#politics
1 messages · Page 35 of 1
Difference between being a skeptic and a flat out conspiracy theorist.
oh gimme a break dude
Don't be the latter.
yeah, spacex is actually improving rocket tech
81 million vs 69.5 million is quite a large number to say yes more voted for Biden than Obama
There was also a larger turnout
When you say no conspiracies do you mean I can't speculate corruption of the government?
Because that is what a conspiracy is
If you're going to suggest election fraud, you're going to need to provide some compelling evidence
I mean, there's a discussion in here
Yes, theres some oddball stuff that I've heard of, but, seriously, unless you actually have something substantial to bring, no need to just randomly jump into a channel just to spark a heated pointless discussion
Otherwise if you want to discuss conspiracy theory without anything substantial, there's always r/conspiracy, but this probably isn't the place.
Do you believe Russia interfered in 2016
Russia interfered through a disinformation campaign, yes.
Nobody is saying Russia hacked our systems.
Interesting...
US also interferes with foreign elections. Nothing new
China is borderline fascist
and slavery
eh, same shit, different person
China under the PRC is a totalitarian state. Hard to argue against that.
They are far from being communist, as well.
there are so many different variations of communism that the naming is just to stroke the ego of the person who made it
marxism, leninism, stalinism, maoism
same fucking thing with a few tiny differences
yes
Anyone who genuinely looks at China and believes they are communist should seriously go learn what communism is.
🙄
the biggest issue with examples of communism is the mixture of the economic policy and the governering policy. the basis of communism is about economic policies, however all the big known communist societies were ruled by authoritarian regimes that were corrupt.
and companies still adhere to the communist party, which is similar to what the nazi's did
and the authoritarianism is the part that most people reference
It's like people who think America is a democracy. If you believe that, you need to go learn what a democracy is.
Noone in their right mind would call China capitalist, when everything you do has to be approved by the government and the government there interferes and controls all businesses in some way
communism requires authoritarianism
the old original native american tribes and other indgeninous tribes are communist.
America is a Constitutionally-backed Republic.
or in more mainstream terms, America is a democratic republic.
@dusky raft to force acceptance yes, unless the group desires it and accepts it democratically such as indiginous tribes
communism really best works at super small scale, large scale nearly requires authoritarinism
North Korea calls themselves a Democratic Republic. We know that's not true.
We do not vote for anything directly. We elect representatives. A democracy is when you vote issue-by-issue and all that matters is the popular vote. The electoral college guarantees that more rural and suburban areas can have a voice instead of all elections being determined by California and New York.
Just because a country associates with a certain label, doesn't maen that's what they are.
China is not communist.
People need to be very careful when they allow all of these "private businesses" control what they can and cannot say in the name of "safety"
so you rather allow misinformation to spread like 2016?
Its not up to Jack Dorsey to choose which information is true or false.
yeah its called the collective sane society
This is very broad
The issues is really fact checkers
I think companies can do what they want to do, they are private
if a statement is made that facts prove is untrue, it should be quelled
Or, people who control that stuff
Banning people from saying things you think are wrong means you think people are too stupid to make up their own mind. Very elitist
e.g. there are studies which show that masks in a closed room are basically useless which, makes a lot of sense, but was apparently pulled off twitter, etc
And, yea, I see the fears of morons being morons
trump did not win, there was no wide scale organized voter fraud by the dnc to steal the election
I'd rather be able to make up my mind than have it done for me by big tech
trumpers echo chambering that shit just makes people think its true
and hey trwitters allowing you to see that false information still
you can 'make up your mind' to be a dumbass or not to believe it
They've banned accounts for stuff like that
When twitter said that that newspapers site was unbanned from their service, they where still marked as banned
I can't believe the left thinks they aren't in an echo chamber when the right is disproportionately silenced on all major platforms. If you don't want them in an echo chamber then stop banning them and forcing them to set up camp elsewhere
yeah twitter jumped the gun on that story a little too fast
The right is the side that believes corporations are people.
Which means Twitter has a right to free speech and expression
See, I believe that twitter should have their right to moderate their platform how they see fit
cringe
Which means they are entitled to dictate how they moderate their own platform.
That makes them a publisher
do you really want to lose the right to control what content is put onto our minecraft communities?
But, I don't believe that they should have the protections that where essentially given to them under the "we can't realistically moderate this", when they're controlling that stuff
be forced to allow advertisements of competitors?
If you ever make it so Paper censors my players without any plugins installed I wont use it again
wat
You also have the choice to not use Twitter
Its up to the server owners what people say
We really do not care to do that
You have the choice to build a competitor to Twitter
The infrastructure and tooling is there.
If mojang added it, we would not be inclined to remove it
are you suggesting we would put in a filter into paper of our own
You aren't entitled to be on Twitter saying what you want to say.
But, really, why the fuck would we care to moderate what happens on your server?
Outside of specific issues in this community which are imho grounds for just being blasted out of a cannon into orbit
looks like mojang is adding a filter of some fashion likely, but prob done purely client side
But, hey, it's a free market
Minecraft servers are a platform. Until Microsoft eventually does that stupid thing they said where theyll delete accounts that commit "hate speech", right now I have the option to make the chat in my server as free as I want
I thought the right loves the free market.
Except when the free market goes against them, I guess.
if we added something like that, you'd be more than welcome to go jump onto a fork which removes that system
Yes
You're putting libertarians/ancaps mixed up with conservatives which is frankly, cringe
Libertarians believe in an unregulated free market. We still live in a free market with regulations. I'm not confusing them at all.
Any true Libertarian would be pro-open borders.
Let the private sector deal with it
yuck. They can say bye to sovereignty
personally, I support open borders
With open borders your vote as a citizen would be worthless
But, you gotta balance with the security implications, etc
No thanks
Indeed, but Libertarians are pretty hypocritical like that.
I mean, ideally, we wouldn't need to vote
we'd be in a happy world where people fuck off and mind their own business
The non aggression principle is so flawed. Not every problem can be solved by just leaving people alone
Not what I mean
You want anarchy?
What I mean is that many issues that people peddle over literally have fuck all impact on them
Name one
abortion
I disagree with abortions, 100% against late stage, but, at early stage, it's very, it doesn't affect me
I don't have any moral superiority to say that it's wrong or right
Do you think murder is wrong
I'd say that if you can't afford to have a child you should aim to stop it before that's a thing, but, it doesn't impact me
If its wrong to kill a toddler its wrong to commit abortion
is plan b murder?
Yes
I mean, the egg isn't even remotely viable when it goes as intended
So, there is hardly a life there to actually murder, especially if it's pre-release
But, as I said, i disagree with abortion, but, I'm not morally superior to say that it's 100% wrong, and I am defo against late-term, but it's not my body
My plan b if I got my GF pregnant before we're ready is to put it up for adoption. Anyone who thinks its better to just kill it because they think the baby is better off dead than adopted is borderline sociopathic
at the point in which you take plan b, there's no guarantee the pregnancy is going to go flawlessly (had plan b not been taken that is)
Tell me whats wrong with putting that baby up for adoption
Yes, tell me about all the happy children who get to enjoy and love their life in the adoption system
crickets
Dude, thats like your doctor being able to kill you because you aren't happy. The happiness of the baby after its born isnt a justification for killing it
Not what I'm saying
so you would rather have a kid have to go through possibly years of life changing mental pain than something that they wouldnt even know that happened to them?
Ever heard of kids going in and out of foster care?
What I'm saying is that by saying that you'd toss the child into adoption is that you basically don't give a single shit about the childs life after they're born
My theory is, If you aren't ready for it... don't do it
^^^^
If you can't take responsibility for your actions... well you're not ready to do that action
if you wanna put the whole, "you had a dick in you, so you can have the child", you gave birth to the child, tossing it off into a system known to cause long lasting issues for the majority of children is hardly any form of moral standing
Fix the foster care system then. Unhappiness is preferable to death
I'd disagree
Death is an experience. What we're talking about can't be experienced.
Especially seeing how the death would be before the child was even born
The foster care system does need to be fixed
But, people shouldn't be tossing children into a system
imo, the foster care shouldn't have to be as overloaded as it is
Therefore, no person is actually dying.
Its 100% a person
if people would take responsibility for their actions, none of this would be a problem
that's the biggest issue in the world, imo
A couple cells does not constitute a person imo
One of the biggest issues I hear about foster care is the paperwork pleasing
If you do the abortion in some late phase of the pregnancy I can see how you'd consider that murder, but in early stages? Not at all.
There are dozens of families capable of adopting who'd be great for it and willing to, who can't because they're stuck in the years of cycles of paperwork
Correct, and as cat pointed out, and I agree with, late stage is a no-no.
Don't clinics give out free protection?
Its even more interesting that areas with better hospitals have an earlier threshold of viability for premature babies, so if viability is what matters then your worth as a fetus is determined by socioeconomic status
Where the line should be drawn is a complex topic, which, I'm not versed enough in
The best thing is to just show a chart of fetal development and asking people which ones okay to kill. Very effective at eliminating that whole notion of "life begins at birth". Most normal people can watch a procedure and feel how wrong it is
I don't think life begins the moment you come out of the womb, but to say life starts the moment the first cell is formed goes a bit far
Whats so hard about just not having sex with someone you don't want to have kids with?
noones forcing you to have sex
I think very early stage abortions are fine, however, i personally side with pro life. One of the main things I see with more accessable abortions is a more care free life style that it promotes, erasing the burden of having to care for the thing you gave life to. While there are many reasons for an abortion, I personally think the whole its too much of a burden is a horrible excuse
abstaining and safe sex are the best ways to prevent conception in the first place... Its just we crave the dopamine rush, or whatever chemicals in the body are released.
Exactly, nobody is forcing you to have sex
I agree that not getting pregnant is better than abortion, yet clearly even people who do not want to children get pregnant. Abortion is a good way to prevent the pregnancy form happening and thereby possibly saving the child a lot of issues further down the line.
if you have a child, take care of it
don't shove it into a fucked up system just to appease your own morals whims
To make things more tragic, a lot of the women who never settle down grow up depressed and miserable after their ovaries dry up. They biologically NEED to have children. They end up substituting the baby with pets. After their looks wear off they will grow old and alone with no family. Sad
if you care about the child, care about it
And if you are not ready yet, abort
If those women can't properly take care of their children, I fully support them getting pets as "substitutes".
I also think abortions are horrible for men also,
while not more so on the emotional level, it does promote a more care free sex life
I have two friends of my age that had a abortions and they weren't in the position they are today if they wouldn't have aborted
not that we dont already have that...
I won't ever have to deal with this myself because my fiancé is prolife, but I couldnt imagine my gf have our baby killed
Both took the pill btw
Do people realize that the way that midterm abortions are done are disgusting? They rip that poor thing apart with tongs and then crush the skull
"I won't ever have to deal with this myself because I'm morally superior and would rather throw a child into a system proven to cause harm to him than having an abortion at an early stage before the fetus even has a brain because I'm morally superior"
And, I disagree with mid term too
We know it's fucked up, hence why I only support early stage
Germany has a limit at 12 or 14 weeks btw
Issue is drawing the line where "early" is, but, still
Yes I'd rather he/she have a chance to be adopted by a loving family than be dead
My only exception is when the mother will die from giving birth
nice
adopted by a loving family
After like multiple years spending time in foster care, likely mentally unstable
@shy gulch which is rare
Hoping it's actually a loving family
with modern medicine and surgery, its a very rare complication
Hey, ideally people just wouldn't have casual sex with strangers so adoption is compromise
I love how mostly man argue against abortions btw
Sexist ^
how is that sexist?
No? Just look at this channel? Nobody here can actually understand it
"I believe that if people have sex, they should deal with the consequences of their actions, but, imma just toss my issue in the system so I don't have to care about it"
Make it so people who toss their kids to the system are financially obligated to support them.
I did just talk about the men aspect of it, which is the already care free sex life getting even more care free...
Watch stance on abortion and using the foster care system as a dumpster change rela quick
I just have never heard a sane argument against abortions
so youre against abortion because its unfair to the child, although youre pro put them in the adoption system which is putting an unfair stress in their life?
That isn't influenced by religious believes
How do you know everyone here is male
If you don't want an abortion because of your believes, that's totally fine, that your choice. Just let others have their choice too
Because this is a community and we interact with each other?
everyone speaking right now afaik is a guy
Except cat, he is a cat.
To argue in american terms, having an abortion, is freedom of choice for the affect woman
It's hard to argue about choice when the people you're arguing against believe it's murder, it's a convenient way to dismiss the choice argument because clearly murder is unacceptable.
That's scientifically bullshit tho, so that argument can be dismissed
If it's early enough, its not murder
Is bacteria life
imho, people who have children and toss them into the system coz they can't have children should be castrated, change my mind
complex life? no
How many flys and ants have you killed you murder!
It's living
The statement "its not alive" is false
Are you gonna throw away all your cleaning products coz you don't wanna murder the precious bacteria
We can agree it's life. Is it a person? No.
who said it wasnt alive?
Stop conflating
This is so frustrating. If you fundamentally believe its not a life then what else can I say
It's a form of life, not even complex life. There's much more complex life you kill on a daily basis, unknowingly.
Those couple of cells in the early stages I don't consider human.
I am in utter shock from this statement
I dont even know what to say
We feel the same discussing with you
If you truly value "life" then you should feel more guilty about all the complex life you destroy on a daily basis instead of worrying about a couple cells.
Eat meat? Murderer. Fumigate? Genocide. Lol
I do agree with you that if the adoption system was not complete garbage and children would come out of it relatively okay, that could be a better option than abortion. But currently, no, not at all.
Im not equating human life to bugs.
What about cows?
I have met people who think its not life at all, my bad
Pigs
That's the thing. It's not human life.
How is it not human life
Heck, I even eat horses
It will develop into a person given enough time.
What happens if you leave it alone?
It's not human live yet
Until then, it's not a person.
Whats your criteria for a person
What's yours?
Conception
My definition is that human live forms sometime after 14 weeks
I think when we had this discussion before someone mentioned that after 20 weeks babies could start to feel pain. I don't know if this is true, but I'd say that's an adequate point to call it human.
If left alone to natural processes it will become a baby, its a human.
i dont get how you could consider anything a human life before it can even mildly think for itself
What about all the sperm you jack of then?
My toilet nut isnt gonna become a baby
But it could

That's how we feel about your points
Fortunately that's how the rest of the world feels about it too lol
My toilet nut can because a human...?
It's really what you define as natural processes there, because if the mother wouldn't eat or drink, that baby would also die. Is the mother eating and drinking a "natural process"?
Damn I committed genocide. Based.
If you would have a woman in reach to aim at 😂
If humans having sex is a naturally process, then your sperm not ending in a woman's womb would kill the possible babies that would have become from that sperm.
In that case, "if left to natural processes it would become a baby"
I just said I consider it life after conception
If left alone to natural processes it will become a baby, its a human.
Ok, if toilet nut doesn't count, what if I pull out early? I aborted a natural process too, right?
Heck, I can't even use a condom anymore then, because I prevented a natural process
Also, gotta love how religious ppl argue for natural processes, but don't believe in evolution
I'd say the seed it alive when it actually starts sprouting
You say conception, sounds like a lot of us say "the point at which it can perceive experiences"
Or rather at that point, the plant.
The sprouting is when it becomes an embryo
the baby is when the flowers develop
or rather, when roots appear its an embryo
well a seed is self sufficient from the beginning
These analogies make no sense
unlike a fetus
It's a plant, for all I care you chop all flowers of it
And when the stem appears and didnt come out of the surface
Toddlers arent self sufficient either
I am just happy that I don't live america
since when
Do not ping
Replies are pings?
- Literally, google
America, the land of freedom where people are against freedom
If you don't disable the ping yes
Ping
turn the @ to off
It is, with the option to send a ping
I wonder if this Georgia boycott will catch on. One can dream 😛
That is active by default cause dumcord
What we boycotting?
Ah yes
You... boycott an election?
If you can't win the system abolish it
I mean, you gotta admit it's cancerous af for people to run around telling people to move over to the state to vote
I assume it's not going to catch on, but it's basically just Republicans being discouraged to vote in the Georgia runoffs because it's rigged
We should have never allowed mail in ballots.
I mean, America wasn't a democracy anyway, without elections that is at least clearer /s
Why? Unless you can prove election fraud, why is more ways to vote a bad thing?
The issue isn't mail in
Giving people more ways to vote sounds like a great thing.
The issue is the blatent inability to secure the system to the point where both sides can stfu
Anyone arguing otherwise, in the absence of evidence of any election fraud, just sounds like they're trying to suppress votes.
I guess expats and military shouldn't vote then
Why? Isn't the self proclaimed leader of the free world able to hold a secure election? All other first world countries manage to do that btw
That's something I have yet to understand, what's the difference?
But if we're tossing out mail in votes, why not toss out absentee as well.
What's the difference between absentee and mail in?
To my knowledge there isn't much of a difference at all
absentee is "i'm gonna be out of state", afaik
generally for stuff like deployment
Yeah, but there is no further distinction as far as I know
So people living overseas, or military deployed overseas would request an absentee ballot. Where as in state people can request a mail ballot to vote by mail. Both go through the mail.
If you are against voting by mail, then it's reasonable to assume that you're also against absentee voting.
Why should only overseas people be entitled to vote by mail? People living in-state lead just as busy lives and some have just as difficult of a time voting in person.
The fate of your country is more important than how busy you are
You can always move /shrug
Why are elections on working days then?
If you believe so strongly it's that important, maybe election day should be a national holiday.
sure
Fight for that.
There's also the matter of polling stations being restricted in certain communities.
With limited hours, far away from certain communities etc
Basically every school is a polling station here
If I need to vote it's a 2 min walk, then there's no queue, then a 2 min walk back, even if it's on a workday I can just do it in the evening.
Some people living in communities where the only polling station is 50 miles away open only 5 hours a day
This is BY DESIGN
To suppress votes.
Mail in voting completely bypasses that and Republicans are mad about it.
American elections just make me sad
Because suddenly more black people and other disenfranchised voters can now... wait for it... vote.
American elections just make me sad
And now the grammar is wrong, well was worth I try I guess
I still don't see the argument against mail-in voting any way. Nobody's provided any substantial evidence of election fraud by mail-in votes.
And if mail in voting is somehow insecure, then so is absentee voting.
Can the solution is not to remove it, but to make sure it is secure
As every other country does it
It already is, as nobody has been able to prove it isn't.
Hm, I haven't looked at the status of Trump's election challenge lawsuits recently. I wonder how many more have been dismissed
gasp its so horrible that a voter voted legally from home vs standing around tons of people during a pandemic
there is one thing ill agree on, the whole postmarked by election day but received later was unnecessary
should just put a must be received by election day, your ass better mail it off at least 5 days before
Was that the votes in PA? Didn't those get tossed out?
no they tried, but didnt succeed.
a rule was changed to allow it, but they tried to say it shouldnt of been changed
Ah, had they succeeded, would it have changed the outcome? But yeah, I could get behind that.
well hard to know how many were "that late"
PA Mail in votes wasnt allowed to be counted towards end, even if it was received weeks before
so most was likely all received on time
That was a situation very specific to PA, right?
get them all in fast, have them all processed, so they can be quickly counted on election day, and problem solved, no delays
other states allowed it too, just they tried to challenge PA because it WASNT allowed before
NC allowed like 8 days after IF it was postmarked
by election day
i think a fair compromise is 5 day deadline to mail it in pre election day, gives post office time to get it there, this is all local mail, it doesnt take long to move this shit
and its priority too
Yeah but at the end of the day each state has the right to choose how they conduct their elections, as I understand with PA it was an issue of the state's Supreme Court basically "rewriting" legislation?
By extending the deadline
that was a fun catch up
Fun? I lost brain cells multiple times.
I suppose if the right ones die off I could get rewired to imagine this was fun.
oh, i meant "fun"
Voter registration is already secure. Again prove it isn't. The problem with voter ID in America is that the process would be politicized. Some people would have easy access, some wouldn't.
On paper it sounds nice. In practice, it would be abused to suppress votes.
We already know in places where some form of voter ID is implemented that it disproportionately affects minorities and the impoverished.
America isn't every other country.
America would need a system of healthcare that works for America, but it wouldn't be impractical to model such a system. But the ACA is an example of how trying to do healthcare "like other countries" doesn't work for America, too.
do some states not require you to have a drivers license or whatever to vote?
then why do I show the person who gives me the ticket my driver license
do I not need to do that?
ok thank you that's what i was looking for
This is how we have data on how voter ID laws affect different communities.
Because some states do have them.
and this is texas so Strict Photo ID lol
Yes Texas has had some of its voter ID laws stricken down, too.
For being blatantly discriminatory.
They refused some forms of photo ID while allowing others. The result was that it was much harder to vote for certain people, such as college students and poor people.
We have this thing called voter registration. It works great.
Unless you can prove otherwise. (You can't, nobody has to date)
did you know, you cant just randomly go to multiple polling places and vote at each one? gasp, its like the systems designed to ensure that 1 person gets 1 vote!
your information of where your expected to vote is at your registered polling place on election date, and if you voted early, should already have removed you from those records. if you show up at multiple places, theyll be like "we dont have a ballot for you"
and please please educate me on evidence of large scale voting as someone else. Surely when that person goes to vote and told theyve already voted that wouldnt be raising all kinds of alarms....
Voting for dead relatives is the thing that can happen, but guess what, thats individuals being passionate about their choice and nothing to do with systemic voter fraud! and happens on both sides. Typically elderly vote republican so more likely to benefit republicans there
and improving the dead voting scenario doesnt require ID's, it requires better government data processing that death records can instantly notify voting databases and have them removed
It's time republicans put their fucking money where their mouth is about less government and more state control:
https://norml.org/blog/2020/12/02/more-act-approved-by-house-rules-committee/
Lets see who the hypocrites are!
Members of the House Rules Committee have advanced the Marijuana Opportunity, Reinvestment, and Expungement (MORE) Act, HR 3884, which removes marijuana from the federal Controlled Substances Act -- thereby eliminating the existing conflict between state and federal marijuana laws. The legislation is expected to be considered on the floor of the...
I dont see anything wrong with that bill
🇹 🇷 🇺 🇲 🇵
Stay civil pls
Oki
they told me to come here for capitalism bad
no capitals in that sentence so your statement checks out
xd
Was really hoping I wouldn't need to see more images of that smug teen, but here we are.
Lol
Well, it's good news at least
Trump put a bunch of people loyal to him in top positions in various agencies
And they're all failing so far
What, I don't mean what you posted. 😛
I wondered what you meant by teen
Are you talking about the kid who shot and killed people with a gun he didn't and couldn't own and got posted bail?
Speaking of textbook systemic racism..
god please no
Nah, this teen is the one with the MAGA hat in DC
I might be out of the loop on that one
iirc there was some native group there looking for someone to argue with and that teen and his friends were looking for someone to heckle then another native man got in between them and tried to lecture the kids on just walking away from those kind of situations
Ended up with a picture of some native folks yelling at this smirking teen wearing a MAGA hat
that situation wasnt a good moment for the left, the left spewed a lot of false information around that
Eh, there was a lot of spin but I don't think there was anything outright false
I know the lawsuits have been settled but the settlements are private so who knows what happened there
its been a long time so i dont remember full details, but i remember actually kinda siding with the right on that one a bit
the native group acted badly
He might have received millions in exchange for not making them look bad or he might have been told to accept the token payment (contracts have to be "equal" to be enforceable) so he didn't waste tons on legal fees
Oh yeah, and that's the spin part
No one was talking about the original group, only the one that intervened and was talking to the kids
Even though the original group started it
The kids took the bait
I think I checked out around the point I heard the kids were there to attend an anti-womens-rights rally.
Who needs equality anyway?
Certainly not women! /s

I find it odd how judges can order a president to restore an executive order
that just doesnt sound like a good idea
That bill is dead in the Senate, unless they plan on amending it and sending it back to the House.
do you know understand how separation of powers works?
literally go back to middle school social studies
me?
yes
McConnell is definitely going to take issue with some of the text in that bill.
A judge is meant to uphold law, not take whatever executive does and run with it
The judicial also upholds constitutionality.
yes
I'm not familiar with the topic at hand, but I assume it had to do with something being unconstitutional, maybe 😛
judge orders trump to restore daca
Cool, and unless the Supreme Court steps in, sounds like they made the right call.
They could if they wanted to
I dont see it as likely that would be added back in, that is a very dangerous move
But I don’t think they will
On Friday, the judge said that invalidated the memo Wolf had issued in July suspending DACA for new applications and reducing how long renewals were valid from two years down to one year.```
I assume this is it?
Maybe don't act unlawfully, I guess.
Is daca a law?
what was unlawful? I'm not seeing much, ill see about pulling up what the judges had to say
Sounds like Wolf at the time the memo was issued was not in a legal position to enact those changes.
So apparently its meant to be some line of succession in how positions are setup
Seems like, and Wolf was improperly appointed.
Therefore he doesn't have the authority do what he did.
Again, seems like a procedural issue, not necessarily the judicial branch overturning executive orders.
so technically its restoration because some guy didnt go through the proper channels
Right
I'm sure if a legal successor did it, it would be fine.
But 11 days later, Wolf issued a memorandum cutting renewal permits from two years to one and blocking all new applications.
That prompted a November ruling by Garaufis saying that Wolf was not lawfully serving as DHS acting secretary when he issued the changes "because the Department of Homeland Security failed to follow its order of succession, as it was lawfully designated under the Homeland Security Act."```
That sums it up quite nicely.
DHS should learn to follow the law. 🙂
Nice, guess we can expect to see the DHS website updated soon:
Court documents said that DHS has until Monday to post a public notice "displayed prominently on its website and on the websites of all other relevant agencies, that it is accepting first-time requests for consideration of deferred action under DACA."
From Wikipedia, lel
(unlawful)
well thats going to be a shitshow
On August 25, President Trump announced that he would nominate Wolf to be confirmed by the Senate as the permanent Secretary of Homeland Security. The nomination was formally submitted to the Senate on September 10. The same day, FEMA Administrator Pete Gaynor, who was highest official in the proper Acting Secretary succession order, issued a memo designating the same order of succession that was intended to be established by McAleenan, in order to make Wolf the proper Acting Secretary. Wolf then issued a memo reaffirming his previous actions as Acting Secretary. However, on November 13, DHS admitted in a court ruling that Gaynor's memo had apparently been issued about an hour before the Senate nomination had been made, which may affect its legality. This administration is a shitshow.
We really are fortunate that this administration is so incompetent. Things could've been much worse.
we really are. watching a slow motion coup attempt like, terrifying to think what it would be like if anyone competent was involved
DACA was not a law, it was an executive order since the House refused to pass the desired law.
DREAM was the bill/law.
Regarding the legality, all that has to happen is they now reissue the memo.
I'm not sure they can yet, as Wolf is still unlawfully in his position.
Once they resolve that, sure. They can reissue the memo.
This is apparently the third judge to rule that Chad Wolf was unlawfully appointed. DHS is fucked.
ok, anyone in these states, vote these fuckers out!
Reps. Cheri Bustos and Dan Lipinski of Illinois, Henry Cuellar of Texas, Conor Lamb of Pennsylvania, Chris Pappas of New Hampshire and Collin Peterson of Minnesota.
im glad this vote happened to finally get fuckers on the record
wat they do doe
dems who voted against legalizing weed
well decrmininilizing
i guess its slightly diff
not all dems support that 
yeah and fuck them, vote em out
what if theyre kept in by the votes of those who dont support it 
hard considering most of society supports it
weed is like the largest unifying bipartisan agenda we have at the people level
I believe popular support for decriminalization is 2 to 1 or something crazy. It has insanely high support.
and those who dontare prob hypocritcal bitches who drink alchohol
on that note, idk if its legal here actually
you cant drink alchohol and be against weed or else your a hypocrite
doubt it
and i speak this as someone whos never even used weed lol
Smoking cigarettes and drinking alcohol are undeniably worse than consuming cannabis.
it is still illegal here 😔
a lifetime of being exposed to cigarettes stigmatizes smoking form to me heh
Personally I'm taking an extended break from weed, because I have an unhealthy relationship with substances in general, but that isn't to say it's weed's fault. It could happen with smoking or drinking, I have a hard time moderating so I stay away 😛
But I support everyone's right to consume.
id much rather be around a hardcore stoner than alchoholic
100%
how many weed related domestic abuse cases do you hear about compared to booze (i actually cant recall ever hearing of one)
I haven't heard of any.
wish dems couldof taken senate and finally got this important bill passed 😦
McConnell definitely isn't gonna bring it to a vote. He isn't even going to bother trying to amend it, regardless of what the bill says.
He's not going to give Democrats this win.
if trump was smart he would of took this as a win for him and he def would of won reelection then
I believe Trump has it within his power to demand the rescheduling of controlled substances, his executive authority to do so is baked into the Controlled Substances Act.
well then biden would too, but that wont solve the expunging issue
lol unless biden can mass pardon
Right. The bill tackles that and also redirects funding from taxes for some other things too, which I'm sure Republicans will take issue with.
oh man "bring me a pardon for every weed charge" > bidens signing papers his entire term
Shouldn't be too hard to do a pardon for every non-violent weed offense.
But I'm sure the prison industry wouldn't be very happy about that.
Actual legalized slavery.
in some cases maybe, but many of them want to work
The 13th amendment actually legalizes slavery as a form of punishment, which is fucked too.
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
Quite a few plantations were turned into prisons too, actually.
mainly difference of how one ended up there, slavery = forced, prison = punishment
afk running to store
private prisons have made a living on the whole war on drugs for a long time, It really needs to end for cannabis
However, I am not against prisons doing manual labor as long as the prisoner consents and gets some benefits out of it, a lower prison sentence in return
But yeah, I would like to see better education when it comes to cannabis, along with other substances rather than the scare tactic
Court ruled that Trump himself can end it. Just Wolf can't.
SCOTUS made the ruling on Trumps ability to, not the Federal judge.
Cabinet members are the one carrying out executive orders
I'm guessing an illegitimate acting secretary wouldn't be authorized even if Trump told him to do it
Which sets up an interesting precedent for Biden if McConnell maintains power and refuses to confirm cabinet members, potentially.
This issue seems to be specifically about an improper line of succession, though.
So as long as that's taken care of, it's all green
Even if it's not a confirmed cabinet member
Yeah there is a contingency for this situation though, the next in line assumes the duties for the sake of compliance with EO's.
But definitely interesting in Biden's case since most people would be chosen by Trump when he gets in.
To my knowledge there's nothing wrong with having acting, unconfirmed department heads, it just has to be proper which in Wolf's case it seems it wasn't.
So DHS is effectively crippled I guess until they fix that
Also the specific judge has argued that yea, constitutional experts/scholars are saying the real issue is they circumvented process by waiting for him to be confirmed by the Senate for another position before nominating him. So he was confirmed as under secretary and assigned secretary on the same day.
Yeah, they should just put him as nominated, and promote the second in line to acting temporarily.
Not sure why they haven't sorted it out yet, maybe just because it's a lame duck period
Pete Gaynor should be the next in line I think.
The other issue with the judges order is it's unlawful as well.. since he's ordering an unlawfully elected official (as he see's it) to do something only a lawfully elected official can do.
Right, the argument isn't that Trump doesn't have the authority to rescind or change DACA. Just that he can't have someone unlawfully appointed do it
Correct
In conservative circles they are spinning it as activists judges though lol
But the judge is ordering the unlawfully elected official to issue a memo to rescind the original memo, which he's saying he can't lawfully issue memos.
The whole thing is a clusterfuck.
In my opinion.
I don't think it's rescind the memo itself, but directing DHS to restore things back to the way they were.
because the memo is illegitimate
Yeah, but I'm 99% sure he's directed Wolf to do things as Secretary. Maybe I read it wrong or the article was er, paraphrasing.
If that were the case then yeah that would be pretty amusing.
I don't know why Wolf is still even acting secretary lol
Maybe it would've made sense for the judge to enforce the proper line of succession
Looks like the judge instructed the DHS (not necessarily Wolf) to restore DACA
Not sure how that works 😛
Lol "activist judge" Chase Jennings, a DHS spokesperson, criticized Friday's order but said the department would comply with it, pending an appeal. "DHS wholly disagrees with this decision by yet another activist judge acting from his own policy preferences. Judge Garaufis's latest decision, similar to his earlier inaccurate ruling, is clearly not sound law or logic," Jennings said in a statement to CBS News. "We will abide by this decision while we work with (the Justice Department) on next steps to appeal."
The Homeland Security Act of 2002 seems to clearly outline the proper order of succession, maybe DHS should've followed the law 😛
https://www.gao.gov/products/B-331650 Upon Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen's resignation on April 10, 2019, the official who assumed the title of Acting Secretary had not been designated in the order of succession to serve upon the Secretary's resignation. Because the incorrect official assumed the title of Acting Secretary at that time, subsequent amendments to the order of succession made by that official were invalid and officials who assumed their positions under such amendments, including Chad Wolf and Kenneth Cuccinelli, were named by reference to an invalid order of succession. We have not reviewed the legality of other actions taken by these officials; we are referring the matter to the Inspector General of DHS for review.
Overall, we rate Townhall Right Biased and Questionable based on consistent one-sided reporting that always favors the right and numerous failed fact checks.
townhall is as far as it gets from legitimate, unbiased news.
mcconnell won't let another one pass unless companies get immunity from covid lawsuits
Dems really need to win the Georgia runoffs
both mcconnell and her "decided" to block corona relief
they just did it for different reasons
what unpassable things
do you have an article from a reputable source that states these things too?
or some shortened version of the bill i could look at
idc if it's biased, as long as it's reputable
you can be biased and reputable
spreading fake news is what makes you untrustworthy
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-03-23/airlines-would-get-37-billion-in-grants-in-pelosi-s-virus-plan | for the airliners one i'd imagine
oh hey
they put it as other matters in the text
very cool
yea idk kinda lame thing to do if it's that simple
That's fun
WATCH: Video footage from #Georgia shows suitcases filled with ballots pulled from under a table AFTER supervisors told poll workers to leave room and 4 people stayed behind to keep counting votes
have fun deboonking
Oooor we let authorities do that?
Because you know, that's what they do
If something is wrong, they will find it, if it's not, them there is nothing wrong
Archived in case it gets taken down by the terrible Google corporation
Kek
Just had time to read into that
Seems fine
Then why do they plaster it under every video about the election
Thats not how people are interpreting it
Its extremely misleading
AP doesn't decide it. AP looks at all the data and says there is no way trump can win
It's probability
Need I remind you what the media said in 2016
Those were predictions, that's very different
how
Prediction based on pre-vote polls are not the same as calling the election based on actual vote reports. Do you truly not know the difference? I'm sure we can explain to you as necessary
I just think its gonna be amusing if/when this is over and the 2000 election happens again
*****President Al Gore
Then the media will go back to the same crap they did for the last 4 years, like Russia Russia Russia
Why am I even bothering
Seriously why do you bother? You get your information from media companies that I think are malicious and evil, and will do anything to push their agenda.
Anything I say you will think is false and any fact-checking you do I will think is false
You're really sounding like a low effort troll with this. You're going to need to try harder to compete with minecraft community trolls.
I'm not a troll
Yes, one side is thinking and believing and the other side it looking for facts
I have a hard time believing companies that pushed the story that Trump hired hookers to piss on Obamas bed
Or that drinking milk is a sign of white supremacy
Or that 👌 is a hate symbol
Or the whole lie that Trump hates mexicans and called them rapists when he clearly was talking about MS-13 gang members, who are indeed, rapists and murderers.
What about that time they showed the footage of war in the middle east and it was actually just recordings of a gun range
What you are doing wrong is speaking about the media, when these mistakes (intential or not) were made many different outlets for many different reasons
Talking about the big media just makes you sound like a conspiracy theorist
Conspiracy Theorist was a term coined by the CIA to attempt to delegitimize anyone who criticizes the government
No?...
Theres plenty of theories pushed by the media that arent considered conspiracies
like Russiagate
even though it 100% is
You do realize that the term conspiracy theory exists outside of the US? Lol
Yes
The internet also exists outside the US despite the fact that our military invented it
What's Russiagate? There's multiple Russia-related stories, I want to be sure I'm responding to the correct one for you.
The entire concept of Russia rigging our election
They didn't rig the election
"Big Media is just a conspiracy"
Yes Trump won because Russian people posted boomer memes on facebook 
RIGHT BIAS These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may da...
That stuff, if done right, has an undeniable impact on public opinion
Not because of a populist movement where americans are tired of their jobs being outsourced to foreign countries that use slave labor to create cheap products
Completely smugly undermines the entire movement the guy has created
Ah, yes, the movement to destroy America's reputation
Majority of Trump's supporters don't give a shit about his mean tweets
If you don't need middle eastern oil, why is murica always invading them?
So we don't use our own oil of course
Because of our corrupt military and government
So when everyone else runs out we still have ours
This isn't news to anyone here. We know there's 70 million people who don't care about racism or sexism as long as the right people are hurt. 😛
Trump isn't racist nor sexist.
He only says racist or sexist things, right?
That doesn't make someone a racist or sexist, right?
😂 😂 😂 😂
I seem to recall Trump explaining how he could just grab women in their genitals without permission. Did I imagine that?
Man, I am so glad trump is gone in a few weeks and the world can go back to normal
What do you mean when you say he's racist? When he calls Warren "Pocahontas"? Thats mocking how she grifted off of a lie about being "Native american" her entire life to take advantage of programs for them
Maybe 4 years of Biden will do you good sir, it'll allow you to see that trump wasn't that great of a president
Unless you're so deep into this there is no way to pull yourself out
Ill see it go back to Bush and Obama days. More endless wars, more tax increases, more jobs and production going to China. Can't wait
I will see the media write fluff pieces all day on Biden because hes their guy
I mean, Pelosi already has showed signs that she's considering that for biden
and then we'll have Kamala, who literally pulled out before she flopped in her homestate or whatever it was
Kamala the prosecutor. Kamala "Locks people in prison for non-violent drug offenses" Harris
Mike "denied that smoking kills in goddamn 2001" Pence. Are we doing weirdly long nickname day today? I thought we did that on Mondays.
Kamala and Biden created the terrible system that progressives complain about
Donald "grab them by the pussy" trump
Oddly, EK Moon skipped right over this when they claimed Trump isn't sexist. Weird 🤔
It's mobile typing time
Quick, find an image of Trump tweeting something racist
Trump was explaining how groupies let you do whatever you want when youre rich and powerful. They let you grab them by the pussy. He didnt say "I love molesting women who dont want to be touched"
He's not a progressive, but he's the one heavily responsible for a bill which threw a disproportional number of the black community into the jail system over trivial crimes such as possession, not to mention his random comments over his 47 odd years against the POC community, and the LGBT community...
Bout fucking time
I mean, locker room talk and all, I bet a fair chunk of us have said that there was some girl in our year or whatever who was hot
his wording was defo in the creepy area, but, I find it hard to hold against him
By the way, the Proud Boys aren't a white supremist group. So tired of people saying that. Their leader is literally a black cuban
Oh biden is definitely not perfect
But he's better than trump, and maybe he learned something in the past years
And at least he's not ignoring scientist
"In our year" - I'm sorry hold up. This wasn't said as a teenager. It stops being acceptable then and he was well outside that age range.
He was marveling at what groupies let you do. Guess we also gotta cancel every rock group ever
Can we at least agree on them being neo-fascist?
No we can't
Ahahaha okay.
No we can't they're just a reasonable group of people
Def nothing wrong, they have a black Cuban as a leader
It was founded by Gavin Mcinnes, who is basically a right leaning libertarian. He left because he wanted to focus on his family. And you're seriously gonna make me cringe if you claim hes also somehow some ethnonationalist
Who on the right isn't a fascist to you
Alright, I lack the time and patience to continue discussing this with somebody who clearly fell out of a portal from an alternate dimension where things are very different, including acceptability of strawmanning and factuality. Talk to y'all later!
bye nerd
?kick @shy gulch obvious troll
EK | Moon#0832 was kicked | obvious troll
why do yall try lol
I try to understand such ppl
Can only fight the right wing if you know why they think so backwards
I second this statement. I have met people in real life just like this, but they have usually stormed off after a single wild belief is countered with fact so it's hard to continue understanding.
Lost causes? Possibly. But I still try to be optimistic that we can pull people back from the bizarro world they've been taught, within a generation.
what do you guys think of maximum age for voting and lowering minimum age for voting
Maximum? No thanks. Minimum? What would you say it should be?
If we have a minimum, we should have a maximum
If a 16 year old can't be trusted to vote, why would you trust a 90 year old?
Who never will notice the consequences of their actions
The current generation of kids thinks deeply about our future
They notice that we can't continue like this
i couldn't think of an accurate minimum
In germany, it's 18 for federal, but 16 for city
I'm only 18 and haven't even voted yet
And hopefully we will lower federal to 16 too
in Canada of course it's different
Brain doesn't have to be developed for voting?!
I don't think that's a valid way of putting it
If you make voting depending of the healthiness of your brian, we def need a max limit
LOL
¯_(ツ)_/¯
I also think if you're able to operate a vehicle; own a firearm, and serve your country but not be allowed to vote
it seems a little unrelated but the terms are there
some guns in some states
Only in murica
i believe it's limited to something like shotguns and maybe long rifles
i'm not a gun enthusiast so i could be wrong
still powerful
A 16 year old here can't even own a taser
a minimum age just allows for more people to think ahead of time in my opinion
lol
14?!?!!
well there you go i guess i was right lol
Majority has no minimum ._.
I don't think owning them at 8 is the bad part
but you can't purchase them
Oh that makes it totally better
it's about having them uneducated about what a gun is and can do
"Let's give a child a life-taking device" is not a bad part? 😄
Luckily 0 states don't allow civilians to have guns at all
Well you do have a point there
That's almost 1
Murica, where a child is allowed to posses a gun but an adult can't posses a bit of weed
Getting close to all states /s
You do have a point, at least fully locked an unlocked education with supervision
if the firearm is fully secured, and supervised by a mentally sufficient individual, unloaded, and locked etc isn't the worst but that's probably 5% of the parents
even then it might spark shitty ideas
I should add: using gun for sport is a thing here, and you can do it below 18 (don't know the min), but you don't own the gun and it can't leave the training facility
So there is always professional supervison
Parents aren't that
The laws for stuff like guns are different, e.g. ^ is the same in a few states
Agreed.
The way i see it is that the US is more like the EU
You have this big government bs in charge of a few dozen smaller governments
Which, looking at the state of the EU, is not a compliment for the US, lol
it's why stuff like weed legaility was weird, as some states would allow it, but, it's still technically illegal federally, just, feds are generally not in a position they can enforce shit unless they look at you
I'm not saying it is, lol
imho, it's the uber elitism, I lean both left and right on varying issues, and even over here in the UK, you look at the tory party and you're a piece of trash
Our labour mayor over here just got out on bail for witness intimidation and basically sketchy business activities
LOL
corbyn is basically semi-suspended from the party due to his what I understand as basically inaction towards the racism in his own party, etc
It's not only elitism
It's the black and white, left or right thing
You gotta choose a side, and then that side owns you and you agree on all issues
You have some labour member who got pulled over after some pigs entered the license plate in wrong, and all of a sudden all pigs are racist
That's what I mean by elitism
We need to get back into a modus where we talk about issues and problems, not opposing sides
The stance that one side is morally superior and anybody else who believes otherwise is basically an -ist or whatever
Ah I see
too much division
Well, I called ppl right wing idiots before, but that's because they subscribe the a side which has some views I can't tolerate. If they would instead get back to a issue level, I wouldn't mind having a proper discussion.
Like, ppl in here might put me into the left corner, and I def share similar views, but i am not afraid to call out if something is bullshit, no matter the "side".
Kek, last federal election in germany i voted for a "right side" neo liberal party 😂 😂
I lean left in some areas and right in others, so, I'm a "fun" person
What a dum choice but yeah
In the US that's tricky because one of the parties is in favor of stripping women's rights more than they are now, actively works to disenfranchise minorities, ran in 2016 on a policy of preventing muslim immigrants from entering the country, etc.
I totally respect that people can have a wide spectrum of viewpoints on a variety of issues but here we have a political party that's like a cartoon villain in many ways. 😛
Thats the thing with two party systems
Yeah, it sucks.
Afaik, it wasn't muslims in general but muslims from trouble hotspots who aren't citizens
Which, yea, iffy, but, given the rise of attacks in places like france at the time, I can see why people wanted it
No it’s just Muslims. Most of the attackers from 9/11 were from Saudi Arabia and they got nothing.
I’d say the majority of Islamic terrorism as we know it grew out of Saudi Arabia and Iran but only one of those states received any sort of punitive action because of it.
If anything those states are being supported by the U.S. too my knowledge aren't they the biggest consumer in firearm sales?
and oitehr stuff
Saudi Arabia is being rewarded because of it, yes
Narrowing it down to "Still target muslims, just the 'bad ones'" doesn't really help any argument in its favor
And it’s because of oil that the US wants to get their hands on
Well, I think the entire thing is BS, but, the world defo needs to be better at dealing with stuff like harmful people, international and domestic
It's kinda scary how often you hear that some attacker was on some watchlist for literally years or something
Someone has to aid me in the Alex Jones scene, I still believe him on certain topics for some reason 
that water man
Don’t
Smth smth remember when the CIA payed osama bin laden? 😂
Do not believe anything Alex Jones says
I try not too but I go open minded accepting everything he says for some reason
That man
not literally everything but I go into open-mindedly
I heard he's kookoo so that's another reason not too.
I don't want to play slippery-slope games but where do you want to shift the line between "was on a watchlist and we couldn't catch them actually doign something in time" and "we prosecuted them for thought-crime"? How do we prevent acts while still preserving rights?
His point in the twin towers not having to fall because of metal beams or some shit
(using thought crime as an extreme, not implying you're suggesting it)
I tried finding points against his argument couldn't find much
It's probably me in a little bit of self-denial
Some sources have alleged that the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) had ties with Osama Bin Laden's al-Qaeda and its "Afghan Arab" fighters when it armed Mujahideen groups to fight the Soviet Union during the Soviet–Afghan War.
About the same time as the "Soviet deployment" into Afghanistan, the United States began giving several hundred millio...
Not trying to defend them but that’s different
Well, that's part of the issue as to where you draw the line; But, I'd argue that if you're making threats upon people and then go out to obtain weaponry, etc, you know
ofc, there are some complexities into how they come into weapons and such, so, there is defo a huge ass slippery slope of tryna balance rights between preventing this shit from happening in the first place
Yeah, it's an awful squiggly line we need to draw here
That’s uniting against a common enemy. The soviets were trying to invade Afghanistan and take it over. The CIA was working to protect state sovereignty.
By funding terrorists
Well, yea, but there was still a cashflow, which, "correct, but not at the relevant timeframe for the claim"
god knows on the specifics, too much there to follow for my brain
Basically, the CIA is responsible for the whole fucking mess in the middle east
no real surprise there
I remember how the democratic leader of iran was called, but the US basically removed the only democratic leader that whole region ever had
Eh, we have to go back further to WWII don't we? For all the awful borders and such?
The place was fucked
the CIA just came in with a huge stirring spoon for their own whims
(I mean yeah, CIA has caused lots of stuff, no denial there, but with the middle east specifically I view them more as a mid-game player than starting lineup on the screwups there)
Cia came to fight soviet union and to fight for oil
Remember the alleged weapons of mass destruction? 😂
from what I recall, "the enemy of your enemy is your friend", so they basically propped up osama, which ended up causing them to turn into a shithouse too big for their own good, and they they popped him as soon as they got what they wanted and just started stirring again
And left him with bunch of money and weapons and a deeply rooted hatred for the US 😂
And I mean, if you look at what happens, I can totally understand why the collective middle east hates the west so much
And hey, as we speak, turkey is invading syria and nobody gives a shit
Wooooo
Erdogan trying to do a genocide to kurds
nobody generally cares about stuff unless it's politically expedient or affects them
Erdogan is developing to be a real problem
He was a problem in lybia, he is a problem in syria, he is a problem in artsakh
He's also stiring up shit in the aegean
Oh and blackmailing the EU with refugees
Fuuuuuun
Let's continue on a more light hearted topic
(thread)
so untastefully clever
using a trigger for his base and calling fox news worse than that trigger
trump sucks
I don't understand that last response
"why is there an algorithm?"
"well, in programming, an algorithm is just a set of steps. It just means code, which you need to run any software."
"there shouldn't be an algorithm, it should just run simple calculations"
seems to have missed the entire point
unless I'm mis-reading and they're just claiming something that's untrue from no real information?
that latter might be the case
i get the feeling they're trying to say that x candidate's votes are worth x% while y candidate is worth y%
it's on a thread about trying to fact-check someone getting a Dominion machine and putting in equal votes and discovering Biden had a 26% lead
apparently that was all made-up, but I read the reply tweets anyway
"lessons on success and persuasion"?
oop we can't find the fraud lets find the next thing to complain about
no
I remember it being a funny read with good advice
he probably just takes stuff from the book and then tries to apply it to a modern context or something
It's likely just a spin or similar
I might be mixing it up with Social Engineering: The Art of Human Hacking
Or his own take on how to achieve the results
Ye
Anti-gay Hungarian politician József Szájer resigns after being caught attending 25-man orgy in breach of COVID-19 rules
Hard to understand gay homophobes. Are they also self-hating?
they're basically just closeted morons, imho
Seems to me they'd be much happier if they just embraced it. Why go to a gay orgy while depriving the rights of millions of other LGBTQ?
The now that fighting for those rights would be political suicide
It's the side thing, subscribe to a side, gotta subscribe to all their policies
Unless you are man enough to stand up
someone i know once described that type of homophobia as "i'm-a-homo-phobia" which i think is accurate.
With the help of viewers at home, John tries to get to the bottom of an important mystery.
Connect with Last Week Tonight online...
Subscribe to the Last Week Tonight YouTube channel for more almost news as it almost happens: www.youtube.com/lastweektonight
Find Last Week Tonight on Facebook like your mom would: www.facebook.com/lastweekton...
It's beautiful
I'm impressed r/Libertarian is handling the election results more gracefully than r/Conservative.
Maybe the conservative sub is being overrun by former The_Donald people when the sub got banned 😛
I’m curious what the_donald got banned for lmao
"the media"
it's really, really easy to attack a nebulous concept that doesn't actually conform to reality
"the media" is quite literally everything, or it could be one specific outlet, or nothing, depending on who you're talking to
it's also incredibly difficult to defend nebulous concepts like that
83% of people are correct-ish in that most media outlets have a bias
but "the media" is not biased, because "the media" does not exist
it's a disingenuous attack on a concept rather than anything corporeal
clearly a large amount of Trump's audience is confused about "the media" then, basket
reading Twitter replies and some comments in here suggest that they conflate a single news outlet with "the media" aka. what they intend to mean "everything"
I see constant attacks on "the media" where it's a single source (possibly even accidentally) mis-representing something
the whole point of the whole "the media" thing is to attack a concept that's difficult to defend
it's the world's largest hasty generalization fallacy
to be fair, the election is also entirely hasty generalization
the "rigged election" anyway
seems par for the course with Trump's base
i mean what can you say
they probably exist
and maybe we have seen them
but i doubt they're working with us lol
we seem to be a little too self destructive right now
The Fairness Doctrine was killed off so right wing radio could be a thing
dont know if it was a joke but lmao
mixing reputable and tabloids...
yes a lot of what a tabloid might post might be "factual", but its still trash
I think the Fairness Doctrine was killed off the same way line sharing rules were, the existing players pointed at cable and said "but they don't have to!" and the FCC's answer wasn't to make cable follow the same rules but to get rid of the rules
Also trust me people hated on NBC and CBS and ABC in the 70s and 80s too they just didn't have right wing radio and the internet to spread their bullshit so you don't know about all the ways they were "wrong" or selective in what they reported on
Nixon certainly made his feelings known
With the talk of repealing section 230, I wonder who that hurts more 😛
The crypto-fascists on distributed services and tor might lose their homeserver but not their social graph as they hop from takedown to takedown
Twitter will turn in to an ad and blogging platform for celebrities
It'll make it harder for their message to spread to new people though so maybe them?
Trump threatening to veto the defense authorization bill over section 230 is so good. I hope he does. No more money for the DoD, please.
Actually, has it already gone through both houses? 😦
Looks like the Senate amended it, so back to the House then?
Also my man Bernie, at least you tried: The Senate voted 23-77 against a proposal by Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) to reduce the budget by $74 billion.
I thought it made it through both houses with a veto-proof majority
It passed the House, but the Senate amended it I think
Like, he can veto it but they could just vote it again