#Public Thoughts?
1 messages ยท Page 1 of 1 (latest)
@cosmic phoenix Can you explain specifically what you mean by "governance system"
Like in terms of Voting, appointing representatives, government.
I'm working on a concept project based on Community creation (Colonization) from Web3 into the Real world.
Right now I'm building a landing page for "Settler Signups"
Settling where
Into the Web3 environment.
Utilizing Cryptocurrency and NFT's, dApps, and eventually a blockchain as its birth core. As time goes on and the project becomes more popular and establishes a global stage. We transition into the real world with whatever idea we collaborate together.
Just because you don't understand the concept I'm trying to pitch. Doesn't give you a right to throw shade.
i do understand the concept
you are thinking of making a distributed organization
where proprotional voting shares are distributed based on ownership of a token
and you want to, abstractly, collaborate with that "community"
a DAO, effectively
its just an extremely played out, fundamentally flawed idea
because it ignores all the aspects of actually running an organization that are inconvenient
and you are thinking of using ChatGPT to summarize documents or whatever
The mature and nuanced take is that you are just fucked from the word go if you want crypto, web3, or nfts to be involved in any capacity
both on a technical level (they are all bad mechanisms for governance)
and on a social level (nfts and crypto are dead dude)
which, adding on that you don't seem to understand why "colonization" and "settler" are extremely fucked up things, doesn't exactly position you as a great person to build such a system
See. Throwing shade without even knowing. You automatically assuming the path in trying to take.
you are just fucked from the word go if you want crypto, web3, or nfts to be involved in any capacity
There is no extra context than can justify this
Well to be fair you're responding as fast as a chatbot giving me no time to personally type on a cell phone device my response and rebuttal
All these "concept" titles and governance ideas are as said: CONCEPT with collaboration the path can and usually does change/evolve... As all GOOD Community's do.
But my core concept can't differ. Governance is mandatory just like in the real world. Without it stealing, hiding, hording, killing, invading... All happens. Granted even with "Governance" mankind still does all those things, but at a cost/penalty (ones which I honestly feel are too lenient)
And a good governance mechanism (protocol) is to have multi-levels of fail-safes; Checks and Balances.
What better way to do that than have its own community govern themselves in a democratic format with voting (Minus the Electoral College idea).
I envisioned a 5 Layer (Level) system: Where proposal on adding, subtracting, and restricting things depends on the votes (For and Against).
I have a diagram concept without crucial details on the voting system path.
This concept can be used for implementing Cryptocurrency & NFTs for Web3 integration.
Or
Can start with straight backed and pooled Fiat too $USD.
No matter what an asset needs to be used as governance leverage and a form of payment. Because nothing's free and never will be.
And to be frank, anyone who says NFT and Cryptocurrency is dead obviously are "FUD" sheep.
You got burned or missed out on a Lucrative opportunity before it became popular due to your insecurities and hesitations... But now it's too late and you can't make money off it really so most end up saying exactly what you said
Generally, in democratic systems, voting is free. Thats the point.
Your concept here is voting shares - same as any publically owned company - just worse
it is a structure that provably consolidates wealth over time
This phrasing gives it away
you have no interest in making anything actually good for the world
just in getting money or getting enough power that you get to be the boot of capitalism this time
governance systems, real ones, need to account for situations like "person with x voting shares died"
or have safeguards in place for malfesience
but virtue of giving proportional power via money you've just made a system where "rich people win" which
dude.
the reason you are going to have trouble getting good feedback is because this entire system, structure, and concept have played out
multiple times before
and competent people know that
You got burned or missed out on a Lucrative opportunity before it became popular due to your insecurities and hesitations... But now it's too late and you can't make money off it really so most end up saying exactly what you said
I understand why this is comforting to believe, but it is simply not true
If someone pitches you on a "great" Web3 project, ask them if it requires buying or selling crypto to do what they say it does.
Sources and Further Reading
https://web3isgoinggreat.com/
https://tante.cc/2021/12/17/the-third-web/
https://davidgerard.co.uk/blockchain/2021/03/11/nfts-crypto-grifters-try-to-scam-artists-again/
https://amycastor.com...
^evergreen
You keep having it fly over your head...
The system I'm working on ensures all those things.
Hence the 5 levels of Governance.
Level one is citizens/natives
Level 2-4 have yet to be given title and purpose, but still fulfill the need of ratifying and voting (similar to the Governance of American Democracy)
And level 5 is the top people (President, vice , founder, and Co-founder)
Presidents and vice are voted on and appointed in the beginning. Just like most country's they will have a "term" limit. All levels 2-5 (minus Founder and Co-founder) will
Founder and Co-founder are permanent titles. When they pass away (die) their titles change to CEO & Co-CEO which are there after inheritance titles only given to the ones voted on.
It throws a hint of Patriarchal beginnings and gradually fades into a Governing body.
All voted in on.
The number of "seats" from levels 2 - 4 is undefined because that would depend on the total population and would have to alter as the population grows.
The ones who are "Settlers" are appointed temporary positions in the levels of Governance.
Once the seats are all filled, all those who initially signed up as Settlers obtain the title Native.
New people can join in as migrants for free and pay a fee along with some security docs for KYC purposes and legal purposes to obtain their "Citizenship".
From there they can stay that way and just engage, or if they have actual knowledge in society, programming, design, or anything thats useful they can submit a proposal for a higher governance level (if ones available).
The level of Governance one obtains is going to be proportionate to what they can contribute and how much knowledge they have.
The verification, Badges of Governance Levels, Fee payments, all contribute to the Community and the Cause
As per every country on this planet. Citizenship isn't free, not even for natives.
Trade, services, entertainment, basic living needs, all come at a price... It's how Humanity governs itself in the real world.
And should be no different anywhere else.
However, most if not all country's on this planet have poor management of its societal economy and inner workings of its own governance.
Because they are all power hungry or far Left or Right Extremist
It's how Humanity governs itself in the real world.
No, you vote because you are given the right to vote in a democracy
your system inherently eschews the concept of a "right"
As per every country on this planet. Citizenship isn't free, not even for natives.
Citizenship is free for natives, what are you even talking about
the reason you can't separate the financial aspect of this from the social aspect isn't because intrinsically society is "pay to play", its because without it there is no point for you
And voting doesn't have shares... Everybody is a 1:1 ratio. Minus the natives. Their power is always equal to Citizens. And when all the natives pass. It's just citizens doing it all with the other Lvls .
Basically designed to pass down the torch sorta speak
and also the metaphor of natives/settlers/colonizers...man
pick a less "millions dead, millions dying" analogy
Why... Why think small
shit reminds of how New Hampshire went full libertarian
and just sorta is learning how governments work live on TV
And btw I am a NH resident
Earning the Dox in your name
and that makes sense
fuck man, take a civics class
anything
form a union!
that would be fun
you get to learn how real shit has to work
Why would I wish to learn about a flawed system of government and society.
Id much rather recreate the wheel and do it better
and you'll figure out real quick that a shitty, inefficient mechanism for straw polls
that just doesn't solve anything
Because the phrase isn't "Forget about all history that way you never know about their mistakes"
The system I'm working isn't "designed" to [Solve anything] it designed to replace
its "Those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it."
but the systems you want to replace do solve problems
they cause others, but they do solve problems that are real
No it implements ways to solve problems in a democratic format
The vote won't use crypro
then why does any of it
It's a currency just like another. Fees and payments don't "have" to be in crypto... But it is an innovative way to control the economy by giving those who put in the power to determine it's worth.
no, youve invented union dues
which serve a "continuous funding" purpose
But it is an innovative way to control the economy by giving those who put in the power to determine it's worth.
It is innovative in exactly zero ways
make an organization that solves an actual goal better than an existing system
Union dues, state tax, federal tax, income tax, IRS tax, gratuity cash tax... Bro your fighting with me about funding. Had none of these "existed" how would anything get done ... On the word of my good name? Please honor is dead
don't make a system that has an undefined 2-4 tiers of people having never looked up anything about the history of governance structures and just assume it will be better than everything and you'll take over the world
Taxes and dues do serve a purpose
but the way you've described them is purposeless
pure profit
taxes go to roads, union dues go to salaries and war chests
We transition into the real world with whatever idea we collaborate together.
you have no goal
just "get people in a room, and they've all given me money.. step 2: ???, step3: Profit"
Damn straight. It's the way of the Underpants Gnomes
you can form a non-profit or other organizational structure without doing any of this bullshit
and that could actually be useful, especially if you are in a field without a union
Thats not a coherent fucking sentence
I did, I just didn't base my entire belief system on it
oh i get it
nvm this ones on me
still incoherent tho
Oh jeez ๐ was a joke man.
Let's put it all like this.
I'm looking for insight and ideas to incorporate into my governance concept.
Can stem from coding, finances, program design, website design, algorithm and Mechanism structuring and coding... Anything dude.
If I have to essentially explain my entire thought process and how it all should work then why would I care about asking for assistance and help or even a community?
I would just launch my idea and shadow govern
all good here?
Couldn't tell ya.
We got a Citizen Caine in the mix here ๐
I haven't seen that movie so idk if thats apt
Not movie. Yes the name I'm referencing is a movie... But no I'm referring to you as a descendant of Caine's lineage