#It appears that mods do indeed stink
578 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
I think your opinion is cringe
@small root could you be more specific? What can mods do to stink less?
I haven’t smelled any mods myself, but usually showering helps with this kind of problem
🆗
🥹
damn didnt know, ill try to incorporate a shower into my annual routine
hello
@silver swallow will this do for a general place to complain? I can pin it
Can you type here or is it still closed?
Lol, I forgot about this thread
Hmmmm
i say that mods don't stink as much as six months ago fr
Epic improvement
only thing that changed is alfrik resign 
In six months ? I think more happened
That's the only thing that mattered 😔
ember left 😭
yeah
It's been more than 6 months
how many admins do we have left? four?
Five if you count Zoy in
yep
I don't 🙄
If you withdraw admins, there is 9 mods
#1042822527841476608
that's more than enough, actually
assuming that at least a third of them are active
More than a third is I'd say
I've only ever seen like 3 of them
So...
And idk if I would call them "active"
More like active once a week in chat
Except if you have every channels muted except #artist-showcase it's not possible
For today in 5 minutes I already saw 6 mods talking
And there's probably more
I bet you can't find more than 2 mods who didn't talk in a whole week
Ngl
I only use #artist-showcase
And these forums
And like #general exclusively at midnight to 2am
Ain't no mods except like sometimes quiss once a week active at that timeframe
Assuming you're somewhere in Europe, it's not surprising
Yeah, I kinda guessed that
Is there a place I can go to talk to a mod about some stuff?
dm @manic pond
^ He right
Smh
stink describes a bad scent. It's not interchangeable with a good scent. I believe you meant "smell".
This is hung hanged all over again
wdym the mods stink tho
No, they smell
Of dandelions and youth
Of butterflies and strawberry ice cream
Of daffodils and grass
Of all the nice things you can dream
Of chocolate and pudding
And perfume and spice
Of a cook's best meal
And other things nice
wait, do butterflies smell?
I smell of my own sweat after coding for 2 days straight
lol
Thank you
See they all stink
of sweat
Because they try
I'd say the scent of sweat from elbow-grease is a smell, not a stink.
Stale sweat is what stinks.
Nah I think it smells bad so it stinks
I guess that whether a scent is bad enough to stink or not is subjective.
bro youre a dumbass fr
no english content/vocabulary word has a single definition, and not even a single literal definition
scent, stink, and smell have areas aplenty of overlapping jurisdiction
yes, stink carries often with it a negative connotation, but a connotation is by no means a definition
to be prescriptive and pedantic as a vocabularian is smallminded and shameful
Tanya you angered the Grammar Nazi's
worse than a grammar nazi, tanya is a vocabulary nazi
and even then a poorly informed one
I'm gonna piss you both off: I make up new words
lovely!
this world's words are of containing multitudes
they remember previous incarnations and context
though stink indeed suggests a negatively charged judgement on the behalf of its speaker- it is merely that- a suggestion
a sea described to be dark as wine is not necessarily that sea travailed by ulysses
a 'stinking' stimulation of the olfactory sense by no means must be considered as unpleasant
to analyze words in their isolation is to kill any life they might contain
to kill words and compose stodgy poesy from their remains
i must say it sickens me
think you of how no man may go down twice to the same river
how then may any man read twice the same words
Okay so I was being pedantic making a joke because of the thread, but no, you're vastly misinformed. While yes, smell stink and scent do overlap when referring to the way we perceive an aroma with our noses, stink doesnt "often carry with it a negative connotation", it always carries a negative connotation.
Stink is objectively a "bad" smell (or action or thing). It cannot refer to a smell one likes.
What isn't objective is whether people think something stinks or not. I can think blue cheese stinks, but someone else can thing it's an aamazing smell. However, "blue cheese stinks" means "blue cheese smells bad", whereas "blue cheese smells/blue cheese has a scent" doesnt necessarily mean such.
I was trying to say "I believe you meant smell" implying that the moderators "do indeed smell" as oppose to "do indeed stink", because stink is objectively bad, whereas smell isn't.
"No English content/vocabulary word has a single definition" okay? Words still mean things. Idc what context you're using, stink doesnt refer to a positive. Especially not in this context.
"Stinking" is inherently unpleasant. A "stinking simulation" of the olfactory sense is a really weird sentence to use as an example though. But "Stinking simulation" wouldnt refer to the olfactory sense's perceived result, rather the result of the simulation was "stinking".
Its patently obvious that "stink" in this context meant "perform bad", but the topic went to smells when palanq sent it that way.
I was making a jest while showing my approval and appreciation foe the current mod team.
troleador
?
to take a word in isolation is to misunderstand it
stink can carry a negative connotation
Stink can also carry a neutral connotation
Okay, but you cant negate the meaning of the word at all? Pray tell what did you mean by this if not a poor simulation
Stink cannot carry a neutral connotation thats like saying bad doesnt mean bad
Words mean shit
Crazy story
to purport that stink is not interchangable with a good scent borders on illiteracy
Your example is comparable to saying bad can actually mean good.
Except it's worse, because depending on the speaker, bad can actually mean good.
Due to slang.
Unfortunately the slang of stink meaning good scent, or even good hasnt manifested yet.
slang in the first place is an absurd concept
stink carrying a negative connotation is a "slang" of stincan
Really? Cos thats only ground you had tooting on mate
What the deuce did you think "It appears that mods do indeed stink" meant?
all words are ""slang""

With all your english wisdom do tell me
i,cant,understand hald words here lol
i'm commentating explicitly on your statement of stink describes a bad scent. It's not interchangeable with a good scent. I believe you meant "smell".
well i can, just dont expect discord argumenta to use as much vocabulary
Yes, that is true.
Give me a few choice example of stink being used to refer to something pleasant
Like, objectively pleasant.
ok tbh, ive seen stink used.to amplify a good smell in a book i was reading
icr which one
i'm well aware the initial poster intended to imply the mods were unpleasant
i disagree entirely with your claim that it is always a bad scent
Intrusive
but it also worked cause it doesn't mean it
so its like bothxatxsame time
idk
my english is horrid so dont listen to my wonderful insights :p
That's just how english works, you're gonna find choice cases where it works due to other 1qualities of the smell being unpleasant
Like a waft of a love potion or something
The thought of getting intoxicated by such justifies "stink"
Every single dictionary on earth has "Stink" defined as "unpleasant smell" or something along those lines. What next you're gonna tell me stench can be pleasant?
the stinking posies in the morning
the stink of baking bread
the clear stink of a moonlit night
Ahh here we go
ngl that just sounds weird
nice to read an actually pretty decent debate lol, especially after #1053948585420521483
dictionaries are historybooks at best
stench is if anything more easily considered pleasant than stink
what chatgpt thinks:
It is possible to use the word "stink" to describe a good smell, but it is not common and could be considered unconventional or even humorous. "Stink" is generally used to describe a bad smell, so using it to describe a good smell could be seen as a form of irony or satire. For example, you might say "This perfume smells like a good stink" if you are trying to be funny or sarcastic. However, it would be more common to use a different word, such as "fragrance" or "aroma," to describe a good smell
I did forget irony.
ngl i think chatgpt got it pretty right
stink smell scent stench
all four are cognate, and in their most literal definitions entirely synonymous- emit a smell
some of these words have taken on bonus definitions from long-dead metaphors they once participated in, but that does not erase their equally valid other meanings
connotation is an important aspect of style but to conflate it with definition is absurd
I feel like other meanings have been erased tho, 🤔
idk tho
just stench and stink are used with good smells eith irony or when its overpowering to the point of bring bad
and whrncyou use it for foof itxmakes me think overwise
Idk what posies mean so I'll get that one last.
"Stink of baking bread", this is an opinion. The scent of baking, the aroma of baked, the smell of baking bread is what you would have.
The "stink" means the smell isnt something the like particularly liked. Its used particularly to emphasise that point.
Moonlit night is weird. "Clear stink of a moonlit night", do moonlit nights have a smell? I dont think you can associate it with a "good smell" as it depends on where you are. Also what foes "clear stink" mean?
Searched up posies and this refers to the intrusive smell of the posies. Unless those flowers smell bad?
Like redish said, these are very weird examples. They sound weird, because they're unconventional at best or wrong at worst. I had a hard time interpreting 1 and 3, that's how poor they are.
Long dead but ever alive and pleasant in current day English?
present or pleasant?
a freudian slip?
Idk how it coulda been
not the reply but the pleasant
it is a pleasing wordplay
Maybe. It's almost instinctive for me to try stuff like that.
Dictionaries are pretty good authorities on what words mean. They're updated regularly, and they do a pretty good job cataloging what words mean. When Hangry became used enough it entered the Oxford Dictionary, so labelling it as a history book is silly. Theres also sites like Urban Dictionary, which while not amazing, does a pretty good job at showing current slang and such, with a live like and dislike counter that anyone can use.
Discrediting dictionaries as history books is ab extremely wild take ngl
"Stink of baking bread", this is an opinion. The scent of baking, the aroma of baked, the smell of baking bread is what you would have.
I really do not see how one's word choice is something that can be corrected, except in case of a near-homophone to a poorly understood word (ie tyrian and tyranny)
Like redish said, these are very weird examples. They sound weird, because they're unconventional at best or wrong at worst. I had a hard time interpreting 1 and 3, that's how poor they are.
on what planet is there a wrong in writing
Oh those arent quotes from a book?
a dictionary can tell you what a word has meant in the contexts it has been found in
no two readings of a word are the same, its couching and its reader shape the experience
"On what planet is there a wrong in writing" when you use words incorrectly it's wrong lol.
I cant think of an example now its 6am but I can get you a few later. But if these were original examples, the use of stink in moonlit night is wrong (unless it doesnt refer to a smell?), and the use to describe posies implies the smell was intrusive or bad. (Or again, wrong)
the best dictionaries are etymological and peel back the layers of metaphor
Gibberish is a real thing you know... just cos someone understands gibberish doesnt make it not "wrong".
I'd honestly like to ask you this: what difference should it make were I to quote or compose?
So quoting would mean theres a wider context that I dont know. Ie the baker hates his job, or the flowers remind the smeller of their dead grandmother or something.
In those contexts, stink would make sense.
Whereas if you summon them out of thin air without additional context, they feel weird. Especially that third one, but i feel thats just the meaning going over my head.
Wouldnt that make the dictionary by definition a history book tho 🤔
Also isnt this an etymological fallacy? Stink may have once meant smell (?) but it now means unpleasant smell.
All dictionaries are history books, its just a matter of how recent they are
I mean technically
Etymological dictionaries are to be preferred, as they dig deeper than the surface level
But a 2016 oxford dictionary is gonna a have small differences from 2022 dictionary
But no dictionary can be truly up to date- language is defined by its users, not its recorders
Language is defined by the people who write and interpret it at the time it was written.
Otherwise gibberish has a meaning and we all just too dumb to understand it.
Which sure someone may have put those random words down with care but ultimately its exactly that, random words.
in all the contexts, stink is the tenor of a metaphor
Isnt stink an opinionated adjective
"The smell of baking bread" doesnt make smell a tenor of a metaphor in the context of the baker hating its job
Stink just works better because it adds to the environment.
Sentence structure matters when there are sentences
I'm trying to think of cases stink can actually be used to purely describe a pleasant smell and legit the only one I can genuinely think of is some farting fetish
"The stink of baking bread" is the sentence. I dont see how that's a metaphor.
that is not a sentence
i mean context of quoting vs context of original composition
But in the context
"Bob the baker hated his job. He hated entering the dingy building every morning. He hated the aching in his muscles as he kneaded the tough dough, the stink of the baking bread as it rose in the oven, the facade of smiles the customers donned. He wanted to be a builder instead."
Even here "stink of baking bread" is unpleasant. It implies the clothes are unwashed, or that the narrator doesnt like the smell.
this is you being prescriptive and pedantic
does stink often carry negative connotation? yes
must it be used along only unpleasant smells? no
See I disagree in the sense that it foesnt have to be used for smells but it has to be used for unpleasantness
Unpleasant show "This show stinks", or something
when saying that, my intention was not to imply you thought it could only be used for smells
ChatGPT had a pretty good point on the subject of it being used ironically, but otherwise no.
my meaning was that your opinion was when describing smells with stink those smells must be unpleasant ones
Unpleasant in some way - whether intrusive, repetitive, outright bad - to the perceiver.
The perceivers view on a stink is less than neutral.
If it was neutral or more so, smell, scent and aroma are applicable.
Oh
"He walked into the bar, greeted by the stink of alcohol. Despite not liking it at first, he'd grown to the smell" could work.
Ahh no even then stink is the narrators pov
perceiver is the speaker or the reader?
"that pleasant stink of a rainy day"
You smelt a rainy day before?
It's a not amazing smell but its refreshing
It's not nice but it's not awful.
It's a "stink" yet pleasant.
It's an oxymoron that works
it isnt an oxymoron
it could be an oxymoron if stink inherently meant bad
It does 💀
Alr that aside
"Pleasant stink" is because rainy days (at least to me) have a weird smell that isnt all awful. I wouldnt call it a nice smell by any stretch, but it's not entirely unwelcome. It gives the message of refreshment, which is obviously pleasant, but the smell itself isnt exactly good.
pleasant stink of vanilla extract
pleasant stink of freshly squeezed orange
you may prefer to pull out the thesaurus and replace stink with something else, but its a purely stylistic choice
Are these book quotes or not? Forcing "pleasant stink" we reach the same issue of it being an oxymoron. Doesnt really make sense with freshly squeezed oranges or vanilla extract, but the person smelling them may have some context that makes the smell somehow nostalgic or repetitive.
"Stink" can only refer to intrusive for vanilla extract and fresh squeezed orange both.
Again you can make sentences out of thin air but then it becomes wrong. The stylistic choice is either and oxymoron (which it is, and that's fine) or wrong.
there's no wrong in writing
dictionary-literal definitions of individual words sometimes help a reader understand what an author means, but far more important is the contextually derived figurative definition
And theres no context with your examples
And even then, there absolutely is a wrong in writing.
the context is "pleasant" "of {vanilla extract, freshly squeezed orange}"
Then you're using stink wrong 🙃
Idk what to tell you man
You can use a word wrong, its absurd to assume you shant
Oh damn I occupied the word shant wrong
Oh fiddlesticks she played with the number occupied wrong
Oh sucks I used either she or number wrong
O damn I used either wrong
funny enough the word occupied could work there
A dictionary cannot tell you what someone is trying to convey to you
Dictionaries tell you how influential users of the language have used words, which can be useful on occasion
Context is by far the most important tool
this isn't incorrect
Can and shant
You can its absurd to assume you shall not
Talking of inevitabilities, in this context is wrong
using can't and shan't conveys different things, but what by you was conveyed was by no means wrong
the main reason this might be incorrect is conjugation
Context is important, sure but that doesnt let you use words incorrectly without them being incorrect, unless theres some meta reference to said word being used as such.
Thats why "The stink of baking bread" required context to be correct.
Using stink as a stylistic version of smell is wrong.
Unless that smell is somehow less than neutral.
Pleasant stink is an oxymoron
what do you mean 'that doesn't let you'
Well technically the stink of baking bread is fine if you make the assumption the reader doesnt like the smell
language is not a science
I mean that wrong things are wrong.
You cant do something wrong and it not be wrong, unless theres meta reference to it being wrong for the sake of being wrong.
Like yeah you can be wrong sure
But its wrong
thats wrong
"He loved the stink of baking bread" (assuming not sarcasm) is wrong.
Well unless he likes it because its unpleasant
Which is weird but I cant rule that out ig
Would require context tho
has it been spoken? has the meaning been comprehended?
then the author is correct
the context is that he loved it
We would need to know what he loved it fr it to not be wrong.
Acc thays not true.
We could also take the narrators pov into account
Although bread isnt typically disliked
Weird case
Either way someone has to find the smell of baking bread unpleasant, else it's wrong.
An author can be wrong. This isnt like painting a picture, there are rules and meanings to every word used. Writing is art becuase there are so many creative things that you can express with it. That doesnt mean that it cant be wrong.
What if the writer barely understands English but doesnt realise that their understanding is shit?
The entire job of a proof reader is to catch wrongs, in spelling punctuation and grammar. The structure of sentences can be wrong. The words used can make no sense in the context used. The type of word may not have enough context to illicit such conclusion.
The reader is just as if not more important than the author.
any figurative usage is wrong?
because that's what you are saying
if it doesn't make literal sense its "wrong"
Is this a farmyard? Cos I'm feeling like a strawman after that argument
"pleasant eyes of night"
is this a wrong construction?
how can the night have eyes??? it doesn't have eyes???
Pleasant is what confuses me there
Figurative usage is fine. Stink isnt figurative in the context we are talking. This is a strawman, and I am not going to entertain it.
your definition of correct speech contains no room for metaphor
merely simile
?????
I literally have no idea what you're talking about at this point. I have no clue where what I said rules out metaphors, because I never said that.
You cant justify using stink wrong by being figurative. "She was a stink" means she was unpleasant :)
Like
Where does this argument even come grom
stink can't be a tenor for something pleasant
how can anything be a tenor for anything dissimilar to it
"she was a stink" is not a figurative usage
It's a metaphor
Give an example, because I do not follow.
and my metaphor couched more literally is that 'stink is of baking bread'
if my metaphor is 'wrong' on what grounds is any metaphor 'right'
Stink is not a tenor for baking bread
The stink of baking bread is not a metaphor.
Stink is an adjective.
what??
any given word can take multiple places in a sentence
here, stink is a noun
"the stink in the air was of baking bread"
Okay that's not a metaphor either
Jeez you come in here talking about how I shame linguists or whatever the fuck and u cant even get a straight metaphor?
simile is the valid method by which likening may occur by your definitions
This still makes sense, it means either something went wrong with the bread baking, or the perceivers doesnt like the smell*
Like that's fine
I do not see the issue.
what I wrote there was not a metaphor in this instance, because it was intended as an example to demonstrate how stink can be a noun
BUT IN THIS CONTEXT ITS AN ADJECTIVE??
????????
I give up
"stink is of baking bread"? stink is an adjective here?
2h
how??
Bye
it absolutely is not
in this example you have provided
the- article
stink- noun
of baking bread- prepositional phrase working as an adjective to modify stink (what kind of stink?)
of- preposition
baking- gerund, object of preposition
bread- adjective modifying baking (baking what)
all your justification has been "this cannot be correct figuratively, literally they are too dislike"
No?
An example of stink being used figuratively is when theres not actually a smell to be unpleasant.
why isn't writing like painting
genuinely curious
With a painting, all you need is a canvas, something to apply and something to apply with with. You can use ketchup and mayonnaise you can use water colours you can use potatoes you can use your fingers you can use your hair. You can put the colours on delicately or you can splash them on wildly, you can mix your colours and you can match your colours you can do literally whatever you want provided you have a canvas, something to apply and something to apply it with.
Writing isnt the same. You can have tour canvas, you can have your pens, you can have your words, but you must take care in the way you apply them if you want them to be not "incorrect". For it to hold meaning, you've got to construct something you (and people, but less important if you dont value such) can understand. You cant take German and mix it with English then slap a bit of latin there because you felt like it. You cant use past and present tense in a sentence randomly. You cant use the same word several times in a row unless you're writing about a certain animal.
A painting will always speak to someone. Writing wont unless it actually follows the rules.
does monet speak to you? pollock?
how is this still going on lol
ive coded an entire feature in a bot, and yall still arguing smh
the second half i can directly attest to its falsehood
No but Monet certainly speaks to some people.
E E Cummings is a great example
Or even shakespeare
or chaucer
Neither of those last two write by your rules
Can u drop an example? I searched EE Cummings and got https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poetrymagazine/poems/49493/i-carry-your-heart-with-mei-carry-it-in
Which seems fine to me
if what you say here speaks true, noone should feel spoken to by even the most rulefollowing historical writers- their rules were different than our own
this one especially i think is a great example
i could solve this by turning u both against me instead of eachother lol
i'd be suprised if you could devise such a position
lole
ok tbf im not completely on that stance, but i do find it a waste of time, its boring af for me
no that others wont find it fun
its just i dont like it
anyway at this point i think i got to the point where tanya has pretty much admitted my initial accusations
subjectiveness of writing means you are all right smh
thats why maths is better
arguments have actual answers
and u can pull out the i told u so
oh no both typing... gonma get trashed on lol
i mean i said
"you are being prescriptive and pedantic, positions as you have avowed to hold on stink/scent/smell run counter to the beauty of the written word"
we spent way too long struggling over if a particular phrasing was ""wrong"" or not without really bothering to examine each other's rubric
tanya talks about how language must obey certain precepts of style to hold artistic meaning and value
which like
yeah, ok, thats the anti-art position i accused you of holding
surely definition of a word.is most objective part of english, but that somehow devolves into opinions on writing style 🤔
this is why i hate it lol
english is wholly nonobjective
which makes it far too confusing for my smol brain lol
outside of very VERY specific jargon-circumstances
one of which unfortunately happens to be linguistics
what'd you think of ygUDuh @strange carbon
I'm tryna find a decipher of it so I can understand what it means. Ultimately I think it's stupid to act like this is something that proves you can take that freedom. I've written a msg explaining why but I dont want to post until i get the meaning.
Cummings has put text on a page and people* have endeavoured to give it a meaning. The reason these two inellgiable pieces of tosh mean anything is because people want them to mean something.
Poem, Or Beauty Hurts isnt that bad. Its written very uniquely to say the least, but at least it's clear to a degree what it's on about.
ygUDuh is E.E cummings literally using shortened words to the point of incomprehensible. People strived to understand what they could mean, and they've probably came to that write conclusion. They act like its revolutionary, and maybe it was, but personally I think its dumb if imma be real with you.
ygUDuh is comparable to text messages sent back when youd have to click a button multiple times to send your message. Because of that, messages were shortened. It wssnt unusual to see msgs frmd lk ths bcz th msg wz stl prtrd wl enf. And that can be understood. But calling that "writing" and not "code" is misleading at best. Its piggybacking off the language for convenience. Nothing wrong with that, but to act like "breaking the rules is hip" over inellgiable tosh like that, or ygUDuh is silly. Infact after searching, it seems the drove of slurred words was written as such so that when read in a New Jersey accent, it sounds like a drunken racist talking to sterilize Asian aliens. Which would mean that its meta wrong, so not wrong are all.
Inellgiable
Autocorrect moment
read it out loud
you gotta,
you don't
you understand,
you don't know
you understand them
you gotta get
you understand they're dirty
you gotta get rid of
you don't know nothing
LISTEN bud LISTEN
them
good
am(ericans)
little yellow bast
ards we're going
to CIVILIZE them
Civilize worms too
(Also reading allowed doesnt work in a British accent apparently)
My phonetic rendition of ygUDuh, a 1944 poem written by Edward Estlin Cummings.
On a side note, please consider the context of the Pacific War, during WWII.
(NB: a vague Southern NAmE by a Southern Italian)
somehow knowing what all words meant made it a worse read 🤔
it takes it out of the context
I've got to emphasise for first paragraph that I dont think Cummings had no meaning behind it, but that because readers cared to put effort into understanding it, it works.
nah its just a boring poem
in either form
i guess it is not the best example for a brit
The average person posting something like that would get overwritten for gibberish.
And even then this still doesnt apply to using words wrong. This is just taking the pronunciation, making it meta-wrong to illustrate a point
it is still breaking your rules though?
Its meta-breaking.
so whats a pollock then
whats a monet
whats a multimedia art
What's wrong with pollock and monet
whats a franglais poem
they broke those rules of painting directly analogous to the rules you suggest makes writing special
?
No, you didn't
Painting has no rules.
.
special compared to other areas of art
"A painting will always speak to someone. Writing wont unless it actually follows the rules."
python the poem 👀
you can make a case for anything "wrong" to be """meta""" wrong
"Speaks to someone" in the sense of art means to make them feel specific emotion.
tell me about shakespeare
does he speak to you?
in his failure to conform to the rules of your modern english?
To me? No. But Merchant of Venice speaks a story of cruel justice to quite a fair number including my mother.
Dude
Idk if you're the broken record or if I am
you say that painters need follow no rules to create art
I have no clue why you think authors do
.
Because otherwise it simply doesnt make sense, like physically.
Compare realism vs impressionism to so-called correct vs so-called wrong writing
End skin police weird
Go bag clean wall Wii curtain
Harry Potter sky
A haiku I just made
That happens to make no sense.
its..... perfect 😍
You can do that in painting and drawing.
and you can do that in writing too
But there are limits in writing.
This makes sense?
Is there any meaning you can get from this?
it makes more sense than many modern paintings and sculptures
not to say they aren't art of course
No, paintings and sculptures dont make sense to you, but they make sense and speak to someone. Theres no person who knows the English language who can extract meaning from what I posted.
Modern is just what the present likes.
i feel nostalgia for childhood pursuits
Generally those paintings and sculptures will have some intent imbued into them by their creator
Aye but they dont need to. Many a times an artist chooses to paint and just paints whatever. My mum does it all the time.
and I never said I didn't connect with them emotionally, just that there are some paintings I have connected with less than I have connected with that haiku you composed
There doesnt need to be a meaning behind it.
there doesn't need to be a meaning behind writing either!
??
writing to evoke emotion need not be writing to convey information
What is language if not a way to communicate? Every language in the world has a set of rules. Words mean things, that is the very foundation of what allows us to communicate.
smh imagine thinking about emotions
Whether you're singing a song about green bags or writing a children's book
Theres a meaning
and even when there is a meaning, it need not be conveyed according to the so called "objective" rules of purists
Behind the sentences
purists?
is that a thing lol
(tanya is one)
🤔
stink CAN'T refer to something pleasant because that's WRONG
i mean ive haf 0 grammar here and usenwring word.constantlu no one cares
like what i just wrote, uttet failure
but no one (invluding tanya) cares
I've given credence to irony.
it doesn't make sense that the eyes of the night can be pleasant
Depends on what the eyes of the night is
no it absolutely does not
How the deuce are you describing something as something when you dint even know what it is
The eyes of the night stink
Doesnt really make sense unless we know what the fuck the eyes are.
because some things are always left up to the reader to interpret
Like yes "pleasant eyes of the night" as a sentence makes sense and is correct
No?? pleasant eyes of the night is not a sentence
Eyes of the night, whatever the deuce that is, can be pleasant*
ngl at this point i think i can say english is a waste of time :p
fragment at best
fragment or not it makes sense.
you lot have gotten now where, ive made an entire anonymous system on a voting bot
but if its the pleasant cankersore of the limb it cannot make sense! the dictionary says cankersores are unpleasant!
smh
But you can only retrieve cryptic meaning from it without anything more
why not?
they're pleasant and they are the eyes of the night
all the reader needs to know
Well I know what a canker sore is(?)* and no, canker sore isnt necessarily unpleasant. It can make eating unpleasant but it's not inherently unpleasant.
Stink IS inherently unpleasant though, it is literally defined as "an unpleasant smell".
why do you insist on trusting dictionaries over context?
Eyes of the night, whatever the deuce that is, can be pleasant*
But you can only retrieve cryptic meaning from it without anything more
Because words mean shit I'm sorry
Otherwise why cant I use the word stink as a stylistic choice for desk fan
of course you can
your desk fan has a scent to it
But that doesnt make me not wrong
unless you are saying pointing to it and calling it a stink?
Yeah, that works
Or why cant u replace turned with sti k?
I stink my desk fan on to cool me down
I can, but its wrong
And me doing it doesnt make it not wrong.
Unless I express awareness of the fact it's wrong somehow.
The difference between swapping stink for smell and stink for turned/deskfan, the author's meaning is not hidden in the former
Hidden according to what?
Who says its hidden?
What authority?
Ah I know
Dictionary
Issue is
If not dictionary then what?
Context isnt enough to derive the meaning from words.
dictionary isnt authority
the context
it represents what ppl think
not ehat ppl should think
if theres a discrepancy its the dictionary thats wrong
Aye because words mean what people take them to mean at the time they were written
not the person
if the author wants to make their meaning obscure for obscurity's sake, thats cool
no, its cringe :/
not cool as in positive social credit, cool as in still being art
And "The stink of baking bread" (with bread being pleasant) wrong, but it's also fine. Again using it doesnt make it not wrong.
I've got work.
what does wrong mean to you?
it can't be breaking dictionary rules because dictionaries don't have rules
it can't be breaking grammar rules because content doesn't matter to grammar
in short- english is a pyramid scheme
english degrees get you 1 marketable skill- english teacher
being an english teacher isnt a skill
lmfao
Tl;dr : mods suck
we all do
This thread is amazing
mods are mods
(they moderate)
I thought they modified
no those are mods (different)
I can modify your jawline if you want
(with a brick)
Is there a way to get mods for mobile?
Yeah
Would be very interesting, would allow the devs to gain ideas to fix broken game mechanics and glitches and make some tribes more even and give them better ideas for new units
Lmaooo
ppl keep asking for it lol
and it would be so good if they did add it
👀
This post is becoming more and more relevant by the day
Mods are da best! :DDDD
Maybe
i wish the penguin revolution had succeeded
Ok
Peng
👀
True
okeh
true
true
scary
Scari indeed
hahahah
gutbye am getin ban
deleting it makes it worse
should i ping again? xd
no need
ghost ping?
ye by looks of it
ping
Pong
Pang
hahahahahahahahah
