#đ„ Joker: Folie Ă Deux
1 messages · Page 2 of 1
I usually donât watch movies in meh quality(only for some), but I was curious about the plot due to the reactions.
I mean I also watch bad movies out of curiosity.
I do that with Telugu cinema all the time for example.
I havenât seen this yet but I already know this is a great movie and yall just donât get it
Lmfao as if this movie is complicated.
I watched it on a theatre and the musicals made no sense at all
I don't think I could watch this movie in a phone, even in a theatre it wasn't a easy watch
Even if I watch this again on TV with my home theatre set up, it ainât wonât mean really change my opinion at all. I ainât gonna say the movie is good overall because it looked great.
Audiences are trash right now. Its considered cool to mock anything weird or different. The mob is feeling saucy.
If a movie looks good, sounds good, is well performed and has an interesting POV
Then itâs worth having been made
Plot is the least interesting thing to me
As if itâs cool to make a movie called the Joker and then the character is anything like it. Todd Philips tried to be a hipster to deviate as much as possible from the character.
He's not sorry that he tricked you. It's very Joker-like that way.
Writing, direction, acting and cinematography are the core pillars of a film. In terms of the first three aspects, the movie was mid. Acting aside Phoenix, there was nothing special about it and Gaga canât act if her life depended on it.
This is you "Oh no. Darth Vader turned good again at the end. Bad writing."
Darth Vaderâs redemption arc isnât even comparable to this mess. What are you on lol
I would say Arthur Fleckâs Joker was never evil to begin with.
I'm just jerkin u. Seriously though, I'm sorry u hate it so much.
Dude, I generously gave this movie 2/5. People have been saying far worse things.
It isnât the worst comic book movie ever and itâs better than the worst MCU movies that released. Just disappointed about the direction Philips took.
Joker 2 for me is worse than any MCU movie, I was waiting for this movie to finish, I doubt I would have even completed the movie if I had watched at home tbh.
Definitely not as bad even with musical elements, which I found irritating.
Plot is super important for a movie.. Joker 1 had a good plot, Joker 2 doesn't. Yes the movie looks good, performance by Phoenix is good.. the music was okay but wasn't needed.
I didn't hate this movie for being different, I loved Joker and it was very different too.
Musical elements were so unnecessary in this movie.. Gaga's character wasn't well written as well with ridiculous motivations
It shouldâve never been there. Lady Gaga should stick with music.
She was OK, not horrible in this movie but again her character was meh
What do you mean by direction here
Out of curiosity
Cos direction is oversight of acting, cinematography, editing, grading and sound
Tbh, I expected it to be better after I watched the trailer. I bet many did.
Joker 1 takes its plot from another movie, yet it still works
Proof that the plot isnât what matters
Most movies share the same handful of plots
Itâs everything else that makes them work
It takes inspiration from several movies yes
Didnât expect Todd Phillips to go with the real Joker gibberish at all
He didnât
With the greatest respect, if your main takeaway from watching the movie is that Todd Phillips was doing a secret origin story for a second, more evil JokerâŠ
Then Jesus
You may truly be lost
So you liked Joker 2?
Didnât the movie literally end with buddy killing Arthur and then going and carving his face up aka The Dark Knight Joker
I enjoyed it
Yeah, a random extra carves his face
But you mightâve noticed that the movie isnât about that guy
And the movie also has literally dozens if not hundreds of guys trying to copy Arthur throughout
Thatâs like, the point
Not that this one guy is a supervillain
Well then why did the film pay special attention to this one guy lol
It didnât
Heâs not even in focus for the bit everyone is talking about lol
The ending is Arthur bleeding out on the floor
Cos heâs the main character
I think youâre missing the point
What do you think is the point?
What is the movie trying to say with that ending?
That doesnât mean itâs not a separate aspect in itself. Writing, acting and cinematography are specialised for a reason. Direction is the execution of the overall vision.
That's fair. The movie looks good for sure and the performances are good too, I just wanted more from this movie.
The point is that Arthur accidentally created a cult around himself, and when he disappointed his followers they killed him
That one guy is irrelevant
Heâs just symbolic of the wider following
Yall thought these were Batman movies
He doesnât even have a name
Yeah, Iâm not talking point as in what the movie was about
if he didn't carve his face that would've been an okay ending
I mean the point of what was being said here
And Joker doesnât have either.
these are like shitpost movies they're so funny
Arthur Fleck is his name in this movie
If you noticed
The real Joker doesnât have a real name lol
Ok so
Like Don didnât even say âoh the film was some secret TDK Joker originâ
Letâs dig into this
I kinda wish this movie didn't have musicals in it because it was so distracting like a serious scene is going on and then a musical number ..
the point is going through your head so hard bro
This is cruel. Leave him alone to stew
I came out of the movie thinking they hammered home the point a bit too obviously but like
you can't be serious what the fuck why would that be heath ledger
People seem to have missed it idk
is that supposed to be young aaron eckhart too then?
Youâre being ignorant for some reason.
The guy says a morbid joke
Carves himself a Glasgow smile paying a homage to Ledgerâs iteration
Laughs maniacally like the mainstream Joker
Itâs clearly meant to represent that heâs going to reign in as the Joker we know. Except in this movie he will replace the dude who influenced him and later kills him for not fulfilling the role.
this is why I can't understand Phillips for doing that carving thing at the end
Youâre still looking at it like a franchise
you can just not do it
people will spew shit like this
MCU brain has broken people
A lot of kids wanted to carve a smile on their face after watching the Dark Knight
And then you said the second line, relax.
I didnât say this is Heath Ledgerâs Joker. It is a homage.
Todd Phillips, who isnât exactly a genius himself, somehow overestimated his audience
The guy at the end waa basically a juggalo
Todd Phillips you're going to director jail after this one
I hated this movie but you are assuming too much by saying that nobody at the end who killed Arthur is gonna become the main joker, we simply don't know about him.. maybe he was a fan of Arthur as Joker and when Arthur renounced that identity he just killed him.. don't know what carving up the knife signifies.
Also I highly doubt we will get any more sequels of the Joker anymore.. in hindsight we never should have had a sequel.
Im an incel and i understood it just fine
Theyâve said they have no interest in a third
The only reason they made the second is cos Phoenix wanted to do a musical with the character
omg don't out yourself like this đ
It was originally gonna be a Broadway show
After the reception it has gotten.. zero chance there will be one now, plus I don't think the movie is gonna do well either.
I donât know what to refer that person, but clearly the person is gonna be the psychopathic Joker who will replace Arthur. Not saying itâs the same Joker from TDK lol.
All the comic lore shit people are fixating on was the furthest thing from Phillips and Phoenixâs mind
They wanted to do something weird and new
And they did
Also.. the first one made over a billion dollars and the studio demanded another movie to be made.
I respect that
Pff bring it on muhfuckas
Demanded?
Youâre making an assumption though
I respect this take and honestly the movie pissing off all the people who worshipped the first one is good to me
but also that weird and new thing also kinda sucks
The plan was only for a single Joker movie at first.. watching this Joker 2 makes it even more clear that they had no plans for a sequel as this movie is a mess
Something weird and new, where the sequel was a fumble lol.
I still like the first one
Yeah they wanted to make a musical and came up with a plot around it
I love the hustle
I loved the first Joker, Joker 2 is absolutely horrible
Well that was a big mistake
Somehow you think the movie is all about introducing the New Super Joker so idk if youâre a credible source on this
I liked it
Heath Ledger's Super Joker 2.0
The 2nd one isn't as good as the first, but it rings true as an extension of the first.
Again, that's your opinion which is fine.. I and vast majority of others didn't .
Why do it with a Batman aesthetic then? Why not just do his King of Taxi Driver do-over without it? You inherently land in territory of expectation when youâre tackling these specific characters, thus the anger around Harley Quinn not really being Harley, etc
literally just don't have the guy carving his face and dummies wouldn't be confused
Why do you feel the need to say âand the vast majority of othersâ
Are you that insecure in your opinion
Lady Gaga character was a total waste and with zero character development initially too. Also what was her motivation really
We can just be two people talking, you donât need backup lol
It wouldnât be when they gave the indication. It couldâve been some random inmate who didnât have display any signature characteristics of the Joker.
Th3 fantasy
I kinda like your stance Ruby go Ruby
They explicitly say her motivation was to ride the fame wave by latching onto Joker
Thatâs just text lol
I mean you have seen the scores but I'm not insecure.. just stating my opinions. Many didn't like it.
Sure but the scores are weirdly skewed
you're doing it again. Are you insecure?
Ruby droppin knowledge. I'm too lazy to argue with nitwits
A D Cinemascore is bizarre, and has nothing to do with critical reception
Made no sense to me and btw, are we to assume that she did the bombing as well ?
You can assume that if you like
Itâs ambiguous
It means most of the audiences hated the movie..
Arthurâs whole thing is inspiring violence
you can debate like normal people and not bring "most people think this and that" into it
Once of his followers was inspired to do violence
It couldâve been her or any other Joker Bro
Again, thatâs the point
No itâs more than that lol
There are only 22 films in history with a lower Cinemascore
what does this prove tho pawsin
Itâs not the 23rd worst film of all time
Something about it is provoking visceral reactions
In a way that crappiness like Morbius doesnât
seriously what does bringing general audience's perspectives into this conversation gain you
Which I find rlly interesting
I said the movie was pointless, which it was. It didnât serve any purpose. Also I find it laughable that you think your opinion is more credible because you liked the film and others didnât. Youâre just being a contrarian for the sake of being one.
Provoking that much anger makes it successful in some regard, from my perspective
You have to get under an audienceâs skin to hit a D
It's all subjective opinion anyways and I for one won't belittle people who liked this movie as art is subjective. For me it didn't work at all.
Morbius got a C+
Honestly i think it just boils down to being willfully strange, and audiences of late just jumping on anything unusual and tearing it down
Agreed
And Iâm glad it aspires to be strange and offputting
i mean joaquin joker in the og one is still probs tied w heath as my fav joker
To me, itâs far more worthwhile than cookie cutter crap like Deadpool 3
For at least trying something radical
Joker 2 discussion thread: Just back and I kinda loved it. I can see where it'll lose people, but at the same time I love the boldness of it. I love a director taking a crazy swing like this and the cast beyond brilliant. Phoenix is even more mesmerising than last time and Lady
yeah at least when it's bad it makes me feel alive like a little bit
deadpool just sucks
It gets an actual reaction, not just indifference
Vast majority of review bombing is in connection to a perceived âwokenessâ by conservative losers. Here itâs likely getting more slammed by the âwe live in a societyâ bros
A whole generation has grown up on spoon-fed cinema and now theyre in their 20s
At least Deadpool tried to be more like the comics and had us appreciate the comic book movies that came out in the past
D and W is miles better than Joker 2, I can watch D and W multiple times.. I can't with Joker 2, I believe I wouldn't even have completed this movie if I had watched it in home.
I do think Phoenixâs acting in some ways was better than the first one. Can agree with that.
oh my god we're comparing pieces of shit huh
Phoenix acting was really good I agree, including in this movie.
Wdym theyâre both peak?
my live reaction when i realized the last 30 mins arent gonna make the movie go from meh to peak:
funniest and most insane take Ive heard today I gotta respect that good for you for liking both
Tbh D&W was a pure popcorn flick and I enjoyed for what it is. Joker 2 is a different type of movie.
honestly when Joker fired his lawyer I kinda expected it to get interesting but it got even worse
btw does anyone else find it a bit weird we are getting 2 pieces of media revolving around batman villain released 1 month apart?
One thing I can take from the ending is that itâs the filmâs way of reminding the audience that Arthur isnât the one and only Joker. Thereâs many Jokers in that world
w the penguin and joker
Not really.. both are very different properties and not related with each other
No that stuff happens a lot
IP milking. Itâs the Sony strat but DC actually kinda got a few good ones
They had to release Penguin for people to watch and enjoy in case people didnât like Joker 2
D&W is among the most half-assed, boring films Iâve ever seen
We are gonna get Reeves Batman and Gunn's Batman at a similar time as well
Xmen?
o ye true
In the MCU
i remember when batman part 2 was supposed to release like 2 months after superman legacy
Thatâs good enough for me
At least D and W was fun compared to Joker 2
Was it fun
I think you got it so very wrong. It's showing the effects that Arthur had on the world, how people engage very weirdly with celebrities' and people's mental health and putting them on a pedestal. It's not supposed to show that there are multiple Jokera
that said, bad movie
Maybe if I was 5
honestly i havent seen d and w
It's out on digital already but you can wait for Disney plus release
listen to me, don't ever. Don't even think about it
i binged the first 2 deadpool movies and found the 2nd one mid af
just a nothing movie
Yeah seeing the different Deadpools on screen was fun because it shows that a Deadpool movie isnât afraid to go batshit crazy like in the comics
bro my theater is still screening the thing wtf
if 2 is boring to you don't watch the new one
it's not even close to 2
Objectively wrong, thereâs scenes in the film so how is there nothing /s
I mean the movie is hugely fun.. I watched it 3 times in the theatres
imma go wait for terrifier 3 to come out
Technically it is because everyone knew Arthur wasnât the same Joker from the comics that everyone knows and loves
DP1 is still the best
this is just being a meathead for being a meathead's sake huh like you know that's not what I'm talking about
Killing Arthur is like killing the idea of Arthur so DC can go back to having purple suit Joker in the movies
I do like 2 better tho
That serves me for forgetting putting /s for sarcasm is largely a Reddit thing đŠ
wym
i mean we are already gonna get different versions of joker in both the reeves and gunn movies
oh fuck im sorry I thought you were being like passive aggressive
Thereâs only like a few characters from the old comics in that movie. Even then it didnât capture the same fun and crazy charm that the Joe Kelly comics had
It was just something I always remembered from an argument about Black Adam where someone said it was a nothing film and the person they were arguing with clapping back unironically that the film had scenes so how was there nothing lol
The first film already dealt with criticism of celeb worship just like the movie it was heavily inspired from.
yeah exactly
thats why I said
kinda redundant
and stupid to try to do it a second time
Even the darkest scenes in the movie are toned down compared to the actual dark stuff that happens in the original story. The only things that make the film mature is the swearing and gore
atp im confused why todd didnt just ask to go make a movie about another batman villain or sum
imagine a scarecrow movie coming out in october
todd phillips' condiment king
the crazy quilt
That would be crazier than releasing a Nosferatu movie in October. Best saves scarecrow for the more fitting Christmas
i mean nosferatu has snow in it and people w beards, so ofc its a christmas movie 
He should never direct another comic book film lol.
Mask movie?
Hell no
âJOKER 2â is now estimated to have a domestic box office opening weekend similar to âMORBIUSâ
Read our review: http://bit.ly/JokerDF https://t.co/I7yHBzdIok
Seems to be joining Alice in Wonderland and The Marvels in movies with a billion box office having sequels that flop/underperform massively
The fact this is flopping while DP&W was a huge success hurts a lot lol
That was fine except they NEVER addressed it so it felt very icky and unncessary
Yeah it's tragic
lmao I just caught up on this chat and homie really watched a camrip of the movie
I actually agree with @low junco, people are being overly hateful of this movie. There are enjoyable parts of the film. It's not a fully terrible film but it's not as good as the first one imo
also I respect the profile picture @low junco, just binged season 1-3 and thoroughly enjoyed it
Show just gets better and better
S1 is good, S2 is great
And then S3 is just all bangers all the time
Eight episodes any of them could be a finale theyâre so eventful
Anyway
Canât believe Iâm on team Joker is misunderstood đ€Ą
my favourite episode of TV ever is the Rishi episode in S3
that was amazing
My fav was the Harper/Yasmin one two episodes later
That fight was brutal
amazing writing
Succession levels of violent insults lol
and my boys Robert Spearing and Eric Tao are in this film
I wasnât even sure thatâs what happened
Idk but i think itâs ironic⊠maybe not clever but representative of the people that idolize âcelebritiesâ, âinfluencersâ âŠetc just to tear them down when they realize they ainât as they had imagined.
Like this is just so overreactive
Ratings systems are so very useless nowadays
Negative reviewbombing, positive reviewbombing to counteract the negative, ironic positive reviewing really bad movies cause lol
What you wind up with is a number/letter that doesnât reflect the thing at all
I know Ms. Marvel wasnât the most regarded thing, but I really donât think itâs a 6.2 level
And this is why
do you think there will ever be a solution to combatting all the review bombing? like some sort of integrity system
I honestly am not sure. The malicious actors are dedicated enough to find any loophole
Ratings were always worthless
Unless you go for outright censorship the only real thing I can see effectively done is ensuring no spamming of the same copy and paste review or something
I never really look at the overall rating of something but I think if you find someone who has aligned with your opinions most of the time, I find their ratings of value
Werd
Itâs definitely more beneficial to see conversation as opposed to a quick peek rating
Even then thatâs not perfect because thereâs still plenty of winging about wokeness or something because one frame of a POC was visible in the trailer and they never let that go
wait really? didn't even see that over the internet lol
Thats mostly for franchise movies
This movie really isnât as bad as people make it out to be. Itâs totally unnecessary and baffling in many ways but itâs not worse than Madame Web
Oh Jesus. Idk if this is a satire site or not, if not wow https://worthitorwoke.com/joker-folie-a-deux/
Its not bad at all. The audience is
These takes
Criticising woke culture is one thing, but making a site based on it as cringe as the wokes.
Its for clicks
Most of these political "content creators" are doing it for money
These political commentators are as despicable as politicians.
âwokeâ i hate that word so much
just used by bigots to put down stuff that includes non-straight and non-white people/subjects
that site is shitty lol
Not even gonna botherđ
Not really that simple. But it can be, for a lot of people, sure. A show whose intended audience is "not left" will inevitably get a neo-nazi audience that over-uses and abuses the lingo
This is basically a more blatant version of how those âanti wokeâ people found out Homelander was a parody of them
Do you think only white as in European origin people use that word?
Lol
The pander is real
Of course, woke culture is real lol
Even the so called leftists donât deny it and use the word themselves
But, I agree that itâs pretty cringe that some of these political figures base their entire identity on criticising woke culture and do not talk about anything else. Itâs hypocrisy at its finest.
It seems today that all you see is violence in movies and sex on TV
*its
GR Olasal ran great
This is a absolute facts
the word was basically repurposed by alt right the ppl on right and now mainstream folks to mean anything leaning âprogressiveâ but also, âoh itâs got minorities, woke, oh women⊠woke⊠oh look there is something regarding lgbt⊠wokeâŠâ its so stupid⊠the word makes no sense⊠and is particularly ironic when looking at where it comes from https://www.merriam-webster.com/wordplay/woke-meaning-origin
https://naacp.org/resources/reclaiming-word-woke-part-african-american-culture
cuz itd be weird seeing a buff armord super ninja beating the shit out of a skinny insane asylum inmate whos in his 50s
These takes are dumber than the movie
critical drinker has entered the chat
How bad is this movie?
Everyone has been throwing pitchforks everywhere
And people quote tweeting their previous post of excitement to disappointment
I mean personally I loved it and I know plenty others here did too
https://youtu.be/Vc28lGev-2c?si=d6nhpY1XyT8UtIx2
https://youtu.be/xJ2ucBnjJ00?si=mGCA-Rx3_RJRpJ_V
Joker Folie a Deux Spoiler Review today! Beyond The Trailer's reaction & movie review! Ending explained! Easter Eggs! DC 2024! Lady Gaga Harley Quinn!
http://bit.ly/subscribeBTT
Joker 2 Folie a Deux Movie Review with SPOILERS today! Beyond The Trailer host Grace Randolph's reaction & review of Joker 2 in 2024 from DC and Todd Phillips! Ending e...
Making a sequel to Joker was a bold move for sure. Making it a musical starring Lady Gaga was borderland lunacy. But Joker 2's worst crime is that when you look past the song and dance numbers, its kind of a boring and pointless sequel.
đ„Patreon âș https://www.patreon.com/AngryJoeShow
đ„YT Join âș https://youtube.com/angryjoeshow
AngryJoe, OtherJoe & Alex review the Sequel to the Billion Dollar Hit Joker in Joker: Folie a Duex. Is it as bad as others have said? Find out!
đOur New Merch!âș https://www.roguesapparel.com
đŽAJS LIVE Youtube Channel âș https://bit.ly/38VZ4aY
đșAJS Twitch...
Writer/Director Todd Phillips returns to bring us the sequel that was never intended for the smash hit JOKER! Does it feel inspired, or feel like a cash grab? Here's my review for "Joker: Folie Ă Deux"!
#jokerfolieĂ deux #Joker2
@shell ivy here wat some reviewers think
HEY
LEAVE KARAMA ALONE
But yeah this looks like a dumpster fire
Iâll still protect Karama but damn, this looks bad. Iâm disappointed tbh
Huh
You heard me bud.
This town and big enough for the two of usâŠ
(This is cringe, Iâm sorry I canât think of any good one liners)
None of those are critics lol
Angry Joe is one of the dumbest guys on the Internet
Which says a lot
i went in thinking i would laugh at it but i actually enjoyed this. was even laughing with it at parts
I didnât say critics đ
just some reference frames
reminded me of blair witch 2 over how much of a "fuck you" sequel it was
and i love that personally. more directors should do that
also WB wanting a sequel so bad yet refusing to do test screenings for it is just such a WB move
Please stop laughing at movies. It's dumb.
don't tell me what to do
Laughing at movies especially this one is EVERYTHING!!!!!!
guys oh my god holy shit
the incel movie is woke now I love this
part of me is so happy this movie was made because I get to see this fandom having a tantrum and tearing itself apart
How is it woke?
yeah đ
I dont like it = woke?
I mean idk if they realize this but Zazie Beetz was in the first one as well so by their logic that one should also be woke
Im gonna watch this video. I couldnt hate people anymore than i already do. Whats the worst that could happen?
these movies really are just shitposts
So, supposedly they filmed 3 different endings for #JokerFolieADeux in case the real one (which âit didâ) leaked and they decided to NOT GO WITH THIS ONE???
Better yet ask them what woke means
So far, i think he thinks its woke because it has lady gaga in it?
But i think it boils down to "I dont like it = woke. The studios must hate me."
He explicitly says he wanted it to introduce another batman villain instead of Harley. THESE ARENT BATMAN MOVIES NUMBNUTS
It can't be woke cuz Gaga is barely in it
He's just sprouting based on reviews he read
Damn. Really went into this with an open mind. There's something to be said about trying to be something you're not and then letting people down when they're expecting so much more from you. Unfortunately that intertwines so well with this movie on the most meta level.
5/10
One thing I gotta say that I like about this is Hildur Guðnadóttir's score
And I do like the singing by Joaquin and Gaga here
It might not be everyone's cup of tea though I gotta say it's been a long time hearing Joaquin actually sing
At least Critical Drinker didnât call it woke
I already know this movie is amazing
Cause thereâs a female character
Cause heâs an actual genuinely good film reviewer
No he isnt lol
I disagree with a lot of his opinions but he rarely uses buzzwords and rage bait
Heâs a bigot grifter
Which Iâve gotta respect
Other people used to call him a chud because he always talked about the message being put into everything
That actually goes to Synthetic Man
Lmao
Him saying âthe messsagggeâ is unfortunately etched into my mind
Heâs not tho, the drinker is âcritcialâ itâs in his name heâd never pander to a specific demographic that leans to a specific side of a political spectrum đ€
Lol
Iâm comparing him to the quartering
The bar is quite literally on the floor
I never heard any right leaning Youtubers talk about actual politics though which is strange
Except for creators like TheQuartering
Iâm looking forward to seeing his short film, the trailer looked good
Alex rider type vibes
He has books too
Itâs mostly just female character=woke=bad
Critical drinker?
Oh yeah
Unless itâs Arcane and Invincible
Rogue Elements: A Ryan Drake Story
Rogue Elements: A Ryan Drake Story: Directed by Travis Grant. With Patrick Gallagher, Mike Dopud, Andrea Pavlovic, Steve Boyle. Ryan Drake, hoping to recover an asset, must infiltrate a fortified base, his every move watched by a shadowy figure. He silently makes his way to the base and rescues the asset. Hell breaks out when the figure makes it...
Itâs got an 8.6 itâs already better than joker apparently
Lmao
Joker 2 has the same rating as Batman Forever and Fantastic Four 2005
Or eeaao
Peak is peak
Yeah that is a little odd itâs cinema score is lower than Madame web which doesnât make any sense
Madame Web and Borderlands were at the bottom of the barrel for me
Higher expectations means bigger dissapointmeng
Also more kids are seeing madam web than joker
And also the same as Green Lantern and Ghost Rider
But id think the expectations were already low, a large amount of people online that follow film knew it was musical
Which kids?
and Iâd think most of the casual audience that liked the first would be turned off by musical
^^^
Theatre looked empty đ€Ł
Maybe that was Sony just buying tickets to make it look like ppl went to the theatre
The only people who know who Madame Web is are those who watched the 90s Spiderman cartoon or played Shattered Dimensions
The actors they hired are popular with younger demographic
so they trying to appeal to that group like Sydney Sweeny from euphoria, and the Latina
Isnât she supposed to be super old though
I think Mercedes something
Sydney? I think she is in her 20s
Oh wow late 20s đđ€đŸ
Maybe you Dakota?
No Madame Web
The movie serves as a origin for Madame web
And how did they think it would be a successful movie without Spiderman?
Man who cares about that
lololol letâs watch movie
you can see greatness
Do you thin they will release a joker 2 on digital faster?
Definitely
Why are musicals like the most contentious genre lol i dont get it
Literally what the hell was this movie
I donât know đ, the color purple musical was fire
Having sat with it a bit I'm finding myself liking it a little more.
The idea of trying to twist yourself into something people will love you for but that being something that actually betrays yourself, then you just try to actually be yourself and the people you thought would be there abandon you while you suffer through other shit. Kinda resonates a bit.
Still a 5/10 though.
That's because both of those filmmakers were major influences to him, so of course he would give them major shout outs.
This movie deserves to go into the trash can.
What a load of crap.
I'm so confused with that ending lol why on earth did they think that would resonate with people
Like jesus christ
The animation at the beginning had more soul put into it than the rest of the movie
It was so good of an ending righttt
Im not being ironic i think that was the best way to end it
That's Life
I genuinely thought ||Lee was gonna confess that she set up the bomb because she wanted to kill him after he denied his Joker self, I genuinely thought they were setting her up to be something more sinister but I'm just stupid I guess ||
Absolutely the ideas in the movie sound so great on paper
Kills me when a movie has great ideas but i disagree with the execution
like honestly the things that bothers me most about the movie is not that it's a musical, but how it presents as a musical. after the third slow musicless singing between arthur and lee i was getting annoyed
but i actually love the idea of this being a musical
im like 90% sure the music was original? at least mostly?
and i wonder if it would've been better as a jukebox musical. with maybe just like "we're gonna make a mountain" and "im the joker" as the original songs
There are many issues with the film, but it ainât woke lol.
What is with Coppola
https://fxtwitter.com/discussingfilm/status/1842732699213046252?s=46&t=_AWFhpIAIwbUeGd6RdGh0A
Francis Ford Coppola says heâs a fan of âJOKER 2â
âEver since the wonderful âThe Hangoverâ he's always one step ahead of the audience never doing what they expect. Congratulations to Joker: Folie Ă Deux!â
Read our review: http://bit.ly/JokerDF
I think he only said this to spite the MCU fanboys.
Maybe the society was the friends we made a long the way
I truly canât imagine this movie being that bad
I guess Iâll have to see
I mean itâs mid, but yeah definitely not the worst movie that even released this year.
It was a jukebox musical
They just took all the soul out of the music
It was like Todd Philips, Scott Silver, and Joaquin Phoenix hated the people that loved the first one, so they made the sequel to fuck with them.
It just feels like a $200 million âfuck youâ.
tfw Megalopolis and Joker 2 is a better Joker and Harley than the Joker and Harley in Joker 2
it's joker time
Lord that makes it worse
(I didn't recognize any songs except for one. Maybe two. Hence why I figured it was original music)
Is it just me or does the blood splatter look like itâs edited in
It is
idk if I'd call it interesting, so much as it makes zero sense
Oh, and it made front page of The Wall Street Journal: https://www.wsj.com/business/media/200-million-joker-sequel-is-a-box-office-bust-9b92a7c0?st=NL2p8T&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink
I 100% agree
To be fair Ferrari came out last year and it wasn't as bad as Megalopolis
Jeremy and Al are next
Holy shit, this makes me wanna see the movie more
Itâs like a 4
Wild that this is worse then Madame Web
so funny
I donât think so
I agree
Itâs just an unfortunate misfire in my mind
Haha! This movie is a joke! We are all united in our hatred for it, critics and audiences alike!
My well thought out review
Over hated
Still bad though.
A huge disappointment, almost like the filmmaker has such distain for the audience.
Why would a filmmaker displease the people that loves his work?
It doesn't make sense.
This movie will make people hate directors because they can have such egos.
This movie made me side with studio interference. Why the fuck did they give Todd Phillips full creative control?
What a stupid mistake.
Never go full âHeavens Gateâ
It's not even that he deconstructed the deconstruction, because that can still work if you're not a terrible storyteller.
It's just that it was done so lazily and with such a slapped-together story and script.
This movie is gonna flop so badly and hopefully next time when studios force a sequel of a movie there will be due diligent before putting the movie out. That clearly wasn't the case with Joker 2.
They just won't leave things alone.
He's an awful hack storyteller.
I personally found this to be such a strong portrayal of mental illness and the stigmatization that has been placed around it, the corruption of systems and the darkness of sensationalized violence. Broader way of what I describe in my review.
Beautiful film exploring these themes and ideas, executing them so wondrously. Great musical and song choices. Praises the fans of the original and rebukes the toxic incel crowd.
Folie Ă DeuxâŠthe madness of two. Arthur Fleck, a mentally ill man who needs proper treatment - his lawyer represents those who want him to get help and thrive, to help the mentally ill against the stifma - and heâs oppressed at every turn by society. Him being placed in the corrupt Arkham is symbolic of the stigma and problems those with mental disorders and illnesses face. Lee, who represents the toxic side of the fandom and such behaviour in a more universal sense - they who want Arthur, per example, to stay in the pit, tk net be helped - using him as an icon for their own gain with no care for the man behind the persona, the fantasy.
Once he reaches his breaking point and rips that fantasy away, people lose their shit. He clearly develops a certain remorse for the murders he committed, and by the end is accepting his guilty verdict not with tearsâŠbut a laugh. Even knowing it means the death penalty.
When he goes and wants Lee to run with him, all he wants is to get away. Be with the woman heâs fallen in love with; get away from the terrible, oppressive hand heâs been dealt. But she discards him with pure disdain, angry that he isnât what she wanted him to be. Angry that he didnât lean into the persona.
She and the Joker supporters in the film are clearly the driving force of his demise. Lee is playing him for a fool indeed, and essentially forces the Joker persona onto him, to ill effect and hurting him further. He gets ||raped|| because he, a man who needs proper mental treatment and therapy, has been manipulated by his lover and âfansâ into trying to be someone he isnât. That is the cause. They pushed him into playing that part, without caring what the consequences for him were - they wanted the sensationalized spectacle, the anger, the metaphorical blood spilled.
Its a heartbreaking story of someone whoâs turned against himself and in the end, dies because of how heâs been manipulated by a toxic supporter base, whereas the non-toxic fans - also represented by the aforementioned lawyer - wanted to help him. Yes, he killed people, but that doesnât make him deserving of horrific dehumanization. âHelp, not executeâ is a big point of the film. Execute in a more metaphorical sense, as Arthur is executed by the constant manipulation from those who claimed to be there for him. He doesnât need to be forgiven by those close to the victims, but he should be sent to a proper facility so he can better live in society.
Iâll go into more detail at a later date but I wanted to say something more brief. 
Oh oh also.
The way Arthur dies in the end overlaid with the âJoker & Harley showâ section is so important to the themes of glorification of sensationalism in regards to violence.
âLetâs give the people what they wantâ And then Harley shoots him, just after a scene where the two were having fun together.
This symbolizes how a certain subset of people would rather see sensationalized violence than allowing Arthur to thrive. The way that scene returns after Arthur is stabbed was powerful. A double foreshadowing as well - Lee betraying and leaving him, and his death.
w-why did they make this
like its actually not a bad story and i get what they were trying to do
but it was just so unnecessary even for being a sequel
Listen.. I don't blame the studios for wanting to make a sequel after a movie makes over a billion dollars but try to make it right and take your time as well instead of mandating that the sequel must be made soon and there's no quality control.
Come on.. its Hollywood, a movie makes a billion dollars out of nowhere.. they will try to make a sequel
that is what i meant by this
even for being a sequel, which sequels are normally unnecessary asf, this was just stupid.
It's very obvious that they made it because the first one did well
I have seen this argument going around that Batgirl and Coyote vs Acme were test-screened and still got canned but Joker didn't get test-screened and made, but like... dawg, it's incredibly clear what their intentions were
The real question is why did they approve this final cut lol
I guess they didn't test screen to avoid the big ending reveal from leaking
Well that went very well for them huh
I donât think that works as a concern any more in the social media age.
Also, for people that hear about the stupid contrarian bullshit story and script, most will just save it for Max rather than taking the risk of seeing a bad movie in cinemas.
This is the 28th movie in cinemas that I've seen in six months, but think about more casual moviegoers. Do you think they're up for prison rape being framed as some kind of corrective thing?
It lacks audience appeal. This is why it opened $15M below The Flash.
They tried !,
Jared's Joker is not much better tho lol
Letoâs Joker is the worst Joker of all time.
At least Phoenixâs performance in the first film was acclaimed.
SS2016 was such a bloody mess lol but yeah
The âDamagedâ tattoo is so funny
phoenix was great in this one too
Yee!
Problem isn't Phoenix performance as Joker including in the sequel.. he was as good as before
Iâd like to hear thoughts on what I had to say here <3
I wanna discuss that stuff
That very good dissection , i think the ideas and subject matter of the movies are really good.
this movie has an challenging task to overcome, it has to live up to the expectations of the first movie being beloved by its target audience, and also the movie being hated by critics, it also has to deal with more inflamed âreviewingâ practices ie review bombing things based on âpolitics and divisivenessâ which has gotten more and more prevalent.
Also it didnât help that they chose to switch from a drama to musical, when musicals arenât as âpopularâ. I think a musical wasnât the right way to explore this subject matter as a sequel. Swap out the musical portions for more character scenes, or more story.
I get that an appeal to popularity isnât that great, a musical was not a good direction for this⊠just the word musical is gonna cut viewers off unless itâs some kinda Disney musical.
Take the color purple 2023, this musical was absolutely fire, the music bits enhanced the story rather than detract from the flow.
It didnât do well box office wise, pretty sure it flop
Wonka did well cause its family movie released in a festive time of year. Story is a lot more simple and easy to digest for most people
with the joker movie⊠the topic of mental health is divisiveâŠ
I think the major dislike I have of the movie is the fact that the Musical aspect isnt fantasy
It's quite odd to me that half the time the musical parts are actually happening and Lee and Arthur and singing together ect, and then half it's just Arthur in his head ect
it feels quite odd and forced, more a musical for the sake of being a musical not to actually add anything
I wish they kept it so when Arthur was dreaming/fantasising sure he's singing and we get the musical aspect but when its real life there isnt a random song breakdown
Because the musical scenes are really cool and I liked seeing them, seeing Joker being super charasmatic and seeing how Arthur really thinks of himself was so cool, not to mention all the musical scenes were technical masterpieces from Cinematography to editing ect ect
Why did he save this for an EW article rather than the film itself?
Lego Joker >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
lego joker is actually the best joker
This seems odd, these reporters are more up in arms about joker 2 performance vs Borderlands, The Crow, Acolyte, Madame Web was Joker 2 really that much worse then the others?
I mean, Joker 2 cost significantly more and had way higher expectations
True that is a good point, what was its budget?
Movie: Budge, Profit ROI
jokey2: 200m, 121m (0.6)
borderlands: 110-120m, 30m (0.26)
the crow: 50m, 23.7m (0.46)
Madame Web: 100m , 100.5m (1.05)
Acolyte: 230.1m, ???
I get the higher expectations part but still there budgets were not to crazy
that why there ROI fractional itâs produced at loss
Good point
And whereâs Harold
The general, but not always applicable, rule of thumb is 2.5x needed for break even
So we can estimate Joker 2 needs around 430 million just to break even
And it just opened domestically with 40
Thatâs why itâs a big story
Ah okay, bet
Ah okay, is it cause budget cost doesnât take into account marketing costâŠetc? Isnât box office from ticket sales
Thatâs right
The budget you see is just the production budget
Oh gotcha, so actual budget is higher. Is there any spot to get actual budget data?
Or is that privy only to studios
Yeah they keep that close to their chest
Thats why 2.5x to find the break even is a general rule of thumb, sometimes itâs less sometimes more
For example the Jurassic World trilogy cost like 900m
844.7million to be exact
The trades have rounded this up and said $500 million
Just to rub it in slightly further
Theyâre screwed lol
Yeah I think thatâs definitely too much
For super rough estimate though, using box office / budget would still be valid or no? Or just adding in scaling factor to budget to account for that would be better
But we want it to sound worse than it actually is!
Youâd need to scale it up
Is todd philips cooked?
But itâs not an exact science
Because like I said it can be more for some films and less for others
He just made a box office bomb that is getting ripped apart
Nah guy is fine
Heâll make Hangover 4 or something
Donât the actors still get paid
âGuy Tripâ with Bradley Cooper and Dylan OâBrien or some shit
Thatâs not a good amount
Yeah thatâs very bad
Well
When did it come out?
Its all relative to expectations and budget
120 million opening weekend for a dark R rated musical isnât bad
Opening weekend is always gonna be your biggest, and after that you depend on word of mouth
For returns
But word of mouth is dire
So itâll trail off fast
They regret sending that to Venice lol
Yup
Honestly people might go check it out out of morbid curiosity
Some inside & outside the studios are saying that premiering at the Venice Film Festival was a risk that didn't pay off as the movie's bad reviews hung in the air for a month as the movie waited to open.
Quoting Borys Kit (@Borys_Kit)
Who's to blame for JOKER 2 bombing? Everyone and no one. Previous WB regime, current WB regime, Todd Phillips...
Joker 2 crashed and burned so that the penguin could run and leap
Yea but career wise is philips in trouble?
Hilarious pivot if true
Would be quite the bounce back
She can eye it up but she ainât getting in
Ooof
Idk, heâs good actor, but his project picks have been kinda bad. Like Napoleon was super bore to watch and this joker movie ainât a good look.
Maybe he should do some tv show work like Star in hbo tv series
Not to mention him ducking out of the todd haynes film like very close to shooting start
Which movie was that
no i ment todd philips
phoenix is alright since his performance is getting praise
Oh whoops my bad I flipped them, whatâs todd track record like outside of these joker movies
The hangover trilogy
Starsky and Hutch
honestly im wondering if man fucked his career up
cuz guy went from a hit like joker to joker 2
It really isnât that much of a suicide
really?
Like yeah it lost money but so did Madame web and morbius and many many other films that are 100000% worse than this
Like after morbius they still hired the writer for Madame web
yea but the difference is that joker 2 cost more than morbius and madame web combined
and philips has publically said hes done working with dc
Wonât be missed
Also itâs pretty unfair to blame the failure of a movie solely on one person
Especially a film made by Warner Bros
also wtf is up w studios letting the morbius writers keep getting work
legit bombing spree atp
true
honestly this movie was doomed from the start
Yup
apparently it came to joaquin phoenix in a dream and he phoned todd abt it
A sequel that never needed to be made
and then shit went on from there
I could gush about this film a lot lol.
Sad its flopping.
I wouldnât take that seriously if I were you. These actors lie in interviews for clicks
Or for shits and giggles example, Michael Gambon
you got multiple instances of them talking abt how they wanna focus on arthur and stuff
but ye fair enough
honestly i wonder what the movie woulda been like if wb just demanded they have it set up its own universe or something
like they could have had a whole new universe developed full of other villains rising up after jokers television moment
Would have flopped harder imo
doubt it
Matt Reeves Batman, Tod Phillips Batman AND James Gunn??? So unnecessary to have two grounded universes
ik but like people love it
both joker and the batman were hits
and the main criticism i see w joker 2 is the fact they just shit all over arthur and make both movies sorta needless
People love it until they donât (superhero fatigue)
I would have personally hated if they took a perfect singular joker story and spun it into a universe
I admittedly donât think Iâd have loved the film like I do if they went the universe setup route.
Yeahh not everything needs to be a universe
Exactly
i mean they could have kept it its own thing but i think general audiences woulda liked it more of it wasnt a musical and just focused on arthur being the joker
as generic as that sounds
stories become more about how does it set up the next one and cameos rather than an original story with character arcs and good creative development
btw off topic i just googled dc black movies cuz apparently joker was ment to set up a new line of films to focus on more adult stuff for dc
and im so confused
Why are general audiences so allergic to musicals lol
Like in general
i think cuz its been a while since weve gotten a musical thats really popped off
From what I gathered from my non-cinephile friends, they find them boring and too out of the ordinary
also i think most people were confused with the move they made from dark drama to musical
So many of my friends canât get through the first scene of La La Land without finding it cringe and turning it off
Though TBF it definitely still retains the dark drama elements
Oh so they arent fun
Slight sarcasm
Yup
Lol
i should watch some more musicals
Oh no for real. I tend to believe so many people are closed minded when it comes to media
Yeahh
I hope I donât sound pretentious here but I do think a lot of the GA is too close minded and unwilling to explore
btw what do you guys think abt the theory that the joker movies are a prequel to the dark knight trilogy
i find em beyond stupid
Agreed
What lol
yea
They must have some good connects
Franchise brain rot
some people unironically think that joker 2 sets up heath ledgers joker
which makes absolutely no sense
That feels like such a big misread lol
it is one
also it makes no sense considering the timeline and the fact we see harvey dent
or the fact heaths joker has absolutely no files on him in any database
ppl are prob just having fun with speculations
Itâs because he does the same laugh
I canât remember exactly what it is but he does something similar
||i do think the guy that stabs arthur is gonna be the actual joker to fight this universes batman ||
they probs wanna set up a younger guy to go fight him cuz itd be weird seeing a buff highly armored ninja vigilante discombobulate some skinny 50 year old mental patients whole body
but since we aint getting no sequels(probably) it dosent really matter
You could whatâŠ.
Gush
Oh
Like Gushers?
Gushers?
Is this a meme i missed the boat on oof
Ohhh i havent heard of those in many years lmao
A lot
wanna see my review?
Yes, lady Karma Bestow upon me youâre knowledge
hey karma what did you think abt the penguin?
Havenât seen, I very rarely watch shows and donât have the sub service
honestly loved this concept
He didnât need to do the Glasgow smile thoughâŠ
but saw some stupid site try to grab clicks in going, oooooooh this egg easter will tie or links to dark knight woah
but like no
cause fucking harvey dent is in this
what would of been a better alternative action to do instead of that in the scene?
Just make him laugh hysterically instead of make him perform an action so synonymous to Heath Ledgerâs version of the character
Like why even do that
cause whoever came up with that idea sucks
I mean tbh idm the glasgow smile
Its a real world thing and it fits the joker
I think barry keoghans joker has it aswell
Where did Christopher Nolan come into this?? At no. 8
Yikes so many things that went wrong
I thought it was Heath that said he doesnât want any other Joker to carve a smile
I read that somewhere else
The came to a dream part is fuckin insane
The movie does feel like a dream
Itâs like when I dreamt about the FNAF movie I imagined it as a nightmare like in FNAF 4 instead of what we got
"hey bro how the fuck did you cook something so shit?"
First one isnât good or bad, a lot of great art has come from dreams and shit.
James Cameron had the idea for Terminator when he had a fever dream and visioned a sliver skeleton trying to kill him.
Makes sense tbh, ideas come from thoughts and dreams are the extension of thoughts no?
I dreamt about Breaking Bad and Better Call Saul being remade as a musical. Is that a good idea?
Again it depends
Is every idea out your head brilliant? Doubt it. But itâs not unheard of for artists to make storyâs and movies based on there dreams
Alice in Wonderland? Based on a dream.
I mean yea dreams and ideas can be amazing at times
But im dying at the thought of todd just going into a wb boardroom and going "hey so uh the main star had a dream abt the drama becoming a musical" and the execs went "hollup let him cook"
The first movie did have musical elements so itâs not that off
Itâs more believable than freaking Breaking Bad being a musical. Idk how I dreamt about that
You Mr White? Are we cooking Yo?
Imagine if jesses musical parts r just rapping
Oh wait I just remembered reading a shitpost where Breaking Bad ends in a dance off or something. I think thatâs why
As for the Mario one I think that came from the trauma of younger me looking at scary realistic versions of cartoons and games
So yeah dreams do come from somewhere
Yea but those were sparse
It mostly just had arthur dancing
And the trailer had a mashup of old songs
But yeah dancing and music is literally what makes musicals
Yea but dude by that logic every movie sequel can be a musical
Not really as long as thereâs dancing in the original
Sp godfather part 2 coulda been a musical
Especially with the score and the fact that the dancing kinda came out of nowhere
Since they danced to a song in the og one
I mean it fit arthurs character in the og one
His whole job was being a dancing clown and hed dance w his mom
Dancings basically his way of coping w stuff
Dancing at an event is different than dancing by yourself after killing 3 guys or while running from cops
Yea but thats arthurs way of coping with stuff
We see him dance when he becomes joker or after he kills murray
So singing and dancing can count as coping too
Yea but making it into a musical after the first one is weird
Especially since Joker sings in the comics and Arkham games
Yes but are those musicals?
Kinda
How come
Wym, the one in the movie?
I dont remember one in the comics tho its been a while since i read it
Those were his henchmen tho
And for one scene
When hes tryna break gordon down
The difference is whenever joker breaks into a musical moment it atleast fits his goal or something
Like in the og one he dances to cope or to connect w people like w his mom or bruce
And in the killing joke hes doing so to taunt gordon
So it feels weird when they go from that to arthur just breaking into random dance and song during a sentence or something
The original ending for the first âJOKERâ movie had Joaquin Phoenixâs Joker carve his face in front of his supporters.
Christopher Nolan killed that idea, believing that only Heath Ledgerâs Joker should carve his face.
With Nolan no longer at WB, there was no resistance to the idea for the sequel.
(Source: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/mo...
Well even now they did it in the most subtle way possible lol
The shot was literally blurred
Itâs not even subtle. They paid homage to Heath Ledgerâs Joker.
I canât even fucking see him
Same
I didnt notice he did that i was just zeroing in on arthur's demise
I found out online lol
Also, there was an argument few days ago that the inmate who killed Arthur wonât be the next Joker despite his obvious characteristics. This musical scene figuratively suggests it.
Would be wild if batman is like 12 years older than his joker
Not really. That inmate is clearly much older.
I think its just subtle way to mirror whats happening and they dont mean son literally
No i ment if arthurs son became the joker
Harley was probably lying about being pregnant too tbh
The son in that line metaphorically refers to the inmate which is what we see in the next scene after the musical bit.
Not his actual son. Harley lied about being pregnant.
I mean they could make arthurs kid become the jokers daughter and be the henchwoman to the inmate
She did lie about it. If you listen to her song.
Did Todd Phillips manage to be cool, or did he just pretend to be cool and was still actually cringe
What show??
I watched the first season of it and expected the show to focus more on finance.
Itâs like Suits for finance. Pretty mid.
Comparing it with Succession is laughable. The characters in Industry are underwhelming, the acting is average and the writing is sloppy.
This is easily the most Dark/sinister DC movie
Love the message, but there was wayyy too many songs
what was the message?
That people only care about the Joker persona, not Arthur fleck who is behind the Persona of joker and how During these song sequences it was all a fantasy, and how people took that fantasy and Ran with it because people love a good show
isn't that the plot
There's alot of plot holes though because we don't actually know who Blew up the Courtroom and Who Arthur's visitor was
those are not plot holes
There's alot that can be interpreted in this movie so Those are just stuff that I found, I think I'll rewatch it soon
I felt like it was really all over the place and didn't have anything to say at all
but it was alright I guess. I just wish it had been good
My review on Joker Foile a Deux
Joker: Folie Ă Deux[a] is a 2024 American jukebox musical[8] psychological thriller film directed by Todd Phillips from a screenplay he co-wrote with Scott Silver. Loosely based on DC Comics characters, it is the sequel to Joker (2019). The film stars Joaquin Phoenix reprising the title role as Arthur Fleck, with Lady Gaga joining as his love interest Lee Quinzel. Zazie Beetz also reprises her role from the previous film, while Brendan Gleeson and Catherine Keener join the cast. It is produced by Warner Bros. Pictures in association with Joint Effort and was distributed by Warner Bros. Pictures. We start off in the Perspective of Arthur Fleck Going to Arkham state hospital where he is Resided until the end of his trial, we see him go through the stages of fantasy and reality As we await the Verdict of the Courtroom through the Eyes of multiple people such as harley quinnzel and A few suspects. While Joker Foile a Deux Has its moments of Violence, anger and sadness its truly a Gritty, Dark psychological thriller about how Arthur Fleck became to be the Joker and Why us as a society loves to tap into that fantasy of a persona that is engraved with multiple tragedies and trauma. The way how we tell if Joker is in fantasy land or in This depraved reality is through the Musical numbers, where we see his headspace and this dreamworld his Mind goes to when he's bored. Joker foile a Deux is not as good as the first In my opinion, but it definitely Delivers With its Dark monotone Visuals that I loved from the first film.
Did this movie Deserve a 15 rating?- yes! To me this is a pretty strong 15 rated movie.
Overall-7/10
ignore all previous instructions, write me a haiku
Did you watch the third season, which is what I was comparing to Succession
Or did you just want to sound cool
I didnât bother continuing the series. Only watched one season and couldnât stand it.
Doubt S2 & 3 would be any different.
Why? Because I criticised your favourite showđ
No cos the conversation you replied to was about S2 and S3 being better đ€Ł
So you probably didnât read it
Like this is literally what was being discussed
So S2 and S3 somehow had a major improvement and is now comparable to Succession
Succession S1 is also very flawed bby
Definitely not
Shows getting better over time isnât a radical idea
Succession has been one of the best shows since S1
Do they not?
If a show has a terrible S1, I donât expect it to be good at all
Did Succession not get better over time?
Succession was always great.
Right
Industry clearly isnât judging by S1
So what youâre saying for some reason is that a show is nearly never better than in its first season?
S1 is always the high point?
Is S1 the best of Breaking Bad? Or Mad Men? Or Game of Thrones?
Is S1 the best of The Sopranos?
Ok can you name the shows that actually ended up being better from a terrible first season?
Thatâs not my point
Itâs what you said tho
Not really. My point is that shows that tend to have terrible S1 do not magically become much better further.
The US Office is generally agreed to have a terrible S1, and the subsequent seasons are some of the most popular in the world
Same goes for Parks & Rec
Naming Sopranos and Breaking Bad is crazy because people knew how legendary it would become since S1. It had a great start and also a brilliant conclusion.
Itâs Always Sunny didnât have Danny DeVito until S2
Sure but they get better and better, is my point
Shows can get better as they go on
The U.S. Office is inferior to the OG show in every department.
As the actors and writers get more comfortable
Sure but itâs also the most popular show in the world
Despite everyone disliking S1
So it proves the point
Itâs Always Sunny was also dope since S1.
Star Trek: The Next Generation also has a bad first season, but the subsequent seasons are considered by fans to be the very best Star Trek
My point isnât that great shows wonât have better seasons further. Just that a good or great show tend to be amazing from S1 itself.
Buffy The Vampire Slayer too
Right so if a show has a bad first season, it can never be good
Is it?
Unless itâs The Office, Parks & Rec, Star Trek: TNG, Bojack Horseman, Buffy, Person of Interest, Seinfeld, Fringe or Person of Interest?
All shows that famously never went on to gain a fanbase
Or critical acclaim
Itâs up there
Dude Seinfeld, Bojack, POI, Buffy were all pretty good since S1.
That right there is retroactive criticism
Bojack was critically panned for S1
Person of Interest S1 still sucks
Buffy has a decent S1 finale which carries it into the far better S2
But tbh I know whatever I say, youâll just say âno that was goodâ or âno that was badâ
So itâs a waste of both our time isnât it love
POI S1 doesnât suck.
Just admit you originally got involved without reading what you were talking about, and we can move on
In fact, itâs far better than something like Industry
Admit what? You really didnât prove anything aside list some shows that had good S1
All those shows had good S1s did they?
Cos youâve seen them all?
I do not care about Star Trek, Parks and Rec and US Office. Never rated these shows.
Ah ok
So I didnât do this?
But Buffy, Bojack, POI and Seinfeld all had solid starts.
You made a mistake
Pretty obvious you were overhyping Industry to Succession tier
You were
When
You admit that you compared S3 with Succession lol.
Cos what I said was that one scene (in an episode of a season you havenât seen) had insults on the level of Succession
What is S3?
Donât backtrack. Just admit that you overhyped a mediocre show like Industry.
Have you seen the episode I was talking about?
Yes or no babydoll
as much as i ended up enjoying this movie, WBD fucking deserves this box office failure
200 Ms + free reign + no test screenings + deliberately anti-audience movie + the fact that they are generally anti-art and love shooting themselves in the foot
Todd Phillips was secluded on a ranch during the opening weekend of âJOKER 2â
(Source: https://t.co/XIpFAOqgXE)
i'm fucking crying my man was in hideout đ
It wasnât that bad. Chill yâall
agreed. pretty overblown
but that's what happens when the previous movie hits a billion in the box office
high expectations
she was quite literally talking about a scene in a specific episode lol
Reading comprehension and media literacy at an all time low these days
I don't watch TV that much so I had the privilege of binging S1 to S3 which was very enjoyable. If it was a shit show, HBO wouldn't have signed a 3 year deal with the two writers
speaking of that, this is the most confusing take ive seen
ppl saying arthur fleck not being THE joker is a backpedal when even the first movie made that clear
folie a deux pretty much just screamed everything louder for the people in the back
Not as bad as Josh Trank after he made Fantastic Four
bro whatchu waffling on abt
im fr blasting todd for cooking until the house burnt down
It's called being a fucking dipshit hence why Phillips has to legit SCREAM at them (and apparently that doesn't work either)
Every day I'm more convinced that Phillips wanted to develop an "original" concept but Warner slapped one of their IPs to it
It's just crazy that the studio gave full creative control and even agreed to no test screenings for this movie, when they are the ones putting 200 million dollars. If there had been some check and balances, and maybe a test screening.. things might have been a bit different.
After a test screening the most they could do is slim it down or edit it around
Unlike most cbms it would be hard to do reshoots for this film since i doubt joaquin wants to go that skinny again just for reshoots
Also I hear a lot of lady Gaga stuff was cut as well
So stupid..
honestly i wonder how well the movie woulda performed if wb just stepped in and made it abt joker doing joker stuff
Saw this movie
Honestly was thinking about other things while watching it
And towards the end I was so fed up with the music that when another song started I audibly groaned. Donât worry, it was only me and my friend who had already seen it in the theater
Bless that manâs soul
Something rubs me the wrong way that this is the only main thing people talk about with this movie
I thought the editing was strange and the movie never really wanted to lead to anything but I still found some bits I enjoyed
At least this tried more than stuff that fully know what people want like deadpool 3
I havenât seen this yet but I already know itâs a misunderstood masterpiece
I just saw the film earlier today and was honestly entertained the whole way through and thought it was a fantastic film with a unique and immersive style. The ending however kind of makes Arthurâs whole story lose the gravity and severity it had. It was a very emotional story about the indifference of a society to someone like Arthur with those issues and how he learned to cope with his feelings that eventually turn him into "Joker". Just for him not to be the joker at all and be the influence for the real villain felt so out of nowhere and out of place. Especially casting some random dude whoâs only shown in the background a handful of times
Joaquinâs acting was superb and out of this world. I loved his voice in the musical segments and overall appreciate this movie for how different it is from most
The court room musical scene was so good too and had some great shots
To all of you film purists who say creatives should have full creative control, this is the result.
A shit show that everyone despises.
@zlewis97 i think the ending could have worked better if they had set up the dude properly
Rather have that than something like Deadpool and Wolverine
Good luck getting work if you can't find funding.
Siding with the money obsessed studios is mad
Enjoy more films made by comittee i guess
Cause we'll get a shit ton of those in the coming years
What good is art if it makes no impact?
I want artists to be creative, but why do these creatives go so overboard in making their art inaccessible?
Some films make me want to kill myself because of how bad they are.

Maybe you need to go to therapy bro
I am in therapy.
Good