#Do you consider Civil War a Captain America or Avengers film?
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
should have been an avengers film
Shut
had no specific focus on Captain America himself honestly
Well, Technically
i think they just wanted to end his trilogy with a final movie lol
A Captain America film ig
An Avengers film, since Steve has less focus and more focus is on the changing status quo for superheroes and the drama and break-up of the Avengers.
i think it was called captain america cause it was Steve VS. Tony
but still had all the avengers except Thor and Hulk so Avengers film
I feel like a Captain America film is its own self contained story for the most part that doesn’t include many familiar heroes unless needed
Civil war isn’t that
so it’s a avengers film that just has captain americas name slapped on it
A part of it focuses on Bucky but the other main part focuses on Steve vs tony
it’s technically a avengers film
I feel like civil war tho could’ve been done a lot better but it did it’s part in the ongoing story
Pretty much
It focuses on many hero’s that are from the avengers and introduced new ones to the mcu
Like Spider-Man and black panther
Tbh I watched it as a kid for Spider-Man cause he is my fav superhero lol
I ligit didn’t care about black panther or the other characters
Just Spider-Man
It was like Avengers 2,5
Definitely not a "Captain America" movie, it was about most of them
it’s literally titled Captain America: Civil War. it’s more of an avengers spinoff
I see it as an avengers movie which is focused around captain America
Like how infinity war is focused around Thor
Its basically an avengers movie that they accidentally named captain america
Its totally an avengers movie
The freakin avengers battle and the two main guys (tony and steve) get in a fight
Avengers civil war
It’s a captain America film cause he’s highlight
Civil War was an avengers film
Cap 
Although it was named a captain america movie him and iron man share almost the exact same amount of screen time.
You could have called it iron man civil war lol
No, the film was good the way it was
What are you saying no to?
Also which side is right? Cap or iron man
No objective truth its just interesting
I would say captain america is right because our government is corrupt as hell
Where do you live?
As an American
I can agree with you
America
I say Cap myself
If you wanna regulate superheroes fine, but maybe regulate the corporations first
It’s called Captain America: Civil War, it’s automatically a Captain America film from the title but it’s a Captain America film with the Avengers in it
Woah, what happened to the bot? 💀
Third film should've been serpent society
i mean... the focus isn't even on captain america lmao
Captain America is the most important character in the film and 99% of the movie is revolved around him, not sure what you’re referring to
he really isn't the most important character in the film lol did we watch the same movie
it genuinely felt like an Avengers movie
doesn't make it bad, it just felt more like an Avengers movie than a CA one
Let’s go over it
- Captain America was the main character
- Captain America broke up the Avengers
- Captain America tried to help Bucky
- Captain America didn’t trust the accords so he split the heroes
- Captain America broke out the Avengers that were imprisoned
Many other reasons, what exactly isn’t about Captain America in the movie?
u just listed things he did? i can also list things Hawkeye did in the movie, or Vision, or Black Widow, Iron man
does that make them the main characters?
I listed the most important parts of the movie, but again what apart of the movie doesn’t involve Captain America?
what part of the movie doesn't involve Iron man?
So you aren’t going to answer the question? Deflection is pointless
-
Tony Stark agreed with the accords
-
Tony chased after Bucky
-
Tony insisted on keeping the team together
-
Tony fought against Cap when he didn't sign the accords and went against them, as well as both him and Bucky when he found out Bucky murdered his parents
-
Tony put the Avengers who didn't sign the accords in jail
It’s a Captain America movie chief
i am asking the same question about iron man... because with your logic, he is the main character too but its just his name that isnt in the title
i am not debating that Captain America has no screen time/importance, i am just saying other characters have similar importance and use in the plot
The only difference is that I’m making a valid point on why it’s more if a Captain America movie than it is Iron Man’s, that’s including the title
therefore it does not feel like his own solo movie
Ok, so are you saying it’s an Iron Man movie?
ok but the question isn't about the title lol it's about the movie itself
bro
what
how is that what you got from what im saying lol
Movie title is apart of the movie, in fact it’s the most important aspect of a movie
it was just an example for a character that had similar points and importance in the plot like Captain America which you used for him to prove he is the main character and therefore it's his own movie
It’s a question
imagine saying the most important aspect of a movie is its title
LMFAOOOOOOO
Ok? Is it not?
can u please read ur messages twice before u send them
Could be an ironman movie by that logic he has the same amount of screentime as cap
Also spidey is introduced how is it not an avengers movie
Movie titles must be completely irrelevant, and definitely not the main point of what a movie is
never said they are irrelevant, but they are not the most important aspect of a movie LOLL
^^
Tell me what I said that was wrong for you to be giving that advice
Sarcasm chief, secondly how is it not the most important part of what a movie is about?
"Superman movie is not the most important part of what the movie is about" literally what does that mean? u didnt even specify WHAT in the Superman movie is the most important part
you say it's sarcasm and then you continue to push your point about it being the most important part of a movie
^
i have no idea what you're trying to argue at this point, you're spewing nonsense
Yes, a Superman titled movie is the main aspect of WHAT the movie is about and everything DERIVES from the title
That’s the entire point of titling
you didn't say that in that message, you didn't say the word title at all lol you just said "Superman movie"
This argument is crazy what 😭
again, i never said it was irrelevant or useless, i said it is not the most important part of a movie....
The sarcasm part was on me mentioning the part where it’s irrelevant lol
i have no idea what he's trying to prove at this point
👍 💯
That’s entire point I was making this entire time
Superman was just an example
we didn't even speak of the title as the main point at the beginning, though
but okay
💪
this is really pointless because we're going nowhere lol
How is that relevant? It’s a point that was brought up regardless, and as long as we establish that titles are the most important aspect of a movie then my point stands
If you say so lol 💀
because you said it was the entire point you were making the entire time.... it wasn't the entire point
Yes, the entire point the entire time was on movie titles and the importance of it, Superman was an example of that…
Maybe you misunderstood, it happens
he's claiming that even though Captain America and Iron man hold the same importance to the plot and are both very main characters, the only reason that Captain America 'wins' is because of the title
when we're talking about the content of the film, not the title
i am talking about the beginning of the conversation
This argument is wild
I’m saying Captain America is more important and it’s his decisions that are the main focus on the movie
Thanks
how is this the point of your title importance rant
From the accords/ to Bucky/ to him separating the Avengers
feel like a summary was necessary 🙏
Again, that’s not relevant since you fixated on the title aspect of my point
lol do i really have to repeat myself
JFKIOEWNJFHEIuowg
YOU SAID THE TITLE
AND THE IMPORTANCE
were ur point
wtf
can you not scroll up and re-read what i said instead of bringing up the same topic and having the same conversation we had literally minutes ago
I was clarifying my point since you misunderstood what I was arguing
I’m going to be honest, calm down chief, stop being condescending and questioning people’s intelligence
"title aspect of my point"
Yes
u literally said the entire point the entire time was on movie titles
Because it is…
i am trying to understand why you're repeating yourself like a broken record
then why did you say "the title aspect of my point" if it's literally the whole point
Because when you’re trying to tell me what my arguments are without understanding then it’s my job to correct you
It’s simple
Because it is the entire point, from my first message on the topic, I mentioned the title and everything else were sub points
But it also includes the enitrety of the avengers and the plot is about the avengers and their break up
The movie is about the avengers it even introduces a few new members
we shouldnt only focus on the title character and ignore the resr of the film
Avengers civil war
Lmfao, W deflection, seem great at it, stealing the video too 💀
it isn't "W deflection" there is quite literally no point lol
you're the one deflecting and focusing on the title instead of the actual film
^
Lmfao only someone who lost would say that 💀
I spoke on both chief
"chief"
yes i totally lost you are so right
this is completely and totally only a Captain America movie
for sure
i am sure in this discussion, that i lost
Fr he and bucky the only people in the movie
W deflection 🥺
Anyway, thanks for the acknowledgment, all I need 💀
real!!! they the most important cause yk, Captain America is in the title...
Ikr
it doesn't matter that other characters held the same importance and even screentime.... Captain has the title so he wins fair and square
And yes, it says so in the title, Captain America guest starring the Avengers 💀
W take
again only using the title as your point
ok!
“Only”…riiight
I didn’t mention anything else
I mean it is your only point everything else is built off it or can be easily argued against
u did, but they were counter-argued (corrected myself cause idk English the best) because both me and Nexus explained to you how other characters are also just as important
My entire point was on Captain America having the most important role, not that anyone else is as important, that’s just false, the title is just my main point with other examples and sub points
That’s not the only point I made though
He does have the most important role but that doesnt make him the only focus
W take, which is exactly what I’m saying
Why’s that exactly?
I agree with that
replied to ur own list of Captain America actions with iron man's
where i replied to your other point
like i said
repetitive
Civil war is easily a mini avengers film
lol real
Real
I personally wouldn’t say that it’s as important as Caps, but that’s understandable
Captain marvel 2 should hve also been a mini avengers film and the super skrulls could hve been the enemies instead of what they did for secret invasion
But I don’t mind The Marvels
Sure, but with a Captain America title and with him being the main character with the most important role
thanks for acknowledging my point at last lmao
i have a feeling it will be a letdown
No problemo 💪
I mean it was basically an avengers film instead he was the lead role
Now that’s pretty accurate
I don’t the trailer looked great I’m hyped
Hello
It looks cool
U were probably on the sexiest side of marvel where they glorify men and bash women especially Brie Larson but from a spectator POV the trailer looked great
idk it feels underwhelming to me, maybe bc i've been disappointed by most of the last movies
no i'm really not lol
i love Brie Larson, i just don't think this movie will be good based off of last projects
Oh hey same name
People keep saying this like if spider man Shang chi black panther and guardians 3 don’t exist
Ofc ofc
people have different taste? they can like and dislike different things... also, spider-man was only good because of the nostalgia effect of it
We as fans need to remember that the infinity saga and avengers endgame took YEARS to build and u can’t expect to love everything marvel puts out
no... there is reasons as to why they're failing right now, you don't have to completely ignore every form of criticism just because you're a fan
Nahhh the story the acting the plot 10/10
Hell yeah
plot definitely not a 10
i loved it, but i'm aware it had flaws lol
Ive liked most marvel projects so far this year
Lmao marvel isn’t failing the fans just hve weirdly high expectations like if every movie is gonna be the next endgame or every show is gonna hve some big crossover
That’s exactly whats happening
no... not at all. Thor 4 is a perfectly good example
Lol the plot was great where are the flaws I don’t understand
the workers are being overworked and put in awful working conditions to push out projects like a factory and it gives us products like this. the CGI workers that produced Thor 4 literally said this
and that's why there is a writers strike
Yeah im very aware of the strike
I support it completely but people do have too high expectations
So u actively acknowledge that not every marvel project is gonna swoop u off ur feet’s yet ur complaining about marvel content being bad lately I don’t understand y’all honestly
Im not complaining
Doctor Strange was a complete dofus, as someone who is meant to be one of the greatest sorcerers - him fucking up a spell like that was completely out of character and just dumb, some of the villains teleported into the MCU didn't even know who peter parker was so therefore them teleporting there made no sense...
i came with VERY low expectations to Antman 3 😭 and i had none for She Hulk or Ms Marvel....
i am not doing this to hate, i genuinely loved Marvel
I feel so bad for the writers and cgi artists
All the villains knew who Peter was lmaooo😭😭😭 and also Peter was the once who messed up the spell when he kept adding changes to it
Ive gone back to the comics at this point
exactly... there's a reason the quality is bad. we used to get marvel movies every longer periods of time and therefore they let their quality be higher because they could be worked on for longer
Isnt he like 17
Ms marvel was great lmaoooo sometimes I wonder if y’all r actually fans or just movie critics 😭😭😭😭
Like I can acknowledge when something is bad but calling everything bad is overdoing it
I liked ms marvel but i like other stuff better
Doctor Strange should have known to ask him that question before he started the spell... he has a brain. also, did you watch the Spider-Man movies? Lizard (Connors) didn't know, Electro didn't know who Spider-Man was under the mask, he literally finds out IN No Way Home...
"i thought you were gonna be black"
People so scared to admit that Ms marvel was actually a good show
The only two marvel projects i hated are shehulk and dark world
Everything else i enjoyed
i am not calling everything bad, and also like I said earlier people have different tastes....
you don't have to be blind to bad aspects of Marvel just bc you're a fan
it wasn't the best
.
Thor 4? Antman 3? MoM? 😭
LMAO real
Omgggg when y’all analyze the stupidest details y’all really drain the enjoyment out of these movies
I liked MoM actually
Idk i thought it was cool writing could have been better
There are worse mcu projects
it isn't the stupidest details... it's literally the plot mate
I’m not blind I just don’t criticize everything down to the flesh
it isn't down to the flesh it's outright the plot lol
It is the stupidest detail because who is even paying attention to that
well i mean, each to their own i guess
many, many people lmao
the "stupidest" details are important
i'm not forcing you to change your opinions or say you have to dislike it, not at all
Yeah he was very out of character in that movie
but i am saying people are allowed to criticise Marvel for their disappointments lately while still being fans, there is nothing wrong with admitting something has flaws
They really arnt that’s y majority of people still heavily enjoyed the film literally put in is marvels top five
Nvm there are alot more i just completely tried to forget them😭
nostalgia effect left a good mark 👍
LOL
she hulk was truly a disaster honestly
TOP 5!?
Hell no
It amazes me that people like that show
yeah same 😭 it physically hurt to watch the first episode
Lol the thing about she hulk is that it’s bad but I still wanna watch it
what boards
Hurt to watch every episode
Lol this is overdoing it because everybody was happy to see Wong and daredevil let’s be honest
Oh yeah i love daredevil
sameeee
it isn't overdoing it, you're just blind to criticism at this point
The daredevil show was absolutely amazing and so are his comics
by the way, not top five
YES!! i am so scared they will ruin him in the new show
Oh im so worried
I’m too big of a marvel fan to be bothered so yeah I guess
I heard itll be gritty like the netflix one so thats a good sign
so discussing you whether a Marvel production is good or not is pointless because you will always answer yes
regardless of its actual quality
I said marvels top five
Thats honestly sad
that's why i asked what boards, you didn't answer
yeah it is
No I’ll agree when something is bad but I’m also gonna agree when it had its good moments
Also I didn’t say I love she hulk
You should be able to enjoy something while still seeing its flaws tho
you just said "I’m too big of a marvel fan to be bothered so yeah I guess" when I said you're blind to criticism
you quite literally agreed with me
I also said I’ll agree when something is bad but I’ll also agree when it has good moments guess u left that out
i didn't leave that out, i recalled what you had said just a moment ago
i find it hard to believe what you're saying when you just said Nexus' opinion of She Hulk is overdoing it while not even watching the show yet lol and you even said you heard it's bad
Exactly 💀
I didn’t say that tf? I did watch the show now ur just switching up my wording but carry on
What is happening
no you said "i still wanna watch it" which implies you haven't watched it yet
guess i misunderstood lol
English isn't my first language so i understand it best when it's proper grammar
It’s clear u got the wrong implication I agreed that it’s bad but that’s also the reason why I continued to watch it
Or ur just slow
you continued to watch it because it's bad?
so you're resorting to insults now? nice
Because how would I hve know Wong and daredevil were in it?
it was... hyped everywhere? lol
even my friends who didn't watch it knew
Now ur getting defensive lmaooo😭😭😭
I only watched it once i heard matt was in it 😭
how...? 😭
how was that in any way defensive
LMAOOO
Anywayz
LMAO
oopssss
This got incredibly off topic incredibly fast
it always does honestly lol
Nice
I’ll be honest I don’t really think it’s either
What do you think it is?
What is it
Just neither, really
It’s not an avengers movie because it doesn’t have avengers in the title (I suppose you could say it is though because it focuses on the avengers) but I wouldn’t say it’s a captain America movie either because it doesn’t just focus on captain America
Both Tony and Steve are the main characters
Technically the only main character is Captain America, Iron Man just has an important role as the “antagonist” for the “protagonist”…
it’s like an avengers spinoff to me. a captain america based spinoff following his POV after the avengers all fall out with each other
that’s why i’d say it’s a captain america film
also because it is literally the title
The antagonist can be a main character in a film
They're just not the protagonist
captain america had the best trilogy (in my opinion)
I think it should've been a series instead to give more insight upon certain issues in MCU that were briefly mentioned in movie
The “main” character is the protagonist, the main character can never be a secondary character within the protagonist show/ movie, I’m not denying the fact that the antagonist can be almost as important, but it’s still not the main character level of importance
W take, better than Thor’s trilogy for sure 💀
You seem to forget that both the protagonist and antagonist can be main characters
The protagonist may be the primary main character or so
Not really, I’m using the definition of the word and I’m referring to the importance within the movie as well
But an antagonist can be a main character
no cause fr
what was his hair and no eyebrows in the first one
I'm using the definitions as well
Both were important
There can only be 1 main, the definition wouldn’t make any sense if there’s multiple mains, otherwise you could say there’s 5 main characters all as important as the protagonist
I'm just saying there can be two main characters
???
Not the definition of main…
Guess you've never heard of dual protagonism
How many main characters do you think there is in movies/ shows? Do you believe there’s no limit to main characters?
Except for the fact that Captain America wasn’t that
U just that that there can be only 1 main character
Secondly that’s not accurate, what’s an example of dual protagonism?
I simply brought to your attention that dual protagonism exists
I wasn't referring to Captain America at the moment
Yes, it wouldn’t make sense otherwise
Example?
Buddy films
Movie references? Show references?
Altho I didn't watch it, I want to assume Ted was one
Example?
Ted was the protagonist, especially since his name is on the title
Am I right or wrong @tulip glade @celest blaze
“Ted and friends” isn’t dual protagonistic
What about Butch and Sundance
Never heard of it, I’ll look it up, but can you send the definition of dual protagonism?
Yh np
I was referring to a credible source
What would you consider a credible source
I understand this concept, but not the one you’re referring to as examples, I’ve seen movies where there are 2 main characters with 2 different scenes and both are the main characters, but that’s nothing like what we see in the Civil War movie
Google Oxford or a source from a reputable website that everyone/ most people knows of or uses
Ok
Or even Webster works
I don’t need the definition anymore, I understand your point, I was just confused at first
Oh okay
I literally thought it was called Avengers Civil War for a long time, till someone harshly corrected me 😭 lmao
But just to clarify, you’re saying that Captain America is dual protagonists similarly to a buddy film?
Yes you are
Yes dual protagonists exist
The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo
The Prestige
Lost In Translation
Thelma and Louise
No I just mentioned the buddy film as an example of dual protagonism. I believe captain america has 2 main characters, similar to dual protagonist films.
cool thanks 👍
Fair enough, I guess we just shared a different perspective of how we see the movie
yeah i guess so
lizard knew right? I remember peter set up the camera in the sewers for his fight with lizard but the dumbass left "Property of Peter Parker" on it so when Lizard found the camera he figured out that Peter = Spiderman.
Or do you mean that the Lizard knows who he is but not Curt Connors?
the lizard IS curt connors...
either way, still leaves us electro lol
gotg's trilogy surpasses tbh
i cannot disagree
🇼
Guardians demolishes
If we just counting MCU trilogies guardians is by far the best MCU trilogy
It’s the only MCU trilogy where all 3 films are equally good
facts fr
^^^^
It's the only MCU trilogy with good films xd
About dual protagonism being a thing?
Yeah
And yes CW is an example of it
@wild oasis if you want a better example of a film featuring dual protagonism which is more similar to this film I recommend watching the prestige if you haven't yet
The Prestige is cool
One of Nolan’s weirder films
Def the better Christian bale performance in a Nolan movie
naaah. i lovbed the movie for whatever reason. just pointing out/answering the question that it was just an avengers movie rather than its title to be about Cap.
It was definitely an Avengers movie but they wanted to have the Captain America trilogy in name alone
Christian bale has no good performances
but American Psycho :(
American Psycho is overrated
but he's literally me :(
:(
I mean technically its a Captain America story since he and his beliefs are the main focus, but the overall feel is more like an Avengers film.
I’ll look into it 💪
it's still a great performance
Ah yes. The prestige
Good example
Lmaoo
lol
i reckon its Cap 3 and Avengers 2.5
he was great in american psycho and the prestige
Well if civil war is an event film than a cap film, then the same could be said about DS2MoM and NWH being an "event film" then a doctor strange film or spidey film
no way home at least has a compelling arc for tom
civil war does for cap as well but it feels like an avengers movie
i feel no way home still feels like a movie about tom's spiderman
I don't, cause there was too much emphasis on the previous Spider-Man and the villains, I bet you if you take Tobey, Andrew, Charlie cox and the previous villains, it would never had made that much and be Highly regarded anyways. Those other characters and actors only made Tom "better", not the other way around.
Same with civil war, take away alot of the characters that was in it and I don't think it would have done as well as it did
So it is less of a "cap film" as much as NWH is less of a "Tom Holland spidey film"
no doubt the older characters made the movie as popular as it was, the movie ultimately still has a good narrative arc for tom
the movie is still completely centered around tom's spiderman
the other spider characters benefit his arc and def feel like side characters
cap civil war if anything is a tony and cap film
since both tony and cap basically get the same amount of shit in the movie
the other spidermen in no way home def feel like side characters who just benefit tom's main arc while they both have their smaller arcs
and the villains especially norman clearly benefit tom's spiderman
its still very much centered specifically on tom's journey
Not really, cause many people consider it the closing of a Spider-Man 4 for tobey AND TASM3 for Andrew and all 3 got a pretty good decent amount of screen time, alongside doctor strange, I just don't see NWH as a Tom's film as much as I don't see civil war as a cap film
yeah but tom's arc is ultimately the focus of the film
and the film makes it very clear
To me it doesn't
civil war is very much about both tony and cap on the same amount of level
as opposed to the spidermen still feeling like side characters in nwh
obviously andrew gets his gwen arc concluded and peter gets a chance to do better by his villains but those still don't feel as important as tom's arc
NWH and Civil War is essentially a fancast event film
either way both films are far from the best in the cbm genre
Tom didn't even get his own villain for NWH, but the other 2 did
Ehhh, it is just a fandom culmination that's all
norman's goblin was clearly his villain
hell he did way worse shit to him than he ever did to tobey lol
Nah, that is still originally tobeys villain used for tom, in civil war however, cap HAS his personal villain, Zemo
If anything, scorpion should have been Tom's villian
it is tobey's original villain but he proves to be an even better antagonist for tom
so it works out
to be fair it's hard to fumble when you have willem dafoe's goblin tho
best decision they made was to get rid of that stupid mask
willem dafoe's facial expressions are so good
I disagree, tom should have his own villian, not riding on the tail coats of Tobey's villian, at least in civil war, cap still had a villian made for him, but just didn't fight him and Zemo used Tony as his personal henchmen to fight cap for zemos own gain, GG from tobey is just someone we already knew was evil from a different universe
yeah but norman proves to be an even better villain for tom and pushes him to a limit we have never seen tom go to before
tom will get his own amazing villain next trilogy anyways
scorpion will be one but i doubt that will be his best (i love michael mando tho)
my guess is kingpin and scorpion will be villains for the first one, not sure who will be villain for 5 and 6 will def have ned finally become the hobgoblin
Ehh he wasn't an original villian tho, again we already know who GG is and what is he capable of from Tobey's universe, you don't see Civil War borrowing another character from another movie to use as a plot device to be the main character' villian? So, I don't see much of a connection and put both NWH and Civil War as "Event films" not as a "cap or Tom spidey" film, respectively.
they are both event films but i feel nwh focuses more on tom's arc than civil war does on cap
civil war obviously focuses on cap but also gives the same amount of focus to tony
they are very much both equally important to the film
I don't, they both equally focus outside of their MC's story in my POV
fair enough
both movies are event films
i would say no way home is the strongest tom holland spiderman film but im not sure if civil war is better than winter soldier
Both are decent films tho, but not like "Best CBM of all time" tho
obviously
the highest the mcu will ever get is the guardians films and they are 9s at best
That depends on the person, I have seen and heard some say that Civil War is a better cap film than winter soldier and heard others say otherwise and vice versa, kinda the same with Tom, but problem is, most people would agree and say the cap franchise is better than the Tom spidey cause not many people talk highly about homecoming or FFH much than they do with WS, or TFA
far from home is a 6/10 id say
homecoming is a 7
nwh is a higher 7 than homecoming
That is probably the only franchise to have it, cause at this point, none of the other marvel projects franchises have a good streak outside of GOTG, Cap is very close but with F&WS and the upcoming Cap 4, that is definitely going to change real quick
both the cap and tom trilogies share the fact that they both have a movie significantly weaker than the other two movies (cap 1 and ffh respectively)
first cap movie isn't bad but it's clearly weaker than the other two
That's true, but depending on who you talk to cause many folks still shit on phase 1 content, while over inflating phase 3
yeah cap 1 isn't bad it just doesn't have the punch the other two do
the guardians trilogy just stands out from the rest of the mcu due to how unique the style is
they feel like james gunn movies
and not just another studio made marvel film
Exactly, that's why it is held up in high esteem in the Fandom, but funny enough, none of the GOTG films made a bill in Box office, but NWH and Civil War did
And both had alot of cameos and characters involved
well yeah money doesn't exactly translate to quality most of the time
nowadays it is though
cbms that are ass are finally failing at the box office
spiderverse and guardians 3 both did well though due to actually being good films
meanwhile the flash flopped hard and blue beetle is looking to be that way as well
most likely the marvels too
people finally want good shit again
Don't forget the issues with the D+ shows as well
yup
disney + killed the mcu imo
it became quantity over quality
people now know that you don't have to watch every mcu project because most of them are going to be bad lol
That's cause when CW came out and phase 3 was highly anticipated, fans wanted the marvel 12 TV shows to connect with the film universe in some way
yeah the infinity saga actually had buildup to it
this new saga just feels like it's going everywhere and nowhere at the same time
not to mention the characters just arent as good
there's no tony's or steve's
most of the characters people really cared about have either died or retired or in the case of thor been completely ruined
That's cause alot of the characters being shown, especially on D+ aren't really "leading characters" I don't recall anyone asking for a she hulk solo series, F&WS, etc. And most even said secret invasion might have worked better as a film event like CW and NWH, than a dumbed down D+ TV miniseries
yeah good point
also the shows and movies these new characters are in are usually dogshit so that doesn't help
Probably there is only like 1 character/film/show, since the multiverse saga began, that I enjoyed debuting in marvel(including Sony stuff too)
yeah the only characters i like from marvel (including non mcu stuff) nowadays are the spiderverse ones
Also, we got to remember is that it was during dark times with the pandemic and it was right after Endgame so the expections was defined warped imo
true but there has been a clear decline in quality
shit like thor love and thunder and antman 3 is why people have been turning away from the mcu nowadays
actual shitstorms of movies
not to mention shows like she hulk and secret invasion
It's cause marvel studios and even sony, are doing too much, they should have just let another department handle the shows and animations and just let them do what they do best so there is some sort of "focus" or "focal point" cause having to work on like 4+ films plus like 4+ shows in 1 year is a bit excessive
yeah it's quantity over quality
the old model would have been way better but now people have severe fatigue for all these mid ass shows and movies
they will have to try hard to get people to care again
That's the challenge both Sony and Disney have to go thru to earn the fan base back
Especially comic book fans
yeah
the only shit people are excited for is actually good shit
like spiderverse, the batman 2 and hopefully deadpool 3
Like if you look at civil war in mcu, it definitely is dumbed down compared to the comic counter part
true
a lot of mcu ideas are half baked
i do like what they did with thanos though
That's cause they didn't make him simp for death like the did in the comics and want him to be more threatening than DC's Darkseid
yeah
I feel that Deadpool 3 is going to be a huge cash grab and not really "in-tune" with the other 2 Deadpool films cause although it is still R rated and trying to keep the "spirit" of the character intact, it is still under Disney and you can't really trust Disney or Sony to really do certain characters justice.
I mean, it might do well just with branding alone, but it is really uncertain until the film comes out
i have slight hope it will be a satire on multiverse films
Maybe it will be as good as CW and NWH, but who knows, cause it could very well be an "event film" just like alot of "3rd film trilogies" has, so far
it would seem in tune with the deadpool movies for them to make fun of multiverse movies
i think that may be what they will do so im nervously excited
as long as it makes fun of multiverse movies i feel itll be good
We just have to wait and see and check if the humor is decent or just dry as hell again cause Marvel hasn't been good with the humor lately, just look at L&T and Quantumania as examples
its the same team that made the og deadpool movies though
i doubt the humor will be different
hopefully they will cook
but you never know these days
True, but don't forget, just cause you have the same team, doesn't mean there won't be any "studio interference" aka Disney
Or the studio putting parameters, filters, limiters, cause remember, Deadpool 3 is suppose to be part of the mcu
So they will try to implement and make Deadpool fit in the mcu under Disney terms, not based in the franchise itself, which was under Fox at the time
And just like civil war or NWH or even MoM, there is a possibility that Deadpool 3 won't even be about wade Wilson and more about the cameos or spectacles around it
Yes
did u see that guy on youtube prewriting the college trilogy
its good but it adapts a lot from spectacular
i watched it like 2 months ago but its a rlly cool plot with scorpion and kingpin and tombstone
also i got bit by a mosquito i blame you lol
my bad lol
i remember watching one of his vids a while ago
Mosquito-Man 