randomly generated forever.
Well, they don't change over time, sure, but I don't see why the initial law itself couldn't have just been randomly made up
So could a humans life be determined at birth?
I'm not aware of anything that would prevent us from doing that if you could simulate accurately enough
if we're all determined, then what truth one arrives at will be different to everyone else, so how can there be any truth? truth is constant, not random
then again, the statement there is no truth is itself not true
The inability to see the future.
oh wouldn't that be interesting
if we're all determined then one should theoretically be able to determine someone's future thoughts
Why couldn't we just simulate the state of the universe and then just advance forward? It's not feasible right now, but I don't see why it would be completely impossible.
It would likely require an insane amount of resources to clone the entire universe and every detail in it; even in the future, this seems unfeasable.
Because when you're cloning the entire universe, you're also gonna need to clone the detail that that universe is going to start it's own simulation, etc etc etc.
What makes you say that?
if we're just machines with inputs and outputs you should be able to calculate the output before it occurs
Well, an entire life is perhaps a bit too large of a scope, but just a small amount of time, or perhaps even just a small part of the life is something that I think could be feasible in the future.
You can't predict the future after you've simulated the universe. You can only predict the past, because if you predict the future, you may have to predict every single thing that happens in the simulated universe inside your simulation, creating a type of recursive loop for that simulation as well.
See - because what you see in the simulated universe could create conclusions that can alter the future, so every minute detail has to be important to get a 100% accurate view of what will happen in the future.
Well, it'd need to be so small that the simulation and the thing you're simulating don't have time to interact with each other.
How do you mean?
Well the simulation could only ever affect the outcome if the thing you're simulating and the simulation ever interact. If they don't interact, then they can't alter the outcome. So you could only do a very small amount of time - the time in which they couldn't have possibly interacted.
By the very observation of the simulation it interacts with you.
When you start the simulation and you see it running you've effectively interacted with it - you've created thoughts, conclusions, and ideas.
You'll have to simulate those as well to get a 100% accurate simulation of the future.
But I don't watch the simulation simulating myself, though, I simulate something different. If the thing you simulate and the simulation are right next to each other, then they'll interact immediately.
You don't need to watch it.
You aren't really simulating in that case. You are just spectating what was already predeterminant.
Yeah.
You still need to simulate it.
You want the future
Something something butterfly effect
Yes, but not necessarily my future, could be anyone else's.
But you can't predict somebody's future without predicting everything else at the same time.
Yes, but if the "universe" determined that you are going to do that, it already has an answer for it.
Because then you haven't predicted the future.
Fair point
We can't use simulations to predict the future because you get stuck in a recursive loop
Would need to have, like, a second universe which can't interact with the first.
But if you did then you can't draw conclusions from the universe.
How come?
You can't figure out anything that's happened in the future.
Well the moment you interact with it you have to simulate every observation you found in the simulation. And so does the simulation inside of it. And so on and so on.
To simulate the future - The simulation has to simulate the future which has to simulate the future which has to...
But I don't interact with it? I'm in a hypothetical second universe that can't interact with the first and vice versa. I know the state of the first universe (magically) and now I simulate.
How is it an alternate future?
Because you haven't simulated the universe in that simulation.
Butterfly effect's a bitch
Well, no, I don't predict the future of the second universe, only of the first universe.
Yeah but what's that useful for?
That's an alternate future.
Where you didn't do the simulation.
And things can turn out differently.
But I'm not in the same universe, though?
That's the entire point, the simulation and the simulated thing can't interact.
If you want to predict the future of your universe you can't.
If you want to predict the future of another then sure.
Yeah, that's my point
The thing is, you know the future of your universe, but it's on a set path, so nothing changes, as you are merely a spectator.
Yeah that's fair.
How do you know the future of your universe tho
Slovenia already predicting the future smh
If "you" simulated it. But as already said, you are just spectating what the universe generated.
I'm saying that you'll have resources to simulate the universe up to the point you simulate the universe
Nothing after
You could, if the universe is predeterminant.
If pre-determinant then you'd not try to simulate the universe at all.
From what I'm gathering you're saying if you know the future there's no reason to predict it
It would simulate itself.
But you'd have to give it resources to do that, no?
Yes, but I'm saying that if the universe want's to do that, it will do that.
It uses it's own logic, since again, it's already set.
Oh yeah sure, if the future is pre-determined then everything happens in a set of steps
But if we, as mortals, want to predict the future we can't use a simulation of our current universe
Depends on what is real. But most likely no.
The only thing that is real is Republic Of Kosovo.
💪.
I predicted the future. Kosovo is becoming superpower.
Don't ask me how I did it. Classified Slovenian technology.

"Body Positivity" is going too far
It puts nowadays puts aside that being fat isn't good
Well some do
whenever anyone says "is going to far" you can just immediately assume that whatever is coming next is gonna be either factually incorrect or a massive exaggeration of the facts
in this case, the second
Well, I read some articles listed first on google and many don't even mention being fat is bad
"some articles listed first on google"
Yea, which means they are rather popular
popular why
On the top of google
yes, why do you think it's popular
So they're published by popular prints
I don't hate fat people I just think they should work on themselves and be healthier
you're not answering my question
things can be popular because they incite this kind of reaction
Because google puts popular articles first, mostly
Well, still can't find many articles that see the body positivity from a non ideological standpoint
so because you saw one article and couldn't easily find any articles that aren't "ideological" you have decided to make a blanket statement that X is going to far
do you think that is a reasonable way to go about life
I'm just talking from experience
There are some youtube channels putting the movement into some critical light, but from what I've seen online the general census seems to be that being fat is totally fine
"from what ive seen"
do you not understand that social media enjoys pushing stuff that you will get angry at
How else are you to judge societies views
ill ask this, have you actually spoken to any body positivity activists in real life?
I live in a little village in Germany, so no
I still read some newspapers though
Always good to be informed
But yeah, it's probably true that many news websites try to push one sided controversial articles to get more views
Some examples include Vice, Buzzfeed, Fox News
CNN
right, so lets correct your earlier statement then "despite my limited world view and lack of experience with body positivity activists, i believe that body positivity has gone too far due to articles i have seen from social media sites that are known for pushing fringe views to generate disagreement"
How else am I supposed to form an opinion about such topics
That's what newspapers are supposed to be there for
unbiased research, view studies, talk to real people with opposing views
I mean I am not going to spend lots of time on such a topic, just gathering some impressions
okay, so if you're not interested in the topic why come here and talk about it?
The talking to different people with opposing views is what I am doing here
Hey look, rainbow flag in the stadium, on the field, that's illegal
so McAfee is dead by suicide 
_The Jeffrey kind. _
I assume that just like with Jeff, jokes can be made instantly.
yeah I guess he tweeted a while before saying that that if him kills himself it was the US not him
Getting subtle messages from U.S. officials saying, in effect: "We're coming for you McAfee! We're going to kill yourself". I got a tattoo today just in case. If I suicide myself, I didn't. I was whackd. Check my right arm.
$WHACKD available only on https://t.co/HdSEYi9krq:)
4435
7046
I am content in here. I have friends.
The food is good. All is well.
Know that if I hang myself, a la Epstein, it will be no fault of mine.
2269
9669
what would be the reason why the us would want him bumped off?
Promoting tax evasion and crypto.
Just promoting crypto is fine, but promoting crypto as a means of tax evasion, big no no.
seems a bit extreme tbh - i thought he was pretty widely considered to be a bit crazy
although this is the us we're talking about so 🤷
If we makes references two suicide twice that could indicate that he has been unstable for a while
If he thinks about that topic all the time
a lot can change in half a year
If he was unstable, he would be put on suicide watch, with 2 sleeping guards and broken cameras.
It's not always obvious, plus that would mean guard actually care about inmates mental health which is a stretch, especially in the US
I don't think he was in the US right?
Listen our federal prisons aren't half bad
Not yet.
:p
They're not private at least
The mental health ones are usually effective with suicide watch too
Well, German prisons are considered good and a friend I guess was in prison for two and a half years
It was the best thing that has ever happened to him, but it was still quite horrifying
Look bro. Epstein just tripped. 
definitely a lot of "coincidences" in his case
I don't think anybody are gonna say he's not where he belongs, but, given all the other info that was coming around at the time and all the "random" people who where found to have been buddy buddy with him around the same time, It's erm... Not surprising, er...
Important detail
He committed suicide shortly after being cleared for extradition to the US
Who did that after being cleared for extradition?
If you mean Epstein that's categorically false. He was arrested in New York, and died in the Metropolitan Correctional Center of New York.
Yeah probably
Yeah afee
Yeah no worries, was just confused since it seemed like the conversation shifted.
Either way, it is pretty interesting that he even hinted at his potential suicide yet still managed to pull it off. Similar in Epstein case multiple people I know in person said "he's probably going to end up 'committing suicide' before he gets to trial", as well as people online.
That being said if there was any conspiracy, it'd be unlikely to ever be proven.
Your point about after clearance for extradition makes it more believable, if he was really already suicidal that could tip someone over the edge.
just as straightforward as OJ Simpson's case huh
ofc i'm not serious
that guy gets constant knife jokes thrown his way on twitter lmao
Coca Cola allowing you to put every anti-trans slur on their rainbow bottles but banning you from writing “lesbian” is peak corporate pride tbh
10467
71692
Oh god
Check the replies
Gay pride, banned, white pride, ok
Black lives matter banned, white lives matter, ok
How can you fuck this up so badly?
In unrelated news, a win for democracy
cant put "Free Hong Kong" either
What about
光復香港,時代革命
I mean to be fair they probably had some intern make the censor
I'm sure they will fix it soon
If there's enough pressure for them to notice that is
but to instantly be like "peak corporate pride" is 
Cant wait for a internet historian video on how Coke broke the number 1 rule of the internet, giving anonymous users option to type whatever they want
yeah idk how the PR department doesn't see that ending poorly
they should have just used Minecraft Bedrock's word filter 
Dutch prime minister would rather have Hungary out of the EU
"Rutte: ’Hongarije heeft niks te zoeken in EU’ | Binnenland | Telegraaf.nl" https://www.telegraaf.nl/nieuws/1498612839/rutte-hongarije-heeft-niks-te-zoeken-in-eu
i understand where he's coming from but that's a bit extreme
I mean
Maybe not out but there has to be repercussions
They broke a pretty major rule
yeah
Well, as I said, the foundation of the EU is build on a handful of shared values
If you no longer share those values with the rest of us, that should lead you to ask questions like, do we really belong here
the EU has gotten to big for what it was
John McAfee did not uninstall himself
he was what he was trying to create a program to prevent: a virus
yes he did it's exactly a him move
or he just faked his death with his copious amounts of money
I mean, he hacked a heart attack before to escape prison
including all the shady/illegal shit he's done?
*especially 😄
I was looking up something to try to help someone in #paper-help
wtf is this google
LMAO
lol
Derek Chauvin will be sentenced for the murder of George Floyd on Friday at 2:30 p.m. ET. The fired Minneapolis police officer was found guilty in April of second-degree unintentional murder, third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter in Floyd’s death.
For someone with no criminal history, like Chauvin, Minnesota sentencing guidelines ...
He should be freeed
Why?
22.5 years
Yup, just saw that.
eligible for parole in 15 I think
Minnesota you have to do at least 2/3 so yeah, exactly 15 years
I think that's just to get out and be done with it though, not parole
You can reduce your sentence via "good time" but you only get 1 day good time for every 2 days you don't cause problems
If you get out early on parole you stop building up more good time and have to be on parole for whatever time you have left
So sometimes it's better to just serve your time
that's actually not a horrible argument
“If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice”
- Aristotle
it means there is no big market choice where they know that anything on it has gone through a review process
if apple allows sideloading, there will be no choice for consumers that forces a review process
I just don't see how that's relevant
its eliminating choice
