#M1 Simping
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
lol
Ok
Why is 1tb storage 400€
Extra
for the same reason its $300 extra for dell laptops, because oem pricing is stupid
true, but dell’s also being shitty here
It literally doesn't matter what the performance delta is for M1 machines, because they're stuck on OSX and therfor only run what works on it + Rosetta.
It's still a Macbook and stuck being a Macbook.
I could just get good 32 gb ram chips for a desktop
m1 thinkpad when
For just a bit more
besides, u can’t even upgrade ram and storage in a MacBook if I’m not mistaken
Y'all out here comparing which makes better fruit cake when most people want chocolate.
so there’s no way to avoid the 200 quid 8gb ram upgrade
Or any laptop that isn't framework really
2 threads vs 1 thread is not an equivalent argument
not true
run 2 threads on both chips, see which one wins
with the dell laptop u can just buy a 8gb ram stick for 30 bucks at the most
@stable shadow Hyperthreading
it's using the hardware of 1 core more efficiently.
@stable shadow A good handful of Lenovo and Dell machines have upgradable RAM.
No such thing as "everything" anymore.
Framework
CPU has been soldered in laptops for a decade.
unless you're looking only at ultra thin devices, there are loads with upgradeable sodimm memory
U can upgrade everything
Framework has soldered CPU.
also your own chart shows that alderlake is the only thing thats actually faster 1t vs 1t than the m1, at best zen3 ties it on the desktop
Replacing the CPU means replacing the mainboard.
and in laptops nobodys close
macbooks aren’t budget devices, a 512gb MacBook Air (lower end, 7 core model) + 16gb ram would set u back 1400
do any laptops have a cpu socket?
But can be done tho
or are cpu sockets too bulky?
plenty of older thinkpads even have new motherboards, keyboards and oled screens available for them
@stable shadowyes, just like I can swap out the mainboard in my Lenovo.
Cool
Geekbench is also heavily biased towards Apple devices, this has been known for a long time
@stable shadow Anything socketed on laptops is reserved for overkill "gaming" desktop replacements or workstation-class machines.
This is even an older test with forced single-thread (no hyperthreading)
@sleek scaffold its still ahead in passmark and at the top of the pile in cinebench too
some but nobody buys them cause they’re stupid and run extremely hot + have insanely bad battery life
and cinebench is made using software intel designed, embree thingy
ya tigerlake gets close to the m1 single thread, but since they are only quad cores they get beaten super badly multi threaded
yes, they're not really laptops but more "desktop replacements" or "we need a powerful computer but need to be able to move it around a few times a day"
so you can replace keyboard, keycaps, motherboard, battery, display, webcam, trackpad, red tit, casing, and then of course, storage and RAM
IO is pretty much the only thing you can't modify since it's built onto the motherboard, but docks are available for them too.
Noice
Wasn't a fight and I never said @stable shadow was wrong. People just need to learn how to prove a facts rather than just blindly stating things
to prove what i said i would have had to link every laptop being sold on the entire internet and compare it in depth to the macbook
if u compare the macbook air (after upgrades) to equally priced legion 3070 laptops ($1599 if I’m not mistaken), it’d be beaten in any gpu heavy task
then do it
its far easier for someone to link a specific laptop that actually beats the macbook, than for me to link every laptop that doesnt, or actually its not that easy since none of them currently do 😂
Welp u can now do a project
@stable shadowAll I have to do is tell you to run a game that doesn't translate well to M1 to disprove "best" , because best is relative.
Passmark is also way more synthetic than Cinebench, the multithreaded passmark scores really suck even for the 10-core model. CPUs with less cores beat the multithreaded performance
Again, benchmarks and the proverbial dick-waving contest doesn't matter when the laptop doesn't run your workload.
lol
Tbh he is right
If u have the best hardware
m1 max with blender 3.1 beta or whatever it is is apparently comprable at rendering to an RTX 3080 using optix, the beta test results are too new and nobodys done a comprehensive comparison yet, but its looking crazy now that cycles X has native metal support, so thats neat
M1s are heavily limited (and becoming less so as optimizations and improvements are made, I get that) by the fact that they're on OSX and using a (arguably great) ARM translation layer to do anything the old machines used to.
Didn't linus just test the M1 Max GPU
and found the only comparable tasks to high end GPUs were video encoding
Sure, if I want a daily laptop for browsing and nothing else, a base-spec M1 Air is a great laptop.
i dont think LTT used the brand new blender beta
the macbook air has a normal m1 tho
so where are you getting these numbers then
But my laptop does dev work (for which I do need some X86-specific shit) and gaming (which about half of my library doesn't even run on M1 machines)
Cycles now has a Metal GPU backend, contributed by Apple. Metal GPU rendering is currently supported on Apple M1 computers running macOS 12.0 (Monterey). The implementation is in an early state. Performance optimizations and support for AMD and Intel GPUs are under development. Download the latest Blender 3.1 Apple Silicon build to test it: ...
So it doesn't matter if the M1 can do my dishes and give me a blowjob, it doesn't do a third of the things I need it to do.
people are posting their scores for known scenes down in the comments
Already a reason for me to ignore it
oh, wrong thread
one sec
updated it 😂
would be a great laptop
It's a great laptop if you don't care about what you're missing out on.
Hell, I'll even applaud Apple for making the battery in the M1 Air user serviceable this time.
Also I just like windows
And I hate apple tech support
So I would never go for a apple product
Unless it's game changing
For the industry
ya gaming is not good on macbooks, but gaming isnt going to be good on a $700 - 750 thin n light windows laptop either, do any of them in the 13 inch class even have dedicated gpus?
These comments are so confusing, how do you get 233% faster at something, that would be negative time
$750 laptop? yes. Thin and light? no.
But then you get to the "what are your priorities" question
@sleek scaffold lmao, yeah people are weird, but some people actually posted their actual times not just percentages, which is more helpful
Do you want to AAA game on a laptop? You're likely not going for a thin-and-light
Oh my god Ctrl+F is overriden on this site
lmao what does it do?
Searches in the search bar at the top
And you absolutely aren't getting a 8GB RAM, 256GB SSD machine that's not user serviceable either, so your $750 M1 Air is disqualified by default even if it could do the job.
is there a way to make pages that have comments sections or whatever that load as you scroll load the entire thing at once?
@stable shadow Ok, so using blender's online performance database
and these comments
This person with M1 Max says they can do a GPU render in 48 seconds for the BMW scene
which is mighty impressive, but the 3080 does it in 10 seconds with the optix engine
which max? 32c+64gb?
i saw some people with sub 40 second times, it seems to vary a bit
64GB, 24 GPU Cores
Thought there was only 1 version of the Max GPU
not too many, and its early days, but its a huge upgrade and makes apple silicon macs viable for 3d rendering at least
nope, there's 24 and 32 core
this code has only been in the wild for like 11 days, and they've already tweaked it some. but ya, looking promising
apple went in an wrote a metal backend for blender for them, because they were ignoring it 😂
Supposedly Metal is a nightmare for devs.
I mean, make an esoteric language and complain that nobody else knows what to do with it.
Just like the PS3 and it's graphics pipeline.
apple should have just supported vulkan natively, i agree with that
Can it be good? Yes.
but apple is a huge percentage of the desktop marketshare now, like 16%, thats a big enough chunk of the pie that devs should be taking it seriously
i saw a thing, let me find it
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_operating_systems found it here, https://gs.statcounter.com/os-market-share/desktop/worldwide/#monthly-202109-202109-bar citing this, trying to figure out where they get their data
The usage share of operating systems is the percentage of computing devices that run each operating system (OS) at any particular time. All such figures are necessarily estimates because data about operating system share is difficult to obtain. There are few reliable primary sources and no agreed methodologies for its collection. Operating syste...
oh, they're using page visits from unique IP addresses on websites that use their stat software
so it should be close enough unless windows users use the web a lot less
I found someone else with a 32 core GPU on the Max saying it finishes in about 43 seconds. So the 3080 is about 70% faster
oh, i saw a site testing the new cycles X in blender 3.0 that put the 3080 at 40 something seconds for bmw
maybe they changed the output resolution, which would fuck the results lol
I'm just using the blender DB for performance on their site itself
So yeah, it's a hit counter on specific pages on the web, so it's likely the best data we've got - which means holy crap I was wrong.
yeah
I was assuming 10-12%, not 16.
M1 doing work for apple
I mean, it's not M1's doing.
m1 macbook air value too stronk
its the fact that their laptops are actually worth their asking price now, plus pandemic fueled electronics sales
@sleek scaffold whatever random shit OS that doesnt report it in the user string
templeOS or something
There's no way it's four percent lmao
adblock software might also interfere with the user string
linux’s market share is never accurate btw
2016 - 8%
2017 - 9%
2018 - 12%
2019 - 14%
most users spoof it to windows
im pretty sure 2% is accurate for linux 😂
I dailied linux a while ago and I never heard anyone doing that
I think your viewpoint is skewed
either for a privacy gain, or to stop websites providing a crappy experience for linux
oh, so they've been trending up for awhile
Yeah, well before M1 machines were a thing.
but ya, 16% is pretty good, and definitely big enough that software devs should suck it up and deal with metal, even if native vulkan support would have been better
there are certain websites which just block linux user agents
poor windows phones 
The only one I know that does that is Netflix and that's only for HD streaming iirc
windows phone should be in other at this point
I’ve seen a couple before
Windows Phone was significant enough that it should have it's own trendline
the line stops at 2016 
even if it's literally zero right now kekw
lol ya
still curious whether Nokia pulled windows phone down or windows phone pulled Nokia down
Listen, if Blackberry gets a line, Windows Phone gets one.
windows phone 
I really liked Windows Phone OS
i think the camera in some of those nokias was way ahead of their time too, i remember a youtube video about it vaguely
It was simple, intuitive, but knew where to hide the settings to unlock functionality and features.
App support pulled it down, with people like Google and Snap and Facebook refusing to develop first party apps
They just couldn't get app support.
so the OS pulled Nokia down ultimately
nokia got sold to someone else, idk who owns them now
YEs, Microsoft partnered with Nokia for exclusivity agreements for hardware/OS pairing
but they make mediocre android phones now iirc
Nokia made hilariously good phone hardware at the time.
Made 99% of Android phones feel cheap.
they belong to Microsoft now
I wonder if you can flash old Windows phones with androids
You cannot.
😦
Good luck getting into the bootloader.
My friend had a Windows phone and he says he really liked it apart from not having official apps
Google actively sent cease and desist letters to anyone trying to make a Youtube app on it
so he just had to use the browser version which sucked back in 2015
HMD Global Oy, branded as HMD and Nokia Mobile, is a Finnish mobile phone manufacturer. The company is made up of the mobile phone business that Nokia sold to Microsoft in 2014, then bought back in 2016. HMD began marketing Nokia-branded smartphones and feature phones on 1 December 2016.
I'm sure someone's figured it out by now, but back when you could crack open a Galaxy S3 in a few hours after release Nokia devices were impossible to get into.
so i never heard of them but cool i guess
didn’t know that, good for them