#politics
1 messages · Page 67 of 1
what was funny
your foreign policy screams of being found exclusively on twitter.com
no?
ok, well good day!
ok, now would be a good time to back up your claim with a source
noooo problem
"You are stealing my house."
This is what a Palestinian woman told an Israeli settler, as he tried to take over her family's home in occupied East Jerusalem's Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood.
Subscribe for more videos: https://ajplus.co/subscribe
Sign up for subtext, our newsletter about the people and movements driving change in our societ...
there
there are tens more people like her being kicked out of their places
and being replaced with jewish settlers
lol single video
and from AJ at that
AJ, the state news organization for Qatar, which supports Hamas, a terror organization who want to kill all jewish people
but it still doesn't cover what the video is saying
he is clearly stealing her house
infront of her
🍉
plus hammas only started attacking after giving israel a warning to give back the innocent hostages they took
israel started first
and isreal is attacking the mosques while the Palestinians are praying
so fucking terminally online jesus
what
So Ahmed you're going to disregard the hundreds if not thousands of women and children that were targeted by Hamas and the Palestinians by directly going into schools and murdering them for joy, but Israel is "ethnic cleansing"?
Seems quite hypocritical tbh
So, should Israel allegedly starting "it" allow a group of terrorists to advocate for a position of having all Jews exterminated?
Im getting sum weird vibes from Ahmed ngl he wants all jews exterminated who does that sound like?
why does that sound familiar 
Hamas is ass and Israel is ass
humans have ass, mini
this place is radioactive omfg
and your comment unnecessary
I don't really mind, nor do I care even
No one said that
There was a map that was agreed upon by UN to divide the land into palestine and israel
But they broke the treaty like its no one’s business and no one is doi g a ything about it
They almost have take all of palestine
I do think it's fucked up that Israel basically waltzed into ME territory because of big boys playing map drawing, but that doesn't validate Hamas at all
Hamas does what it does for political points, and so did Netanyahu
and there was no UN agreed upon treaty for two states
The US vetoed that because they wanted both Israel and Palestine to pick the borders
Cause the US didn't agree 😂
Thanks... Eisenhower?
Hammas is only a small group of people
This isn't true
It is
Israel has nuclear weapons, and countries start using nuclear weapons when their sovereignty is threatened
Hamas is literally a huge part of the Palestinian government
Yeahh..
Its small in comparison to the about of innocent civilians living in gaza
Israel kills one man from hamas and 10 other innocent people with him
While this is true Israel should also recognize that it was placed there. I think they should try to achieve a two state solution, but Palestine is being hindered by having a terrorist group in its government lol
yeah 100%
do you have any data for this
Oh yeah i do
not from AJ
they're part of the Qutar government
Israel bombing and murdering civilians is pretty well documented on international accounts tbh.
They're a bit biased in this case
Which has backed Hamas for years
I support the palestinian people but absolutely not Hamas
.
Hamas is using this situation for their own political points
btw there was this recently too https://www.hrw.org/report/2021/04/27/threshold-crossed/israeli-authorities-and-crimes-apartheid-and-persecution
Summary
About 6.8 million Jewish Israelis and 6.8 million Palestinians live today between the Mediterranean Sea and Jordan River, an area encompassing Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT), the latter made up of the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip. Throughout most of this area, Israel is the sole governing ...
This is not a source
I'm not even necessarily saying you're wrong I just know you're basing everything you're talking about from YouTube videos, Twitter, or Instagram
Its kinda dumb that every time palestinian civilians get bombed by israel they say it was an act of defense and point out to hamas
go outside
I have palestinian people in gaza recording all this with their phones
I mean i follow the@
I mean he does have a point there. Pretty sure that a media building was bombed recently as well
M
Yeah al jazeera
The building that was bombed I was pretty sure was Al Jazeera as well as AP
Yep
They were given plenty of warning before it actually happened
Sometimes Hamas really is storing stuff in one of these places, other times Israel doesn't care about civilian casualties and just bombs the place when a member of Hamas happens to be there
They were warned that they must evacuate but not allowed to bring out any equipment
Probably because they didn't want them still inside
Thing is they had over an hour I believe
Bombing the media building is a really bad look
People still die
Oh yeah you don't want to give Hamas too much time
But yeah bombing a media building is really bad but I don't think Israel is really after optics
And a surefire way to get all the media to start reporting negative things about you
The only evidence for Hamas presence was a tweet by the IDF with a red rectangle painted on the building though
AJ does have a Palestine bias anyway
Even AP has been really weird about Israel Palestine report
Reporting*
That's like the one thing the AP is weird on
Well I mean historically not after the bomb
And as for the only evidence being the IDF tweet, what other way would you get evidence
You wouldn't
Israel probably isn't going to share how they get this intel
You also shouldn't take the IDF's tweet's word for it though lol. It's a media building that they screenshotted and painted red over
And not just any media building - AP news and AJ stationed there
The last thing they'd want is housing Hamas
They didn't have to necessarily know
I wouldn't trust AJ to report on it necessarily but the AP may not have known
They weren't just housing Hamas, they were housing Hamas military equipment as well according to the IDF
A little difficult to miss shots coming from the roof lol
Idk I don't think their goal was to try and silence media because that's a pretty ineffective way of doing it, especially nowadays
Actually it could very well serve as a warning to them
"Don't fuck around. We can call you Hamas and you're fucked"
Might make them think twice about reporting on the front line
ehhhhh
Israel doesn't care about optics but they know that's not really possible to do
Still, if israel really wanted to fix this problem, they could have went in themselves, but that would caused more issues and deaths.
What is this supposed to prove? This changes nothing that I said lol
The IDF has been documented murdering civilians before and also bombing them. This isn't about warnings or not, it's about civilian casualties in cases like this
I'm aware the IDF warns civilians most of the time
Also this "hamas hides everywhere" argument is pretty tired; you can't keep having civilian collateral casualties because you have a hunch Hamas is there
This changes nothing about what I said
Yes but it also happens in the IDF
So it changes nothing about what I said
(also if there really is Hamas fighters in these buildings warning them beforehand seems like a terrible idea lol)
Okay so you edited your message there - the people who commit those crimes do it intentionally
That media building didn't have rocket launching pads
Remember, civilians are only innocent if they are on your side 
If it did the AP and AJ are complicit and they should be investigated
idk what this adds to the discussion lol
Interesting. What are your thoughts on those clashes between Palestinians and Israelis on riots?
So people who are walking away from solders are showing acts of violence and should be shoot in the spine?
Condemned? Sure. Killed for it?...
@shy gulch Heard of James Miller?
He was shot while recording a documentary on the Gaza Strip by an IDF soldier.
The IDF soldier was never prosecuted.
18 months for a war crime
lol
No, it's a war crime under the geneva conventions actually
You can't kill injured soldiers
Eventually, the Israeli government agreed to pay the Miller family £1.75 million, if the British government agreed to close the case, and not demand the extradition of the Israeli soldiers involved in his killing.[30]
Israel is the closest thing to Serbia in the ME 
Why does that matter?
An yet, nothing came from it.
War crimes that happened 20 years ago aren't war crimes.
It was heavily implied that because this event took place 20 years ago, charges shouldn't be pressed against the perpetrators
By the way, they guy who shot Malek Issa in his eye was never investigated.
9 year old kid
I've brought up two examples where Israeli law failed to prosecute their own soldiers for war crimes.
Also Hamas soldiers don't get punished because they're a terrorist organization. If they're caught, they'll be punished.
If they're not caught.. well.. you can only pull a charge in absentia which wouldn't matter
That depends. Do you think bombing civilians is a war crime?
No. The main reason it re-ignited was Al-Aqsa Mosque being raided during the last day of Ramadan.
In which case Hamas "retaliated for the palestinian people"(we all know they did it for political points, hamas are pieces of shit)
Wait. So collateral damage on civilians should not be considered a war crime?
18 month sentence for murder "punished" "it's ok cuz they're soldiers"
They're not military stations, you said it yourself - "Hamas hides amongst civilian presence"
Why ping reply for a message directly above yours
And according to you civilians are warned beforehand
No it's not better then no punishment it is no punishment
So how are all these casualties adding up?
You're.. not saying that Hamas launches rockets on Palestinians right?
I'm talking about the casualties adding up on the Palestinian side - who, according to you, are very well informed beforehand which buildings are going to be targeted
In my eyes I'd evacuate the building when told it was going to be blown to shit, and I think any sane person would
You can't expect me to believe every civilian casualty in Palestine is Hamas
lol
But because you're saying every civilian is warned beforehand
How come they're still dying
Oh?
So they're not warned?
Pretty terrible things would happen.
Because a terrorist organization fires rockets into their territory.
I'm not disputing that Hamas is a terrorist organization and wants to harm Israeli citizens
I'm saying that the IDF is committing war crimes and painting them all under the guise of "We promise it's Hamas." when they won't even charge their own soldiers
Israel has the full right to defend themselves
No it's ok bro they're soldiers
But I do have a problem with bombing anyone and everyone and saying "It was Hamas!"
That's a disputed statement.
The only source of information we have for them not targeting civilians on purpose is Israel.
Who doesn't charge their soldiers for civilian casualties they cause.
It's like when Milosevic denied any war crimes were happening in Bosnia or in Kosovo.
Having been to Jerusalem as a kid, it feels weird hearing about all this conflict now
Communism good
b-b-but venezuela cuba 100 million!!1
Don't troll
how so
no you can actually just use the soviet union as an example lol
I was being sarcastic + it kind of becomes non-communism when you mix dictatorship into the drink, but ¯_(ツ)_/¯ yeah
Well technically the definition of Communism by Karl Marx is Anarchy, but everyone is super nice and nobody do crime because everyone super cool
It's an utopian idea that doesn't work
To achieve this anarchist non system he proposed socialism, which kinda is the other end of the extreme; government controls and organizes the entire economy
Because the way to achieve communism (socialism) goes against human nature
That's it.
what would you know about communism
Because humans are just like animals, only try to behave when others are watching.

I thought you was in one of the ex blocc countries but I forget
I could also argue that since humans are social beings, the natural instinct is to try to survive in groups and that means mutual help
And that we're not like, the greedy beings that capitalism says we are
Keep forgetting and you might actually start floating away.
I feel like these arguments (arguments is probably the wrong word for it) typically meet a stopping point when either communism (or capitalism, I guess) both have the same issue where folks apply their meaning or flavor to the concept and it becomes only slightly better sounding but ultimately the same thing.
I mean, theres many issues with capitalism
Do any of the issues start with J?
But, I mean, the concept of everything being owned and ran by higher up, just, it's dumb
That's technically the opposite of the idea of capitalism
Adam Smith proposed an economic system in which each individual had complete economic freedom, contrary to the time's monarchic systems
In theory, the system would perfectly, just like communism
But he forgot that most people don't make rational decisions when it comes to economics
And many people simply don't have the knowledge to become successful
I mean, a lot of stuff is complex and pretty much all systems forget the nuance of the human, reminds me of the sully movie
[When it comes to everything being owned and ran by higher ups, I don't think anyone particularly disagrees - where I'm coming from on that is a lack of trust. In the hypothetical scenario where we do somehow establish a state leadership, I'm skeptical. When it comes to America, which is what my hypothetical is and frankly I think the same issue would exist outside of it:
People can barely trust their elected officials now, I could only imagine what happens when someone seizes control otherwise. Bureaucracy and whathaveyou isn't a concept strictly tied to capitalism.]
this is what was written.
I think capitalism is the strongest system we have, but, in part, we need to get governments out, clean up the tax code shit (you could clean up the tax code, reduce taxes, and still pull in more cash!)
The issue with systems of central control is that, where does innovation come from? the government? with their floppy drives to manage their nukes... (I mean, it is/was/in the process of being upgraded, but, sheesh); How fast is government at getting literally anything done?
It's part of what people worry about with their health care, you can say that free health care is great, but, a good number of people travel from the UK and Canada to the US for treatment, because central government restricts access to new treatments and such due to the monetary costs and such; waiting lists often push people to go abroad for care, like, dental treatment and cosmetic stuff is often muuuucch cheaper abroad and such because theres a diverse market open for it; Biggest issue with the US health system imho? government. and excessive regulation requiring over-administrative hell, as well as shady backwards dealings
"shady backwards dealings"
And you've essentially outlined atleast a good half of the issue of with current day capitalism/just this country in general -
We are of the same mind when it comes to cleaning up the government, frankly I believe that is the only 'good future', because you're right any actual progress being made is either backtracked by some nutjob or halted by some nutjob being elected. As for what you said on upgrading, yeah -
When it was found that China was upgrading it's military arsenal over the course of seven years it took less than half that time for the US to do that hence you hear talks about new modular assault weapons in use. While sure it was in the Trump administration, I highly doubt we'll see WW3 pop up so you can kind've tell where peoples minds were at and they were far out of sanity.
I mean, i feel that the first term of any president in the US is basically reversing what the last peep did
If only both parties in the US got together and agreed on a paste of laws for the next 10 or 20 years that everyone would promise not to revert if they get to power, then we could see some progress
but with things only lasting as far as a 4 year term, it won't do much
(and this can pretty much apply to any country tbh)
The US only having two political parties is fucked
Imo Germany and Switzerland have the best democratic systems
Thing is with switzerland you need high election participation or a minority can influence a huge part of the election, which is kinda difficult in huge ass countries like the US
The German election system is called "Personalisierte Verhältniswahl" which provides regional representation of every region in parlament while maintaining proper power ratios
Germany has the slight issue with overhang mandates so our parliment is freaking huge
But yeah, at least we got a bunch of parties
yea, the overhang mandates kinda are a problem
we should switch to 1/3 of the seats being granted by a direct mandate
you need to find a good mix between having lots of parties and still being able to form a coalition
the weimar republic had no 5% hurdle, meaning lots of radicals and no government
I disagree with the 5% hurdle on a fundamental level and I don't think it's fair to compare today's society with the Weimar republic
Communism would only work in a Star Trek world where we have infinite energy and replicators so the only reason to do something is for the art of it
That doesn't mean we shouldn't have a robust social safety net though, these are not the same thing
I think that might be a US thing, screaming "socialism" every time the government tries to do something
Yeah, that's what I always say it's a scale, you wanna avoid the extremes on both ends and find a nice middle ground
Like, Germany isn't Communist or socialist by any stretch of the imagination, but we are way further down that road compared to the US, and generally it seems to benefit our society
you can make real criticism of communism
but this is just a strawman
do you know why the first internationale dissolved?
it was because marx and the anarchists (bakunin mostly) didn't agree, so they split it up
Both democracy and communism are systems that lead people into violence
All people is different so agreements will never keep people satisfied
The best politic system for now is capitalism, not yet implemented in it's pure state
Yes, capitalism is well known for its peace and lack of violence
Socialism.
I wonder if there is some kind of 3rd system
That on like a different scale
The Third Position is a set of neo-fascist political ideologies that developed in Western Europe following the Second World War. Developed in the context of the Cold War, it developed its name through the claim that it represented a third position between the capitalism of the Western Bloc and the communism of the Eastern Bloc.
Between the 1920s...
just like the western world lives in non-democratic capitalist systems, right?
i live on a communist country and there is no intermediate, all intermediates end up being communist and end up on poverty and corruption. in the 90's we got a little capitalism and we were about to be a first world country but because of communism we ended up with high external debt and poverty again.
my country is a communist experiment or something like that, they try weird stuff and it always fails
South America got some weird systems
thats where i live sadly
I think it was Chile that tried computer powered Communism in the like 80 or smth
I wonder if that would lead to different results now that we got "AI"
only someone with the power of a god can manage a system like communism
you need everyone to agree with the system and do as the system says
but what do you mean with that? if there is people that dont agree with communism it will just dissapear
i mean people will always like to get more power and open business
so its impossible to keep up communism because of human nature
and because of communism giving people stuff even if they dont work its highly inefficent and leads to poverty
in my country there are states that are fully communist and capitalist states have to keep them up with taxes
In my country everybody is capitalist and we still have to keep others up with taxes 😂
because its not capitalism, but mixed capitalism with democracy
there is no country with pure capitalism yet
Thankfully, lol
In other news, football world is freaking out because the German goal keeper and caption wears a rainbow armband while playing 😂
Because apparently that's a political statement
Wait till they find out that Munich wants to turn the Allianz Arena into a giant led rainbow flag for the game against Hungary 😂 😂
what do you mean most of countries apply the same laws to everyone right?
If thinking everybody should be treated equal political to you, I think we have a different understanding of human rights
Not in Hungary 😂
iirc Hungary has been getting more anti-LGBT laws
That I don't know, (i bet it is), but recently they disallowed movies with gay characters and stuff to be shown without age restrictions or smth
I already forgot the details cause it's so fucking stupid
EU parliment is sueing EU commission because they don't act on this matter
I think I heard sometime ago that they introduced gay-free zones, but I might be misremembering that or confusing it with a different country.
thats crazy
Some European countries are on a bad trajectory rn
Poland is as bad as Hungary
And it seems Austria is entering that slope too now
And then you got fuckheads like azerbaijan
Literally staging genocides
i quite understand some antilgbt laws as some countries in europe are having low child birth rate but forcing people into being something is not right at all
i think this is another failure of democracy where people decide to do something but politics dont want them to
That's the most stupid justification for those laws I have heard so far, lmao
Just because you are gay doesn't mean you can't have kids
Medicine can do wonderful things nowadays
And gay couples often just adopt, solving another problem
Did you think of that argument or did you heard that elsewhere? Because I never heard it before
they are less likely to have kids
Idk if there is data on that but maybe
But like, the most comment reason ppl bring up for banning LGBT stuff is religion
Hur dur god doesn't want this, god doesn't want that, fuck god
That's why we can't have nice things
thats true
but in some countries lgbt and feminism is like a religion, making war because of extra rights that were never the point of the movements
here we have feminism like a religion, lot of women are assasinated by man and instead of making something about it they make statues and benchs with feminism significate
i really don't think you know what you're talking about tbh
like, genuinely, did you just make that up?
nope
it was a new in my country
they use feminism to get votes and they wont stop the killing
i would love to hear more about these feminist assassinations, sounds badass
no i mean, lot of women are killed by their couples and feminism instead of doing something about it they make benchs and statues
instead of increasing security for women
and it became like a religion instead of a purpose or right for the woman
again, id love to read some news about this
Extra rights? Ppl just want the same rights, lol
in my country they already have the same rights but they want to make women only stuff
and do they have the same rights in practice?
Can you provide an example?
yes
often not
because in theory women have the right of getting an equal salary to a man of the same qualifications
in practice that often does not happen
Which country is this exactly?
argentina
an lgbt city... this is like some right wing fantasy land
well you think an lgbt city opening would at least make the first page of google
there is no lgbt city, there is however "Latin America's gay capital" (Buenos Aires) because of LGBT tourism being high there
it was opened by a left wing group
that has nothing to do with feminism or LGBT activism
it was recent
source: trust me bro
give us articles proving it then
That assumes ppl care about what happens in south America, lol
opened by the goverment
of state of la rioja
i think this is extremely anti lgbt
threating them like they are not allowed in our society
... a neighborhood is not a city, though?
i know a bit of spanish and barrio does not translate to city
yeah i got confused there
Concentration camp light, segregate them so they don't ruin ma neighbor or what's happening here?
yeah locals compare it to that
seems to just be a neighbourhood in which there are many LGBT+ people and especially establishments, and therefore became a so-called "gay village"
again, you seem to have no idea what you're on about - the term "gay village" is just used to describe areas with high percentages of lgbt people, they didn't "make" a gay city lmao
Not sure how that relates to your point that they want more rights than others, this just seems like a slippery road down to less rights?
yeah but do you think is right to tag gay people like that?
and separate them
they only accept lgbt there
no?
stop concern trolling, nobody is forcing them to live there and no, they don't only accept LGBT people
I mean, cologne is seen by many as a gay city
they do
it's just a place with a lot of LGBT establishments and LGBT people therefore prefer to go there
you have to be lgbt to be accepted
again, source: trust me bro there's one screenshot here
"El gobierno de La Rioja construyó un barrio de 25 viviendas destinadas únicamente a personas gay o trans, por el programa HabitAR, y lo llamó "Barrio LGBT+""
if you're gonna get angry about something, can it at least be a real thing
there's one of those in Stockholm which is pretty cool. there are straight, cis people there and they're just fine... it's just a place with more LGBT concentration
so 25 gay people bought homes?
are they?
We got a street in cologne filled with gay clubs and bars, it's a pretty wild place, but pretty chill in general. They all share one wardrope whcih is nice
there are state subsidised & funded homes in basically every country
you've still yet to provide a single actual source for this haha
in sweden, they exist for anyone who can't work, have certain needs, are under 25, etc.
there's nothing wrong per se to provide them to minorities in need
the problem is that we have one of the countries with highest poverty and highest taxes
and with highest inflation too
"There we started to talk about the fact that these houses will have classrooms where they will be able to go for training and work," he said.
The housing units belong to those being built in the province with the "Housing with a decent roof" program, but with the addition of shared spaces for recreation, with rooms equipped for businesses and services such as health centers.
"It is a way for the state to be present in the lives of the compañeras", assured the legislator.
The project is aimed at the trans, transvestite and transgender population. In total, there will be 25 houses.
so a group of people targetted with hate crime and whatnot on a daily get some houses...
that's not a big deal
it's also pretty clear this is for LGBT people in need
"we've got so much poverty"
"grr the government are providing the needy with homes and education"
so they care about 25 lgbt people but not about 50% of poor people in the country, and they keep printing papers
nationalized companies are in debt too and we have to pay them with taxes
these houses will have classrooms where they will be able to go for training and work
this is a direct measure to help against poverty
hahahaha
of course not
if you increase taxes or inflation to give people houses they wont be able to pay for food
.... do you know how taxes work?
education is literally one of the main ways to decrease poverty?
yes
education is an objectively good way to help poor people who can't get decent, long-term jobs (hey, that means long-term, stable taxes, which again benefits everyone!)
in this case education is not properly bring, we have free education and a lot of colleges for the poor but they dont finish because they have to start working at short age
so no, education will not solve this as people needs food now, they need work first, then education
so then it's a good idea to provide people with housing and support so they can get through the education system without dropping out
thats not the problem, the problem is that even if they are educated there are no jobs available
because of taxes companies left the country so you are entering a vicious circle
where you give houses but lose jobs
it has been like this since early 1900 and we are still poor, it doesnt work
it is even a meme on south america, finishing education but not finding jobs
(yeah we laugh about our own disgraces)
and even if we gave an small percent of the cash of all the people that works there will not be enough for poor people to eat because everyone is poor already
so im not gonna claim to know much about argentina, but 25 homes for some minorities is not gonna break your entire economy
nah, the point is about the interest of the politics to get votes
while people starves to death, they keep making lgbt stuff and stuff like that to look cool, but they hate lgbt and everyone
even the president made racist commentaries, he is a fake lgbt defender
and yeah the point is that they always make this politics "in defense of the minorities" but the country is on fire and this minorities are still suffering more and more
not these ones who have a nice house and education
and who has nice houses and education?
those people in the houses they just built..
they are low quality houses
how on earth do you know that lmfao
i just love your logic here, you're jumping about all over the place
yes because everything is related
"how dare they provide houses and education to these people, it's taking away good housing and education to people"
i've never said that
It was a paraphrase. But this is more entertaining to watch from the sidelines Than to actually be in the discussion. So I’m not going to pick a side. (i don’t know enough about the situations to have an opinion)
by making that free education and houses, not only lgbt but for all the other people, of bad quality of course, they increase taxes and inflation to get votes. People that works can't keep paying the food and houses and become poor.
sure my country is crazy and i want to share everything from it
europe has a decent system where the state only gives essential stuff to poor people
but here is taken to an extreme that a lot of stuff is nationalized
taxes are +60% in here
Hoo- that’s a lot
Almost as bad as Canada /j
But that actually is definitely too much to take from someone who can’t afford it
/srs
And thats not only it...
Stuff for other countries have extra tax so in total you pay the double for stuff that you get from outside
Import taxes, yes.
And yeah i have been eating noodles for 6 months
Oh wow
by the way something absurd of this country is that they take taxes from workers of the state too haha
idk how that works
A lack of money can often lead to the government needing more money then they tax, and overbearing taxes + the inability to pay them = 💥
thats exactly what we have, they print papers to pay the debts, inflation
That’s what happened in the American & French Revolutions
The French Revolution was just a mess of poorly put together attempts to help the poor but they were too far gone with their horrible leadership and hoards of people willing to do anything to either eat or gain power. That plus the extremists (which get the most attention) gained popularity and for I think half a century (don’t quote me on that) it was just massive bloodshed and power being passed from one corrupt to the next
And by attempts I mean like there was one
But King Louis IV was not a good person, and was kinda like ‘screw them I wanna party’
A neighbour country called venezuela is not even at war and has worse inflation values than some countries did on post war, it is full communist, expropiated every business possible
Canada seems to be doing relatively well, but socialism has massive downsides in the quality of services.
i heard about some issues with socialism in canada, what happened there?
I dunno
Just public healthcare system is...
Not that good
But that’s in comparison to private healthcare
Umm
I think it depends. It’s tied to your insurance and where you work
But most companies are required to provide a healthcare insurance. Which when it was first implemented was viewed very controversially but I think it’s good.
in argentina we have public health system, syndicate health system, pre-paid health system and the classic private health system.
i think pre-paid is the best system as it allows the poor to access private healthcare system
you pay like 10 dollars a month and you get essential coverage
...? Usually the problem here is that if you can’t find a 'typical job' and you can’t find access easily.
atypical jobs would be like manual labor, not long term, some part time jobs I think.
I’m not sure
pre-paid is that you pay a small fee each month to get health-care coverage
oh nice
But it costs more
how much does it cost there?
up here in Norway and Sweden, the state pays for some 98% of your healthcare bill. you still gotta pay a handsome 10-30€ or so, but it's usually not much more than that. this is regardless of your job and insurance; this even applies to private healthcare in Sweden
I found it
if you also spend some reasonable amount of money on healthcare in a year, you get a full refund and 100% free healthcare for the rest of the year. 400€ or something in Norway, limited to public healthcare. don't know what it is in Sweden
I live in New England which is VERY left leaning, but also in maine which is half far right,and half far left
there are definitely other solutions to what Argentina currently does. my Swedish taxes currently also lie at 24%, so it's nowhere as much as argentinians pay
Not the premium plan. The premium is what we call how much you pay
woah thats a lot
Yup
Which is why so many find trouble being able to afford healthcare here
Which is why Obama Care was a thing. A lot of people hated it and many thought it didn’t do anything good, but i never had any experiences with it and don’t know enough about it.
are there restrictions applied to healthcare companies? maybe the problem lies there
300 dollars
Per month or year?
month
year?
Yes
i can start eating sushi instead of noodles haha
The problem is— (if this comes off racist I don’t mean it in that way) —Argentina itself is poor
The country doesn’t have as large an economy as the US, so there isn’t as much to go around.
not racist in any way, thats a true statement of reality
Ok
Good
And from what I’m hearing— I don’t know enough to state this as a fact, only prose — it seems the government of Argentina isn’t seeming to be doing much about it.
And that’s why you’re so against building new houses.
Because the country just simply doesn’t have enough money to let alone feed the people.
Yes
What’s their name...
Umm
Jess
Kezz prolly came from a country which does have a larger pool of money.
Crazy thing they openly stated on TV that inflation is not a monetary phenomenon
Which is why that confused them. I’ve only lived in a world where getting I don’t worry about where I’m going to get my meal from.
That’s why I asked you more questions. To understand the state of which your country is in economically.
Also you are correct. Inflation is literally a monetary problem
I think that even if we were a rich country, making houses for the poor would not be a solution, but to lift restrictions to poor states so they can open business.
That makes sense
In America after they gained independence the big problem was taxes.
It’s very difficult to strike the balance of having enough money to be able to help the people and taking all the people’s money
Which is what Britain was doing to a point.
Also inflation could just be they are really bad at monitoring and printing money.
What restrictions do they have?
oof
In us they are abouuut I think like 13 I’m not sure tho
its a large list
Because of their history with taxes crippling people’s well-being in the early years... that’s why we have Republicans who are so against all the taxes.
this is with universal healthcare, free universal education, subsidised housing for youth, etc. though
Ok. We don’t have universal healthcare in the states tho
lot of companies get broke because of "workers rights" so there is low employment because of that
indeed, so it's hardly comparable, which is entirely understandable
opening a business in argentina is suicidal
You say ‘universal healthcare’ and half the people oppose it strongly and the other half are fighting harder. Most of the people who fight against it are worried that it will both increase taxes and decrease quality... which it does at least by a bit
?
Explain workers rights
you have to pay like 12 years of work to people if you fire them
imaginate that + covid
That’s broken
everyone got broke
That’s gonna drive anyone into the ground
politics say the problem of argentina are big corpos but literally they arent getting any money from argentina and they are leaving to brasil
mercadolibre has like 60% of the economy and they are losing money here
the president thinks capitalism is the problem of argentina so he is going more and more to communism
yes i heard of big corpos dominating some states
Maybe Apple, cough cough, you could use some of that apple tax to help some other countries who need it
wallmart mcdonalds?
No
Those are the ones you prolly hear about
McDonalds doesn’t have a monopoly it’s just popular. A McDonald’s costs like a 100 a year to run I think
i heard apple had factories in communist countries which workers are paid 1 dollars a month
It’s the most expensive of the chains to run
I’m not sure about that... I they’re still under US regulations so I think they’d get in more trouble if they did.
Oh wow
That’s a lot for a job at McDonald’s
Most people who work at Fast Food places are high schoolers, are payed the minimum wage legal, and don’t work for very long.
The big monopolies that are the problems
Are Amazon, Disney, and umm who else
There is one more
oh yeah i heard amazon was a meme and there was a south park series of it
about the bad threating of workers
Microsoft in the early 2000s but Bill Gates learned his lesson.
Oh I didn’t know about that part.
But yeah the whole thing around a monopoly is that they can pretty much do whatever they want (legally) without repricussions
They have machines that do that
I’m pretty sure
i hope
The people who are there are running the machinery
Now about their pay I wouldn’t doubt any discrepancies there
Example, on a smaller scale, Apple can charge whatever they want for some of their accessories because they have control over them
Example of that they can charge $700 for the wheels on their PCs because no one else can make them
lucky enough it isnt a real monopoly but yeah its a big problem
Amazon can sell produce for cheaper than everyone else and can literally run grocery stores out of business
Yes
But Amazon has a better infrastructure built
Never heard of it
in argentina there is only one company that can give electricity to houses
Mhmm
you know what that means?
They can charge whatever they want
And take advantage of their buyers and do whatever low quality t— oh shoooooot
That’s not good
we had no electricity for some days
luckily it didnt went off again for 3 days
and we have electric cooker
thing is real monopolies are worse than you think
So here is what I see. Monopolies work differently where I live than where you live
i hope you dont ever suffer this kind of behaviours
yes
The threat for us is that monopolies drive out local business and can ramp up unemployment.
well the difference is that in argentina already drive out local business
so its like a more advanced state of monopoly
That’s what we’re trying to avoid.
I would argue a different type of monopoly. The two places we live are structured economically very different. But your monopolies are definitely more severe in what they are allowed to do to you
Ours just give us 1st world problems most of the time. Sometimes tho they can make the economy far less stable and control what we consume
Then comes the issue of Disney controls what we consume...
dollar price goes down by 5%
first world countries: oh nooo we are dying
south america: 😎👍
The big scare in the us is still communism, and the worry is that it’ll get to a point where the companies drive out all the others to a point where it reaches BnL from Wall E or a Chinese government censorship thing but controlled by companies
The whole communism scare really comes from the remnants of the Red Scare back in the fifties, but in a different form.
i think that the only way companies can get this kind of behaviour is thanks to democracy
i mean, behind the curtains there is always restrictions preventing small business to compete with this big companies
Which is a problem because last time we focused too much on one threat— communism— thousands of people were killed and the fbi just ignored all of the reports of the people who were planning before it happened
Why— because they aren’t Russian they’re not gonna hurt us
What did they do? 9/11
Yup
When you focus too much on one thing you lose focus
In that case they ignored the reports of a terrorist group rising because they were worried the remnants of the soviets would attack
Also: entirely unrelated
My Uncle spent two years living in Argentina when he was 19-21 years old
I think two of my father’s brothers did, but I’m not certain. I’m only sure about one.
I feel like something should be done about that.
Only problem the US is too afraid of war to do anything about it. And most governments would be too afraid of the company
There are ways to make self sustaining electricity dynamos that are relatively accessible
Prolly not as much as the company can provide but still something.
The problem is that argentina like communism
The people is contaminated
Peron was like a "light communist" president and indoctrination was done. There is people defending him because he gifted stuff to the poor and the books talk about him like he was a god.
But no one talks about the inflation boom that he generated, the explosion of poverty and corruption
Oop ohhh noooo
That’s not good
Atleast we are not as bad as Venezuela with chavez, it makes me sad to hear him expropiating businesses...
Communism and fascism are not good
the old videos of him saying "expropiese!"... all the families that have lose their jobs
That’s so sad
I think people need to be taught about
Y’know
The dangers of radicalism
By the way whats the difference between fascism and communism?
I mean they are both state controlled right?
What are the two political parties in Argentina
"peronism" and "anti-peronism" but they are both communist and vote the same laws haha
well not anti-peronism just.... i dont know... the same
the leader of that political party said peron was good so...
Oop
Ok
So the country seems to be very left leaning then
Ooh no nationalists....
I only say oh no
Yeah it can lead to bad things....
Because there was a similar party in the US back in the 1800s that was umm
Basically almost caused a civil war
They were basically the fundamentists of the constitution
You still want me to explain the differences between communism and fascism?
Ok
Both bad
Communism is good in theory
I guess so is fascism is too in other ways
But both are horrible in practice
Communism is more like left leaning of the two. Everybody is the same. Everybody should have equal opportunity no more no less. There is a class system I think but it’s ehhhh not good.
Everybody works together to help the people
All these ideas aren’t bad.
There are some times in history, LDS church being persecuted, when that was the only way they were able to survive.
It wasn’t communism tho
It was more religious socialism
If you look it up go to their website everything else on the internet about their church is very bias against them and in my experience not true or miscontruing of information
hmm that doesnt seem good on theory either, people is different and thats part of their nature
Yeah
The good in theory part is that everybody works together
And if you have surplus you can donate it to people who weren’t able to be that fortunate
That’s essenstially what happened with the church thing I was talking about.
THE CHURCH THING I AM REFERRING TO IS NOT COMMUNISM IT WAS MILD SOCIALISM AFTER THEY WERE DRIVEN OUT OF PLACE AFTER PLACE
But where it splits is in communism
It’s forced upon you
And you don’t have a choice
Also the gov has control over who gets what and the gov has very little limitations and corrupt people usually gain power and all the surplus and more goes to the leader who doesn’t need it
Examples
Cuba, North Korea, and the Soviet Union
The good in theory gets canceled out by the very real life problem of corruption
Communism works in Minecraft. I’ve done it before. It worked
But in real life people’s lives are on the line and the ‘throne’ often falls into the wrong hands
but doesnt people work together in capitalism too?
Yeah but no
i mean business depends on other business right?
Those two are oppisites
In communism everything goes to the gov economically and they spread it out
The gov has a monopoly over everything
And can control everything
ie: Censorship in China
woah
they ignore the results
And if you aren’t convinced of the dangers of communism
In China at one point the gov would force people to have abortions if they had already had a child
didnt they kill their already alive childrens?
And nobody thought anything of it becuase the gov had taught then that that was the way
That I do not know
omg
But that is a thing. In ... shoot
so there is a point of no return?
What’s it called
Hmm
I’m not sure
Y’all don’t seem as far deep into it as China tho
China is successful which is one of the reasons they are able to keep it communism
Also
The fact that you are able to have this conversation with me that is anti communism is good.
That def shows that you aren’t at the point of no return. The point of no return is when ideas are fed to you and everything is controlled to convince you to think that submitting into horrible things is normal
I misread. Yeah. There is prolly. But eventually things fall apart. The soviets fell apart
But Russia just kinda went into another not very good state of being........
Time to explain fascism?
I can do that one too. This one is a lot easier because they taught me in history more about WWII than they did the Cold War.
The only reason I really knew about most of the Cold War stuff is conversations with people who lived in those times. ie: i had a choir conductor who was realllly old
sure, sorry i am cooking... noodles of course
Noice
All good
I was able to get my electric guitar fixed while I waited
I built it myself so it just breaking randomly isn’t too out of the question
Fascism is similar
But farther to the right
Side of the spectrum of politics
Umm
I think
Oooooooohhhh
Shoot
Now I see where this came from
So you know earlier I meantioned how radical nationalism is bad
So the economy
This is what I know off of wiki and US and World History
This as in nazis
My brain goes a million miles a minute
So:
Fascism: examples, the nazi nation... aannd
Well shoot
Apparently some people say Brazil....... I don’t think that’s necessarily true.
But apparently their latest president is at least a bit fascist
Sorry I got sidetracked
So. Fascism is ‘ultranationalist’
Essentially undying loyalty for their country
An example being the nazis believing that Germany was the best country ever and all others are dumb.
Their economic structure is like the opposite to communism
Theirs is focused on corporations
The bigger the better.
If I were to chose either I would chose neither
Chose democracy with good leaders. All systems have their flaws, but democracy isn’t the cause of monopolies. Because if it’s a democracy you should be able to say hey government this monopoly is causing us harm. Also the idea of democracy comes from the idea that the government is just an extension of the people
The government doesn’t rule the people, the government is the way the people organize themselves and get things done
But don’t fall into the trap that the French did and fall right into another government that didnt care
wait i dont think bolsonaro is fascist he seems more like libertarian
and christian
more like.... the classic conservative
he is calling for companies from other countries to go to brazil, so i think thats not really nationalist
mercadolibre which leads the market in argentina is now doing great business there, and its probably leaving argentina soon haha
anyways, what do you think about anarchocapitalism?
I mean its wrongly called anarcho but there are rules like the non aggression pact
and the terms in general of private stuff
Have you ever seen the Pixar movie Wall-E?
yeah
Yeah that makes sense
but that seems more like communism
That’s the worry with complete capitalism
Well
Actually not necessarily it was a company not a government
if that were capitalism a company would be created to seek for solutions to the global warm and trash right?
Communism is government owns all the companies not company is the government
Here’s the thing
The moral thing to do isn’t the most profitable
Moral or better for the environment
yeah, the only way to get a company to do good for the world is if people cares about the world
That’s why it’ll take such a long time to convert to sustainable
but thats the point, if people didnt care about the world in wall-e that probably means it wasnt that important
If the people running the companies
Yeah
They didn’t value it
otherwise they would fight with the company
Yeah
But if the company controls your source of everything, batteries, power, food, appliances
At that point you can’t
hmm i dont think thats possible as long as there is no goverment restricting people
Id put fascism more akin to what china is doing now
i mean if 50% of the people starts disliking the company they will probably make their own like it was done in the past against kings and when people had nothing
aren’t they communism tho
fascism is part socialist
pretty much to some degree, you have to be aligned by the communist party in order to own a business
nazi germany pretty much made that a rule also
... ehhhhh that makes sense i guess but a massive part of fascism is being rediculously to the right ...
But yeah I guess that makes sense
Yeah. The difference tho is that government is the company in Wall E the company is the government
Very similar tho
They both serve the same function
@fair iris what companies?
depends on the state, size of the company, and how much the company can throw at the state/lawyers
Yeah.
A company doing that would be very unlikely
Cuz laws and crap
Not crap
Jazz
Sry i had to
I mean not really, socialism is about class warfare, fascism is about class collaboration, if you read the mussolini and gentile's doctrine of fascism they say that their ideology is the opposite of socialism the whole way through
Such a conception of life makes Fascism the resolute negation of the doctrine underlying socalled scientific and Marxian socialism, the doctrine of historic materialism which would explain the history of mankind in terms of the class struggle and by changes in the processes and instruments of production, to the exclusion of all else.
Fascism is therefore opposed to Socialism to which unity within the State (which amalgamates classes into a single economic and ethical reality) is unknown, and which sees in history nothing but the class struggle. Fascism is likewise opposed to trade unionism as a class weapon
Mussolini was certainly in favor of inequality as he said that fascism asserts the irremediable and fertile and beneficent inequality of men , do you think any socialist would agree with that?
Dick Cheney made money of the Iraq war
he certainly did
Another support of what @warm ibex said
The Soviet’s fought technically with us in WWII against the Nazi’s because they were against their ideology
Soviets fought nazis in ww2 because they got invaded and millions of their citizens were slaughtered and their land burned lol
Soviets actually worked with nazis before they backstabbed them
So wouldn't use that as an example
Okie
Well their ideology was the exact opposite is the point
But their methods were similar and we just clump the two together cuz bad
The Soviets didn't fight the Nazis because of ideology, they fought them because they had invaded the Soviet union. Before Barbarossa, the Soviets thought of them as allies because of there non aggression pact and were sending oil/steel to the Germans to help there war effort. And they had a joint occupation of Poland.
The US didn't fight them because of ideology either, no one knew about the camps until later and a decent chunk of the US agreed with their views in general
We probably would have fought them eventually to help the UK but Japan dragged the US in to the war
Not necessarily
the spanish civil war was a proxy war between the soviets and the nazis
that could be considered on the basis of ideology
although later on the soviets eventually betrayed the anarchists, being marxist leninists and all

lol
how does that have anything to do with soviets vs nazi germany in ww2
because it shows they opposed each other ideologically?
the nazis also pushed the judeo bolshevik myth and hitler called marxism a "jewish doctrine"
Cultural Bolshevism (German: Kulturbolschewismus), sometimes referred to specifically as art Bolshevism, music Bolshevism or sexual Bolshevism, was a term widely used by Nazi German-sponsored critics to denounce modernist and progressive movements in the culture.
This first became an issue during the 1920s in Weimar Germany, when German artists ...
NEW YORK CITY, NY - CNN's hit show Reliable Sources has just released a blockbuster report on something Fox News reported regarding CNN's recent reporting of a Fox News report. 'Wait until you hear what Fox News said about CNN,' said Brian Stelter tearfully to the camera. 'In last night's report, Tucker Carlson repeated ...
Good stuff here
I did always think it’s kinda funny when news orgs report on what other news orgs say. 🤷
That’s common here too, but sometimes it’s reporting literally on what they said, and how they said it or smth
Reporting on a news orgs commentary on something
Instead of reporting the underlying story, and mentioning it was reported by whoever
I mean, your landscape is so fucked, I can see how it is of interest for a viewer of one side to learn how a topic is portaid on the other side
Helps you understand more background when speaking with ppl that primarily consume such content
But yeah, it's mostly stupid
:raised_hands: Warned Denis#7129 (#738890587721302097 isn't a meme channel) [1 total infraction] -- MiniDigger#3086.
mfw mini is mere seconds too fast
:raised_hands: Warned Denyell#2004 (Politics is not a meme dump) [1 total infraction] -- Proximyst#6900.
we'll fix the warning, Denis! sorry :/
Can you fix, am on mobile
Thanks :)
This is a discussion channel, not your Instagram page
If you wanna start a discussion do it properly, not dumping a list of memes
As an European, all I can say it's a shit show
Ah yes
Nice discussion
should stop acting like global police and stay neutral in foreign affairs
should also start rapidly moving toward a more democratic and labor centered economy
Someone has always tried to act like world police, I suspect if the US really did pull back on all of that Russia and China would just move in
They already are so this is an easy bet
The brits were doing it before the US and before that it was a mix of UK, France, and Spain
I moved here(U.S.) from Australia a few years ago, and U.S. politics is just 😩
I Like Australian politics better
yeah but like, we're spending trillions of dollars in these countries that don't pose any threat to us that we could be spending improving the lives of american citizens
I agree, but we are also improving the lives of people in the other countries
there are other ways to do that rather than interfering in foreign conflicts whenever we feel like it
and sometimes we don't improve the lives of people, we make them worse
look at iraq and libya
what if Russia intervened, it would be alot worse
I agree that the US has done bad, but there are also good aspects of it aswell
well i don't like russia but it's not like the us is right and russia is wrong every single time
He's better than the alternative, that's all you can ever get with US politics
Stop watching so much Newsmax
Trump took all the ppe from NE and send it downsouth
What news source do you read/watch
Keemstar probably
Just fox?
Yeah, fighting for people named Trump
lol they follow keem on twitch
I just dont like eather anyway lol
seems to be speaking correctly
I think in general thinking any of the currently in power politicians are fighting for people is heavily misguided. People on both sides tend to do this. While someones policies and actions may appeal to a specific group of people that doesn't necessarily mean that they are.
so far your only criticisms of Biden are adhoms
This applies to Trump, Biden, Sanders, AOC.
I think biden has done good so far with getting out vaccines
They just want power, and the more people allow them to get that without delivering their promises the more the world will go to shit.
btched?
What about trump reopening early, and spreading covid faster
inflation is not going up any more then the control rate
gas prices rised because of a cyber terrorism attack on a pipeline
and gas prices have NOTHING to do with the president
The vaccine rollout has been steady since it started to be honest.
even if this was true, you're fine with 3,300,300 (1% of us population) dying?
You can also get covid multiple times
because you said the country should have never shut down because of a 99% survival rate?
implying that you don't care about the 1%
What does the death rate have to do with the question posed?
It might be 1% everytime your exposed, but ifyour being exposed 100s of times
That’s probably gonna kill someone
Its better then dying
I mean, that's not Biden
Restaurants and such were going to die anyway, I think Sweden was a good example for that
The president has little control over what individual jurisdictions do
If we closed down when covid first started, it wouldnot be as big
The argument Trump did this, Biden did this, when the jurisdiction is that of states or cities is just uneducated
They didn't do a required lockdown and instead just got most of their population to take it seriously and people still didn't go out to eat or to the movies and such
Dr Fauci has no power
They ended up with just as much of an economic hit as their neighbors who did lockdowns too
you cite the cdc and you're against fauci?
Regarding lockdown's, absolutely he doesn't.
Fauci is an advisor