#Do you want to see more of S.H.I.E.L.D.?
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
It's honestly kinda surprising how little SHIELD was actually used in the MCU
The OGs
Same
Coulsen...
Skibidi
Because cool đ
i need to finish aos first
quality in story sorta drops off but it's a really fun watch overall yk
No
same
I want Maria back đ
No. Secret Invasion ruined both SHIELD being interesting and Fury
even though they weren't my absolute most favourite of the bunch, i'd love to see more adventures with Mack, Yo-Yo, Piper, and Davis
everybody else (aside from Daisy + co) have a far more settled-down life
Fr
100%
All of them
i miss fitzsimmons
I feel like this is a good way to bring Old Man Cap back
I don't think so... With present Marvel situation they won't do that
Cap character has been one of the finest characters and they won't disturb that character. Chris Evans mentioned that too..
I love AOS so I wish theyâd done more with that cast other than just the show. I know it was 7 seasons but I feel like they sort of deserved more from the MCU, even though it technically wasnât âcanonâ because they went to another timeline, but because of whatâs been introduced in the recent mcu movies, isnât it technically canon now?
I absolutely love Cap and respect that, but they need to stop pretending like Steve is dead.
They mentioned Steve after end game in fatws that people speculating that he is on the moon. But they haven't neither he's dead nor he's alive.
They shouldâve started FATWS off with Steve Rogersâ funeral
I kinda hate the moon stuff TBH. Theyâve done absolutely nothing with that and I know this was something the higher-ups pushed onto the FATWS director because they didnât want to commit to him being either dead or alive but it sucks
Really shouldâve started FATWS off with Steve Rogersâ funeral making Cap Americaâs legacy weigh that more heavily on Falcon and Bucky
lmao I never interpreted the moon stuff as anything more than an in-universe conspiracy
It's literally the same kind of reaction that people would make irl if a very public figure is announced dead with no further details
People are gonna start theorizing shit and some people are gonna start believing it and suddenly you have a conspiracy
I didn't see that moon comment as anything more than that
Same here bro
I know that and I think thatâs what the creators are going for. But what Iâm saying is that they probably would have actually said he was dead and began the show on his funeral if they werenât prohibited from doing that
Steve shouldnât die though
He can be talked about
Dead people are talked about too
Do you know how many Hitler memes there are on the internet?
Do you know how many people still say âRIP Chadwickâ when talking about Black Panther?
I mean honestly that's not the creators' faults, it's the fault of the whole subsection of the internet who reads so deeply into everything that they don't realise that not everything is supposed to hint towards something
True... It's jst a conspiracy even in the mcu only people believe that no one correctly knows nothing and they just left it with ambiguity
Imo they probably should have talked about his funeral to make it more clear, but like they really didn't need to in order to tell their story
And again anybody believing that Steve's actually on the moon based on that one off-handed comment really didn't get the joke
I say itâs the fault of the higher-ups who didnât allow them to say that he was dead. They caused this.
The similar thing is after Steve woke up, we don't know what happened to Peggy but they did show it in the next movies.
She's someone who showed a way through Steve's situational trouble at that moment.
May be they will use him as a background person who guides falcon through his tough time being captain America.
Again the moon thing was probably the furthest they could go in-terms of addressing Steveâs whereabouts because they didnât want to confirm him being dead or alive. They wanted it ambiguous in-case Chris Evans ever decided to return as Old Man Cap
âMay be they will use him as a background person who guides falcon through his tough time being captain America.â I would be totally down for that and not just for Falcon but for the New Avengers as a whole. He could be like an adviser/mentor/guy-in-the-chair figure for them. But my problem is that you have it one way or the other, donât say âHe might be on the moon but he might also not be on the moonâ and move on. That shitâs annoying, pick a lane
He can be mentor for the successor he chose.....
What I say is that iron man brings spider man to the table and mentors him. He didn't mentor every young person or new person in the team. Likewise Steve who chose falcon to be his successor helps him not lose who he is rather than meeting everyone's expectations.
If he's plays the guy-in-the-chair figure it doesn't stands for Steve.
who knows
They might never touch Steve's character ever.......
Ambiguity.....
They might never touch Steveâs character ever. Ambiguity.

Itâll just be one of the many other things in Phase 4 & 5 that was introduced and immediately forgotten
I imagine that a lot of these types of things aren't actually forgotten
It's just that from a storytelling perspective, they don't see much point in clarifying a lot of it
Thatâs even worse
Considering clarifying it doesn't really do much for the character's story nor the story that they'd be trying to wedge it into
Steve being alive or not doesnât matter to his story. CoolâŠ
For who? Steve's story is already complete, it doesn't matter if he's dead or retired or whatever else because his story is done and finished
If heâs alive, it shouldnât be the end. And if heâs dead there should be an open acknowledgement of it
Whatever they might choose to mention will impact his story but considering his story arc was already completed in Endgame, it's not going to contribute any significantly positive addition to his story
I think what they've done is that his story was the end and it doesn't matter what he does later because he's already reached his conclusion with his involvement in these stories
Acknowledgement would be nice but I can't see the necessity of it
The point is that he's reached his conclusive end within these stories
Absolutely true đŻ. Good pointâïž
Iron Man 3 was written to be a conclusive end to Iron Manâs character in-case RDJ didnât sign on for more movies. By that logic is it now a mistake that Iron Man came back for AoU, Civil War, Homecoming, Infinity War and Endgame?
No. Not a good point. Characterâs stories can be concluded but that doesnât mean it canât ever be continued in any meaningful ways
Hardly a mistake, just simply that if he didn't return there wouldn't have been any issues
I don't feel like Steve needs to be given an unambiguous future at the moment
They can simply just never bring him back and there's really no problem because his story is complete
And they still leave the door open for him to return but not with any promise of it
But like they don't need to make a decision now and making a decision now isn't going to improve his conclusion in Endgame in any much manner
It isnât going to affect him in Endgame but itâs going to effect lots of future projects badly. It already has.
I really don't see how it has
There has been absolutely zero indication of his presence affecting any of the stories
Because if heâs alive he should have been given something to say about Falcon giving up the shield or Buckyâs guilt about being the Winter Soldier or Falcon reclaiming the shield by the end of the series and if heâs dead lots of missed opportunities for both Falcon and Bucky to talk about that
I mean that would have been a great opportunity to have him there
But then again was he even needed
It isn't his story and he's already left his legacy
The actor left
The character is part of the universe
And still is part of the universe
Well yes clearly he did
But it wasn't Steve's story anymore, it was Sam's
And there was definitely a place for Steve to continue being a part of it
But I didn't ever feel like Sam was needing Steve to tell his own story
Yes and Steve has a lot that he shouldâve contributed to that story
could've, not should've
Steve wouldnât be telling his own story. He wouldâve been helping Samâs
No shouldâve. Definitely shouldâve
Steve not being there for either of his friends when they needed him damages his character
Sorry I didn't word that right - I didn't feel like Sam was needing Steve for Sam to tell his own (independent) story
Why does sam and Steve get together in the first place it's their way of thinking that Steve saw himself in falcon so why does falcon need Steve for him to correct
That's what FATWS does right
Showing what falcon and bucky are without Steve.
That's a fair point, but I thought I remember the whole point of TFATWS was Sam and Bucky growing out of Steve's shadow and figuring out who they can be without always depending on Steve
But the entire story revolves around Steveâs legacy and Samâs doubts about being able to carry that legacy. Donât you think Steve should have a say in helping encourage Sam that heâs worthy?
Steve already did, in Endgame?
He didn't leave them in crisis
He gave him a responsibility to lead the way
And it didnât work. Well tried once, itâs about time he abandoned them
And because of that he shouldnât help them in any way anymore even though something clearly went wrong. If they fail, they fail
I do get your point, there's definitely a place for Steve within that story
But if Steve was present, they'd be telling a rather different story, because Sam then isn't independently undergoing his own character development if Steve is just always going to hold his hand the whole way through
Heâs not. Heâs has to be there when they need him. Itâll still be about Sam taking on the shield and independently becoming Captain America. Just donât make Steve an asshole who abandoned his friends
Honestly really still did not get that impression that Steve's being "an asshole who abandoned his friends" - it feels almost the same as asking why other Avengers et al aren't present to help their friends in other stories, it's just simply that he can't be present so he's not involved
It would really only feel like a betrayal to the character if it was an express intention that Steve is now avoiding them
In the show it seems pretty clear that both Sam and Bucky have made peace with that Steve isn't able to be present for them anymore
In analogy terms, imagine a student who had tutoring sessions and because of that by the end of the semester they succeeded with flying colors and got honors. Thatâs still their achievement. Just because Steve would try to help Sam doesnât mean that Sam doesnât earn the title of Captain America
Okay. Why canât he be present?
Is he dead? They donât say he is
Is he doing something? They donât say he is and if he is wtf could be more important than his best friends?
From the siloed perspective of the story of TFATWS, there's really no reason why they need to explain it
I feel like we've just circled back to the beginning of our discussion
We have because you still donât understand that Steveâs whereabouts is very important to this story. Him being here changes the events drastically and him being absent creates a giant rift that he shouldâve been able to help fix
And plus him not being here creates damages to his character for not caring enough to help his best friends
Itâs like Doctor Strange not being in Wandavision but much worse
I understand what you're saying but I just simply don't agree that the story is lost without it
And when juggling characters like these, I don't feel like ignorance towards something like Steve's presence is irrevocable damage to his character (compared to intentionally pushing for these ideas)
Itâs irrevocable in the sense that there will always be that stain there. Of course you can always add more information (in-this-case squares) in the future to help draw attention away from the stain but itâll always be there because of their unwillingness to commit to what happened to Steve
timothy3156 has been timed out for 2m 

Reason: Similar-Messages Spam
Dammit message editing. Noted.
Sorry, not sure how to get the bot to differentiate between frequent edits and just sending multiple messages
Bobbi, Hunter and Mack.
Who the f voted for no you don't want more context
Coulson
I think it would be very interesting to see more S.H.I.E.l.D story lines.
they should make AoS canon
dont know how that would work with Bobbi being Clints husband but oh well
Bobbi's with Hunter in the show
The Bobbi x Clint thing is only in the films
That... what?
No it's not that
Laura Barton's SHIELD codename is Agent 19, which was Bobbi's in the comics
But Bobbi in AOS is never referred to as Agent 19, only as Mockinbird
But Laura's name isn't Bobbi
oh alright
I think itâs probably time to just let SHIELD die
Thereâs too many organizations doing exactly what they did in the MCU
Bring back Coleson!
