#Should I install Java 8 instead of the newest version of Java just because of Java FX?

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

tepid depotBOT
#

<@&987246399047479336> please have a look, thanks.

tepid depotBOT
#

While you are waiting for getting help, here are some tips to improve your experience:

Code is much easier to read if posted with syntax highlighting and proper formatting.

If nobody is calling back, that usually means that your question was not well asked and hence nobody feels confident enough answering. Try to use your time to elaborate, provide details, context, more code, examples and maybe some screenshots. With enough info, someone knows the answer for sure.

Don't forget to close your thread using the command </help-thread close:1027500463647621170> when your question has been answered, thanks.

mighty frost
#

so first, you won't find javafx on java 8

gray tapir
mighty frost
#

and second, you can easily use javafx assuming you know what you are doing

mighty frost
gray tapir
mighty frost
#

so either you install javafx with maven like people usually do, but that require to know maven... and if your teacher doesn't know, an alternative could be to use azul jdk which should come bundled with javafx by default in any version

mighty ruin
#

They just say that because they dont know anything about the newer versions and are lazy to learn them to be able to check your work

#

Thats just how it is, for example my prof/teacher not know anything about records and seeled classes when i asked him

#

Not even the new method to return a switch statement

tepid depotBOT
#

Closed the thread due to inactivity.

If your question was not resolved yet, feel free to just post a message to reopen it, or create a new thread. But try to improve the quality of your question to make it easier to help you 👍