#politics
1 messages · Page 49 of 1
A major part of why we dropped the bombs was to see what they would do to a city
@foggy fern - true 😆
We had them, we wanted to use them, Japan gave us an excuse
And one of the best-guarded secrets of the Manhattan project was that we only had enough fuel for two bombs
nevermind the casualty rate may have been higher if we didnt nuke them and instead used an invasion force.
Well, the Brits you can't say so much about good faith, they destroyed way more residential building than commercial or even infrastructure
@dusky raft Yes, that was the military analysis given to truman
Huh what about all the tests before hand?
But the Brits also were way more emotionally invested into this war
Having lost battles against germany earlier
And after too
@near glen I know they had an early policy of targetting civilians, but did that continue on later as well?
the Japanese military brass werent so willing to give up even if they had to fight on their home island
^^^^^^^
My great-grandfather served in navy during WWII and those Japeease had a very militaristic honor code
I don't had the timeline in mind, they targeted residential buildings for demoralization
Europeans had been through so many wars we had a culture willing to surender
to be honest, considering the suicide planes and subs, it wouldnt be surprising if the Japanese did something similar to what we have seen in the middle east
@dusky raft :shudder:
My grandfather served in the war, got captured by the Brits and obducted to England
r/conservative is such a shithole. most of their reaction to this claudia conway stuff is that the daughter is "mentally unstable" as if that relates to the issue
His brother served on the east front, they found what they think is his body a couple Years back
or its somehow the dads fault
My grandfather was 16 at the time
incase you didnt see, kellyanne conway posted a picture of her 16 yr old daughter topless to twitter
https://old.reddit.com/r/Conservative/comments/l5gkvr/kellyanne_conway_accused_of_posting_topless_photo/ just look at these damn comments
wat
Grooooooos
Isn't that child pornography?
oh wait thats the 2nd one, https://old.reddit.com/r/Conservative/comments/l5f73c/kellyanne_conway_accused_of_posting_topless_photo/ has more
"One look at the daughter's comments makes it pretty clear that this isn't a kid in good mental health. Sad how the parents seem to have allowed their political conflict to boil over with their daughter."
That's amazing - I'm sorry about what your family and country has been through 😦
@near glen Here's an article on it I just found https://www.airforcemag.com/article/the-allied-rift-on-strategic-bombing/
The moment has come when the bombing of German cities simply for the sake of increasing the terror … should be reviewed.
- Winston Churchill
I mean I initially learned this on wikipedia
But Basically the bombings started out as "Revenge on the Germans" and "lets kill lots of innocent people to make Hitler want to stop fighting"
[I mean I'm kind of mocking the british view there]
Yeah that's i mean with the Brits were more emotionally invested
Yeah, they kind of leaned towards the "demoralize the enemy" philosophy at first.
And yeah It didn't seem like they were primarily motivated by military reasons 😦
But the americans went along with it
And eventually the realized "oh shit this wont work" (because hitler is a mad man and there was no democracy)
So they started primarily targeting factories and stuff (and actually giving a shit about the the laws of war and civilian lives)
Idk, sad times for the whole of humanity
I'm definitely not an expert but that's what I get from my Wikipedia + Military Tactitian Father
@near glen Yeah but now we've had basically 40 years of peace 🙂
So thats great!
goes Back to code
This is from the report on the bombings done in 1946:
There is little point in attempting precisely to impute Japan's unconditional surrender to any one of the numerous causes which jointly and cumulatively were responsible for Japan's disaster. The time lapse between military impotence and political acceptance of the inevitable might have been shorter had the political structure of Japan permitted a more rapid and decisive determination of national policies. Nevertheless, it seems clear that, even without the atomic bombing attacks, air supremacy over Japan could have exerted sufficient pressure to bring about unconditional surrender and obviate the need for invasion.
Based on a detailed investigation of all the facts, and supported by the testimony of the surviving Japanese leaders involved, it is the Survey's opinion that certainly prior to 31 December 1945, and in all probability prior to 1 November 1945, Japan would have surrendered even if the atomic bombs had not been dropped, even if Russia had not entered the war, and even if no invasion had been planned or contemplated.
The Japanese had, in fact, already sued for peace. The atomic bomb played no decisive part, from a purely military point of view, in the defeat of Japan.
— Fleet Admiral Chester W. Nimitz, Commander in Chief of the U.S. Pacific Fleet
Do we tho? Last I checked Erdogan was paying militias to invade artsakh
Idk what current wars are ongoing outside of that, africa is still as unstable as ever, so is the war in syria
The US has been at war basically non-stop since at least WW2
Technically we're not in a state of 'war'
Congress just gives "Authorizations for the Use of Force"
Also, i just looked into that conway shit. She basically posted child pornography (why does she even have those images?!) Of her own daughter, because she felt like her daughter was on her phone to often
Thats fucked up on so many levels
And the president has like unlimited power to do whatever he wants with the military
Vietnam was started by unilateral presidential action, with no congressional authorization
Her daughter thinks she had the photos for blackmail or something and then got hacked
Just taking and/or having the photos is child porn though
AnTiFa DiD iT!
According to /r/conservative her daughter or her husband did it
broke into her house, broke into her phone, broke into daughters phone, took screenshot, then uploaded to twitter
I mean that's not strictly impossible, just unlikely
And she deserves a trial by jury
But yeah - gross
TIL the Japanese believed the US had 100 bombs, could drop 3 a day, and had Tokyo and Kyoto as their next targets
Because they tortured a random captured pilot until he told them whatever would make them stop
Honestly, given the /r/publicfreakout of KAC freaking out at her daughter, like proper abuse style freaking out, this kind of thing doesn't surprise me
what does honestly surprise me is the level of dismissal going on in those comments, like the person suggesting the daughter did it to get points with the left.. like.. wat?
at that point they really are just slaves to ideology at that point and cannot be helped
Ppl need to be able to ignore the two idiotic sides and just look at what's actually happening: a mom trying to force her daughter to use her phone less by posting child porn of her. No matter where the mom stands politically, that's just wrong on so many levels
Man, the more and more I read up on r/wallstreetbets fucking over all the hedge funds that shorted game stop the funnier it gets
Turns out, these hedge funds shorted more shares of game stop than actually exist 😂
And then there's this
A hedge fund manager has reached out to me for consultation regarding them hiring a "Chief Meme Officer" in order to turn their portfolio company stonks into memes. DM me if interested. They are pro-WSB.
883
It's so funny, suddenly the wrong ppl manipulate the market and now it's a big deal
When the whole market was bullshit to begin with
Ppl asking for sec trading intervention on gamestop 😂
Because if a company that wallstreet shorts gets hyperd that's bad, but when a company like tesla that wallstreet likes gets hyped into oblivion it's not problem
Reddit threat saying "hey let's support gamestop" literal anarchists but a hedge funds manager going on tv saying company x is a short case and telling ppl to short it is just fine
Gamestop was up to 350 pre market, (double the closing price) and then the hedge fond announced on tv that they closed their short on gamestop (would loose them 10 billion, 80% of their assets) and now pre market price is down to 226 again
Closing was 150 which was up 100%
If it's true that they closed their position, they are basically bankrupt and 10 billion just moved from wallstreet into reddit
Kek they reached main media in germany
Hedge fund got an emergency investment of 2 billion to keep it alive
That was before today tho
Gme is still up 40% to 209 premarket
The bailout was Monday
Ron Johnson says we shouldn't convict Trump because we should put it all behind us
Apparently both citron research and melvin capital closed their shorts on Tuesday evening
But wallstreet bets says that still 130% of available stock of gme is shorted
People are trying to get it going with AMC theaters now too
Kind of seems like they've realized these stocks below $10 can be swung around just like Bitcoin can 😛
Yeah they just looked at low cap stock sorted by percentage of shorts
Gme opened 350 😂
Seems to be a normal way of doing it actually: https://www.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/comments/l64l2t/eli5_the_gamestop_stock_situation/gky67ik/
Just because it's normal doesn't mean it's sane
Also, RH and other sites are having server issues rn
And reddit is still holding it seems
I was going to go check on stuff I'm invested in (not GME 😦 ) but looks like Ally's investment stuff is down. (Or, at least, I can't view mine! )
Oh looks like sec halted trading
At fucking 269.69?
Amc too 😂
Oh gme just resumed
Looked at amc, they opened 400%
Wsb be like
The suits are trying to short gme to cover their losses and wsb keeps holding/buying into the dip
Wtf
It's so fun to watch
And it's still not over
Look at this fucking legend
Fucking 💎 👐
Hodl is strong with this one
He's literally set for life now because he memed wallstreet
well he has to sell it at some point to get that...
he already got a pay out of 14m
oh well nevermind he's set for life
lmao put that into something safe and he'll never have to work again
Now it's just the memes and a fuck you to wall street
He can just put it on a normal bank and be set for life most likely, lol
Buy a nice home and be done with it
well yea, but you can put it into safe stocks and you'll get more money than a bank would ever give you
50k in, 50+m out 😂
whack ass market manipulation
and they're upset 😄
no idea what that means
Gme is gamestop
Wallstreet did bet that gamestop stock will crash, reddit went yolo and brought gamestop stock, reddit won the bet big time
Wallstreet lost a few billions already
Some redditors became millionaires over night
And it's still going
Gme is up like 1000% from earlier this month
It's obviously a giant bubble but wallstreet is still shorting to cover their losses
So reddit is still holding
(shorting = betting against the stock)
Holding = buying and not selling, driving the stock up
(disclaimer: i know nothing about this shit, i just watched the big short)
I think there is a mis-conception that big corporations are suddenly for more regulations. Big corps are usually in favor of more regulation anyways, because they have the resources to comply w/the regs, whereas small/new businesses are stuck with trying to comply with them.
large companies have whole departments dedicated to regulatory compliance
so if, say, amazon can get the government to fight off competition for them, they are all for it
I think the same thing applies to Wall Street. They can comply w/new regulations, and are for them because it makes it harder for the small guys to compete
(this is one of the reasons a regulatory state is not a good thing)
I hope this incident spurs this realization in a lot of people.
If you want companies to have more control make it so there is more regulation and government over reach so that companies have more incentive to control the goverment.
This is why I think big government is cancerous in a capitalist environment.
it has proven itself to be sooo much better in other environments after all...
hell, even in a more encompassing socialist/communist country has the same problems, its just businesses are considered owned by the government
though you dont get competition since government owns everything
what regulation?
Wdym what regulation? There are tons of regulations surrounding Wall Street. Anyone remember Elon musk getting in trouble for it?
Jim Cramer (a well known financial host on CNBC) cannot buy a stock in the morning, then tell people on his show to buy that stock.
Also, looks like r/WallStreetBets is now a private subreddit, and the associated discord server has been banned. Discord says it doesn’t have anything to do with the current news story, but the timing is really kinda sus.
oh i assumed you meant some regulation wall street was now in favor of
but i think now you just meant in general
A market without regulations isn't very free either though, you end up with massive monopoly conglomerates and no control over them
We often end up with them anyway but at least there are some limits on them
If we followed the Sherman Anti-Trust Act as it was written instead of an interpretation of it the Supreme Court made up in the 60s (70s?) maybe we wouldn't have them at all
Well I don’t know the exact wording of the regulations that Wall Street wants now, but it’s safe to say it would make it harder for small-time investors. And that makes it easier for them.
Perhaps they didn’t think something like this specific thing would happen, but for regulations overall, big companies are usually in favor of them.
Regulations are cringe and so is trust busting. Standard Oil and Bell did nothing wrong
Like Amazon recently raised its company-wide minimum wage to $15 and is now lobbying the federal government for a $15 min wage
Why might Amazon want that? Well it makes it harder for competition to pay that wage
A federal minimum wage doesn’t make sense because labor costs are so drastically different between rural Nebraska and Silicon Valley
well the regulation wall street would want then is just make it so individuals can't do whatever it is they did today
if it was a regulation that was applied across the board they'd not be in favor of it
Yeah exactly. Make it harder for us, easier for them.
You can’t really “sell” a regulation JUST aimed at small time groups. It would be a blanket thing
sure you can, just say you're doing it for their protection
we don't want people making x mistake, so we're not going to allow you to do it anymore
you could sell this type of trading to people i'd say, by the knowledge i've gained today it seems to be an extremely risky form of investing
Well the mechanism for determining which group you are in would be some license or smth that big time groups would be able to get much easier. But yeah, my larger point is, big corps are in favor of regulation cause it makes it harder for competition. That’s still the case here.
There’s a ton of laws that say... no new moving companies in this area unless all the existing moving companies agree to let a new one start
(For stuff other than moving companies as well)
this whole GME thing is fantastic to watch
I bought some shares and its entertaining watching their values skyrocket
Also, I don’t think it’s 100% that what they did isn’t already illegal.
apparently WSB mods make the subreddit private to clean up posts on it from time to time, likely to avoid reddit bans
I don't know though
It’s entertaining now, but when it plummets, and then you are left with “suckers” who bought a bunch at $100 and now it’s back to $8. And they lose a ton of money
Cause it’s gonna go right back/
this is a unique situation I doubt we are gonna see firms short like this again
Like, this isn’t a permanent thing
i think it goes back
it'd probably go back to 4 dollars
but it will hit some insane value before then
just get out before the firms collapse under their own debt
i think the people in WSB want to wait until they drain more money out of the hedgeffund though
so as long as the WSB people don't sell they win because the people who bet on it going down eventually have to end their bet
or something i don't really know
that's just what i kinda gleamed from reading things today
they either call their losses and buy back now, or wait for the options to expire, and one other scenario I forgot
the next few Fridays are going to be juicy
apparently VW hit 7000 something when this happened to them in 2008
GME could do that and it'd be super funny if it did
i think people on wsb were saying if they hit 1,000 they'd bankrupt melvin?
I don't know what melvins situation is right now but they had to take out a huge loan
citron is another firm involved in these shorts
I can see GME likely hitting 1k, and it might soar way past that if reddit keeps squeezing these shorts
people have to buy and hold or it won't go up that high though
Lol it's hit canadian national news: "Reddit Causes Market Frenzy"
"stocks soar amid 'meme' trading"
btw it's already hard for a random person to do day trading
That is someone who buys then sells in the same day or buys and sells shorts
robinhood is one of the apps that lets you day trade right?
You have to have a certain margin staked to prove you're good for it and keep people from trying to gamble away their tiny little savings
Your account has to have $25,000 or more in it at the time of the trade
And they have to stay there for at least 2 days after doing the trades
Yeah robinhood is what everyone uses on /r/WSB
I think they have some scheme that lets you avoid the margin rules sometimes which is technically illegal if you use it but isn't the main point of the feature so they get away with allowing it
We are issuing this investor guidance to provide some basic information about day-trading margin requirements and to respond to a number of frequently asked questions that we have received. We also encourage you to read our Notice to Members and Federal Register notice about the rules.
This is DFV: https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/l6ekdz/gme_yolo_update_jan_27_2021_guess_i_need_102/
that is amazing
im going to wait till big banks come in or the federal government to halt everything
NBC Nightly News said they lost over $14 billion today
lol
I dont have any sympathy for them
well, biden might have been right, there is unity between the left and right, at least when it comes to wallstreet
That was just for today, their online article about it has some estimate for the whole month:
S3 Partners, a financial data company, said Wednesday that its analysis found that short sellers had lost $23.6 billion on GameStop this month.
This looks like a pretty good article, you can start from not knowing what shorts, gamestop, and reddit are and get up to speed
well from what ive heard, short selling itself isnt really horrible, as it puts bets on when a company fails. They are usually seen to as warning signs when one is set to fail. Its when short selling becomes predatory which is what we might be seeing
considering these hedgefunds just seem to continue pouring cash in
Short selling at these levels on company that is struggling to begin with is practically guaranteed to kill it off
yeah, these bankers are fucking determined even if they lose their cash
Apparently the kinds of loans a company can get change based on how well their stock is doing
Shorts drive the price down just by existing
They saw a company that appeared to be on the brink and decided pushing it over the edge was a good way to make a few bucks
yeah, thats the predatory in nature aspect part
Gotta admit it’s really something to see Wall Streeters with a long history of treating our economy as a casino complain about a message board of posters also treating the market as a casino
71429
522237
Sad thing is it sounds like if you do an analysis of GameStop you end up with a stock price estimate of like $60
They're actually pretty big in online sales
When all these people jumped on the stock it was at like $10
yeah, I just hope that it infuses cash into gamestop for them to change their business practice
because holy fuck, gamestop stores feel so fucking dated
They've been losing money for the last couple years but were on a trajectory to turn it around and even after the disaster of COVID on their retail locations the estimate is they'll be profitable again by 2023 still
I think they do need a rebranding of themselves. it might be difficult for them considering historically their target audience
While their core product/service, I feel like used games bring down the looks inside a store
That's from the middle of 2019
The investor noted that 90% of GameStop’s roughly 5,700 stores are free-cash-flow positive. He explained how during the previous video-game console cycle, its free-cash flow tumbled in the last year before rebounding smartly the following years. He thinks 2019 will be the bottom for this cycle.
Even with COVID he was right, the last estimate for their 2020 losses is way lower than they reported for 2019
He noted there may be mechanical selling by quant-oriented funds because of new lease accounting guidelines that went into effect earlier this year. The new guidelines drove GameStop’s leverage ratios higher, he says, while nothing has changed fundamentally.
Apparently in 2019 their cash on hand was more than all their outstanding debt too (and more than their market cap...)
I suspect the borrowing needed to get through 2019 and 2020 changed that though
I wonder if other companies are going to be affected by this movement
AMC is up like 800%, isn't it?
The theaters
All of the ones WSB are pushing go down after hours because normal people can't really do after hours trading
There were 4 of them WSB was trying to push, I swear I saw another was Blockbuster but I thought they didn't exist anymore
Apparently it's a penny stock now and was up 1400% at one point
TIL a stock can be valued at $0.00
AMC Theatres; Bed, Bath and Beyond; Eastman Kodak; and the liquidation company for Blockbuster as well as Nokia.
That has to be rounding from some less than 1 penny price
The rest of them seem to just be memes but the GameStop one did make some sense
It went from "don't let them kill this company" to "how can we fuck over hedge funds as much as possible?"
well, considering the past instances of what is going on now, this appears to be a steamroller, taking its time
maybe to ensure the maximum damage compared to a violent uproot?
@foggy fern litterally all im thinking right now is that wall street may be suffering from something like the 11foot8 bridge, continue to ignore the problem and shovel more money into it
////// Support us on Patreon at https://www.patreon.com/11foot8 \\\
In celebration of "canopener day" on 11/8 we're posting this video of the crashes since last November, after the bridge was raised. Despite the COVID lockdown the bridge still snagged 9 trucks or campers in the last 12 months. We hope you enjoy this compilation!
Wait so with that video, did they mess up the sign? Like I'm unsure what the "raising the bridge" has to do with that - because if anything raising would mean less crashes, not crashes from people who didn't realise it'd been raised
no, they raised the bridge to 12-4
but people being people
fucking ignore road signs
and the size of their vehicles
Ahh okay, so it was unrelated to the raising of the bridge then
Was just a bit confused as they seemed to make a big point of that at the start
no, its just people being utter idiots on the road, which isnt unusual
Ahh from what I can tell that channel is dedicated to that bridge specifically - so it was more of a "btw they raised it" for existing viewers
though, im shocked how penske hasnt done anything when it comes to their trucks and that bridge
considering a lot of their trucks have lost their roof over the years
lmao this one had a bad time, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aBLH8qvaIFg
Today the driver of this moving truck tried to beat the light at the 11foot8 bridge and smashed his truck right into the canopener. Two passengers were injured and had to be taken to the hospital. One of the passengers hit the windshield with his head and cracked the windshield. This was crash #125 since April 2008.
yeah, fucking amazing how wreaked some trucks can get
the nicer ones are what are considered can opened
This is the famous 11 foot 8 inch can opener bridge. This bridge has become famous due to all media coverage it gets from all the truck accidents it creates, it’s so famous it even has it’s own Youtube channel that has been running for nearly 10 years.
The bridge used to be known as the Norfolk Southern–Gregson Street Overpass, it has been rena...
Although seems an ambulance was called for it - which seems a bit odd as no one was injured?
Unless their truck was full of people
Idiots be idiots.
lot of truck rentals
I binged that channel a few years back
I love that they know the bridge is going to get hit so they put a bar in front of it so you wreck on that first
Never noticed before but I guess it makes sense, looks like all their tires blew out too
We have such a bridge here too
Dubbed idiot Bridge
If you drive thru there it's a fucking concert of blinking lights in all colors
Raising wasn't possible as it's one of the main railway lines into the city
Ah I remember wrong, it's not one bridge, but a collection of bridges
Ranging from 3.6m to 4m
They rebuild one of the 3.6m bridges, which was an arch bridge,which was the main problem, but another 3.6m bridge still stands and still causes collisions
Kek all pictures are hosted by our local press it seems and their website has dns issues rn 😂
jeez
It's double bad here because of the multiple bridge it's hard to get rid of trucks and the street below is one of the main entry ways into the inner city and always a traffic hell, without such an incident
I'm not sure if they actually raised that bridge either, they might have lowered the road
Lowering the road is hard cause you easily create a rain pool
And if you need to add drainage, that's extra expensive
It's so meh, all 3 majority news papers we have here are down rn, wtf
It's one for idiots, one for plebs, one for business man or smth
This is how this looks from above, it's a mess of roads and bridges and stuff
It's the northern main connection, but it also meets the west connection there, as it's infront of our central station
If I google Idiotenbrücke it says it's being demolished 😦
But I can't view the page due to a proxy error 😛
Did y’all just discover the can opener bridge?
What a great idea to install cameras to record all the trucks that get totaled by it. And the city has seemingly gone to such great lengths with big flashy signs.... but nope.
That's the news paper that's down rn yess ^^
But yes, the arch bridge has been demolished and rebuild, but there's another bridge in that complex that still gets trucks stuck
ah... PETA
what is speciesism?
there are all these comments on their tweet trying to claim that humans aren't the superior species... I don't understand that. We clearly aren't the best at everything, but that's not what superior species means.
We are only superior to carnivorous animals because we can stand up with two legs.
well... that and I can go grab a tank that'll deal with anything coming my way. If you want to compare species, you have to account for the output of their traits, like our intelligence which has led to the invention of, say a tank.
no, im just making fun of them
and the people trying to defend them in the comments
yes indeed
yeah thats a lovely detail of our area. theres so many warnings setup too and they still fucking hit it
a sign flashes at you if your gonna hit lol
Oh, live in the area?
I only know those are close to each other because Raleigh-Durham International Airport
Oh, and I guess The Research Triangle
as much as this GME stuff is entertaining, it is true that it's not what the stock market is supposed to be for.
a stock value should reflect a companies status, or potential status, not based on essentially a troll
Gme highlighs what hedge funds do all the time
Did... did they add a weed stock in there?
They did https://www.sndlgroup.com/
Sundial cannabis is cultivated for three reasons: Heal, Help and Play. We aren’t just building a new company; we are pioneering the new global cannabis industry.
not at this level, volatility level, and risk to retail investors
GME is blatantly being pumped and its only going to fuck over retail investors
and ofc ted cruz likes what AOC said
Cruz would be happy if trading is restricted to his class by taking down Robinhood
Where in reality robinhood is just trying to protect retail investors from making dogshit investing decisions
if they didn't delist $GME they risk having the SEC regulate them out of existence
The idea that what's happening is good is such a fucking braindead position being justified with the same "2 wrongs make a right" logic
I would say robinhood delisted gme cause citadel said so
im sure they've been in talks
but the SEC places some responsibility on places like Robinhood to self-regulate
the position of the SEC for the longest time is that Robinhood is a bad thing that leads to shit like this
If we learn anything from today/this month it's that the market can't be trusted to self regulate
a major part of their decision is almost certainly due to the optics it gives to the SEC
If we learn anything from today/this month it's that the market can't be trusted to self regulate
no, it's that professential morons on WSB don't give a fuck about long term consequences of their actions
they just want a quick profit
it's illegal for hedge funds to do the same thing WSB did
so yes
I'd say they care
the only reason WSB isn't legally responsible is because the law never thought retail investors would be this braindead
(the laws are tied to holding institutions accountable)
That wasn't my question
The question was if hedge funds care about long time consequences
And hedge funds do this shit all the time, just not in public so nobody cared
the SEC hates digital retail trading as it is
WSB is using these digital platforms
they pumped a stock almost 1000%
the SEC is closer than ever to banning digital platforms like robbinhood
Hedgefunds do not cause these problems
WSB is going to get their whole means of operation outlawed
saw that
they're not breaking any laws
no idea what people expect to get them for
they're operating 100% within T&S
Just because they are operating withing tos, doesn't mean it's lawful
Tos don't get approved by a judge, you can write literally anything in there
right but they're also following the law as well
users of Robinhood are not entitled to a stock
Their T&S explicitly gives them the permission to not execute user orders and the SEC laws governing them don't require them to entitle their users to executing all orders
With GameStop stock on 2021's craziest roller coaster ride (...yet), brokers, exchanges, and regulators across the country are all trying to figure out what, if anything, should be done about it.
But what happens when your entire business model is premised around facilitating retail investment? Of "democratizing" the market?
Ultra-popular...
love Hoeg Law
I like Legal Eagle as well, but this guy puts out like 3 videos a day sometimes
idk how he has that much time, but its nice
yeah he does a lot for yt stories
AOC's response to Ted Cruz: https://twitter.com/AOC/status/1354848253729234944
I am happy to work with Republicans on this issue where there’s common ground, but you almost had me murdered 3 weeks ago so you can sit this one out.
Happy to work w/ almost any other GOP that aren’t trying to get me killed.
In the meantime if you want to help, you can resign. https://t.co/4mVREbaqqm
33735
169515
well... that's overstating it a bit. I don't think ted cruz called for anyone to be murdered
but yay, unity
Unity doesn't mean there are no consequences for your actions
no no it doesn't
and the political process will take care of Ted Cruz
he didn't do anything illegal
i mean one's after robinhood because they want to limit trading to elites and one's after robinhood because they hate all aspects of capitalism
you decide which one's which!
lol. They have agreed before on more restrictions on lobbyists, but idk where they think that's gonna work, they were all in flagrant violation of 1st amendment
Eh, you can do something like that as a regular employer
I don't know if the government can do that though, they have more restrictions even as an employer
yeah, that's what im talking about, the government
In California no one can do that
do what exactly, I didn't mention any specific restrictions
so not sure what we are talking about
An employer in California can't enforce a contract that says you can't work for certain people or in certain industries after working for them
well the issue w/lobbyists is its just speech, and the gov can't restrict your speech regardless of what job you had before
If they didn't want you to work for someone else they should have made sure you didn't want to leave
well speech, and petitioning for a redress of grievances.
I don't think it works like you say for lobbyists though
that's what lobbying is, pushing an agenda
The act of petitioning the government is speech, being allowed to work for a company that does that is different
I was never talking about working for a company
They can't stop you from doing it but they can potentially stop you from making money from it
I was always talking specifically about lobbying
At least outside of California
No one is seriously suggesting a ban on petitioning the government
Just getting paid to do so on someone else's behalf
“If we can agree on a bill with no partisan snuck-in clauses, no poison pills, etc — just a straight, clean ban on members of Congress becoming paid lobbyists — then I’ll co-lead the bill with you,” Ocasio-Cortez tweeted at Cruz.
(emphasis mine)
I still think a service time might be the best idea to slow down the revolving door
limit 20-30 years in any elected government position and appointed position that isnt military.
hmm, apparently the stocks on this list are ones someone has been naked shorting
(search GME)
That's supposed to be a list of stocks that have been sold but not delivered
Sounds like the hedge fund that WSB was trying to fuck up has already closed their position though, yesterday
So it's just a bubble now, there is no reason to keep holding GME
yeah, I still think when it pops, you're gonna have a lot of people that saw the story, put money in, and then lost it.
because if people started selling it, it'd go way down. Its not possible for everyone who bought it to sell it, and it still have its high price at the end
nOOOoOOOO tHeY'rE sHoWiNg ThOSe hEdGE FunDs!!11!!
robinhood bad!!11
can literally not go tits up!111!
I still think most of the people until like a week ago were doing it to screw the hedge fund, planned to get out when it fell back to their buy in price, and were willing to take some loss for a cause
But it wouldn't have jumped so fast without a bunch of people piling on looking to make a quick buck
Instead those original folks will likely be the ones who make all the money while the hedge funds and late joiners go home broke
It was a gradual (but higher than it should be) rise from like September of last year until a week or two ago
Can you short the stock now?
Then it went in to orbit all of the sudden
Retail traders on any platform cannot short the stock right now, based on what people are reporting on twitter and such
Well, why can’t a fund just come in, short the stock now, and make a ton
They're also having trouble executing their options or whatever
That's probably what the fund that bailed out the first one is doing
That fund is also the one that processes trades for Robinhood
I just stopped using Robinhood like 2 weeks ago funnily enough.
If those two parts of the company coordinated that's illegal but if they aren't allowed to work together why are they allowed to be the same company?
I think they can do that tho.
They're doing a margin call or whatever, right?
You don't have enough margin for them to think you'll be good for it
they're allowed to do it
you give robinhood power to act on your behalf
no law on the books requires they need your permission
yeah we talked about this
nothing illegal going on
nothing will come of that law suit
Mhm just putting it here, can't really comment on it, not a lawer or into stocks just interested in the beef ig
i just saw this and lol'd https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EswU5V_W8AE2K2U?format=jpg&name=small
Rich People: “Why don’t poor people just buy stocks?”
Poor People: “Hmm, okay, let’s try”
Rich people: “Wait. Stop. We didn’t mean be successful at it”
:/
I saw a good version of this on Reddit
how come everyones using robinhood and not other brokers?
I think robinhood is just the easier to get started with? Only 2 weeks ago did I get my schwab acct setup
but man this is fucked up
you know shits bad when aoc and cruz are teaming up
i dont even know how to fucking access mine, i had a scottrade, then TD ameritrade bought it, but i havent used it in years
i think i even have money sitting in the shit
and i had a brokerage account, so i can short actually lol
It's not only robinhood anyways
Listening to irate New York hedge fund billionaire Leon Cooperman on CNBC right now lamenting people "sitting at home getting their checks from the government, trading their stocks."
“This fair share is a bullshit concept," he shouts. "It’s a way of attacking wealthy people."
6959
28565
fucking bullshit with these rich bastards
while nothing is fair, they claim its not fair when the working class get an advantage
yeah, see there are different kinds of billionaires, the ones that do this, make money and produce literally nothing.
and then you have the other ones that actually do smth
While I dont agree politically with silicon valley CEOs, at least they produce something
and becoming a billionaire by investing well, isn't a bad thing, look at Warren Buffet.
I think smart investing isnt a bad practice, its when one exploits the market to get rich by taking others down
its certain types of investing, buying companies, to sell their stuff, etc.
https://twitter.com/RobinhoodApp/status/712708069369782272
https://twitter.com/GameSpot/status/1354892849800638465
lol, look at berkshire hathaway's website https://www.berkshirehathaway.com/
designed 20 years ago
their Class A shares are at $348,220.00
When they have their annual shareholder meeting Omaha turns in to midtown Manhattan
yeah, its a big deal
(well except this year)
idk when it is during the year, did it beat COVID last year?
(midtown Manhattan is the most expensive place in NYC)
I believe it's during the summer
yeah, May 1. so it was virtual last year
Well that sucks https://twitter.com/MacFarlaneNews/status/1354871296664993795
build a wall (around shiny building)
Spotify has patented new technology that could listen to your speech to get data points like emotional state, gender, age, and accent to hone music recommendations https://t.co/e71xFA3FP7
243
617
More companies spying on you for data in the guise of better user experience yay
Unless that patent is specific to music recommendations a friend of mine works on software to do that already
I think theirs is meant for call centers or something
FUCK robbinghood
yes fuck robinhood! the company trying not to get regulated out existence by people making poor trading choices like you
but no its robinhoods fault!

And now I've been reminded of that dumb soy thing again
well if people are gonna keep staying stupid shit in this channel mine as well use stupid memes
Soy's destroying men. Please don't do any research and also buy my pills (note: contains soy)
My Twitter: https://twitter.com/hbomberguy
My Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/Hbomb
My Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/hbomberguy/
--SOURCES--
Analysis of 32 studies into soy protein effects on men's hormones (including testosterone) - http://www....
love hbomber
Blocking them from buying was a ridiculous move and complete bullshit.
no it wasn't
the SEC hates shit like robinhood in the first place
they're trying to save face from them by not letting dipshit morons buy shitty meme stock
saying it's a "ridiculous move" shows pure ignorance around what the core problem of whats happening right now
Does Robinhood have some exposure themselves?
If there’s any chance they would’ve had to pay a bunch of extra money, they would take steps to prevent that
The whole piling onto Robin Hood is really an excellent example of virtual mob mentality
The stock thing in the first place is ALSO an example of virtual mob mentality.
Yes, Robinhood had to take out lines of credit to cover their own margin requirements
yes its literally just market manipulation
It’s how the stock market is suppose to function, people buy stocks (usually because the company announced smth or had a good quarter or some info about the company) and the stock goes up. The purpose is not to “troll” hedge funds.
mhm
WSB is literally fucking themselves and are going to get retail trading banned
so gg i guess?
im just surprised by the shear number of morons thinking its actually Robinhood's fault
everybody and their dog are spewing this total dogshit
not surprised about AOC, her econ takes are always dogshit. but just everyone else
Also, a hedge fund isn’t just one guy right? It’s a group of investors who also lost money. Idk if anyone “normal” puts money into a hedge fund since they are riskier, they usually go for mutual funds.
correct, hedge funds are very high risk investment firms
Yeah, it's not like AOC has a bachelor's from Boston University in economics or anything
Oh wait...
Yeah, cause we all know degrees from a university mean you are good at smth. Trump has a Econ degree too.
She can't even understand the difference between legal and illegal though
Didn’t she want some registry of people who donated to trump?
that already exists, no?
Anyone associated etc
Yeah, it should already exist cause it’s public, but there was smth else
The point was to not let people pretend they never supported him after he was gone
Then she screwed herself by voting Pelosi without demanding something in return, now she's lost all her important committee positions
That happened a lot with Gingrich, Bush, etc
Once they were out of favor everyone piled on and pretended they disliked them all along
Yeah, I gotta feeling Pelosi is content to just ignore her
Well here is a classic example of her and Econ. A federal $15 min wage
AOC is on the same committees she was last session though?
$15 isn't bad
But for everywhere
polls very well with economists
$15 isn’t bad for some places
Financial Services and Oversight & Reform
is it ideal, no. but not horrible
(Cause all the economists live in CA, DC, or NY)
I'm pretty sure she was kicked out of the important ones
At least the ones the media talks to
Oversight and Reform Committee is like, the committee
She was tweeting today like she was on that committee
I don't see an official list for ORC
Oh, it's a naming thing
Yeah most committees have like 3 names
You're looking at a subcommittee of the Appropriations committee
I'm talking about https://financialservices.house.gov/about/committee-membership.htm
I’d be pretty opiates too if I weren’t able to buy
Ah yea you're right
Pissed not opiates wtf

if you're gonna keep coming back not willing to understand why its good you can't then stop coming back
Oh it's not that she was dumped from one, she wasn't added to one she was looking to get
Energy and Commerce Committee
Why is it a good thing they were prevented from buying?
the SEC hates shit like robinhood in the first place
they're trying to save face from them by not letting dipshit morons buy shitty meme stock
I don't like that Robinhood was forcing them to sell actual stocks
Why does the SEC hate robinhood?
Those were margin stocks
Forcing them to close put options is whatever, I think they call that a margin call
At least some of the people said it was their actual stocks
because SEC likes to regulate the retail market to avoid retail investors from making poor choices
How is it a poor choice?
robinhood loses a lot of that control for the SEC
Who determines that?
GSE is a super volatile stock
it's a SHIT choice to put money in
it's not worth anything close to its current value
I disagree, long term, yes
the stockmarket isn't made for this
Minimum wage effects on economics are heavily debated by economists. Historically it's been linked to inflation which is linked to unemployment, but not in all instances.
Wall Street won't refuse free money, they'll gladly take you for a ride
it's people abusing a bubble and its going to lead to people who don't know what they're doing losing money
SEC tries to stop you from blindly giving them your money
Looks like the people who were shorting GME were the ones losing money
which is probably 80% of the reasoning behind halting GME trading
GSE?
i mean GME
and the hedge funds already closed their short positions barty
But I've dumped everything as of yesterday
literally just a bubble
I don't plan on looking at it again either
you shouldn't
When did they close their positions?
today/late yesterday i forget
Where do you see that?
And if it were today, that’s awesome because the market was manipulated so they could.
yesterday
and market manipulation is bad
2 wrongs don't make a right
if you want to say hedge funds do it
There are other funds that are shorting it, and they have not closed their position as far as I know.
which they can't because it's literally illegal
melvin was the big one
short interest is about 50% now
probably little if any hedge funds make that up
50% is still pretty high but yeah, it was 150% before
Saying hedge funds “can’t manipulate it because it’s illegal” is a bit of stretch when that’s basically part of their job. I don’t really agree with anyone who defends Wall Street or disagrees with people banding together to try to use the same tactics against them. If the SEC had halted all trades on GME, I think people would have been fine with it. But the fact that Robinhood shut off the buy power of people who were primarily trying to buy the stock, and allowing the rest of the big traders to manipulate the stock to bring it super low to cover their position is sickening. I definitely hope something comes of this, but am not hopeful because very few people were ever charged in the crash of 2008, so expectations of fuckery like this being stopped or held accountable is at as low as it gets.
I think something very differently would have happened today if the Robinhood traders were able to buy.
I watched an interview of the CEO of Robinhood and he was a complete jackass.
so two things happened that you're fundamentally not understanding
- Robinhood's clearing house was saying they were about to meet their load and couldn't keep up with the opening positions
- The SEC already hates Robinhood for making unsafe positions easier to get. Them blocking this was good in the eyes of the SEC, and good for the people who use Robinhood so people can still use their platform (don't get regulated out of existence)
is that still 50% more shares than exist of GME?
and Hedge Funds do not Pump and Dump stocks
Robinhoods CEO denied 1.
I watched him say it, so yes, he did.
clearing house != hedge fund
I know what I heard. He was specifically asked about that and denied it.
link it
I’m not going to do that. You can find it through a simple google I am sure.
their clearing house couldn't handle the influx of opening positions and Robinhood was running low on capital
He denied that.
link it
He was asked why they got more credit yesterday and he said that they would not have any issues, and that was not the reason behind the freeze on buying.
credit != clearing house
He specifically denied running low on capital.
they posted in their blog post today they were
[a]mid this week’s extraordinary circumstances in the market, we made a tough decision today to temporarily limit buying for certain securities. As a brokerage firm, we have many financial requirements, including SEC net capital obligations and clearinghouse deposits. Some of these requirements fluctuate based on volatility in the markets and can be substantial in the current environment. These requirements exist to protect investors and the markets and we take our responsibilities to comply with them seriously, including through the measures we have taken today.
why not block selling then too lol selling just ends up benefiting the hedge funds?
because forcing someone into a security is a bad idea
right makes sense
how is that not the onion
yeah, you guys don't know about the Jewish space laser? 😆
The South African variant has 2 confirmed cases in the US now and the people who had it haven't had any international travel recently
Luckily all the variants so far should be trivial to modify the vaccines for and they should sail right through testing and approval using the same systems used for flu variants
moderna said their vaccine works on the south african one
But that might mean you need to get vaccinated again
They said it was less effective though I'm not sure if they gave a number
Moderna, that is
And here is BioNTech (Pfizer):
Dr. Ugur Sahin, the chief executive of BioNTech, said in an interview on Monday that his company was talking to regulators around the world about what types of clinical trials and safety reviews would be required to authorize a new version of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine that would be better able to head off the variant in South Africa.
That Robinhood lawsuit seems to have been done by a professional and is throwing every possible thing at the wall to see what sticks
I figured it was just some random upset redditor who found a template
No bunch of lawyers were searching for users to file lawsuits too
laywers are always looking for plantiffs. gotta make that crazy 💰
They restricted their accounts to 1 share
Earlier was 5 shares, they’re still trying to do it to them
Hopefully people are moving off their platform
I cant help but draw a comparison between all the people saying "wow, the free market was exposed as not free", and "twitter can ban who they want, its a private company"
I think it’s very different
the government isn't stopping you from buying GME shares
and you still can, there are other platforms that still let you trade shares
Can you? I thought they were all blocking or delaying trades of GME and GME options
ok, well you certainly cannot blame robinhood for the fall of game stop stock, when its rise was totally unnatural in the first place.
Absolutely can
At least one of them was either blocking or having issues handling selling put options too
robinhood locked it down to only selling and either did a bunch of margin calls or forced the sale of actual stocks depending on who you believe
What happens when the people buying to drive the price up suddenly aren’t allowed to do that anymore?
there are other places to buy the stock, is the thing.
That’s ridiculous
if multiple companies got together and colluded to prevent buying of a stock, that's illegal
“You can use that other broker that takes 3 days to set up an account and transfer your money to!”
well ok, but that's not robinhoods fault
Saying that robinhoods decision didn’t have any effect on the market is a JOKE.
when I said "blame", I mean it with the negative connotation, like "fault", not the connotation-less meaning like "cause"
What I'm getting from that chart is the SEC should investigate if Elon Musk has done any trading in GME 😉
their actions, as all actions, affect the market.
the stock wouldn't have fallen, if it hadn't gone up (sharply) in the first place, causing all the uncertainty leading to all this
It was a pretty steady rise until this last week then it started looking like bitcoin
It went up sharply because people want to cause a short squeeze and make money, to fuck the funds that have tried to RKO GameStop
It’s their fault for getting caught like that, it’s the market correcting their risky position
yeah, and the stock going down is still their fault. for participating in a volatile market
(on a quick side note) https://twitter.com/TheRealOJ32/status/1355243085186256897?s=20
yeah, always read the comments of OJ tweets
Their decision caused a lot of damage and hopefully it doesn’t matter and these shorted stocks get squeezed to hell
holy shit here we go again
the lawsuit filed is filled with the same BS the epic lawsuit is, a bunch of claims of entitlement to things not actually entitled to
exactly, retail trading isn't a free market. I have no idea where this is coming from. Retail trading is one of the most heavily regulated markets in the United States, so this who "
so much for the free market" position just reeks of people who just learned about the stock market this week
you still could, a number of different trading sites let you buy GME
I didn't make any argument about the validity of any of the claims, I was just surprised as how wide ranging they were
It wasn't just "you blocked me, you bad" it was like 40 things
no you can't, gamestop is overvalued, robinhood running out of liquidity isn't their fault
this isn't robinhood's fault
Lmao
this proves nothing, you and other people are creating some giant fucking conspiracy
occam's razor applies here
what's more likely: they ran out of liquidity that they are legally required to maintain during the biggest surge of stock purchases ever
I still can't believe a market maker is allowed to be the same company doing trades and options
GME CEO yesterday says it was not caused by a liquidity issue, gets a cash infusion of 1 billion overnight, then happens to keep implementing restrictions.
OR some big evil company blocked it
But that's a whole different thing
barty what in the living fuck are you talking about
GAMESTOP FOR
this is a ROBINHOOD issue
ROBINHOOD could not maintain enough capital to back the trade orders they were getting
Robinhood and/or their market maker who is also the company that bailed out the hedge fund that got squeezed
they HAD to stop to maintain in compliance with the SEC
But but but the ceo said that's not the case!!!!1111
Which is why people are suspicious about it
their CEO is lying in that case
they literally fucking said in their blog post it was a capital issue
Their ceo is full of shit i agree 😂
Yes I mistakenly said GME instead of RH, sorry.
regardless he's contradicting his blogpost
and regardless of that even if it was for the safety of retail investors it's totally understandable
this is literally a ponzi scheme at this point
TIL there is a 10th Circuit ruling that women are allowed to be topless in all situations where men are
the short positions of the big firms have closed
The city decided not to appeal to the Supreme Court so we don't have a nationwide ruling on it
the only people losing are going to be the poor fucking dipshits who saw this on WSB and didn't know any better
legal eagle? :D
Sometimes the law taketh, sometimes the law giveth. Unfortunately.
🚀 For a LIMITED TIME get CuriosityStream AND Nebula for 41% OFF! https://legaleagle.link/curiositystream
GOT A VIDEO IDEA? TELL ME!
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Send me an email: devin@legaleagle.show
MY COURSES
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Interested in LAW SCHOOL? Get my guide ...
😄
Total shorted shares has not changed much according to S3 Partners.
Oh I've heard the murder in Yellowstone one before
GME shorted shares according to them are only down 5 million this week. Around 58 million left.
Melvin Capital, the company people were trying to fuck over, already closed their short position
Most of the 5 million that were closed were done yesterday, due to the drop in price.
the current short interest is people likely understanding that stock can't see high forever
Well not due to, but coinciding with.
they closed their position Wednesday
so right now WSB is sticking it to nobody
you're not screwing over any big guy
it's pure degeneracy
Who owns those 58 million shorts then? No one?
new ventures
that WSB spewed up
A little here, a little there, etc
Probably mostly various funds but not one big position like it was before
Why are the borrow fees still increasing then? If the amount of lendable shares supposedly had increased due to their positions being closed.
When a team of Oregon health-care workers stuck in traffic during a snowstorm was running out of time to administer leftover doses of the Moderna vaccine, one local public health official had an idea: Vaccinate strangers in the middle of the highway.
just so we're on the same page what fees on what platform are you talking about @small root
That has to be the craziest way someone gets this vaccine
Getting the information from https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2021/01/29/gamestop-short-sellers-are-still-not-surrendering-despite-nearly-20-billion-in-losses-this-year.html and https://twitter.com/ihors3/status/1355194252674953219?s=21 (S3 director of predictive analytics)
"In actuality the data shows that total net shares shorted hasn't moved all that much," Ihor Dusaniwsky of S3 Partners said.
$GME short interest is $11.20B; 57.83M shares shorted; 113.31% of Float; 53.12% S3 SI% Flt; 29% fee & easing. Shares shorted down -5.08M shares, worth $983 million, -8.07%, last week. Shorts down -$19.75B in 2021 mark-to-market losses; down -$7.83B on today's +70% move.
293
1101
in that case it's probably because nobody want to be in the business of short selling that stock unless you got big money as collateral
they can do whatever the hell they want to crypto just stay the fuck out of securities
72% is still pretty good since it only takes one shot and didn't require LN2 storage but that 57% is worrying
Although they say no one who got the vaccine had to be hospitalized or died even if they got sick
It's also much easier to make so we'll probably all have had that one by summer
Seeing the two starships next to each other is pretty sweet.
Morning all. We've had contact from Google confirming that the suspension is due to abusive content somewhere on Matrix; we're working with them to explain how Element works and get the situation resolved.
360
Huh, apparently Guiliani tried to blame The Lincoln Project for the coup attempt so now they're suing him, his client (Trump), and Bannon (it was said on his show)
yeah, all these defamation suits probably won't go anywhere, on any side. its exceedingly difficult to prove
you have to have knowingly said false information with the intent to "defame", and its really hard to prove what you were thinking when you did something
cause only you can testify to what you were thinking
and you can just plead the fifth for that
and that's pretty much it
At the same time these are the sort of people who I could easily see leaving paper trails coordinating defamation up to and including literally writing "we are going to defame them"
What do you think about Interactive Brokers refusing to enable trading on GME until it goes back down to $17?
That's kinda weird, don't know what their trading volume looks like or if its a liquidity issue like Robinhood's
makes sense from a retail trading perspective but they look a lot more corporate so that moves seems strange coming from them
The chairman is just a jackass I think. He said he wouldn’t let people buy it until it goes back to what it actually is worth.
A lot of those brokers were told by their clearing houses to do it. Some have disclosed that, some have named them, some have been really shady about it. But yeah
There’s a video of him saying it one sec, guy is just an asshole haha
Believe it’s this, he said that it was protect their company and clearing house, which makes sense, but the $17 comment kinda makes me mad. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2021/01/28/interactive-brokers-restricted-gamestop-trading-to-protect-the-market-says-chairman-peterffy.html
well at least in robinhood's case their clearing house lacked the liquitiy to back trades so maybe that was the problem?
the but $17 thing is strange
i understand it because it is very overvalued obv
Yeah, I was just mad about the robinhood CEO lying about that
well from what i understand he just didn't want to go on TV saying "we have a liquidiy issue" because it sounds bad
The chairman of that is upset about the manipulation of the GME stock and how it’s “illegal”
So maybe that’s why
(Too)
i doubt what WSB was illegal
Agreed
well what most of them did
since they're not an institution they're nothing to really hold them to
But I don’t claim to know a ton about the laws that regulate the stock market
SEC didn't think a bunch morons on an internet site would do this shit 😄
Yup haha
now i do suspect the SEC is going to do shit to make sure this doesn't happen again
Naked shorts shouldn’t be legal in my opinion
which I think could also be what interactive is trying to look good against
No naked shorting happened
it's already illegal
Then I’m mistaken on what those are
Naked shorts is when you short something without the """assets""" to back it up
I thought it’s when you short a stock but don’t actually borrow the stock, which is why there are more shorts than stock
it's partly that
Ah ok
its that + when you have no collateral
Yeah that makes sense
some of that happened in 2007/2008
which is how it got outlawed
but short interest gets over 100% when people short the same individual security with the collateral over it
Kk
it's hard to put into words
I get what you mean
but generally healthy
Man I just want to see the big guy get annihilated so bad haha
Really hope it happens
i mean the big guy is already gone
they lost their billion
all that's left are the little guys blowing their sail ship further into the ocean
We will see
i mean the hedge fund already closed their short positions
idk who you'd be screwing over 😄
that is a spicy statement
NYSE keeps track of stocks that appear to have naked shorts
iirc it's tracking trades that have happened but no stock has been transferred yet
GME was on that list
Usually that just happens as things are syncing back up and it didn't "really" happen but GME was on there for a while
congrats reddit!
you made a company $100M
you did it!
I’m waiting for some more people/corps to make a ton of money. Like what if Don Jr, made like $50 million off of this?
Or smth like that. 😛
Wow the increased volatility of GME forced brokers to up their deposits from $26 billion to $33.5 billion in one day
So yeah, all of the confusion was because Robinhood didn't want to come out and say "we don't have enough money for this"
Oh, and Robinhood's "instant bank transfer" is just them letting you buy stuff on margin until the funds clear a day or two later
So them forcing people to sell what appeared to them to be actual owned stock makes sense under that system
If you wired RH $10,000 and bought GME 5 minutes later RH was letting you buy it on margin
Oh, and apparently when you buy $10,000 in stock they can't use your money to cover the clearing house deposit, they have to have their own money to cover that for the 2 days it takes for the trade to clear
So the deposit requirements went up, everyone was buying, and they ran out of money
The reason Robinhood allows you to start trading right away while others make you wait a few days is RH accounts are all margin accounts
They give new accounts up to $2k (iirc) of leverage (pending bank transfer) so they can trade right away
since bank transfers aren't instant
but the clearing house needs collateral anyway so it wouldn't have mattered
Right, even if you had $10k sitting in your RH account for a month first they couldn't use that money for collateral
And DTCC required GME trades put up 100% collateral vs 3% before that
Illegal naked shorting and stock manipulation are two of Wall Street's deep, dark secrets. This report explains what they are and the magnitude of the problem they represent.
There was no naked shorting going on if that's what you're trying to say
So Republicans bring out 10 Senators (exactly enough for a filibuster-proof majority) pitching their idea for another relief bill that is like 1/4 what Biden proposed
Seems like the goal is to tempt Democrats in to taking them seriously and trying to negotiate back up from there just so they can stall and then back out while blaming the Democrats but being unwilling to compromise
Obvious counter-offer should be 4x the proposal.
Like, I don't think this could be considered a serious proposal but having 60 votes on board is a tempting goal
Remember when Democrats spent most of the session where they had the majority in both houses trying to negotiate ACA with Republicans then none of them voted for it anyway?
And because they spent so much time trying to get bipartisan support for ACA not much else got done?
I mean, the most critical piece dropped from the ACA happened because of an independent but still
This is a certain type of uncomfortable funny.
"Oh. Oh no."
Worth noting that they also count anti Israel as anti-semitic
Which I will never understand
But yes, racism in generally is getting worse, so racism against jews too
That's what happens if you tolerate right wing extremists in a parliment
Who always say shit like "Hitler and the nazis were nothing more but a fly shit in thousand years of german history"
(is "fly shit" a thing in english? We use it to say that something is extremely insignificant)
i've never heard it used
I've only heard it used when a book is trying to be authentic eastern european
thats interesting that being anti israel is also anti semitic
Why is it strange.. the population of Israel is like 85% Jewish.
Also yeah I sold my GME stock that I'd been holding about 1 day before it started to fall.
There's a big difference between being against the actions of a government and being against a race or culture, even if a majority of people ruled by a government could be categorized as part of one group.
Yeah but that's not what was stated as anti-semitic.
Sorry, I assumed you were replying to the most recent comment above yours about it.
I was, he said Israel, not the Israeli government.
There is also a distinction between those two, one is a nation of people, the other is the people who run that nation.
Well that makes sense.
If I say Israel is breaking international law by invading palestine I get called Antisemit
Just because there are people of a certain identity running a government does not mean they either represent that group, or criticism of that government is a criticism of that group.
At the end of the day they're politicians, most of which are not very nice people.
We saw similar claims of racism when people criticized Obama's actions and policies, that's just as insane without further evidence.
context and looking for hatrid
Yeah, that's pretty much the modus operandi of the news lately.
Did we? I saw that when it was stuff like the "muslim" "kenyan" and such
if you leave anything open for interpretation, people looking for hatred will look for the potential slant to throw it as evil
There were instances like you suggest, I think people latched onto that though. Several news outlets and specific individuals claimed criticism of Obama was racist when there was not any additional evidence.
I mean it's possible it was closet racist, but without evidence it's a very spurious claim.
Have any sources further to the right than huffpo handy? (I understand it has been a while and you may not)
I try really hard to diversify my discrimination against all religions, calling me a anti-semitic because of my political views towards israel is an insult to that
Same for claiming people against the Israeli governments actions are anti-semetic.
Like it could be motivated by that, but without additional evidence it's highly spurious again.
All religions are equally dum and I treat them fairly, they all get their fair share of shit from me 😂
This is how political correctness evolves.
Yeah people are free to practice their religion as they please as far as I am concerned provided that practice doesn't directly harm others.
But I agree totally regarding your opinion of the actions and policies of a government does not equate to identity hatred.
In fact saying you think a specific religion has a negative effect is not the same as saying you hate people of that religion either.
Well, I said that because you can disagree with the existence and circumstances of the existence of Israel as a country but not be critical or against people who are Jewish.
Yeah, of course. You can even be critical of the religion itself and it's not anti-semitic realistically.
Mhm
the Israel/Palestine conflict is very complicated, and I dont think its one or the other at total fault.
both sides along with their neighbors are to blame for the current situation, along with the british who split up the region
All religion has a negative effect 😛
It trains you to believe shit without evidence
Yeah, and saying that isn't anti-semitic. 😛
People want something to believe in is the actual issue, similar issues occur in the scientific community just in differing ways.
Religion has been used as a catchall for quite a few things, mainly as to fill in the gaps of what we dont know, power structure (depends on religion), and how someone is to go on with their life. It's meant to fulfill empty spots in a person. This is also why religion has been used to exploit people in the past for power.
Which is why I do tie in atheism as a religion, as its a belief of a lack of god and that science is gospel.
I also view atheism as a precursor as a way for the state to inject itself in the same area religion took up if abused.
I mean, personally I dont see much difference between blindly following a textbook in school that is heavily biased based on which country, state, city, or even school you're learning from.
^ view my third statement.
hm?
I also view atheism as a precursor as a way for the state to inject itself in the same area religion took up if abused.
sorry, not following
A lot of communist states went that route.
Wiping out identities and religions
China has been well in that process for a long time
north korea does it. and I believe the USSR did limited wiping of cultures to make the state more powerful.
I never said..
im confused
why are you telling me this?
I mean I agree, that's atrocious, but what does that have to do with anything I said lol
I should have added in, if a state were to inject more of itself into life, it will replace belief systems if needed.
wdym, literally anything can replace belief systems if needed
you can shove as much books and propaganda into someone's face, but you dont control them unless you have control of what they think
Countries very much so have control over what you think
whether you accept it or not lol
Last I checked, mind control hadn’t been invented yet.
Have you heard of psychology?
It's not really mind control
if you spend your whole life learning that the USA is bad and all the material to say otherwise was thrown into a fire pit, what's your belief going to be?
If a country is controlling what you see, then yes, it influence what you think.
exactly
Which is why a monopoly on education, is the WORST monopoly of all
influence ≠ conmtrol
unfortunate for the US public school system, and the rise of private schooling