#Quarkus Backend Solution

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

finite galeBOT
#

@dapper sage has a question:

aa55h

can be quarkus used as a complete backend solution?

#

<@&987246399047479336> please have a look, thanks.

#

Here is an AI assisted attempt to answer your question 🤖. Maybe it helps! In any case, a human is on the way 👍. To continue talking to the AI, you can use </chatgpt:1108714622413963314>.

#
TJ-Bot
Can be quarkus used as a complete backend solution?

Yes, Quarkus can be used as a complete backend solution for Java applications. Quarkus is a Kubernetes-native Java framework specifically designed for cloud-native and serverless applications. It provides a fast startup time and low memory usage, making it ideal for microservices architectures.

Quarkus includes a wide range of features that are essential for building robust backend applications, such as support for RESTful APIs, messaging systems, database access, security mechanisms, and more. It also offers seamless integration with popular Java libraries and frameworks like Hibernate ORM, Spring DI, and Eclipse MicroProfile.

Additionally, Quarkus supports reactive programming and has built-in support for popular reactive streams implementations like Mutiny. This allows developers to easily build scalable and responsive backend services that can handle a high volume of concurrent requests.

Overall, Quarkus provides all the necessary tools and capabilities to develop a complete backend solution for Java applications. Its lightweight nature and optimized performance make it an excellent choice for building modern cloud-native applications that require high efficiency and scalability.

onyx vine
#

It can.

#

And please start using #1051826284008853505 rather than posting in chit-chat.

dapper sage
#

are you aware of any issues it comes with when using it instead of something like spring?

onyx vine
#

It's a bit less used, but no less valid.

dapper sage
#

great to hear that

#

it seems its easily deployable as well

dapper sage
#

wow quarkus seems to be compatible with spring data jpa!

tiny wadi
#

quarkus is amazing

#

its based on vert.x so its super performant too

#

and has great out of the box support for native builds

dapper sage
tiny wadi
#

Yeah I looked into it but I'm a serverless kid so it didn't fit the boat for me because I needed something fast

#

While native builds are good, it didn't seem worth it compared to python, typescript, rust etc since they have really quick start times

#

I'm also a Spring hater

#

A big big hater

glossy salmon
#

lmao

tiny wadi
#

I have a GH issue open on their repo and it's been unloved by the Spring team for over a year

glossy salmon
#

share

dapper sage
glossy salmon
#

it got completely ignored lmao

tiny wadi
#

That contributed to my hatred peepo_cry

#

Because it's an actual issue but it's just not "common"?

#

Like what's wrong with using their discovery service for discovery of a web socket peepo_cry

tiny wadi
#

It effected my development though because I had to find workarounds and loop holes

#

To your immediate question though, yeah Quarkus is good

#

Since you have access to the entire vert.x stack, you can easily use that in place for any natively missing functionality

dapper sage
#

but i need help choosing a better framework

#

Taz also told me that AWS can do it serverless, but idk if it can fulfill my needs + never woprked with it

onyx vine
#

If you're using Quarkus, why not use Panache?

dapper sage
#

if you know anyone who knows quarkus let me know

finite galeBOT
#

Please don't ask to ask, nor only say hello, just ask your actual question right away, thanks cat_thumbs_up

If you want to read about the details of why this is better, check out:
https://dontasktoask.com/

Don't ask to ask, just ask

dapper sage
#

i wanted to try implement JWT auth using quarkus, generated the jwt token, but when i then passed it onto Authorization header and secured endpoint i always get unauthorized

onyx vine
#

For people to help you you'll need to share some code.