#politics
1 messages · Page 65 of 1
Keeps the politics out of the general channel, we're a community discord as much as a mc server software one
Meant to respond to this earlier. Got distracted. Anyways, this should be true, but in practice is rarely true. There’s usually only management that gets the good pay for being “experts” whilst the actual hard workers that do the physical aspects of their job tend to suffer. In this case, based on the average for those who do the same job, those employees were underpaid.
I made sure no one that worked for me was underpaid. They went to school for that type of work, so it demanded that type of pay. No one should be getting pay that isn’t equivalent to their schooling, but that’s often not the case.
False, Teddy good
Yeah it's such a simple thing, and it's most likely not even that expensive for you, and studies show that ppl are more happy and work better and more. Ppl like that idea that you care about them.
Tucker Carlson is just a man full of racist dog whistles
i just wanted to say once a military aircraft accidentally dropped a nuclear bomb on a u.s. city and somehow didn't detonate
it's still there in the ground
That’s terrifying
The 1961 Goldsboro B-52 crash was an accident that occurred near Goldsboro, North Carolina, on 23 January 1961. A Boeing B-52 Stratofortress carrying two 3–4-megaton Mark 39 nuclear bombs broke up in mid-air, dropping its nuclear payload in the process. The pilot in command, Walter Scott Tulloch, ordered the crew to eject at 9,000 feet (2,700 m)...
Less that it happened and more that it just got left there
Goldsboro, North Carolina
I’m honestly surprised America hasn’t blown itself up five times over
isn't that the place bill gates eats at
and nobody sane makes the argument that big companies would need to increase their prices
its literally the opposite
bigger companies can absorb that cost better than small business
economics of a minimum wage will depend on location primarily
Their website doesn't even have a list of locations or say what city they're in
That's how small/local they are
Well I left my spare universe in my other pants so we can't do a test run
All we have are projections and anecdotal evidence
we were talking about this the other day in here, there is projections on this stuff
Why would location matter when comparing their prices to their pay/benefits?
If anything being in the Seattle area would make things worse for them and make that harder to pull off
Most of the people in the US live in one of the biggest cities in the US, that's how it works
Ok, so technically you could have some weird agrarian society where that isn't true but you know what I mean 😛
yeah i got ya
idk I still think social services are a much better use of political capital than a clear cut federal minimum wage change
Depending on what/how you're measuring 60-80% of the US population lives in cities like that
what i think could be cool is a congress "suggested" minimum wage thats tied to aid (be it highway or otherwise)
and that's something actually passable by the dems since its tax policy
Pretty sure the Supreme Court ruled they can't tie federal aid to unrelated things
It was one of the ACA lawsuits
They could do it with drinking age and speed limits because those apply to driving but you couldn't just add random things on there
I don't think Texas, et al has been heard yet?
Don't know if I wrote that the right way either 😛
Apparently at the Supreme Court the case is called California v Texas
winner gets LA!
I don't get why this is a big legal fight to begin with
Texas says because the "tax" for the mandate is now zero it's unenforceable so the entire law should be wiped out
Congress seems to have made their intentions clear on the rest of the law by not getting rid of it when they made that tax change
This isn't the first case where the Supreme Court has decided even if Congress didn't make it explicit they could split a law up and only drop part of it
Just last term, the issue of severability came before the court on two occasions: in Seila Law v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants. In both cases, Thomas and Gorsuch questioned the “propriety of modern severability doctrine.” And in both cases — with the fate of the ACA looming on the horizon — the other seven justices affirmed the court’s “settled” severability doctrine, applying the “strong presumption” of severability to excise the unconstitutional provision of two separate laws while leaving the remainder intact. As Chief Justice John Roberts put it in his opinion for the court in Seila Law, “unless there is strong evidence that Congress intended otherwise,” the doctrine operates as “a scalpel rather than a bulldozer.”
Also a note that McDonalds is not a good comparison to owned and operated businesses, most of the fast food franchises are not. The franchisee pays a membership, and is railroaded into buying only from approved suppliers. They're also price locked. Hence why I don't think buying a franchise especially in this area is a good business decision. Forcing them to pay more in wages would have completely different effects to forcing an owned and operated business.
I still dont understand the mandate, considering when someone goes in without insurance, said person gets fucked by the system in event of an emergency.
This didn’t go well with Medicaid expansion...
It’s a way to force people to get healthcare. “Here we made it easier, but we are also going to heavily nudge you in that direction to keep everything cheaper”
It goes beyond that
We would also need to wipe the slate clean for 90% of the house and senate
I mean yes, however the mandate can be cheaper to take the hit than getting insurance.
And honestly, before any of that, there needs to be a massive increase in education of the public on issues of policy.
It can, which is why it is essentially a suggestion.
If the cost differential is a couple hundred, why not just get the health coverage?
But I don't think you should be mandated or fined to not buy into a product
For the time it was implemented, it was the best we were getting.
If you’ve got the votes for that, you’ve got the votes for universal healthcare, so just stop pussy footing around and go big. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Also hospitals shouldn't charge out stupid amounts of cash and for fuck sake we live in the digital age, that God damn bill should have been tabulated right as it hits the insurance company network
Or have an overhead of thousands of percentage points...
Most of the good universal healthcare systems are moreso just connectors than complete national overhead
As a Canadian, I never had a problem with health care until I moved to the Us
Then I avoided it like the plague
I think healthcare is one of the places you’re not going to find that as much
People go to different countries all the time for specialists or experimental treatment. Not just those with privatized healthcare
I’ve never really heard of a Canadian having an issue with the healthcare.
I’ve had more issues here then there
There, I break an ankle and go to whatever hospital is closest, get things done and over with.
Here, I need to make sure if this is an emergency, find the “right hospital”, and then get the same treatment
Rules which can be rolled back with the flip of a switch? Or do you mean law, which is likely to never pass?
Honestly, the reset button just needs to be pressed, and hard. Lol
joe biden
Can we not?
Is that all you joined for?
This channel is dedicated to actual discussions
If you do want to engaging in such discussions, please do
I don't know if you can really solve America's problems with a change in government system, because the underlying issue is far more complex than that. People freely believe their "side" is the correct side, tribal ties and confirmation bias, etc. To me you've had politicians doing pretty much the same things for quite a while, and just making it sound different.
That being said, many nations are like that.
That's pretty much what I meant.
oof
I suppose he had a reason for it but Biden seems to have decided not to follow the whole "unified front to the world" bit where when overseas you don't talk domestic politics
I’m not responding to what I was tagged in, thanks.
I think they only didn't get banned because they left, best to just pretend it never happened
jesus christ
hf the fact that all you have is images from instagram to explain your positions
should tell you something
Oh I didn't even bother to talk to them
It's just shows that some ppl are really detached
I’m all for debating politics or whatever, but that was quite depressing.
so question for you
I'm just curious
who did you support in either president race or primaries
who would you support in that case
man
I suggest learn more about politics in that case
You will NOT get your student debt forgiveness
his policy was never to remove it all
You will NOT get your minimum wage increased
it's electorally unpopular
You WILL pay 5 times more for basic medication like insulin
he is for Medicare reform and this isn't even something tried to reform yet
You will NOT get a 2k stimulus
this was never a policy position made by any dem worth their weight
You WILL embrace the upcomming middle east wars
learn foreign policy
Children WILL still be locked into the cages that i built 8 years ago
if you think this would be ANY BETTER UNDER FUCKING TRUMP you have NO IDEA what you're talking about
You WILL get into your wage cage and pay off your debts
omega cringe
Yes, me, wanting a “safe space”.
No, actually, I have no time to respond, since any meaningful conversation will be completely disregarded.
the $2000 was $1600 + $400 in jan/feburary
you're just braindead
I'm sorry you're terminally online
i hope they find a cure

Biden wars:
Kosovo
I’m old enough to have lived through 11 different presidents. I may not agree with the positions held here, but I certainly do not use memes or ridiculously inaccurate sources to field my views.
That should go to Trump by brother.
No way this guy isnt trolling
Biden isn't perfect so lets toss a grenade in
your foreign policy stance is war = bad
Also you're "I'm not American" is so obviously fake
Two decades
Saying trump hasnt dealt with war is tinfoil
War is no longer just a physical space between people. Troops don’t have to be deployed to be at war. If you want to be a bit more specific on your definition of war, for clarity sake, please do.
man
Wait we cant ask him we are trying to stifle his freedom of speech
From the prospective of Kosovo and Serbia that is a war on their religion.
When was this account made
You didn't read what they had to sign.
krusic you can't be specific
you have to speak in broad terms
its all they understand
Idk what kind of brain mush your media hypnotized you into thinking but imagine any us president that wasnt a war monger lul thinking trump is pure
This is ignorance on mass scales, my man.
Depends on your definition of war.
^ What he said
Imagine thinking declaring a war is different from still actively fighting in the war absolves you of being accountable for the war
bUt hE DiDNt StARt iT
Didnt mean he didnt bomb the shit out of countries still
Who strawman now
I disagree. Just like that image disagrees.
I wonder if this is one of those 30% who think Trump is going to be reinstated in August
lmfao
I mean, you're on his dick pretty hard so I wouldn't be surprised
And I named two and you ignored both. 
technically the US hasn't been in a war since the 50s
Strawman defending his argument after it was proven false
Biden wasn't in office 70 years ago
Grasp at that started
The US hasn't been at war since the Korean War 😛
So if you're going to expand your definition it seems logical to expand it to cover any overseas military action
Post a facebook picture again so we can understand what straw ur grasping at
Biden didn't vote in favor of any wars because the US hasn't declared war in 70 years
Also of course Trump hasn't voted for any military actions, dude was never in Congress
Doesn't mean he didn't do them anyway
The US hasn't voted to start a war in 70 years
I guess you aren't American after all, this is basic civics
Then again being American doesn't mean you'd know that, sadly...
It’s undeclared
You've basically set up a definition that makes it impossible for Trump to have done anything wrong
Thus my statement about being on his dick
How could Trump have possibly voted for any of those? The President doesn't vote for things and Trump was never anything else
so lets say we take your definition, why didn't trump stop any of these "wars"
There is no vote
I'll never defend our actions in Iraq, the rest are... fuzzy
Bruh no one is defending the war
I was out there protesting that shit in 2004, when you were learning to read
You got some extremely jaded view bro
And somehow you are morally superior?
Saying Biden is better than Trump doesn't say we support those things
That's childish thinking
I was arguing about your definitions
You are no longer interesting to talk to, this is going in circles
why didn't trump stop any of these "wars"
We out here arguing trump is also a war monger and this dude trying to flip the conversation into us saying we wanted war LOL
That were murderes
?kick @shrewd canopy Come back with some manners and good faith if you wish to retain access to this channel.
:raised_hands: Kicked hf#3143 (Come back with some manners and good faith if you wish to retain access to this channel.) [1 total infraction] -- Proximyst#6900.
Ah
Everytime someone would counter his argument he started shifting it to something else and would circle back later
Literally trying to manipulate the convo lmao
On a somewhat related note, talking about the Kosovo War in here always feels awkward
He shifted goalposts numerous times.
But only to compliment his side of whatever his argument was to begin with.
Went from talking about trump vs. Biden wars and trump not being a warmonger cuz he didnt "vote" or "start" to calling us murdering sympathizers
I don’t support either of them, but a lot of what he said about both was just incredibly misleading or misinformation.
They gotta wait the 10 minutes before they start spewing again dont they
The conversation started with whether trump started or voted for wars
Then you shifted towards this sentiment now after you were argued with
And are now calling us war sympathizers
No wars are bad killing people is bad
Lock the convo into your narrative
Feels like you disagree
Whst comparison
Did you forget already
The comparison
Trump war monger bad
I think the conversation started with white pride or something but this is all one big blur of awful takes so maybe?
The conversation when I joined was you trying to say trump wasnt a war monger
No it was further back
One of the other tumblr images
Trump "bombed the shit out of" ISIS and helped the Saudis do the same to Yemen so this is a weird take
Biden has been around longer so he has been involved with more of this but by your definition it's impossible for Trump to have done anything wrong
No man this guy is 100% a troll LMAO
I disagree with your point so I don't see how that'll happen
You're just setting up definitions to let you say Trump is better
And trying to get us to go along with it
HF what is your goal here? What’s your point?
I hope to read a spigot post one day about how papermc fosters the new resistance and war mongering america
Turns out the answer is "it's complicated"
What was the first statement
I don't think I defended his decisions...
Yes
Yes
Yes
Whether any of those are good or bad is a complicated thing
In retrospect Vietnam was pretty obviously bad, Iraq is obviously bad from the start, the rest are fuzzy or I disagree
@shrewd canopy
This is me not agreeing with either of them
The others explained those other points. I was merely agreeing with them.
But keep pushing ur narrative that we want to kill people
Not being american I also assume your being fed some really tasty horseshit
Kosovo and Afghanistan I think we made the right call on (although how Afghanistan ended up is not great), Syria we only got involved in because all the Baathists were pushed out of Iraq by Bush and started ISIS, Libya was supposed to be us enforcing a ceasefire but was probably a bad call
I don’t believe he’s not American. This is exactly what an American would say
This channel was a mistake.
He talks like someone who watches OANN and/or Newsmax all day but also has a poor grasp of US civics and randomly flavors words with extra 'u's
It’s nice when there’s genuine conversation. This, however, is not
I think not banning this troll instead of kicking was a mistake
Sorry for the tag, I forget replying does that.
They have some permanent bias already and are just looking to pick fights with people by spewing 30 different takes
Sorry, what exactly is the discussion/argument about? What is the goal of it, why is it here?
ISIS came from the Baathists from Iraq, this is a pretty well known thing outside of conspiracy theory circles
Some weapons provided to Syrian forces during their civil war might have ended up going to them but we tried to prevent that and never knowingly gave them anything
Their structure, training, etc though all came from Iraqi military vets
Who here is defending Biden?
Bruh the argument started by you posting a picture saying trump didnt deal in wars which is literally false
Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant
Then you went into this tangent that were defending war
When literally atleast what I was saying is trump is ALSO a war monger
Never defended biden
I wouldn’t call him a war monger, but I will say he also didn’t oppose the already ongoing conflicts.
I still don't quite see the point. I am fairly certain nobody here would support war for war's sake. If Biden did, in my lack of looking up any sources at all, vote to enter war with another entity, that is indisputable and everyone knows as much. Why is this discussed at all?
The Syrian civil war allowed them to act more openly, this is true
He literally did the same thing every president has done in the past 2 decades
Bomb countries and meddle in foreign affairs
True
Not disputing that
Every person in power is doing the same things to stay in power, that's not really news, and this discussion is tiring and honestly I'd suggest all of you to stop and calm down
Did Obama's actions allow them to take over the country and be a problem? Probably. Did we know that was going to happen ahead of time? No. Without knowing that, was supporting the civil war against Assad a good idea? ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Why is American politics always so exhausting
it's gonna blow hf's mind when they figure out that more than one person can be bad
Because everyone thinks they're right
Because we aren't 5 or Libertarians so understand that things aren't so black and white
Yes, I am certain Americans who voted for Biden would much rather be at war with Afghanistan than be under Trump for whichever reason is most important to them. You don't need to support war to disagree too intensely with the opposing politician to vote for the one who supported several wars.
I won't say that because I disagree
biden is a war monger and all the wars he voted for were bad
Post link to where anyone said biden wasnt a war monger
I just said that 😛
Amaranth is a war monger
Why do people join this discord to discuss politics
And a hot tubber
Rubber Duck?
I don't know his reasoning for voting for any of that (and a lot of it only got voted for after the fact, President did something and Congress was like "whelp, better provide funding for that")
But some of those either made sense to do or were complicated enough you can't say for sure until after the fact
who is this "you" you keep referring to
It's easier to vote for someone that wages war far away than for someone that makes your life right now miserable
i havent seen anyone say the things you're saying
She’s right. I’m too old for this.
I was playing with definitions as a way to point out your definitions made it impossible for Trump to have done anything wrong
Could this finally stop now
Amaranth is our elective representative for all americans on foreign policy
I read this late
Eww, he called me a liberal

Honestly I'm surprised they weren't booted after this one
If you don't spread conspiracy theories
always a shit fest
you're talking to the wrong people if it's a shit fest
Oh look they're going for the conspiracy theories

Fuck Notch
If notch ever tried to join here he'd be banned immediately
Well, unless he just didn't say anything 😛
Transphobic antisemitic Nazis are not welcome here
I guess to get away with trolling you just have to troll in the right channel
What did I miss on Notch? I’m not hip with all that
Multiple people would ban him instantly lol
Oh nvm
This guy is so American it hurts
Spoon fed tinfoil for breakfast
Well, You’re the most American non-American I’ve ever seen
If you weren't from the US you'd call it the BioNTech vaccine and know Trump had nothing to do with it
Biontech is a pretty cool company
Everyone here calls it Biontech, no one says pfizer
No
Getting to the point of Emergency Use Authorization in the US for the vaccine you might be able to give him some credit for but other countries did that before the US so we weren't very warp speed there 😛
Never heard someone in Germany call it Pfizer
The companies involved didn't get any government funding or anything for this vaccine though
You could argue mRNA tech got government funding since I think that came from university researchers in the 90s but yeah
Over here in Sweden, it's always written Pfizer/BioNTech or simply Pfizer ^^
Yeah in the UK it's Pfizer-BioNTech
they weren't bad at ordering, they were bad at distributing
and also a lot of countries had problems with uptake
The media writes Biontech pfizer but when people talk about it they say Biontech usually. The third article even does that
Because the EU is not a country
bc they suck at a lot of things? idk what you want me to say here
It's like asking why the Commonwealth is so bad at distribution
Yes exactly, those where the exact thoughts i had while writing that sentence /s
Wtf.. do you have like a template you follow when you ask questions during discussions
Trolling with structure
I dig it
different countries have different postal systems how's that hard
Oh fuck off
If you're only here to annoy people then leave
This is not a discord to discuss politics and this channel only exists to keep the stuff out of the other channels
!ban @shrewd canopy Annoying politics troll
:raised_hands: Banned hf#3143 (Annoying politics troll) [2 total infractions] -- aurora#4484.

this entire debacle was so funny to read ngl
Only took 2 hours
nice - will post this anyway as it's an answer to the "why are the eu bad at vaccine rollout" https://ec.europa.eu/info/live-work-travel-eu/coronavirus-response/public-health/eu-vaccines-strategy_en
Inb4 i got banned for talking about my opinions muuu free speech
I feel like that's all that was
the answer being, they aren't really responsible and it's considerably more complex
Was some weird bigger agenda to flame papermc
Itll be on spigotmc by tomorrow
Or yatopia 
The answer to all of their questions was "it's complicated"
I refuse to call it phizer
They were boiling complex topics down to strawmen and buzzwords and refusing to accept anything but a yes/no answer
don't worry, I can also ban people on Yatopia
I have the power of god and anime on my side
heeeelll yea
Being 55, it’s incredibly difficult to not get into political arguments with younger folks. Especially, in this sort of situation. I’m more patient than I used to be, though
What a morning, though
dude spouted bullshit without actually listening
that's basically rule 1
listen to the other side
I see it a lot. Common in the US. Wish I knew exactly why. I have ideas, of course
There was no debate it was them coming in with a preset opinion on all the things they wanted to talk about and looking to pick fights, like that type of person saves a text document on their desktop with links to all their arguments
lmao
i just have a folder of funny screenshots from this discord
anyway i'll be gone from here until the next idiot comes in here to go off on a tangent with all edge and no point 👀
I kind of asked earlier and apologies for not knowing, what did Notch do that’s warranting a ban if the guy joined? Is it that bad?
Basically: he said some degenerate stuff
Ah okay, so just not thinking about anything he said, and not being level headed really
well, it's clear a lot of what he said has had thought into it (due to it being said multiple times, with confirmations, etc)
The biggest reason GOP members vote down Jan 6 investigation is they were probably complicit themselves
He still has conflict with the Yogscast as well, even though that was in 2011
Alright. Thanks for the answers. I should clarify, not well thought out, then.
It sucks, social media is dividing people more thanks to algorithms. People are even less tolerant to the other side
There was a good vid a watched about notch recently that I agreed with
It's no secret that Minecraft creator Markus Notch Persson has become a controversial figure, but is there more to the story than you've heard?
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/OfficialSlushTV
Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/SlushTV_
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/SlushTV_
well yeah, the algorithms are there to feed people content they like/agree with to keep them on the platform
depends on the platform but yes, that as well
Facebook seems to be designed to create flamewars specifically because that keeps you there
i go on facebook and read the comment sections of local news articles
i get shocked when i read the stupidity written there, and the amount of people voting up
In general flamewars end up on the top of your feed or in the trending section due to all the interactions though so even if they meant them to show you things you like they fail at that 😛
every time there is an article about covid the comment section is bombarded by anti vacciners
i dont know where the hell they all come from. do they exist in real life too?
are they real people? everyone i meet in real life are taking it seriously
yes, mostly on facebook/twitter
i hope they're just a very loud minority
yep
It's a dangerous precedent if you let a small number of loud people on the internet dictate how we should live our lives
My mom's side of the family seems to be pretty firmly anti-vax
Or at least against this one
most antivaxxers here just get clowned/laughed at
the argument is always "only 0.01% of people under 60 die from covid, and most of them had existing conditions" yeah but WHAT ABOUT THEM
are we supposed to not give a shit about 60+ people?
My mom is just weird about it, her sisters are all in on the 5g bill gates stuff, her brothers I'm not sure on reasons but don't want it, my grandma says she believes the 5g stuff but got it anyway, my grandpa signed up as soon as he could and was happy to get it
also if you die with covid then you die from covid
it's kinda sad how easy it is to get spoonfed conspiracy theories nowadays
One aunt had a trip to Finland cancelled because of covid last year and hopes to go instead next year so will probably get it then
If you already have cancer or another illness, and you've so far managed to survive fine, then Covid comes and you die. It was Covid that killed you
She says she doesn't want it and hopes they don't require it but she'll get it if she doesn't have a choice, she wants that trip really bad
You can't just blame it on the other thing and say it wasn't covid related
anything that covid has contributed to being the cause of death, makes it a covid death
Shh, that's too complicated
that is partially true
Only one thing kills you, you can't die from multiple causes
Technically true but not useful
if you have cancer and you're still alive, then covid comes and you die, you died from covid
it's like getting a kill assist in a video game
If you have cancer and are still alive then get covid and die it doesn't mean covid was definitely a cause, it can be hard to say sometimes
yeah but you should definitely avoid covid
In general though if you're fighting off one disease and then another weakens you and you die you can blame both for it
if you have a respiratory condition, yes
and the fact that some people are saying it "wasn't a covid death" is ridiculous
exactly, you blame both
Even if you got covid and then recovered the damage/weakness from it could still be the reason why something else managed to kill you off
So yeah, it's complicated
i just want pandemic to be over so i can go outside and enjoy the sweet 5g internet
you dont need to go outside for that though
Like its so frustrating the people who spread fake news without even doing their research
i'll stand directly beneath the cell tower
just get a wifi router that supports it 
Many people cannot process scary concepts like death and such complicated things as "there can be multiple factors in a death" and find the laziest answer that makes them happy. That is, the first answer that they find that meets their desired goal of "everything is fine"
back to memento mori anyone?
I am honestly surprised to see a politics channel in this server lol
lol this reminds me of those death touch martial artists. If you get punched 30 years before you die, it was the death touch that ultimately killed you, and yes, it took 30 years to kill you
@near glen Hmmmm, good video. It makes me wonder about Notch's tweets that appear racist. I feel like if you put them in context with all his other weird tweets then it just looks like him being a simple jokester who isn't really serious about what he says
which seems to be what most of his tweets nowadays are
yeep
so that's how I view these tweets of his, a man just having fun and not at all serious about what he says
poor guy though, I think his experience at Mojang and at center stage from the community have kinda broke him
posting hateful content aimed against minority groups with the sole purpose of spreading and inciting hate? we must have different definitions of fun
are you putting those tweets as exclusive content from him? or putting them in context to his other tweets?
when someone sees a tweet, do you think that they sit down and decide to trawl through the other tweets from said account in order to create a general understanding of the vibe and personality of the creator such that they can obtain a contextual understanding of the tweets? obviously not - so if he didn't mean them then he shouldn't have posted them
and besides, doesn't make them any less bigoted/transphobic/etc
i mean that's exactly how atheists get the wrong impression of God
so if you think that is completely ok then you're missing the point
what's god's twitter?
i don't think that exists
i'm sorry if you feel that those tweets are yet more content that are offensive
I don't feel that, they pretty objectively are offensive - they were written to create offense regardless of the context or what the weather was like when they were posted
so regardless of the intention of the author
well in real life we can't know the intention of a piece of media so we have to take educated guesses
do you think that if notch was not intending to be, using one of his tweets as an example, transphobic that he would have realised that his post was being misinterpreted and attempted to remedy this misunderstanding?
hard to say; I think his general frustration with interacting with people may hinder those thoughts of keeping it friendly towards others but I think he generally does not mean any ill will towards others
I think it's clear he doesn't have good positions on trans and (maybe) race issues
but I don't think he's bigoted in general
so it appears if the right person talked to him, he could be talked the other way
hi! im liberal
if a trans person wants to enter the bathroom of their gender identity and not biological sex, and that person is only identifying as trans due to a traumatic experience early on in their life (thus, their identity is a way to cope), then I have an obvious problem with that, and wondering what you guys think of that too
Does it matter which bathroom someone takes?
no
Nope!
well, why do you think bathrooms are segregated between male and female?
many places just do unisex here
and i suppose that's fine, but would you want the bathroom to be used by both male and female at the same time? just coming and going at will?
i personally would not
I'm trying to find a charitable way to describe your general statement above, but I keep running into the idea that you're suggesting some trans people aren't validly trans. Can you clarify what you're saying?
why would I care who is with me in the bathroom
I would want privacy from any other person, no matter the gender
I suppose some people might find it uncomfortable using those open standing toilets when others also are there, but for closed stalls I don't see the issue.
yes mbaxter, that's what i'm saying
i can provide you with source material if you want
who are you to decide who is "valid" trans or not, wtf
i'm not, i'm merely explaining others have felt that way about their own experiences
there are more trans/intersex people than there are ginger people - you have almost certainly shared a bathroom with someone who wasn't of the same sex as you before, probably many times
so what you're describing literally is just a non-issue
Ginger people are a minority confirmed??? GLM???
lol
@near glen i don't decide that, of course not
After what he described as a "misdiagnosis"[6] of gender dysphoria, Walt Heyer underwent gender reassignment surgery and lived for eight years as a woman named Laura Jensen,[7] before regretting and reversing his sex change.
source: someone who regretted their decision
yes, people regret and decide to de-transition - this is a thing that happens
i'd classify this as anecdotal evidence
so someone's story isn't evidence to you?
i mean, his story was that his grandma wanted a girl so much and gave him a dress early on in his life and that moment scarred him later on in his life
so yes
whether someone is valid (can be determined scientifically) as falling under the LGBT spectrum
and this is exactly why trans healthcare sucks ^
yeah, i wish it was simple but it's not
yeah exactly, better investment into trans healthcare would not only help more trans people but also help people like your example who were misdiagnosed
what is your view of giving children the right to take HRT?
do you think they know who they are at that age?
well im not a doctor, but if the science says it's okay then i would agree with that - however, if i recall correctly no children are given HRT - or if they are, it's not with the recommendation of any scientific organisation
i feel like young children (up to 12) are still experimenting. the real "finding who you are" part comes around puberty/early adulthood
The problem I see is that health insurance companies and pharma would love to have people on their products and drugs for life, similar to insulin.
When it comes to exploiting animals, @elonmusk is a true leader.
@SpaceX is now sending baby squids and “water bears,” into space, where they’ll be experimented on.
Be a real pioneer, Elon—launch yourself into space and leave animals alone! https://t.co/CEaJ3bJWKi
104
268
Oh PETA, never change
Water bears… those are microscopic creatures.
I think PETA should come out and defend viruses
PETA needs to come out as anti vaccines cause they are basically genocide for living things
i still wonder how people are still able to take PETA seriously
PETA have honestly single-handedly done more damage to veganism/animal-rights activism than any poacher/hunter/omnivore group/organisation/individual
Yeah that’s probably true
The whole “can’t say kill two birds with one stone” or “bring home the bacon” or whatever thing they did just makes people laugh at you.
No ones going out and killing birds with stones when they hear that
!ban @shy gulch you aren't valid
:raised_hands: Banned theSomeoneMan#4310 (you aren't valid) [1 total infraction] -- MiniDigger#3086.
fair enough
@pure jetty gotta love this reply https://twitter.com/JoeHarper/status/1404848544717094914
@peta @elonmusk @SpaceX HOW MANY MICROBES DID YOU SQUISH TYPING THIS ON YOUR PHONE SCREEN!
Literally MILLIONS of bacteria left dead and dying!
?
Additionally a vast majority of animals "rescued" by PETA are put down.
Not to mention the time they took a dog off the porch when it wouldn't come to them and put it down the same day
They're a toxic af organisation which would sooner murder all animals than live along side people or be on farms and such
animals like dogs have lived along side humans for fucking centuries
11k years
what the heck
https://www.businessinsider.com/amazon-warehouse-turnover-worker-shortage-2021-6
The solution is to not treat your workers like fucking robots.
fucking timed bathroom breaks
unbelievable
no wonder why the workers have been trying to unionize
I'm sure a lot of people will accept waiting an extra day and pay a little more in shipping costs if the workers weren't exploited like hell
i wonder how much they must be spending on recruitment and onboarding
@brisk cradle do not forget the exploitative as hell practices on sellers. Sure, its easy to sell on amazon and they can store your stuff, but there were some reports about sellers not able to sell at a lower price directly compared to amazon
It's a shame this will never pass https://www.newsweek.com/democrats-unveil-bill-decriminalize-drug-possession-federal-level-expunge-records-1600839
I actually think thats not a bad law, ill have to read the full context, but I think decriminalize for possessing drugs is a good step forward. Does it keep in place laws against selling it?
yeah, this is actually not bad, and would be nice to after having inmates leave the prison system, move the funds over to promoting recovery and rehab
It's a pretty thorough bill, deals with all the people who have been busted in the past
But it'll probably never even get through the House
Sliding backwards
Oof
The job itself its being a robot. You can have the best enviorment to work but the issue will be out there.
Also be aware, that is mostly a non-skill job, anyone can do it without any knowledge.
Thats why lot of people join and quit
plenty of "non-skill" jobs do not have a turnaround this dramatic
That is so stupid, that only further teaches kids to discriminate against other people, Learning about lgbtq at a young age (in my opinion ) would be more beneficial and promote acceptance
The bill outlaws LGBT people from featuring in educational material or TV shows for the under-18s. It means that films featuring gay character or seen as promoting homosexuality could only be shown at night with an 18-plus certificate.
Movies that could be affected include Bridget Jones's Diary, the Harry Potter films and Billy Elliot, broadcaster RTL Klub Hungary said.
EU parliment is sueing EU commission over not acting on Hungary I think
So that's fun
Poland isn't much better
This is what happens when extreme conservative ppl take over and aren't hold accountable
Suddenly you loose your freedom of sexual self determination and similar freedoms
This entire bill is stupid of course, but banning Harry Potter lmao. I'm guessing it's about Dumbledore being gay, but that isn't even mentioned in the movies.
or anywhere except J. K. Rowling's twitter
I dunno, the last book hints at it pretty strongly
I haven't read the article but having a higher rating on movies/shows that focus more on sex doesn't seem to be too unreasonable
Just depends on how strong the article is
Banning Harry Potter for all minors makes no sense ofc as it doesn't focus on sex
You aren't allowed to have LGBT characters in shows for children
Doesn't matter how sexual the show is
Couldn't even have them go to a school dance or something together
Amogus supremacy
That's a big shitshow.
i dont see why not, especially since some parents dont want their children seeing these actions.
idrc what you do with ur life, but we dont have to push this "peer pressure" on children
Media, in all of its forms, has immense power to shape ideas. Television, films and digital media can influence how we see others, and how we see ourselves. Accurate, authentic representation can break down barriers, open us to new ideas, create powerful role models, and even be a source of…
This is because this specific job you have to be constantly packing... This is why might be over-killing and lot of people quit
that has nothing to do with what i said
plenty of packing jobs don't have such high turnaround
Keep dum memes out of here please
It's not peer pressure to show characters representing real people who exist in this world.
which is fine, Amazon is getting its just desserts.
The Hungary law looks like it's intended as a distraction to me. I'm pretty sure they will cave on it relatively quickly.
yes but people constantly keep praising the lgbtq community for litterally no reason, so it can act to children as some sort of pressure
then don't show it to your children
read above
m
that's not what i said
if you are so bigoted that you don't want your children to view lgbt content, don't show it to them
^^^^
Remember growing up being unsure of who you where and what your identity was?
Like, I bet we've all fucking been there questioning our identity especially through shit like puberty
wdym
or did "girly" shit like having a tea party
Or did "manly" shit like fighting and all that crap
When we where younger, it was a thing, called puberty
Yes, some people ended up having issues deeper and ended up seeking treatment and shit for stuff leading to trans people etc
all i remember from my childhood is going to the beach in syria, also i agree
But these days, you say that you're unsure about your identity and you have 200 people tryna throw a label on you
and, I get it, I have nothing against trans people, I have nothing against the gays or the theys or whatever
So long as you don't harm me, do what you gotta do
But, we've gone to the point where a little child wanting to dress up like a princess potentially throws a label on them which falls into medical intervention
no offense cat it really seems like you don't know what you're talking about
an intervention which people are alarmingly and increasingly saying that was pushed upon them waaaay too fast and now they've done irreversible harm to themselves
or maybe u are just saying that because you dont agree with what you are saying
and, yea, that issue as a whole is probably more widely represented than it actually is
i do agree with what i am saying
But I think that as a society we're preventing kids from being kids
i meant what cat is saying* its 1 am
I mean, my brains like, semi gone
modern society is weird
But, I think that the modern stance of tryna push all this crap on people at a young age is stupid, but, I think those tryna prevent even the sembelence of it is also fucking moronic
like genuinely i would suggest either actually reading into the topic or just not talking about it so authoritatively like this
why does 72 genders exist
stuff like "it's probably more widely represented than it is" and "we're preventing kids from being kids" and "pushing crap on kids at a young age" is just so easily demonstrably false if you just spend any amount of time reading studies or the opinions/guidance of medical institutions like the who/nhs/ehc/etc
im not sure if this video is against the rules (just some guy speaking out against smth) so can someone review it in dms before i post here
if you're not sure don't post it lmao
mm
"more widely represented than it is" - i mean the people who regret going down that avenue
But, there are people who work in these places who've been raising red flags about this stuff
are there?
There are people who've regreted it who've stated that there was very little questioning put into place to determine how they actually felt about stuff
i do not like pronouns
yet you use them everyday
i do not like pronouns
correct
got some bad news for you there bud
i do not like them
how
my brain hurts and my inclination to run around tryna find it, but, there was a documentary recently which interviewed people on both sides of the fence, people who've been there and are happy, people who've been there and regerted it
you just used two right there libya
"i" is not a pronoun? it is something indicating to me
I mean, the whole pronoun argument is dumb
why would someone want to be refered to as an item (it)
On one side, I know that if I present male, I know that societly, imma be referred to as a male, and yea, I know some people aren't all too happy with that but unless we learn to make a language which is naturally gendered to all heck to not be as gendered, I can't see there being a massive "fix" on that
but, if somebody asks me, can you use she/her, they/them, I mean, am not perfect, but, out of the decency of literal basic respect, I will aim to use them
ive never had anyone ask me to use a pronoun to refer to them before (probably since i live in a country that is not a great fan of europe or western countries)
that's fair
i mean just because you've not encountered something doesn't mean it doesn't exist
I think a lot of stuff can really boil down to be "don't be a cunt"
You're not god
It's not your job to judge anybody
if you disagree with their lifestyle choice, does it harm you? no? move the fuck on.
i dont have a problem with lgbtq community but if someone just keeps boasting or annoying me about it then ill crack down on them
ill crack down on them
why does it bother you so much... what do you even mean by this
I just think that there are a lot of concerns especially in ties to education that concerns me
I think that banning representation of those people in content is fucking stupid
condemn them
okay edgelord lmao
?
you should tell em to stop being annoying about it in a normal and reasonable manner instead
why you gotta act so dramatic "i condemn thee!"
They should 100% have representation, but, I mean, sex education in general is something that should be left to early teens, but, I think that theres many issues that we gotta address as a society
basic respect towards one another is defo something we critically need
there's a lot of evidence that early sex education is better in terms of sexual literacy, health, understanding, etc
Fuck you
Fuck you too buddy
english is not my first language so i just use what i was taught
i was taught surname instead of last name for instance
both are correct?
time and time again it's been shown that not teaching people about things leads to bad stuff
I mean, surname is the correct name
last name is just a "people are dumb and don't remember what surnames are"
No it's British, not english
yes but its a more formal. version
I mean, for me, the issue is tryna draw the lines of where it all needs to stand
Your'e not teaching 6 year olds the karma sutra, are you?
and teaching people bad things can also lead to bad stuff
does it?
but, I mean, some awareness of individuality should be taught, and we gotta find a way to teach and understand diversity
bc that's not what the literature shows libya
let me give you a scenario
well yeah, but that's just an overly extreme example - we're talking about teaching people the basics not how to play fun
if someone is actively promoting terrorism and teaching others about it
I mean, I'm bi, I was raised by a father who was overtly homophobic, and it really fucked me up on actually like, wanting to learn more on stuff
they will think that terrorism is good when the brainwashing finishes
*thats just a scenario
how does someone actively promoting terrorism compare to me being taught that gay people exist lmfao
ive clearly stated it was a scenario twice, no?
I mean, I was being overly extreme intentionally, I mean, we all don't know what's going on in schools and what's being taught, I'm just concerned with the social implications of "easy answers" for identity as a whole
you gave me a scenario that really doesn't compare at all...
it has the same concept on how teaching people bad things can lead to bad things
yes and you can see you've made the assumption here that lgbt=bad which just isn't true
not correct
you might think it's bad and whatever, you do you, but you can't make a objective statement like this
i havent even talked about lgbt, i am countering your argument that teaching people bad things is good
ive already left the lgbtq conversation
i can't really talk with you libya if you're not gonna bother saying anything interesting
Like, as a member of the community, I went through many years of doubts on my identity, I defo do not feel as If I identity fully as male, but, i get worried, if I was 10, 15, years younger or whatever, how would the modern social scene impact me as a troubled teen where all these answers for my confusion are floating around the place
so dont throw me under the bus
That Boris ay
again, you're implying that you think LGBT is bad, and that teaching people about it isnt good
yet raising awareness that people exist is good
taking your terrorism example: if there's a terrorist group, you would want to know they exist, where they operate and what they do, right?
i already stated that i left the LGBTQ argument and am countering another statement said. I do not have a problem with the lgbtq community as stated above.
also i said promoting it
you're just trolling then - because you've stated clearly that you think lgbt=bad but now you're denying it
pretty shit troll
many of our failings as a society is that we fail to teach the stuff we're not comfortable with
you're putting words in your own mouth
not correct
Theres a lot of history in books all around the world which misrepresent stuff or leave out huge chunks of history in the quest for their goals, it's part of why I think that vocational teaching for many subjects needs to go
Wait, not vocational, tested as a whole, I mean
Your ability to regurgitate history should not be tested, imho, the time would be better spent towards actually teaching the sins of our past
I think people should actually get to know some history though 🙂
History is pretty fact-based
Although you're right about it always being misrepresented
It's always written by the winners 😉
took the words right out of my mouth
it's the irony of the modern world
at our fingertips, we have access to more information than our parents or grandparents ever dreamed of
that's also what makes history an inaccurate subject in a lot of ways, there's no real objective sources
and yet it feels the further we go, the less we know
first person sources exist
yes, but they will always be biased to some extent
I think those are often biased too 🙂
depends on the topic
I mean, history is complicated
Yes 🙂
You don't know exactly what somebody was thinking and why they did something
At least in my country (America), it's become super politicized.
A lot of people want to try and kind of worship it. Other people kind of want to demonize it.
And a lot of it is for political reasons.
Some people treat history (or the demonizing of it) as almost like a pseudo-religion.
Like you've got some people, who look at our Founding Fathers and almost worship them as gods, and you've got others who obsess over the fact (most of them) owned slaves.
Like my little brother did a project on George Washington, and listed off all the good things about him.
Them my uncle told him he owned slaves, and he almost cried.
But the fact of the matter is they weren't a homogeneous group and they were just really regular people.
They did some great things, and they did some pretty bad things too (both with Indians and slaves).
But we often like obsess on them and either worship them or demonize them.
When they were both good and bad.
i think that describes the issue pretty well
pretty much, yea :/
I mean, it's the horrors of tryna paint everything black and white and throw a label on complex issues
We can all agree that slave ownership was bad, but, we I think that it's more than fair to say that those people also did their right in the world too, many even putting their lives on the line to fix their own wrongs
and it's sad that everything these days is left or right, theres no actual consideration to any of the intricacies of the issues, and that I think is one of the biggest problems with the world
we're much sooner to throw rocks at one another over ones political siding rather than actually dig into the real issues at hand and figure out how to address them
We all do
and it's important that we ackowledge that, but, we need to remain comfortable with the idea that your biases and such can change
Yeah. And considering other points of view is a really positive thing.
and that's why political debates always go to shit very fast 🙃
Usually you find out that people who disagree with you are actually pretty smart, and have their own points.
Well, because people just jump to "no, [blank] is evil"
yes, it just ends up at one side yelling without listening
alright I've got a bit of a rant
and the listening part is the single most important part
greg abbott is literally trying to get us texans killed
Breaking: Texans can carry handguns without a license or training starting Sept. 1, after Texas Gov. Greg Abbott on Wednesday signed the permitless carry bill into law. #TXlege https://t.co/NPWqDEoaXA
Hear me out: if you're using a handgun for self defense, and you don't have training, you are going to kill.
If you don't have training how are you supposed to know where to shoot to disable?
Yeah, I live in Arizona. Although we're kind of redish-purple, but surprisingly we are one of the most gun-friendly states.
I think that if you have a gun and aren't trained to use it you're a fucking moron and are responsible for any impact that they have
But, I mean, how often do you hear of a gun crime happening at a gun sale?
I'm not a big fan of guns in general, but guns are so ingrained into American culture that we really can't just ban them at this point.
Shamefully we live in a world where people wanna harm one another, and guns will always exist, even with the most strictest of laws in the UK, people are still getting murdered by guns
But like... if you need a license and training to drive a car, which has a risk of killing people, why not a gun?
Agreed.
Yes a car can kill people, but that isn't its explicit purpose
I very strongly believe in the right to self defense, but I think it should be regulated.
Given that some states the police response can be like, 30 minutes on a good day, I think people should have the means to defend themselves and I think that the overly restrictuve rules do very little good to actually reduce crime
They just happen to be able to, so we need to train people to not kill other people with their cars.
But guns are literally designed to kill or seriously injure.
That's it.
That's their explicit purpose.
Yeah, Chicago has some of the most restrictive gun laws, but they've got a very high murder rate. (of course the gun laws in britian work pretty well)
self defense imho should be accessible
I think that guns are often overly stigmitized themselves as a tool for self defence
take the UK
Another reason why we need strict gun training and licensing
When we're not shooting one another, we're stabbing one another
My high school government teacher explained it pretty well though. It's just the pro-gun people don't want to give an inch, and the anti-gun people don't want to give an inch. So they both go wayyy out of their way to go to insane extremes.
pretty much, yea
Even in self defense, one person shouldn't have supreme power over life and death with no consequences
Yeah. America has a serious gun problem, but it doesn't have to be that way. Switzerland has a very high gun ownership rate, but actually a below average murder rate.
If someone breaks into your home, they in all likelihood have less than pure intent at least
You have a right to live
yeah
I'm a firm believe that if somebody impedes on your right to live, they implicate their own
But if you can just kill people for a crime they could commit, you get a very bad place
Home intrusion by itself isn't a crime worthy of death
I mean, over in the UK you can literally get thrown into jail if somebody ends up dying if they break into your house and injure themselves
Switzerland gun meme
It shouldn't be jail time, but maybe like... taking away your gun license?
There was somebody where people came into their house with knifes or something, the guy tried to defend himself and in the moment basically ended up stabbing the people who broke into his house
the guy ended up serving a sentence for that
wow
If, as a civilian, you kill someone with a gun in self defense, you should lose the gun until you've got the skill to shoot to injure, even in a fairly high-stress scenario
Shoot to injure is stupid
Shoot to... disable?
Texas goes the other extreme, you can shoot somebody for just going on your farm or invading your property. You just have to give one warning.
From someone with 3 different firearms licenses, I’d like to say, it is entirely acceptable to assume the worst when your life or your families life is in danger.
Shoot-to-injure is almost always impossible, by the way.
Where do you shoot to disable?
still stupid
I'm told its just really hard to do in practice 😦
I’m not sure why that tagged you Cat, apologies
if someone is threatening your life you shoot to kill
you take out the threat
plain and simple
Once again, where do you shoot to injure?
I mean, what if they weren't threatening your life
How would you know? Those situations change in seconds.
then you can't legally shoot them
(except in texas 😉 )
That's the problem with the death penalty too - if you fuck up and shoot someone who wasn't trying to kill you... they're dead
And I think you should avoid using lethal force unless someone's life or safety is threatened
100%



basically, I'm against excessive lethal force
I mean I get that in rural situations it might take hours for cops to come, and there are farms and stuff.
But really that's pushing it.
This is what training expresses and stresses.
And that's why we need training
you can carry a handgun without a permit, however if you kill someone and weren't fearful for you life you could and probably be charged with 2nd or 3rd degree murder
You shouldn’t have to have it to defend yourself.
I mean, the issue is where to draw the line
Yeah. I think it's reasonable to require gun training for having a license.
At what point do you consider somebody shooting to be justifiable?
greg abbott: i'm gonna do what's called a pro gamer move
Yeah, we got it here in Arizona too.
Anyone over 21 can have concelled or open carry without a permit.
Its pretty insane.
They have the right to defend themselves though, no?
Like, at what point do you draw the line between being threatened and the justification for shooting?
Also, when we had the whole "emergency powers" thing during covid.
yeah, a majority of gun deaths happen from lack of training
The only restriction on the governors power was that he couldn't change gun laws.
You can still defend yourself with a license
Did you know that there have been studies which show that guy with a gun, man with a knife, man with a knife can easily win within a few feet?
Wow
(and often will*)
Right, not everyone has access to get a license as easily as you make it seem.
It doesn't impede you from using a gun in self defense, as long as you've proven you can handle a gun
Agreed. A lot of licensing requirements in general favor the rich and well connected.
I mean, it should still be fairly hard right?
And in many places these "concelled carry liceneses" are almost impossible to get. They're what's called "may issue"
If you can get a license and stuff for a gun in an afternoon, that's basically inviting shootings
Not at all.
I think it should really be kind of like a drivers license. Straightforward, but with still a good deal of requirement and training.
yeah it many states it is
Areas with high gun ownership have less gun crime
Yeah? In some places self-defense isn't even a valid reason to get a license.
*high legal ownership
I’m not sure where exactly you think people getting licenses equates to more crime
Legal ownership typically equates to less as cat stated
@mystic ermine Yeah, but I think a lot of that is correlation but not necessarily direct causation 😉
Not more people as a whole getting licenses, more people who shouldn't have a gun getting licenses
I mean
You can’t get a license if you’re a felon or have medical issues pertaining to mental health.
Are you gonna walk to the store in an area with high gun ownership and pull your firearm out on some randomer?
Because that's a direct symptom of giving out licenses willy-nilly
For example, it’s extremely difficult for me to buy a firearm where I live because I don’t live in the state I am licensed. I have to travel to said state, and the firearm has to be shipped there.
not to mention 98% of mass shootings happen in gun free areas
Interestingly enough the wild west had relatively low crime rates. However, people would often get drunk in bars and shot each other up. So they had relatively high murder rates.
But there were almost no murders outside of bars (and when there was, it would trigger an angry mob and a lynching).
I think that's the point which people fail to understand, even if you make guns illegal, you're never gonna get them off the street
if anything, you make it much more of a viable tool as you reduce the chance that somebody there is gonna have the stopping power against you
The problem is, where are all the good guys with guns?
I've never seen an article about a law-abiding gun owner stopping a shooting.
They definitely happen.
If they shouldn’t have a gun, someone somewhere knew they shouldn’t and provided them of one. No felon or mentally inept person is allowed to own a firearm. That’s law. The cases this happens, someone messed up and allowed it for sake of business or a sale.
They 100% happen
They're just not as publicized.
can I haz link
I mean, wouldn't they be everyhere?
They happen more often than murder
Like, I would've seen them brought up by now
I remember a video from a church where a guy came in with a shotgun and 2 people in the crowd killed him
Data from the FBI's Active Shooter Incidents in the United States in 2016 and 2017 report; legal civilian gun carriers tried to intervene in 6 out of 50 incidents, and apparently succeeded in 3 or 4 of them.
^
Here's one from reason, a libertarian think tank.
Yeah, it's definitely only a sometimes thing
We can't depend on people with guns protecting other people from a shooter.
Definitely
98% of all mass shootings happen in gun free zones
It's true
I mean, a lot of it is the phycological deterrent
so there's no good guys with guns to take out bad guys with guns
That's not necessarily just because it's a gun-free zone
But a higher percentage of success is better than none at all, no?
You're not going to go into a high gun ownership area and pull your arms out
But I still don't think that means you should necessarily be letting anyone bring a gun into a school.
I mean, gun free zones, the potential active stopping force in the area is minimal
I think it might make sense to have a couple teachers that are armed.
Does anyone have data on this?
Like, I'd like to see what the difference in overall violence is
yeah because after parkland we know we can't trust SROs
between more people having guns and less guns in total
The data is in response to what you took a screenshot of
Guns ar epractically illegal in the UK
We still have a gun crime issue
Just, ofc, not as much because most people with illegal firearms generally aim to not get caught, but, there are still the bunch who use them
The biggest thing is, people are gonna try and kill one another
We don't have shootings in schools, we just have the rare stabbing here and there
Yeah.
Issue with allowing certain people in buildings of gun free zones is the power trip that comes with being the person with a gun
I agree that might be an issue.
They key word there being rare.
People are corrupt
The downfall is is that in all of these causes, teachers don't have guns, teachers don't have the means to stop somebody with a knife
We're a small country
people like to kill people and we can't change that. we ban guns, they'll just move onto another thing
Honestly mass shootings an america are pretty rare too.
Comparing the US to the UK directly is stupidity
Gun crime isn't a binary issue - it's not that a gun crime happens or it doesn't
Lemme show you something
Key on mass shootings.
This is a list of shootings in the United States that have occurred in 2021. Mass shootings are incidents involving several victims of firearm-related violence. The precise inclusion criteria are disputed, and there is no broadly accepted definition.Gun Violence Archive, a nonprofit research group, run by Tracy Holtan, that tracks shootings and ...
they just get a lot of media attention
Gun crime in the US is disproportionately reported on in the US by media
A bug issue I see is that people compare raw numbers between countries and places like the US, where there are 51 states, each of which in the EU would basically be large enough to be its own country
two hundred forty seven shootings this year alone.
Well, I'm not saying they don't happen. I'm just saying you're probably more likely to get killed in the street walking to school, then you are in the school itself.
and America is the only country that includes suicides in gun death statistics
Yeah, but that doesn't mean we can just ignore the chance of getting killed at school.
but then why are you ignoring the chance of getting killed walking to school?
In America, we have far more worse shootings than virtually any other nation
Personally, the definition for mass shooting is not even really a good definition. 3 or more people is not a “mass” shooting. That could be a gang, small family, or random people. That definition has changed over the years as well.
No we don’t. Not even remotely close
The biggest problem with trying to combat anything related to mass shootings is people instantly think your about to ban all guns and raid their homes to take guns and become a dictatorship instead of the actual thing being addressed
Yes and the key is the shootings that happen in the inner city. There is a murder a day in Chicago.
BLM leader in the UK got shot
Less than half in the UK
It all comes from our poverty.
People in the UK went crazy, saying that nobody should get shot for their political beliefs
It's still horrific, but in the US I want to fucking cry.
Turned out that she got shot by 4 dudes who party crashed to take out somebody they where after
but the us also has a substantially higher population that the UK, so naturally we're going to have more shootings
Literally not heard about sasha I think her name was since
And that tells you all that you need to know about how shit like gun crime is treat in many places
I mean I was a victim of school violance. Someone threw a rock at my head in Middle School and I got a Traumatic Brain Injury.
links the sun, a tabloid
But it's still a relatively rare event.
I'm not particularly afraid of it happening again.
The US is 16th in Homicide rate/year per 100k population. Considering the amount of firearms owned, this is minuscule.
Yeah, we have more firearms than people.
Because we have gun nuts.
I just think we've got a lot of crime because we have a lot of poverty.
Most of which wouldn’t harm anyone in the course of their lifetime.
The scary part is, while the gun nuts are nuts, I don't believe that they're really an issue, outside of... well, clearly they have issues...
universal to the basic to the income
But, I mean, I was in the same sorta area, I lived in a sorta like old runned down industrial town in which was sorta failing, practically everywhere in my area was a council estate with high
Trying to narrow down why mass shootings happen to 1 reason is literally insane and a part of the reason why itll never be solved lol
Education fixes it in my opinion as well.
Detroit schools are still going to have a 20% literacy rates, even if you give them a universal basic income
Education is funded by property taxes
universal income ensures that you have a place to live and such, but, people always want more
in poorer neighbourhoods, the education is of less quality
I don't think funding is even the issue with teaching
Did you know baltimore teachers get paid over $100,000 a year on average
I mean, there are schools which have defo been let down to all shit
But, there was a recent article somewhere where somebody flunked
got like 0% on their test
their attendence was literally shit af, and the mother "didn't know" until the kid fucked the year up
Aside from my middle schools, we have excellent schools in my district (Vali). However, the school distrinct right next door (TUSD) is one of the worst in the nation yet their teachers get paid more on average.
Like, that's not a funding issue, that's a negligence issue, and the issue is that no schools are really measured on their metrics
I also believe it’s a respect issue. A lot of people grow up with really poor etiquette and the way they treat others also is a reflection of that. How to treat others, how to properly accept failure, things like that.
Our school district is just better-run, so we get better quality, even though teachers are paid a lot less and Arizona is 48th in School funding.
I mean, places often have two shades to it, you get the places where failing schools are defunded or dropped into oblivion, or you get places where they practically reward schools failing to all shit with more cash rather than pushing them to solve what is often issues administrative issues or people literally just not giving a shit so long as they get paid
Honestly if you are born in the inner sity, you have a really hard time getting out, and the only thing that's goona change that is a quality eduation.
it's why it pisses me off that school choice is often deemed as a huge massive no-no
I don't think school choice is a magic fix, but it's definitely a big thing.
