#sk-lore
1 messages · Page 139 of 1
that was before the haunting
yeah but i imagine the reach hasn’t really changed
from that cut ending we see that with hornet she is able to reach even beyond pharloom
tho i cant say how canon it is since it was datamined
not canon whatsoever
(not)
I think only Embrace the Void is the true ending, the hollow knight shade didn't appear
And his shade is a special one
that doesn't matter
have people here never heard of intentionally ambiguous endings
apparently not
The hollow knight was a very important character
doesn't matter
Huh what cut ending
lemme get a link
I mean, it's only ambiguous between 2 endings
So it's not that bad
dnm and etv
but its still ambiguous and it could be either outcome
and thats the point
I definitely would love to see a area with the aesthetic of the place where you race the speedmaster
honestly, I love that place's aethetics. tis so cool
Side note it bugs me whenever “he” is used for any of the vessels. What’s the point of Hornet being “The Gendered Child” if all the vessels actually were packing??
Idk I just feel the fact the vessels are referred to more as creatures than people, and that despite that their lives still mattered because they lived in the first place, to be very important
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCco3Rjc6bM&t=267s check the second one
HOLLOW KNIGHT SILKSONG 2025 ALL 6 ENDINGS (4K 60FPS) Good, Bad, Secret, True, Best & Death Ending
0:00 Normal Ending
0:55 Alt Ending
1:28 Bad Ending
2:14 Cursed Ending
2:44 True Ending
4:27 Secret Ending
Subscribe to Shirrako for More Walkthrough Videos!
SUBSCRIBE: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7eAfUjR9gdIjoaoQaS0W-A
Follow me on Twitter:...
There is a cut ending, complete with achievement and cutscene, called Strung to Serve, in the files.
WAIT THATS CUT????
A gigantic carcasse! Sure why not!?
I forgot to use they/it...
yea
the first thought that comes to my mind is the ending of inception ||where the top spinning hints at it being a dream but near the end it starts to wobble hinting that it might actually be reality||
Strung to Serve cannot be acquired in game, yes
and before you see anything else it cuts to credits
though i think nolan confirmed it is the latter its still ambiguous

similar concept applies to this ending
Best girl
if a rain world fan said it it has to be false
I thought that was the ending of you do the bind instead if the needolin if you had the trap
But they had an outer wilds pfp so it cancels out
what if all rain world fans got moved to seattle so they can experience an irl "rain world"
i think the word "he" have been used for quite a lot of ungendered beings in stories, both old and new, so it doesn't bother me at all.
Just like how you can say man-made objects, for example, but that it is referring to the human race as man rather than a gender.
or at least that's how i see it
Dude I thought strung to serve was achieved by like, attacking further instead of binding Silk or something
Duuuuudeeee it was such a cool looking endinggg
Yeah ofc man, no doubt
He is just usually what I default to
mr mushroom is a highest being
I honestly like that they made only 2 endings being equally true
Indeed
the only other highest being is zote
I hate The Hollow Knight and Sealed Siblings
Hes my second in command
Ofc its not a big deal but it is incorrect even by TC's statements
how are you speaking english bro dont you speak like spore shroom
They aren't satisfactory endings for me and a lot of people
That's the point
Im biligual bro
Ik shrumal too
The lore channel passively emits spores for passive translation
Silksong had no reason to confirm an ending other than cheap fanservice idk why they did it
Gungi, gungi... Mishi umo sanga. Poggi u dungo?
Vessels arent actually agender is just that void creatures arent considered to be alive
i think tc mentioned somewhere that the vessels officially are genderless but they call the knight "he" bc its natural for them or smth like that
Vorp?
THK and TK are agender
Thats why they have no gender
Dont call me that plis
Because up to 5 endings being equally ambiguous is really confusing, also ideas change with time
They are considered to be alive
They arent
Its not confusing at all though?
This no true ending thing is almost 7 years old
Mentally they are
did people genuinely think team cherry would make sealed siblings canon with that stupid ass explanation they used the seal breaking fly
Oh then yeah
The underlying principle behind it still held up before they arbitrarily changed it
maybe as a small part of a dlc, like a single bonus fight, but not to the scale grimm troupe was in the first game, i wouldn't want more grimm to take up a dlc slot, it would be fine if he was a small addition to the boss rush mode tho
They probably never thought about the matter and dont defined themselves as anything
No it was expected that they wouldn't address any ending because any ending would be completely irrelevant to Silksong
Which is how it would've been if TC were good writers
maybe thk could make sense being canon but i have always thought since i saw that explanation it was the dumbest shit ive ever seen
They are clearly setting up a shade lord boss fight
then whats the point in it being a sequel
to me it seems you wanted more a spinoff
do you not think tc are good writers?
a game with the same character but in a different universe
rather than a direct continuation
That's how the game was advertised so like 🥴
Also yes I wanted a spinoff because Hallownest's story was finished
These thing are bugs or birds
Yeah
It was advertised as a sequel
what 😭
bug birds
They are called "crawbugs"
I feel that’s a reasonable conclusion considering how separate the entire story is from the original
Bugs, birds dont exist
It's still finished
Its in the steam page
okay im gonna stop you write right there.
WUT DA HELL DO YA MEAN TC ARE NOT GOOD WRITERS????
i mean it connects back in a lot of ways
We don't know what happened after DNM or ETV
In Spanish the name is : Cuervones, and it means literally: Crows
So that's why I'm asking
its clear team cherry intended it to leave off of base hk
The Mice Bugs in Greymoor are actually cannonically Mites. Those are what Hollow Knight Mites look like.
For hornet to get captured
Silksong's narrative is completely uninspired unoriginal garbage
This makes Mites one of the few real world bug parellels to apepar in Hollow Knight
In English they are called Crawbugs in Hunter journal
I dunno what it is about people in this channel and attempted rage baiting
like are you telling me that the game that started off as a dlc for another game might relate back to the game it started off as a dlc for? what no thats crazy thats impossible
Ignored the main themes in favor of superficial comparisons award
It was possible that doesn't mean its good writing
And it certainly wasn't what was advertised
sequel<
where did team cherry advertise silksong as a spinoff
it would have been a disservice to the fans to not tie it to the story in HK
genuinely what the fuck are you talking about
Le sequel to le hollow knight
Theory but i think that maybe dream no more might be the true ending, because the hollow knight wouldn't let hornet get captured. Just a theory tho, both are equally valid
i dont like to get aggresive but team cherry never advertised silksong as a spinoff
We do know that they jumped her more than once and she just got worn down. The ones we saw in the opening weren’t the only ones sent after her
They stated you wouldn't need to play the first game to understand the second one and they described the game as a "Blank slate" storywise
She was fighting them off for a while before she got caught
If that's not a spinoff idk what is

in every other place tho they called it a sequel
That’s not a spin off. A spin off could have those things. But they are not required to be a spin off
As in its a second installment in the franchise yes
Like people come onto here, and they just want to fight about something or make some obscene statement to make someone want to refute them. Ive seen people one this channel try to discuss lore and then some guy comes in states whats really happening singles someones theory calls their theory stupid and ignores all evidence that is not directly told in text, and even then it might just be interpretable to whatever their saying.
These are old af statements
and i mean you can understand most of the story without having played hk
it doesnt seem to me like they went too far off path
A lot of stuff TC stated in the past about silksong has changed
I feel most of the required understanding is the history of hollowest rather than the events during hk
You just wouldn't understand true ending
Deus Ex Void
Yeah except the true ending and most of act 3 🥴
Like ignore all actualy sense and just stick to guns and fight people for no reason, additionally go after people for very basic theories like Silk is Soul
You can understand like 99% of the main story without playing HK
Nah you can understand act 3. Not true ending tho
I'm not the one who brought up the "Well what did you expect" argument
they don't exactly look like real world mites
The only things that require HK knowledge are strictly in act 3
same thing as craw
"What did you expect?"
"I expected what was advertised"
"Well those statements are YEARS OLD!!!!"
its really embarrassing but i thought fleamasters eyes where the mustache (like frisks closed eyhes in undertale) and the dots were weird eyebrows) don't ask why i thought this i don't know
We have to remember that hollow knight silksong is almost 8 years old
I think the only accurate bug to real life is the groal the great skip
As a concept
I don't get it if so
Just had a funny thought, and it’s that it’s telling how even in ruin, Hallownest can have someone like Zote walk around and be relatively fine if they’re just on guard, but Pharloom requires everyone to be alert and ready if they’re wanna survive
Also judging by the early sketches of the games map its obvious they always wanted to tie it into HK
"Void cult" are we fr 🥀
zote gets lucky him surviving isn't that different than like sherma surviving
i mean duh?
Yeah thats what dlcs are
They changed the letter from c to t, so you have Mite instead of Mice
That’s because Hallownest > Pharloom
Don’t worry you weren’t the only one who had a dumb mistake with this man I thought he was holding a hat at his chest the whole time like you do at a funeral
City of Tears and it’s soundtrack blow all of Pharloom out of the water
Its not "duh" when they state the opposite in prerelease material 🥴
The snails who turned into particles that gave you void spells are related to void what a surprise
No one ever brought up the snails what are you waffling about
yeah idk what was up with that statement
I disagree
it contradicts literally everything else theyve said and shown tho
What else could be a void cult
dude why are you so mad that a game that is advertised as a sequel to another game have ties to the previous game?
😭 and btw this is a lore channel?
actually nwm im leaving chat
A cult who worships the void
Bro cannot read
My point is you see way more like, WARRIORS in Pharloom than in Hallownest, who had more cushy bugs besides like, Tiso and anyone native to Hallownest before it fell
hornet dlc was always going to be exploring a new area and ofc hallownest would be related in there somehow
Say whatever you want on if its good writing or not but its objectively not what was advertised
Then we must fight to the death. Here you can have the root infected Hornet moveset and I will use A full Architect Creat build.
Ready?
So the "what did you expect" argument is moot
Silksong was radio silent for 4 or 5 years
They didn't give updates on development
That's not true at all
They just did the first things
Is there any information on where the pilgrims come to pharloom from?
Then they stopped talking about it
The stuff that was early advertised would get changed
Xbox 2022
i feel like the only one who could answer what was actually meant by that statement is team cherry you should ask them
"There were gaps inbetween development updates THEREFORE you shouldn't have trusted the prerelease material" are we fr
It seems that they arrive at bone bottom, but I haven’t seen an obvious entrance that low
Nothing was meant by that statement its just blatantly untrue
while i disagree with your takes on the writing im sad to hear you didn't enjoy it. I personally have my own critiques of silksong but enjoyed its narrative quite a lot and thought there was many strong aspects to the writing
How much did they say? I didn't remember it
its funny bc this person thinks silksong is peak in literally every other way and i can respect that
A whole fucking trailer?
Yes I like the gameplay I like the art I like the music I like the characters and I like the worldbuilding, its just the narrative 
that doesn't count or something idk why we're still doing the whole lying about news thing
A gameplay trailer has nothing to do with what this guy is talking about
Its a girl
i mean team cherry also stated they wanted silksong to be playable by beginners at some point and we saw how that turned out 🥀
Dude man
(the difficulty is cool i like it but yeah they said some silly shit)
I don't really care that what they said changed I just think its funny how people are acting like it was incredibly obvious from the marketing and stuff when it was the opposite
Neither of those words are typically used for a girl
While I still think that the lack of trailers was definitely... A decision, I also think talking about it is kinda pointless by now
i mean when there were constant debates pre release on what they meant by sequel i wouldnt say so
3 trailers is satisfactory imo the game got plenty of hype and the trailers didn't spoil everything
The game is good at least
yeah they didnt show like anything of act 3 in the trailers which is a good choice
But yeah, stuff changed
The debate was clarified by Leth like 2 times so 
they did show the fucking abyss dinosaur thingy in the first trailer but it was ourple
I mean half the stuff from the first trailer got cut so
also in 7 years it's really not much, but also I don't care enough to discuss this
the real loss is the fucking snail village that was cut from hk
i feel like rushing to finish the game and not taking in the narrative isn't the right way to experience silksong. the world and its narrative go hand in hand. As you explore Pharloom and make your way up to the Citadel, you can not only see the increasing Haunting, you also see a lot more corpses and Haunted pilgrims. for example.
Like the environments and lore tablets, relic descriptions, all those create the world and the story. And I think it was done quite well.
imo just taking everything the game tells you on surface level value, and not actually observing the world around you as well greatly devalues the appeal of Silksong's plot.
@sinful nimbus i've been reading on reddit and stuff like that. People seem to like the decision of choosing a true ending
It kinda bothers me how TC just. Didn't tell us stuff from the first trailer wasn't there anymore. But the game is good so wtv
I don't really value the opinions of redditors alas
It's more generic but it's less confusing
You're saying this as if reddit was a good place to look
never forget what was taken from you https://youtu.be/iS-v4NMQkBg?si=MrUhqNctXf4Wi-cC&t=91
Immerse yourself in the weird and wonderful world of Hollow Knight! Find out more about the game here:
http://www.hollowknight.com
Does the existence of shell wood imply that zote has been to pharloom?
they also didn't choose a true ending they just eliminated some
? Twitter and reddit are the places were people do critics about stuff
I did soak it in

With text
First playthrough took like 50 hours its not like I speedran the game 
team cherry committed a sin most grave by cutting this
I almost got the 100% Speedrun achievement by accident on first playthrough
sherma is the knight
and yet you are claiming that the fact that something from a previous game returns is somehow a bad thing apparently. not saying that you didnt enjoy the game but i find your arguements about Silksong's ties to Hk quite distasteful
I miss the normal speech from Hallownest, every talks Shakespeare in Pharloom
Most of them were tho, only DNM and ETV 1 and 2 are valid now
They do talk shakespere now that you mention it
ap literature ptsd
Its a bad thing because it doesn't do any service to the narrative and in fact retcons previous statements from Team Cherry
This has nothing to do with how I approached the story
It kinda wraps up knight's character
internet users when people want different things out of media (surely they are distasteful and bad)
It proves hes not hollow
No it's just that it gets very meh after a while
The Knight's character was wrapped up in the first game
Not really
Its dumb fanservice that does a disservice to both games
the first game proved that if you could read
At least not in the same way
Yeah, in the first game that was just subjective
it was not
No it never proved
DNM and ETV gave closure
if i have to ever read a 1600s love poem again im searching up the grave of the person who wrote it and defiling it
It implies somwtomes but it also implied the opposite
you should play the first game it's pretty good
Its not proved in SS either
It was open to interpretation
What was open to interpretation?
By what possible metric is it proven in silksong but not Hollow Knight where it does similar actions
It does prove
I mean in SS it is but it was already proved in HK
Putting random thoughts here cuz I like thinking about Silksong on this kind of level, I like that the only way for Hornet to get an ending where she’s still her is to refuse to play Silk’s game. You don’t beat fascism by following its playbook, that just means you get smoother authoritarian (the Weaver Queen ending). By rebelling and denying Silk any semblance that her world view was right by using the snare, it not only (eventually) saves Pharloom, but even inspires change in those who you wouldn’t expect it from (Lace)
Yes there’s void mayhem and whatnot but like idk I like this idea
so many times
The knight saving hornet is actually a first
it brings back the void which was established in HK already, how is that a bad thing? we have to remember that Silksong still exists in the same universe and AFTER HK.
It saves other people in HK
We never seen the knight save someone. Most of the times its optional
Which is exactly what I was talking about
bretta:
This has nothing to do with what I said so 🥴
No Will to Break mfs when decisions
that... doesn't mean it doesn't do it do you not understand that that's an expression of free will that it can choose to do things or not
Sometimes it implies hes hollow, sometomes it implies otherwise
I mean it was alluded to that The Knight cared about Hornet in Godhome with Nosk. It was kind of a strange thing that the community talked about, but it turns out it is atleast now significant or proving.
Now we have full definitive proof
But void loses most of its thematic connotations in SS
we already did
That's bad writing
Which is a necessity if you want to use the knight in the future
what even is lace? like, is lace a bug? im confused
the weirdest explanation ive ever seen is that the knight is actually hollow but the reason it can move is its controlled by us
You're saying that like it's a good thing
lace is made of silk
Void already got subverted in hollow knight
Lace is a silk construct
No it didn't
this isn't true either undertale should never have existed
oh
Things like the collector proved all wr knew about void from outside sources were wrong
Lace isnt a bug their a silk construct, that has been weaved (encoded) to act like a child. Because of this they dont think their alive, but Hornet disagrees.
Void can take form and can form actual beings
Toby Fox made undertale to screw with lore fans specifically
im not saying i agree with it but yeah im not surprised its coming from that fandom
The collector was made by pk wasn’t it?
Not really
You can see the mold somewhere
He was a mistake when making a kingsmould
Collector is an altered kingsmould its not inconsistent with how void acted in HK nor does it disregard its thematic connotations in any meaningful capacity
Except Collector took form by being created by PK
Also Void Tendrils already proved void can take form
can we agree the knight from hk was a dumbass who couldn't hold everbloom properly that it gets destroyed in one hit while hornet fights lost lace while holding on to the flower
If you dont understand the fact the collector feels emotions and has enough intelligence to make a fucking map isnt a subversion of the void explained by pale king idk what to tell you
you said that it didn't do any service to the narrative, when it actually used an established point from the previous game (which was a "good" force in the previous game) and turned that on its head to show a different, far crueler portrayal.
I think classifies as service to a narrative, even expands itself actually since now the entire world of hollow knight have grown even connected and more vast, whihc is good in many ways.
How ss void is different?
Collectors mysterious, but it seems they where a Kingsmould, probably given to the Tower of Love guy to preserve creatures from the infection, or otherwise preserve things, likely from the infection.
It did. the white lady says that The hollow knight themselves was tarnished by idea instilled. meaning it can happen. Meaning these vessels dont remain "hollow" forever.
Then the Collector went crazy somehow with grubs and killed the owner, likely
real
Perhaps I canonically did ll hitless?
That's all well and good but it has absolutely nothing to do with what I said 🥴
At some point the Collector became a nudist aswell
Ok so you are just using the word subversion wrong
I might im not an english scholar
The whole POINT of the game is that Void can feel emotions
It doesn't symbolize jack in SS
There is no subversion if it's the premise
What was void supposed to symbolize?
The Void Is not Subverted, It was established to be mailable as its nature. Not static Nothing.
I mean subversion as to how it contradicts what pale king thought about it
Was there specific evidence other than this that the knight has no will? Is it not possible that the knight simple has a pure drive that radiance can’t subvert?
Well Pale King being wrong is also the point though
In silksong it's an antagonistic force while in hollow knight void is a protagonistic force
Exactly
it has a will
Thats why knight saving hornet in silksong is definitive proof he wasnt hollow

But we already had proof
@forest scroll
hollow knight fan read challenge (impossible)
Most of it was optional
god please no
Most is a keyword
Any proof is proof
we have to know the lore
Voidheart literally proves we have a will
More than likely.
because it can choose to do things
because it has a will and agency
It also shows that the knight actually isn't a hero, the knight didn't control the void until hornet was in danger
Which is not altruistic
hk fans really can't read lmao
what the fuck did i just find 😭
No,, it's actually that TC retconned the Void Heart and now TK can't control it anymore apparently
They do
are there actually 160 bosses in both games
He can but it has a range
They just didn't wanna do it
Its tied thematically to the regrets of Hallownest and more specifically the Pale King multiple times
Getting Void Heart is representative of coming to terms with your regrets and the past
Coming to terms with the past is what allows The Knight to take responsibility for the future and free the kingdom from its stasis, placing void as representative of the end (Which is corroborated by it being referred to in terms of absence throughout the game)
@rain spindle @timber pond Pinging you with this as well because I never clarified what "thematic connotations" really meant, my bad
I personally think the knight can become the shade lord The moment he gets the void heart, and that is the "Ancient ENEMY" Radiance talks about when you dreamnail them
They don't at all in Silksong. They literally have to slash the void tendrils at the end
-
That's still a retcon
-
Is the range 0? Because again, they had to slash the void tendrils
The Knight is confirmed to have a Will, the concept of Hollow is very confusing and kinda vague. I dont think the Knight would have been able to contain the Radiance normally though, but who knows maybe it could, but its mentioned the Radiance can control Wills so maybe not.
Wont debate 1 but the 2 is different because the tendrils are actual beings and not just pure void. Wr can see the knight using the void later to retrieve hornet
They are pure void
But like not void void
Tendrils are pure void that's how void normally acts to nearby foes
If they weren't pure void they wouldn't be controlled by The Knight in the first game
But they are pure void. They stop attacking you once you get VH
i mean i see not letting void take over pharloom as freeing the kingdom from an end
Then idk
From the Abyss climb it is mentioned that being "hollow" means having no Will to corrupt, but The Knight does have one. Also begs the question why The Pale King would willing go through with things if he can see their have a will and philosophy it out that they wouldnt be able to contain them because of it.
so you are cutting free the kingdom of its regrets
I think it was just an narrative resource to make it more emotional
idk if i have the brain power for this last time i did analysis like this was in ap lit
But thats the moral quandary isnt it? absence cannot be absence forever. the idea instilled in the hollow knight was The pale king as a father figure, he looked up to him.
The knight could have had the same thing happen With hornet after she helps him throughout the game. The games theme debates constantly what "absence" and "hollow" even mean. Its a constant Change.
and it made me want to commit crimes against 1600s love poem writers
So, plot holes are fine if they're for hype moments and aura?
It would be boring if the knight just simply appeared there and save her
I struggle to see how this has to do with anything I said
I mean all the Vessels where made in the exact same way, why would one be more hollow than the others.
The knight showing up and its mere presence causing the tendrils to back down would've been 1000 times better
And no its not really debated what absence or hollow means
Coming to terms with ones regrets Means change.
Yes
i said the arguements were what i found distasteful. If a developer says in a conference but then does something else in the game instead, then that is not a great point to be raging about. And then using that statement to call the game's points wrong or bad is just absurd.
using a meta point for an argument regarding a game's plot is very distasteful in my opinion
Because at peag the Void Heart would still work even if nerfed
So the Change the vessels go through is thier ability to be more than Hollow.
It's not a plot hole, the knight being entirely underneath the void sea without being attacked already is proof enough that they control it
Yeah this isn't what I was doing 🥴
Purity has nothing to do with the current conversation
And yet they can't control Void Tendrils. Which they do in game 1.
"Team Cherry said all endings are canon"
"Now I am mad that Team Cherry made X ending canon"
I dont think the Void Heart was ever becoming Hollow themself, they are commented on feeling an emptiness but it is Void given Will. So The Knights Will is still there its just wielding the Void.
Im guessing it was an instinctive reaction
They can control the void in silksong
Well unnecessary retcon are bad practice yes
What the hell are you talking about. The representation of the vessels evolving is metaphorical.
I'm not mad though
They did say nothing they say outside the game is canon tho
No other void tendrils seem to come after Hornet when The Knight stops the ones by slashing them. We also know that the Void normally is not one mind, The Knight unifies it though presumeably under their Will.
Cause they can always change their minds
That's a huge stretch of what they really said which was about prerelease material
i see it this way
hk is about setting a dead kingdom to rest, you cant save it so its about letting it rest and coming to terms with its regrets
silksong is about saving a kingdom that still has potential to live and cutting it free from its regrets
Silksong's kingdom also dies during the events of the game
they have already said not to take stuff they say outside of the game as canon and that its subject to change
Like i said, it's probably a narrative resource to make the scene cooler, they probably didn't thought some people would assume that the knight doesn't control the void anymore. Just some seconds after that scene the shade lord is shown in a glimpse and the knight actually controls the void to get hornet out of there
thats quite debatable
What they said outside of the game was representative of their design philosophy for Hollow Knight
By invalidating certain endings they invalidated the "choose your own adventure" aspect they emphasized
No its not. The "Kingdom" was defined by the Citadel and its leader
It shows them controllin the void in the scene
It almost dies, we dont know how much GMS could have held on, maybe it could have become like Hallownest.
Yeah
The region survives but it does so in Hollow Knight as well
i mean the region in hk is mostly dead
That's why i said it's just a thing to make the scene cooler
Hallownest literally doesnt have anyone living there
Elderbuf, Ogrim... and...
in silksong a lot of people are still alive
Bretta?
Hallownest only has a few people in it, Pharloom has way more people occupying it, and a constant supply of Pilgrims arriving and dying off screen.
The lesson for the game is that the kingdom is its people though, and that past ideal of it being the citadel only caused suffering.
There are quite a few people who are just fine after Hollow Knight
Cornifer and Iselda travel. Sly is implied to leave
Elderbug immortal
"mostly"
It's like Goku and Freeza fighting for 5 minutes but it's actually not 5 minutes for us
there are alive people but the vast majority are dead
dirthmouth is called a "fading town"
If the thing making the scene cooler can be pointed out to as a retcon then maybe it's not making the scene cooler
Sure Pharloom probably has more but how much people are left is irrelevant when it comes to the thematics
where like bellhart has a lot of people and seems to still have a future ahead of it
You're just overthinking it
Most people still even around in Hollow Knight are the historic people still around in it with grounds there. Like Dung Defender.
What and the mantes or spiders or bees don't? 
I completed the Zi questline in Steel Soul. That content plus the bit about the "City of Steel" is definitely foreshadowing DLC content, right?
That's because manga aren't animated, unlike anime
I would never think about it if you didn't mention it
did you read what I wrote? I said using meta piints are not valid for comparing in-game lore. That's like saying that since developer Inti Creates said that "MegaMan Zero's new design is just an artstyle change and he actually looks the same as his X series counterpart" is correct when everything in the games, their lore, descriptions, designs, EVERYTHIGN contradicts the devs statement.
only the mantises arent infected
its very possible everyone else just dies out without the infection animating them
Why would meta points not be valid
Mantis village is not part of hallownest
Spiders are aimless without weavers
The bees are all gonna die without hive knight
Does killing the radiance uninfect people? And if so are they alive?
because it is not a in-universe retcon in any meaningful capacity. duh
Probably, although i dont know how we would go to another Kingdom, plus that seems rather far away. Maybe itll be a DLC and then it will turn into a game, like the Team Cherry way. We know that Team Cherry is capable of making small maps, as seen with the original Silk Song but it just grew. Its a nice prospect though.
because to me it seems like in pharloom the people still have a future ahead of them
Diegetic information is only half the lore
where in hollow knight is there much of a future for anyone in hallownest
This is like arguing it doesn't matter if you retcon item descriptions either
Also silksong wasn't even close to being done when TC said that
Infection only happened to beings because they were sentient, and it plays off of their sentience to infect them. Its debatable if theyd still alive, i tend to think they would.
Item descriptions are in universe
exactly 😭
Nothing in Silksong narratively relied on canonizing a specific ending, it was done purely for fanservice's sake
IF it is Then it would be in the style of Darksouls 3 DLC, because the implication of the void summoning that Sula does implies that the masters will execute all responsible with impunity. And in Act 3 technically every little interaction in the kingdom is to blame for the void threads. So it would be a sequel to silksong if it goes through.
i mean it depends a lot of husk got reanimated
No they are not
I could easily see the City of Steel not being particularly big. It could just be the size of like two areas.
If embrace the void is the only true ending it means that The Hollow Knight is the king now
Item descriptions are not written anywhere in universe 🥴
Maybe stuff could change
Do you think each charm comes with a description etched onto it or something
i mean yeah but theres no central like civilization that has a future
It seems the OG Silk Song map we can see in some of the earlier map models, was like 5 Zones, then of course it grew, but it used to be 5 major zones roughly.
They aren't? That's not what in-universe means
Yes the entire game is about putting the kingdom to rest so something new can happen
Much like Silksong
Which is about taking down the Citadel so new stuff can happen
to me it seems that something new is just people exploring it
If Team Cherry can think of enough ideas to do the Citadel of Song which really is just one setting, and keep going and going and going with it. I dont doubt they would ever run out of ideas for future projects.
There's no real way to determine its future and that's besides the point
In silksong hornet was actually trying to save pharloom, but mr mushroom showing up just proves that pharloom has no saving anymore
you know the "listen" and "speak" prompts? hornet and tk can actually see those. they have to look up at it to start talking
-# edit: epic reply fail...
Not really
yeah but it is much less certain than pharloom
Mr Mushroom just shows up when "an age is about to end" not when a kingdom dies necessarily
The key diffrence is that Hallownest is dead in what it stood for, yet the song and silk people can weave in Pharloom still lives. So the identity of pharloom lives.
Hornet comments that only dead kingdoms excite him at some point
It isn't the same thing?
I hate how important Mister Mushroom is
no, it's not
The whole vibes of the City of Steel makes me think of a really weird but relatively small location.
Yeah i also hate it, Mr Mushroom looks like a joke character
idk i just think this concept of living and dead kingdoms is very abstract
But silksong doubles down on him not being a joke character
Well , he himself says it was Hornets heroic deeds that drew him.
but to me it seems like hallownest will never have a big civilization inhabit it again
I feel like the City of Steel is going to be Void related, the Servant of Seer Zi we see in game somehow learned Void when their just a common bug. Makes me think they are doing something with it over there.
Why does that matter thematically
itll just be a few scattered communities like the hive and deepnest
where with pharloom there will still be a central civlization itll just be changed
Hornet even respects him like he is a wise prophet
if that makes sense
Most of Pharlooms buildings and infrastructure are dumps by the end of the game
He is The Herald, Mr. Mushroom is a cryptid that watches Kingdoms rise and fall.
In the endings he also has "The Sight" the Mask Makers have to see ones true nature.
Whatever comes will have the same people but will be drastically different from the previous regime
thats my point
or "in times of great change"
hallownest wont have the same people bc most of them are dead
That also matches up nicely with the Fayforn we see in game, Giant Snow Moth like thing. They are also a cryptid like unique entity that the Weavers heavily valued the counsel of.
So my question is how does this justify the inclusion of void thematically
It would be nice to know that Hallownest is occupied modern day, it might actually be. The entire kingdom died but its free to move into. Might be a situation where theres so much empty space to fill but, maybe theres squaters.
bc there is still a civilization that can thrive there after you cut it free
where hallownest its like is anyone going to make anything new here
doesnt seem like it
Yeah silksong could live without the void being involved, but honestly i think it would be pretty boring and it would make silksong more of a spinoff rather than a sequel
How do you know
The regrets and mistakes of the Kingdom (GMS) pulling it down. As it often represents regrets.
It’s used differently
As a matter of personal taste I'd much prefer we got new stuff instead of beating a dead horse by including a million old elements like SS did
We havent really pieced together the full lore of Silk Song, no one knows the full story completely yet, so we cant really determine that at all any time soon.
by the fact most people are dead in hallownest
This is what Zi says: **"The rite... The vassal is tarnished. They have touched the dark. By the Masters they will now be hunted... no matter the distance fled." ** This suggests to be that the "Masters" are opposed to the Void.
silksong has plenty of new elements and barely touches on hollow knight until act 3
It wouldnt be Hallownest anymore though. If you think about it, anyone and everyone who understood what hallownest represented is dead. Hornet is the only one.
i feel like this is just going around in circles but like its kinda hard to explain my thoughts on a dead kingdom and an alive kingdom
It makes sense since silksong is mostly a story about hornet
I saw people complaining that the plot focuses too much on hornet and forgets about the silk family
I mean Dung Defender lives, the Nail Masters and Sage live, maybe Nail Smiths alive.
A few others.
but i get much more this place is fucked and will probably just be a grand story from hallownest more than pharloom
Fluke Hermit is the new Flukemarm, we have that to look forward to
Not opossed, but perhaps "controloing" or they take themselves as arbiters. Because Jhinn in the first game says that the knight is "complete.... like masters?" when you have the void heart.
The Act 3 ending has established that the Vessels are void beings allied with Hornet. So what if the Masters and/or the rulers of the City of Steel would see the Vessels as a threat, and Hornet their enemy by proxy?
Stripping down Silksong to its core elements, not a much is that original. The haunting is an infection repeat, GMS is Radiance 2, whiteward is the soul sanctum, etc
events in silksong happened after hollowknight?
Well yeah, because its like a negative Polaroid of Hollow Knight. i Kind of Expected it to be like that.
Well yeah and that's unsatisfying if it doesn't meaningfully parallel its role in HK
Gms isn't radiance, she's more like the pale king with some aspects similar to the radiance
pretty reductive tbh, if you want to see it that was sure though
Its very disconnected from Hallownest and the plot of Hollow Knight, mostly just the Weaver elements of that game. Like how the Weavers fled to Deepnest, and Herrah probably led them.
Gms also controls the bugs for different reasons
The systems in place aren't destroyed when you kill grandmother silk. You end up just replacing her. The void being brought into the story destroys the systems in place. I guess that's what team cherry was going for thematically
She's a sealed deity who was betrayed by her creations who is enslaving the entire kingdom
Gms seems to do it out of pure egoism
While radiance does it because she feels betrayed
GMS seems to want to control everything and everyone from her dialogue shes obsessed with "loyalty"
No, GMS is motivated by her love for Lace, at least in part.
We also know that GMS warred with all of the other civilizations that where in Pharloom previous.
Its both
Well this seems like a bit of a lose lose situation
Either void disregards its thematic connotations or its a rehash of HK's story. That's why I think it would've been better to have avoided it alltogether
The whole thing with Hornet when in the position of Grand Mother Silk being compelled to do what she did does bring up some questions, how much GMS can be blamed for.
Hornet has not other choice. Unless she leaves. But then she would abandon the bugs in Pharloom she has Grown to like
The Weavers also have a sort of superiority complex similar to that of GMS, in that they felt they had the rite to decide the fates of lesser beings. So the apple never fell far from the tree, even though the Weavers put GMS to sleep with the music.
Again void is about Change and how to Change from regrets. It constantly Changes.
Hornet loves sherma and the bugs in bellhart
No its one component of change, which is ending the old thing
Void doesn't change its a primordial thematic force
But it Can be made to because the Vessels Can.
The Weavers deified themselves, most Weavers where very powerful and also seen as malevolent, even according to Shakra their clan told stories of Weavers and what they did.
Not all Weavers where bad, the ones who left where alright but they had a bad rep
The ‘change’ the knight uses void to enact is the kingdom’s end
There is lore that indicates that Weavers were regarded as healers at some point in the past.
Oh yeah they where deified with all different titles and things. But some Weavers were really really bad, and they can all be blamed for the creation of the Citadel
Diegetically sure but the vessels "changing" has never impacted the voids thematic relevance
Yes. But Silksong proves he himsself can Continue to change along with those choices.
the vessels are different though, and from what i remember, only the knight actually unites the void. the void itself is empty and only brings about the end. that's why it was sealed in HK and Hornet gets so pissed off at the Snail Shamans when she found out they used it
It would be really nice if we could track the actions of individual Weavers and what they did, but I dont really think we can.
We dont even know the real name of the First Sinner
If The void is united Under the void heart. Sure it can. as long as the Knight Cares really.
Void in SS isn't under TK's command
Also the point isn't for TK to change, after the events of DNM TK just rests in the abyss
true, but it was never the void itself that ever did the changing was it? there is always someone using it.
Void is about the rest not the actual change that rest brings about
We meet Widow and the First Sinner, Widow was likely their musician, and clearly has some kind of conflict that had them punished by the Weavers for being loyal to GMS somehow. First Sinner is p robably someone incredibly important but I currently dont know where to place them and also what their actual name is.
The Weavenests are named after famous Weavers, the Memorials are also noteable Weavers.
Unfortunately most of the memorial plaques are destroyed.
We only have 3
Void never actually does anything by itself. ITs always a force using it To express its grievance with its station.
yuh
Void doesn't do anything because its base instinct is to rest yes
TK uses it on a broader scale to let the whole kingdom rest
That's what void is representative of
So Basically anything that uses it must be alive and have a will of its own that adapts and changes.
There's no real thematic reason for The Knight's will to change after it kills Radiance because its in rest
If there is someone using it then it will never be at rest, therefore. GMS, The pale King, the knight Steel Hearts Ect use it FOR SOMETHING
Hornet helping it overcomes that rest.
though i feel the void itself is NOT at rest. The voidheart's description implies that void must be chaotic for it to be united
Onto nothing
it is something beyond the empty. Love.
That'd be kinda bad writing 🥴
The vessels resting is the ideal they are not meant to be something more
Because Hallownest as a whole was laid to rest
Ah yes because remaining Indffrent is good writing??? No. Change is universal, even in the thing that desires rest.
The dead don't change
they dream lol
Change is not universal for the substance representative of being at eternal rest
DING DING DING
The whole plot debates this
Well a big part of Hollow Knight is putting those dreams to rest too
It does not
The Dead do change, move,go somewhere ,do something.
No matter what the world changes
even if the void tries to claim it time and time again
This is not really true
It is, and that is where we dissagree.
The dead living on is considered a BAD THING that the VILLAIN does
The goal is to put them to rest
Not in this context. The dead change into something else. Thats how life works.
How do they change into something else
Your bones return to soil, into the tree, into the fruit, The living eat the fruit. It goes on your essence is never truly gone.
This isn't an established theme of HK
The void and the knight are never truly gone. that is thier station within the nothing.
The view HK takes is that impermanence is natural and trying to defy that is a bad thing
"To rally against nature is folly, all things must accept an end"
It is how i view it and therefore good writing 🙂
How you view it is irrelevant its not how HK is
It is not a defiance it is a cycle
True. Ends are just new beginings.
I mean it would make sense if they never showed us the Kingdom of Hallownest afterward, it leaves it open and interpretations to be made. Its not supposed to be Hallownest anymore though the Pale King tried to keep his kingdom immortal and in doing so bought it a few more years then left it to perpetual stasis. I dont think its much of a kingdom anymore.
For different things
What is this debate about
The themes of Hollow Knight
But the things that have existed before will still be there, influcinceing the new. Its never truly gone, The tapestry of history lives even in the smallest of things, in the smallest of souls.
Hallownest isnt really a kingdom anymore at the time of the game, its a dead kingdom, or a open kingdom shell but its not really a living kingdom. No society lives there no besides the Mantis's really. Who where extremely long lived and unmoving themself with an extremely rich history.
There's a lotta those, which ones
Mantis's never became part of the Kingdom of Hallownest, so they didnt die with it.
imo Hallownest felt like witnessing a fallen kingdom, while Pharloom feels more like witnessing that fall.
I do agree that hk was about letting a dead kingdom finally rest. meanwhile ss is more about stopping a kingdom from that fate. Which ties really neatly with Hornet having witnessed her home kingdom and not letting it happen again
Show me where HK takes this stance
Pharloom as a kingdom did die, and it needed to, but the people who remain can make something different
End of the Beginning
OMG
It's pretty normal for sequels to explore different themes, even opposing ones that can coexist
I dont think that Pharloom when we see it in game died, the Void incident did kill it. But before that it was a kingdom in crisis.
So the Void did fulfill a narrative role of killing a kingdom
This has little to do with the message you replied to
It was entirely on accident on the Voids part it doesnt have any mind to try and attempt to do so, it was entirely incidental.
Responding to the convo in general
Its obvious. That physical place, that world. Its still there, There are new bugs living in it. The old is laid to rest, But the new builds upon it. Just like hallownest was bulit upon that Ancient civilization.
This is not what you claimed
pharloom, hornet, attack, thats the whole game summarized
Yes whatever comes next will be built off of the old remains of Hallownest, no this does not mean the void is subject to fundamental change
Thank you Pale King in all of your wise wisdom
And no it does not mean those that are laid to rest will come back or change
It is in essence. The old dies and the new are born from it, but "you" the old one will be within the New in some way. That is Love, That is Hope.
yeah i feel like this works well with silksong being a sort of counterpoint to hk
Neither game takes this stance
with ascending instead of descending
How do you spoil images?
Holy yap
For mobile press and hold the image, for pc there should be a little button when you hover on it or displays by itself
It does Within its Myth.
thankfully Hornet was there to stop that disaster.. . . ignoring the fact that she was also the reason for said disaster but lmao
Elaborate
I didnt even type that much there.
Can't remember which one
Yap is not about the quantity of the message but rather the substance 
Alright this is a big spoiler but I think it resolves the debate nicely:
Id say Hallownest was long long dead and we just stopped the cycle of perpetuation so it can move one.
Id say Pharloom is in an active crisis, it dies in Act 3, but its way faster than anything the Pale King caused just due to type of disaster that happened. I think GMS might have done this similar type of thing back in the old days when they first arrived, we dont know if they did the type of stuff we see here, but we do know it was better fought back against.
yea. SS is all about Hornet.
yap yap yap yap 
PK pfp and spams yap. Welcome back Kirb.
whos kirb?
i feel like it dies in act 3 but its still like "saveable"
like you can save most of the lives that live there
where hallownest its just over
Void isn't supposed to be a catastrophe
you are not saving most of the people who live there bc theyre already dead

It frees the kingdoms its not what kills them
chat lore question what did first sinner do exactly besides "just heresy"
They opposed GMS saying that weavers were divine daughters
I will now be permanently borrowing this form for.. king purposes
Yo Guys. Is there like a document of gathered lore anyone been working on?
I am working on a post, though it's my own interpretation, theories and, where needed, assumptions
i see ty
are weavers divine daughters?
Then again, that's just how Hollow Knight and Silksong lore be. Many interpretations are possible.
The Forces that evoke these changes These things are constant, they will not change. The void Will always evoke change because whatever is new will always use it to End something prior. The Cycle will continue, what is "new" and what is "old" are very much not that different in reality, this situation will come back around again in time. But through the slight changes, the minor actions that take place within the story or "Myth" of the game Will lead to a better outcome.
That better outcome is represented in silksong, where hornet can stop the kingdoms people from completely dying.
They are pharlids modified by GMS
Exactly that's still good. Cuz I have an idea about certain lore but I still have too many questions
ohhh right there was that cutscene
ok ty this makes sense now 🙏 goated ty
I was asking for proof on when HK takes this stance not for a repeat of what you have already said
What the heck is "the myth" dawg
Grand Mother Silk told the Weavers that they were her divine children. First Sinner discovered they were, in fact, uplifted from the local pharlids, and were not her children as she said.
First Sinner was found guilty of apostasy, which is the abandonment of one's religious belief(s)
no?
it doesnt. Hornet literally talks about her distaste of the use of void and describes it as a destructive force of doom. It is in tandem with how it's portrayed in Hk as a force so dark and powerful that it's locked underneath the kingdom (heck, even your shade attacks you, and it's made of void)
what makes you think it "frees kingdoms"
Void was only not a catastrophe in Hallownest because the kingdom (and our goat pale king) handled it wisely
So First Sinner basically did nothing wrong? Why'd she wanna attack us then?
i see
that then makes sense with the whole gm silk creating lace mother complex whatever thingy
okok cool yaay ty
testing us
Void was never "locked underneath the kingdom"
shes testing you basically
The myth of the story. Every story is a myth. Civlizations rising and falling and repeating mistakes, Only the small things being different within those myths changing the outcome for the next time. When HK takes this stance? the entire Myth of the game is this stance.
ok what are you even talking about this point
im a big starpengu disagreer but this is just yap
does anyone remember where hornet's cell/carriage is located?
I agree the game is about civilizations rising and falling
But like... this doesn't address anything I said 
Thematics. This is why i don't talk about it Because It this is the endpoint of it.
Ok it takes this stance when the vvoid is introduced, when nothing consumes a kingdom and a husk remains.
yea i know not void but i mean the abyss lol.
mb abt that. but basically still, its locked so that only the king can access it in hallownest
There ,simpel terms
Void doesn't do that
It does when it matters. And it only matters when theres a will behind it.
Sure but it wasn't locked before then and nothing happened because Void chills (and in fact is implied to actively be receding) unless provoked
also guys i dont think im buying the acmi zine 💔 https://shop.acmi.net.au/products/acmi-guide-hollow-knight-silk-song-softcover
Created by ACMI, Australia’s museum of screen culture, this first-edition zine celebrates the artistry, world-building and lasting impact of Hollow Knight and its sequel, Silksong. Through rare materials and behind-the-scenes insights, it explores how a small Adelaide studio built one of the most iconic indie games of the decade. Featuring exc...
Void is hostile yes but only when its rest is obstructed
void is literally emptiness embodied. What do you mean it "frees kingdoms"?
its literally the most destructive force in HK universe!
It does not actively seek out to destroy kingdoms (Heck that's not even what it does in Silksong)
i really want to get it but shipping is over double the cost of the actual item wtf 😭
How did a place like Verdania crumble and the whole tribe going extinct? I knew it was something from the past but dunno what actually caused it
It doesn't destroy jack in Hollow Knight other than the Radiance
To reiterate what I said previously in the conversation:
Its tied thematically to the regrets of Hallownest and more specifically the Pale King multiple times
Getting Void Heart is representative of coming to terms with your regrets and the past
Coming to terms with the past is what allows The Knight to take responsibility for the future and free the kingdom from its stasis, placing void as representative of the end (Which is corroborated by it being referred to in terms of absence throughout the game)
Void was a force of good in HK and its neutral at best in SS
Yes and such is the folly Of the living, and their various uses for annihilation. It will always consume and take When tehre are Pale beings to use it. "the Darkness below our house" as the white lady says.
The pale beings are what do actively destroy kingdoms and they end up always coming back to void in one way or another
what are we even saying here
The idea of Void existing opposes the existence of Gods. It's kinda like a ying yang.
THe white Lady in SS establishes that the Pale beings and the void are interlinked throughout history in Red memory
She specifically says our family iirc which is obviously a nod to the vessels
i think she means bc they messed with void for vessels
Yeh I could get behind this
Exactly, likely since they both originated
Why else does the Everbloom exist?
that being said i would not be surprised if void is supposed to be a sort of "chaos" similar to greek mythology out of which everything is created
but we dont have anything confirming that
This is what i think. Pale beings are very much like Greek Gods
Them and the void exist in constant tandem as annihilation and creation.
LOrd of shades could be like Hades too. As per the Radiances "ancient enemy" line
We did see a glimpse of the lord of Shades along with the rest of the shades in SS act 3 ending.
that's because it's not used anywhere else other than to fight the Radiance? And are you forgeting that our shade is literally made of void and it attacks you on SIGHT. The void hurts you unless you got the Voidheart. And the entrance to access the domain of void, The abyss, in Hallownest is literally locked behind a big metal door that can ONLY be opened by the King of Hallowest. And the Godhome ending where the Void leaks out from Godseeker violently.
No red flags? Apparently Kingdom Savior omg use void save kingdoms kill bad gods wow.
Void does not actively seek out destruction ever (and i dont recall ever claiming it so) but it is a very destructive force that CAN AND WILL annihilate everything it touches if used irresponsibly (like the Snail Shamans did).
The shade isn't canon
its an interesting thought but i dont think its confirmed anywhere
The shade mechanic was actually made way before void was conceptualized
so does that mean steel soul is canonical
The abyss was locked behind because of the vessel project
That's also not true of the godseeker ending
DNM does the same thing then it immediately recedes and chills in the abyss
Yea that is pure speculation. But with the existence of everblooms as an established source tow ard off darkness and such, its what i believe.
Diegetically what it does in Silksong makes sense yes I acknowledge that
But my argument is that its incredibly nonsensical on a thematic level
They mad eit cannon through that development though
i just thought of something, one of the knights in hollow knight is said to come from a far land and that she brought a white flower with her, and we see white flowers in the cradle in pharloom, could she be from pharloom?
"Mysterious Ze’mer arrived in Hallownest from a serene land, bringing with her a collection of delicate flowers."
just because something comes first dosent mean its non cannon
Those are different flowers
i dont think those flowers are everbloom
Pharloomians also don't have the same dialect
damn
The everbloom does not take root in Pharloom
The snail shamans make that clear
Yes. They are, alas, not French.
Lifeblood would be worse than radiance if it could gain enough power to expand ?
I'm assuming the vessels manage to find a secret way out of the abyss after it was closed. The secret passage probably through deepnest where Nosk started preying on them. idk.
it is canon.
The shade is canon how it interacts with you in HK is almost certainly not canon because respawning isn't canon
Why would the knight attack itself 🥴
I can no longer like Trobbio
Lord of shades is the same princple as this. Godhome just shows us its probably something the knight can do with the void heart. So the 3 Trueer endings can all be
cannon (unless THK shows up at some point independent of returning to the void)
no? what theme do you imagine the void represents? it represents emptiness, hollow, in HK (imo). and it was shown the misuse of that force in SS, and i think that it was neat.
.
I mean, it did Likely Destroy the Ancient Civilization Due to their Obsession.
it behaves differently in pharloom because the atrocities are different. thematically yhr abyss reprsents regrets and thats why it exists in every kingdom
the same thing can embody multiple themes in different stories. How boring it would be if rain only ever was associated with sad scenes. That is very common yes, but that is not a limit.
The void is thematically different in Silksong, and that is GOOD. Pharloom is a different story, it's not about the knight anymore, so the void will indeed no longer hold the same meaning to Hornet as it did to the Knight
So why include it in the first place
Because its the same Universe? lol
Being in the same universe does not entail rehashing elements for no reason
why would you include rain if not to represent a sad scene?
yeah but we just established a reason
What is the reason
A red sun can mean different things to different people.
Arguing that the setting sun must always mean the same thing to EVERYONE is what is nonesensical
Well for a game focused on discovery its quite a shame that one of the core elements ended up being the same
i mean i would argue void does represent the same thing actually bc the ending of hk is inherently neutral bc nothing you are doing will allow the people of hallownest to thrive again bc theyre all dead
The anatomy of the world is not going to change. Like Socks says the thing will still always be there and represent diffrent things to diffrent pepole at diffrent points
that's so true
Void was never implied to always be in every kingdom
And in fact its inclusion retcons how Void Heart works so if anything it was the opposite
where in silksong your actions can make the people of pharloom thrive again
Also true
So like, the inclusion of void is unoriginal, thematically incoherent, and inconsistent with the first game. Its not good
hi I have a question anyone on why lumaflies are present in all the world
i think this is a really dumb argument to make when more kingdoms didnt even exist until 2018
like both ss and hk
Its an exploored idea. what in hollow knight says this cannot be the case?
i dont think any of the endings in og hollow knight are framed as good anyways, they are depicted as tragedies. silksong has a good ending and somewhat is about hornet showing a way things can be different. Its not that hard to understand
Well ants are on most continents irl too
yeah this is how i see it
It doesn't explore the idea
I think the ones in silksong are diffrent.
"Woaaah its the thing from the first game isn't that so cool" isn't exploring an idea its rehashing stuff for hype moments and aura
I genuinely think is a important question specially due to what happens to the Seer at the end of HK
hollow knights "true" endings are bittersweet
Well if hornet says it is possible that its everywhere if you dig deep enough , then yes it does?😂
silksongs true ending is good
I'm talking narratively
i dont think its rehashing anything though because Hollow Knight endings were never depicted as good at all, they were tragedies
Dream No More and ETV were very good
.
It doesn't embody much of anything in Silksong
SS has hardly any interesting or new themes
i would argue yeah in the context of what you are trying to do in the game but objectively they are bittersweet
dude City of Steel DLC is gonna RULE
shrue...
Laces despair?, regret of not being a good mother in GMS? The shamans Practically giving up on everyone?
they were not good imo they are tragic. it ended up that way because pale king didnt deal with things the best way he could have, or mother, creating vessels for sacrifice was always depicted as an "evil" thing
Yeah none of these are even hinted at 
Lace Implies she hates her mother in her first fight lmao.
No it wasn't
PK was up against an impossible task
...I know
Do you genuinely saw the area with 18838183 vessels broken and thought "oh pale king was right on doing this"
The bell hermit Is a nihilist, The caretaker hates pepole and the crone excludes herself from the pilgrims
He was yes
LOL
The point isn't that he was wrong its that what he was doing was impossible
You can't make an eternal kingdom
No way bro
Google the trolley problem really quick 
Won't take more than 20 seconds and will save a ton of time
Yeah the whole point is that it's a problem
It has a pretty clear ethical solution
.... A trolley porblem he crated himself?
it being a trolley problem or not doesnt change that he took an horrible option to solve it.
really in HK the Seer becomes a lumafly with essence, wich is dreams and wishes, the lumaflies liberate Hornet at the start of the game and you don't think is interesting?
Radiance did that
He is not irresponsible though.
The entire point is that if you do that you have killed someone
Oh that's not a lumafly at the start of the game its a different type of fly
To minimize suffering
Are we fr pretending the trolley problem doesn't have a clear better option in the big 25
what is it?
They're a new type of species that can break seals and stuff, iirc they're made out of silk?
So what are the major questions at the moment people are still trying to figure out the answer
Mostly GMS's actions
im ngl i also thought void inclusion was mostly for aura and hype moments but the whole point of the trolley problem is that it is an ethical issue with no actual solution.
Not what I'm saying, I'm saying that even that option involves you killing someone you deem a necessary sacrifice
I wouldn't say he was doing the right thing
I would say he was doing the only thing he could think of, it was a desperate attempt to save his dying kingdom and keep the people left alive and safe in some way, it wasn't the best route I wouldn't say nor a good thing to do but it was an idea that could fix things and minimize the kingdoms suffering, it's just the process he took was quite a bad way in moral standards
OK, but I was hoping we could maybe be slightly more specific than that
Yes
But minimizing the amount of lives lost is the clear better option so idk why we're saying PK was in the wrong for trying to do that
Why was Phantom abandoned, why did the weavers hate her
he had good intentions, but was pushed to desperate measures.
It seems like he really did love his people and tried to save them the best he could.
The path to hell is paved with good intentions, somewhat literally in this case with the abyss and all that.
Because the whole Scenario both he and the Radiance Crated is Wrong in itself?
generally, piecing a detailed timeline of the events
It was Radiance's fault
A trolley problem is inherently bad
No they were equally at fault.
PK wasn't the one torturing and killing his entire kingdom
i think what the pale king choose was not a good option at all though and it was not depicted as good ever since first HK. The Knight existence was always tragic - they were carrying a burden they shouldnt have been carrying. Radiance was the major problem but she was also somewhat provoked by pale king to begin with, pale king was somewhat doing colonization shit. Silksong is about Hornet finding a way of doing things that isnt as fucked up as pale king did somewhat too lol
He put his kingdom on a native peoples land😂 .
"colonization" is loaded language that implies his relationships with his neighbors were anything but diplomatic and willing
No he didn't
We're really just making stuff up now
Its true the vessel project was tragic but acting like PK was in the wrong or that it makes DNM not a good ending is insane
He didn't, he gave all bugs sentience did he not? If I remember right he acted as a light and guide for those he gave sentience
Are we going to claim any ending about banishing evil isn't happy because the evil existed in the first place
Because in that case most happy endings disappear
If we assume Crystal peak is the Moth peoples home, then he did turn it into a mine eventually through socio economic factors by absorbing the moth peoples tribe?
Moths willingly joined him they probably didn't care
hey what happened to #1 Groal Fan ?
Exhausted Pilgrim mogs him 😔
No, they forgot to care. Its not that they didnt. They just adapted to the times.
They went with the whole.
here's a moral question.
With two baseline assumptions, I want to ask you all something.
-
- Let's assume for the thoughts of this hypothetical that the pale Kings plan actually would have worked, obviously it did actually fail in reality, but let's just assume for this little scenario that for all intensive purposes, it would have been successful if done.
-
- let us assume for the purposes of this hypothetical that there was no alternative way of combatting the infection and the radiance, this was the only way for the purposes of this theoretical scenario.
The question now is: is the pale king in the right within this scenario? Did he do the right thing?
Or would it have been better to let it all fall to that plague?
||I ask this not to argue the "correctness" of the pale king but to put you in the mindspace of his decision making. Obviously there was no good outcome in this situation, Every angle was fucked.||
So there was no opposition to what he did from the people living there... What was the issue?
No one cared
There were. Markoth, Xeno, The seer. The old ways Were Diplomaticaly Pushed out.
They literally talk about raising thier nails against the king😂
Markoth and Seer do not
Markoth is his master
Proof
(The Pale King also presumably found records of the Ancient Caste attempting to rid themselves of emotion, which probably was what ultimately nudged him into that direction)
What’s so great about exhausted pilgrim
as far as I know, there's nothing in the game to suggest the pale king coerced the moth tribe to follow him beyond just being another bright light powerful being.
There's no indication that he was intentionally drawing them away from the radiance or anything. It seems like that's something they did willingly of their own accord.
thus the old "sin" seer perceives.
i find it funny that when void was coming to terms with your regrets in HK, yet in SS it is more about it BEING Hornet's regrets. Hornet clearly doesn't like the use (or being near the void), so it being the reason that the kingdom she was trying to save getting destroyed is quite the shock for her. She repeatedly expresses her resentment towards the fact that she caused the kingdom's downfall, and it was due to something she was well aware of the dangers of.
When she brings the flower from her memories, she gains new resolve to correct her mistakes and face the obstacles she had been avoiding/hating.
So void was the past haunting Hornet. Coming in full doom when she thought she had freed the kingdom of it's cursed, only to be met by the thing of her nightmares and witnessing losing the ones she came to care for. When Hornet dove into the abyss with the flower, the flower was mostly intact because Hornet was still confident. But after witnessing everything the void had done to Lace, Hornet's past caught up to her again, and the flower indeed disintegrated (it was a construct of her memories, so it makes sense)
But honestly, i can be wrong. The game actually have only been out for like what, 2 weeks? and the scale of the game is huge. So much undiscovered things, meaning still not understood of the things discovered, etc. i think i have only beaten it twice (and maybe a couple speedruns) so that is still not enough to completely draw conclusions. Not for me at least
so ye
i end my yap now and go to sleep lol
He really adds much needed depth to the Halfway Home
?
Well I think Crawfather is much better
Really I'm quite dissapointed that Creige has little dialogue and Nuu and Exhausted Pilgrim eventually end up leaving
Thanks for ruining the best area in the game TC smh
"Hey, looking at her light is cool and all, but like, there's this new guy, and he's got... Capitalism."
"Wait, shit, fr?"
basically the moth tribe
It’s only the best area in the game because the Craws are there
If I was William Pellen I'd have put a minigame there and made 5 new NPCs with hundreds of pieces of dialogue
and thats why i believe in the wider world of things dnm is bittersweet
nuu kiss dodge minigame
Nuu Dodge
If not for the Craws Greymoor would be GreyMID
Greymoor has Kratt though
Xero*
can we all collectively agree tho the flea that was doping in the festival shouldve been banned
that shits not fair your not allowed to do that
Why does Hornet hating void add anything to her character
not like he was ever hard to deal with
Reasons why Hornet is an idiot #527
what would be the 528th reason ?
but the fleas clearly have relaxed rules
Kratt is awful
idk about the integrity of the flea festival
anyway it would be so cool if the third installment in the series had THK as the protagonist
Hollow Knight: It's Actually The Protagonist's Name This Time
quirrel squirrel
i simply dont think Hollow Knight had any good endings lol. DNM was the less worse one but it was never good. It was simply tragic. Im not going to say how else pale king could have saved his kingdom or not lol but it is a matter of fact that what he did has to be seen as fucking evil. theres no hypotethical place where killing 1 million children would be justifiable lol. even in a supposes trolley problem this would be viewed as tragical and evil.
If we take Silksong into account it gets more obvious because it kinda posits that Pale King didnt take the best actions he could have, Hornet expresses hatred towards pale beings all the way through (and she ovviously also means her father) so i think its fair to assume that was NOT the best course of actions that could have happened in that kingdom lol.
She's weaverspawn
we should lowkey make these memes but with Hornet
HORNET reportedly FORGOT that PALE KING could make the VOID do his BIDDING (Wingmoulds Kingmoulds)
Nothing Directly tying Xero To markoth. But markoth Does mention That his past encounters with all of the above.
Also the seer has that long ass Dialogue about how she still Remembers and respects the radiance despite the pale kings rule. Does that make her wrong? No, it does not.
Pale King had a ton of sex and that ultimately led to both Hallownest and Pharloom being saved so
He's just THAT GUY
I am sorry to say this and please don’t take it as an insult but it seems as though you missed the entire point of the game
Morality is a system meant to minimize suffering so even though killing (really aborting) multiple people is bad its still for the greater good
i dont think i did but ok
Pale King's entire plan was sex but with magic involved
Seer never says anything of the sort
The view HK takes is that death is a form of purification, DNM is bittersweet yes but it is a good ending precisely because it allows the dead kingdom to rest
Is there any reason green prince is locked in sinner road lol? Did he lock himself outta shame? Also why did the citadel destroy his kingdom? Was it the architects?
HK was never about saving Hallownest, Hallownest died long before the beginning of the game
yeah this is my logic
"death is a form of purification" who invited the edgelord 😭
Being gay is illegal in pharloom have you seen how religious the kingdom is
It’s about freeing the rotting corpse of the kingdom from its stasis
Hollow Knight: The Hollow Knight
Grand Mother Silk reportedly HOMOPHOBIC
yes? I never denied that. Its still tragic and it doesnt have a good ending lol
death is like objectively bad imo so thats why hk is tragic to me
It is a good ending in the context of the game
"oh and he basically also upgrades your brain from a intel celeron to an i9 (latest generation)!"
":O OH MY GOSH!"
-# lmao idk, i always wanted to do this joke
yes same
in the context of setting a dead kingdom to rest
Death is not objectively bad
its a good ending
it is to me
Its her last dialogue. She calls her ancestors fickle. and says this Fractured kingodm is a result of thier actions
i mean the way it was portrayed in hk
All things die eventually, HK is a story about coming to terms with that fact
what about godhome flower.
Bro does not respect radiance at all
Death is not an inherently bad thing
She's basically just dissing the moths not PK
Hallownest was supposed to die long ago, what PK did defied the natural order
According to who
the way the vessels were done in hk is portrayed as pretty inherently bad to me
yeah, it's not great.
Vespa
The last follower of the Radiance and even she goes: "Yeah go kill that bitch she sucks"
yeah, but she's not the arbiter of what's natural.
"To rally against nature is folly, all things must accept an end"
Even PK's own lore tablet claims that he was denying time with the vessel project
She acknowledges That If the radiance were respected, even in the slightest, none of this shit would have happend.
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . .
are you fr?
a person hating something adds a LOT to their character. The fact that I dislike spices with all my heart will be quite important if i went out on a date with a person who adores chillies, for example
That is a different thing actually
That is quite literally the main theme of the game. PK’s hubris, the dream of an eternal kingdom, “to rail against nature is folly, all things must accept an end”, “ages pass and kingdoms fall”, “better, an end”
True pale king was a piece of shit regardless, it’s like how queen vespa said don’t fight nature, he tried to make hallow nest eternal and failed, and was completely wrong abt void all of those vessels had feelings.
Wonder how far his foresight was, did he foresee the knight stopping radiance
qhy should i accept what a lore table says lol
Because these things were put in the game for a reason
It’s not even just her
thats the whole deal with foresight
you can foresee a future and you can try to avoid it but it will happen
Vespa is the most direct, but Monomon, Mister Mushroom, and others have very similar dialogue
If multiple sources say that maybe eternal kingdoms are impossible and stupid maybe the devs are trying to give you a hint 
so all Weavers are stupid ? are you racist towards the Weavers ??? not cool. mods !
“what good to foresee a demise unaboidable”
they were put in the game to showcase viewpoints, not to make you see them and agree 100% with them
unaboidable
Yes but I wanna know if he foresaw the knight saving hallownest it’s confirmed he knew hallownesy was about to fall but it’s never stated how far he could see
I think this is really a media literacy moment ngl
Media literacy moment 💔
so true
SNAIL
Lore regulars have 1 braincell
and Hornet's dislike for void stems from the Pale King (implied), so its even more important than just "character A hates thing B"
Why does she hate PK
No reason
Making a character stupid for no reason kinda dampens the plot ngl
If she wasn't forgotten she wouldn't have "made the bugs dream of her" because its in a pale beings nature to dominate. If pale king respected radiance at all, why didnt he use diplomacy?
Ass father tbh
Pale King wasn't the one who forgot her
pk does not seem like a good dad
lowkey i dont disagree with anything youre saying hollow knight kinda presents that viewpoint but i simply never saw that as a good thing. its quite simple. but i think the vessels things is like portrayed as 100% objectively bad though i cant see anyone actually disagreeing with this
PK wasn’t really a dad to Hornet though
Herrah wasn't a good mother either
Im not saying that.
i mean she did what she could
PK wasn’t really in her life he wasn’t supposed to be
pk couldve 100% done more to be with hornet
That wasn't the deal
Anyone else felt bad after killing craw father like dude was just wanted to judge you and yeah that involved killing you but Hornet did kick start the apocalypse so
The terms of the deal were that he’d give Herrah a child, they weren’t sharing responsibility over her
Crawfather glaze is getting out of hand
at least she cared
at least she tried to be around
where the hell was PK huh
No, he tried to kill me!
We have THREE crawglazers in this channel
court of craws is like the council has decreed death
Still an ass father
And once hallownest fell the pussy ran off to white palace and rot there taking no responsibility
I get it, he was depressed after he lost HK but still
It’s almost like he wasn’t MEANT to be in her life
They politely invited hornet to just gang up on her
Tbf even hornet stated in the journal he wasn’t wrong
i feel like treating pk like a completely good and flawless figure is pretty crazy
What responsibility could he have taken