#politics
1 messages · Page 66 of 1
I mean honestly the teachers unions showed during covid just how bad they could be by actually shutting schools down even against the science.
I mean, it's defo far from a magical fix, but it puts power into peoples hands to at least be able to gtfo out of failing schools
I mean if nurses and doctors are going to work, teachers need to go too. Schools are just as important as hospitals and grocery stores.
I mean, that's a fun and critical issue that I see for america is the over unionisation of stuff
Agreed. I think people should have freedom of association, but I also think teachers unions have too much power.
You often hear from people about critical services like education or the police, that the fact that everything is unionised often causes many complex issues with moving anywhere
I like the fact that people can team up and stuck an FU to their workers for their own rights
I never quite understood why this didn’t take hold. Education is that important
But, there is defo concerns over power
How often do you hear about stories where some officer ended up murdering somebody on the job, and we find out that the force tried to let him go but the union protected his ass
And while online can attempt to be an adequate substitute, it hardly is the same. Especially for younger kids
I mean, I know it's anecdotal and such, but, I mean, it's worrying
Oh it was horrible.
HORRIBLE
without education there'd be no doctors or nurses
My brother is being held back a year.
Education today is not what it was when I went to school. We couldn’t cut up without getting straightened out. Most kids now can scream, fight, and even disrespect teachers without getting any repercussions
I mean that's the thing, they're still wondering how much this year is going to impact us as a whole
Cause of my TBI, I know all the special-ed and behaviorally challenged kids. All this online and hybrid education has seriously affected them.
That's like the most common boomer take I ever read lol. "Its cuz we cant hit our kids anymore"
I seriously think that this generation of students has suffered the most of any American generation since WWII.
I didn’t say hit kids, though
in my school if you're in a fight, whether you're defending yourself or not, you get suspeneded
there are other forms of discipline
This is the whole “the country swings wildly in different directions to compensate for the past” thing, and always misses the sweet spot. Teachers used to be able to beat kids essentially, and that’s not good, but they have to be in charge of the classroom.
Idk what schools you see but you get detention, expelled, sent home, etc. For being an asshole in class
Yeah, a lot of the poor schools are bad because they have no discipline or they just pass kids a long.
So now the kids and parents run the classrooms, and so it’s chaotic
and that's the thing, last I saw the science indicated that children where the lest likely to have any real issues from it or even likely to transmit it, and now many of them have lost a year of building up their immune systems, a year or socialisation at a critical time step, for some, even just getting away from deadbeat parents
My school really hit home the "if ur gonna be an ass whatever just dont interfere with others learning" message
I understand that. But I never mentioned beating on kids. No one was in the time I grew up.
Yes! CPS almost always identifies issues through the school system
nowadays the us has a school to prison pipeline and it's fucked
and that's another thing, the wussification of parents
Well yes, that’s the “sweet spot” I was taking about. Public opinion always misses it, and so we just slam into the guardrails, and turn back the other direction
But my point was better explained by Machine, stating that teachers have little control of classrooms.
Well, that's a horrible way to say it, but, parents these days just don't seem to care
Ah, I misread, apologies
I remember when I was young, if I had a temper tantrum, I'd know about it, I'd get my ass whipped or i'd be gounded and shit like that
I get that parents don't wanna hit kids these days, and to a degree, I support it
but there's alternate forms of punishment
the usual punishments i see are getting put in the hallway for 5 minutes or taking away electronics
But, I mean, I remember when 2 weeks gounded was 2 weeks
I read recently about goodhearts law, which is about when you make a goal, society will optimize towards reaching that goal, even at the expense of making things worse.
Look at graduation rates, states want to have the highest one, but if that is the goal, then what do you naturally do to increase your grad rate? You make it easier to graduate.
YES!
now 2 weeks is basically 2 days
Not allowed outside, not allowed on the console, not allowed on the PC, not allowed to play in my room, etc
Precisely.
A long time ago, the British put bounties on cobras in Africa cause there were too many, and so the people living there started breeding more of them
Stupid brits :p
Before I left, a punishment was being grounded from going outside, still being allowed on the console and such
Gotta love em 🙂
Well, you have to pick a good goal, and that usually isn’t an arbitrary number. Like highest graduation rate
You want the most best educated graduates
Four Yorkshiremen discuss "the bad old days" and how young people don't properly appreciate what their elders had to go through. Hilarious.
he'd throw controllers across the room in rage at his games, trash headsets, he'd still get a replacement by the end of the month, even if it meant less food in the cupboard
and, it's one of the biggest arguments against affirmative action
Yes, you get more POC into college, but
you're setting these people up to fail
Cool, they get in, they get loans to pay for it, but then they drop out because they figure that it's not for them
The real fix for college diversity is better K12 education.
Now you have a population which is already massively overresented in povertry stricken areas yet another bill to worry about and nothing in return for it
Also those areas are often not safe too 😦
The problem is that we'd sooner measure to the books rather than actual effects
YYay, we've increased college admissions towards these people!
When I went to my kids high school graduation, I noticed something pretty alarming. The principal was bragging about the fact that almost 400 students out of 750+ had 4.0 average GPA’s. But when the students later had to stand for a certain grade on an aptitude test, only 6 stood up. How do you have that many people supposedly getting straight A’s throughout high school, but they couldn’t get what was considered an “Excellent” score on an aptitude test?
The curve didn’t match. This is the type of scaling mentioned previously, to make numbers seem higher when the reality is they were just easier.
Dear lord
oh god
Stop it please
"democrat socialism" 
Not a good interruption
Not a good interpretation of current events
!ban 854791067727036457 pump and dump is not welcomed in politics
:raised_hands: Banned AaronBurr#8964 (pump and dump is not welcomed in politics) [1 total infraction] -- electronicboy#8869.
thank you
Was that a new account didnt get a chance to see
yes, 3 hours ago


I guess I'm on thin ice too, joined like 15 minutes ago
the leftover messages are actually really funny 👀
But, yea, I mean it's the big issue where statistics are the primary focus rather than actual outcome
||naomi wishes somebody would pump and dump her||
oh god
Everyone was clapping, I was the only one baffled and alarmed by it. They were celebrating something that was not even remotely good
I mean, it's the issue, very few people are willing to actually speak about or even stand up for this type of crap
no ||i would like to be cuddled or have my head crushed by thighs (preferably girl thighs)||
preach
same

I think that's a modern issue where people aren't willing to say, you failed
That's interesting. I'm really glad I never went through the public school system, looking at it from a third person perspective, it's really screwed up in a lot of ways
I believe people should be presented their failures to learn upon them.
Yes. It's just that doing it in a constructive way is very hard 😦
I think it's fair to fail, I don't think failing should be a negative mark so long as you tried
Not everybody has the brain for maths
not everybody has a penchant for classic english literature
I think in a modern age we have the tech to conteract a good chunk of our own inefficiences
As long as it’s shown in a positive environment it should be fine. It’s the negative connotation that people perceive as destructive and not constructive.
Unfortunately we aren’t optimizing for it. We are leaving it as it was, instead of leveraging the ability to work around it
I think that it's okay to not be good at something, maths is especially one of those areas in which peoples brains aren't all that good with
The thing is is that we KNOW and have proven that peoples brains work different between individuals and that some things like a penchant for maths is not really something that is inheriently teachable
and yet in the education system, we refuse to accept that as the reality and think that high scores is a must for everything
it's part of why I hope that as a group of generations, we push to do better than our forefathers
I think school as we know it shouldn't continue past the age of around 15, unless you show aptitude and/or interest in more advanced careers. There are so many real life skills that could be taught from 15 to 18 that would help so many people start out in life. I see so many people go to college without motivation or goals. Most people will never need to know advanced biology, chemisty, etc.. those who were interested could start out in trade schools or apprenticeships.. I wish the system was designed to be more accepting towards those who want to start working on their future earlier, while keeping options open for those who want to improve their education. But you guys are right, it's all about numbers, higher numbers means more money, and all anyone cares about is money.
I think sadly a good chunk of the current governance around the world is just a toxin on the very systems they manage, but, I think that we need to enact the changes we feel that we need, but, I'm worried that those who strive for power will just continue on the same harm, or basically completely neglect the people they wanna help to enforce their own ideals
College was meant to make you a more rounded and knowledgeable individual. Knowing chemistry is still a good thing, even if you don’t plan on being an expert. Same for everything else.
I think that education is important, but, not everything needs to be graded
But I agree, there needs to be a way to locate your abilities and extract them earlier on. I know Germany was pretty good at this, last I ever read on their education system.
Like, children as a whole are often naturally willing to learn new stuff and are often interested in it
yet, we beat that out of them with continous testing and constant stress of failure
my feelings exactly
i hate having to stress for school because i know that if i don't perform well people will be disappointed in me and i don't want that :)))
Also, I noticed that school as of recently, only teaches you based off of a curriculum, which follows a certain guideline. The problem, is they don’t always teach you the correct information, but because you got the “basics”, you’ll adapt fine. And this is very wasteful, imo
Yea, it's why I think that things like history being a graded/tested subject is inheriently dangerous
Thank all of you for the conversation, it's nice to talk with intelligent people
I mean, think about it, we have things like youtube which allows things to be posted
I’m not entirely sure I know what you mean, clarify? Because that’s how history gets changed
recounts of people who actually lived in the war and such
I mean,history is always going to be double sided
i mean having history be an oral exam instead of stamping on facts
Tomas eddision invented the lightbulb
That would be even more biased then the current curriculum though
not that it isn't important
I mean, the idea is that you pull in a diversity of material
not all recounts are gonna be even remotely suitable for it
But, I'd much rather spend 20 minutes listening to the recounts of somebody who lived on rationing and what it was like, rather than a technical list of what people had and such
I’ve always been a fan of the fact-based history, but i don’t know how the other ways would work
I think fact based is important but fact based often discredits many other aspects of it
"History is written by the victors". A truer fact has never been spoken. American curriculum tends to skim over all the terrible things that have been done in American history, focusing more on Nazis and Communism, at least the curriculum I took
I mean sure, we learned of our history, but it was framed in a totally different light
I mean, history is probs not a super great "youtube it" type thing for a lot of material, but, there is.a lot of documentaries which go into the aspects of stuff which we never even knew
Like, I was about 20 years old when I learned that somebody actually managed to get a bomb in a suitcase into the room of a nazi meeting with the leader but that basically failed
I think that’s where the shift of information happened. Because, I was taught an extreme amount about other countries and their history rather than just simply the US History.
I guess they probably split that up?
I somewhat don't remember all too much about it as I live in the UK, most of our history lessons where primarily focused on the wars and such, bit of UK history, but, not much all beyond that afaik
I'm just saying, I learned about the US bombing Hiroshima, (it was justified though because they blew up a few of our boats), and I learned about how many natives were killed (also justified because it was a long time ago), but I never heard about the unethical tests done on US civilians by the FBI! I didn't learn about that until I was out of school. There are so many things that have happened even in the last 50-100 years that are so beyond justification that they just skip over them, I guess? Or maybe my curriculum was just jaded, I don't know.
I mean, part of the horrors of history is retrospect
We KNOW these days that both of the atomic bombs where not needed and the japanese millitary likely wouldn't of lasted much longer
But, at that time, it ended the war
the dutch school system has you go from 3000 BC to current 3 times in your primary/secondary school career, so they're quite thorough curriculum wise
it's the one thing that concerns me about fact based history is that you often look at the facts based on the victors
You're not really taught that japan was already close to losing
So, as far as many are concerned, the US did good for ending the war which would of raged on for years more
But, if you learn that the japanese likely wouldn't of lasted much longer in the war, you question why the fuck the US had to go OTT on it and murder so many civillians
My curriculum had me alternate between regions/times yearly, sort of. Every other year I had World History, and in between it would be more localized, US History, Medieval times in Europe, the Renaissance <-- I remember those 3 most vividly
You don't really learn the emotions or what was going on under the surface, and that's why I think to a large part, we're doomed to repeat our failures
facts
yeah, most of my history stuff is explaining why you think things happened based on a couple sources
I remember that
not the best way, but it's better than asking what happened in this year
It's good to talk to older people too, when I was 15 our family doctor and I kind of became friends, and he'd take me flying and driving around. We talked about school, politics, medicine, everything he was into.. it was a really fulfilling experience for both of us
the problem i have is putting my thoughts into words so i'm a really bad debate/discussion partner :p
It's why I hate that much of this stuff is assessed
Like, with stuff like medical stuff, yea, you gotta know wtf you're talking about
But, when it comes to things like history, unless you're one of the people tryna dig it up and such, I think that history is better learned rather than tested
Like, how many years do we spend relearning the exact same history more or less with a bit of extra stuff thrown in there because hey we're a year older now to the degree that the lessons just become tiring
If debates were through written text, and everyone had 30 minute slowmode, it would be perfect. All responses would be long and thought out, you would have time to address each point, and no one would have the opportunity to present new arguments before you'd adressed the last ones
What's with the weird edgy conservative memes today 
!ban @shy gulch politics is not a memes channel
:raised_hands: Banned alphasocke#7866 (politics is not a memes channel) [1 total infraction] -- electronicboy#8869.
funny how that meme isn't even true
^
Urgh it happens
Typically we either get the right wing nutjobs or the "anybody who even looks to the right is hitler" folks
i found a twitter thread a while back explaining why the covid vaccine was finished so fast relative to other vaccines, but it's in dutch and i cba to scroll
new tech, afaik
but basically: most of the research was already done
Now we can actually easily take a sample of the DNS of the virus and put it into the vaccine in a much quicker manner vs the years of research and development needed to get something just like it quite right
only caveat is that this is the first vaccine of its type to actually be approved for any form of use
afair that's what happened
And it came at a very dramatic political time, there's bound to be hate from both sides
I mean, it went from people not wanting to have it because it was "trumps vaccine"
and now those people who where against it are the one screaming at the people who don't wanna get it
i get where the people who don't want to get it are coming from - it's new and not widely tested
I heave health issues which puts a real caveat on it
note to self: stop using colons when you can use a hyphen
I kinda want it for the whole return to normal factor, and I don't wanna be turned away from outtings with peeps because I didn't get it
But, I mean, I've already been practically bed bound thanks to my health, I'm feeling mostly mentally dead right now, and it scares me that I could prolongue it or make it worse
i don't see a real downside to getting it considering i don't have any health issues that would deter me from getting it
most people that i know are vocal against not getting it are either scared or have some tin foil hats on their head
the issue is the hyper politicization of the vaccine
like, there have been causes where people have died attributed to the vaccine
that is true
But, talking about that can often lead you towards being identified as part of the right leaning looney bin, and so these things are often ignored by some, and screamed about by others, and so you have one side tryna keep it hush and the other shouting off the rooftops who then look over at the silent part of town like, "wait..."
o/
The fact that it was the first mRNA vaccine, mRNA therapies are known to cause autoimmune issues, and the first company to say they had one had been failing for a decade to first that last issue made me wary of it
By the time I was able to get the vaccine enough time had passed and enough people had gotten it to mostly put my worries behind me so I got it
?warn @gilded trench Politics is not for memes
:raised_hands: Warned Kahzi#2407 (Politics is not for memes) [1 total infraction] -- Proximyst#6900.
?
why not?
it's to keep it out of general, and most people here are adults with some political knowledge
You could just look 1 up.
Because we're adults and adults like to discuss political views.
but...this is just a block game
why will someone...nvm
Ok, don't participate then
Well. We aren't discussing the block game.
wait im participating
If this server had been strictly block game, we wouldn't have taco supremacy, kittens, and Taylor Swift either
hmm
lets talk about why are companies just switching to SIMPLIFIED LOGOS
as its good in some cases
but every thing has a yin and a yang
it's yin and yang
apparently there's talk about taxing meat
as part of a new climate ruleset
Haven't they been talking about that for years now
probably, haven't kept up with it though
Maybe in a decade it will actually happen
With the current leading party, I doubt this will happen
yeah
i don't think they would do it unless there's massive public backlash after not passing it
Yeah, but I don't think there's gonna be much backlash if they don't do this tbh
sadly
taxing meat is fucking stupid
it is, especially considering lots of farmers here don't have a successor
and because it is in the netherlands many people will just go to belgium or germany to buy their shit
it also won't have any positive effect on emissions
although it is true that the meat industry is responsible for around 15% of emissions (got that number in my head from somewhere), completely avoiding meat would only reduce emissions by 2,6%
that is still something
because most animal food isn't stuff people can digest but rather stuff like grass or other byproducts of farming
well, instead of pushing veganism it would be way more effective to push for more renewable energy production
animals make the entire food chain way more efficient
taxing meat is part of it
Green parties will probably still push for that 2.6% reduction, though
yea but that idea is stupid af
because you can invest it way more wisely
also, only around 1/3 of all land can be used to grow plants, meaning you can't do much else on the other 2/3 of the land except for animal stuff
veganism won't solve climate change
veganism doesn't save anything tbh
but i think making it more attractive to pick a vegetarian option might have a small effect
2,6% reduction of emissions if the entire population goes vegan
and higher food prices
so it's not really worth it
of course
it's not a real thing yet
they're still going to have a debate over it
for a couple months 👀
it's probably going to be limitations for companies and more clean energy plans
well, you don't need a meat tax to do that
i think i remember denmark implementing a fat tax and it went horribly
It'd take me 1.5 hours to get to Germany to do groceries, I doubt many people will go to Germany because of this
well, people at the border will definitely go over to germany and buy their shit there
and local businesses will have huge deficits
the only thing people go to germany or belgium for is fireworks 
Local businesses may actually see a visible boost, but larger businesses probably not much.
No single action will solve climate change. It's not that simple, lol
(Not a vegan)
We need actions in every single part of our live to make a difference
Going vegan-ish (i.e. for the most part; fully vegetarian at least) is more to just make a small gesture with a lot of health benefits in my case. Often, the change to help the planet more is fairly easy and cheap to do, and it's just about seeking them out when possible ^^
BREAKING: The Supreme Court rejects the constitutional challenge to Obamacare in 7-2 opinion. The court tosses the lawsuit because the challengers do not have legal standing to sue. https://t.co/meuQgPE50Z
1168
2309

Not the best way to keep it but HEY at least it's kept!
Wow I really thought Gorsuch and Thomas were going to get their chance to destroy the court's severability case law
kavanaugh and barrett joined the majority too
Wow it was Alito on the other side, not Thomas
damn communist Texans
Oh, the case turned in to California v Texas because when the Fifth Circuit overturned the severability argument from a lower court but kept the ruling that the individual mandate was now unconstitutional California led several other states intervened to argue against that
The Court's reasoning for standing is kind of hilarious
Texas says it's unconstitutional because the "tax" got dropped to $0, Court says since the "tax" is $0 there is no injury
They also make it clear they consider the individual mandate unenforceable now too which is an obvious conclusion, that's why it was set to $0
Neither logic nor evidence suggests that an unenforceable mandate will cause state residents to enroll in valuable benefits pro-grams that they would otherwise forgo.
Kövér Elvtárs
english only please
We've had a community which interacts about stuff outside of block game stuff for years, even before discord was a thing, we can't expect people to change just because we have a discord now, hence the channel; if you're not happy with the discord not just being a block game discord, you are more than welcome to leave
discord centered around block game server can only talk about block game! How dare people in there who have lives outside of block game talk about non block game stuff!
Trying to do things like that just results in all of us hanging out in the NotPaper discord talking about "offtopic" things and ignoring #paper-help and #paper-dev
This isn't a job, it's a community
The community has interests other than block game
I mean, in general talking about political things is mostly a waste of time regardless of where it is. The only real benefit is to discover different ideas and help others discover different ideas. To actually have a meaningful impact you have to run for office and win. Doing anything else and expecting anything other than a superficial result is mostly delusional.
Actively not wanting to be dead is deathphobia, and, therefore, you are deathphobic. Read up on Death Liberation, follow dead activists and creators, and commit to unlearning your deathphobia!
?ban @shy gulch Asshole
:raised_hands: Banned Tom the Schemer#8958 (Asshole) [2 total infractions] -- Proximyst#6900.
spigot thread inc
Discord servers are not communities
this is a discord server for the paper community, of which many people in here have spoken and been friends with one another for years, including discussions about, well, literally everything
there is so much more to this block game than some of these people will even try to understand
like how it got so many of us into learning Java
Notch' influence went way beyond what he ever thought he'd ever do with this game
Regardless of all the bad opinions I have about him, he objectively had a very big impact on many, many people's lives. Although he is himself not a good influence, I can't say he hasn't affected my life in many good ways
Ah yes
wat
If you can't even accept the influence notchs creation (and thus notch himself) had on you, am really sorry for you
He is the reason I got into development, which is now my job. He had a good impact on me, despite his views
Ppl aren't all good or all bad, ppl have different sides, it's a scale, etc
Its not as easy as the twitter mob wants you to think
But I guess Americans don't know better, they are burned by their tails political system that they call a democracy
Wellp, guess I was Influenced by an evil dude as well. O well I guess
The guy said some racist things ok. He said some transphobic things, ok. I personally don't believe he had any bad intentions at all... and I'm sure there are tweets he's written that do away with all of that anyways, so I personally don't believe he's racist or transphobic at all
do you have a view that morality is objective? if not, then this means really nothing to me, tbh
you just think there's tweets he made that made up for it?
like yeah the guy's a twat but even bad people can influence people, even in a positive way sometimes
@near glen linked a video sometime back that goes into detail on Notch's persona and how people have reacted to him https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQOxnhX0D0U
It's no secret that Minecraft creator Markus Notch Persson has become a controversial figure, but is there more to the story than you've heard?
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/OfficialSlushTV
Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/SlushTV_
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/SlushTV_
people today don't do enough justice for themselves and look this much into the people they criticize
it's the sort of thing where, like, you look at this girl and think she's just a triggered person but when you look at the actual source video where this image comes from, you realize that she actually wasn't triggered at all and the image is taken out of context
alright, i finally got round to watching that video after it's been posted in response to notch and it's dumb af - you can't use past actions as evidence against a current and ongoing trend in personality/speech. the idea that because he made some good tweets ages go and that somehow absolves him or muddies the idea of him being bigoted is just wrong, people and their opinions change over time and can't be viewed in some sort of vacuum of current circumstances. we don't have the luxury of being able to judge people based solely on a combination of all the things that they have said, sadly we have to take into account when they said things, how it was received, what their responses were, how they have evolved and changed over time, what they did to ensure a correct interpretation of their thoughts, etc etc.
the point at the end is also dumb and has just boiled down to am argument over semantics, i.e. are you bigoted for holding a hatred/prejudice against people or just for doing/saying bigoted things. more importantly, is the distinction even meaningful or useful when discussing people and the ideas they hold. of course we cannot know for sure what opinions he actually holds, we haven't yet developed mind reading tools. however what we can do is make educated guesses and comment on how an individual's actions would be perceived.
so you've elevated him to the status of hitler, 'grats, I don't think I get to take you seriously anymore
he did come out later with a tepid walk back on that particular statement
Wtf Notch is Hitler?
I love notch now
!kick @shy gulch
Command kick requires 2 argument(s) (<user:user|snowflake> <reason:str...>) passed 1
Rude
Eraser, I don't think I need a reason for that
Still rude
!kick @shy gulch if this is all you want to contribute, don't come back
:raised_hands: Kicked Lurtz#0033 (if this is all you want to contribute, don't come back) [1 total infraction] -- MiniDigger#3086.
I think the entire discussion about trans people is fucked up
One side doesn't recognize the other side's feelings and experiences, the other side calls everyone they don't agree with transphobes
The latter happened to Notch
I am not an expert in Biology but there is still a conversation about gender dysphoria being a mental illness
Notch being on on the other side of the argument suddenly makes him hate all trans people?
This is some fucked up black/white thinking
Either you're with me or you're a transphobe
As I said, nuance is important
Well, social norms also have their benefits in pursuing personal happiness and social stability
Many millenials and gen zs are unhappy, as there is less and less norms to rely on
Yes, I am not against changes in social norms
Holy fuck
You realize that these issues have existed for basically ever, but just now we as a society are mature enough to accept it?
Uff
you're starting to sound a bit tin foil hatty there
First of, as a german I can tell you, stop talking about Hitler if you have no fucking clue
is it just me or is this portraying Hitler as good
Oh suddenly there is nuance?
yeah sorry vinyl but literally the whole of biology/medicine/sociology/psychology and essentially every large health organisations disagrees with you here lmao
we know that hitler was one person most devoid of nuance, or shades of gray
Well, the Weimar Republic after the thirties was pretty fucked and there were many nazi/commie extremists, because gender identity stuff is more left leaning (especially at that time) it would kinda be reasonable to see a connection there, but it definitely wasn't the reason hitler came to power
Well, Hitler hated everyone who was different
Even tho that fuck head wasn't even German, lmfao
Well, Austria kinda is German
It really isn't
Austrian ppl are wwaaay extreme
That's like comparing Texas to California or smth
Well, a majority identified as German at that time, the Anschluss was probably wanted more by the Austrians than the Germans
Sure, they speak the same language, with an accent, but that's about it
But after WW2 less and less Austrians identify as German and a different culture has formed
But culturally speaking Austria is still close to Germany
Yea
!ban @shy gulch fuck off with your political transphobia, not welcome here
:raised_hands: Banned Vinyl#6455 (fuck off with your political transphobia, not welcome here) [1 total infraction] -- aurora#4484.
Does the bot delete messages by banned people? 
seems so
idk i would prefer if he was still on here, since he wasnt a troll, he just had a very negative opposing viewpoint to the rest of us
but i respect all the mods decisions
i personally think we should be trying to get open conversation going, even if its totally against what we all think
oh yeah
that part was kind of stupid
I don’t care about his opinions or whether he was a troll or not, just wanted to see what he was posting
kinda forgot abt that statement by him😅
tldr on his statements: all negative evidence i can find against gender identity
transphobic comments and comments indirectly saying hitler is good
so kind of a troll
Also on another note, while i do understand taking offense to people saying offensive stuff, is cursing in the ban reason really necessary?
eu people like to put swears into most things
source: the entire population of the netherlands between 13 and 24
Idk, the reason field in a ban is for the staff team to remember why that person was banned, if its just meaningless comments like the one above its harder to keep track of
open platforms of speech are better in my opinion, but the guy was a borderline troll and i fully respect any decisions made by the mod team
We change the reason later if it's unclear
yeah they could be made more specific
transphobia is a pretty specific ban reason for us to have
only #politics bans have "unnecessary" additions 👀
to me the ban reason is pretty clear though
political transphobia not welcome here
The initial ban reason is more like a message to the user
We later change them for bookkeeping
Alright then
if they need to be changed, in this case the message is clear enough for everyone in the team to know why the person was banned
Yeah was a general statement
thank you both for clarifying how you moderate
It may be clear enough to you because you were there when it happened, anybody who just randomly see this ban with such a reason has no idea what happened
see reason -> neuron activation -> use given context to think about why they were banned
Why this passive aggressiveness? Im just presenting what is in my opinion a pretty fair argument
if you can't use the reason for a ban to make up the context, idk what to tell you
“fuck off with your political transphobia, not welcome here” sure is a lot of context… especially for staff members who tend to label off quite a broad list of topics as transphobia and ban on sight 
context: hmm maybe the guy was spouting some political transphobic bullshit
Transphobia is a ban reason in our zero-tolerance section in the community guidelines
We do not ban people for disagreeing with us, only if you violate the guidelines

"market place of ideas"
I mean its not like what he said was false that scientist dude who came up with gender was a fucking creep and the two twins later did kill themselves.
it is though - this guy who you're talking about didn't "come up with gender" he was one of several people who invented the concept of a difference between sex and gender at a conference with a whole bunch of other people. additionally, the idea of a differentiation between sex and some sociological "role" was floating around decades before this conference anyway
and besides, outside of western academia the concept of a difference between the biological and the role you play in society has existed for thousands of years before this
what is free speech, is the paper discord being able to ban someone for violating their guidelines
who is saying you said that lmao
Our rules are nicely documented, you don't have to agree with them, you just have to follow them
Well you also cant let anybody spread these borderline terroristic messages in a public fucking forum
The rules have been developed with our community and are widely accepted
Cmon bruh
I do still agree that the staff team is sort of trigger happy here, but in this instance specifically there’s nothing to argue about, the atrocities committed during WW2 have no justification and have no place in a public discussion forum
Just because you can say whatever you want doesn’t mean you should, or is allowed on the platform you’re speaking on
There are however a few dark web websites that I’m sure could accommodate the average neo nazi
Haha kenny said penis 
Well isn’t that quite a sawy from topic
This is mostly a channel for regulars, as in, ppl who have known each others for years at this point and like a place to talk about political topics. It's not a platform to host extremist discussions.
Uff
Let me explain
If you let one Nazi use your platforms, others will join, try to convince other members of your community and undermine everything your community stands for and suddenly you have a community filled with Nazis.
I am German. I know how this works. If you don't stop these views on first sight, they will devour your community.
Don't you guys learn this in school?
This isn't a high school debate channel
Last time I checked high schools debate club didn't have topic like "should we kill all Jews, yes or no?", Lmao
Because that's what Nazis do. Nazis kill.
Also did this guy admit to ban evading or are they just saying dont ban me then give their 6head take
Can't have such easy topics now can we. /s
You would think it's a high school debate channel cuz of how many teenage edgelords come in here trying to fight people on extremist ideas cuz they thinks it's funny
Was it instantly deleted after u posted it?
Auto filter for ableist slurs
"wahhh why won't this community let me talk about nazis and say ableist slurs wahh plss"
Ableism is not welcome here, see our community guidelines
!kick @shy gulch read our community guidelines before you come back, https://papermc.io/community-guidelines
:raised_hands: Kicked guru#6408 (read our community guidelines before you come back, https://papermc.io/community-guidelines) [1 total infraction] -- MiniDigger#3086.
Mmh? It's only broken in the output of the bot on Android, should be fine for him
Would be calling someone dumb be ableistic?
This link no works
To explain this a bit: We do look at account age and how long someone was on the server etc. If someone with a relative new account joins, and only ever writes in politics, and immediately starts talking about Hitler, it's usually a strong indication for a troll. This is a minecraft community in the first place
It's just broken in the bot message on mobile. Here you go: https://papermc.io/community-guidelines
Is saying "I'm fucking blind" when you didn't see/notice something ableism?
Technically yes, but it's not counted in our guidelines. We explicitly state what is allowed and what isn't
I don't think using the r word is bad if you're not using it with offensive intent
It's offensive if you are affected
This whole ableism thing should be about intent
Ableist slurs are words that refer to people with disabilities used as insults
Nah man, there are probably loads of disabled people that couldn't care less if you used it in a funny joke or something
It's always up to context I'd say
The intent and how it was received by the other person
hence why the word filter consists out of like 3 words that are almost exclusively used as insults, everything else is up to context
just because people who aren't offended by a it exist doesn't mean that open communities (such as this) are not better off preventing the usage of said words in order to provide a more comfortable space for those impacted by it
But then again, if the context is insulting someone, then you have ableism
Yea, but the 3 words censored can be used in a non offensive way, hence why censor them

as usual, terms you use to describe yourself if you are affected are something different than other people using them. It's the same with any other bad word ever. Fine as a self description when you are affected, not fine to describe others
As a verified Discord server we have to have certain rules and follow Discords community standards, easy as that
Also, like, we just don't want that here?
I wonder what happens with the screen reader that blind people use if someone says the r word and it gets instantly deleted 
Would it go haywire
Those rules are kinda stupid I think, they totally neglect intent
Context determines whether something is used in a disrespectful way
So with your intent logic someone can say nword cuz they dont mean it to be bad?
in real life, intent is relatively easy to see - this isn't real life and intent is hard and messy and it's easy to backtrack
Are they used now?
some would argue they are, but it's about more than just meaning it's also about usage/etc
fun fact, all of those words are ableist^^
Well, pretty much everyone thinks blacks can say it, so that kinda is a double standard

pls dont say "blacks"
as I said before, self description vs third person description
But anyway
This is not the place to discuss our community guidelines
What's wrong with that
blimey this is like baby's first politeness lesson today
Our community guidelines are the foundation of this community. If you can't adhere to those roles, this community is not the right place for you. In general, I'd really recommend just not using this channel ever and just listening to the minecraft stuff
I don't see what's wrong with that
We can tell
when you say "blacks" you are centering the phrase on the "otherness" and group, when you say black people you are using it correctly, as a description
For the third time: self description vs third person description
You're always free to leave, no one is forcing you to stay here
concern trolling is so boring lmao
isn't that asking a lot from non-native speakers? like how the hell am I supposed to know that
I don't think "blacks" focuses more on "otherness" than "whites" does
Yea and I don't use blacks or whites with offensive intent, so I don't see what's wrong
Ppl shouldnt be required to have a big armor suit for taking part in this community, metaphorically speaking
but one of these groups has been the victim of systematic oppression and the other hasn't
You can go be ignorant in your own servers and irl but not here
nobody is expecting you to - a simple "oh my bad i'll try not to use it again" is fine
And how does that change the word
blimey do we need to get into how society impacts language now
I love how every time something get's discussed in politics it's not actual politics but "why am I not allowed to offend people anymore"
You cant make people try to CHANGE? Wtf!!
Also, whites are openly discriminated in some African countries, not on societal level (like blacks in the us) but rather on a state level
do you know what systematic oppression means
I don't mean to offend anyone
Classic
then I'd suggest to stop talking tbh
if not, id recommend leaving this conversation, learning and reading up on what it is you're talking about and then come back when you actually understand the issues you're trying to discuss here
this channel isn't # politics-help
Maybe politics should become a whitelisted channel like adorable-cats
oh yeah, let's create an echo-chamber
what's political is that i have a cat allergy but love cats 😔
that's what they are called, right?
Nah, I think we just need to keep new accounts out that aren't part of our community yet
that's the real issue here tbh
if it was an echo chamber half of you wouldn't be here lmfao
I never said it is
Nah it's only an echo chamber if my bad takes aren't accepted
"hey we don't allow hate speech and slurs here"
"wow censorship much literally echo chamber"
Also something something snowflakes
you guys really seem to be misunderstanding me here
not directed at you Trig just general 😄
There are actually a lot of people here who are right leaning that dont break community guidelines
I'd honestly love to have this channel removed alltogether but maybe we will look into some sort of time based permission system for the future. So not really a whitelist but "you have to be in this server for x hours before you can write in #politics "
sounds reasonable
Well, assuming you actually read our guidelines, you shouldn't have anything to worry about as long as you adhere to them
Even in the highest level of the staff team
It's only gets like this when new throwaway accounts pay it a visit
i've personally had some lovely discussions here
Usually its sharing links to political news and talking about that shit
unironically yes
ableism is not funny in any way shape or form
let's take a step back, how is any word funny?
so you're not using it with a malicious intention, you're just ignorant
well some notable people here probably feel/felt the same
and they have received their punishment
That's why leaf was muted for a year 
Depends on which definition you use. 
this is like that gif of the guy talking to a brick wall

You are using a term used to described disabled people to insult someone. How do you not get how that is insulting
Again you can be as ignorant, ableist, or racist as you want to your friends just not here how hard is this to grasp
Just google donowall
No one cares what you do with yourself, but you are not alone here
we live in a society, unironically
Because its offensive
Yes, because that's what I think of people that think ableist terms are funny
God will know
god I'm getting tired of this troll. This is not something to discuss here, end of topic
You don't have to understand, just accept it
I don't do educational work for free
You say that but you havent actually comprehended anything anyone's told you for the past hour
So

great, end of topic
The issue is that you don't drop a topic when told so by staff
If all you focus on is labels that's all you'll see
Idk how else to explain what I said it's extremely straightforward
Did they end up sending help though
taking part in this channel isn't a requirement
the ppl that regularly use this channel enjoy it

here we go again...
i mean guru I haven't seen any data from you
nobody is us vs them-ing
you watch way too much dave rubin
you said the marketplace of ideas and you're telling me you don't know who dave rubin is
lmfao ok
why would that be? maybe because there would be massive backlash?
hate speech laws would never happen in the US either
free speech literally doesn't exist
free speech is always limited by other laws
or try screaming "I have a bomb" at an airport, lol
or "I wanna kill the president"
well no mini
its not a threat, am just exercising my right to free speech?
saying that stuff isn't illegal per say
you will be detained and whatever
but you cannot be convicted on that speech itself
at least in the uk you can be convicted for inciting violence (or some hate speech in general)
you could maybe get a search warrant from that and if you had the means to back up those threats in like your house you could then be charged for those crimes
just say you don't really care about minorities already guru lmao
but yeah inciting violence isn't really a thing here unless you conspire
you will get 3 letter agencies at your door however
i mean i think our speech laws save us in more ways than hurt
what do they save you from?
like, it doesnt even save you from discussions like "I can#t even say X anymore", you got those too, right?
I love getting yelled at with hate speech without knowing if they just want to do free speech or actually wanna kill me, fun times
equality to incite hate against minorities - the best kind of equality /s
that is not really true
that is not a meaningful distinction
if anything those discussions show you how free speech laws work, the majority has pushed off those ideas to a point where bigots feels cornered, left pandering to the "ughhh i HATE how i cant call people the R word AM I RitE??!?!!"
because this is europe and thats not allowed, lmao
When did I equate to owning a gun to being an asshole
to start arguments
what a shock
got please just shut up and leave this is tiring
Next month in texas you can own a gun without any license or training so
what could go wrong
an americans wonder why they have the highest rate of deadly mass shootings
Imagine if they just let people drive without a license or going through training
oh right, I forgot, its the ppl that kill, not the guns
yeah, lmao, need more training to drive a car than use a machine that is literally designed to kill
which is why the rate of murders is exactly equal per capita in every single country
oh wait...
I mean I thought everyone was really for gun safety regardless of political standing
Like people get irrationally mad when they dont follow gun safety
Why would they remove that requirement
Texas trying its hardest to outdo Florida and it shows
i can't wait
no
too much responsibility
I wouldn't mind but I really have no reason to own one
no need for one?
do you own one?
because
1 - there is no reason for someone like me to own a gun
2 - too much responsibility
3 - too dangerous
4 - I'd probably hurt someone
5 - I'd probably hurt myself
6 - no one should own a gun tbh
but even if my mental health had always been spotless i have literally zero reason to own a gun nor do i even think id want to have one for fun
No
no there are valid uses, I am for controlling them
in the US, no
which we do over here
I def would like to own a gun in the future. Not for hunting, or anything, but for protecting myself.
not worth the political capital nor would it be effective in the US
eh, im not sold either way tbh - i do personally support massive amounts of gun control
I'm in favour of banning deadly fire arms. No one should have a gun that fires metal bullets, if police really need something they can use tazers or rubber bullets
from whom?
Anyone trying to hurt me?
do you get ppl that want to hurt you?
If I owned a house I'd own a gun imo
I do, but I don't want a gun
yeah guns are tied to property a lot in the US
goes back to probably the revolution tbh
On the off chance that I do run into someone like that, yeah. I want to be able to protect me and my property.
but as more move to renting, gun ownership is also declining
there was a great video on this sec
but wouldnt something non lethal work as well Jake?
American gun culture is an amazing thing. Most countries with gun cultures trace theirs back to a need for an armed and trained populace in times of war, but as much as Americans may claim theirs to be the same, that is not technically true.
►You can support my channel on Patreon here:
https://www.patreon.com/Kraut_and_Tea
►And you can also s...
there it is
Absolutely not. I want bullets that do maximum damage. To make sure I stop someone
Like why does it have to be a gun, there are enough weapons for self defense that don't kill
That is the best way to stop someone
Why ask the question if you're going to get mad at the response
i don't think people in favor of banning them think police shouldn't have them
No logic there
same issue with a knife or just bare hands really, don't get your argument
Do you remember that police had to shoot the gorilla in that zoo where that baby had climbed into the enclosure?
It’s not the same thing obv, but a bullet can stop someone in their tracks instantly
police had to shoot
oh didn't see that
the gorilla was just chillin
look, we got an authority that is able to use guns no problem then
i thought we all agreed that lmao
Man guru really just tried to invoke an actual conversation just to go attack the first person they disagreed with
Crazy
Disagreement ≠ attack
I think you completely missed the point. I don’t want to have to rely on anyone else, much less the government, for my self defense. Ofc I’d rather they protect me as that’s safer for me, but not at the cost of me not being able to protect myself
Read everything they've said to Aurora since they said they want to ban guns and you tell me if that applies
correction, unarmed police are the best police but still acab
oh god
Okay, let's rephrase what I meant: Police should not carry a gun by default on their uniform. Have one in your car or whatever when you need them for some reason
i lost 500 neurons just by staying in this channel for 3 minutes
“acab”… really?
great then leave
the problem is tasers and rubber bullets aren't effective 100% of the time and they are really slow compared to guns
i am secretly an undercover leftist
I think here are two options, either nobody has guns or everyone has them.
don't think such terms should be used here tbh
and acab is such rhetoric cancer
all cats are beautiful
Since you can't stop people from having guns, potential victims should have some for protection
it means 100 different things and only creates division
acab undermines all actual valid criticism of police
i can't really disagree tbh
That isnt any sort of plausible situation ever
You cant just flip a switch
What is your opinion on drugs then?
Habilitate
sure
legalizing is stupid. decriminalize and give addicts the treatment they need. they are sick, not criminals
You know, I’d me more on board with decriminalizing more drugs, if taxpayers didn’t have to pay a cent to people who used them and didn’t care about fixing their problem. But that’ll never happen
we already spend a fuck ton on imprisoning people with drug stuff
LET ALONE weed-related "crimes"
legalizing drugs is dumb - if there's one thing we don't need it's companies finding out new ways to make people addicted for stuff
decriminalizing drug use would stop a lot of systemic racism. Not a huge percent but probably still a good chunk
The amount of revenue the states and federal government can make off of weed taxes is literally insane
I fail to see how race has anything to do with this
black people are disproportionately represented in weed arrests
Aha
There is a reason there is a rail on bridges. You can say "stupid peaple should fall off lmao"
Just look at for profit prisons
what if with people that want to get help but can't afford it?
ok dude
great insight thank you guru
Ok keep trolling

I can send you my paypal if you want to change that thx
Guru you had some good points earlier, but I guess Adios
The amount of trolls that survive in politics chat is crazy
Troll card exposed
lmfao
welp, had a good run
Ever since brocc quit is politics moderator job this place has changed 
brocc was always the jester 🙄
!ban @shy gulch Trolling, Ableism, In general this server is not a server for political discussion, if you only want to discuss politics please do so somewhere else
:raised_hands: Banned guru#6408 (Trolling, Ableism, In general this server is not a server for political discussion, if you only want to discuss politics please do so somewhere else) [2 total infractions] -- aurora#4484.
what are you talking about kahzi
they said the r word
... that didn't happen but okay
don't talk if you don't know shit :)
that might explain it
Jordan Peterson once said that in order to think, you have to risk being offensive
jodan peterson once forgot to tidy his room
Jordan should stick to philosophy
problem is you can tell if people are being blatantly offensive
he's really good at bringing up problems without giving any solutions
in politics that is
!ban @gilded trench transphobe
:raised_hands: Banned Kahzi#2407 (transphobe) [2 total infractions] -- Joshie#0001.
How is that being transphobic
brick wall gif again
so is it scientifically accurate that a person can neither be male nor female? I really want to understand this because it's a concept that messes with my head. I can understand feeling like you don't belong in your body, but to do away with being either of those? Help me understand this
Yes it is
well, wouldn't they technically be both? I mean.... referring to sex chromosomes, they are one biological sex
no they wouldn't
But you can also have chromosome variations
sex refers to a combination of both your primary (chromosomes, hormones, etc) and secondary sex characteristics (genitals, muscle density, etc) - we have labels for sex (male/female) which are helpful as they cover the "bimodal distribution" of sex
Helpful yes, accurate/complete no
however, many, many people fall outside these distinct peaks - most without even realising it
so you can consider the terms male/female to be "descriptors" of a range of different sexes
But how do you distinguish something from just being abnormal to a totally different sex
okay, please read what i said again
so you would say there are more than just biological male and biological female?
they aren't categories, they are descriptors
XX and XY, anything else is abnormal
which is incorrect btw vector, chromosomes don't solely determine sex
so is a kid with down syndrome abnormal, or just a variation of what we'd call "normal"?
Can you please stop calling people abnormal
you're confusing normal with common - intersex people are uncommon, but they are not abnormal
is abnormal an ableist term? i just want to know what i did wrong exactly
well i suppose it could be yes, but it's more that you're using the wrong term
It's just super insulting
yeah definitely
we have puberty blockers for that
that arent FDA approved and meant for other conditions
A lot of meds are designed for other conditions
it's not responsible - puberty blockers have been demonstrated in countless studies to be the most effective way of treating transgender youths
Don't try to think of it as something you decide, because it isn't
yup
which is why nobody wants kids to immediately transition
But this isn't something you know from one day to the other
what are you talking about
No
The replying to the message directly above your own smh I bet the ping is left on too
it was on haha
two seconds of googling to find that you are wrong
you cannot be given irreversible hormone treatment until you are 18
do you even google shit before saying it
and what source does wikipedia cite for that
What do you see
"trust me bro"
Deciding when a child is old enough to make decisions about their life is hard. The answer is definitely somewhere between 14 and 25 but I don't believe anyone has really nailed it down
I'd probably push it closer to 25
And even if it is, those are very often life saving operations
Why would you post Dutch in an English server bro
(if you're 25 or younger you're a child)
Hormone treatments are reversible
Translate bro we ain't Dutch
You literally get estrogen as a dude when your hair falls out lol
turning 17 soon, still gonna be a child according to amaranth 
iirc brain development doesn't stop until 25
i think the excuse is that you want to be transphobic under a veil of concern trolling but i mean sure lack of sleep works too
Are you on the test discodd client to change the banner?
because it took two seconds of googling for me to find out what you were saying is wrong
it's limited to a certain amount of random ppl and u can't manipulate discord to get it at all
new copypasta nice
Well it was nice playing with you all. PaperMC has lost another supporter due to staff's incompetence. Don't take me the wrong way, you guys have something great going on here. It is just unfortunate that you can't update to 1.17. At the end of the day I am at least glad this happened before I donated the $100 I put aside to support this project. Oh well shit happens and life is not fair, cheers to all of you guys on Minecraft and thanks for the cheese, catch ya later
Let me ask this way, would you rather have suicidal kids or happy kids
!ban @minor badge Ban Evasion
:raised_hands: Banned Super Duper Man#9906 (Ban Evasion) [1 total infraction] -- Joshie#0001.
No
$100 lmao
Ah yes I follow your conversations exclusively to know that you've discussed this before
i've had to explain my profile banner and about me status over 50 times already
yea but u can literally just hover over the beta icon
What and when children are allowed to do anything permanent to their body is an ongoing debate I don't think anyone will ever have a good answer for
it explains itself there
I'm on mobile
You could also be like, not a child about people asking you questions yeah
i mean this channel's literally called politics why not
¯_(ツ)_/¯
israelis have been rlly islamophobic and racist very recently
free palenstine from hamas! no need to be pro-palestine for that
jesus fuck
BRUH
Were all of those replies pings
both sides have problems, the people who force nuance out of this discussion are part of the problem.
people saying israel shouldn't exist, or that there should be a one state solution are also in the wrong
they're doing way more than they need to
iirc israel is giving warnings to civilians
i don't think the goal of israel is to kill even hamas (with the bombing), just destroy cover
People with no bad intentions dont bomb cities
It could be worse, israel could just roll back on in and flatten everything like the US does when oil and weapons of mass destruction are even uttered.
why bomb selected targets when they can stream roll in gaza?
there are valid criticisms with israels response but i feel most of the common ones lack any idea about foreign policy and come off as US support this so it = bad
add in the fact that the enemy is known to use civilians at meatshields.
what do you want, artillery? can be inaccurate and miss intended target
remote missiles? same thing as what you said above.
i mean the drone program ended up killing less civilians/troops
so I would see that the lesser of two evils
that also, because the drone platform can more accurately hit targets
Wakefield MP Imran Ahmad Khan charged with sexually assaulting boy https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-57531904
Uk having a normal one
Last night actually 
I mean, that's the crazy of it all, is that there's a lot of sides of it all, but, then you've got hamas who cower behind civilians
They are the underdogs being oppressed by Israel for years now
Not trying to say their methods are good
underdogs who start lobbing missiles
But for them it feels like the only way to get attention on this issue
Like, fuck israel, but, fuck hamas too
Am just saying that isreal is the only blocking a two state solution
They don't want a solution like that
They want everything
Not really
I mean, sure, but if you've spent decades in an apartheid state getting your homes taken forcibly from you while the international community does nothing about it...
You’re wrong, israel was the one wanting that solution in the first place
yea, so start lobbing missiles at innocent civilians rather than the politicians who do this shit
oh, wait
Looking at their "contract" with Kosovo... No, I don't think so.
Last I checked US and isreal were the only ones voting no last time
And when was that
Isreal obviously wants only them to exist
2013?
I think it was 2013 don't quote me on that
Remember when Israel starter with shoot to maim?
Heh
Make sure to shoot them in the genitals, so we don't get more "Hamas" people.
Yeah, there are countless videos of israelian snipers laughting while maiming/shooting innocent civilians
That's why there are so many protests in isreal, lol
Didn't isreal just change their main religion too? To exclude Arabs?
And there’s videos of gazans welcomeing terrorists who just wiped out an entire family with celebrations
Protesting Israel is very different to anti-semitism
The Itamar attack, also called the Itamar massacre,
was a terrorist attack on an Israeli family in the Israeli settlement of Itamar in the West Bank that took place on 11 March 2011, in which five members of the same family were murdered in their beds. The victims were the father Ehud (Udi) Fogel, the mother Ruth Fogel, and three of their six ch...
Or just someone who just looks out of the ordinary
That actually happened to me once by mistake lol
I didn’t get executed but a few kids were running after me lol, i was on a bike so i just yeeted back
Yeah
To be fair there are a few orthodox jew communities that aren’t very welcoming towards outsiders too
But i guess that was my entire point here in the first place, people present a two sided argument as single sided, which is not how you argue lol
What about Israel not signing BWC?
What’s that?
Biological weapons convention.
To be fair they never really ratified chemical weapons anyway.
So is it nukes or chemical weapons?
All 3 actually.
Those to are rather different
Nukes, chemical and biological.
I have never heard anything about chemical or biological weapons being held here, so I personally highly doubt we have them at all
They most likely do have nuclear weapons though
If you don't have any, why not sign the convention?
I have no idea, i was not the one asked to sign 
Seems like a reasonable thing to sign, especially if we most certainly don’t have them, but something prevented them from doing it, and maybe the reason is known, I don’t know
It's pretty known that they have nukes, since the Jericho missal silo is still maintained.
And you usually don't maintain something like that for no reason.
Do you thing the Palestinian Authority would sign that if they were asked to?
I don’t actually know if they were asked to, were they?
So they didn’t?
Not 100% sure, since if you look at the map, they did? But according to this list they didn't.
So that's a 300 IQ thing. Let's just say they didn't.
Tho:
The Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) currently has 183 states-parties, including Palestine, and four signatories (Egypt, Haiti, Somalia, and Syria).
So I have no idea.
Ok. So they signed it, but didn't rectify it.
Seems kinda vague but fair enough
My MC skin is Obama AND Trump, so I suit both parties 😎
damn bro, represent
OK!
man i got bad news if you think that's gonna happen
good one bro
ah right
so genuine 🥺
too bad he can't compare to the president that came before him, and let's see...
Question: Who’s better than President Tump at “loving the Bible,” “respecting women,” or knowing “the game”?
Answer: Nobody, at least according to Trump.
Subscribe to VICE News here: http://bit.ly/Subscribe-to-VICE-News
Check out VICE News for more: http://vicenews.com
Follow VICE News here:
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/vicenews
Twitte...
isreal sucks
change my mind
how about you provide literally anything to back up your position
because you've said something that could mean a n y t h i n g
you didnt bring anything against me
you didn't make a claim
ok fine nobody is going to reply to you then
come back when you have a specific position
okay how about it shouldn't exist
why
because its basically made up of occupied territories
that dont belong to them
and they are even backed up my the stupid us military
this can be said about any modern country :DD
lol "the stupid us military"
not really
it happened less than 70 years ago
my grandpa is older than israel
so any country established less than 70 years ago shouldn't exist
also where do you want the jewish people to go
its written in their book that they dont have any main country
they are the most prosecuted group in history, and they don't get along with their neighbors well
it's probably a good idea they have a safe space
its like they are wanderers or smth
just in case something happens again
bro its written in their holy book
what the fuck is your point
this isn't about jew
it doesn't have to be a "main country", it can still be the one they go too in times of conflict
israel is literally ethnic cleansing
lmfao

