#politics
1 messages · Page 48 of 1
inauguration is right now
» Subscribe to NowThis: http://go.nowth.is/News_Subscribe
» Sign up for our newsletter KnowThis to get the biggest stories of the day delivered straight to your inbox: https://go.nowth.is/KnowThis
#Politics #News #NowThis
Connect with NowThis
» Like us on Facebook: http://go.nowth.is/News_Facebook
» Tweet us on Twitter: http://go.nowth.is/News...
swearing in ceremony is at 8:15 PST or 11:15 EST
pence went, rub that in trump
mf manchild is probably playing golf and pretending he's still relevant
New president time
Hey, A-Rod is there
I am so ready right now
No trump is having some kind of celebration of his own
Apparently his wife is singing or something
At the same time window
Someone explain what the fuck a QAnon is
and they think 1000s of pedophiles will be arrested at the inauguration and Trump will again take office as dictator
oh lord.
Just read the wikipedia page's first paragraph, it explains better than most ppl can
ddg! qanon wikipedia
See also:
um
I have to go to the dentist for a checkup and I didn’t realize it was gonna overlap with this stuff I want to watch
FeelsBadMan
Wait is this happening now?
I almost had a meeting overlap with this today 😛
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QAnon
more or less, conspiracy that a cabal of satan worshipping pedophiles has infiltrated the government and donald trump is fighting said cabal along with Q, a "high-level government agent"
QAnon () is a disproven and discredited far-right conspiracy theory alleging that a cabal of Satan-worshipping cannibalistic pedophiles is running a global child sex-trafficking ring and plotting against U.S. president Donald Trump, who is fighting the cabal. U.S. prosecutors have called it "a group commonly referred to as a cult".QAnon also com...
who posted on 4chan lol
and all the trumpsters believe it ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Lol
Official inauguration time is in 5 minutes, iirc
Shit i have a meeting at 12
sounds like a joke, but it is not
"bit before noon"
should be here in the next few mins
harris just arrived
you should be able to see the start of it, at least
yeah that's "The Storm"
from QAnon
they think at the inauguration right after Biden arrives, the military will swoop in and arrest everybody

yea, pretty much, just like the dude who keeps predicting the end of the world
"it'll be in 2012"
"oh no wait, miscalc sorry
"
"2016"
"oh no wait ..."
INAUGURATION FUN FACT: Biden's inauguration marks the first time in four years that a President has appeared with a Bible in public without the aid of tear gas
2617
21827
Don't forget, today is the day we stop talking about the cameo person from home alone 2
aoc going to post a tweet saying "he gone" and pull 3M likes 😂
INAUGURATION FUN FACT: The President does not receive the White House Wi-Fi password until the oath of office is completed
this is unacceptable.
we must change this policy.
Biden arrived 
HERE WE GO
Apparently that's a big problem this time, they don't get to start moving shit in until noon and normally there is a parade and lunch with Congress to give the movers time
I thought they were already in process bc trump just up and left to florida around 7-8am
I think Trump would have to invite them in and as of last night he had not done so
oof
lol
I really don't get how people can be....so brainwashed
it's literally another 4chan bamboozle
and they got the entire republican party this time
Madam Vice President Elect 🥺
I think that space force flag does look pretty cool
yes that was one good contribution, we did need a new branch
Starfleet logo was just ripping off the Mercury program anyway, iirc
According to an article on Star Trek's website, the Starfleet emblem is "a direct descendant of the vector component of the old NASA (and later UESPA) logos." The design also resembles a golden pin awarded to NASA astronauts in the 1960s, per the article.
but meh
still looks sexy
oh did I miss it?
well then im prob wrong, I just thought smth was off and figured it was that
did you see the marine captain giving it, or did they cut or something?
WAIT YAY OMG
lets see if they do the "So help me God" bit
Why wouldn't they? These two are Christians
they did indeed
apparently the first 26 presidents didnt, and they were all probably more religious simply because they existed back in da day
pfft, I know the first few were definitely less religious
I totally thought GW started the so help me god thing
cause that's at the end of quite a few oaths
But in general even as we trend down on church attendance and people who say they believe people are more likely to attend church now than when the country was founded
Most of that shit started after WW2 to show we aren't like the godless commies
well wait, 26 presidents didnt, that's still before WW2 right?
yeah, theodore was 26
so wilson was first?
but what if we are godless commies
Of course a baby picks that time to start crying
Fucking babies, what are they good for?
Family bible, like 130 years old
President Biden <3
wikipedia updated?
I'm confused
literally .5s after he finished yes
Inauguration is already happening, but it's not 12 EST yet?
they said "just before 12 EST"
bleh
I missed it
The president of the United States (POTUS) is the head of state and head of government of the United States of America. The president directs the executive branch of the federal government and is the commander-in-chief of the United States Armed Forces.
The power of the presidency has grown substantially since its formation, as has the power of ...
kek
Let's get it trending, reposting...
I'm happy for the US
Those were a very dark 4 years
wtf lol, they let Kamala Harris's stay i think
nope they reverted both yikes
HUH
ok they wanna wait
two minutes
ok, whatever
heh
well shes sworn in is why
so is biden
yea, but wikipedia wants to wait exactly until noon
refresh again
they just changed
ye
now it is 12 noon and now "officially" biden and harris terms begin
cant believe they didnt prelock that before hand lol
kinda same, i was surprised
Wikipedia be like I am speed https://unreal.codes/2021/1/20/ZEJ3R1611162043887-chrome_ou1lTM4AMp.png
So how did Kamala get her VP account so much sooner than Biden got his POTUS?
"VP account"?
congratulations
now I can unblock @POTUS and @VP
you dont have it blocked, they rename accounts
hello 46th President of the US
Well maybe not
the old potus is renamed to something else, bidens new one is renamed POTUS https://twitter.com/POTUS
I see posts now on that acc
Oh, yea, just noticed that
They make a new account and wait until the presidency and then rename it
the post was worded in future context
it looks like the old one just got named to POTUS45
biden's was likely POTUS46, then renamed POTUS
typical CNN... its supposed to be "an historic"
No?
thats a brit thing
Yeah
ah good
why would you use an there
POTUS45 remained blocked, good
That's proper in the US
brits pronounce historic as 'istoric' and so an sounds better
wat
but muricans say the full H sound, so a
thats probably an oversimplification but oh well
Oldest President of America
is that a good thing? or just a thing?
huh
the oldest president
lol #NotMyPresident is trending

this is hilarious https://twitter.com/al_exis_e/status/1351937838456061954
Live footage of maga trumpets tweeting #NotMyPresident from their trucks
https://t.co/WOM4YBWB3Z
ok this is what the accounts become what https://twitter.com/jaketapper/status/1351939497014030342
Twitter news:
@Transition46 has become @WhiteHouse
@PresElectBiden has become @POTUS
@SenKamalaHarris has become @VP
@FLOTUSBiden has become @FLOTUS
@PressSecPsaki has become @PressSec
A new account, @SecondGentleman, is also live.
that because her account was moved
ahh
so she kept them all
I love that actually
I feel like this is a yes, but, this would be the first time in history the US has ever had a "Second Gentleman"?
yes
<3
I kinda wonder though
If Twitter has this stuff automated, or if someone manually moved/renamed accounts
definitely ^
Eyyy
Some good stuff there
space force flag
I laughed at that also
stock market goes up 250 points immediately following biden's inauguration lool
is that a small amount?
my stocks are about where they were yesterday
im up 2.5% but that's not anything crazy or smth
if you are looking that the Dow for an accurate depiction of the stock market, its not that great of an estimate. S&P 500 is better
the general rule with the stock market is, it goes up slowly, down quickly, but generally, it always goes up
Yay fuck Trump
yeah I converted some of my savings to stocks as it seems superior
Pretty amazing how easy it is to undo damage when it was done mostly through executive orders
well compared to interest rates.... yes, the stock market is way better
s&p 500 and nasdaq both hit record intraday highs between tuesday and wednesday
Savings accounts usually don’t even surprise inflation
they have always been hitting record highs, which is very strange
Surpass
they have been hitting record highs throughout trump's presidency pre-covid
it got back to its pre-covid high in august of last year, well before the election
Idk someone tell XOM to get their shit together
Gain/loss from when I bought it
I can’t complain too much their dividends are at 7-8%
yeah its a nice and powerful tool the president has
Yes but not as long lasting as actual legislation
its really kinda stupid how so much is done through executive order...
Executive orders are really dangerous and anti democratic
laws are supposed to be passed by the legislature
the EO has become so overused
In germany we removed most of the stuff
Especially when his job is execution
Especially after hitler abused them
the next president can change our countries entire immigration system by themselves
which is stupid
our congress is just pathetically inept at doing literally anything
luckily, biden isnt using executive orders for anything other than undoing the urgently problematic trump policies.
For now
No matter where you stand, these are dangerous and shouldn't be used
Our congress is useless generally
Our whole government tbh. Completely lost faith in them many years ago
Only in urgent situations where it would take to long to go thru congress, but congress should validate it later and turn it into legislation
Not sure why I ever had faith in it
That's what we did here with covid
but lets give them more power, like over our healthcare
If you don’t think Biden is going to abuse EO too, you’re very naive
cause that isn't that important
He would be stupid to not do it
Mhm
congress is happy to sit back and let courts write laws, which is not what they are supposed to do. congress passes legislation that is so vague, the courts end up writing the actual law.
I don’t think our system is fixable at this point without a significant fuckup similar to nazi Germany
And I don’t want that to happen either
my go-to example, is the authorization for use of force in the middle east that keeps getting renewed
from 9/11
The president has had the ability to declare war since nam
that doesn't apply to the situation in the middle east at all, but no one in congress wants to change anything cause they could be blamed if it goes poorly later
Congress never does shit, they tried to limit him to 90 days or whatever but everyone knows they would just roll over
well, I don't have a huge problem with them doing nothing, cause that means they cant do anything too crazy either 🙂
like the senate probably isn't going to get rid of the filibuster
Yup
so there isn't gonna be some nutty stuff passed there
The US is just completely fucked and nothing will probably ever change that
We just have to hope that our ruling class doesn’t fuck us over at every chance they get like they usually do
well I don't think that's true, I think the US is doing just fine from my point of view
its no where near its best rn
but still better than, well, anywhere else imo.
Yeah all this doomsday talk is very largely propaganda from the extremes showing
Oh I’m not saying doomsday
I think with all of the riots this past year, the inability for our ruling class to be able to work together, 400k dead from a preventable disease (and many more to come), the capitol being raided by terrorists, we are in a pretty fucked situation and I certainly don’t see the light at the end of the tunnel
We were very close to having a large part of our legislative body assassinated
ok... and its over now
We were very close to having a large part of our legislative body assassinated
no
not even close, they were evacuated before anyone got in
we've had presidents assassinated before
still here
as for rioting... we've certainly had worse before as well
I’d call that very close
I think all the riots last year, the damage estimate equals "just" the rodney king riots in LA
Oh it’s definitely not over either
not to mention... we literally had a civil war. and.... still here
I think there is something attractive about being present for the end of something, idk what that is, but people like to think, oh this is the end all the time
Just because the US has been fucked for most of its history doesn’t mean that it isn’t fucked now
I’m not saying this is the end..
I don’t see it getting any better, no
?????
dems have full control of legislative body
biden has decent plans
and that's not better?
??????????????????????????????????????
if you don't see the US ever getting better... why tf are you here?
I think you’re misinterpreting what I mean
And I don’t think it’s worth explaining it, don’t really want to argue
lmao
'racist old white man out', racist old white man in
Best headline I read today
"Florida man goes home after four tumultuous years in public office."
Joe Biden is the first actor from Parks and Recreation to become the President of the United States.
52352
336385
so someone explain how biden can use an EO to rejoin the paris climate accord?
I thought the senate had to approve all treaties?
has the leave been fully done yet or?
I heard some people say rejoin, I heard some say stop the leave
idk, I can't find info on that. smth said it takes 4 years, but idk
paris climate accord is trash anyways imho
everybody apparently commited to reduction rates worse than they where already doing, and some of the worse offenders where all like "Oh, yea, we'll reach our peak in 2030, maybe"
obama used an eo to join it
trump used an eo to leave it
now biden is using an eo to rejoin it lol
is it really a treaty, i guess?
yes it is.
The Paris Agreement is a legally binding international treaty on climate change
oh, yes, yes it is
SHUT UP MACHINE
I mean, yea
somebody was saying, would be nice if the US used their "we're rejoining" to actually basically have some push on 'we gotta move faster'
oh there's smth called executive agreements which is different
killing the pipeline in some aspects is also kinda meh
Like, we're not reducing our oil needs right now, not having to transport that stuff by train/truck or whatever surely would be a nicer option in many respects
maybe the long term plan is that by the time it's actually built, we'll have hopefully pushed down enough to be able to justify without, but, hmph
The Paris Climate Accord never went through the Senate to begin with
iirc they crafted it to go as far as they thought they could get away with without an actual treaty
This concert or whatever they're calling it is kind of awkward
Tom Hanks is there emceeing but he clearly doesn't want to be
Song starts at 1:20
The scene when Max Goof who wants to impress his HS crush Roxanne by doing a Powerline dance in front of the entire student body on the last day of school. Seriously one of my favorite songs.
By the way the video as will all my others has already been put into 1080p HD. Youtube somehow misses that process which sometimes le...
I forgot Pauly Shore was in that movie
What the...
You can stream all of my songs here;
Spotify: https://smarturl.it/01poj5
Itunes: https://smarturl.it/4mnqma
SPECIAL THANKS TO ALL MY TOP PATRONS
Stephen Kislack
Brandon Monterrosas
Aminda Smith
Frank Scheele
Raymond W. Treß
mike maynard
Zak Wheeler
Roger Weidner
Debbie Reber
Michael Reed
BECOME A PATRON: https://www.patreon.com/maestroziikos
...
TIL Gabe Newell has been "stranded" in New Zealand for all of 2020 and is considering moving Valve there
A games company of that size in NZ would potentially be real good for internet connections in the area
Especially with server hosting etc
Currently AU/NZ have awful international connections and server hosting here is ridiculously expensive
I doubt they'd be moving servers there :p
I more mean valve would be more likely to invest resources in improving the situation if they’re physically in the area
He was stranded in the beginning and then just didn't want to leave
And I mean, who would. Beautiful country, amazing people, and a great leader rn
Why couldn't the polticans change the system cat?
The BBC is a statutory corporation, independent from direct government intervention, with its activities being overseen from April 2017 by the BBC Board and regulated by Ofcom.[97][98] The chairman is Sir David Clementi.[99]
It's really bastardized
I know that it's independent from direct stuff
It's here too, and thats a good thing
But there's gotta be a law that governs the structure of this relationship
And that can be adjusted
Basically, they act as their entire seperate entity, the government doesn't really seem to either have much interest or much control in the BBC, and it's basically managed as an entirely seperate private ran entity, meaning that we as the public don't really have much say
e.g. a fair chunk of us have wanted to decriminalise not paying the license fee, especially as most of those who see the courts are generally council estate single mums who already have enough issues
Ofc, the BBC doesn't wanna do that, because that will affect their income as those on the breadline or sick of the way they manage stuff in general will just stop paying
Like, a heavy part of the reason that I don't pay for a TV license is that I heavily disagree with the BBCs practices over the years of coving up for creeps, they're hated by both side of the political isles to varying degrees of controversy, but, in general, they don't even really offer anything of quality, I don't watch live TV for the sake of not paying for a license, and, that kinda blows, but, it doesn't blow enough to cover how much I don't wanna support the BBC
Government seems to have a whole lot of possible control, similar how it is here
The Royal Charter is the constitutional basis for the BBC. It sets out the public purposes of the BBC, guarantees its independence, and outlines the duties of the Trust and the Executive Board.
that charter no longer exists
Restructing, basicaly, iirc
they basically have their own seperate board
Filled with their ppl?
Or like the body i described we have here where its a broad mix of the society
I'm honestly not 100% sure, really, it seems like the board is partially government placed them into the board and the rest is filled by the board itself
Like, if there is a way that we have a real proper say over the BBC, I got no idea wtf that is, and generally with all the political pandering, it gets weird
Like, you can really tell when the BBC is tryna get a favour off the government as they start kinda being somewhat more nice to the tories
But that's the kinda shit those bodies normally should avoid?
Well, the recent "upbeats" have been when there was actual discussions to decriminalise not paying the fee, but, with covid, those discussions kinda disappeared from my understanding, not heard about it in like a year or so
REPORTER: "Will [Biden] keep Donald Trump's Air Force One color scheme change?
PSAKI: "This is such a good question!" https://t.co/PafHiBtRUs
980
3601
I agree with the PressSec. It is a good question, cause it’s literally meaningless
Journalism is... well, not doing well I don’t think.
oh no
shocking
what a revolation
Where'd I put... erm... lemmie jus... oh
/s
Like, maybe if the reporter was for “Private Airplane Interior Magazine” or smth, but I’m not sure they have a White House correspondent
Well
color me fucking surprised
I wish boris would just fuck off already
Like, he was the scape-goat for brexit
maybe I'm far too middle of the line for the tory party, but, like, I get a feeling that his push forward for PM was purely a game of russian roulette as to who had to pick up the job from may
Boris has forever been basically seen at the level of ralph wiggum and even looks like him enough that I can picture him just spooning the PVA glue into his cake hole
it was kinda comical when may called for a special election
Oh, yea, our party is so strong, we'll win a better majority if we re-run, and ended up having to team up with some other party nobody really liked afaik, and offered them a boat ton of cash at the same time as people are starving in the streets
and, yea, we've known for weeks
Like, they announced it a few weeks ago that they where delaying the 2nd dose, and it's like
You're not protected if you've not had the 2nd dose
I'm conflicted over if covid is gonna be the next "flu"
Like, part of me hopes that it fucks off
But, I mean, apparently 1/5th of the population or something has been tested positive thus far
ohhh, wait, no, 1/50
Hey, I'd be thinking finally we're about to get it over with 😄 😦
oh, damn
wait
That's HAS
Not, has OR had
that's HAS
Clearly she said that as in "really, that's what you gonna ask on day one, what's wrong with you", but since she knows here role she stays friendly and does her job, will prolly just say no change planned as of now tomorrow and go on
Honestly, it's refreshing to see that kind of answer instead of rhetoric
It was a bullshit question and she even acknowledged that before asking it, it's just for fun
actually the feeling I have is that there is a problem of not enough education, lmao
that is just... wow
thing is, that person is only able to write that comment because they were educated
Nah, some are well aware of the correlation. They just don't necessarily make the appropriate connection to why it happens and may instead think it's some liberal conspiracy.
CNN reported Thursday that Biden and his advisers are inheriting a nonexistent coronavirus vaccine distribution plan to speak of from the Trump administration, with sources telling CNN that they'll have to essentially "build everything from scratch."
Plan was to use FEMA to set up federal vaccine sites, right?
I guess I should just read
fema and the national guard i believe
and the feds would compensate the costs for using the national guard i believe

What does “WWG1WGA” mean lol
"Where We Go One, We Go All"
where we go one we go all
Not the best acronym lol
its like a three musketeers kinda thing i guess
They think it was a thing from JFK and was a call for unity but I can't be sure if that's true or not because it's all been drown out on Google by them and them saying it's from JFK
Everyone probably knows at least the gist of this by now but I have to post it anyway because it's just so crazy:
QAnon exists as a kind of parallel history, in which a "deep state" took over decades ago. An all-encompassing theory of the world, it appears to tie together and explain everything from "Pizzagate" to ISIS to the prevalence of mass shootings and the JFK assassination.
It claims the military, supposedly eager to see the deep state overthrown, recruited President Trump to run for president. But the deep state, which controls the media, quickly tried to smear him through "fake news" and unfounded allegations of collusion with Russia. It goes on to insist that despite the deep state's best efforts, however, President Trump is winning, and that Q is releasing sanctioned leaks to the public in order to galvanize them ahead of "The Storm," which is the moment when the deep state's leaders are arrested and sent to Guantanamo Bay. QAnon believers have called this process "The Great Awakening."
That's some spectacular bullshit right there
wtf
An impeachment inquiry against Joe Biden, the 46th president of the United States, was initiated by Georgia Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene on January 21, 2021. The six articles of impeachment were filed less than thirty hours into Biden's term, which allege Biden partook in a "quid pro quo in Ukraine." The articles additionally state that...
Most of the people I've personally seen who leave education as a "uber liberals" went into it as a liberal lites, in a sense; I'm not too sure how many people switch from a conservative standing point to a more liberal one, prior to going to college, I was somewhat "imma just vote for who my locals vote for", which being in a labour locked kinda area, sorta had me leaning towards them
and yea, knew that one was coming, was announced a few days ago or something
Hopefully that does not pass x_x
I mean, there's videos and such of him basically bragging about getting rid of a Ukraine prosecutor from what I've seen
Yeah, a corrupt prosecutor. Who the USA wanted removed, and European countries wanted removed. Because he wasn't investigating corruption. This whole thing has been covered in great detail. Here's the first result I got that upon skimming seemed to cover it pretty well. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/10/21/fact-check-joe-biden-leveraged-ukraine-aid-oust-corrupt-prosecutor/5991434002/
Not only covered, but investigated in detail too.
So, yes, he did do what he's accused of
Just, he didn't do it for the reason he's accused of
is what I'm getting from that
Yeah. In the same way that I accuse myself of enjoying a quesadilla tonight for dinner. I sure did!
Yeah. Classic combining of fact and fiction, using the trueness of the fact to "prove" the fiction.
It was really just him bragging about how unlike your normal VP he had actual responsibilities and Obama trusted him
The US wanted that guy gone, other countries who were giving Ukraine money wanted that guy gone, Biden got to be the person who went and strongarmed the Ukrainians to do it
So is there a chance of Biden being impeached?
House elections are every 2 years for all of them
That would be 2023 then no?
Senate is 1/3 of the seats every 2 years so each Senator has a 6 year term
it's 2021 right now
I see
How long is it between election and taking office where you're from?
21.10.2019 was the last federal election
So Canada then
yes
Do they win the election then just show up to work in Ottawa on the next flight or something?
No clue
I guess it doesn't happen on any kind of regular schedule so it'd be harder to notice
He's been PM since 2015 or something
What I meant was you guys don't have scheduled elections or specific terms of office, everyone is just in power until the bickering gets too bad and they can't agree to do things anymore
No clue :P
How do you feel about Navalny. I don't want to raise a discussion
Navalny is a patriot with balls of steel
I don't know anything about his politics but he could have just not gone back
Just because Putin is evil doesn't automatically make anyone against him good and I haven't looked in to Navalny enough to say either way
tomorrow there is rally in russia, but im from kazakhstan
agree
It's been 32 hours and still no mandatory pegging Executive Order.
smdh, another Q promise broken
245
1663
Parler, the beleaguered social network advertised as a "free speech" alternative to Facebook and Twitter, has had a tough month. Apple and Google removed the Parler app from its stores, and Amazon blocked the platform from using its hosting services. Parler has since found a home in DDoS-Guard, a Russian digital infrastructure company. But now…
tldr the company has a paper presence in Belize so they can get the still available IPs there from LACNIC but now LACNIC appears to be revoking their AS number and taking back the address space
You have to run an actual physical business in Latin America to qualify
ouch
The problem with the Burisma/Biden/Prosecutor situation is from memory internal executive memo's highlighted a conflict of interest between Biden and Ukraine (due to Hunter's involvement) before the threat of withholding the Congressionally approved funds from Ukraine (the executive branch actually withholding them is illegal in the US).
In March 2016, testimony to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, former ambassador to Ukraine John E. Herbst stated, "By late fall of 2015, the EU and the United States joined the chorus of those seeking Mr. Shokin's removal" and that Joe Biden "spoke publicly about this before and during his December visit to Kyiv". During the same hearing, assistant secretary of state Victoria Nuland stated, "we have pegged our next $1 billion loan guarantee, first and foremost, to having a rebooting of the reform coalition so that we know who we are working with, but secondarily, to ensuring that the prosecutor general's office gets cleaned up."
Page 47 of the PDF, the document's own page numbers have it as 43
lol the title
S:\FULLCO~1\HEARIN~1\2016 Hearings -- Working\03 15 2016 -- 30-526\30-526.txt
Probably from some stenography machine that spits out a text file and knows how to talk on a network that was purchased in 1997
@NBCNews She's wearing the traditional Slovenian divorce dress.
247
3559
did not disappoint
CHUCK SCHUMER FROM THE SENATE FLOOR
“Donald John Trump incited the ERECTION, insurrection against the United States"
How weird that Dr. Fauci can now share facts about how bad the pandemic is and he doesn't have to worry about being undermined or fired by the president
23684
256328
Got my first dose today! 🙂
Our county did it in the worst way possible - by making it first come first serve with only 300 vaccines to distribute... So I was there 3.5 hours before it started (as a teacher) and waited.
Over here they're basically calling people in to get it or something, but, they tried to make for a 12 week delay between the first and second dose, and have somehow (it's been fucking known for weeks if not months you don't get any real protection until the 2nd dose) found out that that's too late and magically outside of the manfs recommendations, so, god knows what they're doing
I think this is more for the folks in Portland but... neat https://twitter.com/Best_Beta4lyfe/status/1352809389573328897
Ok, here is the first video of the two. The Horizontal Catch.
This is my first ever video edit, so. . . Enjoy its mediocrity.
Stay safe, y'all. https://t.co/KZbOkRcYZ3
393
1813
That was on my timeline as a retweet from someone in Portland, I can guess what they want to use it for 😛
lol what
A conspiracy theory that a member of Joe Biden's Secret Service detail is his "Chinese government handler" has been floating around MAGA Twitter since the inauguration. (The man in question is of Korean descent and has worked for the Secret Service for years.)
cc: @ZellaQuixote
128
331
Trump and Biden
https://www.out.com/celebs/2021/1/20/how-miley-cyruss-preference-remarks-show-underlying-transphobia
Biden said trumps letter was "generous"
Whether he actually wrote it or not I don't know
At this rate, the United States could have 70% of people vaccinated (2 doses) in 306 days (or by 26 Nov 2021).
70% is the bare minimum before we can try to go back to normal
It could be worse:
At this rate, the European Union could have 70% of people vaccinated (2 doses) in 1,563 days (or by 6 May 2025).
Does that take into account the J&J vaccine?
Also, I don’t think 70% of people in the US even want the vaccine
The vaccine manufacturer are trolling us here
They are not delivering
Iirc there's a lawsuit coming
Not even 70% of health care workers want the vaccine.
Smth smth education
Yeah, health care workers.... known for their lack of education.
This only takes in account the current reported rates of vaccination
It's the current trend extrapolated out to infinity, no predictions about likely changes
I am talking about general education, and most importantly, media competency
Oh ok, well I think that’s pretty useless then.
only 73% of doctors, and just under 50% of nurses, in Germany want to be vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2.
I nowhere said I was claiming to prove that...?
But, that quote kinda proves my point. Doctors are more educated than nurses, thus more likely to get the vaccine
But I would think doctors would be the most educated in this. Everywhere. 73% is pretty low no?
Yeah, shows how bad the situation is
But such discussions are purely philosophical until we can actually get our hands on the vaccine, lol
In my city, we build the vaccination center 6 weeks ago
Not a single person has been vaccinated there
Cause we got no vaccine
Cause companies don't deliver, or deliver way less than they promised
I also have no faith in government to actually know what is best. The US government thought giving thalidomide to babies was a good thing for decades before they realized it was a horrible thing. The government has a less than stellar track record when it comes to this stuff.
And if you say, well we know more now, yes we do, and they thought that back then, and in 40 years, they’ll look back at us saying, they knew nothing.
Iirc, the pharmaceuticals have liability waivers for this vaccine anyways.
It would probably ruin them either way, due to pr issues, but still.
That was probably a condition of buying the vaccine
It's not only your government, it's everybodies government
No ik that.
I was just using the us gov as an example (thalidomide) that I know about.
Everybody agrees that the risk of the vaccine is lower than the risk of the virus, so it's a no brainer
I like what Schumer said today.
I gotta admit, I'm kinda on the Signal CEO's side here
It's a really difficult problem in which the solution is another problem
But ultimately technology simply exists, and good and evil are not only social constructs but entirely subjective
That leaves deterministic action to follow the same path everyone else does
Which means they'll have to start curating their platform, which means they'll have a platform
It's certainly a problem, just leaving a technology alone and hoping nobody "bad" uses it
But the alternative is undermining what that technology was supposed to stand for
And we've already done that so many times with so many messaging apps, now
If you want that, use one of those
the problem is trying to find the balance between solving these security concerns and keeping those likely to do shit on board
There's no balance because the concept is an absolute
The idea is encryption. Absolute, perfect privacy
Like, if signal was to open the door, many of those people are going to shift off to an alternative platform which is more underground
Yea, that's the entire issue, really
Either you have privacy or you don't
Yeah, that leaves it with either no compromise, or any compromise completely undermining the core idea
There's no middle ground here, at all
No grey area
The thing is that I don't really see a long term solution to this
It's a really damned hard choice
How do you regulate an underground E2E encrypted platform, is the issue
Yea, which is the entire issue, the only "secure" solution they have is to ban encryption, which, no underground market is going to listen to and all that, it really is a no-win imho
And signal is E2E in the purest form
The only messaging app that does it completely
Yeah, there's no winning for everyone here
And possibly no winning for anyone
Yea, I don't see how there'd be a long term win
as people of risk would just move towards less regulated platforms
decentralized social media has been a sorta like background shadow of a growing hype.. to, about 20 people runs or something
I think the only way anyone wins is if regulation gives up and Signal, etc are able to keep using absolute privacy
And that's probably not happening
And even if it did by some miracle many people would hate that outcome
And many more would be torn
But that's what happens when you deal in absolutes
Especially on that scale
Hm. It’s a hard issue to ponder.
the way I see it is that no matter what you're SOL unless you're solely hoping the catch the dumb ones
sol?
the only way I could see signal pulling that out is sneaking out some master key, but, people are ofc gonna see that type of stuff, nor could you change older keys without people noticing, etc
shit outta luck
It will be really interesting, the EU seems to be focused on tackling this problem, we will see what bullshit they come up with
Like, one of the things I see is that people tryna pass laws over encryption generally understand fuck all about it, and are generally seemingly heading in the way of wanting to even make SSL illegal or something
You still can't export some basic encryption algos to china from the US 😂
just wait till they find out that theres open source impl's of those on github
Countless of those actually have disclaimers you can't use them in china, i saw that before
I have divided feelings. But I don’t think it’s simple either way.
I don't think that you can win here
and I think that the general stance of tryna outlaw encryption is more dangerous than not
Well, I think we would agree that no dead people is a win.
Yes, but I aim to have a sense of realism
That's basically it. We're dealing with absolutes, and when it comes down to it I'll choose encryption over no encryption
I think we’d agree, at a minimum, that no terrorist attack is a good thing.
I don't think that you can have no deal people no matter what you do
*no dead people
It's a hard problem only because the choice is so simple
you ban encryption, people are just gonna move to more underground platforms
you ban encryption, all of a sudden, accessing peoples bank info is easy, or, people go towards doing stuff like just using unregulated VPNs for even checking their emails
Why does it have to be “ban encryption”?
Why must an option be portrayed as an extreme?
What other option is there?
As long crypto exist, bad ppl will use it to avoid law enforcement
and, well, am just going off what regulators are generally seemingly aiming for
Unless you got machine power to breach that particular crypto i guess
Because that would be it. The premise is an absolute, so the solution must be as well. Though at least in this particular case it wouldn't be "ban encryption" - it would just be "backdoor encryption" or "undermine encryption"
For a moment, let’s just consider the nsa PRISM program,
Which arguably is worse
Which was/is illegal
I don’t like it. And information on its success or abuse isn’t readily available for review. But there wasn’t mass abduction of law abiding people or even law breaking people. It was aimed for a specific extremist issue.
I guess what I’m trying to suggest is,
By looking at everybodies shit
It's unacceptable methodology
They also had no mandate, it was not regulated, etc
Signal, in its current from, has absolute, perfect privacy due to its encryption standards and choice. The problem is that perfect privacy leaves an opening for people of a different ideology to use that technology
I don’t think we can always say that principal rules for everything, even though I do believe principal is very important
You can't solve that problem without undermining the very thing you're trying to save
Ehh. Not true.
This is one of the very, very few things in which there is no compromise. No grey area
Police and military power don’t have to undermine total freedom or democracy.
how many years did prism operate for? how many attacks did it stop?
You can have two counter concepts co existing, not without issues of course
That's not public, i think snowedens documents still are the only info we have?
How many times was it abused to the point that people were improperly jailed?
I got varying sources counting between 0 and 50, and we already know that the system was flawed and the people running it where basically lying iirc
There is nothing you can do to solve the problem of "keep perfect privacy but also let the 'good guys' circumvent your perfect privacy" because that, in itself, is a logic hole
You either have perfect privacy and nobody can see anything, or you don't
Then no perfect privacy.
That's it
I mean, the US still treats snowden like a traitor, not like the hero he is
Privacy, with review for extreme cases
snowden is basically a political pawn and fucked
Snowden is a traitor.
I'm on the side of, "if I have to choose an absolute between encryption and no encryption, I'd rather have encryption"
He did something courageous, but didn’t have the right to do it
So my choice is clear
He worked with the organisations to redact info which could harm others and gave them forewaring about releases to provide that info
Snowden is a whistleblower, he worked for an org that did stuff it wasn't allowed to, he and made that public
That's not being a traitor, that's being a patriot
It's shitty that he exposed it in some respect, but, the government working behind closed doors breaking the laws it expects you to follow is not a good way to retain trust from the public
A bomber blew up a communications building. He blared a warning sound. Does that make it ok?
Snowden told the world that the US was doing illegal stuff against its own people
Trying to do something right doesn’t make the wrong thing better. There was a better way to do it.
it blows ass that he did it, but, that stuff shouldn't be kept from the public
Against its own and everybody else
what better way?
We already know that the people running those programs straight up lied to the government about their operations
Yeah what better way? Whistle blowing is the last resort. As you can see, it destroys your life. But he still did it which makes him a hero
While there are some cases where I would agree with that sentiment, I would not use it in those terms. Being a martyr alone doesn't make one a hero.
He co-ordinated releases of information which public agencies which allowed them to protect people
I believe that a corrupt entity doing corrupt things should be exposed, and when you've used all avenues, what do you do? accept that the government is breaking its own laws?
Fact: you sign an NDA when you get a secret/top secret. The NDA you sign says that if you spill any information for any reason, period, you get sent to federal prison at minimum. Period. End of discussion. Nothing you can say or do will save you. There is no trial, no jury, no judge. Only you and the executioner.
Because that's how democracy works 😂
Corrupt entity?
I'd argue that knowingly breaking the law as a business model is corrupt
I'd argue that knowngly lying to what I think was congress about your operations is corrupt
Who lied?
I forget the exacts
I confused at how you're arriving at the conclusions of "corrupt" and "lied" and all that...
The patriot act was, for better or worse, put in place due to an event.
That's not really a conclusion as it's a well documented fact
The patriot act has been used to relatiate on news organizations and their sources
that entity literally lied to the public about their operations to hide what they where doing
Obama made that famous, trump made it worse
Does the US military lie to the public if they do not disclose the locaiton of nuclear weapons to the American public and the world?
If they say it's at A and it's at B that's a lie
If they say we don't disclose cause national security that's different
That said, there is usually a trial to see how long you get to stay in fed. prison for. Minimum 10 years and some insane fine that will absolutely bankrupt you, that much I know
I'm just confused how something is a corrupt lie...
They literally lied to the public about their operations and what they do
Who is 'they'?
the NSA
And what was the lie?
The NSA..
The NSA lied about... what?
You're not familiar with the Snowden incident?
I am familiar.
I'd have to find an article to recall all the specifics
my brains generally trash at remembering a ton of stuff especially with my health
Essentially the NSA promised not to spy on U.S. citizens for no reason, proceeded to mass-surveil the entire U.S., and lied about doing so while doing so
This is a good list
Yea, that's the article I was tryna look over to link
Egg, I am well aware what the PRISM program was and the Snowden issue
What I mean is they definitely, on record, lied about a lot of things they did that were specifically against their orders and the law
So there's that
Like I said. What lies.
See above link
To my understanding, whether it was something revered or despised, it was lawful.
It was not
As I have said before, I don't like the PRISM program, but not liking something doesn't make it illegal.
Where not saying it's illegal because we don't like it
It was explicitly illegal and against their orders
^
As in, actually, fully illegal
While I understand you may feel that way, that has not been proven.
It has been proven
I am confused
How are you not familiar with this?
There were trials and everything
Denial is strong with this one
Insulting someone because you don't agree with them doesn't back up your case.
That isn't an excuse for incivility.
There's at least one article on it after a quick Google
This was my first google result
It was, as discussed and judged, in a court, by officials, illegal
And no, I am not denying facts. I asked, quite clearly.
Ah, I wasn't aware of this outcome.
But it does say: "the court ruled the illegal surveillance did not taint the evidence introduced at their trial"
I get not knowing something, but those were the first google results for "nsa illegal activity"
Could have saved yourself some time
Do you google how to boil water?
Fun fact #2: in "pot calling the kettle black" the kettle is not actually black, but shiny. The pot is seeing its own reflection
Many people assume both are black, but that is not the case
And it changes the meaning of the phrase slightly
ohhh, look at me, I passed englliiiish lit
But what about the grain?
Ok, so given we agree now that snowden exposed information of public interest and highlighted a corrupted agency, is he still a traitor to the americans people?
He put people at risk, which is disagree able with
But, right now, the leading of him not being pardened overall seems politcal rather than moral
He tried to prevent as much damage as possible
He's not like the absolutists that assange is
Assange is way more controversial, i understand that, even tho the current ruleling against him in the UK is bullshit
I'm reading more details abut the case because teh Reuters reporting is vague.
The judges did not see the violation as fit a reason to overturn convictions. Which means that they don't believe that the activity they deemed to be wrong necessarily affected the case.
So I don't think it is appropriate to say that Snowden was a hero. I think at a minimum the fact that he ran means that he knew he was wrong to have done it. Had he stood by his convictions, he could have stayed and fought the good fight for his freedom in court. Prove to the American people that he was worthy. But we don't have clarity as to why he fled to Russia. I'm not saying that Snowden's intentions were bad or good. But going to the place that threatens our cybersecurity and threatens our information isn't a good thing.
Nothing obviously exists in a vacuum.
Snowden fled because he knows that the US would execute an example on him, not giving him a fair trail. Also the US doesn't have protections for whistle blowers, they only have laws for retaliation. Fleeing was the only sane thing to do. And russia wasn't his first choice, it's just more or less his only choice, so it's not fair to hold that against him.
The Obama administration was know for fighting hard against this kinda stuff
If a person believes that he/she should act outside the confines of the law for a purpose only he/she believes he/she have jurisdiction over, then isn't that the very type of activity we call illegal?
What they did was illegal, that's well established
Not at the time. This is only months ago.
The question for many is was the intents of their actions in the interest of the public
hm?
Does a person have the right to do something illegal if he/she believes something else is illegal or wrong?
Well, that's part of the entire nuance here
I don't think someone has the right to do something wrong just because he/she feels justified.
The thing is is that his trails by the government, not the public
the government is pretty well visibly set in punishing him for his actions
The public which I've seen are sloooowly more leaning towards believing what he did was justified
Thinking about this...
the pentagon papers are kind of similar arent they?
In the sense that an illegal act was committed to draw the veil on what had been happening
But Daniel Ellsberg didn't flee.
from the header on wiki, apparently so
Any whistleblower that isn't protected by laws to protect whistleblowers ends up in situations like this
See, I think that as mini noted, the obama admin pretty much set their stance that this type of activity was never gonna be tolerated
I still think Snowden should not have run.
and at least as far as I've seen, the entire political system wants to shaft him
Worth noting is that laws got worse for whistleblowers in the US
So it's not certain that snowden would be as fairly treated as ellsberg
I would have loved to see a trial, but, I don't think it had any potential chance of coming out good for snowden, especially with how much pressure was behind him
It's not certain that Snowden did not do something else.
here's a fun one
Only thing that is certain is that the NSA did break rules and laws and that snowden made that public
Do you believe that the people in places like, say china, should be allowed to shout to the world about their governments illegal treatment of them?
In thinking about the Pentagon Papers, I am re-considering my stance. Both Snowden and Ellsberg knew they were committing illegal acts because of something they felt was wrong.
And was later proven wrong
snowden knew it was wrong, but to his credit, did take action to prevent people being at risk
They had no way of knowing if they would be backed up at the time.
As I said, the legal situation, especially under the Obama administration, is way different tho
And was shown prior to snowden
even thought what snowden has leaked has been confirmed to show that was illegal was correct, the government still wants him behind bars
Just look at what happened to Chelsea manning
There is no considering towards, was what he did moral? it's more, is what he did illegal?
We all know that what he did was illegal and can agree on it
Neither person sought to contact the office of special counsel, as would be the first criteria for whistleblower protection.
well wait, the office didnt exist for ellsberg
so ellsberg gets a pass (from me on this)
Whistleblowing is by nature, a pretty sensitive topic. But i do believe that if the information in question is of public interest, and especially if that lead to convictions and trails and stuff, i do believe the whistleblower should be protected as they served the american public
I'm sure the nuclear launch codes are also of public interest.
Something merely being in the public interest can't be enough.
that's part of the issue, however
Everyone can state that something is good for subjective reasons.
but, the us gov isn't denying that a nuclear launch system which requires codes exists
Well, I mean, i'd hope/imagine that there's more processes involved then scrolling through the click wheel on this cheapo combi locks when you forgot the code after you hadn't touched in in years
Yea, I mean, there's got to be reasonable expectations for where public interest lies and where protecting the country exists
So where does the interest in national defense fit into the illegality or legality of Snoden's activity?
If gov agencies do something wrong, that's automatically of public interest, since only the public can hold them accountable
what if it's wrong but the people are still behind it because it was the best option 
You mean like the nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
I am not confident on the stats of public opinion at the time of bombing two major civilian cities
that was found unneeded too, iirc
it was, yes. The benefit of hindsight is strong though
Why not? There was so much hate and propaganda.
plus, we're not talking about what we know now, or what military leaders knew then - more what the general public opinion was at the time
Well, yes, but I'd argue that even before hindsight it was somewhat of an excessive move unless there were severe overestimations of japans militiary might at that point
I imagine it was popular as it effectively and quickly put an end to a terrible war. But it was done in a wholly terrible and unnecessary manner
severe overestimations of japans militiary might at that point
from what I have read, there were not - military leaders were polarized on the necessity of a nuke
but military leadership is of no concern, only the public
to me, it seemed that the US generally just wanted to do a big flex on the world
yeah, and certainly ending the war was a great excuse to do it
but yes tresswa I imagine it was wrong and still backed by the public
"In 1945, a Gallup poll immediately after the bombing found that 85% of Americans approved of using the new atomic weapon on Japanese cities. In 1991, according to a Detroit Free Press survey conducted in both Japan and the U.S., 63%"
This first use of a nuclear weapon by any nation has long divided Americans and Japanese. Americans have consistently approved of this attack and have said it was justified. The Japanese have not. But opinions are changing: Americans are less and less supportive of their use of atomic weapons, and the Japanese are more and more opposed.
"But a 2015 Pew Research Center survey finds that the share of Americans who believe the use of nuclear weapons was justified is now 56%"
And since the people are meant to hold the government accountable, and they didn't, it was an American choice and not some general's risky move
Well, the government generally showcased it off as the end all ultimate solution to the war
It was Truman. Not a general
The american people wanted and end to the war so bad that when they got it, they excused the means to the end
the fact that they would have easily won (or more, finished) without the nuke I have doubts was a public discourse type subject
What does easily won mean though?
I was generalizing, military leadership vs the public. that's a fairly irrelevant detail because it was both truman and several generals, while several other generals were opposed
there was no real further escalation which took american lives
Yep, instant flex to end the war
There would have needed to be an invasion
And I'm sure they would have kept dropping nukes to end it. It was old. I've read reports that the Japanese had plans to surrender without the nukes, but I am not sure of their truth because well, after being nuked once you think they certainly would've
damn
reading this
Wait, are you sure? They tried to keep the war going even after
They tried a coup
The emperor won out though
I think that hindsight is an obvious sorta issue in looking at all of this
you don't really consider the lives of those in the spawling battlefield that would spread the nation and those who'd be killed in the process in the name of defending their country or even just simply being in the way
it's easy to say that the bomb killed dozens of civilians in an unnecessariy manner
also impossible to know what might have happened, only what actually happened
But, do we believe that japan would have surrendered if that wasn't done in a manner which would have killed less?
two cities worth is a lot more than dozens 😄
literally no way to know
relative to the size of the country, I stick to my wording
zzz, I think that needs modification to : "but did we believe japan would have surrendered...
imo relativity should be measured in human lives, because there's not much more valuable than that. Of course in a war military human lives are something different, but civilians are meant to be treated well because they really don't have much to do with any of it all
We like to think that way, but its not that simple
so in hindsight, killing two cities full of civilians should probably have been avoided, and it certainly was considered that bombing areas near cities to just flex might have a similar impact. But there's no way to know
Ultimately a military force supports the power structure they serve, which is supported by the civilian population, even in a dictatorship.
yes, but there are also rules of engagement, civilians are in general off limits. In certain circumstances that totally changes and is complicated, but two cities full of civilians? there was likely a better way
I'm not saying that destroying cities is right.
I know, and again we really do have hindsight
Maybe, but it isn't so simple. They knew, as we do today, that Japan was capable of terrible atrocities.
back then, sending some bombs off may have been the only perceivable guarantee to end the war as quickly as possible
everyone is capable of terrible atrocities, sanctioned or otherwise - there was a lot of compartmentalization going on
No, I meant they did terrible atrocities
I'm not saying that justifies more atrocities though
I understand, no argument there
I guess when we are scared that someone is doing the unthinkable, then we also resort to doing unthinkable things... if that makes sense?
Completely does
Escalation is a terrible thing
I took a class that focused heavily on what was termed "killing compartments"
if you can find academic reviews of Abram de Swaan's book on it, or even book summaries, it's a good subject
basically talks about how people become desensitized in 'us vs them' scenarios to the humanity of 'them'
sounds like an interesting read - im reading a wsj review of it
he mostly applies it germans, genocide-perpetrators, etc
but it can very easily be applied to americans
absolutely
especially since annihilating two cities of people in two days counts... probably? as mass murder
well even further back, slavery, subjection and elimination of native americans
I think maybe he didn't write on american nukes because it's not a great subject to get english speaking readers
very applicable to just about all of human history though
another good read is alon confino's A World Without Jews that basically applies this killing compartment phenomenon to Nazi Germany
and i wrote a summary review of it, if you care for the subject, which I am allowed to share
sadly it's a formatted pdf or I'd just upload it to bytebin 😄
hahaha good
i could ignore the lead in my water, and toxic gas and soot in my air, so long as i have a pdf
I can imagine a poorly designed canvas board that those moms use to decorate their homes that says in scriptic text : "PDFs make life grand"
but grand is done in disney logo font
brb, designing a shirt
hahaha
mmm warmth
ima go get some - in bed
gnite yall, for once an actually decent conversation in this channel too which was fantastic and refreshing
gnite
❤️
super late on all this but Snowden didn't flee to Russia
The US pulled his passport when he was on a layover there so he was stuck
Russia gave him asylum instead of sending him to the US
Point it he didn't flee to russia (the enemy!!!111) as tresswa said, but he just got stuck there
That's a notable difference
Quick thing on the Snowden thing. He absolutely shouldn’t be pardoned. While I might like what he did, you CANNOT remove the punishment for it, for all that will do is encourage other people to reveal information that would do serious harm to the national defense and not be really important. There has to be the consequence in order to ensure the motivation is correct.
If you think you’ll get away scot-free cause the pres would pardon you because what you leaked benefitted them politically or smth, that would open the flood gates and I don’t want that.
Also, on the whole atomic bomb thing... I think it’s a classic example of presentism.
It’s similar to slavery. If any of us were born 300 years ago, chances are pretty high, we’d have been OK with slavery. That was just how it was back then. We aren’t inherently “better” than people 300 years ago, we just came later. Chances are, in 150 years, YOU’ll be looked back as barbaric and cruel or smth, but right now, you’re just fine.
The problem with today, and considering the massive influx of information (or misinformation), is that we view the past with the morals of today without knowing the morals of the past
slavery wasnt just a european invention as some progressive viewpoints try to frame it, and hell, all the europeans did was jump onto the bandwagon when they took over the place.
Reason Europeans seem to have had a disproportionately bad influence is because they had a disproportionately large influence over the modern world
Didn't a lot of the people involved in the bombing think it was a bad idea from the start? And our leaders thought so as soon as the 50s
Seems like the real reason the bombing even happened was we wanted to see what it would do, not because we thought it would change anything in the war
People like the underdog.
An invasion of mainland japan was expected to kill more civilians than the bombing
The bombing of Dresden actually killed more people then the atomic bombings
The Japanese were trying to surrender before the bombing happened, we were arguing terms
Um, I think some of them were
But most of them were staunchly committed to the military dictatorship
What we did to German cities is basically equivalent to what we did to those two cities in Japan
We did more damage to Tokyo with traditional bombing than those two bombs too
yes
exactly
However the Japanese did not experience the additional damage of a traditional mainland invasion
Difference is those were, as much as we could, targeted strikes
Yes, I would say so
However Night bombing in WW2 was often sloppy enough that it killed a lot of civilians
If UK bombs would have worked as good as american bombs, my city would have looked like Dresden 😂
Atomic bombs just wipe out cities, traditional bombing was trying to hit factories and railroad and such
Well trying to yes
But they often hit civilians by working at night
And for an initial period, Americans & British initially targeted civilians in an attempt to "demoralize" the enemy
Can we just agree any bombing is bad?
I have a moral issue with that, but they eventually gave up as they realized targeted strikes were more effective
@near glen Yeah I think we're all on the same page there 😦
The Dresden example is a hard one to talk about because it got over-exaggerated by Nazis and their modern counterparts
Ww2 bombings are well documented
Tokyo is the better example for "we fucked up cities worse without nukes"
I really think that numerically it did kill more people than those atomic bombings
America basically leveled the whole east
Some would say nothing of value was lost tho 😂
Except for like all of european history 😢
Which is just a series of wars of course
So live by the sword die by the sword 😆
Nice 😄
About 25,000 people were killed during the bombing of Dresden but the Nazis tried to say it was 200,000 and some try to claim it was 500,000
Um, I'm simply re-quoting what I know from Slaughterhouse 5
I really don't know the exact details of any of the bombings
We here in cologne went thru 262 air raids, some of them involving over 1000 bombers, 35k tons of bombs, 20k dead
And I think it's definitely true that overall Germany had a huge number of civilians deaths - even though they were generally targeted at factories and legit war targets
Yeah, Vonnegut said over 135,000 were killed and we leveled the city
It's unfortunate but I really think those two Japanese bombs fall into the same general class as the conventional bombings
He was wrong 😛
Brits called it operation millennium
Well that's comforting, but its still a horrifying book
Cats cradle really traumatized me
He got his number and details from a book written by a Nazi apologist
David John Cawdell Irving (born 24 March 1938) is an English author and Holocaust denier who has written on the military and political history of World War II, with a focus on Nazi Germany. His works include The Destruction of Dresden (1963), Hitler's War (1977), Churchill's War (1987) and Goebbels: Mastermind of the Third Reich (1996). In his ...
Wow thats very interesting - helps gives me some faith in the good-faith of the American bombers
Still I really think those two Japanese bombs fall into the same general class as the bombings we did to germany
The initial report from the city itself was ~25,000 and every later investigation done came up with about the same number
I think really any collateral damage is horrible, whether caused by conventional or atomic bombing
we didnt know much about the power of nuclear weapons, or at least the sheer scope of using it on a population center or two. there wasnt any specific rules to blow shit up with as bigger bomb during WWII
Including one done by the city in 2010 to try to put the matter to rest

