#đ„ Joker: Folie Ă Deux
1 messages · Page 3 of 1
Like who would ever give Phillips money again? or Coppola after they put out such shit.
Movies won't be mainstream anymore.
Nobody wad giving Coppola any money before anyway
They'll be niche.
And they'll make no impact if creatives took over.
Coppola tried to make his own films without the studios and they made no impact.
He did an insane thing and made his own thing in his own terms and now people mad about it
Why is thay a bad thing?
Because nobody will care enough.
What good is art if it makes no impact?
Meh, people will care
If it just becomes a forgotten thing.
Nobody cares anymore. Attendance has gone down.
So something like Ant Man or Shang Chi or whatever hasnt become a forgotten film cause it made money? Got it
Original Blade Runner made no money, yet people talk about it 40 years later
That's not my point. My point is that creatives are not totally angelic.
Phillips for instance.
What a pathetic director. So much hubris and ego.
There will always be an audience and an appetite for this kind of film
Maybe the issue is the wide release
Then make them for less, don't make them for 200 million.
Take risks, but don't spend a lot.
If they go back to making 15 mill films that go the festival and then arthouse route they'll probably find more success
"Get Out" costed only a couple million.
I'd go lower.
I mean you speak as if Phillips was the one that approved the budget lol
Take it to the studio
He had 100% full creative control. That was part of his deal to return.
He wanted no test screenings and he said no to budget decisions to reduce the cost (I.E deciding not to film in London to take advantage of their tax credit).
But yeah, the studio is to blame for trusting Phillips so much and for being greedy in making a sequel to something that did not need a sequel.
Well duh, if you have the power to negotiate that you do it
But now nobody's going to want to work with him. Lol. Hope he saves his 20 million salary.
Poor WB not getting tax benefits
"You don't put your own money in the show" - The Producers
Megalopolis flopped hard.
And Phillips can say goodbye to creative control.
But Phillips did have a say.
And everyone is grilling him, deservedly so. He went way overboard.
If you want your arthouse films, make them for less.
We need more films like this that piss everyone off and make the studios bleed money
The resl Joker would love it
So you want movie theaters to die? You're pretentious.
Nobody will care anymore.
You hate people enjoying movies.
Movie theaters arent dying because of films like Joker or Megalopolis
This is a trend much bigger than two directors doing their thing
I like that people can enjoy different things in different ways
And thats what killing movie theaters?
Good. But you can't deny that most people will dislike something more than others.
Didnt know that started last month
Apathy is killing movie theaters.
Sure, and?
If you make decisions to appease the few over the mass, you'll piss off a lot of people.
I.E French Revolution.
More like predatory studio deals, rising ticket prices, a lack of diversity in terms of the movies available
Lmao
Studios aren't going to make the small films if no one watches them.
So why aren't you watching them in the theater?
Oh, that's right, because you don't care.
That's why I like A24 films because people actually go out and watch them and support them.
But of course, when anything niche gets popular, people like you will start saying it's overrated.
You are comparing movie going to a political revolution but i'm the pretentious one apparently lol
I'm saying that if people don't support them, people won't want to invest in them if there's no return.
Lol i watch all sorts of stuff in theaters, you dont know shit
Well, can you find millions more of you out there?
I even watch more smaller stuff than the big stuff
Because my issue is how to mobilize more people like you to go out and support.
When did i say something is overrated for being famous?
You are making a bunch of assumptions because you ran out of arguments
Should I kill myself if I like the big movies?
Well, people dont go to the movies because ticket prices are expensive as fuck
Because you seem to have such distain for people like me who like regular films.
We need either reduced ticket prices for certain days or even movies or types of movies
Or more arthouse theater chains
Lmao what
Agreed. But inflation is insane.
Everything okay bro?
No.
I'm having a rough day.
Nothing matters anymore.
Everything I seem to love is just crumbling.
Nobody cares anymore.
I'm just spiralling now.
Getting angry for god knows what.
I have no issue in people enjoying mainstream stuff, is the people who have disdain for more arthouse stuff and arent open to new experiences cause they want their equivalent of cinematic fast food
I'm sorry for arguing.
Sorry to hear that
Fair. I like the ocassional arthouse stuff. Drive (2011) was amazing.
I guess there's no justice in the world.
I feel sad about it because I used to watch more out there films.
But since nobody cares, I stopped.
Yeah i mean, in a perfect world there'd be just enough mainstream and arthouse movies out there and enough theaters willing to show both
With affordable ticket prices lol
Would you be in favor of low ticket prices for arthouse films and high ticket prices for mainstream blockbusters?
AMC played around with that idea. A low budget arthouse film would be a cheap ticket, but a mainstream blockbuster film would be an expensive ticket.
Yeah, mainly cause i'd be buying the lower priced tickets more often lol
But in all seriousness, thats how it works where i live
Theres the big theater chains that show the mainstream blockbusters and those are expensive, then there's the smaller arthouse theaters that cost almost half the price
i don't think arthur had a visitor. my theory is the guard had a deal with the dude who shanks him and was leading him out as bait.
actually kinda think the bomb was not intentionally set to free arthur from the trial but maybe just a stunt. that it actually freed him is more of a "happy accident" than anything. i think that makes sense with the theme of ppl caring more about the chaos joker brings than arthur as the person.
yeah i agree with that
honestly im siding with wb on this one, bros gave todd 200 million dollers and bent over backwards and this is what he gave em
i assumed that bruce was the visitor
like he finally comes to visit arthur after his trial to get some semblence of closure if not from the actual guy that killed his parents
and thats taken away from him
Yeah if that was the directors idea from the beginning it most certainly couldâve came in full circle especially if it was at least hinted in the first film, but in my opinion it was kind of forced and didnât leave the impact it shouldâve had with such a tragic and revealing scene
Someone like Phillips never deserved full creative control.
Yes girl so agreed
Get the straight white men out of Hollywood
eh nah that's just dramatic. i'd rather see someone's full creative vision on a movie, good or bad, than have a bunch of out-of-touch executives or outside ppl change it
Dead right, no more of those out of touch straight white male executives
ok i get it you hate men lmao
Sounds a lil extreme almost a little like reactionary discrimination đ ⊠donât get me wrong things should be more balanced for sure
But the solution isnât to just exclude a group of people that one dislikes
I just think people like Todd Phillips shouldnât get full creative control idk
Iâm naive to industry but Iâd think itâs reasonable that most directors shouldnât have full creative control unless they have a proven track record
not just one or two major films that do good
Tbf he did, as far as straight white men go anyway
Joker was a monstrously big hit relative to its budget, one of the most lucrative Warner Bros sweeps in an age
And thatâs coming after his Hangover movies
Heâs a guy who can bring in money
Until now
Woopsie
Can Cathy Yan be let out of director jail now
How was the budget for this the size of a marvel movie is what I want to know, there were only like two or three locations in this movie aside from the musical dream sequences
the scope for this didn't feel much bigger than the first
I mean phoenix took like 20 mil
Then theres the fact they had to get a set for the court room and then arthur running around
Also getting all of arkham rented out
Courtroom sets cost about $20
Theyâre all over Hollywood
Bby Arkham isnât a real place
Ik but they had to rent out atleast something for it
Since philips apparently insisted they shoot at more expensive locations
The explosion scene cost $100 million, I got it
Dude really wanted to burn as much money from the studio as he could get away with lmao
Cant believe todd philips blew up 93 court rooms just to get the perfect shot
What an artiste
I fuckin hate philips after this
Man fr got given ungodly control w a marvel blockbuster budget and just said fuck it lemme cook
I wonder if there will be a more expensive drama than this
We stan
Like philips might have just sabotaged the whole dcu w this
Not at all
The Gunn DCU isnât linked to this at all
Thatâs very publicly accepted
No i mean in terms of studio being involved
Like what if the execs start tweaking stuff in gunns plan cuz of paranoia from this
Incels hate it because it completely goes against what they misinterpreted from the first movie, politically correct people hate it because itâs a joker movie, and comic book lovers hate it cause itâs not a joker movie
I didnât like it but I donât hate it
Hate is a strong word for a film that doesnât please pseudo intelligent film bros
Same
I think itâs fine, it has some really good ideas but it doesnât really develop them or do anything that interesting with them
Based
What if youâre just a movie fan, and you didnât like it because it wasnât a good movie?
Points to this one over the first one for not pointlessly and forcefully adding fanservice stuff like Bruce Wayne into it
I haven't seen the first one in years but that stuff was so cringe
So the Harvey Dent inclusion doesnât count? Or that one wasnât as forceful because the movie happened to be half of a courtroom drama?
You could give him any other name and nothing would change ig
(I do not condone this meme)
WHAT THE FUCK
The movie had some things going for it, Gaga almost nearly saved it
But in the end
Nothing really fucking happens
It was fun! They sang, they laughed, they acted real good!
Tbf one big thing happens if you noticed
Right at the end
And Joker died for nothing
There ya go
He died for ||repenting his sins||
He showed humanity, and was killed for it
You can like it or not, but thereâs an intent to the story
IMMA JUST KILL HIM OFF FROM A NOBODY BC DARK MOVIE IS DARK
Dude
Well no
It wasnât that haha
He was gonna die anyways
Ye
And?
I mean
Idk what âhumanityâ youâre talking about
He still laughs like a maniac
Dude is just sick in the head
He chose to accept what heâd done instead of trying to blame it on some supervillain alter ego
The movieâs point is heâs split in two
He confessed, instead of torturing his survivors
They do that at the end
No, the movieâs plot is that heâs claiming to be split in two as an excuse for his crimes.
Arthur AND Joker still exist
Then he sees that by using this excuse, heâs hurting the few survivors of his crime spree
So he gives up the act
He was never split in two lol
This isnât subtle, they very explicitly say all of this
It only works if you didnât fucking see the first movie
This goes against everything the first stood for
Watch Joker
You really think both movies are as black and white as you think 
No. It goes against how everyone misinterpreted the first film
Here we go again
The characterization is much more different here
The first movie was about a guy getting pushed and manipulated by shitty circumstances until he availed snapped went on a killing spree?
The second movie is him being manipulated into thinking he isnât guilty, that there is some supervillain alter ego inside that did these horrible things for him. The most Arthur has ever been in control of himself is in confessing that he went on a murder spree, not hiding behind the moniker.
The movies go together
You might not like the story, but itâs a coherent whole
It really, really isnât
He was never a criminal mastermind, he was always a sick man on a one night shooting spree
Like any number of shooters across America
This was never the Joker who fights Batman, itâs an alt-universe take
Much more than that, the fact the Joker movement exists
I never said it was
Idc about Batman
The Joker movement exists in the second film too! And they kill him for not being Joker enough!
Lots of cults turn on their inspiration eventually
That wasnât a Joker gang, Iâm sure that was just some lunatic
Pointless, lunatic
The whole point is by recanting Joker, heâs made enemies of the mob he rallied in the first film
It was a Joker guy, he literally says the catchphrase
The same one a Joker guy said when he killed the Waynes in Part 1
You get what you fucking deserve
The movie is flawed, but for Godâs sake pay some attention lol
That doesnât mean he is, everyone in that jail constantly quoted and taunted him. Including GUARDS. Who in case you didnât know, were NOT Joker guys
You pay attention lol
He says the catchphrase, he spends the whole movie studying Arthur from afar and he cuts a smile into his cheeks after killing him
Heâs clearly a Joker fanatic
Thereâs no other reading
I just got off the theater and am on the iPad, once im home in a bit Iâll further analyze the movie
On my phone lol
Just another wannabe who just like Joker and this movieâs script, amounts to nothing. Him killing Joker and Joker finally âdecidingâ he wasnât Joker amounts to nothing. Even if it was real (which it isnât, right after ârepentingâ he laughs the both times the jury says âguiltyâ, maybe youâre the one who needs to pay attention), at that point itâs too late dawg. I study Psychology, diagnosed and specifically psychopathic Psychiatrist patients (which are a higher case than a Psychological one) donât just SUDDENLY go and change like that, and if they do, as psychopathic patients theyâre not supposed to believe and just let them out fast like that scot free
The first film was about a guy who the world failed him getting an ambiguous chance at life. The world did and would do nothing for him (doesnât really justify him full on murdering in non self defense of course) and he gets his sick or not revenge on that. And he also gets his consequences for doing so (jail and eventually, death) They couldâve just left it there if Arthur/Jokerâs story was gonna end the same way anyways. Hence why the idea of a sequel was veeery shaky when the first came out.
Oh girl
my take
lol
I need to log this
2.5 stars
I donât think the movie is shit tho
Just extreeeeemely divisive
I enjoyed the movie
One. Two. Three. Sir I believe that's three words not one
Damn got me there
Pretty much
Itâs got things going for it as it doesnât
Therefore, I cannot call this movie definitively good or bad
I thought some of the dream sequences were inserted weirdly sometimes
Like during the court room
Some of the musical numbers were literally pointless
Or were redundant
How many times do we gotta hear Joker and Harley love each other in a fucking song!?!?!?
Dawgggg even from the opening encounter (which is one of my favorite scenes this year btw) you can tell theyâre mad as fuck for each other
I thought it was weird how my movie started at 6 pm and I came in at around 6:03 and my movie already started
I must've missed like 10 minutes somehow
Probably because I was the only one in the room
When I came in, it was when Arthur was being taught about singing
In the end âthe mentally ill lonerâ got lied to and manipulated by the only person who loved and understood him, ârepentsâ in an effort to get a reduced sentence (which makes no sense because if he really wanted that then his best chance at getting a redemption arc where people would believe him was through pleading insanity with the lawyer WHICH he fired in a dumb psychotic rage) and dies still sad and alone like he was at the end of the first movie
Same
But I was first showing
So
I saw it in this hdr format and the colors on this movie looked so good and striking at times
I swear this movie was fullscreen in the trailers because my showing was in the 2:39:1 aspect ratio
From what I gather from this chat and this server is that you people like arguing about who enjoys movies the right way
nah this channel is mostly abt people arguing if joker 2 does indeed suck or not
Dude no
Thatâs not what reviewing or offering opinions about movies is about
Weâre all just offering our takes and interpretations on it
Nothing new, nothing serious
Also this is one of the best parts and things ever from the movie
Yeah but i look at some of these messages and can't help but wonder if you people know these are just movies right đ
Idk maybe I'm just a casual
i think people get a bit too passionate w the debates ig
Harlequin is better than the movie
So good
When people start disrespecting each otherâs opinions is when that shit starts
Being passionate about what you love is absolutely fine
Just donât get too defensive when other people donât share that
IâM GONNA BUILD A MOUNTAINNNNN
I'm scared to know how expensive each dream sequence must've been because the sets look huge
Thatâs probably why it cost $200m then
To make a movie based on a courtroom
A prison
And fictional dream sequences
That and they overpaid Joaquin
I wish this was more interesting
If this went further it probably wouldâve been better
Agree, awesome album
@thin hawk howâs your mental health bby
I still think it's insane considering how much visual spectacle a marvel movie is able to make for a similar budget
Joker 2, unlike the others you mentioned, followed a movie that made over $1B
Most people were not expecting contrarian dogshit from the movie itself, either.
I think people expected good things from Joker 2 esp after the huge success of the first one and majority were disappointed. Also the problem wasn't that Joker 2 was greenlit, every studio would have done that.. problem was that Todd Phillips was given 100% creative control, with no checks and balances.. he didn't even bother to do test screenings.
Now it's gonna be a huge flop.
i hate that some people are seeing this as a w for the artist cuz philips basically flipped off wb
like man might have single handedly made wb more involved w the artist moving foreward from now on cuz of how hard he fucked up
Thatâs not really how it works
The vast majority of studio filmmakers work with execs and get notes
Phillips only became an exception because Joker 1 was so massive
didnt philips ignore his notes and basically burn through money by insisting they film at expensive locations
ye true nvm
He was never gonna be âthe new normâ anyway, he was an exception
Relative to its budget, Joker surprised everyone by being one of the more successful WB films ever
That gave him negotiation power no one ever gets
still tho idk how man managed to fumble so hard
So this wonât affect 99% of studio/director relationships
Lots and lots of reasons
"it came to me in a dream"
but imagine telling a studio exec that the plot for the sequel to your billion dollar movie came from the main star having a dream abt the mc dancing and singing
o yea also its a musical now
1). Todd Phillips was able to negotiate unprecedented creative freedom, despite not being a hugely talented writer (the script for the first Joker, pre-studio revisions, is very bad).
2). Itâs a musical.
3). Bad word of mouth for a month after Venice.
4). Bad word of mouth over opening weekend from fan screenings.
5). Lady Gaga fans wanted more Lady Gaga.
6). Joker fans wanted more Joker.
7). The title is in French.
8). The first one was five years ago.
9). The first one came out in a media storm, at the height of Trump panic, and people wanted to see the âevilâ movie.
10). Todd Phillips keeps doing interviews for some reason.
Those are the reasons why itâs dying at the box office
bruh
ik half of these but todds still doing interviews?
Itâs not one thing, itâs a bunch of things
i thought man just took the money and ran off to some shed in the woods
Apparently not
Plot twist: Ruby was responsible for Joker 2âs failure.
Who are you again
tfw the 2 year secret u been keeping in wasnt worth revealing
i highly doubt that especially with WBD and how little they care in the first place
No way they wouldn't care when they put $200 million towards it
a $200 million bribe test screenings not included
What a pathetic movie. No defending it. It's going to have a big second weekend drop for a movie of its type. Haha!
Phillips and Phoenix get what they deserve.
The weekend drop is already looking huge
I think this movie is just ok, not great, just ok. I don't hate it like most people do. Am I alone in finding it just ok?
not at all if i know i'm not alone for finding it good
no I think itâs just okay too
I donât completely hate it
this is so fucking funny
"harley quinn look I'm serious now stop singing"
This is a really unique take never would have thought of
dude is pretty clever
I used to think joker was a drama
but now I realize
It's a fucking musical
Joker 2 oscar SWEEP
âFolie Ă Deuxâ lands on home entertainment platforms on Oct. 29.
Dang that's gotta be a new record for one of warner's bigger releases
since the height of the pandemic at least
Bets that it get razzie?
They still do those?
The razzies suck
âJOKER 2â will release on Digital on October 29, less than a month after its theatrical release.
Read our review: https://t.co/FmG6BLEPyT
Can wait
Joker 2 is the Dragonball Evolution of superhero movies
Thatâs Fant4stic
No. Dragonball evolution is the Dragonball evolution of superhero movies
That meme was one of the only good things that came from it
My god, 81% drop in the second weekend is a record, even worse than The Marvels which had 78% drop.. this movie is gonna be one of the biggest flops ever.
So I guess there will be no joker 3
I just watched it in the cinemas tonight, Iâm not feeling like myself now. But hey, at least nobody ran away until the credits started rolling (FYI, thatâs not saying much).
If they didnât make it a musical, the movie probably wouldâve been alright. But fuck, the musical segments got progressively annoying, the ending makes that one scene from the trailer letâs face it, click bait.
And I swear this wasnât a teaser, that was like in the final trailer. Final trailers predict the final cut of the film, donât they not? https://www.out.com/media-library/lady-gaga-lee-harley-quinn-joker-folie-a-deux-courthouse-stairs.jpg?id=53777996&width=800&quality=85
I didnât get to see the fullscreen version sadly, just the widescreen crop instead. Just donât bother filming like that if youâre not gonna show it in certain cinemas and then lock it in the vault. Fucking release it.
I absolutely loved this movie. Iâve seen it 4 times already. Joker 2 is highly misunderstood. Itâs a fantastically beautiful film but also very dark, which is balanced out by the musical elements
Yes. Yes. Yes. and Yes
Hell no, all the musical segments got progressively annoying.
If they left those bits out, itâd be better. But we all know thatâs not saying much, the film is bollocks.
I disagree. The songs were amazing and catchy. The upbeat sounds juxtaposed the brutal reality Arthur was facing. Showing the fantasy he retreats to inside his mind. The film is brilliant
Fuck yeah <3. Fully agree.
Joker 3 will be about the new guy
This film destroyed pt 1
When Joker said to lead Arthur to Paradise, I wept
Yayyyy
I agree i enjoyed but I realised it could have been way better and it was still quite lack luster
but I still heavily enjoyed it from a technical point of view
Yes it was unnecessary
But that doesnât make it bad by any means
âMistuh Puhdllezâ
Can anyone tell me why so many people hate Joker 2? I mean I didn't like it, but I don't think is that bad, and people are talking like is the worst movie of the year.
Because:
It presents a completely different concept from the first film.
The majority of worldwide viewers (ticket buyers) likely expected a similar approach or tone to the original.
Most people enjoyed the first movie and will naturally compare the sequel to it.
Unfortunately, Joker: Folie Ă Deux falls short of being on par with the first.
The movie is a musical, and not a particularly good one. Many viewers around the world tend to dislike musicals in general, especially when they aren't well-executed and end up being a bad one.
i didn't think of Joaquin Phoenix's Arthur Fleck to be a character i would have to follow into a sequel.
imo the first movie had a perfect ending
there is no folie a deux in ba sing se
Tru
for one we dont know srthur ttuly dead. For one there is medical doctor on Arkham. Another could be a drram sequence likr in 1
It wouldnt unheard of to surive stab if he got enough blood in time
which im sure they have blood bag stored there
it depend in that knife hit any organ
I like to think srthur will survive and meet harlee
something tells me its not the last joker
Those are valid points, Maybe comparing it to the original might have influenced the analysis of this one.
I don't think there were compelling reasons to film a sequel, the story didn't seem to have a strong follow-up. What do you think about that?
Quentin Tarantino loved âJOKER 2â & says that Todd Phillips is the Joker.
âHeâs saying fuck you to the movie audience. Heâs saying fuck you to Hollywood. Heâs saying fuck you to anybody who owns any stock at DC and WB⊠Todd Phillips is the Jokerâ
(via: https://t.co/8IYB4yPBWE)
That's a interesting perspective
I mean most audiences prolly donât like that but I guess itâs one perspective lol
It sounds like satire xdd
Yeah just watched it. I meant to see it earlier. Anyway it was disappointing mess for me 4/10 or 2/5.
He ainât wrong
Heâs gone mental.
I think he is just being nice about it lol
Because most ppl who even hate it say that its a fuck you but in a bad way this is just that framed as a compliment
This was a great scene
One of the better musical numbers imo
Arthur Fleck gotta be one of the most tragic characters out there.
His lawyer was genuine and right all along.
âI loved Joker 2 when I saw it in Tel Avivâ is one of the more alarming things a person can say
ăQRT of DiscussingFilm (@DiscussingFilm):ă
'Quentin Tarantino loved âJOKER 2â & says that Todd Phillips is the Joker.
âHeâs saying fuck you to the movie audience. Heâs saying fuck you to Hollywood. Heâs saying fuck you to anybody who owns aâŠ
Idk the visuals n shit were nice
Like this sequence was cool but it shouldnt have been a dream
Yeah 2/5 movie, but cinematography was solid, and Phoenixâs acting was commendable.
Yes
Kinda is considering it's a day dream
what
In my head canon the movie never happened
It was just a dream arthurs having while being driven to the hospital after his first encounter w batman
đ It. Was. All. There.
The actors, the shots, the budget, the concept.
They just had to shit on it
Even it being a musical, like lotta audiences didn't like that aspect, but scenes with Joker singing like a maniac while murdering people would've been such a Joker thing to do
I still think the movie shoulda just been joker and harley along w a young patient arthur took under his wing escaping arkham and causing chaos in the city
Yeah, coulda opened the second half of the movie with the carbomb or some shit too
Woulda been cool if harley became more guilty as the joker persona started becoming more and more in control
I was kinda vibing with the movie up until the Gary scene
Did feel a little dissapointed that him hammering the judge was just a dream sequence
No i ment like him without the trial
But was aight, felt like "Damn ok we really rolling now"
Then got immedietaly shut down
Just arthur and harley escaping arkham with another guy
Yeah I know, just breaking out with Harley and doing anarchist shit
And the movie takes place over the span of a day
But even in this screenplay with a courtroom drama they coulda made it work
Could have it be so that while harley is becoming guilty the more vile joker becomes
The young patient that escaped w em becomes more fanatical
The guy that killed Joker is supposed to be Heath Ledger's Joker 
Makes no sense
Like Philips wanted to make his Joker canon to the Nolanverse, like what the fuck are you doing bro cmon 
Bro i think that was just a reference
He wanted to do it in the first movie, but Nolan was still at WB so he shot it down
If philips actually wanted to make it be like the nolan verse then it would make absolutely no fucking sense lol
But after the gorillion dollahs, critical acclaim of the first one
And Nolan now being out of WB
He went ahead with the cut smile thing
The movie already doesnt lmao
That makes no sense on multiple levels
"Arthur Fleck isn't the Joker"
*Then why in the fuck did you name the movie Le JONK, TODD!?!?!"
Cuz jonk looks allot better than
"Some fucking guy"
I find it funny that arthur fleck was just some random guy
Who impacted batmans life in ungodly ways
You just dont understand Todd's artistic genius
Clearly
Movie also cost more than Dune 2, idk what the fuck they did with the money
Apparently todd insisted they shoot at more expensive locations

So they probably rented out a real asylum and court house for the movie lol
I mean the sets looked nice, but not expensive lmao
Also yknow those musical scores
With Harley and Joker dancing on some set
That shit aint 200mil fuck outta here
Atp the only way i explained it is that todd talked his way into 200 mil
Spent the money he had to
And just burned the rest
Such a blast
Itâs so funny!
His old imaginary girlfriend is mean to him in court so he daydreams a big musical number where he kills everyone
Dudes rock
Lady Gaga sets a building on fire to the beat of showtunes
Their evil plans are to build a mountain and fantasise about hosting a TV variety show
Itâs exactly as ridiculous as the first one (which everyone took way too seriously anyway)
Hang on lemme grab a quick second screen
My boy can obviously sing
But you had to make him sound like this the entire movie
God damn you todd
Yes
Thatâs good
People donât have taste anymore
This is why we need The Joker
Arthur is the joker, and the guy at the end is also the joker
Arthur was at peace , he still lived a decently long life
even if it was fill with sadness he had moments of hapiness
Amen
Even his last moment he had a smile
I do wonder if it was his lawyer or harley isiting
Visiting*
But yeah he got to go out being arthur fleck.
Knock Knock whos there
Arthur fleck
Arthur fleck who?
" Im the same guy who killed murray"
we can escape
there is no we arthur..
all we had was the fantasy
and you gave up, man that was so sad that scene
I don't think he had a visitor
It was just the prison guards being in on the real joker wanting to kill arthur and making it happen
The fact nothing happened to Brendan Gleesonâs character despite his actions is crazy.
SAâd Arthur and killed his friend Ricky.
We really do live in a society
I needed a good joker
I assumed the visitor was bruce
Coming to talk w arthur to get a semblence of closure on things
And that gets taken away from him by the real joker
Nah
Thereâs no visitor
Bruce is a child innit
Harlee or th3 lawyer
Could maybe visit with alfred
Hed be like 12 in joker 2
He didnât it was just a setup by the guards to have him killed.
Why did the guards want him to be killed
ig to make sure he dosent snitch on them killing his friend
They just hate him tbh
Nah thwy wouldn't of kil him
He was gobna get the chair anyway
100 percent it was eother harley quin or the lawyer
Lawyer would want to represent him in the trial again
So allegedly an earlier draft of the script
Had Harley killing Joker and taking on the mantle
Which aside from it still being kinda dumb, was miles better than some random ass guy
And taking his actual fucking name
Tf you mean he isn't "The Joker"
Well it kind of fits the Joker of dark knight
he is a guy with no personality who create all these differnt story to how he got the scars
If you notice he tells 3 different origin story to how he got the scars
Yeah but its stupid
Probably because the real reason is lame
If you got different guys
that he kileld some guy and then became joker
Who are "The Joker"
Like in a literal sense
If it was more so that like Harley, then Zsaaz, then Pyg or whatever
Took over the Joker mantle
More as a spiritual embodiment like Batman -> Nightwing
Could fit, instead they had to make it like idek
Well harlee was emotionless, was weird, it was like she was on anti deprsant or something
arthur was ready to go and escape after the courthouse blew up
Idk whole movie shat the bed third act for me
Like the first two thirds of the movie became redundant
yea he was like na im the same guy who killed murray fraklin and she didnt care
thought they were gonna escape together
and he didnt even try to run from the cop
Harley was fine, could been more bombastic is all
Joker was the guy who I had issues with, like Todd decided "Yknow what'd be awesome, guards diddle Arthur and he's no longer Joker" like what the fuck man
well she that was crueled to arthur. like he ran across teh city and risk his life and was ready to escape up to the room
and maybe he could of became joker
Sure but toxic relationship is cool for Joker
after he got mental help
A co dependant toxic relationship idk
He got beat pretty badly
that could of taken out his manic high
Which is stupid
well he has mental illness, it comes with manic high, he probly was feeling untouchable but getting beat up and possibly allude to more
with the underwear coming off
could of broken him down mentally
manic high is follow by extreme low
Imma be real homie i dont really care lol
Was a dumb direction the director went with
And the box office and audience reactions proves it
Cant really justify or write your way around it, its just dumb no matter how some might wanna justify or explain it
For me it was like, after he fired his lawyer
yeah that was aweomse haha
And started showing up as Joker in court
can I fire my lawyer
I felt like that was meant to be the point of no return
haha he had to listen to all that bullcrap for days and finally he couldnt take it
They did that in the last movie, where him shooting Murray was the real "The Dye Is Cast" moment, but they went back on it a little in the first part of this film
Which ok
Then we had the courtroom scenes
Then it just went back Again like dawg cmon
Finally culminating in him just straight up dying lmao
I mean the real moment he was stuffed up was when he presented no defence at all
that is ridicolous
at least he could play into the mental illness card and alternate joker Persona to try and get a sympathy from the crowd
Nah i dont think it mattered, if he wanted to avoid the death penalty or win the case he'd have gone with the lawyer
To me it felt like him going Joker was a "fuck it" moment
ah true
and then in his closing remarks he really unravelled it
he said he killed the people cause he wanted too
And then he unintentionally survives the death sentence cause he inadvertently started a riot who stormed the courtroom when the guilty verdict was announced
And we had a french revolution style scene where the mob tears apart the jury, judge etc.
Yeah i noticed he said " I just want to blow it all up and start a new life"
And or he riled up his fellow inmates in arkham and broke out idk
maybe arthur knew it was coming?
he said that then half hr later the courtroom blows up
I would of like to see him as a joker that came to rule gotham
but he is probably too mentally ill
Ig we'll see in the future when more comes out but idk what the hell Todd was thinking
He wanted a shock ending i guess
both him and phoenix confirm joker is dead
so yea i dont think there will be a third
unless they will retcon it that he is rushed to emergency care in arkham
neither film was ever about a crime boss though lol, it was about a man struggling with mental illness and dealing with the heavy stigmatization and lack of care in the time period
im guessing they have top of line medical facilties with doctor on call
Yeah but thats what I mean, he doesn't need to be some mastermind- he just does what he wants impulsively in the moment, and he just happens to keep unintentionally grow his army of fanatics cause what he says resonates with em
Its a more believable story then a guy falling in a chemical vat and going insane
we got to saw the origin of the joker with a grit of realism
That is why it connected with so many
He was giving Charles Manson vibe the entire time, not smart, and just insane wackjob just spouting nonesense but charismatically
But yeah sucks he was never the real joker, only inspired the joker
Yeah he has a huge ego cause everyone bullied him
so he needed to had a large ego to cope
Which is fucking stupid, like what the real Joker only dresses like that cause he was inspired by another clown dude? What the fuck man
God damn it Todd
I dont think it was an âinspired a real joker moment evenâ
its just a cycle of violence and crime thatâs perpetuated by a corrupt and horribly negligent system
Also arthur's 6 kills is immedialty overshadwoed by whoever blew the court room. they maimed so many people and killed at least 30 people
harvey got his face burned too
This was never about the Joker persona(only a persona manifested by Arthurâs insecurities, a more confident side) but it was about Arthur Fleck, its about the mental illness
Its not about glorifying violence even in the face of a shitty society
They retconned one of the best scenes in the first movie too.
3 Wayne Corporates, His friend, Murray, (secret mom) and the therapist he kills in cold blood at the end
But Todd was like "nah he just imagined it man, he never went full Le Jonk"
Yall realize this desire for the violence is exactly what the films both preach against right lol
The movie: This was never about the Joker persona
Also The Movie:
Thatâs a poster lol
Todd originally sough approval from the CHrisopher nolan to have a full health ledger joker
Origin moments,
But nolan denied him
so that is what we ended with,
just a guy cutting a glasgow smile
But yeah i bet no one would even notice arthur was gone, if some guy just showed up dress as the joker ready to command the goons
Creating a badass origin story for his scars
that changed each time he tells it
the camera work, sets, acting, even the script lines were amazing, thats my cope
i tried and failed to make sense of the screenplay
its... beyond human reach
feels like a fake DC film
like it was all fairly decent for the most part, the first movie wasnt that spectacular either
and the first 66% of this one was actually better imo
And then the ending had u like wtf.
but then arthur going back on joker, joker dying, dying to a rando, shoehorn ledger joker, uh etc. etc.
yeah i was in the cinema for waiting for post credit, couldnt believe he died
was like a roller coaster than reached the peak but never fell down
joker can die, thats fine- it was just in such a dumb way
But it not really fair, he didnt get a happy ending
yeah but he doesnt need one
edgy ass im the joker baby type shit
if this is how we went out
but its the guy we related too since first movie
like jury reaches guilty verdict
he says nah fuck yall going out my own way
dies like this
after killing the courtroom
and his death results in city wide revolt idk
yeah but most people werent complaining wether it was sad or not
if it was sad tear porn ok fine
its just his death was lame as fuck
and outta nowhere
at least he tried to fight and run but yea he took too many stab, there is also a possible he could of live if hes rushed to the doctor at arkham the guard could be like wtf and went back
wasnt even his death it was him pulling a "im not the joker baby" gtfo todd
Yeah he was being honest, he felt regret for killing ppl, the first 3guy he killed was threatening his life sure its self defence
then he kept killing people after that for no reason
only the first 3 was justified
Randall murray and his mother was unprovoked
He couldnt live with that lie anymore i guess he felt guilty about the last 3
after seeing what it did the midget
The only guy he really called aquiantance
he was like arthur why did u do this to me man, i have nightmare every night now, and he cant ever relax
also when that kid he kissed died too
due to arthur indirectly
Hearing from all those people how the "joker" has affected them must of weigh heavy on his conscience, then seeing ppl dying indirectly due to Joker
Weird thing is Nolan original idea was for Arthur to carve the glasgow smile into his face at the end, Nolan denied it, but nolan doesnt work at WB and they had the rights to do it
It was only out of respect for nolan work that todd changed the ending
Yea but that worked since we had no idea who heaths joker was
There were no files on him and even bruce couldnt find his identity so we had no idea how he became the joker the multiple stories could have a true one among em
Which dosent work the same since this joker is some random asylum inmate who just carved a smile into his face and probs has files abt him in the asylum storage
I feel like Ledger's Joker would be some CIA PTSD operative
Yea same
His lines about a truck of soldiers, his specialty in explosives, him not having a file makes sense- etc. etc. but that is to say not having an actual answer
Is the gold standard
And the CIA or ex soldier as just the common fan theory is better
The social inspiration was also 911, whereas Phoenix was the incel thing
So CIA/soldier would also closely tie in with the whole terrorist vibe of Ledger's Joker
My head canon is that he had an abusive dad, developed some mental health issues and dealt w them best he could and then married
Joined the military and got good at it
Then was in a operation that went to shit and he got disfigured
Nah I felt like the marriage and dad part was just shit he made up by looking at them, him being able to pick apart Gamble had an abusive dad just by looking at him is such a Le Jonk move
And Rachel uh, having 2 guys trynna get her so he picks a story bout pleasing his wife
Shit like that
Nah im just tryna combine the 2 stories
Yea ik but i like making shit up too lol
Anyways tho he escapes and comes back to arkham only to find that hes basically beeb erased by the government
According to Todd Philips he's just some random psycho from a prison ward who dresses like a clown cause he liked some other dude who dressed like a clown đ€Ą
And that makes him become the joker
Yeahhhh
Thats good
But also he began to hate the system and the "schemers" cause maybe he idk
Was forced to do war crimes while on deployment
Like he napalm bombed an orphanage idk lol
Im not gonna lie
This movie ruined my whole week lmao
I mean I knew it was gonna be shit but idk
Yk
I wonder how long robin will last as batman in the nolanverse
Bros just some random cop whos gonna go become batman lol
Considering how police handle things
I think he'll be aaaalright đ
"Where's your karate"
"Here's my motherfucking karate đ« "
i dont think hell be killing people
also his ass aint stopping the joker
Oh nice all the clips are out now?
Can someone find the fullscreen version of the film before it becomes lost media?
I think we go through this every time a film is shot on 70mm film, they never release it outside of cinemas, and it becomes lost media (as in no one bothers finding it).
I canât imagine this big budget WB movie is just going to vanish
Now had it been swept under the Max rug maybe
Or whatever theatrical release strategy WB begrudgingly gave to Juror No 2
Yeah thatâs the popular theory.
I would of like to see arthur get clean up. Grt a job and career in stand up comedy
He was still young enough to fix his life
He seemed happy about harley bringing him into a family with the pregnancy
I could see arthur becoming successful
This is an experiment. Alive until the hammer gets me....hope not...but nevermind.
Chapters:
0:00 Intro
0:25 AMBITION
1:03 PUNISHMENT
1:07 LONLINESS
1:37 THE PAST and THE FUTURE
2:02 TESTIMONY (1)
4:13 PERFECT MASH-UP
4:45 KILL YOUR AUTHORITY
5:25 TESTIMONY (2)
5:41 THE JOKER EXTRAVAGANZA
6:01 ONE AT THE START, ONE AT THE END
6:38 THIS GOES WI...
I did a better experiment and not watched either of them at the same time lol
This film is a master class of how to perfectly shoot and produce a dogshit movie
The ending got me in a chokehold
The vid or movie lol
donnie and sharks hateship needs to be studied
The perpetual bitterness, the unspoken yet subtle homoerotic tension. Its a freudian relationship 
YOU FORGOT THEM
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTFvjqa2h/ apparently itâs a masterpiece
TikTok
116 likes, 6 comments. âReplying to @MichaĂ«l Also check out Quentin Tarantinoâs assessment of the movie also confirming I was right đ€·ââïžâ
I wasn't the biggest fan of the first Joker. But I think after watching this, Todd Phillips kind of broke down the joker psyche with a fresh take. He seems to understand the type of aggression joker was intended to mix with his misguided delusions.
Again I didn't find the first one to be as nuanced.
There's a blend of the showmanship and raw anger that was shown perfectly here.
I guess the original 1.43:1 version is officially lost media now.
Why bother filming it that way anymore if youâre not gonna do fuck all with it after it leaves the cinemas?
i like movies
Nebula: https://go.nebula.tv/mancarryingthing
Letterboxd: https://letterboxd.com/ManCarrying/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/ManCarrying
Merch: https://mancarryingthing.com
Our second channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8aGE10t6QrcdRMpgorwkAA
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/mancarryingthing
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@ma...
You people
horrible ending my god. Horrible
honestly
the more i think abt it idk why tf todd felt the need to attack his audience
like bruh they basically gave u millions for your movie and loved it, idk why u gotta make a cinematic fuck you towards em
Iâve been doing some thinking. How is Arthur getting beat up and stabbed considered as attacking the audience? Heâs been treated like shit the entire first movie
I get him giving up the Joker persona may be an offense to the audience but thatâs probably because he just simply had regret for his actions. He wouldnât have committed the murders in the first place if he wasnât getting attacked by everyone
Bruh, it was disgusting.
Me tbh
Yeah, exactly. The ending felt inevitable
because it implies that he wasnt the "real" joker and that the guy that killed him was the real one
which ruins the first movie and makes it sorta worthless
But technically there were many jokers in the first movie too
yea but those were just supporters
Not just because of the masks but because they related to Arthur
arthur was ment to be THE joker
also it sorta goes against who the joker is if he got inspired by arthur
since joker getting his identity from some random guy is stupid
Maybe the whole point is that anyone can become the Joker after one bad day. Thatâs what he was trying to prove in the Killing Joke
he tried to prove that anyone can be as insane as him
not literally become him
it goes against the character if hes inspired by someone else
But in this universe the joker is more of a symbol
honestly yk what
Because if Harvey Dent and Bruce Wayne can exist in this universe there could be a chance that Jack Napier and Harleen Quinzel can exist too
the idea of joker not being one guy but a literal force could go hard
just wish the movie was more satisfying in the third half
since he just gets treated like shit w nobody that treated him like shit really getting justice done to them
but if jack became the "real" joker itd literally go against what joker is
Bruce Wayne got a proper origin with his parentsâ getting shot so the real Joker that we know of can get his origin of falling into chemicals
dude
the joker dosent copy other people
hes the main star
his own thing
if hes just some super villain inspired by some random guy in the 80s that killed a bunch of people itd go against who he is
like arthur dying and being replaced fundamentally fucks up who joker is
I doubt the acid Joker would be inspired by other jokers. He would just go insane because of the chemicals
the he wouldnt really be joker
This is a good post imo
https://www.reddit.com/r/joker/s/FBubGDkk62
Still kinda love this movie tho
I love it deeply
Or maybe it's just how the joker curse gets passed on. Symbolising how they manifest.
I don't like the ending, but I get it
The general pitch of a mentally ill guy starting a movement too big for him, society trynna make some something he isnt and tragically dies to it- I can see being a decent standalone movie, but its not something that warrants a 200million budget
And the movie was marketed as something entirely different
Its like if you went to see "IT" and got an ok totally different film like "Lala Land"
I take it as an elseworlds truly
So it doesn't irritate me as much
I thought the musicals in prison and the courtroom was brilliant
I went back to see the first one, I didnt really think it was kino by any means when I first saw it but the way it was directed and the general pacing and strength of its individual scenes were so much more engaging and strong
Than its sequel
Yeah that was my criticism as well, the concept was neat but really poorly executed
The idea of an r rated joker film being a musical struck me as really daring and unique, but the musical scenes themselves were poor
Particularly cause the director didnt seem to know how to even do a musical
They were like ad breaks in a youtube video, wherein they just appeared randomly and didnt add to the plot- in musicals theyre usually like montages or important scenes that are directed with music and set pieces
Its when the plot really evolves and moves, when important things happen
Like action sequences in action movies
Whereas here they were all in his head, the sets were non existent, and meant nothing
See I felt the first one had overly stretched scenes, pacing was one of the issues I had which I didn't here, cause I got how they were pacing like a musical genre with the narration of jokers fantasies. And I thought that was unique.
If he really was murdering people in real space
And just had a bombastic music thing going on in his head
While he was carrying out Joker stuff, makes sense
Singing while youre murdering sounds like a Joker thing
Right
The courtroom too, when he fired his lawyer
And the following Gary scene was really strong
I really like a lot of the concepts
It felt like things were really winding up, but then it stopped abruptly
Yeah
Meaning directing wise, he never really built up to the || rape scene/ joker death || and it just happened randomly in the middle of a "The Joker vs. Justice System" build up
I never really liked the idea of lady gaga as Harley, I still don't. But as an elseoworlds story I get it
Gaga has a really strong history of like
Edgy costumes, musical numbers, lyrics
And had a really strong counter culture impact
Ala Marylin Manson
Like our time's Freddie Mercury
So I could see why Philips casted her as Harley, like I could see where it could be going
But same as the movie they just didnt utilize her in a meaningful way
There was literally only one scene where they tapped into the Gaga vibe:
Where she smears blood on her face, in a way that hybrdized eroticism and cannibalism, just HR Gieger kinda vibe
But that was literally just it
The singing was intentionally made poor anyway, so idk why he felt the need to cast a professional singer
If she wasnt gonna actually sing
Idk it was a movie for Tim Burton, was the vibe I got
If you wanted to make it edgy, dark and a musical
A live action r rated Tim Burton film where the director can meld music and a story whilst still retaining a dark nihilistic undertone
Die With A Smile really fits the filmâs aesthetic
They could have done more with her in terms of the image. Like the one in a concept art I once saw.
Use code filmento20 to get 20% off Doomlings: https://bit.ly/FilmentoDoomlings
Joker 2: Folie a Deux unites Arthur Fleck with Harley Quinn. And as weird as it sounds, the movie is horrendous. It was rated poorly and lost around 200 million dollars? Why? Because it's another Hollywood project that goes to war against its audience, trying to make...
Yes
Thatâs dope actually
Some are born blind, others deaf. But you were born without taste.
Its ok Rubes, im here for you
which fuckin sucks
joker isnt a copycat of someone, hes his own guy
like bruh aint no way the guy whos hell bent on being the center of attention at all times would copy someone elses schtick
In one reality, but it can be a personality or a mentality inherited by unfortunate circumstances. Which arguably is what inspires a lot of comic characters in general. Something that connects universally.
I take it as a character study from one perspective
what i dont like is how they basically just undo all of arthurs character development in this movie
like bro goes from finding himself in the first movie to just being a victim again
I get it, he didn't get the standout moment a typical comic joker is known for and I think we'll get that in Matt Reeves or James guns universe. How I see it is, Todd took a risk by making the joker personality a separate entity form the human in habiting it? In a way making joker immortal, while keeping the mortality of Arthur. It's diffferent, n9t my favourite but I see the perspective.
The âReal Jokerâ dresses up as a clown cause he saw someone else do it and thought it was neat đ€Ą
honestly
i hope there isnt one real joker for the toddverse
just have it be multiple jokers running around, like a literal force of nature
Woulda worked if they stuck with Harley being the one offing Joker
Instead of it being literally a cosplay larp thing
Joker, then Harley, next is ? But theyâre all the maniacal clowns
But nah literally same ass name n everything lol
Cosplayers
honestly the idea of the "joker" just being a faceless force that cant be punched out works perfectly
if only he wasnt stabbed to death by bootleg health ledger
Yeah the execution I agree with
yk what
Its not the best way
even tho i hate the movie ill change my mind on the idea
also i love that we have 2 versions of joker rn that basically do the same thing but differently
2 versions?
phoenix joker inspired a movement that outgrew him
keoghan joker is stuck in arkham but is helping out other villains w their plans and stuff
barry keoghans joker
i hope he never escapes arkham ngl
just the idea of joker fucking w gotham while locked up is sick
Nah I think kheogans version is gonna be something else
id prefer if he was just batmans hannibal lecter
But I don't think we'll see that for quite a while
but also helped inspire other villains by giving them ideas and manipulating them
probably part 3
That's more like Victor zaz
Keoghon Jokerâs cut scene was really cool
He was taunting Batman by saying tldr :âthe funniest part is you believe the people riddler is killing deserves itâ
keoghans joker has been shown to already have a hannibal like relationship w batman
And that Batman deep down wants to murder the bad guys
And feels as though that would be the right thing
But for some reason abstains
i loved keoghans joker icl
Real cool n dark, and not some good shit
like the designs im a bit split on
love everything but the hair
also the laughs great, sounds literally like a hyena
the voice could use some work
I kinda hope they donât use him
Iâd rather see non-Joker baddies
Keoghan is doing the same vocal tics and creepy ghoul stuff weâve gotten twice already
Give us Clayface
yea same
i do hope we see him tho
like for a small scene or sum if batman comes to arkham
Sure
But I donât expect it
Keoghan has a bit of a rep for being difficult and his scene was cut the first time so
Who knows
wait
fr?
i always assumed keoghan was chill on set
also i think they cut the scene cuz it would overshadow riddler
It wasn't cut because of him, it just didn't fit the story for Matt Reeves.
Which could mean anything
He released the cut scene, and if you watch it, you'll realise that essentially joker solves the whole case in that. So plot wise it didn't work for the Batman story we got, Kheogan was pretty good in it.
Yeah Iâve seen it dw
Keoghan is fine in it
Itâs a Ledger impression
Weâve seen it all before
So your info is inaccurate
Bot


