#politics
1 messages · Page 64 of 1
Something like allowing 3rd party app stores
Epic doesn't expect to get everything they want
We will see
If epic gets anything it would be being able to advertise another purchase location
Judging by the judges commentary
Which is already a huge win for all app developers
But 3rd party appstores won't happen, that literally outlaws walled gardens
Spotify has been demanding that for years
And hey, even if epic looses on all counts and apple isn't forced to change anything, we got an EU case in the works
And we a bit more progressive over here
Yeah you got a bunch of fucking morons
I mean, I can see that happening at some stage, provided Apple are allowed to dictate a warning and that the store cannot use the ApplePay thing.
the shit some of your anti trust members post on Twitter is so stupid
I also do not see why they couldn't allow third parties to have their own store, and their own store being able to award licenses to linked accounts.
When I watch American news I loose all faith for humanity
i.e. the store is on the web.
You can't even agree to investigate a terrorist attack on your capitol
but we still get shit done
meanwhile the EU is trying to generate revenue through antitrust fines alone
cannot wait for the day someone just tells them to fuck off
I would find that entertaining
And loose the european market?
Ppl thought that would happen with gdpr, but you all adopted our requirements
I would love to see who blinks first tbh
and gdpr is a drop in the bucket
outlawing a business model would fuck over a ton more
There are so many buisness models that are outlawed, I don't get that point
Oh no, we outlawed the buisness model of slavery, how will society survive that
good one?
That's a method of labor, not a business model.
slavery and walled garden are not remotely comparable
Unless you mean selling slaves
and this wouldn't just affect apple
Your Samsung smart fridge would now need to require 3rd party app stores
So would your smart toaster
Jokes on you, my Samsung smart fridge is android and allows sideloading
And yes, this kinda ties into right to repair, having access to the software of your devices is a good thing
right but the company should have a control of the experience
If the smart toaster doesn't want to allow 3rd party apps it shouldn't have to
I disagree
And part of what people pay for, like or not, when they buy an apple phone is the safety of a walled garden
Unless there is a technical limitation, an arbitrary restriction is anti consumer
Burry the switch for side loading deep down, if I toggle it, I knowingly throw away that sense of security
That's a really bad argument
So would you allow apple to void your warranty if you used 3rd party app stores
I think a company should be able to do that, just like a company should be able to preload apps. cough EU vs Microsoft cough
That's something worth thinking about actually. Since software could in theory damage the phone, that wouldn't be uncalled for
Ok at least you're consistent on that
But they should provide warranty if the damage is impossible to be cause by software
Yeah I'm fine with a button that comes up with a warning to accept, that allows you to install 3rd party stores that voids your warranty in the event of software fault.
Warrenty is a ew topic in general, companies get away with too much
I just feel that being forced to give users a pathway to void their warrenty is not ideal
I personally am for Apple having more freedom in the area of screwing their customers as much as possible, we all know they'd love to do more of it.
But like, if I can install a malicious app that destroys hardware, that's a pretty big deal for apple anyways, would be a huge security issue
No app should have that kinda access, sideloaded or not
Anyways, I gotta sleep, we will see what comes out of this
It's pretty clear that time and time again people have said "this EU regulation will destroy business and companies will just leave" but that literally never happens
Most are aimed at giant companies anyway. They cry publicly about it, implement the changes and move on to the next thing to cry about.
It's fun not having nicknames on Facebook anymore btw.
I don't think EU will destroy companies per say
Yeah, despite literally nobody knowing why they did that
Plenty of companies have continued to operate similar services, including all that child protection stuff they ranted about having to remove
Even outlawing walled gardens wouldn't destroy apple
It's just something that would probably end up having a negative effect in the long run
Yeah, but to whom is the main point of contention
Right
Idk most of the EU antitrust shit I see makes me think they're just trying to score optics points
Especially considering their lead members statements on Twitter
Pretty 
well the government is the most inefficient sector of the economy
yeah that's right
take a country like the us
look at the most inefficient sectors
they are all government run
The main reason I'm against antitrust used in the sense of walled gardens is it removes the option for a consumer to voluntarily engage in business with a company that offers that service
that's why coutnries likt ehs soviet union that had complete government control had lots of economic stagnation
Government inefficiency isn't generally something that kills a program
optics for who? the eu isn't some small fry political scene, it's a big fat bulky waste of space that doesn't do anything to score points or win votes
heck i wish they actually did lmao
Governments can't respond to market signals as fast but it doesn't mean you kill programs
That's generally what happens when you give a person a boat load of money and tell them to spend it wisely.
The govenrment needs to be abolished entirely tbh
if you want something done right hand it to the private sector
in fact, you could easily argue the eu ends up being the punching bag for a lot of these unpopular policies
doing that immediately would be chaos
yeah of course
Lol the anarchists found paper politics
we are anarcho capitalists
I don't like labels
Government can't realistically be abolished for a successful society. There has to be a body responsible for setting the standards by which we organize society.
No not really
nobody ends up saying "ah yes, the gdpr is great" but nobody in power stopped it going through
nap lmfao
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-aggression_principle#:~:text=The non-aggression principle (NAP,their%20property%2C%20is%20inherently%20wrong.&text=In%20contrast%20to%20pacifism%2C%20the%20NAP%20does%20not%20forbid%20forceful%20defense.
The non-aggression principle (NAP), also called the non-aggression axiom, is a concept in which "aggression", defined as initiating or threatening any forceful interference with either an individual or their property, is inherently wrong. It is considered by some to be a defining principle of libertarianism in the United States and is also a pro...
when did i fall into a crèche
NAP has nothing to do with societal organization?
well what did you mean by that then
Infrastructure?
this ^^^
Anarcho anything is mega cringe and there is a reason it never works
It usually is, but it's organized by goverment
anarcho-authoritarianism
take a look at industrial age Britain and tell me how unregulated capitalism works
nah it's fine all these private companies will just help those who can't help themselves
tell me where anarcho capitalism has been tried
that's my point
that's worked out so well this far
so with no government oh mighty ones
man, I dont know whatll happen if I blow myself up cause I havent tried it before...
That's a fallacy.
other people have....
but I havent, its different
that is literally nothing like how science works - you can postulate that 2+2!=5 without doing the workings out lmfao
okay .. that's not our argument
you dont know that, you havent tried it
Meh, not really
I'm not even engaging this shit lmfao if you believe in any kind of anarchy you're so far gone it's impossible to convince you of anything
thats basic science, you cant know the result of something without trying it
Wait are there real ancaps here?
yei
Here I am
The world has yet to try the government system by which everyone kisses my ass.
you know
I doubt that is a workable system however.
Our source for this is Ayn Rand
Ayn Rand fled the horrors of soviet communism in the 20s
Ayn Rand is a joke
clearly we cannot claim that a world society where we all worship me as a supreme deity is bad as it has not yet been tried
However, if you'd like to help me start trying that system, you're welcome to
Ayn Rand is one of the most famous novelists and philosophers of the 20th century. Her ideas about free markets and free minds still captivate millions. Gloria Alvarez with the Objective Standard Institute tells Rand’s fascinating story.
This episode was made possible by a generous donation from The Objective Standard Institute https://objectiv...
this is a good source
prageru lol
PragerU, this shit just keeps getting better
Prager 
prageru is pretty shit
Yeah pragerU is bad
prague u hahahahahahahaha
but this one video
lmfao
this one video is okay
I feel like I'm talking to a meme
sure jk sure
THIS ONE VIDEO
this is too good
this one video is clearly the diamond in the steaming warehouses full of shit
NOT THE WHOLE CHANNEL
"man this company sucks but since this one video agrees with me this one video is ok"
PragerU lol
I mean that does sound somewhat reasonable
Omega fucking lol
if you hate mcdonalds burgers you can still order their fries
Ok I'm gonna be more productive and go bang my head against the wall
then don't post the invite in r/anarchy
PragerUwU what the fuck is going on here
i'm sure you were 
i was so down for an interesting and nuanced discussion on eu vs us policies on consumer rights someone tell me why i expected that from #politics
oh man, this is great stuff
We can still have an interesting discussion
are you familiar with the economic calculation problem?
id rather go dev for yatopia than discuss the eu with an ancap
or we could debunk keynesian economics?
Don't try to make them cute OwO
yeah, more Yatopia Devs!
I mean, to be fair, just because most of someones ideas are insane, doesn't mean all of them are either; it's just a strong indication. You would however need to figure out why the particular idea you think is good is actually good, just because you agree with it isn't a good enough reason.
Keynesians don't understand economics
"great depression was caused by the private sector" stoopid
Yeah I prefer Ben Shapriowo
We haven't practiced Keynesian economics since the 70s anyway
Nah I'm talking about his superior weeb cousin
have you been hanging around r/neoliberal
xD
🤷
If you use Reddit at all you are immediately at a loss
biology 101 takes from #politics today
what's next, water is wet?
no
Water isn't wet it makes things wet duh
I took honors bio in 11th grade
the things include water tho chew
yeh exactly, so unless we have a single molecule of water, it's wet
I graduated on the exact bottom of my class in understanding the situation
11th grade?? does that trump my undergrad courses in gender theory???
yes
Water does some odd things above 374C
Man if there was a case for funding public schools
why did you say smth JRoy... smh
why do you think school grades are declining?
I've been to public and charter, and college, they all suck
hi olivia
idk I'm sure you're familiar with that tho
Why am I so famous now
I don't know you
I only know Rory fans
Ah this is the context, i was confused why you were pinging her lmao
chew hangs out with ancaps? 😱
guys don't mind matt
he likes to strutt around like a toddler expecting people to take his cereal box police badge seriously
that's a bit harsh
but you get the picture

Who's that
Listen I don't remember names if you're on 2 different servers I treat you as 2 different people
Unless you have literally any notability
Everyone I have an important announcement
I strongly dislike bashar al-assad
carry on now
Ah yes. I totally understand Economist. https://twitter.com/theeconomist/status/1399140827901923331?s=21
The government blames Marxist militants for the killing of 16 people; the local mayor suggests drug traffickers could be responsible
What government? Where? Doesn’t matter. It’s The government
Oh, an ancap showed up here
The problem with anarcho-capitalism is that while its tenets look good on paper, in practice it would basically result in replacing the state with some corporation acting in the capacity of a state (and likely dissolving into little city-states not before too long). Minarchism does a bit better here by whittling down the government to do little more than the courts, law enforcement, and a military, but then how do you fund the operation of a minarchist government? Under the NAP, would people in an anarcho-capitalist society be willing to find the state even in its truncated form? And I think the answer is "no". Many right-libertarians oppose taxation with the reasoning that it is a taking of property. Would they suddenly be okay with a minarchist government having a taxation system?
In my view, the NAP is precisely the tenet that causes the right-libertarian government to fail at its job.
Eh, what can I say? I'm an admirer of left-wing ideology.
LeftValues says I'm a democratic socialist.
I should probably also mention that an anarcho-capitalist society would be hardly competitive. The amount of bureaucracy potentially required would be almost comical.
It would make the present-day US federal government look sane in comparison.
Apparently I am also eco-anarchist
Anarchist, democratic socialist, or left-wing nationalist, take your pick.
lol it basically just called you naive
fuckin machine
Didn't really know how to answer some of the questions because I just disagree with their entire premise
Didn't know whether to answer them as a socialist or not so I kinda swapped halfway thru
i did a different version of that test and with conservative answers, got social libertarian
i guess i'm a neoliberal/centrist after straying as a dem soc for some time lol
Feel like labels are only used to put you down in the first place
You can't really do the test if you're not a leftist imo it kinda falls apart and doesn't really work
Never heard of market anarchism before https://leftvalues.github.io/results.html?a=27.9&b=48.4&c=38.3&d=46.4&e=44.2&f=55.6&g=38.2
pretty sure that's called mutualism
Mutualism is an anarchist school of thought and economic theory that advocates a socialist society based on free markets and usufructs, i.e. occupation and use property norms. One implementation of this system involves the establishment of a mutual-credit bank that would lend to producers at a minimal interest rate, just high enough to cover adm...
yesterday was the last day for the texas legislature and they didn't get to pass their voting bill because the democrats just walked out of the building lol
jesus christ, this is terrible
That's my second closed match ^^
you were my next closest match too 
A loooot of the questions were pretty yikes
Like.. hmmmm, nothing could possibly go wrong with instituting a global single party authoritarian regime
The 8values test?
Yeah
Yup
That’s it
Yeah this LefrValues test is not for me
It assumes you are already very left leaning or a straight up socialist
Yeah lol, my pal scored the same
Don’t think anyone here is extreme enough for LeftValues
We all seem to share similar beliefs for the most part
There is another site that has even more questions, can't remember it's name tho.
Ah yes, 9Axes.
My friend linked me 12 values lol
For the most part you will get the same results
Just more questions
675 values
My god
I don’t have the mental capacity to answer 216 questions to learn what I already know
Could take the political compass test
A lot of people don’t like it but I don’t think it’s too bad
the clue is in the name.. left values
it's a leftist political compass test
Werd
Sure but I’m leftist and it’s still too extreme for me
I took it and like most normal people got centered on mostly everything
Only on a leftist test could I be 48% conservative
i mean it defines leftist as socialist
if you're not a socialist it's pretty impossible to answer the questions
“Centrist Marxism”
what would you say you are?
because leftist is a very specific term that is different from stuff like left-wing or left-leaning
most of the left isn't socialism
lol
which is why its pretty silly to make a "left values" quiz that doesn't work if you're not a socialist
In the US at least my impression was to be a leftist rather than a liberal you had to at least be at the Democratic Socialism level
i mean i feel like at least a socialist or of that ilk is a completely reasonable line to draw for leftist
i was talking more with the two general concepts of left and right
SocDem
i guess if you want to go more deeper you could say leftist implies socialism
True
i mean i think you'd find a lot of people who would reasonably say that socdem isn't leftist
but like leftist isn't descriptive
considering in the US we consider dems = left, repub = right
In the US a SocDem would be considered leftist
maybe, but we're not all in the US
and a political ideology being on the left side of the overton window of a country's politics doesn't make it leftist
True but the test never claims it’s specifically meant for outside the US. I’m not entirely sure what countries wouldn’t consider a SocDem a leftist.
being critical of heirachy, anti-capitalist, proponent of more direct forms of democracy
well at least SocDem/socialist refer to specific policies
ah ok, I'd define that as socialism then
as well as all the standard pro equality, yadda yadda
I’m for just about all of those besides anti-capitalism... I’m for socialist reform and restricted/regulated capitalism but not a fully socialist society
then yeah it's no surprise you didn't enjoy that test
I’d still consider myself a leftist though
I fit just about all of the beliefs, if the deciding factor is socialism then guess I wouldn’t be but I never thought it was.
I mean it's a subjective label anyway
It doesn't mean anything
at least across political cultures it is
i think one of the core tenants of leftism is being anti-capitalist - that's where the term originates from and what most people agree with
most people in the united states won't agree with that
but yeah, it's all arbitrary and meaningless anyway - as the high value for constructivism on my test would tell you :')
I mean you could even call me anti-capitalist just not to the extent of completely replacing it with something like socialism
I heavily criticize capitalism
I mean all Dems are critical of capitalism, just the socialists think the solution is replace the entire economic system with worker co-ops while everyone else is for government checks
I’m not exactly for government checks. I believe the government covering certain services and necessities is a good investment for our economy..
Oh lol
Yeah sure
I think a mixture is a viable option
Socialist and capitalist values
well no there is nothing socialist about socdems
I think both a pure free market and pure socialist society are both bad ideas
socialism is worker co-ops towards abolition of capital (depending on who you ask)
Right and this is the difference between Social Democrats and Democratic Socialism, even though in the US they're treated as the same thing
Some would consider universal government funded services to be socialist, though some call Joe Biden socialist as well....
(we like to butcher terminology)
socialism has nothing to do with government services
yeah and some people are idiots :')
welfare isn't intrinsically socialist idea
totally possible under capitalism
socialism is public ownership of the means of production, and there's a lot of ways to go about that, which is why there's so many different types of socialism
well not public ownership, worker ownership
Can people not have some form of ownership in the means of production within a somewhat free market?
same thing
arguably that's stock options for employees
What if employees are given shares within the company as a benefit
Right
I wouldn't call that socialism as socialism implies the workers have the only say
socialism doesn't think managers/ceos/etc provide utility and don't deserve say
(depending on who you ask)
these people never agree with each other
workplace democracy 🤩
It socialism but definitely a socialist ideal, you are giving the workers some mean of ownership within the company
in the context of socialism, it is the same thing; public = social ownership = worker ownership
ok
Not the most viable source
Always was told Socialism was the workers owning the means of production
Not simply the public
i know that's from investopedia, but go read more socialist literature; they use these terms synonymously
Ie government owns the factory in place of the workers
It's not about managers specifically, it's about people making money just because they have money even though they don't really do anything
right, It implies anybody other than people doing physical work provide no extra utility
That usually gets expanded to people making "too much" money for the work they do
This is a real problem but usually only at the top of the org chart
The first layer or two of management are usually very busy people and if they make more money than workers it's not an obscene amount more
It is usually in the land of execs where things can get corrupted.
Yep, that's where they start making 100x what the workers do and seem to play golf half the day
yep, I don't see how it can be deemed meritocratic that executives get that kind of pay/bonuses for the work they produce
depending on the amount of workers, shifting an exec's pay to worker isnt that meaningful
£48,000 every hour of every day
for a casino i don't doubt it lmfao
Well, no, but the problem is that worker pay hasn't kept up with inflation because they wanted to give more money to shareholders instead
casinos have their own moral problems outside of whatever economic system you're in tho
their workers must have decent pay anyways considering its gambling
Executive pay also growing faster than inflation just makes the disparity obvious
oh, that is also including shares, its not salary alone
I'm not really that opposed to capitalism and markets, but it just seems wasteful that so much money ends up in the hands of executives that don't seem to deserve it
ah then its a bit misleading
people love to treat shares as liquid as cash
because it looks good in a headline
:>
bet365 also paid a dividend of £95m, signalling a separate windfall of around £45m for Coates, who owns more than half of the empire she built out of her father Peter’s Stoke-on-Trent bookmaking business.
most execs are shareholders
where does it say that the £421mill comes from shares? It says that Bet365 also paid out dividend
Eh, I don't think compensation in the form of stock being included in income is misleading
it totally is
shares arent fixed
like jeff beezo can't spend 1 trillion tomorrow
No but he didn't get given $1t in stock yesterday either
80% of his assets cannot be converted to cash remotely easily if not at all
selling stock as a c level or any other management level employee is a pita
and doesn't happen on giant scales
if it does, it's every once and a while
also selling stock also implies losing the control it awards
It does, you just don't pay attention 😛
oh, she owns 50% of the company
yeah, the pay makes sense really, at least the amount per year
under a prearranged trading plan
I guess i was implying it doesn't happen randomly
you have to disclose these things months in advance
Sure, you have to announce "I'm going to sell 1 million shares a month starting in 6 months" or whatever
atleast bezos isnt a total scumbag when it comes to his shares, zuckerberg is horrible in selling shares, expecting his shares to be non-voting when he sells off
And that is why you have to include stock when talking about yearly income for executives
if you want to talk about stock liquidated sure
but anything else is misleading
like i hate people throwing around net worth
I just think of it as "instead of getting $10m cash they let someone buy them $10m in stock instead"
It might be cheaper for the company to give out $10m worth of stock but when they were negotiating the contract this is how both sides were thinking about it
i mean paying ceos in stock makes alot more sense than cash too
incentives them to better the company
I'm also a fan of giving employees stock too
which sucked when amazon moved to $15/hr, they stopped giving stock to workers
so they get to say "

look at us we pay $15/hr, it should be the law of the land 

" when it's just worse for their workers and a $15/hr wage would literally only benefit companies like them
amazon isnt the best company either, knowing that other companies would struggle going to $15/hr
hell, target still has issues going to $15/hr, reducing hours employees work
my point was bigger companies have the better chance at paying out $15/hr
since they have larger profits and can cut into it
hell big companies would probably love $15/hr
Thanks to Twitter now I know there are apparently KKK beauty pageants and someone kind of famous won one
I have no idea who this person is
that?
Yeah
i mean i don't think they knew much of what was going on
doubt they're actually racist then let alone today
it really is something that Ellie Kemper was the star of a tv show about a woman who leaves a racist cult and tries to rebrand herself while pretending it never happened. no reason why I'm bringing this up of course.
1482
11773
I also have no idea what he is talking about 😛
But that seemed like a real 🤔 tweet
Yeah I don't think you're going to make it
With that attitude you are not gonna take part in this channel for long, lol
so, what is justice if morality is subjective? i feel like this is a question that needs answering
because if politicians are going to make any sense of coherency to the people they serve, this is something that people need to think more on, I feel
i'm not sure what you guys think about this
In most of Balkan, money does the talking. Morality is ignored by the politicians if a bit of money is involved.
hard to get away from that honestly
Justice is just what the majority thinks (hopefully in a democracy). The majority thinks robbing a store is not allowed, therefore people who do rob a store are punished.
Spain got a good idea tho: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/17/world/europe/spain-corruption-rehab.html
Oh man, what a horrible idea of justice you have. If the majority thing it’s ok to murder someone, it’s OK?
alright, well the majority thought it was ok to buy people up as slaves, quite awhile ago (fortunately that is not the case the majority of the time today)
Justice cannot be entirely defined by a democracy.
Apparently so
Not something I agree with, but if the majority does...
Doesn't the US have a law bypass thing that you shouldn't talk about and only comes into effect if everyone agrees?
So slavery is OK to exist simply of a majority if the people say yes. That’s horrible.
jury nullification
Slavery is “justified” if a majority are OK with it.
Well. Looking at the Amazon workforce, by the looks of it, yes.
Don't take that as I think it's correct. I don't.
No, but you are saying it’s justified. Even if you don’t agree with it, it’s justified simply because 50%+1 say yes
democracy is the best route, if you want to have a society of people with a bunch of different views, otherwise there is oppression (think totalitarian regimes)
Ultimately what will happen in a democracy is that the majority agrees on something and that is in the end what will happen. If a majority thinks slavery is okay, slavery will become a thing again.
I swear I just watched a Philosophy Tube video about this
In the US, the government is setup to protect against the tyranny of the majority
Ensuring that a majority cannot vote away their rights
How will a democracy do something the majority is against? A party is created that wants to allow slavery again or a party switches view points to agree with it, and more and more people vote for that party (since a majority agrees with them). That party will lead and they will try to change the law. I don't see how in the end that will not happen?
You can’t make slavery legal in the US with 50%+1
And my problem is that you think justice is defined by whatever the majority thinks
It might happen, but it’s not justice
problem with that then is it's OUR justice, not theirs or yours, but OURS
Well, let me rephrase, I don't think it's correct, I don't think it's justified, but globally that's what will happen.
Ok, sure. That’s fine. But justice isn’t subjective in that macro of a sense
Obv a majority can change smaller things, but it’s can’t be justified to murder someone in cold blood simply because most people don’t have a problem with it
yet if it's OUR justice, why? just because we want that? if there is no objective reason we want justice, and just want it "just because", well... that's not really justice at all
Not a singular case, no. If I kill some shitty person, a majority may agree that they deserved to die, but I'm definitely going to prison. But if a majority agrees, and the laws change over time and now suddenly allow for people to kill whoever they feel like, well, then everyone can kill whoever they want.
yeah that's scary
I mean, moral and societal justification is basically a slider
We these days can say murder is wrong
We these days can say slavery is wrong
If morality was objective, this wouldn't be an issue, but it isn't and we want some rules, so those rules are decided by the majority
But, back in the old days, things like slavery was not seem as an issue
i operate on the view that morality is objective
Like, you're basically sitting on a high horse in which much of your whims have been satified by a machine
considering the opposite view, that it is subjective, merely the fact that killing someone because you want to has the same moral value as donating to a charity, i don't want someone with that view making laws
shamefully many nations considered there to be lesser people to take that part of the supply chain for stuff like your food, etc, and, it's wrong, but, practically everybody here has clothing on their back likely made in some chinese sweat factory
yet, with that view, living with rules is the same as living without rules
to say we need rules to live is saying that it is objectively better to live in a society with rules than to live in one without
If I had to choose between living in a society where everyone can do whatever they want and a society in which there were at least some basic rules in place ensuring that some random person isn't going to shoot me because they feel like it, I'd choose the latter.
Of course not every society with rules is better than a society without rules, it very much depends on the rules in place.
yeah, that seems to work the best is when we have rules to live by
Hot take: water
I show off my favorite toxic chemical and drink a hopefully non lethal amount of it.
Here is a link for more info on this chemical: http://www.dhmo.org/facts.html
Since YouTube is probably going to demonetise this, you can help me make videos by donating here: https://www.patreon.com/CodysLab
Follow me on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/codyd...
While that is true I think it’s a bit vague and may confuse some people (and potentially cause people misrepresenting socialism through equivocation), so I think this is a better descriptor:
• surplus product defined by the planned net output ratio of consumer goods to capital goods
• this in turn defines a planned ratio of the workforce producing items of consumption to non consumption output
• determined at the level of society as a whole, not emerging from private contract
• surplus value does not go as personal consumption of an owner class
@surreal delta if there is one thing I learned about socialism, is that no one, not even socialists, define the term socialism the same.
From my observation, most definitions of socialism from socialists are the same just different wording
ive had things wildly different, either to just higher taxes, more welfare (nordic model) to more inline communism
a shit ton of people just throw around the word because its hip and cool without knowing anything about it
socialism clearly means having works seize the means of production via worker co-ops anything else is a misuse of the word
pretty much
and co-ops dont really work that well on scale unless you have force to back it, which in turn leads to some form of communism
well yeah there are fundamental problems with socialism and worker co-ops in general
such as: how do you raise capital because worker co-ops would never get investors; if there is no capital, what businesses do the government approve and how does the government decide that; what amount of violence is acceptable in order to transition to socialism; how do people get assigned jobs without capital incentive; how does socialism create market signals
I always thought of realistic worker co-ops being something more like a not-for-profit organization but in the end you can probably extrapolate any system to being effectively a benevolent dictatorship
That's less true of a capitalist system but still the case
yeah co-ops can work for businesses that don't get investors or like a family business
Something like a cross between a guild and a not-for-profit organization
Basically the union owns the business
Then you turn every business into a mini-democracy. Union leaders can do whatever they think is right but if enough of the workers disagree they get voted out of their positions. If the workers insist on people who are bad at their jobs the company fails.
Everything I think of just devolves to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rStL7niR7gs though
Adapted from 'The Dictator's Handbook': http://amzn.to/2fgBWps
Part 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ig_qpNfXHIU
Grey discusses this video on Cortex: https://youtu.be/ILvD7zVN2jo
Che Greyvara T-Shirt: http://cgpgrey.com/chegrey
Special Thanks:
Bruce Bueno de Mesquita & Alastair Smith
&
Mark Govea, Thomas J Miller Jr MD, dedla , Robert ...
uhm socialism historically has been against capitalism
Anyways it’s just semantics, if you want to discuss socialism we need to mutually define it temporarily for our discussion to carry on
well yes socialism is an economic model that cannot coexist with capitalism so i would imagine it's against capitalism
I was just explaining what socialism implies
worker co-ops imply businesses?
worker co-ops are one of the goals of socialism
socialist movements were historically against businesses and for planned economy
that's more communism
socialism is sometimes called a transition between capitalism and communism
communism is a specific ideology, socialism is a broad ideology that overlaps with many subvarients
socialism doesn't imply the abolition of businesses, rather the workers and only the workers should have complete control of businesses
Anywho, socialism was popularized by Lenin not by Saint Simon/Proudhon so it doesn’t matter
I wouldnt say popularized, but implemented in some way
there were people before lenin who wanted to transition away from capitalism of the late 1800s and early 1900s but didnt have the means to overthrow the current governments at the time.
Whom are largely irrelevant in history
Russia was perfect to overthrow considering how weak it was even before the world war
well actually Lenin overthrew the government that overthrew the czar
yeah mensheviks overthrew the tsar
paris commune
The "famous-name" philosophers that have advanced their -ism arguments have classically done so in a zero-sum context. Lemming advocates have, most often, continued the zero-sum arguments. It is a false narrative (and unimaginative) that implementing the -isms is a zero-sum game. Absolutely, the various and associated (in topic) -isms can co-exist; it simply takes honesty, willingness and open-mindedness.
Modernity disrupts (but does not eliminate) the maths of supply, demand, and greatest benefit (utilitarian) potentials. Too often now, stale-beliefs and bully-beliefs poison the forum that is absolutely necessary for a truthful, shared understanding of experimentation, evolution, and adoption of "better".
Ultimately, the push and pull comes down to the seeming eternal struggle AMONG the rights of the many AND the rights of the few or one. The "and"/"among" are critical to reframe the necessary and proper inclusive union of sets and subsets that the voices of "WE" (complete and entire sum of all life) need to argue for [ed opportunity,] support and survival. And where any member of WE has no voice, trustee voices with agency must be given fair access to the forum.
Well, at least they know what the people of West Virginia could want: money, trucks, and guns. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JMeEyLCWRBA
As 41 percent of West Virginia residents are fully vaccinated against Covid-19, the state is stepping up its incentives for vaccinations by offering trucks and guns to those who receive at least one dose of the vaccine. NBC News’ Gary Grumbach breaks down how West Virginia is hoping to bolster its vaccine rate with these new prizes.
» Subscrib...
...shit https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-diehard-right-wing-multimillionaire-replacing-israels-netanyahu
I saw that on Twitter, I laughed so hard
NM-01 special election was won by Democrats as expected. But what you probably didn't expect was the margin. About the same as Biden's win there.
I welcome that, then Germany finally can stop supporting that fucking country
That's good news for Democrats - perhaps 2022 may go better for them than the usual pattern.
It also comports with Republicans trying every attack they can against Biden and failing, therefore they have to attack Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, Bernie Sanders, and the Squad just to get anywhere.
they could've have been on track w/ vaccines already (and im not even kidding you even slightly when i say this) but the government forgot to sign the paperwork in a timely manner. @near glen @opal moat
🙃
literal amateur hour
🙃
Which gov, Philippines?
yes
But they signed smth now?
Yeah they have a program now but it could've started in January instead of April
But some guy literally didnt sign the paperwork
All he had to do was sign it
:))
But at least there's a path now?
yea that's true ig
Just gonna post this here cause it got drowned out in #general
My foray into the Twitter comments begins once again
https://twitter.com/william85854296/status/1400525084616544262?s=21
@TheRealOJ32 Killer Eulogy Juice! Took a good stab at this one
One of OJs lawyers died and OJ weighed in on Twitter
lol
BREAKING: City workers begin clearing George Floyd Square, the south Minneapolis intersection where George Floyd was killed. https://t.co/Iserp0Qkix
395
772

City council and mayor said they weren't notified of it happening until after it was cleared an hour later.. how
wasn't that square really hostile
Facebook decided politicians aren't immune from their rules anymore but Trump's ban is only for 2 years
Relevant as the Trump administration warned against paying ransomware ransoms, and the Biden administration is now treating ransomware on par with terrorism
So just like Russia?
Although blame mostly resides with (1) cryptocurrency people and (2) Microsoft for producing a hilariously insecure operating system
i mean i think most the blame is the people creating the ransomware
Thing is @pure jetty, if you read the article, cryptocurrency is pretty much the major channel the ransomware gangs use for payment
How do you shut down the ransomware gangs? You need to cut off their way of getting payments.
This necessitates at the very least very strict regulation of cryptocurrency. That's a non-starter for crypto people as they hate regulations (the less so that more suckers can be sucked into the system).
im for regulating cryptocurrency like a kind of security
but like at the same time, most of the blame is still on the people actually doing the crime 😄
terrorism charge seems fair
Do I for a minute believe Russian authorities are going to deal with ransomware gangs? They probably won't. The gangs only target non-CIS countries.
There's a reason why most ransomware will refuse to activate on a system with Russian, Ukrainian, or Byelorussian language packs - they would like to avoid criminal prosecution in their home countries.
What's to say this isn't a framing mechanism
Well, and the cybercriminals mostly offer their services... on Russian cybercriminal forums.
True, but do you think for a moment the North Koreans would send their crack team of cybercriminals to jail? They're responsible for obtaining revenue for their nuclear program and for the Kim family's personal use.
If anything that's an argument for shutting down cryptocurrencies altogether.
Nah. Just the language check isn't too definitive to determine which country the attack is coming from
I thought ransomware was normally done via phishing
Can't stop stupid
Not Microsoft's fault 😛
You get one workstation and hopefully it has access to something important or the network security isn't setup right and it has access to basically everything
Toyota invented Just In Time inventory management which is the cause of all of this but amusingly they're one of the least harmed by it now (at least in Japan) because as much as possible they work with companies close to their plants
It doesn't matter whose/whats'-at-fault, the problem is multi-vector weakness; the union of which is a set of human frailties that exploit the gaps between:
- due-diligence vs laziness,
- individual rights vs collective rights,
- private property vs public property,
- accountability vs liability, and
- perception of potential risk vs cost of actual risk.
So long as the problem is being dealt with in the realm of economics and game theory, solutions will remain in the realm of half-measures. Unless and until the pain becomes a collective pain, the human collective will refuse to be motivated to a change in behavior.
Looks like Microsoft said it was human error, that searching “tank man” on bing images showed no results. So it probably was a config leak into us servers or whatever. Still, can’t say I’m a fan of it at all.
"human error" of giving in to an authoritarian government more than intended...
Mm hmm 😛
i'm on a server full of stalinists and tankies
one of them compared the tiananmen square protest to the fascist march on rome

wut? I mean, they believe the ideology made by a person who pretty much ordered the deaths of millions of people directly/indirectly and yet call that a fascist march?
I mean, china is bordering on fascism at this point.
$100k… that’s nuts
what? how does that own her? lol
Yeah, I know the context.
is there something im not getting?
Her initial reply to Matt Walsh is the trigger for that I think
Saying “…instead of only caring for [my own grandmother] & letting others suffer, I’m calling attention to the systemic injustices…”
I mean it’s obv a stunt, everything is a stunt nowadays
yeah that was the context
also i want to know the chances of her mom actually taking that money

haven't they already tried the humiliating aoc strategy before
when they posted those videos of her dancing in college
I wish someone would humiliate me by giving my mom thousands of dollars for free 🥺
Gosh that would be so terrible!!
I bet Walsh will put some of that money into his dead podcast
CAs 32-year assault weapons ban was overturned today.
Ruling stayed 30 days for state to appeal
Donald trump emailing me about getting banned from Facebook
Man, HN, please never change
Read the thread about the G7 tax thing
First comment I see
"I do wonder if we wouldn't be better off eliminating corporation tax entirely."
That comment has 300 replies, lmao
probs save a good chunk of money in the process
Imho, I'd be looking at reducing taxes but closing up all the holes in the system
Like, with how much companies scapegoat taxes, especially the big multinationals
Biggest issue however is how freely these companies can move, hence why it takes something like a few countries agreeing to solve the issue to get anywhere
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-eyes-congress-run-to-become-speaker-and-impeach-biden-2021-6
fuck
he's gonna be campaigning two years earlier than we expected
For companies, lmao
Issue is, this is an international problem, and it's really hard to get everyone to agree
Like, even this agreement now will prolly never be written down since the republication in the senate in the US would destroy it
Cause they have, uuuhm, let's say, conflicting interests
Heck, with current parliment, am not even sure there's a majority in our parliment
Thankfully we got a election that will nuke conservatives (well really, they are pesky neo liberals) out of office
We got polls where the greens (progressive, environment, social) have more votes than the conservatives, lol
They had 8.9% last time, now survey at 25%
While conservatives went down from 33% down to 24
You don’t have to run for the House to be speaker really.
The house chooses its own speaker, doesn’t have to be a member
Kinda interesting, since the speaker is 3rd in line to the presidency
I really wonder what a progressive Germany will do to Europe
Going to be hard for Trump to run for anything while banned from Facebook and Twitter, that was how he did all his campaigning
Looks like Manchin once again, reiterated that he’s not voting for the For The People act, or to abolish the filibuster
this explains why i have been getting tons of trump emails the past week
i've gotten one every single day for past week
no idea how they keep getting my email or resubscribing me
assuming they honor unsubscribing
they legally have to
But, no promises of how
inb4 some unpaid intern gets emails over unsubscribe requests and they have to remove them from the DB manually or some shit
THE UNPAID INTERN WILL GET TO IT GIVES US TIME SHEESH
yeah it might be illegal but email spam industry is not really going to ever follow those laws
What the fuck? https://apple.news/AzsSLsIWAQm-0gOOLrBTXDQ
Others are noting this, but it can't be shared enough: Donald Trump gave his big speech today with his pants on backwards. Look close and tell me I'm wrong.
https://t.co/sRsoJVfyf8
13358
54169
Meh, might be photoshopped
Still funny
that doesnt look photoshopped
That's why I shared it, but some dude in comments thinks it might be
So added the disclaimer
I've heard it was diapers
Things could get ugly again if Donald Trump continues to rile up his supporters...
Follow Destiny
►STREAM - http://www.destiny.gg/bigscreen
►DISCORD - https://discordapp.com/invite/destiny
►REDDIT - https://www.reddit.com/r/Destiny
►INSTAGRAM - https://www.instagram.com/destiny
►TIKTOK - https://www.tiktok.com/@destiny?
►MERCH - https://shop.de...
@EricSwalwell Well, Swalwell FINALLY did his job, served complaint (on my WIFE).
HORRIBLE Swalwell’s team committed a CRIME by unlawfully sneaking INTO MY HOUSE & accosting my wife!
Alabama Code 13A-7-2: 1st degree criminal trespass. Year in jail. $6000 fine.
More to come!
231
903
This man posted a photo to twitter with his gmail password taped on his monitor in view LMFAO 
think he's on some security counsel committee too lmfao
Only in Alabama smh
Love that it's almost been 24 hours and he still hasnt taken it down
Those passwords are so easy to guess too
It's just combinations of his and his wife's names and birthdays
What's FRA?
Foia is freedom of information act, right? What does this mean in this context?
Federal Records Act, I think
When I google FRA I only get the Frankfurt Airport or some railroad stuff
Oh
You mean he can't delete cause it's public record?
No, you mean deleting doesn't change stuff cause its persisted as part of public record?
You could easily argue he uses this twitter account for official business so then what tweets should and shouldn't be covered by that gets real blurry
yeah Federal Records Act doesn't prevent you from deleting the tweet iirc but it will be entered into the archives either way
Trump is not well.
Biden defending trump damn
That's SOP for statements by officials made in response to questions made by the press even after they've left office.
The case in general is a absolute joke though. She's suing him for denying her allegations were true, thus will have to prove them or faces a counter-suit that is far more likely to succeed on face value.
I think this article tries to say taxing unrealized gains is how it should work
taxing unrealized gains is mega cringe, at least in regards to stocks
It defines the “true tax rate” as the taxes paid over the wealth increases in the same time period. That’s not how income taxes work 😅
I saw a good example, I’ve got a baseball card that’s super valuable, it goes up in value every year, and I gotta pay taxes just cause I own it? If I sell it, that’s income and that’s fair to be taxed
Yeah, so that article says the 25 richest people paid a “true tax rate” of 3.4% cause their wealth rose 401 billion from 2014 to 2018 and they paid 13.6 billion in taxes that same time period
i mean the better example is stocks where if you start seeing massive increases to the point where you need to sell stock in order to pay the taxes
thus being forced to sell control of your company
Yeah, the taxes can be more than the value of the stock possibly too.
I hate the phrase “tax avoidance”. Like, who doesn’t try to pay a little tax as possible, so is it really needed to use a negative phrase like that to describe something?
i mean ideally we give more money to the irs to actually look into tax fraud more
but tax avoidance is a weird word
technically true, they hire people to pay as little taxes as possible which is expected
Oh sure, finding more fraud is great. But yeah, people pay money to someone else to reduce the amount in taxes they end up paying. Clearly that’s worth hiring someone for lots of people
Lol
Musk responded to an initial query with a lone punctuation mark: “?” After we sent detailed questions to him, he did not reply.
I’ve never been a fan of the IRS personally. Twice my company got Audited because someone in the IRS legitimately did not understand how research funding worked, especially regarding new technologies. They swore we were stealing money or misusing it. 2 lawsuits, 8 years later, and a bunch of BS, we finally got them to leave us alone.
They’re a plague. Had to fly out to their office on 3 occasions to basically tell them the person leading the IRS audit was inept and clueless about how it all worked.
If we could avoid them completely and use another method I would be ALL for it. But, I’m probably super biased after that experience.
It would be nice if only the states handled taxes, not the federal government
libertarian party of New Hampshire going full ancap mode
Legalize child labor.
Children will learn more on a job site than in public school.
1006
3993
well, apparently children have will but not consent, so... they can't be held against their will but yet they can't will themselves to work a job? i don't get this
or perhaps public school should be more interactive than trying to learn to memorize long swaths of text to end up getting a passing grade on quizzes/tests
The replies to this tweet are brutal
(I mean the child labor one, mine is one of the replies)
Over half
And while Yugoslavia wasn't directly part of the warsaw pact, it maintained strong subjugation to the soviets until 91
Which makes pretty much the entirety of the balkans an ex soviet puppet state
you wut
Gonna need a source for the claim that it was under subjugation by the soviets until 91'
when yugoslavia basically loathed the soviets
The Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, commonly referred to as SFR Yugoslavia or simply Yugoslavia, was a country in Southeast and Central Europe that existed from its foundation in the aftermath of World War II until its dissolution in 1992 amid the Yugoslav Wars. Covering an area of 255,804 km2 (98,766 sq mi), the SFRY was bordered by t...
what about it
Bruh.
wikipedia isnt a source bro
I see someone didn't look up Tito. 

Pretty much all socialist/communist countries had to maintain strong ecomomic bindings towards the soviet union
Most intelligent Westerner
No, they didn't
Albania cut them off
Then I might be mistaken
Tito–Stalin split
Stalin considered Tito a traitor and openly offered condemnation towards him.
Understandable bro.
Wikipedia is probably the most reliable source for larger topics at least
Having so many people validify and create a single page makes it pretty much impossible for one party to change anything with it going unnoticed
Same reason linux is more secure and stable
A series of incidents in 2009 led to Church of Scientology-owned networks being blocked from making edits to Wikipedia articles relating to Scientology. The Church of Scientology has long had a controversial history on the Internet and had initiated campaigns to manipulate material and remove information critical of itself from the web. From ear...
Yeah. About that.
wikipedia links sources bro
Awfully wrong
Especially in topics related to Balkans
linking wikipedia as a source isnt acceptable
If a Serbian writes the Wikipedia article, they will blame us.
If we write the article we will blame them.
Very simple.
Idriz the reason you might think certain pages are awfully wrong might be because of your own bias; many people's biases clash on wikipedia creating some middle ground that can't really be disputed
Even more so, the more back in history you go for each country 
No? Look; The Balkan editing wars on wikipedia are mostly lead by the country that has the most tech savvy users. This isn't about bias
Solely because not the entire world speaks Albanian.
Balkan wikipedia is notorious for being biased towards who edits it
So if a Serbian edits the Albanian page well

Yes and everyone can edit it, including people from the balkans, which kinda evens things out
Least cursed Wikipedia section:
What's evened out?
The ratio of true to false?
It's definitely not if that's what you mean.
Which source is kore reliable than wikipedia then?
literal documents dating back to those times
Which also make up wikipedia?
no
The problem here is
wikipedia is adapted from those sources
You sent a wikipedia link
And said "there's your proof"
And your proof is nowhere to be found in there
Even if we assumed wikipedia is a valid source
You.. didn't link anything that backs you up
Your statement doesn't really proof me wrong, I already said my statement that Yugoslavia was a soviet puppet state is wrong, but we're talking about the accuracy of wikipedia rn
Burden of proof
I'm still not convinced these countries actually exist
found the flat earther
Nah, I just always think east of Germany is Russia, sometimes remembering there is something else in between but it isn't important 😛
Probably something to do with not getting textbooks that mentioned the collapse of the USSR until I was a teenager
Dang, you got me
This is the full theme-song ("Who Do You Think You Are Kidding, Mr Hitler?") for classic BBC comedy "Dad's Army" - there's an extra four lines about 2/3 of the way through that were never used in broadcast. Music and video taken from a hidden easter-egg on a DVD.
sino soviet split?
usually it was the smaller states that the USSR had a more heavy hand in, such as the eastern bloc.
Sometimes I wonder what the intention was
Text of tweet is not important, just the screenshot of the poll
Did they really think everybody was clicking the last option? Or at least the first?
I mean, kinda dumb, at least here in the UK, most of our towns have OTT one way restrictions and all that crap so driving around is often either going to the nearest parking lot and walking or just walking into town or jumping on the bus there
As it should be
Cars don't make much sense in cities
And nobody got enough space for that
@near glen and looking at the US, cars are used for just driving up the block to work
You guys gonna learn too sometime
I have to think about when I last used my car, think last friday
To visit a friend outside my city
Normally I use it every Sunday to go to my parents but since weather is so great rn I just used my bike instead
if you live and work in the city cars don't make sense in the US
but that's only a fraction of people
I think Putin is a president of world
I think the sky is yellow
Oh, is it opposite day today?
I assumed so
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2021/06/10/worker-shortage-raising-wages/?itid=mr_5 - in other words, the sky is blue, higher wages = more people willing to take your job
and mind you, $15 per hour is a compromise on the progressives' behalf - if the minimum wage had kept up with inflation/CPI, it'd be something like $22 per hour by now
And if you look at it from the productivity perspective? Over $40 per hour.
lol
it's very depended on location
it's horrible in some, great in others
which is why a state (idealy, town level but that would never happen) minimum wage is better econ policy
But Republicans blamed unemployment subsidies for a tight labor market, but if raising wages gets you a deluge of applicants, clearly you're not offering them enough money.
These people would like to get off unemployment, if they got a better wage.
^
thats what I fear might happen if i decide to take a job and get off unemployment, i would get paid far less
which is fair but to say the solution is raising the federal minimum wage so high is not the case
dont you kinda then have the government competing against itself for wages? gov sets unemployment, and gov sets high min wage
yeah kinda but still if you cannot live off of (a full time) minimum wage job that can be a problem
Disclaimer: Am employed. For now at least.
are you supposed to be able to live off of unemployment? or off of the minimum wage?
latter in an ideal world
unemployment should be a buffer between jobs
now in an ideal world
we have a public option for healthcare
to also help people without jobs too
and that also happens to be a more politically viable solution than something like a $15 or $22 min wage
I mean it's completely logical to conclude that if you're being paid for not working, companies will have to beat that in order to get you to be paid for working.
There needs to be a lot of changes in the way public spending operates, and to be honest, I think it should be more on a local level than at federal
Plus if these policies did work in the first place, why have states where they raised the minimum wage still suffer from income problems?
or why dont certain states operate public healthcare for all?
Even if a vaccine could cause this keys (usually) aren't magnetic
Lol that was a funny video

Do you think that its right for people to charge money for paper forks?, because its hours of work that the paper community did for free, but they are also making there own improvements apon the code and spending hours as well
forks are legal, as long as they follow the GPL
so they gotta give all buyers access to the code
and you as a buyer can redistribute said code then cause its GPL again
damn the iz*one breakup must've really hit him hard 😥
pls no shitposts
not exactly politics, but:
Simulations of the SARS-CoV-2 proteome that include over 0.1 s of aggregate data are reported. Spike opening was observed, revealing cryptic epitopes that differ between variants, explaining differential interactions with antibodies and receptors that determine pathogenicity. The cryptic pockets described provide new targets for antivirals and a...
without clicking, thats the praise for folding@home right?
yea
Bit late to the party but the best decision I ever made for my business was to pay the employees way more than the National average for the exact same job.
Employees were way happier, worked harder, showed up earlier/stayed later. All without being asked to do so. (Of course they got paid for the extra time, don’t worry)
Wish more companies realized this, as well as politicians, but we know they’ll just keep getting lobbied for decisions.
@fluid sonnet what field?
out of interest, what kinda business?
Aerospace
yeah, it would really depend on the field
yeah see, in stuff where you want experts, paying good is pretty much a requirement
pretty much retail is cutthroat as it is, and smaller companies continue to be pushed out due to higher wage increases
not sure the same is true for min payment jobs
Aerospace, but also small contractor. We did things like LineX (truck bed liners), and automotive as well. But that was rare.
a blanket minimum wage isnt the best thing, and besides, being in a state without its own minimum wage (following federal), companies still offer way above that
I havent seen places offering below $10/hr besides online positions.
I think I saw some online postings not too long ago that were fully remote. Company was in some blue state which a higher minimum wage but is hiring outside the state at a lower rate
That is something I noticed as well. Seattle/ LA are investing heavily in remote jobs. They pay the rate of their state, but the people don’t necessarily have to live there.
I think a massive shift in wages is occurring especially with the realization of remote work.
it would be nice if the literature on raising the minimum wage actually agreed with the idea that it would push out businesses/etc but sadly there's not much to actually evidence that it is the case
Buildings no longer really need to be used, so massive high rises can be loaned out or rented out to businesses who actually need the space.
Anyways, figured I’d give my .02 from experience. I know it’s situational, not everyone can do it the same way.
the data is more that it would more negatively affect workers, not businesses
the CBO did a huge study on this
fuck let me get the link
there
Some states have like stupid taxes which you need to pay if you're emplying people there
Pretty sure seattle was one of them, and they where threatening to extend it to remote work, iirc
The best part of the coof is that those companies which have for years been saying that they can't accomidate remote working where so fucking fast to spin it up when it was needed
Now, I get some roles are not all that suited for it, and so, some credits there, but, many companies spun up in these stupidly OTT priced places for various reasons, but, now that people can work from whereever and live with a MUCH lower cost of living with the same wage, many states are tryna hit back against it, but, I think many of them are kinda doomed
Ah yeah, I've seen that study before. I actually really like it because even with its most dramatic estimate it still reduces the amount of people on the poverty line, increases the income for millions of households and predicts a real impact on those below the poverty line, with a slight cost to those above it. But even with these estimates the study still admits that there is "considerably uncertainty" on the impact that it would have on employment as well as even admitting themselves that their results are uncertain. It's a good stab at it, but the study is just slightly too based on estimates when there are plenty of case studies out there that many, many other economists have actually studied and investigated, finding that raising the minimum wage is generally speaking a good idea with a good overall impact.
poverty isn't a good metric for minimum wage
you can aid that with more social services from the government (healthcare, etc)
also with poverty, I could argue that while the net change when increasing federal min wage is positive (as in more exit poverty), there is also an increase in people entering it
which idk how I feel about
was that mentioned in that study?
yeah
i think with conditions for 2027 $15 min wage there was a 500k entering poverty each year
which is why I tend to lean more towards providing social services since they can literally only move people out of poverty (generally speaking)
sure, as opposed to 1.25m leaving poverty - besides, that study is just estimates so i definitely prefer hard figures/observation/etc anyway
but yeah, i can't disagree that social care is a better way to drag people out of poverty
horror is that poverty metrics are fucking useless and figures for services and such are stupid
nevermind there are people who just dont help themselves
you can be easily classified as not being in poverty while struggling to afford bread
either contribute to the discussion or fuck off
Ya, in my opinion the way the government defines being in poverty doesn't work https://www.census.gov/topics/income-poverty/poverty/guidance/poverty-measures.html





