#šŗThe Last of Us (2023)
1 messages Ā· Page 7 of 1
it will indeed be a revenge plot, everything depends on HOW they will play the revenge plot
Maybe about how they survive for a few years
i'll be a good adult woman and, strong of my previous experiences, stand very far from season 2
until enough hype and hate has softened lol
Iāve not played the 2nd game but I know what happens
you should def play the game, it's a very good game with a weak plot
but the game does everything it can to make you live the plot
Weak plot is an instant turn off for me in a game
well it's weak if you don't get attached to it
but the game really tries out everything
and it has to be praised for that, i almost forgot to see the nonsense of it all
Yeah I guess
Tbf they have the benefit of hindsight now, both for TLOU2 and the first season of the show
They know what was poorly received and can alter it accordingly (besides THAT big thing probably)
Also I can bet rn tha S2 and 3 will have a lot more infected than the first
i'll repeat that without that bad thing the plot has exactly 0 sense and might aswell call it "The last of us part II: what if"
but yes, technically they can alter stuff poorly received, although it's a lot if you account for the lack of structure in the whole plot
Hope they change nothing because TLOU 2 kino š
Finished ep9 and wow what a great ep
Overall, a really good show with some great performances
I'm not the biggest fan of the second game but I wouldn't exactly say that it makes ZERO sense. The story kinda makes sense but the realism aspect is like a switch that a 5 year old is playing with and flicking it on and off for fun.
lol the switch thing is like the best concept i've ever seen of explaining it
although that instead of a 5 years old i would write in "lazy writers"
"bro this thing makes exactly zero sense"
"who cares? You need SUSPENSION OF DISBELIEF"
shocked faces
can't wait for them to insert aliens just to trigger people
fucking aliens shooting beam lasers on the earth cleansing the world from infected and humans
leaving only animals
oh and the aliens are genderfluid pansexual beings
having the most dramatic queer plots
with the captain being a fan of Twilight
best plot ever
Yeah thats what I mean, thats the only thing they cant really change
This is how you make an adapation
Of a video game.
Netflix needs to take fucking notes right now.
the only notes netflix takes it's about how much revenue they drop if they do that fishy thing in that particular way
???
Nah after the Resident Evil show.
They need to take notes.
they care exactly 0 about quality nowadays, it's just about shoveling the highest number of titles in their catalogue so that you subscribe
and don't share your password
Oh my bad, I see what you're saying now.
Yeah lol, it's sad to see. They we're the first to start this shit and now there getting left behind.
left behind, ahah, i got the pun (no pun i know, but it was funny)
yeah well i mean, i'm not even super sure they started this
i'm pretty sure there was another service before netflix
like a somewhat famous one
True.
they just happened to resist amidst the chaos
and are now suiciding 'cause of... greediness probs, or just being incompetent
(or both)
oh, hulu
the first one was hulu
Oh really?
I didn't know that.
I remeber when I was small I used to see there logo on those like, Rent a movie vending machines.
Oh you're from Italy!
That's cool.
yeh
i think (not sure) that apple tv and netflix were the first to expand into europe
Yeah I think that's accurate.
this summer it will be sadly hot, winter had very little snow and rain due to climate crisis
for now it's starting to become spring and it's the best weather all around i'll have for the next 12 months i'm sure lol
where you going? I hope it's not venice
in summer that will feel like being in a boiling pot with a lot of mosquitos inside
"MAH MUSHROOM ZOMBIE GAME"
Like how hot?
The flashbacks wouldn't work if they weren't where they were at the start of the story
eh, guess some deity has to spare us from very hot, last time it rained this little eventually the rain happened near summer and yet we had 40°C in many cities
if you're going in south italy i hope you're gonna get yourself wet like 23 hours out of 24
.104 DEGRESS?!
i very much disagree
JESUS CHRIST
104 is nothing
i lived 10 years between palermo and catania, in sicily, and there were years with 44°C
and it was a tad bit too much lol
Can we talk part 2 spoilers here if they are marked as spoilers?
well it says "the last of us 2023" so technically yes
perhaps mark them as spoilers tho?
Alright š
So who here has played the game?
describe "played"
Like, you've held a control, put the game in the consol.
Or at least watch a let's play.
well i did that for almost 3 hours and then watched the rest as let's play/cutscenes only
yeah and tlou2 has this stuff pretty significantly
Alot of the like themes of the human conditon are expressed in the game plays rogue feel.
Like the way the game portrays murder is spin chilling, People cry and beg for mercy.
Theres a heavy weight that comes with it.
I think that was well converted here.
But in a way that was effeitive for a show.
tbh with you at some point in tlou1 i was gun blazing 'cause the game was quite boring as a game
i was playing only for the scenes lol
I disagree.
I think part of the experience is the feeling you get when Joel breaks someones neck.
oh well yes ofc, it's just that the filler parts were too many and it felt like i was single handedly killing the little humanity left on the planet lol
perhaps aside the first hours of tlou1 the only moment i had true fun in playing it was during ellie's turn of killing peeps
The way he fights, almost like someone that is desperate trying to live, not an invincible gun slinging bad ass.
Yeah same.
throwing bricks against people was very satisfying
the worst part may be the mall part in the dlc
i was like "omg i've had enough" and switched to a let's play lol
infact anytime someone says "i should play tlou1 to enjoy the full experience" i just suggest a no commentary playthrough or the "movie" version on youtube
I disagree
I think part of it, is being the on holding the control, crawling throught the grass, aiming down the sights of the gun.
It gives you a certain type of emersion not seen in film.
It
yeeeeeah... but it also sucks a bit, especially the raft parts are such a boring thing to do
that i can't even BEGIN to think who thought it was a good idea
Eh, to each their own.
Part 2 spoilers ||The flashbacks are throughout Ellies journey because they are used to further explain why she's going on this path of revenge. Yes she's going after Abby because she killed Joel but it goes much deeper than that. The flashbacks reveal that she never really forgave Joel for both lying to her from the fireflies and also saving her from the fireflies. She tells Joel she would have wanted to die if it meant there'd be a cure. Their relationship is damaged and Abby took away her ability to fully heal it. I think that works much better than just starting off with flashbacks. Seeing Ellie and Joel be much more distant at the start is much more effective than having all answers immediately given to us. The final flashback with Joel shows they were finally able to start mending their relationship and that is cut short by his death. It explains why she didn't kill Abby. It wouldn't change anything. It won't bring him back. But she finally has a chance to forgive someone. ||
Even if you dislike the story I don't know how you'd disagree that this was the best way tell the story
In regards to the flashbacks
This comment definitely contains information that can be seen as spoilery, but it's not outright one so be warned. I'll mark the ones that are blatant.
or... they could've given the flashbacks as a playable part of the game right after (REDACTED) happens. It then would fuel the players' urge to now REALLY go for the route Ellie went beyond the surface level empathy we feel for this game, which comes directly from the very earned sympathy of the first. Neil wanted the ending to be miserableā sure, whatever. But he also wanted a very on-the-nose message other media has passed on with more elegance than ''flashback middle fight'' like it's Deus Ex Machina. There's a reason why stories with this dominant theme end the way they end, all the way back to Shakespeare. It's because you can't have it be miserable AND hopeful messaging at the same time. Doing so makes up for a story that can only end unsatisfyingly. The message comes from seeing bad things happen, and feeling the carthasis released by experiencing the consequences of those actions. What brought you here is exactly what you want to avoid, because this is how it ends. then the media shows you how it ends
||and yet, we still experience the misery, because we are playing as Ellie, and Ellie ain't got nothing left. The game stops you from going there, and seeing what happens when you push for those dark decisions. At the same time that it offers you the experience all the same, but now we have a forcefully fed flashback that tries to give reasoning for that lack of choice.||
||the game could simply have shown us that Ellie never forgave Joel, and then he was taken from her. She should've forgiven him, and now she will live it to regret it. That's one message. And then she should've gone for revenge, and lost everything else she had in her life. That's another message. You see, what Neil wants to say can be said still, he just didn't say it right, not in the right order, not with the right mindset. And it's a wonder he failed like that, when stories of this nature have been told again and again and again.||
||at the end of the day, TLOU2 doesn't have enough courage to let its main character do the wrong decisions, and let the audience judge her for it. It didn't have the courage to show us Ellie would never forgive, and that by seeing how she ends up alone, we should learn to do otherwise. For a game that tries to preach for the exercising of empathy and believing in the good we have inside ourselves, it didn't believe its own audience to have it.||
|| If Ellie realizes she finally has a chance to forgive someone before she even goes after Abby then the whole story makes no sense? I might be misunderstanding what you're trying to say.||
||She does do the wrong thing. The whole game she is doing the wrong thing. The game is quite in your face about how much violence and destruction she is causing. And she does lose everything. She comes back to the farm and Dina is gone. Tommy is dead. She's alone.||
And the game puts a LOT of faith in the audience. Too much even lol. You see how often people try to describe the game as just a "revenge bad" story
||the point would be being blinded by your rage, now that is poetic. To do something wrong because you weren't allowed to do something right. How true to life is that. The game could've given us the hints that this relationship can turn around, if Ellie pushes herself a little more towards forgiveness. For once the flashbacks shouldn't give that blatant answer, human beings are smart enough to pick up clues. To push a good message doesn't mean to push your character to make a good choice. And Ellie ultimately makes one at the end, forcefully via flashback and cutscenes not allowing you to kill Abby. Yet her good choice at this point breeds nothing but dissatisfaction, to the viewer, and to herself. Kill or not kill, she's lost everything. This is a revenge story, it's the dominant theme (other people in this channel have claimed I don't have enough intelligence to understand there are sub-themes underneath it, but I do.) stories of this nature have had a history of being about the first-hand experience of seeing cruel consequences to cruel actions. The good message comes from seeing what happens if you don't make the right choices, the ending at its core is self-defeating. It's like Neil knew exactly how revenge stories are supposed to end, but he ducked at the last moment to make sure the message came across. Again, demonstrating the zero trust he had in his audience having a sense of moral inside them. To know what is the right thing, and see the character do the wrong thing, is the whole thesis of revenge stories. Of stories about wrong-doings. TLOU2 isn't one, not entirely. It plays itself like one, but at the end it ultimately undermines its own message by taking away the audience's contribution to it. Force feeding one interpretation like you don't have what it takes to conclude that where Ellie ends at isn't a good place.||
||we know she should forgive, but to force us to forgive by forcing her to forgive, that isn't how truly great stories are made. That isn't how the greatest pieces of literature on revenge have had it, they wouldn't be the greatest if they did. Hard stories end up in a harsh way, because they are stories of bad people. And we know that, that's how we learn how to not be them. That is how stories for grownups are told, with a lot of understanding and respect for them and their own life experiences learning what isn't and what is the terrible choice to make.||
I'm not the first and I won't be the last to repeat, that this story is repetitive. People have consumed stories with these exact concepts for ages, misunderstanding is not the problem.
||She is blinding by rage. The whole game she is. Up until the very end. I don't understand what you mean by unsatisfaction. She finally realized what she was doing wasn't going to change anything. She never shows regret from not killing Abby. Boiling the whole game down to "revenge bad" isn't a good thing even if it is the dominant theme. Sub themes are just as important as the main theme. You wouldn't have this story without the sub themes. And like I said, she does make the wrong choices. She makes many wrong choices. We see the consequences of those wrong choices. If she chooses not to forgive then we have no character arc. The Ellie we have at the start of the game would be the same Ellie at the end. There would be no growth and would make her character so much more uninteresting. I don't understand why you think a character making only bad decisions and never growing is the "grownup" way of telling stories?||
Wall of texts
So many spoilers for TLOU 2, one click and everything is known lol
Assuming you guys are spoiling
Yes
I said above it was spoilers for part 2 but probably should have said it again since it's a little bit up mb
Nah it fine
Actually they spoil less than what you think lol
Anyhow, the discussion on tlou2 is already going on, can't wait to see homophobes and out of place peeps join it š
||I don't understand, how you don't understand that great stories are not told only in the basis of forward character growth. Firstly you can go around the internet all day long to see the feedback of dissatisfaction the game gives the player. I'll link one right below. Secondly, great stories about revenge are borne from the anguish you suffer from seeing a character go for wrong choices all the way through. It's a negative character arc. The term ''show don't tell'' isn't about showing, not telling. It's about letting the viewer come in and give meaning to what you show them. By making the last choice be the only right one Ellie makes, even when it doesn't make any sense because she had that memory this entire ''adventure''ā memories aren't suddenly unlocked in your mind at a crucial momentā you are just shoving into your viewer's mouth what is the interpretation of your work. And you are objectively undermining your negative character arc. This story was not built around Ellie slowly growing out of her pain, it's a story built around hunting someone down, and leaving a body count behind you. Every step of the way Ellie takes the wrong decisions, you yourself admitted it. This is objectively following the structure of a negative arc up until the ending. Which again preaches the audience to no end. And to no greater effect, either.||
perhaps making the discussion long-winded will shush them away
disclaimer, all of it is spoilers spoilers spoilers
do not click, spoilers.
||I said the character growth is what makes her character interesting? I never said you can't have a character only have forward character growth. She would have no character growth if she every choice she made was out of rage and led to violence and hurt everyone around her. I misunderstood what you said about unsatisfaction earlier. I thought you were referring to Ellie. Mb. Of course she has that memory the whole time, but it's not what she's focused on. She's focused on how she never got to fully forgive Joel. It wasn't until that final moment when she saw Abby with Lev and could finally connect everything. Again, I think you're boiling everything down to "revenge bad" which isn't entirely fair when there's so much more to it||
||I don't get what they're trying to say. The ending isn't supposed to make you feel great and happy. It's a tragic ending. "It's so damn sad." I mean yeah that's the point? You feel Ellies pain.||
Also that subreddit is horrible. What an awful community
||Well, ''interesting'' is a very subjective thing. A story that can be interesting to you can be uninteresting to me. What isn't so subjective on the other hand, are patterns and cohesiveness. It's fine if Neil wanted to do a non-conventional character arc and a non-conventional story. But then he shouldn't have structured it exactly like a conventional negative character arc, and a conventional revenge story. The very reason why I keep saying how revenge stories go, is because they at this point are one very specific genre in and of itself, and all stories which fall into it go through a very specific pattern, also. Negative character arcs are exactly build upon worse and worse decisions, that is what they are, and they are objectively arcs too. They just go downward, and I think you will have a hard case to build arguing against the fact that Ellie is a better person at the very start of the game, than she is at the very end, with everyone she's killed including dogs. On themes, storytelling isn't very different from a stack of dominos making up one cohesive image, and if you drop a big important domino, the rest will fall behind. Destroying the once cohesive image they formed. A dominant theme is exactly that, dominant. It's what the story focuses on at the beginning by setting it up, and what it focuses at the end, by concluding the thematic. Godfather would not be Godfather without Mike's negative arc, even if it is also a story about family, loyalty, power, justice. From hero to villain is the dominant way through which we see the story unfold, it is how it starts, and it is how it ends. It's what we're left with at the end.||
I don't care what is the subreddit's state, I'm just showcasing an individual's dissatisfaction with the product.
||Yes it is subjective. Pretty much this entire discussion is subjective. You keep saying "this is how revenge stories typically are told" and act like that's the only way to do it. Any type of subversion is bad writing. I just can't agree with that. This is subjective from both of us. I never said she was a good person at the end. I said wrong decision after wrong decision all because she was unable get past the anger she had, she was finally able to stop and see what she was doing and the consequences so far and the future consequences if she never stopped. ||
I'm not saying stories should be told that way, I'm saying that breaking a pattern and making it incoherent, taking subtext and stripping it out to explain to your audience what it means, and ducking at the very end so you can make an X pattern into a Y pattern, is bad storytelling.
every art has basic rules, and storytelling has basic rules of drama. You can break them in a way that is cohesive to what you're telling, and why you're telling it. Or you can break them so you can overexplain what was already explained. Taking away the contribution between viewer and creator from your work, which once mostly was championed on it.
When a discussion surrounding TLOU2 is based around you giving more value to sub thematic, like that excuses how the main thesis is told with the finesse of a children's book and the coherency of Deus Ex Machina, then I don't think the problem is people ignoring sub themes.
What's incoherent about the story? I don't get what you mean by taking subtext out and explaining to the audience. Just because what happens isn't up to interpretation, doesn't mean there's no engagement for the audience. ||Half way through the game challenges you to play as a character that killed a character that you have grown attached to. The game isn't trying to get you to fill in the blanks for anything. It want to test your ability to see the other side of the story. Exactly what Ellie has to do at the end.||
''the other side of the story'', let me correct you. The right side of the story.
||as abby doesn't kill people with names, she helps dogs, and pretty much has a way better relationship with everybody in her life than Ellie does.||
if I did this whole brick wall of text talking about interpretation on this type of storytelling, about negative character arcs, giving examples of such, and you still don't get it. Then I think truly someone else is boiling criticisms down to ''X thing bad.''
this whole damn thing is about subtext, dude.
Though I'm certain that you already understood it, you just don't agree with it. Again the thing that I always say. It's not that you can't see how else this story could've been told, you just don't agree with the other options.
||Doesn't kill people with names? She kills Joel right at the start. She kills someone you're more attached to than anyone lol||
and then the game gives her a whole reason to
I disagree with other options because I think they're inferior ways of telling the story. You disagree with the option how the story was already told. There's nothing different.
Everything we're saying is subjective. Can't act like there's an objectively better way to tell this story
||nothing that abby does is written to put the player against her, on the contrary, everything is written to be extra positive for her side of the story. TLOU2's way of equaling our sympathy for Abby is to bring Ellie down, and push Abby up. Look guys Ellie kills everyone with names! they scream their names! she kills dogs! (which the game forces you to) Ellie treats everyone like shit, many people question how she even has a girlfriend that is so nice to her, when she is so extremely blunt with her communication. But of course, Abby is different, she even had a loving relationship with her dad. Look at that||
||It pushes Abby up because she starts at 0. She's still not a good person. She's blinded by rage just like Ellie is. The game wants to put each other on the same level. If it doesn't push Abby up then you just leave thinking "oh Abby is just a piece of shit" and you have 0 sympathy for her.||
Again, failing to understand that in storytelling there are macro and micro reactions to your work, and creators fine tune their stories so that the reaction they expect will be falling into the macro side of the whole thing. One of them being ''people don't like stories that infantilize their intellectual for the sake of middle school messaging.'' Another thing you can spend the whole day looking around for people using the same phrases: ''this is repetitive'' ''I've seen this before, I know what the message is'' ''this is such a forcefully told conclusion.''
yes because stories haven't time and time again achieved the same effect of empathy by still making their characters completely sickos
Joker just came out?
people still love Walter White?
You achieve empathy by showing more than one facet of a character, even if the other side is completely bad. Not by making a caricature of a good person and handling it to us. ''Here it is, now remove your dislike of them!''
it's fabricated empathy, so much for the testing. There is no testing, there is very little choice.
||to the point if you hate Abby, your hate isn't even justified. She killed the dude who killed her father, it's the only thing there is to truly hate about her. And that is made sure to be given a good, sound reasoning to happen. So really there is no other traits that can be disliked here. She beats Ellie up? oh well, Ellie kills other people she likes too. It all reverts to an undeniable feeling of ''there's no real reason to feel negative about this girl.''||
TLOU2 spoilers above
||Not comparable? Get to the final season and have a character you've seen for 5 minutes kill Walter off and make him the new main character until the last episode.||
Very much comparable, these characters off people left and right for the same ''sound reasons'' we are given in the game.
yet they don't have a need to fabricate any empathy by artificially making them a good person
||You've spent the last what 12 hours(?) of the game not knowing this. It's testing you after having solidified your opinion that Abby isn't good. To make it even harder, iirc, the game switches perspectives right after she kills one of Ellies friends||
||and? Is ''beating Ellie up'' the sole reason why now you're perpetually angry with this girl the game made you play with during a comically positive campaign for such a dark narrative? None of the reasons why people hate Abby come across as reasonable, because there are none to be grasped here. She kills the favorite character for her own revenge of what he did, and then she plays with dogs and visits children spaces and talks nicely to her loved ones for the next 6 hours. It's blatantly playing for her side. The game could hardly make her less of a hero besides her one body count with Joel.||
||You're angry at Abby up until that point because she's the villain of the story. Again, you know essentially nothing about Abby until the switch perspectives. The game has to play to her side because you've spent the last 12 hours against her and only told you that she is bad. If it just turned out she was a piece of shit then you would never sympathize with her.||
except again, narratives where you sympathize with the douchebag have been done time and time again
you yourself admits how the game doesn't trust the audience to have any empathy left in them
But there's no reason to at that point. You've seen her for 30 minutes out of 12 hours? You are never given a reason to
||again, this game is incapable of letting you conclude what you have to conclude, without forcefully feeding it all through an artificially fabricated lens. In those 12 hours there was more than enough time to show a human being acting like a human being, what we see is a hero acting like a hero. And a villain (Ellie) acting like a villain. None of her kills needed to be the way they were, but giving name to random npcs you kill and making you be an absolute beast that treats everyone around you poorly? This is a black and white story, and the epiphany at the last moment straddles the line of fairy tale ''goodness.''||
||making Ellie threaten a kid just so Abby could fight her, Abby which at this point is too good of a person to even want the fight to continue. Incredible.||
||In those 12 hours we know nothing about Abby? I really don't get what you're saying. There's 0 reason anyone would feel sympathy for Abby prior to the perspective change. Abby isn't portrayed as some saint either? She's spent the last 5(?) years of her life hunting down one person. Just like Ellie, she is also motivated by revenge.||
12 hours in the other perspective, to be factually correct those are 10-15 hours of campaign.
||Main story says 24 hours and the perspective change is about half way through. I'm just guessing the time. Could be off idk. doesn't change my point||
||How long do you play as Ellie in The Last Of Us 2?
You play as Ellie in The Last Of Us Part 2 for about 12-hours before switching over to Abby||
||Yeah so exactly what I've been saying?||
||again, 12 hours of Abby being artificially written as the good guy, and more 12 hours of Ellie destroying other people in the brutest of ways, and being a dull ''two words response'' type girlfriend. If we didn't know Ellie from the first game god knows if we would even like playing as her.||
||you're just arguing in bad faith by now. When you agree with the points I'm making surrounding the game's pandering to Abby. ''Because they needed to show she's not a piece of shit.'' Yeah, so they craft a caricature of a hero you can play as and force your empathy tingles to go off.||
||Prior to those 12 hours of playing as Abby, you are given 12 hours of being told she isn't good and the villain of the story. And don't act like Abby doesn't kill people in incredibly brutal ways too? ||
??????????
||I'm not arguing in bad faith?? What are you talking about? They don't "they craft a caricature of a hero"? I'm saying they can't have a character that is impossible to attach to. If she's a piece of shit then why would you ever feel sympathy for her? You can connect to characters like Joker and Walter White because you want to see them succeed. Even if they are terrible. You'd have no reason to feel that way for Abby if she was just a horrible killing machine with 0 empathy for others.||
||she doesn't need to be a piece of shiet, but a character that never has a moment where you leave her side of the story, meanwhile you have every right to leave Ellie's, is artificially pandering to one side. There are countless moments in BB and Joker where I'm actively not on his side anymore, but I never hate either character because I understand them. Nevertheless, I don't like their actions.||
in fact, episode 1 of Breaking Bad you already have Walter beating people up. He ain't a good grandpa. And how aggressive he is towards the bullies isn't a righteous move. Nobody considers that in real life, look at Will Smith.
all the story has to do, is give it a reason to understand those not so righteous moves, that is what breeds empathy towards the character.
"nobody" as in half of the country
I don't exactly what recall what said bullies were doing in the first episode of Breaking Bad, but I highly doubt it is comparable to Chris Rock's joke during his joke routine thing
you can go around the internet anywhere, people that go ''you insulted me, I'll beat you up in a fight'' are not the ones getting praised for their actions. You are just seen as someone who can retort with nothing but violence the moment your feelings are hurt by other people's insults of you. Very out of context, but MoistCritikal just made a video on one of those people, live moment of someone embarrassing themselves by threatening others of ''beating them up'' on social media.
In the first episode of BB, some kids were mocking Walt's son because he buys clothes with his parents still.
OK, what did Walt do again?
the answer is literally one scroll above of your own comment. Jesus christ
If I was Craig Mazin, Iād be jumping ship right about ⦠yesterday.
Last of Us 2 discourse is as toxic as TLJ discourse. There is no salvaging something with this horrible of an online discussion.
They can go in there and adapt it faithfully and people will be angry.
If they change things radically to appease fan complaints, people will be angry.
Itās a lose-lose situation.
Let Neil Druckmann handle it and the story can be adapted faithfully to his wishes. He can take the heat. Doesnāt matter anyway since thereās only two games.
Unless theyāre thinking about doing a Bill and Frank spin-off.

That would be fun.
idk WHY they was so much hate on the adorable giraffe thing
Apparently, people thought it was bad CGI when it was actually a real giraffe
Hilarious
I think Mazin is who HBO trusts, they would not let Druckmann alone, or else they would have to attach someone more prominent who has done work for HBO before and have him guide Druckmann. There's evidence that Druckmann would have already fucked up if he was alone, he wanted the first episode of the series to end without ever seeing Ellie, and with Joel throwing that kid in the fire.
Mazin has no reason to jump ship, he's calling Druckmann a genius left and right, wether it's in podcasts or interviews, for coming up with the TLOU story, and he knows all about the second game, controversy or not they're gonna do some huge numbers and I'm sure they'll find ways to keep people coming back via use of flashbacks or at least the need for a good closure and "justice", and even if it absolutely sucks or there's outrage, it's all directed at Druckmann eventually for me at least, Mazin is just a person that knows the TV medium well and he's trying to adapt the game, he's not responsible for the core decisions of the plot, the only thing he can do the way I see it is soften the blow.
I think people just compare it with the game, and in the game it was superior because there was a build up to it, you could see something huge and you didn't know what the crap it was, and then there was the reveal, Ellie's delight and the beautiful music that you could barely hear on the TV show. I personally liked it, but the experience is nowhere near as close as when you have the controller and you and Joel have the same question, what the heck is that thing, are we in danger?
well it was great in the show
The reason why last of us show was so good is because of both Mazin and Druckmann working together.. HBO would have never trusted druckmann alone
While Mazin had proven himself with Chernobyl.. making a game and a TV show is two different things
BIG TIME SPOILERS FOR THE SECOND GAME if you haven't played it. Regarding this whole doctor situation one thing that bothered me in ||Part II is that while Ellie goes through the process of finding out what Joel did in Part I and try to accept it and move on, Abby never realises the irrational and sudden thinking of her dad, and not only do we not see her oppose it or somehow stall his decision but she even encourage him by telling him she would do the exact same thing. I wish they touched upon that somehow, or even in Part III when it happens, I hope they find a new medical facility where they tell her that they can basically figure out what's going on with her without taking her life, proving that Abby's dad made some quick and ill-advised decisions. But I highly doubt that would help the overall narrative that has been built so far.||
At this point I trust Mazin fully, he has proven to me and Druckmann is still getting involved.. they are splitting part ii of the game into at least 2 seasons
I think it's a smart play splitting it to two, there's a lot of frustrating moments for the audience throughout the second storyline and it's better for all of them to not be in one season as they might cause a decrease in viewership. Also and more importantly in my opinion, gives them time to work on Part III and for Season 4 to come closer to the potential release of the game.
Like a tie-in.
The reason it probably looked so off for a lot of people is because of the environment
everything surrounding the giraffe was edited in post
The giraffe was also likely from different take than Bella and Pedro in many shots
there was definitely a lot of tricky compositing work.
the hardest thing when it comes to CG is lighting
getting it perfect is the most painstaking part of the process
I think one of the main things is you could tell it was green screen and that it was suspending the disbelief a little bit.
someone in the article pointed out that the game hints that the Fireflies didn't have to kill Ellie and that she may not actually be the first person they've tried to manufacture a cure with
is that actually in the game? cuz i dont remember that
not that it matters now since if it was, it definitely wasnt in the show
since that would make the decision less controversial and would make joel's act seem less damning
I haven't played the game.. so don't know
Nah, fuck em. If Craig abandons ship, it gives more power to the toxic base. Best to just stand your ground and deliver something. People act like the show's ratings will just tank if they adapt TLOU2 as if TLOU2 was this critical failure that made $0 - the only people who think that are ones who live in their echo chamber of hate. I'd say that a large bulk of the audience are people who haven't played the game and are just interested in participating in more of these stories, ignoring whatever drivel the anti-TLOU2 folks say.
I totally agree and after the reception last of us has received I think Mazin will continue working plus he has already said there may be some big changes in season 2.. after all this show isn't just for game fans
Wonder what plot point they did that made some people be this angry with the game
Anyways, cant wait to find out
There's 11 audio clips (I think) that you find in the game that point to the Fireflie's incompetence, explains what they were doing with the monkeys in the other lab and also I think it has some backstory on the main doctor but I don't know if they name him specifically, but yes these collectibles exist and they were there to create ambiguity.
They won't tank but ||Pedro Pascal is a draw and Joel's death is permanent. I don't believe that this will have no impact in the viewership or how the show is perceived. The good thing is there's always the chase for revenge that might keep viewers going.|| [Spoilers for Last of Us Part II]
Nah
Oh shit you're right! Great point. 
Well, ||there definitely may be some impact but I think unlike in the game Joel won't be killed early in second season but perhaps in season 2 finale and like GoT killings, people will be angry but they will come back || spoilers from LoU ii game
I know it's a great point. I said it. š
I think that's too much of a time stretch but could work, I dunno.
In Mazin I trust, let's see what they will do
Season 2 I think is at least 2 years away
The sooner people get over TLOU2, the quicker we can realize that perhaps Mazin and Druckmann can produce something that'll make everyone happy. It seems like they are all willing to make concessions to make a solid adaptation.
If people can forgive Mazin for being the writer for Superhero Movie and Epic Movie Scary Movie 4, I'm sure Druckmann can earn his weird redemption with angry gamers through this adaptation.
What people? Casual fans don't know shit about TLOU2 and they're just waiting for Season 2. Disgruntled gamers is a very small percentage of the HBO audience, they legit don't matter.
Ease up on the defenses a little.
Don't get aggressive with me. Take it on your camera in the SUV.
I'm hoping that those angry gamers can finally lay down their bones they have picked with the franchise with this adaptation, whether or not their viewership matters. It gets tiresome seeing people beat the same drum years after release.
Let's say it happens, how will you know? Will they release a statement or something? And even if they do how will they affect you and your enjoyment of the show?
? lol
Chill out, brother
I'm not personally attacking you so I don't know why you're getting aggressive over this.
I'm just saying, they're not involved in the production. Also I'm not aggressive I'm just asking questions.
You're just asking very oddly defensive questions, as if I'm personally making them about you. Just ease up a little.
I know they're not involved in the production, don't be obtuse.
I'd personally just like to see those folks get an adaptation they can enjoy. Sucks seeing toxicity.
They might shoot everything back to back, although it might not make sense logistically.
It would sense to shoot it back-to-back, if it means they can save on costs.
It's obvious that they don't like the game's story any kind of adaptation would never satisfy them.
Okay, brother
You're welcome to bypass everything I'm saying. It's your right to do so
lol
Anyways, this is getting rather silly lol
whispers scary movie
other whispers join the hangover part II
Chernobyl š
The thing about being a screenwriter is that despite the fact those films weren't good, they were critically successful and Mazin made a career out of writing whatever producers wanted him to write, regardless of quality.
If a producer looked at his drafts and went, 'Yep we'll roll with it' it means that Mazin did his job. I don't think the producers of Scary Movie would've taken well to a horror-parody written like Chernobyl.
i hope he got possessed by the Good Spirit of Screenwriting
and stopped with the trash for good
but let me doubt
He's probably responsible for the skeleton of the tvshow's script
Given the new interviews where he says how much he had to work on-set for the entirety of the series
I mean if his scripts are being accepted by producers, he's a good screenwriter.
well yes but, i tend not to trust producers that produce scary movie
or the hangover...
Then that's not really his fault lol
Yeah I wasn't willing to hedge any bets that two sequels to a one-trick pony comedy were going to be good.
They were just repeats.
if they were repeats they would be entertaining atleast
He created and wrote Chernobyl, which was a critically acclaimed series. It seems he finally got to write the things he wanted to write.
but part 2 is cringeworthy moviemaking
Eh, agree to disagree. Doesn't bother me any haha
I'd blame Todd Phillips then because he produced and directed them lol
jesus christ someone stop phillips from doing anything, just let him focus on other hobbies
football, golf, rugby
kickboxing so that i can root for whoever is punching him
it's a miracle joker came out like this
and not like a somewhat tragic comedy
anyhow, i'll wait a lot before watching tlou2, i'm happy with the adaptation of the first
now please do an adaptation of deathloop š« that deserves so much
These movies are also on their way to be a decade old now, just like Todd Phillips, I don't really believe their previous works are all that good, not in comparison to the new stuffā whether by studio interference or their own personal workflow. I believe their recent stuff is good mostly on the basis that they've gained experience along the way. And that goes for them becoming stronger filmmakers/writers and being able to not break in half at studios demands, working under pressure is in and of itself a skill too.
looks at war dogs yeeeah... well, who knows.
growing old may make them suddenly adults, you never know
Well I come from my own visual arts background, and for us you first have to do a 130 bad paintings for the first half-good one to come out. Seeing the history of those two creators is a very non-abnormal journey in my perspective.
Making mistakes is often times the best way to learn
And I think Todd and Mazin learned pretty well-- so far.
imho that's a bit too deep, it looks more like mazin just does better writing for TV, which is fair
and phillips... just became bored of doing pure shit
both things are very common, but still i'm pretty sure your previous experience may induce you into weird stuff, that's why i'm not even bothering watching borderlands 'cause i already know some wicked crap is coming out of that
I don't know, for TV you still have to think of episodes in the same 3rd act structure you would in movies, it's a more micro management than a 2 hour movie, but let's be honest tv has become 50 to 1 hour films at this point.
yeah they're just very long movies divided into episodes lol
still, tv has perhaps less pressure for the writers than a movie, because you can actually "fix" stuff during filming
Same for Chernobyl, you watch one episode and it already feels like you've been presented a whole movie worth of content
Depending on the filmmaker and studio, they can do that too, it just most of the time won't work lol
it's not like "ok the script is this, it got accepted, it's done" and then you do perhaps small changes and adapt to the actors (very rare nowadays to do this, aswell), you actually change stuff drastically sometimes
Usually, scripts half written on-set are not very great
i'm pretty sure the whole bill and frank episode came out of nowhere
it was like "well this is some weird shit to adapt, let me see if i can output something better"
bam, sundance film script lol
Maybe, maybe not. The flashback in the finale according to Mazin was something Neil told him when they first started to talk about the series in pre production, and it took all the way through here for them to tell it
Wouldn't be too far fetched if episode 3 was also background Neil told him, and he decided to drastically expand on it
Which is funny, cause trying to recover a car battery from a school full of infected would' ve been massively cool and also would be exactly what this show needed cause in the end they didn't have quite as many infected interactions as they wanted.
yeah but bill backstory sucked badly, fun gameplay part, weak story part
The danger of the infected and the humans was part of the glue that brought Joel and Ellie together.
especially the whole frank situation is like "wtf?"
Well, it was sad as shit, true.
Also remember that the letter is completely optional, some people might never find it or know what exactly was up between Bill and Frank?
yeah and that makes it (imho, but very not imho) 100x worse
you are left wondering "what the actual fuck just happened here"
Yeah, and the average gamer would read maybe half or less of the collectibles he finds, think of all the stories from the games (TLOU or not) that are being left behind.
LEFT BEHIND AHAH, yeah, well
that's a problem i have with many games
like, all those quests in elder scrolls?
i dont read half of those.
Especially Remedy games it's fucking unbearable.
and i sometimes miss interesting storylines
i've been playing elder scrolls online and sometimes i find out i'm playing an interesting af quest
only when i'm about to end it and i'm in some cool place
so i go like "yo wtf, what brought me here"
and find out i missed on some huge sidequest
I've never played elder scrolls tbh, but when I was playing The Witcher 1 for example I stopped reading collectibles in the first quarter of the game, I felt they dragged down my flow.
yeah it happens, last game that integrated stuff interestingly was morrowind
infact it took me an awful amount of time to finish morrowind lol
although deathloop is doing an awesome job
but they adopt a totally different stance
like you can listen to conversations from enemies, find out stuff, and then you read about that stuff from clues you find around
still, i'm pretty sure a lot of peeps jumped most of the recordings
that's why while technically a superior medium for taking in-depth analysis of plot points, videogames come out as an inferior medium due to the nature of how you approach it
you're not going to treat it like a book or a radio broadcast, you're going to skip parts 'cause you want to play
That's why I love it when they have transcripts along with the recordings so I can just quickread it.
yeeeah... that's 'cause you don't have italian dubbers making it so much more entertaining lol
i swear deathloop italian dubbing is such high quality i rarely saw it in any movie or game before
and the original dubbing is stellar aswell
cutscene and memo skippers smh
read them all!
Ah, I see. Thatās interesting.
I have high doubts ratings would tank. People thought GOTās final season was hot garbage. That didnāt stop ratings from being massive. Also, IIRC, TLOU2 still made bank and won tons of GOTY awards.
But as a creator trying to build cache, which is especially hard to build, it might be best to step off the tracks if you see a train coming.
Nah I don't think Craig should step aside just because there's a vitriolic element in a franchise's fandom. He is tasked with creating, writing, and directing a series and he'll carry it out. HBO isn't going to look at those vocal minority gamers and reconsider his career.
Why should Craig step aside when he has done a great job with last of us season 1?? This makes absolutely no sense to me and some people will always complain no matter what and we should ignore them
That's like saying Rian Johnson should ease up on filmmaking after detractors of TLJ kept trying to flounder his career and those surrounding the film - Rian sold sequel rights to Knives Out to Netflix for like $500M and has a critically-acclaimed series on Peacock.
Absolutely
Say what you want about TLJ, but studios don't give a shit about the whining lol
Rian delivered a $1B movie.
That's enough for other studios to consider picking him up
Totally and studios shouldn't care what some people are complaining on twitter
Iām inclined to agree there. But Rian Johnson actually stepped away from Star Wars for that to happen.
He didnāt come back and try to develop another project. Well, there was that trilogy.
But it never materialized.
I'm not seeing the connection here.
His success isn't measured by whether he comes back and develops another SW title - it's measured by the portfolio he builds subsequent to that.
What are you saying?? Last of us season 1 has near universal acclaim unlike the last jedi
So why should he quit now ??
The Last Jedi was pretty acclaimed
Furthermore, it doesn't seem like Disney is in a rush to fast-track another trilogy so why should he sit and wait?
It was very divisive among the fans unlike the last of us season 1 which majority loved..
Yeah I dunno, I'm in the camp that HBO probably doesn't give much of a shit about the vocal minority of gamers who send death threats to actresses.
Craig has shown that he's able to deliver on-time
They're not about to lose him now
Yeah, but Season 2 and 3 is what weāre taking about. They will be based on TLOU2, which was similarly divisive
At least from a fan standpoint
Critics loved TLOU2
Mazin and Druckmann have a great relationship, I listened to each and every one of their official podcast episode and they have plans moving forward
I don't think HBO is concerned with 'bot_account_2354' screaming about TLOU2
Among the gamers.. not general audience because many didn't play that alright
Most adaptations aren't developed with gamers in mind - they're designed to attract a general audience, with the pre-existing fanbase hoping to accompany it.
Thatās a good point. Gamers tend to be a lot more critical than the average person.
And when that moment comes, then we will deal with it.. also Mazin has said there will be changes from the game too
Same can be said for Star Wars fans
Nobody hates SW more than SW fans hahaha
That's true
For me, the last of us season 1 was incredible, I haven't played the game and I loved it.. and so the idea that Mazin should now leave all of a sudden is preposterous
I mean, considering theyāre splitting the game into two seasons, I imagine there will be many sweeping changes
I could see ||Joelās untimely demise|| being a season 2 cliffhanger instead of something that occurs right off the bat
I absolutely think so too
(I suggest you spoiler tag your message.) Besides of the giant time stretch two of the reasons I can't see this happening is because a) it would cause poeple to maybe look up to ||what happens to Joel|| if they have to wait that long which is something that the creators definitely wouldn't want and b) wouldn't a complete restructuring of the story just to accomodate this thing happening in the end kind of signify an admittance of fault in the way the game presents the events? I think time wise the events of the game will be presented similiarly as they were to the game for better or worse.
YOU SHOULD BRUH
IT'S SO DAMN GOOD
I'm surpsied people in here haven't played i-
Oh I see what you mean.
By like officals.
Yes
But the film is still devicive.
Fans are torn though
yeah, I don't blame em
TLJ kino
Ease up on the yellin', boy
Don't call me boy.
The film is divisive with people who've made it their whole personality to just hate stuff. It must be tiresome, but it also doesn't take away from Rian's ability.
I wouldnāt say kino myself but honestly definitely no where near as atrocious at all as people say
I disagree.
In the context of the previous discussion, Craig shouldn't keel over to fan demands.
If you thought it was atrocious, you need to watch more movies.
Lol
I think it comes from a place of passion.
Yeah I don't really care to get into a whole big thing about the film. I think it's radical
I didn't like it at all tbh.
Thanks? lol
Yeah that's mad cringe
That shits toxic
Those folks just hate because they got rotten hearts
Like when they leaked Adam DRivers adress and exposed private family info about him
seriously in what world does hating on a film justifies doxxing
That shit is cancerous
Sick people
Chronically online, more then me.
And that's saying something
Yeah that is true
Like some shit with the Bella Ramasy thing
Folks who just hate to hate are in need for therapy and coping mechanisms
She's gone above and beyond, the only critsim people keep throwing is that she doesn't look like Ellie. But her perfromance is great.
That's why I'm glad that Craig and Neil are going to tackle TLOU2 and hopefully not kneel to toxic fan demands.
I'd rather have a great actress then a game accurate cosplayer trying to act.
I mean I still think there gonna change stuff for the medium, like they did here.
I'm aware
But we'll see, only time will tell.
Anyway, what would you rate the show
Seaosn 1
out of 10
Now that the shows is over it's safe to say it was over hyped. Great show but it couldve been more
Too much time skipping between the episodes and not enough clickers
TLOU isn't about the clickers m8
after this show/season ended 
||(X) Doubt||
The Walking Dead may be up your alley if you wanted more zombies.
it could have been more? Yes.
"more" means more zombies and abused stuff? No.
The entire appeal of the video game narrative was the Joel character. He's amazing in game, but in the show Pedro Pascal totally phones it in. I suggest playing the original game in the PS4 or PS5 remaster if you have either console. It's a lot of fun game play wise and I think there's a good chance you'll see eye to eye with me on the Joel thing.
There's also a PS3 emulation / Last of Us ROM option if you only have a gaming PC and no console
not as good as portraying the acting ability of the characters through the older console though lol
Walking dead stops being about zombies as well
I've played the game. Almost all the gameplay is something to do with stealth and avoiding clickers
how long ago? You might see it differently now...it's a story campaign through and through. Yeah, there's gameplay involved, but citing how many hours of it there were because you probably sucked at it isn't really a relevant critique
Lmao
Remember that had to adapt this for a game
So naturally there is going tk be less action.
In a game we experience more because by nature it is designed so that we control Joel moment to-moment . Where there show used a montage to depict the scene where Joel goes and saves Ellie, we experience the full shootout playing as Joel. This is because a game by nature allows the player to experience what might be considered mundane in a film or television show.
It still should've had scenes involving clickers and the action/stealth sequences in the game. This was more of a drama between Ellie and Joel than any other part of the game
Like the entire sequence in episode 8 was cut back alot
likely because maybe it wouldnāt translate well to the series
they inevitably have to make cut backs
Yeah itās not like zombies in film or tv have been successful before
Good answer
But peeps will be too busy feeling insecure about Abby being ripped for thinking about too many/too few infected, that's the future
honestly they did the best they could have with the series except Pedro fuckin sucks. He's just a mediocre actor in general
the writing was great though I thought they did a good job as far as discerning what to cut from the game
wow where did you find this reel that depicts the entirety of Pedro's acting range?
buddy im not gonna say you're wrong, because its a subjective thing
but you are absolutely the only person i've seen with this take lmao
Just finished watching a play through of part 2 on YouTube
Season two of the show will be soul crushing š
Pedro pascal sucks, that's one of the worst takes I have ever heard
I don't hate him by any means, I just resent his inability to stand up to the towering character in my mind that is Joel
He doesn't suck. He's mediocre. He has little range. He's alright.
When it comes to filling Joel's shoes, he sucks.
I absolutely disagree.. Pedro Pascal is awesome, saw him first in Narcos show and he was great in that.. I loved him in the last of us and mandalorian and Game of thrones.. I personally will watch him on anything
He's a perfect Joel
I'm sorry, just no. I disagree whole heartedly. Clive Owen is the closest name I could think of who has the range to play Joel.
Pedro is still a B-lister, so it makes sense that he was casted
Nah, and ya let's agree to disagree here
Part of the reason why the last of us is so successful is due to Pedro Pascal performance imo
Pedro literally did the same performance he does in everything else he's in. Pedro is usually casted for somewhat meek and pathetic characters. That said, I think he could play a badass and fill Joel's shoes but I honestly don't think Joel from the game had the same impact on him or you or anyone else who thinks he's a great Joel because he is definitely phoning this performance in as his usual Pedro.
Like, in the beginning where people are "intimidated" in the QZ by Joel. Pedro does not sell it at all. Video game Joel totally does. I'm curious what the voice actor looks like or the person they modeled him after is.
Absolutely disagree and for me, the game and a TV show are two separate things.. I don't even care much about the game
No, the Last of Us show is successful is because the writers took a break from taking a shit on all that is holy for 5 minutes and didn't fuck with the goddamn story so much. Therefore in their elation of finally getting the show they wanted, they see something in Pedro that's just not fucking there.
If Joel wasn't casted well the show wouldn't have been as good as it got.. you clearly are biased against Pedro alright, that's fine but I think he's great
dude, so far I have said: I think he's generally mediocre, that I don't hate him, that I think he could have done the job if he really wanted to. Does that sound like bias to you? Give me a fucking break. Maybe play the first 20 minutes of one of the remasters of the original game and see what I'm actually talking about.
I think he was given a script but i don't think he experienced the game.
I don't care about the game alright, vast majority of people watching the show haven't played the game.. what I care is the show and Pedro's performance was incredible that's it for me..
lol
wow why the fuck did I just waste the last 15 minutes talking to you?
what a jackass
Hey don't be personal here...there are rules
We have a disagreement that's all.. you think Pedro's performance was mediocre... I think it was great.. let's agree to disagree and end this
dude, I'm sitting here comparing the original Joel to Pedro's performance and you're just on repeat "hur dur he was great" and you have no reference point of the actual greatness. Unbelievable.
you should have lead with "I didn't play the game"
Game and TV shows are Two separate things.. I don't equate the two
but you wanted to hoist your uninformed opinion on me anyway
think for a second, jesus
Yes but I've seen the cut scenes and side by side comparisons.. TV one did it much better for me
lol this is so wrong
Just my opinion
play the game from the beginning my dude
then bring this up to me again if you want
side-by-sides aren't nearly enough
highly recommend the ps4 or 5 remaster if you have the means.
has to get the last word has the least information
I don't need to play the game to enjoy a show, not everyone loves playing a game also but you come from a certain perspective as a big game fan and your perspective will certainly be different than mine who hasn't played the game
It's like with marvel movies.. and I too have discussions with people who are die hard comics fans and I don't read comics
it's a story campaign game it's not a huge ask to play the game. You're the one who challenged my assertions, if you're not going to follow through just stop trying to get the last word in J-F-C
still typing
Again, for me and many others.. I don't need to play the game to watch and enjoy a show, never did and I won't do it in the future..
Two totally different mediums
not when it comes to this particular genre of game. The Last of Us doesn't have side missions or multiple choice or anything, it is purely a story campaign. There is extremely little difference other than you're moving the story a long a bit by shooting some zombies on the way.
Let's agree to disagree
Not totally different mediums really at all.
No, I won't agree to disagree with either of your two major points because you're completely ignorant on one side of each point you've asserted so far. The burden of the argument is on you. I'll drop it, but you're not getting the last word, dude.
oh, he's typing again
I don't care about winning any argument.. I'm just expressing my opinion here that's it, I don't care about playing a game to better understand a show or a movie that's all
uh huh
You may think Pedro is great in his own right as Joel in LOU (show). I guess I could see that given the relativity to the shit we're subjected to otherwise on TV. My assertion is he does not hold a candle to Joel from the original story.
That's all.
We can't agree to disagree because we're both making entirely different statements that don't necessary negate one another.
anyway, Clive Owen would've fkin killed it
You don't even have to play the game. You could watch the gameplay and cutscenes on youtube or something.
It might be worth at least a glance because you might be impressed in how well the show was in not just capturing the story but also the feel and vibe of the gameplay.
I have watched few cutscenes and some gameplay...not the entire thing but ya from what I saw its pretty good
https://youtu.be/HJ3M1hBvZ2E idk how you can look in pedro's eyes in this scene and not think he's a phenomenal actor
#TheLastOfUs #TLOU #Season1 #Episode1 #Scene #4K
The Last of Us takes place 20 years after modern civilization has been destroyed by a global pandemic sparked by a mass fungal infection. Joel, a hardened survivor, is hired to smuggle Ellie, a 14-year-old girl, out of an oppressive quarantine zone. What starts as a small job soon becomes a bruta...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UfqA0SiKzf8 best bloody moment from Joel in the whole season, and it ain't even in the game.
brothers
the last of us mixtape:
https://youtu.be/zjQdEy9AUEc
the last of us playlist:
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLOd0Yu7cmOZC_XQh2sz7rorvBkrg8UgG6
#thelastofushbo
#pedropascal
#bellaramsey
#thelastofus
@thelastofus
@TheLastOfUsComebacks
@thelastofusgame
@TheLastOfUsBR
@TheLastofUsMag
Pedro Pascal mediocre actor = delusional take
Based hgh take
how does one have that shit of a take dude
pedro pascal a mediocre actor?
and im the queen of england
alright, give it a rest, i'll put something together to try to convey my point of view a little clearer
he (troy baker) looks like Matt Mercer IMO and was in the David episode.
for a fan of the game and you don't know what the voice actor of your fav character doesn't look like?!
I mean I know I'm weird but Google doesn't take that much work and TLOU does PR like CRAY
I googled it before dude i just forgot what he looked like. quit trying to reach so hard on something so trivial when it's clearly me vs the entire channel already
anyway, I like that again they had Ashley and Laura in the finale for season one... Ashley especially knocked it out of the park in the open... I sobbed... things were NOT okay
I had half a mind to toss a D20 at the screen
but they wouldn't appreciate that so I resisted
Brother, you're not Scarface. It's not you against the channel. Be confident in your opinion and own it, especially after you made it on a public forum
Wait he's a gamer, have you played the same games he played before speaking?
Very rude of you
Anyway I'll go as far to say that i knew pedro pascal only cause of narcos and i haven't watched a single thing with him except that Buffy the vampire slayer episode he's in šš but i thought he totally nailed the character
The joel from the game would be so cringe to see on a real person lol
Not an easy role either, I think the absolute best was in the episode with Tommy in the city. Absolutely brilliant acting.
Pedro Pascal only real flaw is that he was in the celebrities singing Imagine video
Whole season was fantastic but man, the hospital shootout was just, meh. So frustrating. For a 45 minute episode they most definitely had to room to stretch it out a little bit instead of reducing it to a janky montage. Would have been nice to see some proper The Last of US violence from the games, drawn out, gritty, sequential action. Would have put a bit more emphasis on the horrors he committed as well but eh. Aside from that solid 9/10 show.
Lol ikr
Iām just glad that they didnāt make it super action packed and gory
They made it sad and disturbing, as it should be
Couldnāt imagine calling Pedro a mid actor let alone a bad one, dude is obviously talented
Also in the end I expected him to be a little bit more tactical, no problem that it was a montage but he ||straight up fucking shot everyone|| and he didn't have any problem whatsoever.
Yeah it felt too easy for him
Its as if they were in a rush to wrap things up quickly
Hi here. Not finished show yet https://youtu.be/YJJGXkbeIiM
Amazing Shots of The Last of Us
Creators : Neil Druckmann, Craig Mazin
Directors : Ali Abbasi, Jeremy Webb, Neil Druckmann, Peter Hoar, Liza Johnson, Craig Mazin, Jasmila Zbanic
Directors of photography : Eben Bolter, Ksenia Sereda, Nadim Carlsen, Christine A. Maier
Music : Krutikov Music - The Last Of Us Theme | EPIC VERSION but as HANS ZIMMER...
bruh he's been speedrunning that segment for years
there is a lot to say about direction in tlou, stuff was handled perfectly
I mean, personally the appeal to me of the gameplay of TLOU is the methodical violence of which you are forced to commit. Itās brutal, bleak, and unforgiving. Both games use violence to convey the key themes of depravity and vengeance which affects the human condition, with the actions the characters commit having weight put on them, instead of each enemy just being a metal target. Enemies have names, they beg for their lives, the cry our in pain from wounds. Death isnāt easy, itās painful, and the causation of that isnāt something effortless, at least to the average individual, and I wish thatās something the show emphasised more, especially in relation to Joelās character and the weight of the hospital massacre, but I digress.
Main aired out the hospital like he was playing on easy š Stood out in the middle of a hallway with a mini-14 dropping mfs left and right wearing plate carriers and running M4s. Not saying he couldnāt clear them out because ofc he could but like, damn, he was acting more like Schwarzenegger in T1 than Joel Miller there lol.
Smoking that || early Pedro Pascal pack for S2 šš¬ ||
just a homage to those sweet cheats
I think S1 had some pacing issues that the first game really didn't have. Everything just seemed to pass so fast. I think a lot of people agree the second game had some pacing issues where it was just very slow through some sections so I kinda hope their approach to the show will even that out. I do think a lot of the second game won't translate as well as a show. Specifically the gameplay sections. the first game is a lot more linear in the gameplay portions. They cut a lot of that out in S1 but the second game kinda needs those gameplay sections to emphasize its point. it will certainly be a pain to adapt to a show
I found it funny that Joel was acting like a little punk who can't do anything. But, everyone around him literally fears him. Then he proves he is a true badass.
But, still in his head he is a defeated little man.
the only thing i didnt like about the very ending is they very clearly have set it up for season 2.
Listen to my podcast, @DoctorMikeCheckup, here:
Spotify: https://go.doctormikemedia.com/spotify/CheckUpSpotify
Apple Podcasts: https://go.doctormikemedia.com/applepodcast/ApplePodcasts
The Last Of Us is the biggest new show on television after a stellar run with it's 2 games, The Last of Us Part 1 and 2 on Playstation. As a big fan of the games...
Fascinating watch
The way first episode filmed, gives you goosebumps, when I was watching it I literally thought I am in that situation, and the sound effects was also super good.
still hate the choice joel did in the end
that scene with the sniper and them coming out of the ground was wild
everyone does... even himself š
Am I the only one who felt the dynamic between Joel and Ellie was lackluster in many ways?
I felt like the show relied on the fact that they should obviously bond due to the genre of the show rather than put time to establish it.
I think the show was horribly paced in some instances thats why it felt like a speedrun
Joel and Ellie felt more like buddies rather than a father daughter type
I just watched this video on facebook where this guy does a sculpture of the live action and game versions of Ellie and I forgot how much freckles she had in the game and how little she does in the show
tbf i didn't feel this, especially after episode 8, you clearly see ellie feeling like a daughter and joel like a father
the fact it was rushed is true tho, and it shows obviously, but that's just how tv series these days are done it seems...
I did overall enjoy the experience. Episodes 1 and 3 were highlights but thatās because those took their time to establish their stories. Iād hope they donāt rush the second season.
AY BRUH THATS ME RN
even promising sounds like too much work for winrar
they still prompt that message 
I don't remember if they did in win xp or 7, most of the time I acted like the message didn't exist
fact is that it never was directed towards the free users lol, it was for companies
a death sentence for companies who would skip buying it
Lmaooo
Experience the emotional storytelling and unforgettable characters in The Last of Usā¢, winner of over 200 Game of the Year awards.In a ravaged civilization, where infected and hardened survivors run rampant, Joel, a weary protagonist, is hired to smuggle 14-year-old Ellie out of a military quarantine zone. However, what starts as a small job soo...
$59.99
736
Hopefully it doesnāt run like ass.
Already heard bad things about the PC port
Too late
i'm trying the š“āā ļø of it now maybe it'll run better as has been the trend lately lol
holy shit it looks so amazing
Yeah the PC port was half-assed, which was expected because the dev also did the ports for Arkham Knight and that was a shit show lmaoo
Watching āThe Last Of Usā for the first time and when the fuq will that gay scene end with billy and Frank
Very funny now answer the question
i hope it lasts way longer than what you can overcome
š
Canāt wait for the shitshow that will be s2
Bout to be 2020 all over again
Tlou2 is a masterpiece in my opinion
Not perfect but still fantastic
Hope they don't change anything too big when adapting it
Reading up on it and it looks like they aren't
Maybe people will stop being irrational weirdos about the story when it's in tv form
it was very good just a liiiittle too long, making it exhausting to play by the end
runs great at 4k/ultra for me...except for the crashes.
my prediction is that it will be drastically shortened and people will find it actually far more impactful than the first one
I predict Viewership to drop when || Pedro Pascal is killed off ||
Personally Iād rather watch it in tv form than suffer through the 2nd game (not played it but know what happens)
Also going to a revenge plot in the 2nd season wonāt help imo
My viewership will certainly rise. I've been playing this PC Port and in every single cinematic that plays, my opinion about ||Pedro's mediocrity|| only grows stronger.
Iām saying he has a large fan base that may end up not watching anymore
Itās probably not big enough to cause any issues but they may stop at S2 and not renew it
nah they have to make it
there's enough Joel flashbacks and shit in there they'll be fine.
Depends on viewership and ratings
I literally stuck it out the end of LOU2 the game because I wanted those Joel flashbacks. I'm honestly so disappointed that I haven't met anyone else who doesn't see what I see.
Iāll have to watch those on YT lol
just play the game, dude
Nah Iām good heard itās a slog and the plot doesnāt interest me enough to warrant a play for me
Yeah Iāve played the first
oh yeah I thought you meant the Pedro vs in game Joel YTs which are probably all tailored in his favor
I'm putting together one myself that will make some waves
thinking I might try to get the Critical Drinker in on this one with me
No one can match Troy Baker imo
I think Clive Owen would have killed it
I think the length issues came from the slow moments
or maybe Matthew McConahaey
Is that the guy from Sin City?
I love the gameplay and combat but a lot of the game is wandering through empty environments
@digital mauve he's an A-lister, he's from everything. But yeah, lots of action films
Very well designed environments, but still
I believe he was offered a role as Joel actually but declined
He would've been perfect as David
@vapid owl would you rather anime waifus sprinkled about the place?
Iām guessing the writing wasnt intricate enough ?
Huh
of course he was. Pedro is not a good actor. I don't know why people worship him but he's the definition of blase
it's just that LOU is such a good story line that people are seeing something in him that doesn't exist.
exactly
Probably coz of the roles he gets
he's a mediocre actor with no range
Joel is so much weaker in the show
exactly
Joel is a tower of masculinity and "holy fuck this guy rocks" from the first few minutes you encounter him in the game. Pedro, I feel like kicking him in the nuts on the show
There's something missing. I think troy bakers performance was just so intricate and complex compared to Pedros
I mean heās only been the mandalorian and a cop in Narcos so itās kinda hard to judge
And unbearable weight
THANK YOU. I'm gonna link you to the shitshow where I was being roasted for this opinion by like 6 different rubes in this channel
I've had that happen too
No one compares to Troy ngl give my man an Oscar
#1063545602723557566 message @dire island
As I said heās got a big fan base š
then this one dude argued with me for a straight hour and didnt reveal until it was quitting time that he hadn't even PLAYED THE FUCKING GAME
So??
Also rant
Something that is significantly worse in the show is the environments. In the games the environments are stunningly beautiful and represent this hope rising up out of darkness. In the show it's just these drab landscapes and deserted cities that could be in any zombie show
when the entire conversation was COMPARING
The environments are almost a character that fit the story in the game
Whatās in the link coz Iām not opening that š
In the show I feel that it's just there for the characters to stand around and talk in
yeah after replaying this PC port maxed to the gills on my 4k screen / 3080 Ti I am definitely getting that sense loud and clear
they rushed the show like crazy
I think they rushed the show I was mad at the pacing and stuff they left out
Its crazy cause it literally has GOT level budget
ya basic, that's so
Also man the cinematography sucks ass in this show
š
That's ludicrous
John Woo haunts us again
John Woo ruined cinematography prove me wrong
Its like early breaking bad
Ngl this show wasnāt a 9/9.5 that I saw people giving it. It was more like an 8.0-8.5 for me
kinda off topic but still: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1PCtIaM_GQ must watch
Some filmmakers can do action. Others can do comedy. But for 40 years, the master of combining them has been Jackie Chan. Letās see how he does it. (Note: to see the names of the films, press the CC button!)
For educational purposes only. You can donate to support the channel at
Patreon: http://www.patreon.com/everyframeapainting
And follow me...
This might be harsh but I thought it was a 5
Out of 10?
Yes
LOL
Especially when compared to the games
Well it's all subjective but for me TloU was easily 9/10..
A 9 is like close to a masterpiece which I donāt think it was
I'm not gonna give it a rating in its entirety until I see how they manage part 2. But I give it 6/10 so far for casting Pedro Snore-cal
Lemme guess you donāt like Pedro Pascal
I just found the emotional core of the story to be significantly weaker. I felt attached to joel and ellie in the game in the first two hours. In the show I felt absolutely nothing aside from that one scene between Joel and Tommy
and Worm is totally right about the environments. They put minimal effort into that shit
I personally think it was, as someone who never played the game but watched the cut scenes here and there.. some episodes were better than the rest and the finale could have been fleshed out more but ya it's my favorite show of 2023 till now..
I don't dislike or like him, he's too boring for either.
Itās definitely the length, number of episodes and pacing that caused these issues
it's like saying "let me guess, you don't like freecell"
I think it was also Pedro being a bit stale
I guess if youāve not played it, it makes sense
I liked him in other things like the mandalorian but i really don't care for his work here
Maybe but I know many others who played the game and love the show as well because it was nearly perfectly adapted
He just kinda has the same tone throughout the show
It was definitely not perfectly adapted
They made a point to change things
For majority it was
Also the lack of infected caused an issue of them not helping each other survive as much
Pedro didn't bring Joel out until the very end when he made the effort to portray how ||Ellie saved his soul||. Everything before was an extremely disappointingly short of Troy Baker
The quality is debatable of course but they set out to do something different without a doubt
And the things they changed from the game compared to the show was better like that 3rd episode was just incredible..
Bill being the most notable example
I think their goal was to flesh out the characters but imo didnāt do Joel & Ellie that much of a justice in the process
literally when I played the game and it skipped to 20 years later, just the way Joel carried himself in those first few moments of the game cinematic, my eyes were glittering like anime eyes.
This show felt like Niel Druckman trying out different drafts of side characters he wrote while making the first game
Joel & Ellie literally saved each other from death several times and surviving the infected and the stuff they went through made their bond stronger
The show didnāt have that
It was done to a minimum
it was nice but it was trite. Nothing ground breaking there. I didn't hate it but I wasn't like "OMFG THIS SHOW IS THE BEST" because of it
I thought that episode was a masterpiece
you don't watch much
I think the best example of how the show failed to fully develop Joel and Ellie was the scene with the magazine in the car
Ya, only watched more than 200 TV shows and currently watching around 6 TV shows..
Compare it to the game
Iāll be honest I didnāt like the 7th episode and the 3rd was complete filler aside from the last like 15 mins
any episode of any random season of "The Walking Dead" compares to ep 3 of LOU
Seeing Joel briefly open up in the game was very moving due to the cinematography, lighting, and acting from Troy
In the show its kinda
A dumb joke
what 6 tv shows are you watching right now?
Couldn't disagree with you more.. TWD was great first season but couldn't get past 3 seasons
Reminder that the best tv show is still the sopranos...
ah such patience for such a man of so many shows under your belt. I call bullshit on the over 200 tv shows and watching 6 right now.
They spent so much time on Bill in the 3rd episode where they couldāve given Joel & Elli more bonding time
Perry mason s02
Lucky hank s01
The mandalorian s03
Yellowjackets s02
Star trek Picard s03
Ted lasso s03
Recently binged the night agent on Netflix which was quite good
Agreed
best show of the '90s was ER, though. hard stop.
You don't need to believe me.. but I've watched that many shows
They attempt to have Bill parallel Joel but it doesn't work cause they forgot to develop Joel in the first place
And where was the scenes of Ellie trying to survive the infected trying to get medicine for Joel in ep7? No they focused on just Riley & Ellie which was a total snoozefest
You know what fair
What shows are you watching currently?
Real
Bro left š
I'm trying to watch the Resident but it's so over the fucking top it's difficult. I'm also watching "The Good Doctor" just because I think it's fascinating how David Shore thinks real people act like. But as far as shows I'm enjoying, nothing at the moment. I'm really struggling to find something good.
Something good?? There's so much good out there but of course not everything can be your taste
if it's actually good i've probably seen it
I've been NEET mode for all of COVID basically so
There are literally hundreds of new and old shows out there..
yeah I usually look for the old
So, what about Succession or yellowjackets or ted lasso??
did you guys ever see a BBC comedy called Ideal? criminally underrated
Watch Sons of Anarchy
My favorite comedy show is probably arrested development
also I thought "Peeky Blinders" was going to be shitty but it actually turned out to be somewhat of a masterpiece
The first 3 seasons exclusively
I repeat watch sons of anarchy
No thanks. I watched Justified recently, and I've had enough of that type of repetition for quite a while.
Heard a lot of good things about sons of anarchy
šæ
Great series
There's so much good new shows that I don't even have time to watch older shows these days and with April there's at least 4 more new ones
is it? is it really? or is it just another gangster show without much self awareness? I honestly don't know that many gangster shows that portray impact on the world stage (Peeky Blinders) or struggle with the existential questions of being a gangster (The Sopranos)
I'm going to place my bets on Sons of Anarchy fucking sucks. I'll watch it eventually because I really am getting to the bottom of the barrel, but my doubts are high
just a bunch of rednecks stabbing each other in the back like most vikings shows
Watch it or not, I just gave a recommendation
speaking of which "Vikings" (2013) is really the only Vikings show you need to watch if we're not counting Japanese stuff
@digital mauve alright, fair enough
i'm really trying to give Boardwalk Empire a chance right now but it's just sooo fucking boring. i feel like all the good parts have been shown to me in clips on youtube over the years
All we can do is give a recommendation based on our personal preference.. but again not everyone will enjoy it..
I mean there are people who couldn't get through Chernobyl of all series
I love Boardwalk empire.. watched it when it was airing at least the latter seasons, right up my alley as someone fascinated by US organised crime
I never watched Chernobyl because the instant critcisms of realism and such. But some people I respect have been talking highly of it so I'll give it a try. You know what film is severely underrated? "The Thin Red Line". I honestly think it's the best war film ever created. I'd almost go as far to say it's what "Apocalypse Now" should have been but I won't say that because they take place in different wars.
Chernobyl is a true masterpiece and its quite realistic too btw, of course not everything is 100% as its a drama and not a documentary.. but so compelling
Just 6 episodes as well
@dire island organized crime is boring, though. It's the same things happening over and over and over again. The Sopranos is good because it goes deep into sociopathy and the psychology of "the lifestyle" in general.
Well it fascinates me, from the godfather series to goodfellas to Casino and with Boardwalk empire, haven't had time to watch Sopranos though but I'm sure I will one day
Again.. so many interesting current shows to watch
lol "200 tv shows under my belt, havent had time to watch the greatest show ever though"
oh lord
ok i'm gonna finish this Australian/Western flick i've been putting off
have fun with nu-trek
also again: ER is the greatest medical drama ever made (yes, it's even better than Sherlock Holmes MD)
Gotta watch the Sopranos first to see that
also if i ever become dictator of the world i will outlaw all english dubbing in anime
all of it
Some I don't mind like Deathnote or Pokemon but ya, I hate watching any anime in English dubbs.. the live action foreign series and movies never
DB and DBZ is the one the most people are the most wrong about. They are truly clueless.
Strange to have seen Boardwalk Empire before Sopranos
oh yes I am sure he's got a very strange catalogue of things seen and not seen
This Scarface "me against the world" guy must be the most obnoxious film bro I've ever seen šš
Btw tlou2 story sucks and they're gonna do stuff differently, have an awful day š
I agree, TLoU2 story did suck
what exactly "sucked" about the story?
LMAO
Yo
What
Get that shit out my face
Never opening this channel again
I am excited for season 2 oh man no game has made me reflect and think as much as TLOU2
Most people just need to replay it and try to see it from Abby's perspective, avoid their bias towards ||Joel|| from their first play through
As far as I've seen, most people who didn't like it the first time who gave it a second chance changed their tune
No thanks Iāve played it twice, Abbyās story was just a rehash of Joelās and it was all manipulative.
I am interested in season 2 though, to see what they change and if they can write it better
"Write it better" as if your standards are what games attempt to achieve
Claiming Abby's story is just a rehash of Joel's is wilful ignorance and it was all manipulative how? Because it showed you another perspective?
My standards are all that matters to me, why would I care if someone else likes something if I didnāt
Itās not willful ignorance, itās my opinion based on someone who played the game more than once
By that logic if there's a movie you dislike that is considered fantastic to most other people you think that they should re-write it just for it to fit your likes and dislikes
I never said they should re-write to story to cater to my expectations
And I too have played the game more than once but boiling down Abby's story to a "Joel rehash" is just as ridiculous as stating the game only preaches "Revenge is bad"
You literally did when you said that you hope they rewrite season 2 of the show better than the game even though it's considered one of the greatest game stories ever
"To see what they change and if they can write it better"
TLoU2 is literally one of the most mixed games ever made, you canāt say itās some universally praised game
The first game was, not the second
Except its really only the vocal minority that preaches that sentiment
You understand that the people that love the game arent review bombing it and leaving thousands of reviews to the extent that it's haters are
I donāt agree with that, most people Iāve seen either hated it or had serious issues with certain aspects
Confirmation bias
I see loads of people praising it too
We both search for what we want to find
Though most criticisms of the game I've seen never elaborate and really repeat what they saw from their favourite youtubers
Itās okay to not like the story of a game
Of course it is, but to channel your personal dislikes of the story into objective hatred of a game is not
I didnāt even hate the game, I hated the story
Loved the graphics, sound design and overall gameplay
Because you personally didn't like it or because you think it's an objectively bad written story?
Both
What did you think was bad about it objectively
When discussing objectivity you can only really critique structural elements and how well thematic ideas were gotten across as a whole not the story itself
It would literally take hours to break it down, overall the main issue I had was the butchering of the characters
How were they butchered in your opinion
We don't have to talk about everything just the biggest issue then
I thought they were written as incompetent and inaccurate to their previous iterations
Confused by incompetent? But also what do you mean by inaccurate to their previous iterations?
I believe they were written inaccurately for the sake of the story
From the first game
I see what you're talking about but I just see it as character growth?
It's been 5 years, Joel has learned to trust more and acts more open as you see when he literally sings to Ellie
They make countless stupid mistakes that based on what we previously seen would never happen, plot armor for certain characters that wasnāt needed
Ellie has fallen in love several times and made friends her own age they've all but forgotten the constant threat of survival as they did in the first game because they've grown and gotten comfortable
I viewed that as incompetent writing
But why not view it as character growth?
That is supported by actual evidence in the game
Just like Joel and Tommy giving complete strangers tons of information without knowing who they are or why they are there
They don't give them tons of information just their names and they live around here
But why wouldn't he? They've grown and learned to trust more and he just saved their lives you wouldn't expect them to kill you
Ellie and Dina being ambushed by a crew of enemies and the amount of times they should have been killed but werenāt
The whole point of the first game was Joel transformed from traumatised in the beginning to learning to loge again
love and not be so closed off
Ellie killing dogs and Abby playing with them
Ellie did it to survive and Abby is just another normal person why wouldn't she
Manipulative tactic to endear the character to the player and not do it organically
The relationship between Lev & Abby is a rehash of Joel & Ellie
How is Ellie killing dogs and Abby petting them manipulative
Because nobody wants to see dogs get massacred but everyone wants to pet a dog
Yeah and how does that make you feel why is that bad
Which brings it back to square 1, the revenge is a fruitless endeaver story
No, she killed dogs to continue her path of revenge
When they attacked her?
Are you trolling?
She wouldnāt have been there if she wasnāt hunting Abby, therefore it wasnāt a matter of self defense
If someone attacks you at any moment and you defend yourself that's self defense
It's on you for getting into that situation of course
This conversation is getting nowhere
Yes it is but why do you want it to end so bad
Because no matter what I say youāre not going to accept it
You have your opinion and I have mine
You're not saying anything?!
You're not supposed to like everyone
You're not supposed to agree with everything
I gave you reasons as to why I didnāt like the story, you gave me reasons why you did
But you're supposed to try to see their perspective
I see both sides of the story and I don't dislike anyone
And ultimately I think one side of the story is wrong and the other wasnāt
I viewed Abby as an unlikable character that hurt the story and the character I liked and wanted to see more of died in an illogical way too fast, thatās all that really matters
Ellie's side literally started everything and Abby let Ellie live twice
After all of her friends were killed and she still chose mercy
In my option we have to go back earlier than the events of TLoU2 to debate that
The point where Joel kills Abbyās father to save Ellie
Exactly initiating the whole events of the second game
So Abby was just getting revenge like Ellie was, she's not any worse of a person than Ellie
Which is a shitty story
Except it touches on much more than just that, trauma, revenge, inner violence, forgiveness civilisations, xenophobia transphobia, religion etc
The first game basically did all that but better
Okay that is blatantly untrue
It simply did not have the depth that the second game does with certain topics and doesn't even touch on many of them
Because it told the story you wanted
And you can't disagree on topics straight up not even showing up in the first game
We canāt skip over the fact that the main plot point of TLoU2 was leaked before the game even came out
That drastically changed how people felt about it
It might be the main plot point but it's far from the most important
Iām one of the people who donāt look at what Joel did as wrong, if you really analyze it thereās no reason to believe Ellie would have been the cure
Except she would have been the cure that's the whole reason the game ends on such an interesting note
The developers confirmed jt
It doesnāt matter if they confirm it, the logic isnāt there
Thatās just an excuse to further the narrative
How are you going to cure a clicker, a bloater?
That's not what the cure is for its not to bring the dead bsck to life it's to stop the living from turning
No cure even in real life brings the dead bsck to life
I donāt believe they had anywhere near the manpower or resources to even remotely distribute a cure
It wouldn't have happened overnight
And you're just speculating now, "What if?" "What if?"
And even if they did it was just be fought over and hoarded like any other resource in a world full of hostile people who wonāt even consider talking things out
There would still be a cure
The cure was just a fantasy, in the live action series itās even more blatantly obvious
There would have been a cure and I still don't think what Joel did was wrong from his perspective
The greatest scientific minds in the civilized world were called to examine the virus and they had no answer for it, you honestly believe 20 years later with no real doctors or technology left they could have pulled it off?
But I understand how people from other perspectives would think it is
It's a story and they say it would, also they have their 20+ years of experience experimenting and dealing with it
What the greatest minds of an old world did not have
Idk, thereās nothing to convince me they could have actually did it
Sounds just like you want to hate the second game and are coming up with excuses to do so
Rather than even considering its a multi faceted story with right and wrong being blurred
Sure they wanted to, they tried to but probably would have gotten nowhere after all the in-game collectibles stated that tons of previous experiments failed
There is no interesting narrative at all in The Last Of Us 1 if the cure would not have worked
Joel just takes her somewhere then saves her from killers there is no morally gray ending if the cure wouldn't have worked
The cure working or not is the entire reason for debate.
No it's not
Yes because if the cure didnāt work, Joel didnāt do anything wrong
And based on everything I just said thereās no reason to believe that
It's just up for debate by people who dont want to believe it would've so they can continue to like a character that no ones forcing them to like because you sre allowed to like someone and disagree with their actions
Lmao
There is no rule stating that the person you like needs to only make correct decisions
And you can apply either of those opinions to the cure working
Thinking he did the right thing saving Ellie doesn't automatically mean that you believe it's right because the cure wouldn't have worked
Perhaps it's right just because one person doesn't have to die for the sake of the many
The fireflyās were the only organization looking for a cure, everyone else either gave up or didnāt have the resources to do it
You think they would have distributed the cure to FEDRA, hunters and cannibals?
Realistically, maybe a few hundred at most
And over years if they actively did hand it out?