#Saintboys booster with a new name

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

slender charm
#

This guy is a prolific proven booster, yet he changes his name, carries on boosting, and now that's 4 designs of mine alone he has prevented from getting an award. Countless other people are not getting a place on the list because of this booster. He has been warned, banned, more than twice! When are we going to see tougher punishments for boosters? Please! I don't want to leave this app like so many others have in the past. I'm this close.

#

@winter pier

timid lake
winter pier
#

Those are just screenshots from the design page

slender charm
# winter pier Where can I find the proof that they're boosting?

When he was found guilty of it the other times, he amassed a bunch of people he boosted with. Those people are still liking his designs now. It's residual likes he's getting. This is why you won't see proof now, only from before, and also why he needs to be stopped from designing for a week or two so people will stop looking for his designs

#

There is someone in my discord server that told me about his friend, supermommy, and how they traded likes with each other. This guy in my server was the biggest booster in rlg history. He turned his back on boosting and went legit with us. Now he's ratting out his boosting allies

winter pier
#

I'm not banning people because somebody on another discord server said somebody is boosting…

slender charm
#

Mate, you have to look at the big picture. He's been caught multiple times, and now he's gaining awards instantly, getting more likes than all of us lol. You can't honestly think he's getting likes because his designs are good. We are in this everyday, watching these people. You guys still don't know how big this issue is. Clearly. If you want to prevent this, you need to ban people when proof is first given, or at least the second time they're proven to be boosting. That way they won't be able to ride the wave of boosted likes AFTER being warned, or banned for 2 days. Its not long enough.